Tumgik
#lemaitre
ephphathax · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Often science is falsely portrayed as incompatible with Faith. Fr. Robert Spitzer SJ, an expert in physics, philosophy, and theology debunks this diffused myth in a great talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ARp2TDYOqI
Among the many Catholic scientists who have shaped history, this timeline highlights 13 from the 13th century onward—who let their faith lead them on a journey to scientific truth. #MagisCenter
20 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
 C'est comme les jolies filles, les héros, dans une bonne société, on a toujours besoin d'en avoir quelques uns. - Pierre Lemaitre, Au revoir la-haut 
Photo: Catherine Deneuve photographed in Paris, France, 1963.
61 notes · View notes
chic-a-gigot · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Le Petit écho de la mode, no. 27, vol. 16, 8 juillet 1894, Paris. 7. Détail de l'éventail en dentelle Renaissance. (Modèle de Mme Lemaitre, 3, rue de Rohan.) Ville de Paris / Bibliothèque Forney
10 notes · View notes
renovatio06 · 2 years
Text
The Big Bang no longer means what it used to | Big Think
The Hot Big Bang no longer means what it used to stand for as Ethan Siegel explains.
Credit: Nicolle Rager FullerFrom a pre-existing state, inflation predicts that a series of universes will be spawned as inflation continues, with each one being completely disconnected from every other one, separated by more inflating space. One of these “bubbles,” where inflation ended, gave birth to our Universe some 13.8 billion years ago, where our entire visible Universe is just a tiny…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
ms2253 · 3 months
Text
[song] porter robinson, lemaitre - 'polygon dust' (2014)
https://songwhip.com/porter-robinson/polygon-dust
0 notes
gemstarb · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
youtube
0 notes
algrolo · 1 year
Text
Title: Continuum
Artist: Lemaitre
Length: 4:47
Release: 2013
1 note · View note
sin-scape · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Michael Jackson - Beat It
Tumblr media
Lemaitre - Closer
Tumblr media
Galdive - Sorbet
0 notes
harbor-princess · 2 years
Audio
0 notes
Tumblr media
Chaper One - Lemaitre (2017)
Artist : Milo Hartnoll
1 note · View note
lescarnetsdehaku · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Au revoir là-haut
640 notes · View notes
lafcadiosadventures · 9 months
Text
just remembered that when the Vautrin play got banned, (after one representation in which an inspired Frédérick Lemaître played one of Vautrin’s disguises/mannerisms as heavily inspired by Louis-Philippe) who was next to Balzac supporting him and reclaiming to the minister in charge? Dumas and Hugo.
49 notes · View notes
Text
Le film est déjà commencé ? (1951) by Maurice Lemaître
Music: The Only Scarf by Prefuse 73 & Machinedrum
13 notes · View notes
gebo4482 · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
BABBDI
80 notes · View notes
leontarii · 1 year
Text
Lucius 🩸🩸🩸
Tumblr media
33 notes · View notes
momentsbeforemass · 1 year
Text
Big Bang
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”
That’s how the Bible, the first chapter of Genesis (and today’s first reading), starts. With the account of Creation.
For many people, this is a reason to doubt or discard the Faith right out of the gate. Because of science. Specifically, the Big Bang Theory.
Which, as Catholic clergy, I find hilarious.
Because that whole line of thinking is based on the assumption that the Biblical account of Creation is a literal account of how it all happened.
It’s not.
The signals telling us that it’s not a literal account? They’re right there in the book of Genesis.
One clue? The sweeping, poetic language of the first account of Creation. It’s radically different from the parts of Genesis (and the rest of the Bible) that clearly are literal accounts.
The more obvious clue? The appearance of a second, very different account of Creation in the very next chapter.
Which means? Understanding it as a literal account of Creation requires a very badly informed reading of the Bible.
But what about the Big Bang Theory?
The Big Bang Theory was developed in 1931 by Georges Lemaitre, a theoretical physicist (PhD from MIT). An astronomer. And a Catholic priest.
Fr. Lemaitre posited the Big Bang Theory as an explanation of the observable mechanics of the universe. And nothing more.
When Pope Pius XII wanted to call it “scientific validation of the Catholic faith” because it pointed to a moment of Creation, Fr. Lemaitre said (in physicist language) please don’t, the Big Bang Theory doesn’t speak to first causes.
Before the Big Bang Theory was misrepresented by the Internet it was misrepresented by a Pope.
Inserting first causes of any kind (pro-God or anti-God) into the Big Bang Theory requires a very badly informed reading of the Theory.
Why is arguing the Big Bang Theory against the Faith is hilarious? Because you’re telling people that you don’t read things for yourself without saying that you don’t read things for yourself.
Well, if it isn’t a literal account of Creation, then what’s the point? Why is it the very first thing in the Bible?
The accounts of Creation (both of them) are meant to be read together. That’s why both of them are there. To give us a clear picture of who God is. And who we are.
The “why” of the cosmic sweep of the first account of Creation is answered in the intimacy of God walking in the Garden with the first people in the second account.
Revealing the heart of God. And this central truth.
Our lives find their ground – and their fullest expression – in our relationship with God.
Today’s Readings
44 notes · View notes