AIIGHT! Here we go again!
Look, I still don’t photo well. That’s... That’s just a thing.
I spent this week with a migraine - as you do - so could not have bright lights, sound, and was half out my mind with meds. The amount of times I found myself with a cuppa half-way to my mouth wondering when that happened and wasn’t this just warm? Thank goodness I have no aversion to cold drinks. And so, CRAFTING! Look, me bored is me causing destruction and chaos like a cat annoyed you got the wrong treats, how dare you, you will regret this when you put on your shoes! Anyway...
Lillianna went to see Aari. Aaralyn Chloè is studying to be a Theater props master. It’s basically a thankless job that turns dull productions into extraordinary events. Like lighting and sound, it too is under-ratted and yelled about a lot. But a pooka has to do what a pooka has to do in order to get magic into the world.
Lillianna is trying on her flower fairy shoes. (She can totally stand up in them on her own!) As usual, they are excellent. And, as usual, there is always a catch. Every time Aari makes something they turn out very well... until they sit overnight. Then somehow, some way, the gnomes come and mess them up somehow. Appeasement dosen’t work. The Arcane Academy sent over the Creatures Teacher, the Magical Mayhem Master, and the Professor of Charms and Wards. None of them could get the gnomes to stop. Are... are they really that mad Aari has stopped making cookies every night? It just takes so much time!
Speaking of shoes, Aarri! Your’s are killer! (Which can also be stood up in without a stand!)
“Why thank you,” she smiled, giving me a better shot. I’ll need to sneak one of the backs when she’s not so busy. She moves so fast, close-ups are... well, near improbable. At least while she’s still wearing them, anyway.
Aari drew Lillianna’s eye toward the bag at her feet. It’s the flower fairy bag for the play.
They discussed if it would have an acorn on it or not. I think so, but Lillianna worries that it will be more difficult to open during the play. Aari thinks it will be less difficult than a tie strap. Consider the flow of movement! Such difficult decisions. Lillianna says she will try it out as is, and if it is difficult, she’ll bring it back, so they can change it to an acorn.
“This butterfly bag looks lovely! And it matches your hair so well,” Lillianna told her friend. But I think - now hear me out - that little print bag behind Lillianna? The one that was near the flower fairy bag? I think that fits better.
What do you think? Butterfly bag, or -
Printed bag?
Well, they had to go discus tights and light up wings. I’ll show you some closes up on the bags, shall I? These are the butterfly bags. Each is different, lined, gold accented.
I rather like the rhinestone stone buckles, and if you look careful -
You can see a simple, subtle shimmer overlaid on the black. I tell you, Aari is all about those details!
Here’s another set. The blue is ‘arsenic blue’ which seems rather scary to me. Aari says it’s non-toxic, but as pretty as it is, even with metallic studding... *shiver*. A pooka lives dangerously, I guess?
Now, the shimmer on that black one is iridescent, and I like the moon accent. I also kinda like the simplicity of the cork one. The purple one is gold threaded. Something I think would be fun for a long awaited shopping trip. You know, the kind you dress fancy and pretend to be in a movie? That type.
Now these are duel sided bags! Look at this! The pattern changes, the colors, the accents!
The sides have simple accent shimmers on a few, and frankly this is the kind of quality I expect from a theatrical prop master.
Until next time!
8 notes
·
View notes
I can explain.
So, i've been thinking...i've never done anything with the non-apocalypse futures past a few months.
I'd also been thinking, that out of all the fan kids i've seen around, there wasn't a lot (if any) for Raph.
I ALSO thought, Family Web would be an absolutely horrible au to have Bishop be involved in (mostly b/c Leo would NOT be good with an evil government scientist. at all.)
anyways, here's an in-story explanation for what i got so far
When Raph's 25, he gets word that there's some government program doing some shady things. Now that wouldn't really be his concern, but they're rumored to be using mutagen so they feel obligated to check it out.
SO the three of them check it out (Not leo. He tried but the medical equipment got to him. He portaled to the roof to wait on standby.) They find a lot of failed experiments and the like, most being with at least some turtle dna for some reason.
They also find two very young, very alive baby turtle mutants.
So, of course, they take them home. (after completely destroying the lab, information and all.)
They find out a few days later (b/c of course Donnie copied the info and he and Jenny have been going through it for anything good) that ever since the failed invasion, Bishop's group had been taking their DNA samples left over from various fight locations, (and probably paying a few people to get blood samples too) and using it it to do genetic experiments. B/c the four have such a hodge-podge of dna to start with, the experiments were never stable. The two they stole being the best they've accomplished over the years. The two that just happen to have used Raph's dna.
I'm going to have to do more with this. Like give the boys adult looks and the like. but these two were being rotated in my brain on high for list the last 9 hours now and if i didn't share them tonight i was going to go insane. (i couldn't even focus at work i was so fixated on these two bitties.)
136 notes
·
View notes
Earlier this month, American Girl re-released a whole lot of long-retired stuff from Kit Kittredge’s collection.
Kit herself never actually went anywhere. There was just nothing to buy for her. Doll, book, and that was it. But it’s the 20′s now, and AG is slowly turning the focus back to the historical characters. They’ve finally acknowledged that Kit is an icon and deserves to have the nice things that we all so desperately want to give her.
I was looking at the new stuff on the Wiki because I was curious to see if there were any changes made to anything. It’s part of the “homework” I do for the purposes of doll blogging. While doing that, I noticed that the page for each product mentions how much each item originally cost, alongside what it costs now.
For example: Kit’s school outfit.
This was first sold for $22 when it was released in 2000, along with the first half of Kit’s debut collection. Now they’re charging $38 for it, an increase of $16 or 72%. I thought that sounded a little excessive, even if 2000 really and truly was more than twenty years ago and inflation has gone wild since the pandemic began three years ago.
So I ran the numbers through the inflation calculator operated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Look at that. It’s basically spot on. $22 in 2000, adjusted for inflation, is equivalent to $38.23 in 2023. I’ve been proven wrong.
I did the same calculation for her birthday dress and her pajamas, and those were both pretty much the same, since they were and still are similar in cost to the school outfit.
Now for her cute little scooter, made from a box of California oranges.
This was a later addition to her collection, coming along in 2006 for the price of $24. In 2023 it is now being sold for $50, a $26 or 108% increase. Let’s see how that tracks when adjusted for inflation.
Ooof. $24 in 2006 should only be $35.70 in today’s money, or $14.30 less than what it’s actually being sold for. So if this one feels a little overpriced, then it probably is, assuming that the materials and quality are the same. Both versions are made of faux wood, which means that the recently skyrocketing price of wood won’t affect this. Maybe there’s another increased cost somewhere that I’m not aware of. Or maybe AG has added a small nostalgia tax, a sort of “buy it from us or pay big bucks to someone selling it secondhand” reminder.
Another accessory that was brought back was Kit’s school lunch.
This set includes her metal lunchbox, an embroidered napkin, a cheese sandwich, an oatmeal raisin cookie, apple slices, and for some reason.... three whole entire raw carrots. (There’s nothing wrong with carrots, but like. When’s the last time you’ve even seen an adult eat three whole carrots for lunch. Carrots are huge.)
Anyway. It was sold for $16 when it was released in 2000, and now they’re selling it for $36, a $20 or 125% increase.
$16 in 2000 would be equivalent to $27.80, so her lunch set is overpriced by $8.20, assuming the cost of materials/labor have risen proportionally.
And finally, Grace the dog. Named for her distinct lack of grace and adorable clumsiness. Sold for $16 when she was released with the second half of Kit’s debut collection. Now selling for $28 which is an increase of $12 or 75%.
A 75% increase is very similar to Kit’s school outfit selling at a $72% increase, so my guess was that this is going to be a more reasonable price hike.
Adjusted for inflation, $16 in 2001 is now equivalent to $27.30, so Grace is in fact underpriced by 70 cents! Personally I think AG charges a bit too much for all of their doll pets, but that’s just me.
All of this was really surprising to me. Inflation happens so quietly in everyday life. It’s only been really noticeable in the last three years, when it seems like everything has shot up in price.
The inflation calculator goes all the way back to 1913. Now if you really want to see what those small changes look like after 90 years, check out how much a $150 doll like Kit herself would have cost in 1932, when her stories began:
You’d only need $6.71 in your pocket to bring Kit home. Imagine that.
169 notes
·
View notes
Any doll brand that tries to appeal to the christian soccer moms that call their dolls "demonic sluts" or "child hookers" are missing the point so badly. Changing the dolls faces, clothes, or bodies won't improve their opinion on these dolls, because those were never the issues to begin with. These are just the kind of people that take issue with virtually any depiction of the female form because it makes them uncomfortable. Even the amount of skin showing isn't the problem. (I've seen westerners call licca-chan "pedo bait" before. No dolls are safe lmao)
If it was about modesty, realistic body image, positive role models, etc then they would also take issue with male action figures that are marketed to boys as well (they're built like fridges, wear skintight bodysuits, and are made to play in fight scenes). But they don't. I've never seen anyone call action figures "roided up gigolos" or "slutty barbarians." Only the toys designed to look like girls/women are called sexually derogatory names and slurs. How curious.
There IS an important conversation to be had about over sexualization of toys aimed at little girls, but this is not what this is about. These people pearl-clutching over dolls in strapless dresses, skirts, or crop tops aren't doing it because they are concerned about the mental health or innocence of young girls. Tbh I think it's more of a projection of internalized misogyny from these women, and just plain old misogyny from men.
22 notes
·
View notes