Tumgik
#in case its not clear shes talking to john <33
shellibisshe · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Elle groans, sliding back in her seat. She stares up at the ceiling, waiting- “You’re my favorite person to bother, deputy.” “Oh, joy,” she deadpans back. She puts a hand on her forehead, squeezing at her temples, “why are you like this?” “I already gave you my backstory, but I can tell you again-“ “No.”
— templates: one, two
a remake (sort of) of this edit in case yall wanted to see it
48 notes · View notes
get-back-homeward · 6 months
Text
the 2023 reissue of the beatles’ red album is out as of midnight last night. the glow up that Love Me Do got has me very excited to hear what this new separation tech can do to their earliest songs. i’ve long been annoyed with the old stereo mixes for their 1963 songs and typically force them to mono to avoid feeling lopsided hearing vocals in one ear and not the other. my father doesn’t even acknowledge that the stereo mixes exist and still clings to his original mono versions. i can’t blame him as i always favor the live versions over these mixes. but i heard they were adding more 1963 songs for this reissue, and in a fit of blind belief from the Love Me Do reveal, i broke down and preordered a copy. will i regret my purchase?
so here’s my first reactions to the 1963 tracks (first 10 after Love Me Do):
Please Please Me 🤔🤔🤔
hmm, my first thought is that it may be a bit too much separation? there was already quite a lot in the 2009 album version, but i don’t care for how much echo is on that one. i think this fixes the echo for me, so along with the stereo fix i’m counting it as an improvement. next to the 2009 mono mix, this one lifts the vocals slightly to hear each part better. i still like the live versions of the song best as it’s just the kind of song (proto garage rock?) that sounds best a bit dirtied up. i love hearing john’s half laugh so clearly at 1:33 after the lyrics flub, but the drums are the highlight for me. man, ringo was a force of nature on this track.
I Saw Her Standing There 🤩🤩🤩
i legit screamed. this is an experience. giles bringing his dad’s initial idea for the first album to life? there’s so much space here, it sounds like you’re in the middle of the cavern! along with the stereo fix, the echo on the handclaps that distracts from rest of the song is gone.
Twist and Shout 🎯🎯🎯
not too much of a change, just the right little tweaks here to elevate the clarity of each part. george’s guitar never sounded better. the clarity of john’s vocals is so wild i swear you can hear him spit. this mix is worthy of the song john ripped his throat out for. excellent addition.
From Me To You ❤️❤️❤️
gosh, john and paul’s vocals are so crystal clear. more dimension than the old mono version. the harmonica ending 😘
She Loves You 🤓🤓🤓
i don’t hear a clear difference on this. it’s still a bit fuzzy and flattened. maybe the drums are a bit clearer with more dimension, and bass slightly more upfront. the vocals sound especially fuzzy though, perhaps because they didn’t have the original master copy to work with. that was also the case with Love Me Do and its quality had me hoping they could CPR this one too but alas. i think the past masters 2009 version is better than this.
I Want To Hold Your Hand 😑😑😑
i’m no expert on this one but sounds unchanged to me. maybe the hand claps have more echo? and paul’s harmony is more distinct?
This Boy 😱😍🫠
immaculate. i am deceased. talk to me from the great beyond.
All My Loving 😘😘😘
it’s incredible how much different the balance sound makes. paul sounds so much clearer now. stereo fix aside, it doesn’t sound too much different until the backing vocals and george’s guitar solo. the last bass note sounds incredible.
Roll Over Beethoven 👏👏👏
this reissue fixes the main problem with the original red album: the lack of george songs. the original didn’t have covers but the additions here make this one feel like it belongs. i hear a bit of fuzz in the opening, but it clears up quick. listen to that guitar go! the 9 yo in me is dancing like a fiend over this. i never heard the handclaps so well. everything sounds more distinct, vocals, bass, drums, in a way you can appreciate each part but without feeling too intrusive. also an excellent last note.
You Really Got A Hold On Me 😍😍😍
vocals in both ears!!! just the biggest dumb grin on my face. crystal clear the whole way through, but especially on the climax. whew. that start-stop ending has never hit harder.
overall, i am delighted. even if all the rest of the mixes are crap, this new version is still worth it for the fixes to the 1963 songs. for me, the glow ups for This Boy and You Really Got A Hold On Me alone are worth the sticker price. it was an excellent decision to include covers. a wonderful way to celebrate 60 years.
6 notes · View notes
nightwingshero · 3 years
Note
32 - 43!
Thank you for asking, hun!
32. Do you have any characters who are twins? 
I do! Wren’s youngest children are twins: Braxton and Liliana. I was going to make Whitney’s kids twins as well, but I’m not sure about that just yet. But those are the only twins I really have so far. 
33. Does your character like math? How good are they at it? 
Wren hates math and is terrible at it. It’s one of the subjects she could never get a grasp on, to be honest. I really don’t think she ever tried to. Wren isn’t much of a logical thinker, she’s more creative. If she can avoid math, she will. 
Blair, on the other hand, loves math and is excellent at it. As an astrophysicist, she needs to be. She’s more of a logical thinker, even though she is emotional. She’ll go on for hours with equations and trying to solve formulas because she finds it all so fascinating and fun, like a puzzle. Science was definitely in the stars for her. 
34. Do any of your characters collect sea-shells or wear shell jewelry?
That would definitely be Mel. Moving to Jamaica gave her that opportunity, of course, and she’s a huge surfer, so she’s always on the beach or in the water. She fell into the habit of sending Whitney and Ivy shells here and there, just as a check in to let them know she was still alive and not dying somewhere, considering how impulsive she is. Now, the jewelry? Not so much her thing. 
35. Naptime, yes or no? 
Wren is a napper! She will fill up on cheesecake or something, and curl up and pass out while watching the Twilight Zone. It’s considered a perfect day if she can get a nap in, a day well spent. Wren can be a bit lazy. 
Blair...isn’t much of a napper. Not really. The only time you’ll see that is if she crashes from lack of sleep and tons of caffeine or sugar leaving her system--which happens more often than she cares to admit. There are lectures from Martin and Ray for it, because they insist she needs to take care of herself, but will she ever really learn? Doubtful. 
36. Would your character prefer to sit around and chill or be up and moving and doing something? 
I feel like this touched a bit before, but Wren, Jane, and Mel would rather chill. Whitney, Randy, and Rowan would rather be doing something, because they can’t sit still. There’s always something for them to do, something that they’ve been meaning to get done, or they’re just bored out of their minds. 
Blair is a toss up. She loves her lazy days, truly, but she also loves to be working. Now, once she becomes a vigilante and works with Oliver and Barry (...then later the Legends), she’s almost desperate for a day to herself--which is spent debating on whether to work on work or to be lazy about it. Most of the time, it’s a pretty even split between the two. 
37. Did any of your characters have a fever they almost died from as a child? 
Blair did. There was this one year where she got terribly sick, and her parents were pretty frantic about it. She was about 2 years old when it happened, so she vaguely remembers it, but they had her in the hospital for a while. Her mother took a sabbatical from work, which left her father the only one with a job there for a moment, but they eventually bounced back once Blair recovered.
38. Does your character worry about breaking the rules and getting in trouble?
Wren...is on the fence on that. She’s definitely a “grey area” kind of person and she’s gotten in trouble multiple times (while Whitney loses her mind at the thought). She tends to bend the rules or ignore the ones she doesn’t believe in. It’s gotten her into some predicaments but she usually finds her way out of it.
Blair is worried about it enough that she’ll mention if something is illegal or if it’s breaking rules. Now, she’s not as bad as Ray (who...is just a cinnamon roll) and she’ll find it amusing when he’s against something when its truly something small. Of course, being a vigilante is illegal, so there’s some wiggle room for her.
39. Do any of your characters have the responsibilities of an adult despite being a child, or did they when they were? 
Wren, unfortunately, did. She pretty much had to take care of herself after her mom died because her father just...neglected her purposefully. Learning how to look after yourself at such a young age can be...an experience, and Wren grew up rather quickly. She never truly had a childhood due to that, but she made up for that during her early years in college. 
40. If a loved one died, how long would they stay in mourning?
Wren takes that hard. It’s hard for her to forget and she handles it so poorly. Avoiding her emotions, locking them away, and letting it come out in anger is usually her go-to. She never truly deals with it or faces it, so it lasts way longer than it really should. It’s an open wound that sometimes festers and never heals. 
Blair typically works through it the best she can and in a healthy way...when she’s not losing control of her powers. She might have a hard time bouncing back a bit because she also takes it pretty hard, and her powers sometimes just...make it harder. But she talks about it, she doesn’t avoid it, and she mourns properly. Her grieving process doesn’t last as long as others. 
41. Do other people around your character dictate their life or do they get to choose for themselves? 
Wren is...70/30 on that. Once she joins John and Eden’s Gate, the tables turn. She’s someone that’s trying to “be free”, but she ends up finding herself in a gilded cage. Up to that point, she lives her life how she wants to, she doesn’t allow other people dictate that. Whitney is the complete opposite. It’s why she ended up being married to Joseph in the first place. Her life is dictated by Nancy and Joseph. 
Blair does her own thing and has always had support from her parents and friends to do so. You can’t tell her how to live her life, that’s a non-starter with her. She’s way too strong-willed and passionate to allow that to happen. She has her goals and has a clear vision on what she wants in life, good luck getting in the way of that. 
42. Did/do any of your characters have an arranged marriage? 
Oh, no. Not at all. Now, Kinsley almost got set up with an arranged marriage, but that’s more due to Indian culture than anything else. If there was one, I would say that Whitney’s marriage to Joseph is borderline. Mostly because that was more of a manipulation, and it was one of those things where she thought it was what she wanted and it’s what she chose...which isn’t the case, necessarily. I guess that just depends on how you view it. 
43. Do you have any widows/widower characters?
Well, Wren and Whitney both lose their husbands in New Dawn, so I have two that become widows. John dies because Ethan executes him (and Mel) for treason against New Eden (sneaking Liliana and Braxton out so they wouldn’t be killed by their murderous cousin), leaving Wren without a husband (Quinn may or may not swoop in later...). Whitney...kills her husband. Listen, after all the things that Joseph Seed has done (to her, her loved ones, and to the people of Hope County), he very much deserves it. Whitney stabs him using one of Wren’s knives. Long live the queen, you know?
2 notes · View notes
whiskynottea · 5 years
Photo
Tumblr media
An Interruption in the 1st Law of Thermodynamics.
Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5, Chapter 6, Chapter 7, Chapter 8, Chapter 9, Chapter 10, Chapter 11, Chapter 12, Chapter 13, Chapter 14, Chapter 15, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, Chapter 18, Chapter 19, Chapter 20, Chapter 21, Chapter 22, Chapter 23, Chapter 24, Chapter 25, Chapter 26, Chapter 27,  Chapter 28, Chapter 29, Chapter 30, Chapter 31, Chapter 32, Chapter 33, Chapter 34, Chapter 35,  Chapter 36, Chapter 37, Chapter 38, Chapter 39, Chapter 40, Chapter 41, Chapter 42, Chapter 43, Chapter 44,  Chapter 45, Chapter 46, Chapter 47, Chapter 48, Chapter 49, Chapter 50, Chapter 51 Chapter 52, Chapter 53, Chapter 54, Chapter 55, Chapter 56, Chapter 57
AO3
Thank you @theministerskat​ for your beta! ❤️
                                  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Chapter 58. Rain
How long can one night be?
It felt like I was lying in my bed for ages. I wanted to get up, run, do something, but the darkness was heavy outside my window, and my heart felt heavier. 
My heart, the one that kept beating, no matter how many times my breath hitched in my throat.
My heart, carrying its own heavy load, waiting. 
Holding off was slowly killing me, but I had resolved not to call him again.
Hours had passed while my phone remained silent. A sinking sensation wrapped around me, dragging me down, deeper and deeper. 
What had happened, exactly?
I had spent the first few hours rationalizing.
What if something happened to him? No. John would call me. Jamie is fine.
Maybe he forgot his phone at the pool and they are all out celebrating now. But he would send something from John’s phone, right? 
Not if he’s still mad at me for not calling him before the race. 
Maybe he needs time, and he will call when he’s ready. He’s stressed, and he’s exaggerating. It will be okay. 
If only he called sooner.
I had messed up, yes, but it wasn’t like I had been out for drinks, having fun, and ignoring him. And it wasn’t like we hadn’t talked all day. I would explain myself. I would tell him the truth and ask him to forgive me. Simple as that. 
Not that I hadn’t done that in my texts already. But texts were not the same. 
I closed my eyes and imagined his disappointment when the time had come and I didn’t call, when I didn’t reply to his messages. I could see in my mind’s eye how upset he must have been, his deep breaths as he tried to focus on the impending race. I hoped he’d thought of all the times I wished him good luck in the past, of how much I loved him and believed in him. Or at least to forget everything about me and give his best to the race.
It didn’t matter, really. Nothing was as important as winning the race.
I knew he would do well. He was the best swimmer I had ever seen.
It will be alright. He’ll call back and it will be alright.
I tried to stick with this line of thought and get some sleep. Make this endless night go by faster. 
But sleep wouldn’t come. 
Where was he? The chances he’d lost his phone were…scarce. He’d seen my texts and was still so angry that he couldn’t even reply?
A single message was all I needed. ‘I’m fine, won the race, we’ll talk tomorrow.’ How hard was that?
It was the first time Jamie had done this. The first time he blatantly ignored me. The first time he didn’t want to talk to me. 
Or rather, the second. The first one had been when he got the scholarship, but that had been different. 
This wasn’t at all like him. 
Maybe he’s preparing a surprise for me?
The week following the New Jersey race would be a slack one. Maybe he’d come to visit me, to celebrate with me.
I let hope nestle in my chest, its arrival gifting me with a few full breaths. Maybe he was flying to England right now. A smile curled the corners of my mouth, up and up, until I was biting my bottom lip in a smile full of expectation. 
A moment later, reality crashed on me. Exactly when I was the most vulnerable. It always does that, waiting in the corner until we give way to the dreams, and then rushes to overtake us. With a single move, reality names the dream an illusion and takes it away, with a low, malicious snicker. 
My smile vanished in a matter of seconds. Jamie wasn’t coming, and I was a fool to even think he would. He was in New Jersey, celebrating with his friends. 
The waiting was killing me. I held in my tears, refusing to cry when I didn’t even know why. When I didn’t know what was happening. 
He had left me hanging. He had left me in the dark, alone, with no power over anything. 
I felt small. Insignificant. Alone. 
When the first tears stained my pillow, sleep took pity on me. 
I didn’t dream.
Mary’s voice woke me and I felt her hand gently nudging my side. 
“Claire? Are you coming to the lecture? We need to go in fifteen minutes.”
The lecture? Did the world have the audacity to go on when my life was crumbling?
For the first time in my life, I didn’t care about the lecture. I didn’t care about anything at all, after checking my phone to find that nothing had changed since the previous night.
That was a living hell, I was sure of it. 
I pushed all thoughts and emotions deep down and got out of bed. It would do me no good to stay in the dorm all day, and I had practicals that I couldn’t miss anyway.
I brushed my teeth mechanically for a good five minutes and washed my face with freezing water until the bones in my hands ached from the cold.
Numb – I needed to be numb. Retreat to that place deep inside me where I was safe. A peal of cruel laughter left my lips. 
This place, and all the bloody safe places inside me had been opened for him. 
There was no safehouse, no hidden crypt. I had given everything and I had nowhere to go now. 
I started crying again and immediately rinsed the tears away. 
Get yourself together. Don’t think.
I left the bathroom and got dressed. Mary looked at me with a frown, but didn’t ask any questions. I loved her for it. No prying. She would patiently wait until I was ready to talk. Which meant never, in this case. 
We walked to campus and headed towards the auditorium. I vaguely registered that it was an interesting lecture, one of those that would fill my head with questions and ideas on any other day. Not today. 
Today, I took notes like an automaton. I breathed like an automaton. When the lecture finished, I talked to others like an automaton.
It was like living in virtual reality. I was at Oxford, going on with my day, responding to the stimuli around me as if they were real, but I had this feeling that everything was only a projection on a wall, and real-life would look like the earth had been destroyed by meteors. Or a collision with another planet.
Or maybe that was just my world.
I went on with my day as if nothing had changed, as if I could breathe as easily as the next student in the practical. 
I nodded mechanically and I even smiled once or twice when everyone was laughing, because I felt like I had to.
I checked my phone every minute. It felt like a punch in the gut. When I thought I couldn’t take it anymore, I turned it off, only to panic and turn it on five minutes later. 
Not that I had missed anything.
I thought of texting Jamie again, but what else was there left to say? How many times can one apologize before those three words sound cheap?
I wrote ‘I love you’ at least ten times, only to erase the message a moment later. Didn’t he know that I loved him? What difference would a text make?
After our practical, I followed Mary to the library. I sat down with a heavy textbook and ended up reading the same line twenty times. 
It was then that my phone vibrated against the wooden desk. 
My heart jumped to my throat, and my knees trembled as I tried to stand up. 
It was him, and he was smiling in the picture on my screen and I just wanted to fall back on my chair and start crying.
I didn’t. I swallowed hard, instead, and ran outside. Fat raindrops hit my face, but I hardly noticed them. I wore my earphones, and slid a finger across the screen.
“Hi,” I said, walking away from the entrance and leaning against the exterior wall, trying to shelter myself from the rain as well as I could. The light post was only four feet away, but my face was covered in shadows. 
“Hi, Claire.” Jamie tried for a smile, but ended up taking a deep breath instead.
My heart was beating so fast I thought it would break through my chest. A ridiculous thought from an aspiring doctor, and yet there it was.
“How did it go?” I asked. “The race,” I clarified, as if it wasn’t obvious.
“Second. I finished second.” 
Second. Shit. Is this the reason he didn’t call?
His face was a mask, his voice colourless. I didn’t know what to say. I’m sorry? It sounded stupid. Don’t worry? 
I nodded twice, before I mumbled, “Congratulations.” He didn’t seem to hear it. I cleared my throat and tried again, louder this time. “Congratulations.”
“Thanks,” he said, dismissively. 
And then, silence. A long, heavy silence that stretched and stretched until I couldn’t take it anymore. It was stealing my breath.
“Did you celebrate last night?” 
Jamie looked sideways, then back at me. “Aye, we went for drinks wi’ the team.”
“Nice.” I tried to smile. “Did you have fun?”
He closed his eyes and set his jaw. I saw his throat bobbing as he swallowed and waited for his answer, but his mouth opened only to close again.
“Are you alone?” I blurted. It was obvious that we couldn’t keep this conversation going for long, and I didn’t want to start talking about what really mattered if other people were in his room.
“Aye. John is out.”
I tried to smile, and let out a sigh before starting explaining myself. “Jamie, I am so, so, so sorry I didn’t manage to call you yesterday. I know you needed me to call and you’re angry at me, and you’re right… But I was in the middle of a tutorial and time went by, and –” I stopped abruptly and squeezed my eyes tight. “I am sorry.”
Jamie nodded but didn’t say a word. I couldn’t recognize the look in his eyes. 
“Talk to me, please. Talk to me, Jamie, we will figure it out,” I pleaded in a quivering voice. 
“Claire –”
“Yes?” I bit my lip hard, trying to keep the tears inside.
“I didna call ye yesterday and all day today, because I needed time to think.” 
The wall behind me was rough underneath my fingertips as I pushed harder against it, wishing for the pain to ground me. To prepare me, somehow, for what was coming. I knew it. I knew him. I could see right through him. The way he talked, how he looked at me… I recognized that look now – the pain and regret, the determination. Tears blurred my vision before he could go on.
“This isna working, Claire,” Jamie said, and I felt a thousand daggers sinking into my heart. I felt them hovering around me all day, biding their time. A whimper left my mouth before I could stop it, and I pushed my lips together in reflex. I looked at Jamie, at the bloody screen, and tried to keep my raging emotions under control.
“What –” I started in a broken voice, and I summoned all my courage to go on. I wouldn’t stop this conversation before it had even started because I was crying. I pushed my fingernails into the wall, willing it to support me. “What do you mean?” When Jamie only shook his head, I continued. “Since when is it not working?” I huffed a laugh, challenging him. “I forgot to text you once, and that’s it? I’m not good enough for you?”
That rilled him up. “Did I ever say ye’re not good enough for me, Claire?” he demanded. “Dinna put words in my mouth!” He then murmured something under his breath, lowering his eyes.
“So what is this? You don’t call, don’t text, don’t even tell me that you need time to think and I’m here waiting for you to deign to inform me that things aren’t working out because the idea stuck in your head?”
“It’s not in my head! It’s in my life! This – what we have... It’s not what it once was, and –”
“And you want to end it?” I couldn’t believe I was uttering those words. This had to be a nightmare.
“Aye.” It could have been a whisper of the wind. It could have been a raindrop falling into the river. It could have been the rustling of leaves. But it was his voice, and the sound choked me. A small word I had heard him say thousands of times. The same word, ending it all.
I bit my lip until I tasted blood. I scraped my palm against the wall, and saw the hand holding my phone shaking. 
“Why?”
Why are you giving up on us? Why aren’t you patient? Why are you tearing my heart out?
I couldn’t ask that. I wouldn’t. So I just whispered again, “Why?”
“I love ye, Claire,” he said, and I noticed for the first time that he was crying, too. 
Hearing his words broke all the walls I’d tried to build to keep my despair aside. “This makes no fucking sense,” I sobbed.
“I ken, I ken,” he repeated. “I love ye, mo nighean donn, mo ghraidh, my Sassenach. I love ye so much and I wish you were here or I was there, but you’re not and I’m not and I canna go on like this.” He said it all with breath, and then this face paled, as if a chunk of life was torn out of his chest. 
“No, no, no.” I shook my head violently, wet curls flying and sticking on my face. “We will make it work, we said we would, remember?” 
He needed to remember. He just needed to know that we would be together no matter what, and then he would change his mind.
“I canna. I miss you, and this is not what I thought it would be. Seeing you once every three months? What kind of relationship is that?”
“Our relationship!” I all but screamed. “It’s our relationship and we’ll work on it. This is just the beginning and I am overwhelmed a bit by the workload here, but I will get the hang of it. I know I should have called before the race –”
“Claire!” he interrupted me. “This is not about the race. I mean, it is, but it’s not only that. Ye’re not here when I need to cuddle in bed with you after a hard day. Ye’re not here when I want to go out and dance and feel your body against mine. Ye’re not here when good things happen, when bad things happen, when nothing happens… Ye’re not here.”
“Of course I’m not there! I’m right here, doing my best to be a part of your life! And you knew that, Jamie Fraser! You knew I wouldn’t be there!”
“Your best…” he trailed off before finishing the thought. I was ready for another attack, when he said, “I hadna thought it would be so difficult.”
I repeated his words, mocking him. 
“Yes Claire! I thought ye’d be with me until your term started, but no! God forbid! Ye had to volunteer and go to Zambia! And then –”
“You said you were okay with me going to Zambia!” I interrupted him, indignant. I felt my cheeks flaming in anger now.
“I said I didna like it! But ye didna step back! Ye said that ye really wanted to go and really, what choice did I have in the matter?”
I snorted, refusing to talk to him. I couldn’t believe that he was holding my trip to Zambia against me. What else was there that he had never talked about?
“Well, I’m not in Zambia right now.”
“Aye, and what good does it do to us? Ye have internet access and we still hardly talk. D’ye think that thirty minutes per day is enough to keep a relationship going? Because it isn’t!”
I took a long breath through my mouth, blinking at him. I couldn’t believe my ears. “We limit the time of the video calls because of your training,” I spat.
“And your practicals, your tutorials…” He shook his head and his red curls fell into his eyes. It had become one of my habits to run my fingers over his forehead and push them aside, but I knew that even if he was in front of me right now that would be the last thing I would do. Smack him on the forehead, maybe. “Ye didn’t come for my race, as we had agreed. Do ye ken how long it is since we had sex?” Jamie asked, bringing me back to our conversation.
I felt my eyebrows curving in an impossible arch. “What? So this – this is about sex?”
“No. Not only sex, but sex is important, too.”
“Our schedule is fucked up!” I declared.
“I ken!” he shot back. “This doesna change the facts though, does it?”
It didn’t. “We can do better,” I said, more calmly now. My breaths were short and fast, and I stopped for a moment, trying to collect myself. “I miss you, too.” Jamie didn’t reply. “I thought I was there for you, I thought what we had was enough.”
I slid down the wall, sitting on the wet pavement. I was soaked by this point and I didn’t care. 
“I thought it would be enough. I wanted it to be.” Jamie’s voice was soft, as if he murmured something in my ear as we lay together in bed. “But I want to live, Claire, not to be constantly suspended between two continents. I want to live here, now. And I wanted to share now with you, even though I couldn’t share here. But I can’t even have that.”
Because I hadn’t sent a bloody good-luck-text. “I don’t know what else I can do. I can’t promise that I won’t mess up again, but I can promise that I will try not to. And I’ll be there in a few weeks. We will spend a whole month together.”
“Sassenach,” Jamie rasped, pained. “Stop. Don’t do that.”
“Don’t do what? Love you?” I asked, with an incredulous laugh. “I don’t remember how life was before I loved you.”
Jamie rubbed a hand on his face. His eyes were red and puffed when he looked at me. “It pains me, Claire. It pains me to wake up and know you’re not in my arms, it pains me to count the days until I see ye again. I canna do it anymore.”
I had no breath to speak. Tears kept rolling down my face, and Jamie’s ragged breaths sounded closer through my earphones than the rain pattering on the pavement I sat on. I felt him closer than all the world around me and I wanted to reach out and grasp that feeling, afraid I would never have it again. 
“So that’s it?” I croaked, and licked my lips, tasting the salt.
It couldn’t be it. We couldn’t end like this. 
“I am sorry. I love you. I will always love you. But maybe this is for the best. For both of us, ye ken.” A sigh, and he continued. “I will focus on my life here, and you on yer studies…”
The words sounded unreal in my mind. I couldn’t reply. I couldn’t agree or oppose the notion, not that it mattered. 
Love isn’t a cage. It’s not working that way. Love is like the wind, aiding us in staying airborne, lifting us higher.
“Goodbye, Jamie.”
My finger trembled as I ended the call. I felt the sky drop closer, crushing me. A flash of lightning tore up the darkness in the distance and I closed my eyes, wishing Jamie would be there to hold me in his arms. 
But there would be no more Jamie. No one would hold me to keep me safe. No one would brush away the hair from my face. No one would kiss away the tears. 
I held my breath in an attempt to verify that my heart was still beating.
It did. My treacherous heart went on with hollow, empty beats against my ribs. 
My head hit the wall, and I stayed there, sobbing under the rain until Mary found me. 
Chapter 59
318 notes · View notes
cobrakai1967 · 5 years
Text
mine? ♡ spencer reid
Tumblr media
*gif used is not mine, credit goes to whoever made it* 
the song used here is spirits by angelo.
Summary: the reader and reid have a crush on each other, that they are aware of, but are too nervous to take it any further because of work.  Warnings: none really, mentions of religion. (I’m not very familiar with a lot of scripture, so please bare with me!)  A/N: Enjoy! Feedback is much appreciated! I really tried my best, I just didn’t know where I was going with it towards the end. 
i look up see the moon, I cannot explain this feeling and I love the look of you, I’m staring and time be stilling and all I do think of you, my mind I just cannot clear it i’m so scared of losing you, so serious really fear it
When you looked at him, you couldn't help but let your mind drift off. You’d start to notice everything about him, the way he would lick his lips before he spoke, the way his hands adjusted the cuff on his shirt. He knew that you had a crush on him and vice versa. You just didn’t want it to start affecting your work life, knowing that it needed to stay as professional as it could be. Your eyes averted from him as they focused back onto the case file that was displayed in front of you. It was a gruesome case, they all were. A woman had been found strangled with the words “the truth will set you free,” written in the lipstick worn by the victim, a bright red lip color. The case took place in Chicago, Illinois, your hometown. 
    “Hey, Emily, the words “the truth will set you free,” is also located in John 8:32,” You spoke out as your eyes looked up. She nodded as she agreed with your statement.
    “Actually, the full scripture is: “As Jesus spoke these things, many believed in Him. 31 So He said to the Jews who had believed Him, “If you continue in My word, you are truly My disciples. 32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” 33 “We are Abraham’s descendants,” they answered. “We have never been slaves to anyone. How can You say we will be set free?” 34 Jesus replied, “Truly, truly, I tell you, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. 35 A slave is not a permanent member of the family, but a son belongs to it forever. 36 So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” Spencer stated without hesitation, his brain was your favorite part. He had knowledge of so much, and it was all stored within his mind. 
“So what if the unsub believes that these victims are not telling the truth and he thinks killing them is setting them free?” You spoke out as you gently bit onto the back of your pen. “The lipstick has to be symbolic, whether it’s adultery and/or if this has something to do with a female surrogate the unsub has resentment towards.” You muttered, trailing off. You believed it had something to do with adultery, the way the victims were posed, the bright red lipstick seemed like a statement of its own. 
    “I agree,” Emily had spoken, “Wheels up in 30.” The team departed, you already had a to go bag packed. You walked over to Spencer as he sat at his desk. 
    and all I do is think of you, my mind i just cannot clear it i’m so scared of losing you, so serious really fear it i do not know what to do, I’m taking advice from spirits
The thought of losing him was far too much for you, it hurt sometimes when you let yourself go long enough to imagine the pain. After working this job for almost a decade, you had seen so much. However, losing - or almost losing- someone is personal, it hits harder. 
Whenever you were on a case, you instantly hoped that you would get paired with Reid. The instinct to protect was evident, and after Reid had gotten shot in the neck in a shootout before. You wanted to protect him even more. You chewed the inside of your lips as you studied over his face. You gave him a sweet smile as your eyes connected. The gaze held for a few moments longer, in your mind, it was only the two of you there. That’s when it clicked, you knew you had to do something. If you waited any longer for Spencer, you might just explode. 
    “Hey Spence, I was wondering if while we wait to get on the jet, if you wanna go grab some fresh coffee?” You chuckled as you finished your sentence, your hands smoothed out the wrinkles in your pants. You were nervous, because you finally wanted to get it out. Was it the right time? Who knows. But you were ready to confess your feelings, and you knew this was going to come sooner or later.
    “Of course, everything okay?” He spoke as he stood up from his desk, grabbing his bag. You smiled, nodding your head.
    “Yeah, I just think it’s time we talk, don’t you think?” You spoke as you followed him, you saw the smile formed on his face. 
 There was a good coffee shop not too far, so you guys were able to walk there. There was little conversation on the way there, but you didn’t mind. Once you had gotten there and your orders were taken. 
    He had pulled your chair out for you as a blush crept to your face. Your mind was trying to find the right words to say to him. “So obviously, we know about the “crush,” You put the word in quotations, because it was the choice of words your coworkers stuck with. “But we wanted to keep it strictly professional...but I don’t think I can do that, especially after seeing you get hurt, I don’t think I can let the chance slip by anymore. I literally cannot chance losing you before there’s even a chance of us.” 
    He began to open his mouth, “And I totally understand if you don’t want to risk it or whatever-” You were cut off by Spencer’s lips being connected to yours, you immediately responded back. Pulling away, you smiled. “Well, shit, I guess that speaks for itself, no?” 
    Your names were called as your coffee was ready, walking out from the shop.  Your cheeks burned from blushing so hard. “Y/N, do you want to be mine?” He spoke out as he gazed into your eyes, it seemed like time had stopped. Everything around you seemed to be irrelevant.
    “Yeah, I wouldn’t have it any other way.” You leaned in and pressed a kiss to his lips, they began moving in sync as his free hand pulled you closer by your waist. After pulling apart, you began to walk back to the Federal building. 
    He was your person and nothing could change that. 
i can be open with you, I feel emotion with you i feel the ocean in you, left right I’m coasting to you
3 notes · View notes
daresplaining · 6 years
Text
Luke Cage Countdown: 6 Days
Misty Knight, Armed and Dangerous
Tumblr media
    At long last, MCU Misty Knight is getting her sweet bionic arm! This is essentially her origin story, and as such, it will have huge consequences for her life moving forward. Here’s a brief look at her disarming, recovery, and powers in the comics.
    As in the show, in the comics Misty Knight starts her career as a promising young cop, top of her class at police academy, ready to change the world. She serves on the NYPD for six years... until the unthinkable happens. 
Tumblr media
Caption: “Memories... years gone now, yet still terribly fresh, clear... Patrolwoman Misty Knight, twelfth precinct, NYPD, working the day shift.”
Bystander: “My god-- that man-- he’s thrown a bomb!”
Caption: “Reaction. Fast... instinctive. Futile.”
Iron Fist vol. 1 #6 by Chris Claremont, John Byrne, and Karen Mantlo
    Misty is unable to dispose of the bomb in time, and her right arm is caught in the ensuing explosion. Her partner, Rafael Scarfe, manages to keep her alive until paramedics arrive, but she wakes up in the hospital irrevocably changed.   
Tumblr media
Misty: “Damn you, Colleen-- I’m half-a-woman now, a freak!”
Deadly Hands of Kung Fu vol. 1 #33 by Chris Claremont and Marshall Rogers
    Misty is shattered by the loss of her arm. She sinks into a deep depression, feeling like she is now weak and worthless. Her best friend Colleen attempts to bolster her spirits and help her regain her self-confidence, both through encouragement and some well-intentioned butt-kicking, but Misty remains convinced that she’s damaged goods and no use to anyone. This attitude, along with the painful memories of her accident, haunts her for years afterward. The violence in her life often plunges her back into that moment of pain and loss, and she harbors a sense of anger and loathing about everything surrounding the event and anything that reminds her of it-- including her own perceived deficiencies. 
Tumblr media
“Misty Knight, first in her class at the academy, B.A. in criminology at John Jay... holder of the NYPD Medal of Honor... twice wounded in the line of duty... and forcibly retired after six years service. After all, what good is a one-armed lady cop?”
Iron Fist vol. 1 #7 by Chris Claremont, John Byrne, and Bonnie W.
    Much later, when Misty's arm is damaged again, she reacts in much the same way, showing that on a subconscious level, she’s still recovering.  
Tumblr media
Colleen: “You’ve crawled up inside your head... again. Focus your anger on something positive.”
Misty: “Colleen, save the zen master speech. Seriously. I don’t want to hear it.”
Colleen: “Your father wouldn’t understand why you’re not a cop anymore. [...] You could go back to the force right now and they’d be happy to have you, but the problem isn’t in your arm, it’s in your head.”
Daughters of the Dragon #4 by Justin Gray, Jimmy Palmiotti, Khari Evans, and Christina Strain
    Misty leaves her police career behind, and starts a slow healing process, largely facilitated by the creation of (K)Nightwing Restorations, a freelance detective agency she co-runs with Colleen. This new career gives her a chance to prove to the world, and more importantly, to herself, that she is still capable of working and making a difference. 
    In addition, though it serves as a daily reminder of what she has lost, Misty’s life is also improved by her brand-new super-awesome robot arm! 
Tumblr media
“The girl had said Misty’s arm had exploded. Well, why not? Why shouldn’t a robot arm explode when it’s riven with nuclear fireblasts? Because that’s what it is-- a robot arm. On a human woman.”
Iron Fist vol. 1 #3 by Chris Claremont, John Byrne, and Don Warfield
    In the comics, by the time we meet Misty she has already had her arm for several years, so we miss out on the details of its initial installment. But we know that it is Stark technology, and thus state-of-the art for its time. It is super durable, operates with all the ease of a real arm, and it grants Misty a degree of super-strength only limited by basic physics. Since the rest of her is squishy and human, she can push, pull, and smash with her arm, but it doesn’t allow her to lift extra heavy things, or do anything that would put tension on other parts of her body. 
Tumblr media
Misty: “Blast! I’m overshootin’ the wall. Gotta grab this stanchion as I go by-- use my bionic arm to stop me-- an’ hope the non-bionic rest o’ me can take the strain.”
Power Man #49 by Chris Claremont, John Byrne, F. Mouly, et al.
    However, over the years her arm has been upgraded to be more than just extra muscle. 
Tumblr media
Tony: “This arm is a superior design. I should have called Misty for an upgrade sooner, but I’ve been busy. The exterior is diamond interlaced with Vibranium. It is harder, lighter and stronger. I’ve had them install a pain dampener so if something like this happens again her nervous system won’t be harmed.”
Daughters of the Dragon #4 by Justin Gray, Jimmy Palmiotti, Khari Evans, and Christina Strain
    These days, it can do such fancy things as generate magnetic fields and energy blasts, and interface-- both physically and at a distance-- with computers. It operates as essentially a Swiss Army arm, making Misty an even more formidable crime-fighter than she already was. 
Tumblr media
Misty: “These originals were mechanized, a mix of Stark tech and counterfeit crap. Plenty of brawn. But no common sense, apparently. Fine. I’d just have to do the thinking for them. [...] I had Stark tech of my own. Made me very persuasive to A.I.”
Black Panther and the Crew (2017) #1 by Ta-Nehisi Coates, Butch Guice, and Dan Brown
    Plus, of course, it looks awesome. Initially, likely due to her insecurities, Misty had a flesh-colored coating over the arm, disguising its true nature. But nowadays, she usually keeps the metal exposed-- probably for a variety of reasons: It’s common knowledge among the superhero and supervillain communities that she has a bionic arm, so hiding it would be pointless, it looks cooler this way, and her attitude toward it has changed. The arm is a part of her now, and she is no longer ashamed of it. 
    99.9% of the time, Misty’s arm is presented as a permanent fixture. It is attached to her body the way a biological arm would be, when it is damaged she experiences pain, and it presents serious problems when it... say... gets caught on giant electromagnets. 
Tumblr media
Misty: “It’s no use! That magnet is stronger than I am. The only way I’ll get free is by pulling my own arm off.”
Power Man and Iron Fist vol. 1 #66 by Mary Jo Duffy, Kerry Gammill, and Glynis Wein
    However, the remaining 0.1% is Jeremy Whitley’s approach in his Secret Wars: Secret Love story. Here, the arm is presented more like a typical prosthesis, and is removable. In the final scene, we see Misty relaxing with her arm off-- which seems way more comfortable than the alternative. 
Tumblr media
Secret Wars: Secret Love, “Misty and Danny Forever” by Jeremy Whitley and Gurihiru
    Since this interpretation is in the minority, and directly opposes the way her arm is presented everywhere else, it likely will not stick. However, there is something appealing about it. Misty is a disabled character, and her bionic arm tends to feel like a quick fix-- a super cool quick fix, of course, but there are a lot of comics where, in terms of both art and writing, it’s easy to forget that she’s even an amputee. “Misty and Danny Forever” does a great job of spending what little time it has on exploring Misty’s life experience as a disabled person. It doesn’t rehash her trauma and self-loathing from the earlier comics-- she has largely healed from that, as is natural-- but it does bring up little day-to-day inconveniences that most Misty comics don’t address. 
Tumblr media
Misty: “It looked so beautiful in the store.”
Colleen: “It is beautiful.”
Misty: “I know. It’s me. It’s the arm. It slides right off the metal. [...] Colleen, I can’t do this.”
    Whitley discusses his reasons for this change in this interview: 
“I think for the most part that comics view disability as a thing to be fixed. If a person is injured, their parts can be swapped out for cybernetic ones or they can be magically healed and everything is better. The reality of living with a disability is much different. While her cybernetic arm makes her super strong, it is also bound to have effects on her life. Self-image is just one of those things. [...] It was also very important to me that in the last page, Misty does not have her arm. She is having an intimate night with her husband, getting her hair done, and snuggling up to go to sleep. First off, we’re talking about a large, bulky metal arm. Secondly, the thing has a lot of moving parts and is sure to make noise. I think the visual of a superheroic woman of color with her arm missing is very powerful.” 
    Again-- this is one isolated, unique interpretation. But we’ve always found it compelling. 
Tumblr media
    Now, we are finally getting Misty’s sweet robot arm in glorious live action, and we cannot wait. To start, it looks great. The design is fantastic-- still futuristic, as it should look to emphasize its state-of-the-art-ness, but it also looks realistic. The fact that it seems to be some form of plastic/carbon fiber rather than metal, and the sleeve-like part where you can see how it’s attached to what’s left of her biological arm, both provide the illusion of this being actual prosthetic technology. It’s possible that this arm will, just like 616 Misty’s first arm, only be super strong. But there ain’t nothing wrong with that.  
Tumblr media
    (The level of detail on this thing is breathtaking. Wow.) 
    We also know that this new arm will be-- gasp-- Rand technology! We’ve been excited about this idea for a long time, so we were thrilled when it was hinted in the last episode of The Defenders. Usually we’re sticklers for comics accuracy, but this change makes perfect sense. It keeps Misty’s story tied to the Netflix corner of the MCU (we’d love for these shows to cross over with the movies, but in this case staying close to home will allow for more freedom in telling this specific story). It is also a wonderful bit of bonding between Misty and Danny, who have had distressingly few interactions so far in this universe. The whole idea of him commissioning the arm for her makes us all warm and fuzzy, and regardless of whether this will actually lead to them interacting in this show, it still presents a form of personal connection, which we appreciate. Go check out this delightful Rand Enterprises spotlight on Misty, if you haven’t already! 
Tumblr media
    This will be a new chapter in Misty’s life emotionally as well. She will have to cope with having lost a limb, and all that that implies. Like in the comics, she should be in for a difficult time, because experiencing this kind of trauma is world-altering. There have been several shots in the trailers that suggest a Misty who is coping well and recovering, which is a big relief. But that can’t come too quickly, because that’s not realistic. We also have moments like the one above, which suggest turmoil. We also have this great Daughters of the Dragon scene, which suggests that Misty may be suffering from insecurity, and which Colleen may be using tough love to treat (just like in the comics). And while we know that Misty will still be operating as a cop in some capacity, it will be interesting to see how she approaches this, and how long it will last. Misty’s story is only just beginning, and for us, she is one of the people we’re most excited to see again this season.   
81 notes · View notes
revpauljbern · 5 years
Text
Governor Cuomo, the Abortion Debate, and Progressive Christianity
Tumblr media
What Does The Bible Tell Us About Abortion?
by Minister Paul J. Bern
For a website view, click here :-)
Without a doubt, this week's commentary is inspired by what transpired this past week in the state of New York, where the abortion law has been amended to legalize abortion right up until the point of birth. The law expands the state’s already liberal abortion laws to allow late-term abortions when “the patient is within 24 weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”   I offer this quote from the Philadelphia Inquirer as further explanation: “The law passed this week makes it impossible for the government to prevent a woman from choosing an abortion during the first six months. The state cannot step in to stop her. This could be catastrophic. Imagine if women in America could wait up to six months to choose to abort their babies for issues.... less devastating than Down syndrome. What if a woman chose to abort because she wanted a boy instead of a girl? That’s feasible under Cuomo’s law.”
The article continues: “The law also legalizes abortion up to the moment of birth if the mother’s life is in danger. In short: The law values the life of the mother more than the life of the child.” As this was being signed into law by governor Andrew Cuomo, the governor stated he “was opposed to abortion personally, but would not deprive others of that 'right.'” By the way, Andrew Cuomo is a Catholic. The Catholic church is by and large opposed to abortion, but usually for the wrong reasons. A prevented abortion becomes a new Catholic convert. That means more members, more robust Sunday collections during mass, and more priests and nuns for the Vatican to recruit.
Many people presume that a human being is created at the time of conception, but this belief is not supported medically or by the Bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a living human being, or at least not immediately. According to the Bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath. Allow me to explain the results of my research on this very touchy subject as delicately as possible.
First of all, God formed man according to Genesis 2:7, which says, “... the Lord formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being”. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not a living being until after God put breath into him. In Job 33:4, it states: “The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.” We were all formed prior to our birth, but we weren't living beings until God breathed life unto us. Again, to quote Ezekiel 37 verses 5 and 6, “This is what the Sovereign Lord says to these bones: 'I will make breath to enter you, and you will come to life. I will attach tendons to you, and make flesh to come upon you and cover you with skin; and put breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I am the Lord'.”
The Bible also spells out the appropriate level of punishment for those who would dare to hurt the unborn. In Exodus 21:22 it is written: “If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, and bruise for bruise”. It should be quite clear from this that the aborted fetus is not considered a living human being since the resulting punishment for the abortion is nothing more than a fine; it is not classified by the Bible as a capital offense under these circumstances unless the baby, its mother, or both are intentionally harmed or killed.
It is further stated in 1st Corinthians chapter 3 verse 16, “Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and God's Spirit lives in you?” We are only alive in Christ when we die to ourselves. An unborn fetus lives within the womb, but is not yet a human being until it draws its first breath. Can God live within the unborn baby? Well, the Bible does say, “All things are possible with God”, that is true and I believe it wholeheartedly. But as I have already pointed out, the Bible is absolutely clear that a baby is not a human being until it draws its first breath, so that question is actually besides the point. The physical body of the unborn fetus is surely there, but as before, that body isn't breathing yet.
Destroying a living fetus does not equate to killing a grown, living human being even though the fetus definitely has the potential of becoming a human being. One can not kill something that has not been born or taken a breath. This means that a stillborn would not be considered a human being either. Of course, every living sperm has the potential of becoming a human being although not even one in a million will make it; the rest are aborted. It would appear that God does not have any more regard for the loss of a sperm than he does for the loss of a placenta, or of a foreskin during circumcision, despite the fact that these were living tissue as the result of conception.
Now let's take this to the next level, which has to do with being born again in the Spirit. When Jesus taught Nicodemus about being born again he said, “I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of the water and of the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, and spirit gives birth to Spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, 'you must be born again'. The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.” (John chapter 3, verses 5-8)
Flesh gives birth to flesh, and spirit to Spirit. Being born of the water is a reference to childbirth first and to water baptism secondly. Being born of the Spirit of Christ refers to the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Plus, when we read our Bible, it says quite clearly in Galatians chapter two and verse 20, “I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me”. If the apostle Paul has been crucified with Jesus and died with him, then we are charged with the duty of being followers of Jesus right up to the very end as well. This is what being born again actually means.
In a number of versions of the Bible, one of the commandments in Exodus 20 that was spoken by God to Moses states: “You shall not kill”. According to the Mosaic text, this should read “You must not murder”, since the Bible has commandments stating that people shall be put to death for a number of different offenses. Exodus 21:17 states: “Whoever curses his father or mother shall be put to death.” There are also other capital offenses listed in Exodus 21. The popular ten commandments (in the original text there are over 600 of them) that are enumerated in Exodus 20 were given by God to Moses on tablets of stone. Verse 13 simply says, “You shall not murder”. That sums it up very nicely, I think. There is nothing in the Bible to indicate that a fetus is considered to be anything other than living tissue and, according to Scripture, it does not become a living being until after it has taken its first breath. Meaning, abortion is not necessarily murder.
Those who say, "If you're a Christian, you have to be against abortion, support our troops no matter what their mission, and therefore you must also vote conservative Republican," are simply reciting talking points from false teachers. There are a disturbing number of these people who have infiltrated the Church who are doing this very thing. Many cite the scripture found in Jeremiah 1:5, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." God is omnipotent. He has known all of us since before creation. In Numbers 5 describes "the Lord" ordering an abortion. It's clearly stated in verse 22, "May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries." Many argue that this is a misinterpretation, but I'm not so sure about that. It is better to err on the side of caution with regard to the Lord than not. Before false teachers turned the issue of reproductive choice into a political football, views on this matter were far less extreme.
Does this mean I am pro-life or pro-choice? Sorry, but I will not allow anyone to label and compartmentalize me like that. In many cases, I think that if the mother does not want the baby then she should put the child up for adoption. On that topic, why do women get pregnant in the first place? Often it's due to lack of access to birth control. The cure is national health insurance, such as Medicare for all which would include access to prescription drugs at minimal cost. You know, like birth control pills or other contraceptives?
In cases where abortion is necessary, such as when the baby is already dead before birth, in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother's life is in jeopardy, in those events an abortion should be performed by qualified medical personnel or under a doctor's direct supervision. But those are the only exceptions. In the end, if abortion was such a grievous sin Jesus would have mentioned it. He never did. While I am personally against abortion, I do not presume to tell women what they can or cannot do to or with their bodies. Enough said!
1 note · View note
patriotsnet · 3 years
Text
Why Do Republicans Want To Impeach Obama
New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-do-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/
Why Do Republicans Want To Impeach Obama
Tumblr media
Obama A Republican Congress And Impeachment
GOP Faithful Want Obama Impeached, Why? He’s Obama, That’s Why
Some Republicans are eager to impeach the President. Some are so eager that they go on the record saying that impeachment would probably pass the House. Representatives Barletta , Farenthold , and Senator Cruz say that the only obstacle is the Democratic Senate, which would not convict the President. The Washington Posts Jonathan Capehart took this a step further and argued Republican control of the Senate could result in President Obamas impeachment.
Regardless of who controls the Senate, the rationale presented by Cruz, Barletta, and Farenthold makes no sense. In no immediate future will Republicans control enough votes two-thirds of the Senate to remove the president from office. In order to reach the 66 vote threshold, Republicans need to win every single Senate election in November. Democrats may lose the Senate majority. However, no one believes Democrats will lose every single Senate race. More reasonable forecasts suggest Republicans will gain 5-6 seats. That is enough for a majority but not close to the amount necessary to remove Obama from office. In sum, there is no situation in which not having the votes is the reason impeachment has not been pursued.
There is a reasonable argument that the Republican Party, with a House majority insulated from electoral pain through a combination of safe districts packed with conservative constituents, would not hesitate to impeach Obama. He has been enemy number one since he stepped into office.
Efforts To Impeach Barack Obama
This article is part of a series about
e
During Barack Obama‘s tenure as President of the United States from 2009 to 2017, certain Republican members of Congress, as well as Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich, stated that Obama had engaged in impeachable activity and that he might face attempts to remove him from office. Rationales offered for possible impeachment ranged from Obama allowing people to use bathrooms based on their gender identity, to the 2012 Benghazi attack, to Obama’s enforcement of immigration laws, and false claims that he was born outside the United States.
Multiple surveys of U.S. public opinion found that a near supermajority of Americans rejected the idea of impeaching Obama, though a bit more than a simple majority of Republicans did support such efforts. For example, CNN found in July 2014 that 57% of Republicans supported impeachment, but in general, 65% of American adults, disagreed with impeachment with only 33% supporting such efforts.
How President Obama Will Be Impeached
Writing about Rep. Eric Cantors  stunning primary defeat last week, I warned Democrats that the House majority leaders loss was as much a wake-up call for them as it was for the GOP. Well, now I want to warn them about a very real possibility: President Obama will be impeached if the Democrats lose control of the U.S. Senate.
Yeah, yeah, I read Aaron Blakes astute piece in The Post on the impeachment process. He says probably not to the question of whether the House could impeach Obama. But probably is not definitely. And with the way the impeachment talk has gone, probably not could become absolutely if the Senate flips to the Republicans.
Rep. Lou Barletta became the latest to openly discuss impeaching the president. In response to a question from a radio host on Monday, the two-term congressman who was swept in during the tea party wave of 2010, said, Obama is just absolutely ignoring the Constitution and ignoring the laws and ignoring the checks and balances. Articles of impeachment, he added, probably could pass in the House.
In a later interview, Barletta said one of the reasons he wouldnt vote for impeachment was because a Democrat-controlled Senate would never convict the Democrat president. Blake also mentions this parenthetically in his piece. Others who have talked about impeachment point to this as the reason not to pursue the extraordinary political rebuke.
Follow Jonathan on Twitter:
Recommended Reading: What Is The Pin The Republicans Are Wearing
Reasons John Boehner Opted To Sue Obama Rather Than Impeach
While most Republicans favor impeachment, John Boehner recalls the losses that Republicans sustained in 1998 midterm elections, during the Clinton impeachment.
Loading…
In a near party-line vote, House Republicans on Wednesday approved 225 to 201 a resolution to sue President Obama or other administration officials for actions inconsistent with their duties under the Constitution.
Translation: Republicans accuse the president of executive overreach exceeding his constitutional powers and unlawfully going around Congress.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi calls the lawsuit “perilous and meritless.” President Obama dismissed it as a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. “Stop being mad all the time. Stop just hating all the time. Come on,” the president said during a speech in Kansas City, Mo., earlier in the day.
Some Republicans, such as former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, want the House to go further and impeach the president. A CNN poll last week shows that the majority of Republicans favor impeachment. So why would House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio opt for a lawsuit instead of impeachment?
Here are three reasons why:
Republican Voters Want To Impeach The President Good Luck With That
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and other Republicans calling for the impeachment of President Barack Obama might want to take a look at the history books and the U.S. Constitution before getting too excited about the idea.
Congress rarely uses its power to impeach, and when it has, impeachment has only infrequently — and in the case of a president, never — resulted in removal from office. Congress has initiated impeachment proceedings more than 60 times in the history of the United States. Just 19 of those cases have been tried by the Senate, and only eight federal judges have ever been convicted and removed from office.
Although House Speaker John Boehner has maintained he is not interested in pursuing impeachment, a top White House aide said Friday that he expected House Republicans to do just that. And a recent HuffPost/YouGov poll shows that one-third of Americans and two-thirds of Republicans believe Obama should be impeached. These numbers reflect an increasingly popular view in conservative circles, which Palin gave voice to earlier this month when she claimed the recent surge of undocumented immigrants at the border was an example of the president’s “rewarding of lawlessness.”
So, why do some conservatives appear to think this would be more of a Nixon than a Clinton situation?
Rep. Bob Goodlatte , chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, earlier this month offered perhaps the most sober rebuke to the calls for impeachment.
Recommended Reading: How Many Republicans Are Against Trump
Hundreds Of Historians Join A Call For Trumps Impeachment
More than 300 historians and constitutional scholars have signed an open letter calling for the impeachment and removal of President Trump. They say his continuation in office after encouraging supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol posed a clear and present danger to American democracy and the national security of the United States.
Those who signed the letter, released on Medium on Monday, include best-selling authors like Ron Chernow, Taylor Branch, Garry Wills and Stacy Schiff, as well as many leading academic historians. A number of the signatories had joined a previous letter in December 2019, calling for the presidents impeachment because of numerous and flagrant abuses of power including failure to protect the integrity of the impending 2020 election.
Since November 2020, the new letter says, Trump has refused to accept the results of a free and fair election, something no president before him has ever done.
Politically, the condemnation by historians may carry less weight than the presidents loss of support in recent days from business groups that once supported him or his policies. But David Greenberg, a historian at Rutgers who drafted the new letter, said that historical expertise mattered.
In September, the American Historical Association issued a statement condemning the first White House History Conference, held at the National Archives .
Public Debate Over Impeachment Demands
In terms of background, U.S. public opinion widely opposed efforts made to impeach previous Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. CNN Polling Director Keating Holland has stated that their organization found that 69% opposed impeaching President Bush in 2006.
According to a July 2014 YouGov poll, 35% of Americans believed President Obama should be impeached, including 68% of Republicans. Later that month, a CNN survey found that about two thirds of adult Americans disagreed with impeachment efforts. The data showed intense partisan divides, with 57% of Republicans supporting the efforts compared to only 35% of independents and 13% of Democrats.
On July 8, 2014, the former Governor of Alaska and 2008 RepublicanVice Presidential nomineeSarah Palin publicly called for Obama’s impeachment for “purposeful dereliction of duty”. In a full statement, she said: “Itâs time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.”
Andrew McCarthy of the National Review wrote the book Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case For Obama’s Impeachment, which argued that threatening impeachment was a good way to limit executive action by Obama .
Don’t Miss: How Many Registered Democrats And Republicans Are There
Is The Supreme Court Likely To Save Obamacare
The Supreme Court is likely to leave in place the bulk of Obamacare, including key protections for pre-existing health conditions.
Conservative justices John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared in two hours of arguments to be unwilling to strike down the entire law a long-held Republican goal.
The courts three liberal justices are almost certain to vote to uphold the law in its entirety and presumably would form a majority by joining a decision that cut away only the mandate, which now has no financial penalty attached to it.
Leading a group of Democratic-controlled states, California and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives are urging the court to leave the law in place.
A decision is expected by late spring.
Meet The Impeachment Crowd: 6 Republicans Who Want Obama Out
Trump Asks Why GOP Didn’t Impeach Obama for IRS Scandal, Obamacare Promise, Iran Cash Payment
From Sarah Palin to Tom Coburn, several Republicans are calling for impeachment.
— intro: Has President Obamas use of the pen and phone to circumvent Congress gotten out of hand?
Some members of the GOP seem to think so.
Even as the embattled president fights criticism over the escalating humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border, the release of Arm. Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in return for five prisoners from Guantanamo Bay, and the botched rollout of the Affordable Care Act, a mounting chorus of Republicans are calling for impeachment.
Heres a list of the high-profile Republicans who want to kick the president out of office:
quicklist: 1category: title: Sarah Palin url: text: Who Is She: 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, former governor of Alaska, sometime reality show host.
What She Said: Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president. His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, No mas. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. Its time to impeach.
When She Said It: July 8, 2014
media: 21159508caption: related:
quicklist: 2category: title: Tom Tancredo url: text: Who Is He: Former candidate for Colorado governor, 2008 Republican presidential hopeful, former congressman representing Colorados 6th Congressional District.
When He Said It: Valentines Day 2014
media: 24494513caption: related:
When He Said It: June 4, 2014
media: 24494378caption: related:
Recommended Reading: How Do Republicans Feel About The Wall
Clyburn: Gop Will Try To Impeach Obama
Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn is predicting that Republicans will try to impeach Barack Obama so that they can put an asterisk next to the name of the first black president.
There will be some reason found to introduce an impeachment resolution, the South Carolina congressman said Tuesday on MSNBCs The Ed Show. These Republicans have decided that this president must have an asterisk by his name after he leaves office, irrespective of whether or not he gets convicted. It is their plan to introduce an impeachment resolution.
He continued, is to put an asterisk next to this first African-American president in the history of the country to put an asterisk next to his name when the history books are written.
Clyburn, a high-ranking member of Democratic leadership in the House, argued that Republicans are aiming for impeachment as a way to keep the country focused on foolishness rather than on what we need to do in order to move an agenda forward.
As far as what will spur the call to impeach, Clyburn pointed to the heated debate on immigration reform.
Obama has warned Republican leaders in Congress that if they do not act quickly on a plan to reform immigration laws, he will issue executive orders aimed at changing the system. Speaker John Boehner has said that executive actions will poison the well on any attempts to reform the laws.
Obama Administration Immigration Policy
In June 2012, Senator Jon Kyl mentioned impeachment when discussing the Obama Administration policy on immigration. He said on the Bill Bennettradio show, “if itâs bad enough and if shenanigans involved in it, then of course impeachment is always a possibility. But I donât think at this point anybody is talking about that”.
In August 2013, Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma responded to a questioner in a town hall meeting, who had asserted that Obama was failing to carry out his constitutional responsibilities, by saying that “you have to establish the criteria that would qualify for proceedings against the president… and that’s called impeachment”. Coburn added, “I don’t have the legal background to know if that rises to ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’, but I think you’re getting perilously close”. Coburn did not specify what grounds he felt would support impeachment, but NBC News noted that Coburn “mentioned that he believes Department of Homeland Security officials have told career USCIS employees to ‘ignore’ background checks for immigrants”. Coburn mentioned no evidence that substantiated his belief.
Also Check: Did Republicans Block Funding For Election Security
Trumps Former Secretary Of Veterans Affairs Says He Would Vote To Remove The President From Office
David J. Shulkin, the former secretary of veterans affairs under President Trump, said on Monday that he would vote to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the president from office if he were still in the cabinet, saying that Mr. Trump has demonstrated that he is a threat to the nation.
Theres no doubt I believe that this is the time to put the countrys interest first, and I do not believe the president should any longer be serving, Dr. Shulkin said in an interview. I believe that this is an extraordinary time of danger and challenge to the country, and I would support removal from office.
Dr. Shulkin, who said he would also support impeachment but worried it was not an efficient enough mechanism, went further than most other former Trump cabinet secretaries have gone in calling for the presidents removal from office. John F. Kelly, who served as Mr. Trumps secretary of homeland security before becoming White House chief of staff, has also said he would support invoking the 25th Amendment while other Trump cabinet veterans like former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former Attorney General William P. Barr have offered scathing criticism without explicitly calling for Mr. Trumps removal.
Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff Is On Capitol Hill To Meet With The Impeachment Team
Tumblr media Tumblr media
From CNN’s Kristin Wilson
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows told reporters that the Democrats opening argument was pretty much what I was expecting and that its hard to make a good case when you have an unconstitutional process.
He said hes spoken with former President Trump on a regular basis but had not spoken with him about the opening arguments at the Senate trial.
When asked why he was on Capitol Hill, he said, I’m just coming over to meet with the impeachment team and said that he will be with them sporadically over the course of the trial.
Recommended Reading: Why Did Republicans Lose The Election
But It Would Be A Boneheaded Move For Numerous Reasons
When Congress heads off on its upcoming five-week recess, some Republicans, at town halls with constituents, will bring up the “I” word: impeachment. Barack Obama, they’ll say, needs to be removed from office. The reasons, in their view, are many: Benghazi. The IRS. An inability to control the Mexican border, to name but three. The constitutional standard for removal from office in Article II, Section 4 is “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and to the far right, Obama more than qualifies.
Talking tough about impeachment is what constituents in gerrymandered Republican districts want to hear. It’s good red-meat politics. But back here on planet Earth, the reality is this: There’s about as much chance of Obama being removed from office as there is of Nancy Pelosi throwing the winning touchdown in the Super Bowl. It’s just not going to happen. The probability is literally zero.
Here are some numbers: A CNN poll last week said one third of Americans want Obama impeached. Just a liberal media poll, you say? Well, a Fox News survey last week said the same thing. And that one third just happens to coincide more or less with the percentage of Americans who identify themselves as Republicans. Fact is, vast majorities of independent voters and Democrats oppose removing the president from office.
So the Republican dream of Obama being forced from office making Joe Biden the 45th president simply isn’t going to happen.
President’s Constitutional Duty To Faithfully Execute The Laws
On December 3, 2013, the House Judiciary committee held a hearing formally titled “The President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws”, which some participants and observers viewed as an attempt to begin justifying impeachment proceedings. Asked if the hearing was about impeachment, the committee chairman responded that it was not, adding, “I didn’t mention impeachment nor did any of the witnesses in response to my questions at the Judiciary Committee hearing.” Contrary to his claims however, a witness did mention impeachment rather blatantly. Partisan Georgetown University law professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz said, âA check on executive lawlessness is impeachmentâ as he accused Obama of âclaim the right of the king to essentially stand above the law.â
Recommended Reading: How Many Seats Do Republicans Hold In Congress
The State Department Labels Cuba A State Sponsor Of Terrorism In A Last
The State Department has designated Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism, a last-minute foreign policy stroke that will complicate the incoming Biden administrations plans for dealing with Havana.
With this action, we will once again hold Cubas government accountable and send a clear message: The Castro regime must end its support for international terrorism and subversion of U.S. justice, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement.
The New York Times reported last month that Mr. Pompeo was weighing the move and had a plan to do so on his desk. The action, announced with just over a week left in the Trump administration, reverses a step taken in 2015 after President Barack Obama restored U.S. diplomatic relations with Cuba, calling its decades of isolation an archaic relic of the Cold War.
Once in office, President Trump acted swiftly to undermine Mr. Obamas policy of openness, which Republicans said Havana forfeited by failing to implement promised reforms and continuing to crack down on political dissent. The designation requires a finding that a country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, according to the State Department. The move automatically triggers U.S. sanctions against Cuba, including limits on U.S. foreign assistance, export controls and financial restrictions.
What Did Trump Say About Obamacare
Why Republicans want Hunter Biden to testify in Trump’s impeachment trial
President Trump has been actively trying to repeal the healthcare law since he campaigned for the 2016 presidential election.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to revoke Obamacare because it’s been an “unlawful failure.”
A brief filed in June asked the court to strike down the Affordable Care Act, arguing it became invalid after Congress axed parts of it.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “President Trump and the Republicans campaign to rip away the protections and benefits of the Affordable Care Act in the middle of the coronavirus crisis is an act of unfathomable cruelty.
“If President Trump gets his way, 130 million Americans with pre-existing conditions will lose the ACAs lifesaving protections and 23 million Americans will lose their health coverage entirely.
“There is no legal justification and no moral excuse for the Trump Administrations disastrous efforts to take away Americans health care.”
Republicans also argue that some people are better off without Obamacare due to the fact that it does not cover those who need it most.
According to the provisions, people who earn just slightly too much to qualify for federal premium subsidies, particularly early retirees and people in their 50s and early 60s who are self-employed are not covered.
Trump endorsed a replacement to Obamacare in 2017 but fell short of passing the Republican-controlled Congress.
You May Like: Are Republicans More Wealthy Than Democrats
Trump’s Rhetoric On Impeachment In 2014 Becomes Relevant Anew
In his unhinged letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday, Donald Trump told the congressional leader, “You have cheapened the importance of the very ugly word, impeachment!” The president went on to suggest via Twitter this morning that he’s concerned about impeachment being made “trivial.”
He appears to have arrived at these concerns quite recently.
It wasn’t long ago, for example, that Trump wanted Pelosi to impeach George W. Bush for having launched the Iraq war. “He got us into the war with lies!” Trump said in 2008.
His attitude toward impeaching Barack Obama was even more cavalier. “Are you allowed to impeach a president for gross incompetence?” Trump wrote on Twitter in June 2014.
Several months later, after Republicans took complete control over both houses of Congress, Trump appeared on Fox & Friends and was asked what he’d like to see the new GOP majorities do. Trump replied that he wanted Republicans to impeach the Democratic president.
“Do you think Obama seriously wants to be impeached and go through what Bill Clinton did? He would be a mess. He would be thinking about nothing but. It would be a horror show for him. It would be an absolute embarrassment. It would go down on his record permanently.”
It wasn’t altogether clear what it was Obama did that Trump saw as worthy of impeachment; Trump simply seemed to like the idea of trying to rattle Obama on a personal level.
Does this sound like anyone else you know?
Donald Trump Claims Republicans ‘never Even Thought Of Impeaching’ Barack Obama History Tells A Different Story
President Donald Trump claimed that Republicans “never even thought of impeaching” Barack Obama, despite the record showing that many spoke of doing so over multiple issues.
In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump called on Republicans to get tougher and said that while he thinks Democrats are bad politicians with lousy policies he respects that they stick together. And, Trump said, Democrats are vicious.
“They’re much more vicious. We would never do a thing like this,” Trump told Hannity of the current House impeachment inquiry over the Ukraine affair in which the president is accused of soliciting the help of a foreign government in the 2020 election.
” could’ve impeached Obama for the IRS scandal, they could’ve impeached him for the guns or whatever, where guns went all over the place and people got killed with guns, Fast and Furious. They could’ve impeached him for many different things. They didn’t impeach him. They never even thought of impeaching him.”
In fact, Republicans in Congress did raise the impeachment of Obama multiple times.
Ex-GOP Congressman Predicts Republicans Could Flip on Trump Over Doral
In 2010, California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa called the alleged White House job offer to ex-Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Joe Sestak if he dropped out of a Senate primary “a crime, and could be impeachable” for Obama, Fox News reported.
Read Also: What Republicans Are Running For President
0 notes
statetalks · 3 years
Text
Why Do Republicans Want To Impeach Obama
Obama A Republican Congress And Impeachment
GOP Faithful Want Obama Impeached, Why? He’s Obama, That’s Why
Some Republicans are eager to impeach the President. Some are so eager that they go on the record saying that impeachment would probably pass the House. Representatives Barletta , Farenthold , and Senator Cruz say that the only obstacle is the Democratic Senate, which would not convict the President. The Washington Posts Jonathan Capehart took this a step further and argued Republican control of the Senate could result in President Obamas impeachment.
Regardless of who controls the Senate, the rationale presented by Cruz, Barletta, and Farenthold makes no sense. In no immediate future will Republicans control enough votes two-thirds of the Senate to remove the president from office. In order to reach the 66 vote threshold, Republicans need to win every single Senate election in November. Democrats may lose the Senate majority. However, no one believes Democrats will lose every single Senate race. More reasonable forecasts suggest Republicans will gain 5-6 seats. That is enough for a majority but not close to the amount necessary to remove Obama from office. In sum, there is no situation in which not having the votes is the reason impeachment has not been pursued.
There is a reasonable argument that the Republican Party, with a House majority insulated from electoral pain through a combination of safe districts packed with conservative constituents, would not hesitate to impeach Obama. He has been enemy number one since he stepped into office.
Efforts To Impeach Barack Obama
This article is part of a series about
e
During Barack Obama‘s tenure as President of the United States from 2009 to 2017, certain Republican members of Congress, as well as Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich, stated that Obama had engaged in impeachable activity and that he might face attempts to remove him from office. Rationales offered for possible impeachment ranged from Obama allowing people to use bathrooms based on their gender identity, to the 2012 Benghazi attack, to Obama’s enforcement of immigration laws, and false claims that he was born outside the United States.
Multiple surveys of U.S. public opinion found that a near supermajority of Americans rejected the idea of impeaching Obama, though a bit more than a simple majority of Republicans did support such efforts. For example, CNN found in July 2014 that 57% of Republicans supported impeachment, but in general, 65% of American adults, disagreed with impeachment with only 33% supporting such efforts.
How President Obama Will Be Impeached
Writing about Rep. Eric Cantors  stunning primary defeat last week, I warned Democrats that the House majority leaders loss was as much a wake-up call for them as it was for the GOP. Well, now I want to warn them about a very real possibility: President Obama will be impeached if the Democrats lose control of the U.S. Senate.
Yeah, yeah, I read Aaron Blakes astute piece in The Post on the impeachment process. He says probably not to the question of whether the House could impeach Obama. But probably is not definitely. And with the way the impeachment talk has gone, probably not could become absolutely if the Senate flips to the Republicans.
Rep. Lou Barletta became the latest to openly discuss impeaching the president. In response to a question from a radio host on Monday, the two-term congressman who was swept in during the tea party wave of 2010, said, Obama is just absolutely ignoring the Constitution and ignoring the laws and ignoring the checks and balances. Articles of impeachment, he added, probably could pass in the House.
In a later interview, Barletta said one of the reasons he wouldnt vote for impeachment was because a Democrat-controlled Senate would never convict the Democrat president. Blake also mentions this parenthetically in his piece. Others who have talked about impeachment point to this as the reason not to pursue the extraordinary political rebuke.
Follow Jonathan on Twitter:
Recommended Reading: What Is The Pin The Republicans Are Wearing
Reasons John Boehner Opted To Sue Obama Rather Than Impeach
While most Republicans favor impeachment, John Boehner recalls the losses that Republicans sustained in 1998 midterm elections, during the Clinton impeachment.
Loading…
In a near party-line vote, House Republicans on Wednesday approved 225 to 201 a resolution to sue President Obama or other administration officials for actions inconsistent with their duties under the Constitution.
Translation: Republicans accuse the president of executive overreach exceeding his constitutional powers and unlawfully going around Congress.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi calls the lawsuit “perilous and meritless.” President Obama dismissed it as a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. “Stop being mad all the time. Stop just hating all the time. Come on,” the president said during a speech in Kansas City, Mo., earlier in the day.
Some Republicans, such as former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, want the House to go further and impeach the president. A CNN poll last week shows that the majority of Republicans favor impeachment. So why would House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio opt for a lawsuit instead of impeachment?
Here are three reasons why:
Republican Voters Want To Impeach The President Good Luck With That
Tumblr media
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and other Republicans calling for the impeachment of President Barack Obama might want to take a look at the history books and the U.S. Constitution before getting too excited about the idea.
Congress rarely uses its power to impeach, and when it has, impeachment has only infrequently — and in the case of a president, never — resulted in removal from office. Congress has initiated impeachment proceedings more than 60 times in the history of the United States. Just 19 of those cases have been tried by the Senate, and only eight federal judges have ever been convicted and removed from office.
Although House Speaker John Boehner has maintained he is not interested in pursuing impeachment, a top White House aide said Friday that he expected House Republicans to do just that. And a recent HuffPost/YouGov poll shows that one-third of Americans and two-thirds of Republicans believe Obama should be impeached. These numbers reflect an increasingly popular view in conservative circles, which Palin gave voice to earlier this month when she claimed the recent surge of undocumented immigrants at the border was an example of the president’s “rewarding of lawlessness.”
So, why do some conservatives appear to think this would be more of a Nixon than a Clinton situation?
Rep. Bob Goodlatte , chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, earlier this month offered perhaps the most sober rebuke to the calls for impeachment.
Recommended Reading: How Many Republicans Are Against Trump
Hundreds Of Historians Join A Call For Trumps Impeachment
More than 300 historians and constitutional scholars have signed an open letter calling for the impeachment and removal of President Trump. They say his continuation in office after encouraging supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol posed a clear and present danger to American democracy and the national security of the United States.
Those who signed the letter, released on Medium on Monday, include best-selling authors like Ron Chernow, Taylor Branch, Garry Wills and Stacy Schiff, as well as many leading academic historians. A number of the signatories had joined a previous letter in December 2019, calling for the presidents impeachment because of numerous and flagrant abuses of power including failure to protect the integrity of the impending 2020 election.
Since November 2020, the new letter says, Trump has refused to accept the results of a free and fair election, something no president before him has ever done.
Politically, the condemnation by historians may carry less weight than the presidents loss of support in recent days from business groups that once supported him or his policies. But David Greenberg, a historian at Rutgers who drafted the new letter, said that historical expertise mattered.
In September, the American Historical Association issued a statement condemning the first White House History Conference, held at the National Archives .
Public Debate Over Impeachment Demands
In terms of background, U.S. public opinion widely opposed efforts made to impeach previous Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. CNN Polling Director Keating Holland has stated that their organization found that 69% opposed impeaching President Bush in 2006.
According to a July 2014 YouGov poll, 35% of Americans believed President Obama should be impeached, including 68% of Republicans. Later that month, a CNN survey found that about two thirds of adult Americans disagreed with impeachment efforts. The data showed intense partisan divides, with 57% of Republicans supporting the efforts compared to only 35% of independents and 13% of Democrats.
On July 8, 2014, the former Governor of Alaska and 2008 RepublicanVice Presidential nomineeSarah Palin publicly called for Obama’s impeachment for “purposeful dereliction of duty”. In a full statement, she said: “Itâs time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.”
Andrew McCarthy of the National Review wrote the book Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case For Obama’s Impeachment, which argued that threatening impeachment was a good way to limit executive action by Obama .
Don’t Miss: How Many Registered Democrats And Republicans Are There
Is The Supreme Court Likely To Save Obamacare
The Supreme Court is likely to leave in place the bulk of Obamacare, including key protections for pre-existing health conditions.
Conservative justices John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared in two hours of arguments to be unwilling to strike down the entire law a long-held Republican goal.
The courts three liberal justices are almost certain to vote to uphold the law in its entirety and presumably would form a majority by joining a decision that cut away only the mandate, which now has no financial penalty attached to it.
Leading a group of Democratic-controlled states, California and the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives are urging the court to leave the law in place.
A decision is expected by late spring.
Meet The Impeachment Crowd: 6 Republicans Who Want Obama Out
Trump Asks Why GOP Didn’t Impeach Obama for IRS Scandal, Obamacare Promise, Iran Cash Payment
From Sarah Palin to Tom Coburn, several Republicans are calling for impeachment.
— intro: Has President Obamas use of the pen and phone to circumvent Congress gotten out of hand?
Some members of the GOP seem to think so.
Even as the embattled president fights criticism over the escalating humanitarian crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border, the release of Arm. Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in return for five prisoners from Guantanamo Bay, and the botched rollout of the Affordable Care Act, a mounting chorus of Republicans are calling for impeachment.
Heres a list of the high-profile Republicans who want to kick the president out of office:
quicklist: 1category: title: Sarah Palin url: text: Who Is She: 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, former governor of Alaska, sometime reality show host.
What She Said: Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president. His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, No mas. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. Its time to impeach.
When She Said It: July 8, 2014
media: 21159508caption: related:
quicklist: 2category: title: Tom Tancredo url: text: Who Is He: Former candidate for Colorado governor, 2008 Republican presidential hopeful, former congressman representing Colorados 6th Congressional District.
When He Said It: Valentines Day 2014
media: 24494513caption: related:
When He Said It: June 4, 2014
media: 24494378caption: related:
Recommended Reading: How Do Republicans Feel About The Wall
Clyburn: Gop Will Try To Impeach Obama
Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn is predicting that Republicans will try to impeach Barack Obama so that they can put an asterisk next to the name of the first black president.
There will be some reason found to introduce an impeachment resolution, the South Carolina congressman said Tuesday on MSNBCs The Ed Show. These Republicans have decided that this president must have an asterisk by his name after he leaves office, irrespective of whether or not he gets convicted. It is their plan to introduce an impeachment resolution.
He continued, is to put an asterisk next to this first African-American president in the history of the country to put an asterisk next to his name when the history books are written.
Clyburn, a high-ranking member of Democratic leadership in the House, argued that Republicans are aiming for impeachment as a way to keep the country focused on foolishness rather than on what we need to do in order to move an agenda forward.
As far as what will spur the call to impeach, Clyburn pointed to the heated debate on immigration reform.
Obama has warned Republican leaders in Congress that if they do not act quickly on a plan to reform immigration laws, he will issue executive orders aimed at changing the system. Speaker John Boehner has said that executive actions will poison the well on any attempts to reform the laws.
Obama Administration Immigration Policy
In June 2012, Senator Jon Kyl mentioned impeachment when discussing the Obama Administration policy on immigration. He said on the Bill Bennettradio show, “if itâs bad enough and if shenanigans involved in it, then of course impeachment is always a possibility. But I donât think at this point anybody is talking about that”.
In August 2013, Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma responded to a questioner in a town hall meeting, who had asserted that Obama was failing to carry out his constitutional responsibilities, by saying that “you have to establish the criteria that would qualify for proceedings against the president… and that’s called impeachment”. Coburn added, “I don’t have the legal background to know if that rises to ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’, but I think you’re getting perilously close”. Coburn did not specify what grounds he felt would support impeachment, but NBC News noted that Coburn “mentioned that he believes Department of Homeland Security officials have told career USCIS employees to ‘ignore’ background checks for immigrants”. Coburn mentioned no evidence that substantiated his belief.
Also Check: Did Republicans Block Funding For Election Security
Trumps Former Secretary Of Veterans Affairs Says He Would Vote To Remove The President From Office
David J. Shulkin, the former secretary of veterans affairs under President Trump, said on Monday that he would vote to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the president from office if he were still in the cabinet, saying that Mr. Trump has demonstrated that he is a threat to the nation.
Theres no doubt I believe that this is the time to put the countrys interest first, and I do not believe the president should any longer be serving, Dr. Shulkin said in an interview. I believe that this is an extraordinary time of danger and challenge to the country, and I would support removal from office.
Dr. Shulkin, who said he would also support impeachment but worried it was not an efficient enough mechanism, went further than most other former Trump cabinet secretaries have gone in calling for the presidents removal from office. John F. Kelly, who served as Mr. Trumps secretary of homeland security before becoming White House chief of staff, has also said he would support invoking the 25th Amendment while other Trump cabinet veterans like former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former Attorney General William P. Barr have offered scathing criticism without explicitly calling for Mr. Trumps removal.
Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff Is On Capitol Hill To Meet With The Impeachment Team
Tumblr media
From CNN’s Kristin Wilson
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows told reporters that the Democrats opening argument was pretty much what I was expecting and that its hard to make a good case when you have an unconstitutional process.
He said hes spoken with former President Trump on a regular basis but had not spoken with him about the opening arguments at the Senate trial.
When asked why he was on Capitol Hill, he said, I’m just coming over to meet with the impeachment team and said that he will be with them sporadically over the course of the trial.
Recommended Reading: Why Did Republicans Lose The Election
But It Would Be A Boneheaded Move For Numerous Reasons
When Congress heads off on its upcoming five-week recess, some Republicans, at town halls with constituents, will bring up the “I” word: impeachment. Barack Obama, they’ll say, needs to be removed from office. The reasons, in their view, are many: Benghazi. The IRS. An inability to control the Mexican border, to name but three. The constitutional standard for removal from office in Article II, Section 4 is “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” and to the far right, Obama more than qualifies.
Talking tough about impeachment is what constituents in gerrymandered Republican districts want to hear. It’s good red-meat politics. But back here on planet Earth, the reality is this: There’s about as much chance of Obama being removed from office as there is of Nancy Pelosi throwing the winning touchdown in the Super Bowl. It’s just not going to happen. The probability is literally zero.
Here are some numbers: A CNN poll last week said one third of Americans want Obama impeached. Just a liberal media poll, you say? Well, a Fox News survey last week said the same thing. And that one third just happens to coincide more or less with the percentage of Americans who identify themselves as Republicans. Fact is, vast majorities of independent voters and Democrats oppose removing the president from office.
So the Republican dream of Obama being forced from office making Joe Biden the 45th president simply isn’t going to happen.
President’s Constitutional Duty To Faithfully Execute The Laws
On December 3, 2013, the House Judiciary committee held a hearing formally titled “The President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws”, which some participants and observers viewed as an attempt to begin justifying impeachment proceedings. Asked if the hearing was about impeachment, the committee chairman responded that it was not, adding, “I didn’t mention impeachment nor did any of the witnesses in response to my questions at the Judiciary Committee hearing.” Contrary to his claims however, a witness did mention impeachment rather blatantly. Partisan Georgetown University law professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz said, âA check on executive lawlessness is impeachmentâ as he accused Obama of âclaim the right of the king to essentially stand above the law.â
Recommended Reading: How Many Seats Do Republicans Hold In Congress
The State Department Labels Cuba A State Sponsor Of Terrorism In A Last
The State Department has designated Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism, a last-minute foreign policy stroke that will complicate the incoming Biden administrations plans for dealing with Havana.
With this action, we will once again hold Cubas government accountable and send a clear message: The Castro regime must end its support for international terrorism and subversion of U.S. justice, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement.
The New York Times reported last month that Mr. Pompeo was weighing the move and had a plan to do so on his desk. The action, announced with just over a week left in the Trump administration, reverses a step taken in 2015 after President Barack Obama restored U.S. diplomatic relations with Cuba, calling its decades of isolation an archaic relic of the Cold War.
Once in office, President Trump acted swiftly to undermine Mr. Obamas policy of openness, which Republicans said Havana forfeited by failing to implement promised reforms and continuing to crack down on political dissent. The designation requires a finding that a country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, according to the State Department. The move automatically triggers U.S. sanctions against Cuba, including limits on U.S. foreign assistance, export controls and financial restrictions.
What Did Trump Say About Obamacare
Why Republicans want Hunter Biden to testify in Trump’s impeachment trial
President Trump has been actively trying to repeal the healthcare law since he campaigned for the 2016 presidential election.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to revoke Obamacare because it’s been an “unlawful failure.”
A brief filed in June asked the court to strike down the Affordable Care Act, arguing it became invalid after Congress axed parts of it.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said: “President Trump and the Republicans campaign to rip away the protections and benefits of the Affordable Care Act in the middle of the coronavirus crisis is an act of unfathomable cruelty.
“If President Trump gets his way, 130 million Americans with pre-existing conditions will lose the ACAs lifesaving protections and 23 million Americans will lose their health coverage entirely.
“There is no legal justification and no moral excuse for the Trump Administrations disastrous efforts to take away Americans health care.”
Republicans also argue that some people are better off without Obamacare due to the fact that it does not cover those who need it most.
According to the provisions, people who earn just slightly too much to qualify for federal premium subsidies, particularly early retirees and people in their 50s and early 60s who are self-employed are not covered.
Trump endorsed a replacement to Obamacare in 2017 but fell short of passing the Republican-controlled Congress.
You May Like: Are Republicans More Wealthy Than Democrats
Trump’s Rhetoric On Impeachment In 2014 Becomes Relevant Anew
In his unhinged letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday, Donald Trump told the congressional leader, “You have cheapened the importance of the very ugly word, impeachment!” The president went on to suggest via Twitter this morning that he’s concerned about impeachment being made “trivial.”
He appears to have arrived at these concerns quite recently.
It wasn’t long ago, for example, that Trump wanted Pelosi to impeach George W. Bush for having launched the Iraq war. “He got us into the war with lies!” Trump said in 2008.
His attitude toward impeaching Barack Obama was even more cavalier. “Are you allowed to impeach a president for gross incompetence?” Trump wrote on Twitter in June 2014.
Several months later, after Republicans took complete control over both houses of Congress, Trump appeared on Fox & Friends and was asked what he’d like to see the new GOP majorities do. Trump replied that he wanted Republicans to impeach the Democratic president.
“Do you think Obama seriously wants to be impeached and go through what Bill Clinton did? He would be a mess. He would be thinking about nothing but. It would be a horror show for him. It would be an absolute embarrassment. It would go down on his record permanently.”
It wasn’t altogether clear what it was Obama did that Trump saw as worthy of impeachment; Trump simply seemed to like the idea of trying to rattle Obama on a personal level.
Does this sound like anyone else you know?
Donald Trump Claims Republicans ‘never Even Thought Of Impeaching’ Barack Obama History Tells A Different Story
President Donald Trump claimed that Republicans “never even thought of impeaching” Barack Obama, despite the record showing that many spoke of doing so over multiple issues.
In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump called on Republicans to get tougher and said that while he thinks Democrats are bad politicians with lousy policies he respects that they stick together. And, Trump said, Democrats are vicious.
“They’re much more vicious. We would never do a thing like this,” Trump told Hannity of the current House impeachment inquiry over the Ukraine affair in which the president is accused of soliciting the help of a foreign government in the 2020 election.
” could’ve impeached Obama for the IRS scandal, they could’ve impeached him for the guns or whatever, where guns went all over the place and people got killed with guns, Fast and Furious. They could’ve impeached him for many different things. They didn’t impeach him. They never even thought of impeaching him.”
In fact, Republicans in Congress did raise the impeachment of Obama multiple times.
Ex-GOP Congressman Predicts Republicans Could Flip on Trump Over Doral
In 2010, California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa called the alleged White House job offer to ex-Pennsylvania Democratic Rep. Joe Sestak if he dropped out of a Senate primary “a crime, and could be impeachable” for Obama, Fox News reported.
Read Also: What Republicans Are Running For President
source https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-do-republicans-want-to-impeach-obama/
0 notes
orbemnews · 3 years
Link
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot under pressure to reform police amid outrage over Adam Toledo shooting The city is in the midst of another weekend of protests over the actions of police, and Lightfoot is under pressure to back major reforms to a police department facing scrutiny over a series of controversial uses of violence. “Simply put, we failed Adam. And we cannot afford to fail one more young person in our city,” Lightfoot said ahead of the release of the video by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, which is investigating the March shooting. Lightfoot was elected mayor in 2019 as a first-time candidate for office who had recently served as president of the Chicago Police Board. She had chaired the Police Accountability Task Force that had been launched after the 2014 police killing of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald — a shooting that also triggered a federal civil rights probe of the Chicago Police Department. That task force’s recommendation for a civilian commission to oversee police then became a central plank in Lightfoot’s agenda as she campaigned for mayor. But, nearly two years into Lightfoot’s tenure, she has not introduced her own plan to create civilian oversight of police — despite having pledged to do so within her first 100 days in office, and despite the idea being a product of the task force Lightfoot once led. Two police reform advocacy groups have introduced a series of reforms that would allow Chicago voters to decide in a binding referendum whether to hand a civilian oversight board the power to hire and fire the police superintendent, set Chicago Police Department policy and negotiate police contracts. Lightfoot has balked at that measure, which could strip that authority from the mayor’s office over what’s become the central issue she has faced — and one for which voters would likely hold her responsible. Members of Chicago’s city council — including those who have been Lightfoot’s allies — expressed frustration that she hasn’t offered a police reform proposal of her own. Chicago Alderman Gilbert Villegas, who resigned from his role as Lightfoot’s chosen floor leader on the city council in February, said the council should vote on those proposed reforms. “The reality is, time is of the essence. We’ve been talking about this for decades. The mayor talked about doing this in 100 days, and we’re going on two years. We need to do this now,” he said. “The mayor has had two years to put forward something. She has not. And so given the time that we’re in right now, we need to move on this as soon as possible.” “As we delay it,” Villegas said, “we’re losing the public’s trust.” Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor said Lightfoot “definitely has not kept her word when it comes to policing, which is why we’re still in the space where other cities have moved forward to implement reforms and Chicago has not.” “You can’t expect the police to police the police,” Taylor said. “She is stopping this from getting done.” Taylor, who has advocated reforms such as eliminating qualified immunity for police and shifting funding from the police department to community organizations, said she doesn’t expect Lightfoot to ultimately back the sort of major reforms she believes the Chicago Police Department needs. “It’s going to be something watered down and it’s not going to make any sense. It’s not going to come from the people,” Taylor said. “All you’ve got to do is listen to the organizations. They’ve done the research, they’ve lived it, they’ve got the proof.” Lightfoot’s office did not respond Friday to questions about her position on the advocacy groups’ proposal, or when she’ll release her own proposal. The Chicago Sun-Times reported that she had addressed the issue in March during a virtual panel on criminal justice reform sponsored by the University of California, Berkeley. “This is going to be one of most important policy decisions that is made by the city of Chicago in decades. … Really recalibrating the relationship between the people and the police,” Lightfoot said then. “We’ve got to get this right … so we are actually setting these proposals up for success and not failure,” she said. Two years of police controversies The fallout from the shooting of Toledo is the latest in a series of controversies Lightfoot has faced over police actions in her nearly two years in office. In summer 2020, Lightfoot repeatedly ordered the bridges that provide access to downtown Chicago raised at night after protests over the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd were accompanied by property destruction. The move carried heavy symbolism — with critics saying it favored businesses over the rights of the city’s residents — and was part of what the city’s inspector general later described as an overall response that was “marked, almost without exception, by confusion and lack of coordination.” Lightfoot also faced sharp criticism late last year for her administration’s role in attempting unsuccessfully to prevent the release of footage from a botched early 2019 raid in which police targeted the wrong home, leaving Anjanette Young naked and handcuffed as police searched her home. Lightfoot said in December that all officers involved in the raid had been “taken off the street” and placed on desk duty. Mark Flessner, the top attorney for the city’s law department — which reports to Lightfoot and asked a federal judge to stop CNN affiliate WBBM from airing footage of the raid, then later sought sanctions against Young and her attorney — resigned. She also proposed new policies that would require search warrants to be approved by a deputy chief or higher-ranking official, compared to the current requirement of a lieutenant’s approval, and for new limitations on “no-knock” warrants. She also drew criticism from some police reform advocates when she dismissed progressive calls to defund the police as a “nice hashtag” and later spent $281.5 million in federal coronavirus stimulus money to cover the Chicago Police Department’s payroll. In her nearly two years as mayor, Lightfoot has at times acknowledged the different realities of campaigning and governing. She has dropped another centerpiece of her campaign — her support for an elected Chicago school board — and instead is backing a measure Illinois lawmakers are currently considering that would instead allow voters to elect a minority of board members while the mayor continues to appoint the majority. After a lengthy fight with the Chicago Teachers Union over re-opening schools amid the pandemic, Lightfoot told the New York Times in February that her control of schools was essential, and did not allow unions to “dictate what the state of play was going to be in education.” “We would never have opened without mayoral control. It’s quite clear,” Lightfoot said. John Catanzara, the Chicago police union president, on CNN last week defended the officer who shot Toledo and pointed his finger at high schools still not being open for in-person learning. “If the school doing its job and teaching students in person, maybe a counselor would have been able to reach this kid and the gangs didn’t,” he said. Lightfoot responds to Toledo shooting Lightfoot, 58, is an attorney who worked as a federal prosecutor and in several roles in Chicago’s government before moving into private practice. She returned to a government role in 2015, when then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed her to helm the Chicago Police Board and later as chair of a Police Accountability Task Force. She butted heads with Emanuel, whose efforts to avoid federal oversight of the Chicago Police Department she called “fundamentally flawed,” and resigned in May 2018 before launching her own mayoral campaign as a first-time candidate for office. In 2020, Lightfoot’s first full year in office, shootings and murders in Chicago rose more than 50%, according to police. That was part of a nationwide trend that police said was related to the coronavirus pandemic and civil unrest. Carjackings also doubled in Chicago in 2020. And as of March 28 of this year, Chicago had 129 homicide cases, about 33 percent more than at the same time in 2020, according to the Chicago Police Department. Reforms implemented after the McDonald shooting, and as a result of a court-ordered consent decree, have not yet fully been implemented. And the Toledo shooting again left Lightfoot responding to the actions of a police department she had pledged to reform. Lightfoot acknowledged Thursday that Chicago is “a city that is traumatized by a long history of police violence and misconduct.” Still, she urged people to “wait until we hear all the facts” before making up their minds about the case. The mayor also said the city needs to do more to combat the availability of guns. “We must do everything we can also to eliminate the scourge of firearms from our city,” she said. “We have too many damn guns on our streets.” Lightfoot has also again called for new Chicago Police Department policies, this time seeking to limit when police conduct foot pursuits. “Foot pursuits put everyone involved at risk, the officers, the person being pursued and bystanders,” Lightfoot said. “We have to do better, and I charge the superintendent with bringing to me a policy that recognizes how dangerous this is. We can’t afford to lose more lives.” But her statement didn’t fully grapple with the realities that had infuriated so many in Chicago, including a prosecutor for Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx’s office having implied in court that Toledo was holding a gun in his hand at the time of the shooting when, in fact, Toledo’s hands were empty and raised in the air. That disparity provoked outrage both in Chicago and across the nation. “The prosecution said that he had a gun in his hand. He did not,” tweeted Missouri Democratic Rep. Cori Bush, a former Black Lives Matter organizer who marched on the streets of Ferguson in 2014, when the movement began. “How many more Black and brown babies have to die before you realize that the policing system is designed to kill us with impunity?” Illinois state Rep. Edgar Gonzalez, whose district includes Little Village, where Toledo was shot, put voice to the anger and frustration the 13-year-old’s killing had reignited. “If you put your hands up, they shoot. If you put your hands down, they shoot. If you walk, you run, you hide, you sleep, you do exactly as they say, they still shoot,” Gonzalez said on the House floor Friday. “What are we supposed to do?” Source link Orbem News #Adam #Chicago #Lightfoot #LoriLightfootunderpressuretoreformpoliceaftervideoofAdamToledoshootingisreleased-CNNPolitics #Mayor #OUTRAGE #Police #Politics #pressure #Reform #shooting #Toledo
0 notes
dipulb3 · 3 years
Text
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot under pressure to reform police amid outrage over Adam Toledo shooting
New Post has been published on https://appradab.com/chicago-mayor-lightfoot-under-pressure-to-reform-police-amid-outrage-over-adam-toledo-shooting/
Chicago Mayor Lightfoot under pressure to reform police amid outrage over Adam Toledo shooting
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The city is in the midst of another weekend of protests over the actions of police, and Lightfoot is under pressure to back major reforms to a police department facing scrutiny over a series of controversial uses of violence.
“Simply put, we failed Adam. And we cannot afford to fail one more young person in our city,” Lightfoot said ahead of the release of the video by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability, which is investigating the March shooting.
Lightfoot was elected mayor in 2019 as a first-time candidate for office who had recently served as president of the Chicago Police Board. She had chaired the Police Accountability Task Force that had been launched after the 2014 police killing of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald — a shooting that also triggered a federal civil rights probe of the Chicago Police Department.
That task force’s recommendation for a civilian commission to oversee police then became a central plank in Lightfoot’s agenda as she campaigned for mayor.
But, nearly two years into Lightfoot’s tenure, she has not introduced her own plan to create civilian oversight of police — despite having pledged to do so within her first 100 days in office, and despite the idea being a product of the task force Lightfoot once led.
Two police reform advocacy groups have introduced a series of reforms that would allow Chicago voters to decide in a binding referendum whether to hand a civilian oversight board the power to hire and fire the police superintendent, set Chicago Police Department policy and negotiate police contracts.
Lightfoot has balked at that measure, which could strip that authority from the mayor’s office over what’s become the central issue she has faced — and one for which voters would likely hold her responsible.
Members of Chicago’s city council — including those who have been Lightfoot’s allies — expressed frustration that she hasn’t offered a police reform proposal of her own.
Chicago Alderman Gilbert Villegas, who resigned from his role as Lightfoot’s chosen floor leader on the city council in February, said the council should vote on those proposed reforms.
“The reality is, time is of the essence. We’ve been talking about this for decades. The mayor talked about doing this in 100 days, and we’re going on two years. We need to do this now,” he said. “The mayor has had two years to put forward something. She has not. And so given the time that we’re in right now, we need to move on this as soon as possible.”
“As we delay it,” Villegas said, “we’re losing the public’s trust.”
Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor said Lightfoot “definitely has not kept her word when it comes to policing, which is why we’re still in the space where other cities have moved forward to implement reforms and Chicago has not.”
“You can’t expect the police to police the police,” Taylor said. “She is stopping this from getting done.”
Taylor, who has advocated reforms such as eliminating qualified immunity for police and shifting funding from the police department to community organizations, said she doesn’t expect Lightfoot to ultimately back the sort of major reforms she believes the Chicago Police Department needs.
“It’s going to be something watered down and it’s not going to make any sense. It’s not going to come from the people,” Taylor said. “All you’ve got to do is listen to the organizations. They’ve done the research, they’ve lived it, they’ve got the proof.”
Lightfoot’s office did not respond Friday to questions about her position on the advocacy groups’ proposal, or when she’ll release her own proposal.
The Chicago Sun-Times reported that she had addressed the issue in March during a virtual panel on criminal justice reform sponsored by the University of California, Berkeley.
“This is going to be one of most important policy decisions that is made by the city of Chicago in decades. … Really recalibrating the relationship between the people and the police,” Lightfoot said then.
“We’ve got to get this right … so we are actually setting these proposals up for success and not failure,” she said.
Two years of police controversies
The fallout from the shooting of Toledo is the latest in a series of controversies Lightfoot has faced over police actions in her nearly two years in office.
In summer 2020, Lightfoot repeatedly ordered the bridges that provide access to downtown Chicago raised at night after protests over the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd were accompanied by property destruction. The move carried heavy symbolism — with critics saying it favored businesses over the rights of the city’s residents — and was part of what the city’s inspector general later described as an overall response that was “marked, almost without exception, by confusion and lack of coordination.”
Lightfoot also faced sharp criticism late last year for her administration’s role in attempting unsuccessfully to prevent the release of footage from a botched early 2019 raid in which police targeted the wrong home, leaving Anjanette Young naked and handcuffed as police searched her home.
Lightfoot said in December that all officers involved in the raid had been “taken off the street” and placed on desk duty. Mark Flessner, the top attorney for the city’s law department — which reports to Lightfoot and asked a federal judge to stop Appradab affiliate WBBM from airing footage of the raid, then later sought sanctions against Young and her attorney — resigned.
She also proposed new policies that would require search warrants to be approved by a deputy chief or higher-ranking official, compared to the current requirement of a lieutenant’s approval, and for new limitations on “no-knock” warrants.
She also drew criticism from some police reform advocates when she dismissed progressive calls to defund the police as a “nice hashtag” and later spent $281.5 million in federal coronavirus stimulus money to cover the Chicago Police Department’s payroll.
In her nearly two years as mayor, Lightfoot has at times acknowledged the different realities of campaigning and governing. She has dropped another centerpiece of her campaign — her support for an elected Chicago school board — and instead is backing a measure Illinois lawmakers are currently considering that would instead allow voters to elect a minority of board members while the mayor continues to appoint the majority.
After a lengthy fight with the Chicago Teachers Union over re-opening schools amid the pandemic, Lightfoot told the New York Times in February that her control of schools was essential, and did not allow unions to “dictate what the state of play was going to be in education.”
“We would never have opened without mayoral control. It’s quite clear,” Lightfoot said.
John Catanzara, the Chicago police union president, on Appradab last week defended the officer who shot Toledo and pointed his finger at high schools still not being open for in-person learning.
“If the school doing its job and teaching students in person, maybe a counselor would have been able to reach this kid and the gangs didn’t,” he said.
Lightfoot responds to Toledo shooting
Lightfoot, 58, is an attorney who worked as a federal prosecutor and in several roles in Chicago’s government before moving into private practice. She returned to a government role in 2015, when then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel appointed her to helm the Chicago Police Board and later as chair of a Police Accountability Task Force. She butted heads with Emanuel, whose efforts to avoid federal oversight of the Chicago Police Department she called “fundamentally flawed,” and resigned in May 2018 before launching her own mayoral campaign as a first-time candidate for office.
In 2020, Lightfoot’s first full year in office, shootings and murders in Chicago rose more than 50%, according to police. That was part of a nationwide trend that police said was related to the coronavirus pandemic and civil unrest. Carjackings also doubled in Chicago in 2020. And as of March 28 of this year, Chicago had 129 homicide cases, about 33 percent more than at the same time in 2020, according to the Chicago Police Department.
Reforms implemented after the McDonald shooting, and as a result of a court-ordered consent decree, have not yet fully been implemented. And the Toledo shooting again left Lightfoot responding to the actions of a police department she had pledged to reform.
Lightfoot acknowledged Thursday that Chicago is “a city that is traumatized by a long history of police violence and misconduct.” Still, she urged people to “wait until we hear all the facts” before making up their minds about the case.
The mayor also said the city needs to do more to combat the availability of guns.
“We must do everything we can also to eliminate the scourge of firearms from our city,” she said. “We have too many damn guns on our streets.”
Lightfoot has also again called for new Chicago Police Department policies, this time seeking to limit when police conduct foot pursuits.
“Foot pursuits put everyone involved at risk, the officers, the person being pursued and bystanders,” Lightfoot said. “We have to do better, and I charge the superintendent with bringing to me a policy that recognizes how dangerous this is. We can’t afford to lose more lives.”
But her statement didn’t fully grapple with the realities that had infuriated so many in Chicago, including a prosecutor for Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx’s office having implied in court that Toledo was holding a gun in his hand at the time of the shooting when, in fact, Toledo’s hands were empty and raised in the air.
That disparity provoked outrage both in Chicago and across the nation.
“The prosecution said that he had a gun in his hand. He did not,” tweeted Missouri Democratic Rep. Cori Bush, a former Black Lives Matter organizer who marched on the streets of Ferguson in 2014, when the movement began. “How many more Black and brown babies have to die before you realize that the policing system is designed to kill us with impunity?”
Illinois state Rep. Edgar Gonzalez, whose district includes Little Village, where Toledo was shot, put voice to the anger and frustration the 13-year-old’s killing had reignited.
“If you put your hands up, they shoot. If you put your hands down, they shoot. If you walk, you run, you hide, you sleep, you do exactly as they say, they still shoot,” Gonzalez said on the House floor Friday. “What are we supposed to do?”
0 notes
xtruss · 4 years
Text
Trump “has blood on his hands,” says Pulitzer-winning Boston Globe
— April 2, 2020 | 12:33 PM CDT | BY JOHN WOJCIK
Tumblr media
In a powerful editorial the Pulitzer Prize-winning Boston Globe, not known for espousing liberal or left viewpoints, is condemning President Trump as “unfit for a pandemic.”
“Much of the suffering and death coming was predictable. The president has blood on his hands,” the Globe says in its sweeping condemnation of the president for not initiating a unified, competent federal response to the crisis.
The editorial comes as hospitals load the bodies from their overflowing morgues into refrigerated trucks pulling up outside their doors.
It comes as Americans fear the worst of the suffering and death is still yet to come.
“It’s worth remembering that the reach of the virus here is not attributable to an act of God or a foreign invasion, but a colossal failure of leadership,” the paper declared.
“It begged for a president to deliver clear, consistent, scientifically sound messages on the state of the epidemic and its solutions, to reassure the public amid their fear, and to provide steady guidance to cities and states. And it demanded a leader who would put the country’s well-being first, above near-term stock market returns and his own re-election prospects, and who would work with other nations to stem the tide of COVID-19 cases around the world.”
The editors also took issue with the Trump TV show presented by the president and his “team” during prime news time every evening. During these shows, the editors say, Trump “embodies callousness, self-concern, and lack of compass.”
The Trump administration’s “critical errors,” the editors warn, “will cost thousands if not hundreds of thousands of American lives,” and “come November, there must be a reckoning for the lives lost, and for the vast, avoidable suffering about to ensue under the president’s watch.”
Bina Venkataraman, the Boston Globe’s editorial page editor, insisted that the charge the president has blood on his hands is in no way an exaggeration.
She said that when Trump was telling the country there were only 15 cases and that they were “going down to zero very soon,” he had the information about what was really coming. She said that her newspaper has maintained a long list of statements and promises the president has made since he told that initial lie about the pandemic back in January. She called it a “long list of lies.”
Even yesterday, on the daily Trump show, the president said that he was holding back 10,000 ventilators in the national stockpile so they could be available where needed.
Today we learn from the CDC that the stockpiles of protective equipment are almost empty and that the small number of ventilators on hand in that stockpile are themselves broken or otherwise inoperable. It turns out that a year ago Trump canceled the maintenance program designed to keep them in good, usable shape. The government in the last few weeks, in an act of criminal neglect at best, sent out up to 10,000 ventilators that do not work.
In Massachusetts, it appears, the Trump administration actually stopped a shipment of protective equipment headed for that state. The shipment was from a private contractor dealing with the state. The feds stopped the shipment and delivered it to a location still unknown. States which Trump carried in the last election, unlike the Bay State, are receiving the materials they order.
Illinois, which has a Democratic governor, was recently told to expect 300,000 good quality N95 masks for use by health care providers. Instead they received 300,000 of the paper surgical masks that cost 25 cents apiece to produce.
The lack of a centralized, federal response to the pandemic has left Americans with confusing and conflicting information. Every day, for example, the nation sees diagrams of infection curves and hears dates on which the apex is expected to be reached. Other experts note, however, that epidemics come in waves and that the reaching of that first apex in no way indicates that we are out of the woods.
There have been conflicting reports on the usefulness of wearing masks.
Daily we hear new official figures on the progress of the disease. Today, for example, the confirmed number of infected is around a quarter of a million, nationally. But on Tuesday, Dr. Robert Redfield, the chief of the CDC, said information suggests that as many as 25% of infected individuals are asymptomatic and are spreading the virus without knowing. Without a massive increase in testing, though, even this number is impossible to verify. Redfield himself has been absent from the daily briefings recently, despite the fact that one would expect the leader of the CDC to be a major participant.
Dr. Luciana Borio, a former member of the National Security Council under President Obama, had both her pandemic readiness unit and her job eliminated when Trump took over.
She noted yesterday her displeasure with the focus on “reaching the apex.” The day after the apex is reached, she said, “will be the second worst day of the crisis,” and even then there is no coordinated federal plan yet for the coming waves. “The focus on the curve,” she said, “is misleading; epidemics come in waves.”
There has been talk of the pandemic possibly taking a respite in the hot months of summer. “We don’t know that for sure,” she said, and she pointed out that even if that happens, testing will be paramount to find out where we are and where we have to go. Trump has said, of course, that the testing problem is solved, and when Vice President Pence was asked yesterday what happened to the more than 4,000,000 tests he had promised weeks ago, he gave only an evasive answer.
Yesterday, Trump canceled the coming Obamacare enrollment period for people who don’t have health insurance. He refused to answer a question about this and turned the mic over to Pence, who also failed to answer, saying only that people could apply for Medicaid. Many states carried by Trump in the last election, of course, have cut off that option for their citizens.
Weeks ago, the Pentagon said it had 2,000 ventilators available to send out to the states. As of yesterday, it said no one from the federal government has told them what to do with those ventilators.
Failure to set up a national supply chain is creating problems that clearly amount to criminal neglect.
A private company that has made 280 million protective masks, for example, is selling and shipping them to companies and countries overseas at the very time healthcare workers in the U.S. are dying for lack of that equipment.
FEMA yesterday said it has not taken any action one way or the other on this situation.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said this morning that there is a move underway in Congress to begin setting up an investigation into how the pandemic crisis is being managed. Such a probe can’t come a moment too soon.
— Peoplesworld.Org
0 notes
obtusemedia · 5 years
Text
In Ascending Order: Ranking Taylor Swift’s singles worst to best
Tumblr media
After slowly tilting her sound away from Nashville more and more with each album, Taylor Swift made a clean break from country five years ago with her synthpop masterpiece, 1989. It was about as successful as a pop album could be, producing three massive #1 hits and cementing Swift as the world’s biggest popstar.
Fast forward three years, and her next album, reputation, was bitter and moody — a good fit for the American landscape of 2017, but a far cry from the bright melodies and fun sing-a-longs of her previous smashes, Red and 1989. The lead single hit #1, but quickly stumbled down the charts and the album’s follow-up singles didn’t have the same impact. But you’ll still find those who defend reputation, and a year and a half later, it’s clear there are some gems hidden in the wreckage. 
Now that Swift is entering her 30th year of life with a catalogue that’s ran the gamut from country-fried ballads about teen crushes to vengeful electropop bangers about Kanye West, I thought it was a good time to look back on her career. Because despite her negative (sorry) reputation right now, Swift has contributed many great songs to the modern pop canon.
Here’s the ground rules: The song had to be a single from one of Taylor Swift’s six albums. No deep cuts (apologies to “All Too Well”), no soundtrack tunes (sorry, Fifty Shades) and no featured spots on others’ songs (asking me to listen voluntarily to John Mayer is too much to ask, sorry).
#37: “End Game” feat. Future and Ed Sheeran (reputation, 2017)
Listen, Taylor, if you want to have guest rappers on your single, that’s fine. But maybe get, you know, actual rappers. Ed Sheeran doing his awkward schtick certainly does not count. If this was a hip-hop flavored pop song, fine — then why is legitimate rapper Future here? The Atlanta trap icon feels so out of place on this gentrified R&B cut, and he only gets a few bars anyways, making his appearance seem more like Swift wanting cred more than anything else.
Honestly, if that was the only problem, “End Game” wouldn’t be last place on this list. But nope, the song itself is a giant mess in itself. The production aims for sexy and nocturnal and lands in lethargic. And what is this song even about? Is Taylor making a song about how cool she and her boyfriend are, or about her negative reputation? The post-chorus, which suddenly veers into that later topic, tries so desperately to be a chant-along and it falls utterly flat.
With all of Swift’s other singles, even the ones I don’t like, I at least understand how someone could like it. But I have no clue who “End Game” is for, or who would enjoy listening to it.
#36: “Ours” (Speak Now, 2010)
I’ve listened to this song many times, and I find it hard to remember a single hook or line. “Ours” isn’t aggressively awful, but it is painfully bland, and I have no plans on listening to this nondescript ballad after I’m done writing this.
#35: “Fifteen” (Fearless, 2008)
I can’t take away the good intentions of “Fifteen.” The general message of being wary of manipulative older men (or, in this case, high school seniors) and enjoying youth while it lasts is nice, if a bit cliché.
But this song still bugs me. Swift sings the story of her and her (real-life!) friend Abigail’s experiences as ninth-graders like she’s a wise elder, looking back with years of experience. But she was only 18 when she wrote “Fifteen” — I’m sure she matured some in those three years, but once you realize that, it makes the whole song come off as fairly condescending.
Couple the after-school special lyrics with a sickeningly sweet acoustic guitar musical style, and “Fifteen” doesn’t hit the mark.
#34: “Gorgeous” (reputation)
The lyrics aren’t the problem here (except that any Angeleno knows that at the intersection of Sunset and Vine, it’s just a Walgreens). Nah, it’s the shrink-wrapped production that drives me nuts. There was the potential for a great, 1989-esque pop song here, but it got neutered.
#33: “Mean” (Speak Now)
Given that Swift eventually became the music industry’s Regina George, this song has aged horribly. Also, this sounds way too much like the Country Bear Jamboree for me to take it seriously.
#32: “Bad Blood” feat. Kendrick Lamar (1989, 2014)
The worst song from Swift’s best album, “Bad Blood” is a clunky mess that frankly doesn’t go hard enough. If you’re going to make a diss track towards Katy Perry, go for the kill shot! Prism was mediocre, her whole look was tacky, she wrote this disaster — Swift had plenty of options. But I guess she felt adding a couple phoned-in Kendrick Lamar verses, getting Selena Gomez and Lena Dunham (??) in the music video, and spouting clichés did the job better. *shrugs* At least it’s catchy.
(Side note: Perry obviously lost that feud, but “Teenage Dream” is absolutely flawless and probably better than any song Swift wrote)
#31: “Everything Has Changed” feat. Ed Sheeran (Red, 2012)
“Everything Has Changed” has a gorgeous, wilting chorus, and Swift and Sheeran have clear chemistry. Beyond that, it’s unfortunately kind of forgettable.
#30: “Fearless” (Fearless)
I’m honestly not sure why this needed to be a single. It’s fine and all, but it doesn’t stick in the brain compared to Fearless’ other smash hits.
#29: “New Year’s Day” (reputation)
Ending the brash reputation with a quiet, sparse piano ballad was a smart move, and the bittersweet “New Year’s Day” is a solid enough tune. 
But here’s the thing — Swift wasn’t the only popstar in 2018 to put a minimalist, Jack Antonoff-produced piano song on her album. Lorde did nearly the exact same thing just a few months earlier with the heartbreaking “Liability,” which is much rawer and more intense than “New Year’s Day.” In other words, when I hear Swift’s ballad, I enjoy it, but I find myself wishing she went for the emotional jugular like Lorde did.
#28: “Tim McGraw” (Taylor Swift, 2006)
Here’s the part where I admit that I’m really not into country music, so a lot of Swift’s very early material isn’t for me. But, like with other genres I don’t love, I can at least respect talent, and “Tim McGraw” is a great piece of detailed, nuanced songwriting. But acoustic-y country ballads will never be my favorite.
#27: “The Last Time” feat. Gary Lightbody (Red)
Here, we have the opposite situation as “Tim McGraw” — a musical style I love, but not done very well.
These types of Coldplay-esque, faux-indie power ballads were totally my thing back in the day (shoutout to The Fray and obviously, Coldplay). But although “The Last Time” does have real bonafides with its soaring chorus, great guitar solo, and Snow Patrol frontman Gary Lightbody contributing vocals, it just doesn’t click. The duo doesn’t have a lot of chemistry, and the epic feel shoots for “Chasing Cars” and lands closer to...one of Snow Patrol’s other songs that nobody remembers.
#26: “...Ready For It?” (reputation)
I’d love to just make a snarky joke about Swift trying to rap and embarrassing herself in the process (which she kind of does) ... but I can’t lie, this is a total guilty pleasure. It’s about as close to a classic Ke$ha song as we’re going to get in the gloomy late-2010′s, so I can forgive the try-hard vibe.
#25: “Our Song” (Taylor Swift)
This is the very first of Swift’s songs I ever heard. Naturally, being a 13-year-old wannabe snob at the time, I hated it immediately.
Over a decade later, I can appreciate “Our Song” for its adorable charms and extremely quotable lyrics (“when you talk reeeeeeal slow” is my personal favorite). But it still rubs me the wrong way a bit, probably because Swift was pretending to be a southern hick when she was actually raised by a wealthy family in Reading, Pennsylvania. ...but it’s still a solid pop tune.
#24: “Mine” (Speak Now)
So uh...I guess Swift really wanted to write a Bruce Springsteen song? Specifically, a more optimistic version of “The River,” with a romantically doomed teenage flame sputtering out into adult financial troubles.
But obviously, a song about a shotgun wedding and blue-collar poverty wasn’t going to sell to Swift’s audience, so she gave the trope an uplifting spin, complete with a bright, peppy chorus in a major key. And it kind of works! I’m not going to pretend that “Mine” is top-tier Taylor, but sometimes rough stories do have a happy ending.
#23: “Should’ve Said No” (Taylor Swift)
A nice and pissed-off song about a cheating boyfriend, “Should’ve Said No” has a great, visceral chorus and Swift puts 100 percent of the blame on her scummy ex, who’s trying to weasel his way back into the relationship. I will say this about country: it’s a great vehicle for breakup songs.
#22: “The Story of Us” (Speak Now)
This is a great example of a very under-used style of breakup song — the slowly-drifting-apart story. It’s not usually as fiery, but it’s a lot more realistic and relatable. The best recent example I can think of is The 1975′s new wave heartbreaker “A Change of Heart,” which admittedly, is a lot better than “The Story of Us.”
Still, Swift gives the trope a nice effort here, and the charging guitars perfectly match her growing frustration at this boy who gets more and more distant as time goes on. The book framing device is a nice twist too (“NEXT CHAPTER.”), and it all adds up to one of Swift’s more underrated singles.
#21: “Look What You Made Me Do” (reputation)
Ahh yes, the infamous Kanye West diss track. Let’s be clear, nobody looked good in this feud — Taylor came off as vindictive, back-stabbing and petty. Then Kanye lost any moral high ground by wearing MAGA hats and buddying up to Trump.
The funny thing is, the songs from both artists that are central to this feud — “Look What You Made Me Do” and Kanye’s “Famous,” the song that reignited Swift’s rage — are both deeply ridiculous songs that I love despite my better judgement. The main issue with Swift’s song is that she can’t decide whether to play the cackling villain or the victim. The smart move would’ve been to lean into her dark side, like Kanye himself did with Yeezus, but she isn’t willing to completely do that, which makes the song have a pretty awkward tone.
YET. “Look What You Made Me Do” is still way too much fun for me to hate. The “I’m Too Sexy”-aping chorus? Love it. The thumping, wonderfully stupid Black Eyed Peas-esque production? Give me more! “I’m sorry, the old Taylor can’t come to the phone right now. Why? BECAUSE SHE’S DEAD!!” — that might be my favorite part of all.
It’s a total disaster, but it’s a highly enjoyable one. But considering that I find other bombs like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP fascinating too, maybe my opinion isn’t valid on this one.
#20: “22″ (Red)
I read a tweet once that called this song the “Kidz Bop ‘Tik Tok.’” Don’t remember who wrote that, but they’re absolutely right. Not that there’s anything wrong with that! It’s probably the closest Swift came to a squeaky-clean Carly Rae Jepsen banger.
#19: “White Horse” (Fearless)
The darker cousin of “Love Story,” Swift proved with “White Horse” she could also use classic tropes to convey weepy ballads as well as the sweeping romances. I honestly wish the lyrics were a little less vague — usually Swift is hyper-specific, which serves her well in these breakup songs — but Swift’s emotive performance carries the song regardless.
#18: “Begin Again” (Red)
Musically, the sleepy sound of “Begin Again” doesn’t do a lot for me, but the lyrical detail and story are stellar. After listening to so many Taylor Swift songs about crushing heartbreak or whirlwind romances for this list, it’s nice to hear a more understated song about a first-date that goes well. It especially works well at the end of Red, a fairly angsty album. 
“Begin Again” might still have some exaggerations (nobody’s first date is that perfect, Taylor, come on now), but the more grounded, mature tone was a nice change of pace for Swift.
#17: “Shake It Off” (1989)
This song is so, so stupid. And yet I know every single word. Yes, even the incredibly awkward rap breakdown (“THIS. SICK. BEAT!”).
I can’t in good conscience name “Shake It Off” as a top-tier Swift single, but it’s damn fun, despite its awful lyrics. Which basically makes it — gasp — a Katy Perry single. Oh, the irony.
#16: “Delicate” (reputation)
Swift went nocturnal with this sleeper hit. I couldn’t get into it at first, but it eventually grew on me, with its subtle production and charmingly insecure lyrics. Who among us hasn’t nervously second-guessed everything they’ve said or done when they’re around a new romantic partner?
The vocoders and slowly building percussion just add to what was already a solid groove, and it’s no wonder that “Delicate” eventually creeped up the charts despite the fact that, as Swift said herself, her reputation’s never been worse.
#15: “Picture To Burn” (Taylor Swift)
If I’m going to enjoy a country song, it better be ridiculous and stuffed with as many goofy clichés as possible. The single can’t take itself too seriously (and should be super catchy, of course). This is why some of the few country songs I semi-ironically love sound less like George Strait and more like “Man! I Feel Like A Woman.” If all country music was as silly as “Save A Horse, Ride A Cowboy,” I’d probably like the genre a lot more.
“Picture To Burn” isn’t quite on those songs’ level, but it nearly matches the same level of yee-haw fun. Swift puts on an aggressive Southern accent, there’s a literal banjo solo at one point, and it’s about the best country topic there is: getting revenge on your ex!
Swift leaves no shot unfired as she calls out her former boyfriend for her “stupid ‘ol pickup truck you never let me drive,” calls him a stupid redneck, threatens to date all his friends and even gets her daddy involved. (At one point, the song contained a lyric about telling his friends he was gay, but thankfully, she later removed it)
It’s not quite “Honky Tonk Badonkadonk,” but it’ll do in a pinch.
#14: “Wildest Dreams” (1989)
One of the smartest things Swift’s done during her blockbuster pop era is cribbing ideas from other musicians and adapting them to her own personality. As mentioned earlier, “22″ is her version of a Ke$ha party song, “Mine” is like one of Springsteen’s heartland tunes, and “Shake It Off” is an intentionally dumb Katy Perry single.
But probably the most obvious example of this is “Wildest Dreams.” And the artist Swift cribs from on this sweeping ballad is more of a cult favorite than a true pop megastar: Lana Del Rey. Don’t lie, you hear it too: the cooing, sensual vocals, the cinematic sound, the lyrics that evoke classic Hollywood romance. It’s basically just “Summertime Sadness” without the Spaghetti western guitars.
And that’s absolutely a good thing! Although Swift doesn’t have Lana’s stunning alto vocal (sorry, but you know it’s true), she can still absolutely play that classic movie starlet role. Add a bit more modern pop structure to Del Rey’s indie-darling formula, and you’ve got the recipe for an easy standout track.
#13: “You Belong With Me” (Fearless)
Pointing out that “You Belong With Me,” arguably Swift’s biggest early hit, is problematic isn’t a new take. The idea of that someone inherently “belongs” with you because you like them has been debunked. I’m sorry this guy doesn’t you like you back Taylor, but maybe he has a good thing going with that cheer captain who wears short skirts? Let him be.
...but on the other hand, Swift was 19 when she wrote “You Belong With Me.” Most people criticizing the lyrics here are doing so through an adult vantage. Yes, the message is toxic, but it’s also extremely accurate to how teenage crushes work. I can promise you that I had similar feelings in junior high/high school, and I know I’m not alone in that regard. 
Also, “You Belong With Me” is far too catchy and bouncy to truly hate. So although I can’t rank it too high due to the iffy lyrics, I can’t deny that it does tap into some raw teen emotions, even if they’re ugly.
#12: “I Knew You Were Trouble.” (Red)
I was there. That fateful day in 2012 when Taylor Swift *gasp* MADE A DUBSTEP SONG. People were snarking that this was basically just Skrillex for the Forever 21 crowd, sharing around that (hilarious) screaming goat remix, and so on.
But seven years later, although that dubstep production is oh-so-early-’10s, “I Knew You Were Trouble” absolutely holds up. If Swift was going to abandon country, why not go all out? Besides, the drop still hits with a lot of force, mirroring the visceral anger of her lyrics. If anything, it isn’t intense enough. Maybe she really should’ve gotten Skrillex to produce...
#11: “Out Of The Woods” (1989)
YES inject that synthy Jack Antonoff production right into my veins.
I’m still upset that “Out Of The Woods” wasn’t a smash like 1989′s other singles, but it is a pretty weird song. The chorus is aggressively repetitive (its only real flaw), it’s a breakup song that’s less relatable lyrically and more abstract, and America was too busy paying attention at the time to Bieber semi-apologizing.
But THAT PRODUCTION. It’s nervy yet propulsive, with a quiet-loud-quiet setup that any good power ballad needs. Antonoff even provides some backup vocals, which is always a welcome addition. Swift herself really sells the song too. I wouldn’t say she’s a powerhouse singer, but she’s really giving it her all here in terms of vocal force — something she typically shies away from.
“Out Of The Woods” will likely be lost to time for all but the most ardent Swifties. But for those who love it, may I suggest listening to some Bleachers?
Tumblr media
#10: “Back To December” (Speak Now)
The stereotype of Swift’s breakup songs, particularly in the early stage of her career, was that they weren’t self-aware and basically demonized whatever boy the song was about (or the girl she was jealous of). And while that’s not 100 percent true, the stereotype did have some merit back then.
That’s why “Back To December” was rightfully hailed as a breath of fresh air for Swift, and it’s held up extremely well nine years later. The perspective has shifted — in this story, she’s the one admitting guilt for ending the relationship. It’s a very measured, mature song, but with still enough tender emotion and regret to stay relatable. The orchestral sweep is a nice touch as well, emphasizing the tragedy of the situation.
Also, fun fact: This song is about Swift’s relationship with Twilight hunk Taylor Lautner. Maybe the relationship didn’t work out because she thought it was weird to date a guy with the same name? It was probably because she’s more of a Hunger Games fan.
Tumblr media
#9: “Getaway Car” (reputation)
Here’s the one thing reputation improved upon from 1989. As just a cursory listen could tell you, “Getaway Car,” sonically, is extremely similar to “Out Of The Woods.” They’re both pulsing, synthy new wave tracks with a heavy Bleachers influence — considering they’re both Antonoff productions, not surprising at all. It even steals a lyric from Bleachers’ “Rollercoaster.”
So what makes “Getaway Car” a superior sequel? Well, it’s a smoother ride, for sure — the aggressively repetitive chorus in “Out Of The Woods” was that song’s weak spot. And “Getaway” has a more clear concept as well, being about a Bonnie and Clyde-inspired escape from a failing relationship, invoking all the bittersweet emotions that come along with that. “Out Of The Woods” is...about a car crash with Harry Styles? I guess?
It’s really a personal call. They’re both amazing songs, I just happen to think Swift and Antonoff refined their collaboration on this later attempt.
Tumblr media
#8: “Teardrops On My Guitar” (Taylor Swift)
“Teardrops On My Guitar” is both obviously written by a 15-year-old kid, but also so, so much better than that implies. 
The lyrics here are extremely wholesome and corny — unlike “You Belong With Me,” Swift doesn’t even take any shots at the girl her crush is currently dating, and there’s references to “wishing stars,” something I think I’ve only ever heard in Disney songs. And like many of Swift’s early songs, it absolutely nails the yearning emotions of a teenage crush, especially for those of us who were too shy to do anything about them.
But obviously, Swift wasn’t an average ninth-grader. The lilting melody in the verses of “Teardrops” fits the lyrics perfectly. And the song comes off both very polished and radio-ready, yet still plucked right from the pages of a diary. Yes, Swift co-wrote the song with pop-country songwriter Liz Rose, but that’s not unusual for a very young artist. Lorde’s “Royals” (written at age 16) had a co-writer, too.
The simple beauty of “Teardrops” is what brought Swift into the mainstream, and there’s a good reason for that: it’s an incredible start to a career.
Tumblr media
#7: “Blank Space” (1989)
“Blank Space” might be the only intentional, successful self-own in recent pop history. I can’t think of another time when an artist eviscerated their public persona with such surgical precision, and it actually made them more endearing.
Tired of trolls constantly making jokes about her short relationships and constant breakup songs, Swift decided to make the joke herself, 8 Mile-style. In “Blank Space,” she paints herself as a psychotic maneater who will drive any guy insane. Out of all her disses over the years, she might have saved the best barb for herself: “Darling, I’m a nightmare dressed like a daydream.” The instant tone switch from the cooing, seductive first verse to the furious, delusional second verse is brilliant.
If there’s one flaw to “Blank Space,” it’s that the production is maybe a tad too minimalist for such an intense song. But the hook is still massive, and the song isn’t about the production anyways: It’s 100 percent a lyrical showcase for Swift, and a way to beat her haters at their own game. 
Dissing yourself while still coming off smart is a tough tightrope to walk, as “Look What You Made Me Do” unfortunately proved. But with “Blank Space,” Taylor proved that, even if for a brief moment, she controlled the narrative.
(Also, this is Taylor’s best video. Obviously.)
Tumblr media
#6: “Sparks Fly” (Speak Now)
A lot of the other songs in this top 10 work because of a very specific reason, whether it be the production or a clever lyrical conceit. But it’s difficult to describe what makes “Sparks Fly” fly so well. 
At first glance, it’s not that much different than other early upbeat Swift singles — it’s got the country-rock guitars, lovesick lyrics, a bit of a twang but not too much. But this is where that formula reaches perfection. It’s no wonder that after “Speak Now,” Swift tilted hard into pure pop, because she wasn’t going to top this.
The chorus is passionate and soaring, with even the percussive lyrics ( “Drop. Everything. Now.”) contributing. And this seems like a super-odd aspect of a Taylor Swift song to compliment, but “Sparks Fly” also has a fantastic guitar riff — something few of her pop contemporaries would try.
Sometimes what makes a song great is to just have every aspect go perfectly, and that’s exactly what happened with “Sparks Fly.”
Tumblr media
#5: “Red” (Red)
The title track to Swift’s instant-classic album Red is the closest she’s come to being a full-fledged rockstar (well, that and album cut “State Of Grace,” which is an obvious U2 pastiche). It’s definitely more of a country-fried, Sheryl Crow brand of rock, but it suits Swift well. There’s even a killer guitar solo!
As a summation of a whirlwind relationship, “Red” absolutely nails the bittersweet feelings that come after a breakup. Even the best moments or aspects of her ex have a dark side, but she seems equally wistful about the worst moments. And the color-based chorus (a few years before Halsey stole the idea), complete with a new wave-y vocal echo, is simple but effective. It’s the perfect middle between Swift’s uber-pop era to come and her Nashville songwriter past.
Tumblr media
#4: “New Romantics” (1989)
I was hesitant to include “New Romantics” on this list. Yes, it was a single, but it was also a tacked-on bonus track to 1989. But it’s too damn perfect of a pop song to leave off.
Honestly, how was this not included in the regular tracklisting of 1989? Yes, it’s her best album, so there’s not a lot of filler, but “New Romantics” would’ve still been an improvement over nearly all of the songs there. The production by pop wizards Max Martin and Shellback pops and whizzes with energy. It’s pure ‘80s heaven, with an anthemic sing-along chorus and bouncy synths and drum machines.
But naturally, Swift herself is a major factor to why “New Romantics” is such an effective pop song. Her vocal delivery here has a knowing wink, with a bit of snark. You might even call it Debbie Harry-esque. For a song where Swift is conveying the joys of non-stop partying, she certainly sells it. And I’d imagine if she released it as a regular single earlier in 1989′s cycle, it would’ve been another #1 smash.
Tumblr media
#3: “Love Story” (Fearless)
“Love Story” deliberately misinterprets multiple literary classics to create an uber-cheesy, ridiculous fairy tale. And it’s easily the best song of her country era, and one of the best pop songs of the ‘00s, bar none.
The star-crossed lovers angle is overdone, yes, but Swift sings about this secret relationship with such passion and earnestness that it feels fresh again. When the surprise ending comes and the boyfriend proposes (wait, aren’t they both high schoolers? Maybe wait a bit on that one, guys), it’s got all the sappiness of a Hallmark special, and yet it totally works. You can tell the then-18 Swift didn’t find this cheesy in the slightest, and her bold, passionate sincerity works.
Even the fact that the song seems to not understand what The Scarlet Letter was actually about, or how Romeo and Juliet ends, is honestly more charming than anything else. “Love Story” is like a puppy — full of boundless joy and absolutely impossible to resist, despite not being all that smart.
Tumblr media
#2: “Style” (1989)
I can’t imagine the confusion and shock that Swift’s management must have felt when she told them she wanted to record a song that sounded like the Drive soundtrack. But it was an absolutely brilliant move, and it gave us the song that will likely age better than any of Swift’s other singles.
To be fair, “Style” is much more radio-friendly than your average Chromatics single — but not by much! Swift’s vocals are less ethereal than Ruth Radelet’s, and the hooks are much more obvious. But many Chromatics songs, or songs from Drive, are already pretty catchy — Swift just needed to maximize them into a slinky-yet-explosive new wave behemoth.
The pulsating synth background and Swift’s whispery vocals make “Style” an all-time classic song for aimlessly driving around at night, yet it’s big enough to fit in with her more blunt hits. In fact, it might be the one time she actually seemed *gasp* cool. It’s too bad reputation tried so hard to recapture this dusky vibe and utterly failed, but at least we’ll always have her first attempt.
Tumblr media
#1: “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together” (Red)
It took Swift many, many tries to capture that elusive first #1 hit. But when she finally reached that pinnacle in 2012 with the gleefully venomous “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,” it made perfect sense. After all, it’s her best song.
Swift has written many breakup songs before, but she’s never had this much fun knocking down her ex — in this case, the famously sleazy John Mayer. And her digs are just so relentless and delivered with a perfect smirk. There’s the dig at Mayer listening to “some indie record that’s much cooler than mine,” which drips with sarcasm. She calls him out for his inability to fully commit, saying both that his breakups and makeups only “last about a day.” And of course, there’s also that wonderfully exasperated phone call, where Swift groans about her ex’s persistence, calling the situation “exhausting” and mocking him. 
The best part is that all of this is delivered in a sugary-sweet, insanely catchy campfire sing-along that wouldn’t leave anyone’s heads in the fall of 2012. That chorus is just so joyful and fun that you have expect the little bouncing ball to pop up next to the “WHEEE-EEE!”
It seems weird to say Swift’s best song is also her big sell-out moment, but some artists were just meant to be pure pop. And in Swift’s case, she didn’t sacrifice any of her sharp songwriting en route to a catchier, more fun sound, which created one of the most iconic pop songs of the ‘10s.
1 note · View note
daresplaining · 7 years
Note
Do you think Matt is better suited as a prosecutor, or a defence attorney, as he seems to have been most of the time? Which, in your opinion, does he seem to prefer?
    This actually doesn’t come up as much as you might think, so it’s hard to point to a specific panel and say “Hah! Yes, Matt prefers ____”. There’s also not a ton of consistency, and he will occasionally jump from defense to prosecution from one case to another without explanation. But his general trend is toward defense, and since that’s the type of law he’s practiced for most of his career, we can assume that’s what he’s most comfortable with. He hasn’t shown a particular talent for one over the other either. He’s a good lawyer no matter which side he’s on, but overall, he’d rather spend his professional life keeping innocents from going to jail than throwing bad guys in jail– which is part of the reason why he does the Daredevil thing in his off-hours. That way, he is able to balance out the occasional instance of defending people he knows are guilty. And that leads right into your other question, so we hope you don’t mind if we go ahead and answer that here too…
Tumblr media
    All the time. There’s a reason he’s been disbarred so many times. (Actually, there are two reasons, but we’ll leave the Kingpin out of this for now. The problem is mostly Matt.)
Tumblr media
Judge: “Our issue is less with your sabotage of the Ogilvy case than with Nelson & Murdock’s now-disclosed history of ethics violations. Your past activities as a vigilante, as well as the questionable actions you and your partner have taken to preserve that identity, leave us no flexibility. With a heavy heart, this court hereby disbars Matthew M. Murdock and Franklin P. Nelson.”
Daredevil vol. 3 #36 by Mark Waid, Chris Samnee, and Javier Rodriguez 
    Matt is a moral guy but a very unethical lawyer, simply because he does operate on both sides of the law. Every single case he takes on is tainted in this way, because he nearly always uses his Daredevil identity and powers to gather evidence and determine guilt. At this late point in the Marvel universe (and with the exception of the period when the Superhero Registration Act was being enforced), being a vigilante doesn’t seem to be quite as illegal as it is in our world, simply because there have been so many dang superheroes around for so long. However, Matt is put on trial for vigilante activity– which we’ll be talking about later in the post– and it’s still a clear breach of legal protocol, and not what a lawyer should be doing. There’s also the factor of his powers, which he uses on a regular basis to give himself an edge, and on which he relies to an unwise degree. He hates defending guilty clients, and has gotten himself into trouble before by trying to determine guilt via heartbeat. All of this isn’t just a Matt problem, by the way– though it does tend to come up more with him than with other superhero lawyers. There’s a great issue of She-Hulk, for example, (She-Hulk (2004) #1, to be specific) where Jen loses a winning verdict because she saves the world while the trial is going on, and the judge rules that this biased the jury in her favor.    
   But Matt is the Unethical Lawyer poster child when it comes to this sort of thing, and this conflict has been a major theme in Daredevil comics, particularly within the last decade-or-so. With this in mind, we’re going to be providing just a few examples, rather than a comprehensive list of offenses.  
   The “Worlds Collide” story from volume 4 #15.1 focuses specifically on this dichotomy of legal work versus superhero work. Early in both his legal and… extralegal careers, Matt is assigned to defend a man who he apprehended as Daredevil. While spending his nights trying to ascertain whether his client is actually guilty, in court he is put in the position of arguing against the concept of superheroes.  
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Matt: “What are his motives? What does he want? I want to know who this man, this ‘Daredevil’– who is, essentially, accusing my client of murder– I want to know who he is. Other than a criminal. We know he’s at least guilty of assault… and, in the case of the defendant, involuntary imprisonment. Consider the facts… An unknown man in a disguise attacks someone… tackles him to the ground… and yet it’s the person who was assaulted who gets arrested? This isn’t justice. And it’s not how the justice system is supposed to work.”
Daredevil vol. 4 #15.1, “Worlds Collide” by Marc Guggenheim, Peter Krause, and Matt Wilson  
   Matt is fully aware of the irony of making this argument and yet continuing to try and determine his client’s guilt as Daredevil. He knows what he’s doing is wrong, and he cares deeply about his career as a lawyer. That’s an important point that we want to make clear. It’s not just a cover/source of intel for his secret life, as jobs occasionally are for superheroes– he genuinely loves being a lawyer and cares about the legal system. But even in this story, at this early point in his career, he feels justified in taking massive liberties with the law for the sake of ensuring that justice is actually done. He’s a self-assured enough person to believe that he knows best, and that his interventions as Daredevil are fair and necessary. That doesn’t mean they are– but that’s his mindset, and it always has been.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Matt: “A man murders. He leaves clues. He did it. He’s guilty. He’ll pay for the crime. Simple. That’s the beauty of justice. Daredevil tracks him, Matt Murdock makes him pay. Simple, gorgeous justice. When I’m poor, blind Matt Murdock, it’s easy to believe in the law, in the courts. Why is it, soon as I put on this suit– I feel that belief cracking? Doesn’t matter. Tonight will be different. I’ll reel the killer in, and the courts’ll get him locked up for life. Pure, beautiful justice.”
Daredevil vol. 1 #251 by Ann Nocenti, John Romita, Jr., and Christie Scheele
    (By the way, this is a good example of what we were referring to in response to your first question. Matt is thinking like a prosecutor here.)
    To explain his willingness to cross these lines– if not to necessarily justify it– we need to look back at his origin story. A key part of his decision to become Daredevil in the first places was the fact that his father’s killers didn’t go to jail for their crime– and I’m partial to renditions of his origin that make clear that he only goes after the Fixer and friends himself after they’ve been put on trial.
Tumblr media
Matt: “We did it all by the book. The police weren’t surprised that Sweeney and Slade were involved and it wasn’t long before they were arrested. But, on the day of the bail hearing, suddenly, they had some Park Avenue attorney. His hair gel cost more than what Foggy and I were wearing.”
Daredevil: Yellow #1 by Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale   
   He sees justice fail, and so steps in to pick up the slack. Whether this was a good move on his part is up for debate. He unintentionally causes the Fixer to die of a heart attack long before he has a chance to go to jail, for instance, which is a moral issue all on its own. But with this inciting, highly personal incident always in the back of his mind, and as his legal career continues to show him the gaps and weaknesses in the system, he feels continually justified in filling in the cracks with his own brand of crimefighting.
    But credit where credit is due– right now, at this very moment in the current run (spoiler alert!), Matt is taking steps to address this issue. He and the D.A.’s office are attempting to set precedent for allowing superheroes to legally contribute their skills and testimony to criminal investigations, without being forced to reveal their identities.  
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Matt: “Slug’s gang escaped, but we got him, and I picked up plenty of evidence with my super-senses. If the judge lets me testify, I can put him away, and maybe get him to turn over on his crew. It is legal. I’m sure of it. And if I can pull this off… if I can testify without taking off my mask, then we all can. Any secret identity hero. Spider-Man… even Blindspot. […] It could change everything. Our powers let us gather evidence the cops just can’t. If we can present it in court, legally… no more tying up bad guys, leaving them for the police and praying the system can get a conviction. We can be part of the process from start to finish.”
Daredevil vol. 5 #22 by Charles Soule, Goran Sudzuka, and Matt Milla
    This still doesn’t seem to address the fact that Matt is both a superhero and a lawyer, and is still free and willing to interfere in questionable ways in his own cases with no oversight– but hey, it’s still a big deal.  
    Generally, the instances of Matt behaving unethically that are emphasized within the narrative specially for being unethical, involve Matt trying to protect his life as Daredevil. His identity has been leaked to the press twice. The first time, fortunately, the journalist was discredited before the story got too far or Matt had to make any big moves. But the second time, when his secret identity is printed on the front page of the Daily Globe (not to be confused with the Daily Bugle) during Bendis’s run, he is forced to choose between accepting the charges or lying, both in public and in court. He opts for lying (with Foggy’s full-if-uncomfortable support), and the two of them even go so far as to sue the Globe for libel.
Tumblr media
Foggy: “Working either side of the law? This means Matt Murdock defrauded the American justice system by faking a trial against Daredevil. And that’s just the most recent example. Matt– you can’t. You can’t come clean. You can’t come out. First? You’ll get disbarred. And then… then you go to jail. You know I’m right, pal. So the thing we do? We fight this. […] We get up on the highest tree and we scream: liars! We sue everyone in sight until their heads spin off their bodies.”
Daredevil vol. 2 #33 by Brian Michael Bendis, Alex Maleev, and Matt Hollingsworth
    When he is put on trial for operating as a vigilante, Matt contemplates fighting his way out of the courtroom and just running away, before deciding to plead not guilty. He does, notably, feel bad about all this later, and reflects on it in volume 3 #36 when he finally decides to out himself as Daredevil. But that certainly hasn’t stopped him from lying and playing with the law since.
    Arguably the most egregious– and certainly the most memorable– example of Matt’s shaky legal ethics (which Foggy references in the excerpt above) is the “Playing to the Camera” arc (DD vol. 2 #20-25). This plotline centers around Matt and Foggy getting hired to sue Daredevil, allegedly for causing some major property damage. Matt knows he didn’t do it, and is affronted that his honor is being impinged by some troublemaker pretending to be Daredevil. Despite the obvious immorality such a thing would involve, and Foggy’s protestations, Matt takes the case to keep control of it and prevent other lawyers from snooping around in Daredevil’s business.    
Tumblr media
Matt: “Foggy, if we don’t take the case, Griggs’ll keep at it until he finds someone who will. Like Claude Unger. And the last thing Daredevil needs is Claude Unger poking around in his life.”
Foggy: “We can’t do it, Matt! It’s insane! To say nothing of the ethics! Allowing yourself to be hired to sue yourself– it’s illegal! You could be disbarred!”
Matt: “It’ll die on the vine. Remember, the case has no merit. Once we investigate and I find this imposter, it falls apart, end of story. It’ll be over inside of a week.”
Daredevil vol. 2 #20 by Bob Gale, Phil Winslade, James Hodgkins, et al.
   Surprise– it’s not over inside of a week, and it does go to court, and Matt finds himself in the position of having to sue himself. He manages to be in two places at once by convincing Peter Parker to pretend to be Daredevil, going behind his (DD’s) lawyer’s back in the process. It’s a hilarious, utterly unethical mess– and one Matt is perfectly willing to undertake for the sake of protecting his identity.  
    In short: lawbreaking is inherent in the superhero genre, and Matt’s position as a lawyer and devotion to the proper functioning of the justice system in no way prevents him from bending legal ethics to their absolute limit.   
41 notes · View notes
hollywoodx4 · 7 years
Text
Sticking with the Schuylers (34)
(Thank you for waiting so patiently for this-I had a long week that kept trying to knock me down, but luckily I pulled through thanks to optimism and ‘Times are Hard for Dreamers’ on a constant loop. Thank the lord for Amelie).
I love John Laurens, and I love his family, and I know this fic is long but I have like 16 pages of headcanon/development so do with that what you will, I love my fic baby.
(Tagging: @ellzabethschuyler also shoutout to @oosnavi for giving me lots of really good ideas on this one and also killing me with all of the Pippa + children pictures every day.)
This is a Laurens Christmas Eve. 
1  2  3  4   5   6   7   8   9   10   1112   I  13  14   15   16   17   18A  18B   18C  I   19   20   21   22   23   24   25  26   27  28   29   I  30  31  32  33
There is a clear wall of sound coming from the fifth floor apartment, one they can hear from the moment they reach the stairwell. Alexander chuckles as Eliza’s grip on his hand changes. It's a slight movement, but he's attentive-he turns his head to face her while slowing their pace.
“That's us,” he gestures down the hall, to a row of identical doors. Eliza nods, eyes unchanging and feigning complete comfort. That being said she is good at this-excellent, even. If he hadn't known any better, he would have kept going along. But her breathing has slowed, visibly deep in her chest. The hand he holds in his has begun to pick up a moisture bred by nerves. He's more familiar with the disguised symptoms of anxiety. She is much better at this façade than he is.
“What's wrong?”
“This is a really big deal.”
“It is, it is and if you're uncomfortable-I didn't mean to push this. I  know it's a big step and I know it's only been three months and Christmas Eve is kind of huge,”
“-Alex,”
“- but it would have just felt wrong spending it without you, and,”
“-Alexander.” Her hands find his shoulders and she takes a deep breath, a silent instruction for him to do the same. She watches the rise and fall of his chest, his closed eyes, as he comes back down from his ranting. His lips have stopped moving but his mind will not silence itself, flittering back and forth between thoughts of her backing out of this and the warm beauty of her eyes on his. Her lips turn up into a gentle smile and he's instantly relaxed, taking her in from their place at the end of the hall.
“I want to be here-so badly-I’m just a little nervous.”
There was a word she hadn't associated herself with in a while. Especially not around him. Typically, Eliza prided herself in being near professional at social interaction. It was in her blood, her upbringing. Most of her childhood had been spent entertaining crowds of politicians, spinning in brand new Mary Janes and singing sweet Ella Fitzgerald in a birdsong voice while Angelica herded Peggy away from the dessert table. It is what earned her the nicknames  of Political America’s Sweetheart or The senate’s daughter. It is what made her Elizabeth Schuyler.
To say she hadn't been nervous a day in her life would be a lie; there were plenty of times-at big events, or when some small brunches-where she'd felt her heart squeeze and convulse, unable to be settled. Each of those times, it was painful. Each of those times, her hand was encased in the cold, tight hold of James Reynold’s grip. There was a suffocation, a death-sentence race of her pulse that lasted well after the event was over.
This nerve…placing a word on it, Eliza stops on butterflies. Although it's incredibly cliché, and she has to internally curse at herself for the immediate and consuming thought of the creatures floating around in her stomach. There is a striking difference, however, in the way they feel. There is no stabbing, or suffocating. The television-static fuzz that accompanies her holds a slight comfort-she knows shes supposed to be here-to be with him. And the way he holds her hands, still on his shoulders, with such a light reassurance…she can pull this type of nerve back. She can breathe with it, let it reside in the home of her body for a bit.
“We can stay here for a minute, if you need to.”
“No, it's alright. Let's go meet your family.”
The wall of sound opens up with the apartment door, and Eliza is immediately wrapped in multiple suffocating hugs. There are exclamations-in lighthearted Spanish, as she's held at arms length by a grouping of gracefully aged older women. And then there's John, who comes barreling over from the other side of the room. He has to weave his way through what seems to be wall-to-wall people, and Alexander breathes out a feigned sour expression as John moves to hug her first.
“Everyone, this is my beautiful best friend Eliza. Oh, and Alex is here too.”
Her name echoes across the room and lights up her smile-she's greeting all kinds of people; aunts, cousins, third relatives…all with a boundless poise and upbeat charisma that blows Alexander away. One of the cousins hands him a drink and before he knows it Eliza has disappeared completely, whisked into the throng of people with her own cup of liquor and arms linked with John’s all-too-eager sisters. John stays with Alexander, taking a pull from his cup before clapping a hand on his back.
“She already fits in better than you did your entire first year.”
“Shut up and get drunk, John.”
“Gladly.” His best friend smirks over the rim of his cup, freckle-dusted cheeks lifting with the expression. He implores Alexander to do the same. He shakes his head.
“Probably shouldn't drink too much-just in case, y’know?” He gestures to the space of the crowd Eliza had disappeared into, worry weaved into a laid-back voice so gently that John barely picks up on it. He rolls his eyes in response, shaking his head and taking another sip. There's a tap on Alexander’s shoulder, and when he turns around he's engulfed in a noogie-accessorized hug.
“Hey man, where's your girl?” Luis is built like a body-builder, much unlike Alexander’s scrawny legs and John’s lean figure. Standing beside the two he towers, with no resemblance between him and his younger and ‘adopted’ brother besides the bountiful crop of freckles that decorate his richly toned skin. Alexander pulls out of his hold, pressing the fabric of his casual knit sweater back into place.
“Not sure-we came in together, but Amaia and Emily stole her.”
“She’s your girl? The one from the magazines?” Alex nods, grinning, before the oldest Laurens let's out a chuckle. “Man, I would've never guessed. How did you manage that one, Hamilton?”
“Only with the charm and brains you failed to inherit, Luis.” John earns a punch in the shoulder for that one, touching the place his brother’s fist had made contact with a wince. It hadn't hurt immensely-or at all-Alex can judge by the way John’s wince barely makes his eyes shut. But he prolongs the contact, long enough for a voice to join their conversation.
“Luis Andreas what did you do to your brother? Do I need to punch you back?”
“No, Mami.”
“I don't know, it really hurts. I think he might've hit an artery or something.”
“Don't be a baby, John. Nobody likes an infant-man.” She turns her attention to Alexander, who's watching the exchange with bemused eyes. Valeria Laurens looks at him with an electric expression-slightly frantic, but always with a mother’s glowing guardianship. He relishes the way that she's begun patching the hole in his heart; the way this crazy, eclectic woman had opened her heart to him. Valeria draws him into a warm embrace, smoothing down his hair.
“And where is this girlfriend of yours? Honestly you talk so much about her to me I thought she'd be sewn to your side!”
“Oh trust me, that's not too far from the truth.” John teases Alex with an intoxication-laden flair, already tipsy. Alex and Valeria wear matching narrowed eyes.
“Knock it off, John. Alex is happy and we should all be happy for him.”  
“Like I'm not? He's dating my best friend-Hell, I  like her better than him most of the time!”
“I thought I was your best friend!”
“No, Eliza definitely is my best friend now. Sorry Alex, you've been replaced. Actually, I'll go find her. Hang here for a second.” John disappears into the throng of family, leaving Alexander and Valeria hanging by the front door. The moment they're alone she begins chatting-asking questions in such a rapid-fire pace that he can't answer them all in one go. Then, during a string of chatter involving school, her mouth snaps open in a wide ‘o’ shape, her eyes widening to a spot behind him.
A warm hand finds its way onto his shoulder, running down it in gentle motion as her lips meet his cheek. Valeria’s smile widens-Alex hadn't thought it possible.
“You’re Eliza-you're here-god, look at you, you're gorgeous!” She blushes at the compliment, cheeks lifting in an infectious expression as she reaches out her hand.
“It's really nice to meet you, Mrs. Laurens.”
“Oh please don’t call me that, it makes me feel like my mother.” She takes Eliza’s outstretched hand and pulls her into a hug, rubbing her back in the same tender way that she had Alex’s. “Valeria.”
“You have a wonderful home-it’s so full, and you’ve all been so nice. I really appreciate you inviting me, thank you so much.” John looks between his mother and Eliza and shakes his head-in an instant his mother has turned to putty by Eliza’s soft-spoken words. Although he knows that she’s being genuine he nudges Alex’s shoulder, laughing.
“Once again, she charms her way through a room of people in less than twenty seconds. Meanwhile, Kevin still won’t talk to me after what happened with beer pong last year.” A drop of hot sauce, a flipped table…John cringes at the memory. And apparently, Kevin still is, too. The aforementioned second-cousin has refused his company so far, straying away from each part of the room he’d been in. Instead he’d moved to the balcony, where he and Luis had gathered enough people to start some freewheeling card-game the older boys had invented when they were John’s age just to bet their extra cash. It’s stupid, and unnecessary, he thinks as he watches them from the other side of the room. But being invited to their circle wouldn’t hurt.
               Valeria Laurens had been blessed with six mouths to feed; three boys and three girls. While the balance was aesthetically perfect, the hurdles continually presented themselves in the form of food fights, the three bedroom apartment feeling over-capacity, and a boy stuck between her girls who hadn’t been happy about it for a long time. John had been a trooper, for the most part. He got along well enough with the girls, who often put ribbons in his short curls and dressed him like their doll. Amaia, a year and a half older than him, was more level about these games. She did, however, egg on Emily. Sweet Emily loved her Irish twin of a brother more than anything; would follow him around, dote on him, and speak the world about him to her friends. As children, John often found her to be annoying or childish. It was, after all, what his brothers would say. But Emily was his confidant-she listened to him more than Amaia ever had time for, never teased him like Luis or Kevin would. She was his favorite sibling-still is, he considers from time to time. While the others were often busy in their own lives (even Mari, who is still in high school and with a bigger social life than all of them combined) John and Emily found favor in each other’s company. She was never too busy to talk to him. She was always there-just as she always had been.
               When the door to their apartment swings open, and Emily Laurens is able to catch a glimpse of the newcomers over the tops of everyone’s heads, she’s the first to make her way to the door. There is a scowl painted on her full lips and she grabs for her older sister’s arm as she flies by her, pressing hard with the tips of her fingers to pull her along. Amaia  yelps, running along and crashing into shoulders and backs as apologies fly from her mouth rapid-fire.
               “What are you doing?” She hisses at her younger sister. Emily huffs, stopping in her tracks to pull her aside, hands waving wildly as she speaks.
               “Did you not see who’s here?”
               “Yeah, and?” She glances over at the door, where their ‘adopted’ brother and his girlfriend are being smothered with hugs. The interaction is long, and busy-but Eliza seems to handle it well, eyes moving from person to person with an unfaltering smile upon her face. Amaia feels her own lips turn up, a subconscious mirror of the expression. Emily scowls.
               “Don’t you think we should go and say something to her?”
               “Are you trying to steal her from Alex or something? I mean I know she’s pretty, but,”
               “-no! I mean yeah she’s pretty, of course she’s pretty, but,” The younger sister’s face is immediately covered in a light scarlet blush, one that consumes her features before leaving with the shake of her head. “That’s not the point. The point is that she kind of stole Alex from John.”
               “But Alex isn’t gay”
               “-in a way. In a way, she replaced John. So there’s that. Also she’s dating our brother. She needs the third degree just like we gave Sarah when she started dating Luis. Or like we’ll give to any of Henry’s girlfriends if he can ever get a date.”
               “Emily!”
               “I’m just being honest. Anyway, we have more important things to deal with.” She grabs hold of Amaia’s hand, who hesitantly follows her to the front of the crowd. The older sister watches a switch flip in Emily, where her intimidating scowl is turned into a bright and chipper grin accompanied with raised posture.
               “Eliza! It’s really nice to meet you. I’m Emily and this is Amaia, we’re two of the three sisters. Come get a drink with us, I won’t take no for an answer.” Eliza allows a sister on either side, linking their arms with hers and pulling her through the crowd. She throws a delighted expression Alexander’s way, wondering why his face has fallen into a thin line of anxiety.
               They seem nice enough-Eliza is touched by the immediate sense of belonging, the connection that comes with having two sisters of her own. They pour her a drink that stings her throat on the way down but she gulps it anyway, enjoying the heat and the comradery of the other two peeking over their own cups. The kitchen has grown to a raucous level of volume; cousins lined up at the island taking shots, aunts standing over the stove with grandmothers. Eliza takes a breath-a moment to let it all sink in. This is nothing like brunch, or a gala, or the way her Christmas would be tomorrow. No, this is fun. This is family. Emily takes note of her expression, leaning against the wall with a teasing sort of smirk.
               “Not your average Christmas eve, right?”
               “No,” Eliza chuckles, coming out of her observation to reply. There is so much noise that she feels like she’s shouting, competing over the voices melding between Spanish and English around her. “It’s a lot better. Trust me.”
               “So, how long have you and Alex been together?”
               “Three months last week.”
“Really? So, not long at all then.” Amaia glares at Emily’s comment, looking between the half-smirk painted on her younger sister’s full lips and the scarlet that flushes the delicate color from Eliza’s cheeks.
“No, I guess not…it feels longer, though.”
“And what about John? Did you know about his situation before or after Alex chose you?”
“Emily!” Hands on her hips, the older Laurens shoots a tight-lipped scowl toward Emily who, just a year or so older than Eliza, stands significantly taller. Her volleyball-player stature and high ponytail are just accessories to winged eyeliner and a full-lipped smirk. Amaia, more composed in nature, smacks her younger sister’s arm.
Eliza stares between the two for a moment, taken back by the blunt nature of Emily’s comment. She takes it in stride, however. Having two sisters helps-Angelica had acted the same way toward Alex for the first few weeks of their relationship-although a bit more filtered, and less harsh-natured. There is a similarity there, in the way that Emily scowls in defense of her brother, which actually warms Eliza to the situation. And in her soft-spoken nature she simply smiles back at the middle Laurens sister, shaking her head.
“John didn’t tell me until a few weeks ago-I would have never known, and I felt terrible about it. But we had a long talk and I think that helped both of us. I wouldn’t intentionally hurt John, especially if he had been my friend before Alexander and I started dating.”
Both sisters seem appeased by her answer, although Amaia’s matured grin and touch of a hand to Eliza’s shoulder is much more comforting than the slow-to-warm shrug of her younger sister. Eliza accepts it, however, thankful that her words hadn’t tripped out from underneath her. Soon, both sisters are pulled away into the crowd, and Eliza is left standing in the kitchen, nursing the burning drink and watching the clamor around her.
Alexander has thrown himself into the chaos.
He and John find themselves in the middle of the living room, packed between a group of cousins who have turned on an upbeat rhythm laden with layers of acoustic guitars and bright-toned trumpets. John is a much better dancer than him-his hips move with the practice of both genetics and natural talent, and he spins a lithe preteen cousin around, her hip-length hair whipping along with her. Alex sways alone, practiced albeit a bit awkward-the continual sips of his drink have helped loosen him up, yet not enough to bring him to John’s gusto. But there’s music, and family, and so he bounces along to the beat in the throng of people.
Soon the living area is cramped with people-family, friends, and even a few of those who’d had nowhere else to go for the night. Valeria Laurens is in her glory amongst them, in the middle of a more complex set of moves as she’s spun around by her husband. They relish in the chaos of it all-the music, the laughter. Each year, their growing family adds a new layer of brightness to the holiday. Each year, hosting this party becomes more of a reward than anything else. And then, there’s the newest member of their family. Valeria watches as Eliza holds pudgy toddler hands in her own, bending down to shake a second cousin’s youngest daughter in her own version of a salsa. Then, there are two of them in a circle-three, four, until a gaggle of the younger children have gathered around her. She takes the commotion-twelve clamoring children reaching out for her hand, arguing over who gets to be closer-in stride. Then, they end up in a conga line down the split of cheering relatives, who look on, bemused, at how easily the newcomer has fit herself in.
               Eliza is so enthralled with the entertainment of the children that she doesn’t even notice Alexander until he’s pulled her waist, tearing her away from the children who now run freely among the crowd, spinning in colorful Christmas dresses and spiked-up hair.
               “Is it my turn?” One hand finds her back and the other Eliza’s hand, and before she can nod he’s started leading her, in a combination of movement that causes an eruption of laughter as she attempts to keep up with him.
               “I thought you said you were a dancer,” he teases as she trips over his foot again. Her movements are trying and a bit stiff, stumbling over her own feet as he leads her.
               “Ballet, jazz...not this.”
               “Well then, I guess I’ll have to teach you.” Alexander’s hold adjusts from her back to her hip, holding her visibly closer than the dance suggests. Through her laughter she follows him, loosening up as he mutters terrible jokes in her ear.
               “You’re pretty good at this.
               “Pretty good?” He brushes his lips against hers. “I’d like to think I’m better than pretty good.”
               Eliza can’t tell if it’s the drink she’s been given or the way he holds her, but the air of Alexander’s confidence makes her heart race, the composition of her body growing warmer in anticipation of another brush of his lips against her-along any part of her. He just barely composes himself, taking in the compliment of the change in her eyes, knowing full-well that his awkward, fumbling dancing is still somehow managing to turn her on.
Through the motion of pulling Eliza even closer Alexander feels a tugging on the leg of his pants, looking down to find a set of wide, shining eyes staring up at him. The two year-old girl, with hair in bobbed ringlet curls, raises her hands to him with a dimpled smile. He takes in a long breath of air as Eliza backs up, just enough to give the girl room to stand between them, covering the blush that’s crept along her cheeks with a warmhearted smile. Alex pulls the girl up, resting her on his side and letting her join in the dancing as well. He holds one of her tiny hands in his, the other wrapped tight around his neck, and spins her. He laughs at the way she giggles, boisterous and light, as she reaches for Eliza. His girlfriend dips her, a hand holding her back while she shouts in delight. The girl is torn, hands outstretched between the two, shouting playfully for more. It has Alex nearly doubled over in laughter, the way she jumps between their arms, until finally she settles with him, her hands holding Eliza’s.
She would be stupid not to notice how easy it all seemed-the way Alexander’s smile reached his eyes, which remain settled on the girl between them. And she fit so nicely there, giggling and chattering over the hum of the music. It only intensified things, this sight-especially since she hadn’t yet seen Alexander with children before.
There had been plenty of times that Eliza had been witness to James with children. Although his Thanksgiving had been nothing like this Christmas Eve, there had been plenty of kids. And she’d played with them, rallying them in a game on the carpet in a separate room while the adults conversed. He’d only come in once, to bring her around on his arm after shooing the children away. He spoke to them in the same tone as to the adults-nothing spectacular. He’d even gotten harsh with a distant cousin who’d wanted to chat. His cold tones and disinterested mannerisms had made her feel downcast, disheartened. At the time, before she realized just how he was treating her, she’d lingered on the moment with careful consideration. He clearly had no interest in children-the reality surged within her the fact that no children would be a deal-breaker.
At least Alexander seemed to take interest in them. To this girl he was tender, and sweet, letting her pudgy hands ‘braid’ his hair after she’d let go of Eliza. And he spoke to her with a tone that was lighter than his own, changed to match her persistent questioning without skipping a beat. And he even seemed to enjoy her company, too, even though it had taken away from their private moment. These thoughts became observations Eliza tucked into a piece of her mind, a recording she would play over and over if allowed. It’s transfixing, so much so that it takes her more than a few minutes to realize that John is by her side, lingering with a hand on her shoulder.
“You know, I’m learning a lot about you tonight, E.” Eliza doesn’t take her eyes from Alexander and the child, too enraptured by the interaction to care. All she can muster is a hum in response, one that barely reaches an audible level of voice. “But the best thing I’ve learned is how terrible you are at hiding things.”
“Oh,” She still hasn’t looked away, her cheeks lifting in response to the girl, who has now placed both hands on her boyfriend’s cheeks, squishing his lips into a fish face that sends them both into a fit of laughter.
“As in your clearly estrogen-filled response to this scene, or better yet that giant red welt on your collarbone.”
Her hand shoots to the spot, horror taking over the bliss that had once consumed her. John laughs, smirking as she leads him from the crowd of the makeshift dance floor.
“Is it really that noticeable? I tried to tell him not to, but it was too late, and then it just happened and I don’t want your family to think anything of me because of it, and,”
“Relax, E, it’s fine. It’s not even that bad. We’re all so drunk at this point I’m sure nobody has even noticed.”
She sits between Alexander and Amaia at dinner, in the middle of a long row of mismatched, pushed-together tables and folding chairs. There are almost too many people to fit- one end pushed up against the wall and the other too close to the stove. But it is cozy-and loud-and Eliza enjoys the comfort of being surrounded by so many people. The chatter is sincere-not just an exchange of pleasantries but of inside jokes and the trade of old family stories. There is so much going on that she can’t decide which piece to hold on to until Amaia begins weaving a tale from her cardiology residency that has her-and most of their part of the table-on the edge of their seats. Alex holds her hand between their chairs, a muted show of affection that warms her nearly as much as the second-or was it third-drink.
A shout breaks through the chatter and the room falls silent to an older man-that’s Abuelito-who stands at the head of the table with an expression that envelops the room in a sense of togetherness. It seems as though everybody is related to this man, who leads a dynamic prayer that hinges each member of the family to his words. Then he’s going around the table, stopping in front of each person with one hand on their shoulder and the other clasping his drink.
“And here’s Luis-never the bright one, let’s all share in a prayer that he and Sarah’s first child doesn’t get his brains. Or his…eh…beauty.” The crowd is alight in a raucous laughter, some clapping Luis on the back while other eyes dart in half-apologetic smiles to a round-bellied blonde. At first Eliza is horrified-why would he have prolonged his time entertaining the party just to insult his grandson? But soon, she realizes this is part of the tradition. John nudges her from across the table with the backside of his fork, grinning wildly as Abuelito stops in front of Amaia.
“Oh, Amaia. How you chose to work with hearts is beyond me-how can you know so much about them if yours is so cold?” The oldest Laurens daughter turns to Eliza, rolling her eyes good-naturedly before tossing her napkin behind her, hitting Abuelito in his square-rimmed glasses. He knocks her in the back of the head-gently, Eliza notes-before sliding over behind Alex, both arms on his shoulders.
“And there’s Alex, who god brought to us even though I said Valeria couldn’t possibly feed anyone else. But he did bring our family an ear-full and a wonderful girl. Alex, I would ask you to keep her around but we can all see that love bite so I’m not too worried.”
Eliza has never felt so much heat rush to her cheeks in such a rapid manner. There is no point now in covering up the painfully obvious, pointed-out mark on her body so she merely shrugs, tossing her silky hair over her shoulder. Amaia rubs a circle on her back, whispering a string of words that widen Eliza’s smile even more.
She sits back, then, watching the jovial interaction between the large group of people with a bubbling laughter that feels natural rolling from her stomach. There is something so different about these people-his family, with their raucous noise level, salsa dancing, and long mismatched tables. They speak in rapid voices, joke freely, and keep the drinks going throughout the night in a continuous party. And when she and Alex return to the dance floor, Amaia’s words linger in her mind, repeating themselves over and over as if she’s too grateful to believe them.
“Now that you’ve been blessed, welcome to the family.”
42 notes · View notes
patriotsnet · 3 years
Text
How Many Seats Do The Republicans Have In The Senate
New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/how-many-seats-do-the-republicans-have-in-the-senate/
How Many Seats Do The Republicans Have In The Senate
Tumblr media
Dems Keep House Gop Holds Key Senate Seats Nbc News Projects
WASHINGTON Democrats will maintain of the House of Representatives, NBC News projects, but their path to taking control of the Senate has narrowed significantly as numerous Republican incumbents fended off strong opposition.
Democrats failed to pick up some of the Senate seats they were banking on to capture a majority. Their hopes for a big night were dashed up and down the ballot, as President Donald Trump outperformed his polls against Joe Biden in a race still to be decided.
In Maine, Republican Sen. Susan Collins was by NBC News as the apparent winner.
Other GOP senators who were Democratic targets hung on: Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, Montana Sen. Steve Daines and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham were all re-elected, NBC News projected.
Adding some uncertainty, the Georgia special election is headed to a runoff on Jan. 5 between Democrat Raphael Warnock and Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler, NBC News projects.
Democrats will pick up a Senate seat in Colorado as John Hickenlooper is projected by NBC News to unseat Republican Sen. Cory Gardner, marking the partyâs first gain.
Offsetting that, Republicans will pick up a seat in Alabama, where Republican Tommy Tuberville is projected to defeat Democratic Sen. Doug Jones, NBC News projects.
In Arizona, the Democratic challenger Mark Kelly leads but NBC News rates it âtoo early to call.â
In North Carolina, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis leads Democrat Cal Cunningham narrowly but the race is rated âtoo close to call.â
Will 2022 Be A Good Year For Republicans
A FiveThirtyEight Chat
Welcome to FiveThirtyEights politics chat. The transcript below has been lightly edited.
sarah : Were still more than a year away from the 2022 midterm elections, which means it will be a while before we should take those general election polls too seriously. But with a number of elections underway in 2021, not to mention a number of special elections, its worth kicking off the conversation around what we do and dont know about Republicans and Democrats odds headed into the midterms.
Lets start big picture. The longstanding conventional wisdom is that midterm elections generally go well for the party thats not in the White House. Case in point: Since 1946, the presidents party has lost, on average, 27 House seats.
What are our initial thoughts? Is the starting assumption that Republicans should have a good year in 2022?
alex : Yes, and heres why: 2022 will be the first federal election after the House map are redrawn. And because Democrats fell short of their 2020 expectations in state legislative races, Republicans have the opportunity to redraw congressional maps that are much more clearly in their favor. On top of that, Republicans are already campaigning on the cost and magnitude of President Bidens policy plans to inspire a backlash from voters.
geoffrey.skelley :Simply put, as that chart above shows, the expectation is that Democrats, as the party in the White House, will lose seats in the House.
nrakich : What they said!
United States Senate Elections 2020
November 3, 2020 U.S. Senate Elections by State U.S. House Elections
Elections to the U.S. Senate were held on November 3, 2020. A total of 33 of the 100 seats were up for regular election.
Those elected to the U.S. Senate in the 33 regular elections on November 3, 2020, began their six-year terms on January 3, 2021.
Special elections were also held to fill vacancies that occurred in the 116th Congress, including 2020 special U.S. Senate elections in Arizona for the seat that John McCain won in 2016 and in Georgia for the seat that Johnny Isakson won in 2016.
Twelve seats held by Democrats and 23 seats held by Republicans were up for election in 2020. Heading into the election, Republicans had a majority with 53 seats. Democrats needed a net gain of four seats, or three in addition to winning the presidential election, to take control of the chamber. The vice president casts tie-breaking votes in the Senate.
On this page, you will find:
Information on historical wave elections
Republicans On Course To Hold Senate Majority
WASHINGTON D.C, November 4, 2020 The Republican party looks set to hold its majority in the U.S. Senate, as election night draws to a close across the nation.
The latest figures show the Republicans with 47 confirmed seats and the Democrats with 45. At the time of writing only six seats remain unconfirmed: Alaska, Georgia, Georgia Special, Maine, Michigan, and North Carolina. 
Republicans are on target to hold both North Carolina and Maine, and also have a healthy lead in Michigan which currently has 68% of the vote counted.
Georgia also looks secure for the Republicans, with Sen. Perdue on target to hold his seat. 
Of the six unconfirmed seats, only Georgia Special is without a clear winner and deemed a runoff.
Alaska currently has only 39% of the vote counted, with Rep. Dan Sullivan leading his Democrat challenger by 61.7% to 33.7%. Polls predict that Republicans will hold the seat.
The Democrats took a victory in Colorado, winning the seat from the Republicans, and also took the win in the Arizona Special election, after the death of Republican John McCain left the seat open.
However, the Democrats also lost their Alabama seat, as pro-life Republican Tommy Tuberville won the seat from Sen. Doug Jones.
Republicans have held a majority in the Senate since 2014, and prior to November 3 election night, held 53 seats.
Twitter just deplatformed President Trump premanently! And, other conservatives, including General Flynn and Sidney Powell, were also deplatformed.
Incoming Biden Administration And Democratic House Wont Have To Deal With A Republican
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Democrats Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff wave to supporters during a joint rally on Nov. 15 in Marietta, Ga.
1.285%
Democratic challengers Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock have defeated Georgias two incumbent Republican U.S. senators in the states runoff elections, the Associated Press said Wednesday, in a development that gives their party effective control of the Senate.
Ossoff and Warnock were projected the winners over Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler by the AP following campaigns that drew massive spending and worldwide attention because the runoffs were set to determine the balance of power in Washington. The AP , at about 2 a.m. Eastern, then followed with the call for Ossoff over Perdue on Wednesday afternoon.
President-elect Joe Bidens incoming administration and the Democratic-run House of Representatives now wont face the same checks on their policy priorities that they would have faced with a Republican-controlled Senate, though analysts have said the slim Democratic majority in the chamber could mean more power for moderate senators from either party.
It is looking like the Democratic campaign machine was more effective at driving turnout than the Republican one, said Eurasia Group analyst Jon Lieber in a note late Tuesday.
Warnock then made just before 8 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday.
Iowa: Joni Ernst Vs Bruce Braley
Republican Joni Ernst defeated Rep. Bruce Braley in the Iowa Senate race to fill the open seat vacated by the retirement of Sen. Tom Harkin, a Democratic stalwart in the state. Ernst, 44, will be the first female senator to ever represent Iowa, a state that catapulted Barack Obamas career just six years ago.
Ernst, an Iraq war veteran, shocked the political establishment when she won a crowded GOP primary in June. Ernst, a little known state senator, burst onto the national scene after releasing an attention grabbing ad called Squeal, which featured her talking about castrating hogs.
Braley stumbled throughout his campaign from making remarks that insulted some Iowa farmers to threatening a lawsuit against his neighbor over roaming chickens. Republican and Democratic surrogates with potential 2016 ambitions flooded Iowa in the final weeks of the campaign to help their candidates.
Cori Bush Becomes Missouri’s First Black Congresswoman Cbs News Projects
Cori Bush, a progressive Democrat and activist, has become Missouri’s first Black congresswoman, according to CBS News projections. With 88% of votes reported, Bush is leading Republican Anthony Rogers 78.9% to 19% to represent the state’s first congressional district, which includes St. Louis and Ferguson.
Bush, 44, claimed victory on Tuesday, promising to bring change to the district. “As the first Black woman and also the first nurse and single mother to have the honor to represent Missouri in the United States Congress, let me say this: To the Black women, the Black girls, the nurses, the essential workers, the single mothers, this is our moment,” she told supporters in St. Louis.
Read more here. 
The Winding Road To Democratic Control
Following an anxious four days of waiting after the 2020 general election, nearly all major news networks declared that Joe Biden had exceeded 270 electoral votes and won the presidency. Democrats also retained control of the U.S. House, although their majority has been trimmed back .
But the U.S. Senate still hung in the balance, a tantalizing prize for Democrats dreaming of a trifecta, and a bulwark against a Democratic agenda for Republicans who seek to hold onto some power under the new Biden administration that will be sworn in on Jan. 20, 2021.
Republicans claimed 50 Senate seats after the November election, two more than the 48 seats claimed by the Democratic Caucus at that time.
The Senates balance of power teetered on the fulcrum of Georgias two seats, both of which were decided by the January 5th runoff election. Georgia law requires candidates to be voted in with at least 50% of the votes cast; if a candidate does not reach that threshold the two candidates who received the highest number of votes face one another in a runoff election.
Georgias runoff election featured these match-ups:
Incumbent David Perdue versus Jon Ossoff .According to Georgias Secretary of State, Perdue received 88,000 more votes than Ossoff, but came up just shy of the 50% needed to avoid a runoff. This is in part due to the 115,000 votes that went to Libertarian candidate Shane Hazel who will not appear on the January ballot.
Maine Senate Race A Toss
 With polls closing at 8 p.m., the hotly contested Maine Senate race remains a toss-up. Senator Susan Collins, running for her fifth term, is considered one of the most moderate Republicans in the Senate, but she is facing considerable skepticism from Democrats and independents who previously supported her. State Speaker of the House Sara Gideon is the Democratic candidate, and has posted record fundraising.
CBS News projects that Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware and Democratic Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts have both won reelection. Republican Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma also won reelection.
The Alabama Senate race is leaning toward Republican Tommy Tuberville, who is taking on incumbent Senator Doug Jones, the most vulnerable Democrat in the Senate. 
The Tennessee Senate race is also leaning Republican. The Mississippi Senate race is likely Republican. The Senate races in New Hampshire, Illinois, and Rhode Island are lean Democratic, and New Jersey is likely Democratic.
Trump’s Former Physician Wins House Seat
Ronny Jackson, the former White House physician who served under both Presidents Trump and Obama, has won his race in Texas’ 13th Congressional District. Jackson rose to prominence in 2018 when he gave a glowing press conference about Mr. Trump’s health.
Mr. Trump nominated Jackson to be Veterans Affairs secretary last year, but Jackson withdrew amid allegations that he drank on the job and over-prescribed medications. In his House race, Jackson has closely aligned himself with Mr. Trump. He has downplayed the coronavirus pandemic and criticized mask-wearing requirements. He has also promoted baseless claims about Biden’s mental health.
Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw also won reelection. Crenshaw is a conservative firebrand and a rising GOP star in the House.
Why Is There An Election In Georgia
The election is being rerun because of Georgia’s rule that a candidate must take 50% of the vote in order to win.
None of the candidates in November’s general election met that threshold.
With 98% of votes counted, US TV networks and the Associated Press news agency called the first of the two races for Mr Warnock.
Control of the Senate in the first two years of Mr Biden’s term will be determined by the outcome of the second run-off.
Mr Warnock is set to become the first black senator for the state of Georgia – a slavery state in the US Civil War – and only the 11th black senator in US history.
He serves as the reverend of the Atlanta church where assassinated civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr grew up and preached.
Claiming victory, he paid tribute to his mother, Verlene, who as a teenager worked as a farm labourer.
“The other day – because this is America – the 82-year-old hands that used to pick somebody else’s cotton went to the polls and picked her youngest son to be a United States senator,” he said.
If both Democrats win, the Senate will be evenly split 50-50, allowing incoming Democratic Vice-President Kamala Harris the tie-breaking vote. The Democrats narrowly control the House of Representatives.
Mr Ossoff has also claimed victory in his race against Republican Senator David Perdue, but that race is even tighter. At 33, he would be the Senate’s youngest member for 40 years.
Mr Biden won at least seven million more votes than the president.
Us Election 2020: Democrats’ Hopes Of Gaining Control Of Senate Fade
Democrats are rapidly losing hope of gaining control of the US Senate after underperforming in key states.
Controlling the Senate would have allowed them to either obstruct or push through the next president’s agenda.
The party had high hopes of gaining the four necessary seats in Congress’s upper chamber, but many Republican incumbents held their seats.
The Democrats are projected to retain their majority in the lower chamber, the House, but with some key losses.
With many votes still to be counted, the final outcome for both houses may not be known for some time.
Why don’t we have a winner yet?
Among the disappointments for the Democrats was the fight for the seat in Maine, where Republican incumbent Susan Collins staved off a fierce challenge from Democrat Sara Gideon.
However, the night did see a number of firsts – including the first black openly LGBTQ people ever elected to Congress and the first openly transgender state senator.
The balance of power in the Senate may also change next January. At least one run-off election is due to be held that month in Georgia, since neither candidate has been able to secure more than 50% of votes.
This year’s congressional election is running alongside the battle for the White House between Donald Trump and his Democratic challenger Joe Biden.
Of the 35 Senate seats up for grabs, 23 were Republican-held and 12 were Democrat.
Senators serve six-year terms, and every two years a third of the seats are up for re-election.
Cal Cunningham Concedes North Carolina Senate Race
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Democrat Cal Cunningham conceded in the North Carolina Senate race on Tuesday, saying in a statement that he had called Republican incumbent Senator Thom Tillis to congratulate him on his victory.
“I just called Senator Tillis to congratulate him on winning re-election to a second term in the U.S. Senate and wished him and his family the best in their continued service in the months and years ahead,” Cunningham said. “The voters have spoken and I respect their decision.”
CBS News projects that Tillis has won the race, after Cunningham’s concession. Tillis led Cunningham by nearly 100,000 votes as of Tuesday. The presidential race in North Carolina is still too close to call, although President Trump is currently in the lead. The full results of the election in North Carolina are unlikely to be known until later this week, as the deadline in the state to receive absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day is November 12.
What Are The Magic Numbers
It depends on who wins the presidency. If its former Vice President Joe Biden, Democrats must flip three seats because new VP Kamala Harris would get to cast any tie-breaking vote. If its President Donald Trump, Democrats would need to flip four seats to seize control of the Senate. They already control the U.S. House of Representatives. Currently, Republicans have a 53 to 47 majority in the Senate.
With numerous races still uncalled in the Senate election, so far the Democrats have flipped seats in Arizona and Colorado, but Republicans flipped an Alabama seat.
Republicans also beat back Democratic challenges to retain seats in South Carolina, Montana, Kansas, Iowa, Maine and Texas. Democrats had launched aggressive challenges in attempts to pick up Senate seats in traditionally Republican areas, but that didnt happen for them.
Either side needs 51 seats to have a majority of seats in the Senate. According to Decision Desk HQ, Republicans had reached 48 seats and Democrats were at 47, as of 7:30 p.m. Eastern time on November 4.
However, Republicans were leading in several Senate races that had yet to be called.
In North Carolina, Republican Thom Tillis declared victory, but, according to WSOC-TV, not all votes had yet been counted and the race was too close to call on November 4.
In one of the two Georgia Senate races, Republican David Perdue was also leading with most returns in.
Where It Stands: Election Hinges On Key States Final Results May Take A While
McConnell is expected to remain leader of the GOP conference if Republicans hold the chamber. During Trump’s first term, McConnell led the effort to remake the federal judiciary with 220 judges confirmed, including three Supreme Court justices.
Democrats hoped that progressives’ concerns about Barrett replacing liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court would help fuel their bid to oust Republicans, who confirmed her just days before Election Day.
Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the only Republican to vote against Barrett, was one of the most vulnerable members. But Collins was ahead early Wednesday in her bid against Democratic candidate Sarah Gideon, according to The Associated Press.
GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, also a top-tier target for Democrats, was leading in the AP vote count, but the race as of early Wednesday was still too close to call, as was North Carolina’s choice for president.
In the final weeks of the campaign, Democrats hoped to win one or both Senate seats in Georgia. The contest between GOP Sen. David Perdue and Democrat Jon Ossoff has not yet been called by the AP. And the special election for the other seat will go to a runoff because no candidate received 50% of the vote Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler will face Democrat Raphael Warnock, a pastor from Atlanta, on Jan. 5.
McConnell said the outcome of the presidential race is still unsettled and it may be another day or more before key Senate races are decided.
Could Flip Under The Right Conditions: Michigan Iowa Montana Kansas And Georgia Special Election
Michigan: Michigan is one of the most hotly contested states in the presidential race, and the reelection bid of Sen. Gary Peters will get caught up in that. Democrats say the fact that the coronavirus has hit Michigan hard makes it more likely Biden can win this state, which was crucial to Trumps 2016 victory. In the Senate race, Republicans have made a big deal out of John James, an Iraq War veteran and conservative media darling. James has outraised Peters for three straight quarters and is close to having as much money as Peters in the bank. Democrats argue Republicans are too bullish on a candidate who also lost a Senate race against a Democrat in 2018. Polls have shown this race close between the two.
Montana: Can a popular Democratic governor who won in Trump country unseat a sitting Republican senator? Term-limited Gov. Steve Bullock , a former 2020 presidential candidate, is running against Sen. Steve Daines . Bullock is the Democrat with the best shot, given hes won three times statewide, including when Trump swept the state in 2016. And in 2018, Sen. Jon Tester won a tough reelection fight. But can Bullock unseat a sitting Republican senator in a state that some strategists estimate could vote for Trump by as many as 20 points?
Democrats Probably Need To Win All Four Toss
There remain some big wild cards in the race for the Senate majority: Neither side has a handle yet on how the coronavirus pandemic, or the race between President Trump and former vice president Joe Biden, will shape individual Senate races.
Democrats, once seen as a long shot to take the majority from Republicans in November, have had a lot go their way in recent months. Theyve persuaded some choice candidates to jump in and make races more competitive, and their fundraising has been strong.
But to pick up at least four Senate seats, Democrats probably have to win all four toss-up races. That, plus a win by Biden, would give them an effective Senate majority, since his vice president could cast tie-breaking votes.
With a lot more unknowns than normal at this point in the election cycle, here are the 10 races most likely to flip. Because so many races are so close, rather than rank them, I grouped them into three tiers: Likely to flip; Toss-ups; Could flip under the right conditions.
Opinion:the House Looks Like A Gop Lock In 2022 But The Senate Will Be Much Harder
Redistricting will take place in almost every congressional district in the next 18 months. The party of first-term presidents usually loses seats in midterms following their inauguration President Barack Obamas Democrats lost 63 seats in 2010 and President Donald Trumps Republicans lost 40 in 2018 but the redistricting process throws a wrench into the gears of prediction models.
President George W. Bush saw his party add nine seats in the House in 2002. Many think this was a consequence of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America nearly 14 months earlier, but the GOP, through Republican-led state legislatures, controlled most of the redistricting in the two years before the vote, and thus gerrymandering provided a political benefit. Republicans will also have a firm grip on redistricting ahead of the 2022 midterms.
The Brennan Center has that the GOP will enjoy complete control of drawing new boundaries for 181 congressional districts, compared with a maximum of 74 for Democrats, though the final numbers could fluctuate once the pandemic-delayed census is completed. Gerrymandering for political advantage has its critics, but both parties engage in it whenever they get the opportunity. In 2022, Republicans just have much better prospects. Democrats will draw districts in Illinois and Massachusetts to protect Democrats, while in Republican-controlled states such as Florida, Ohio and Texas, the GOP will bring the redistricting hammer down on Democrats.
Lindsey Graham Wins Reelection In South Carolina Senate Race Cbs News Projects
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham won reelection, CBS News projects, after a contentious race. Although Democratic candidate Jaime Harrison outraised Graham by a significant amount, it was not enough to flip a Senate seat in the deep-red state.
Graham led the high-profile confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, and Harrison hit him for his reversal on confirming a Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year.
Meanwhile, Republican Roger Marshall has also won the Senate race in Kansas, defeating Democrat Barbara Bollier.
Potentially Competitive Us Senate Races In 2022
Held by Republicans
Maggie Hassan Biden +7.4
The Democrats could also have opportunities in Ohio, where Sen. Rob Portman is retiring, and in Florida, home of Sen. Marco Rubio , but both of these once-preeminent swing states have drifted toward the GOP in recent elections and could be tough to pick off in 2022.
The GOPs top two pickup opportunities are also readily apparent: Arizona and Georgia. Both were among the most narrowly decided states that Biden won, and both have a history of favoring Republicans. Both are home to Democratic incumbents who won their seats in 2020 special elections: Sens. Mark Kelly and Raphael G. Warnock . The GOPs path back to a majority begins with reclaiming these two states.
Beyond that, though, obvious GOP opportunities are harder to come by. New Hampshire could be competitive if popular Gov. Chris Sununu challenges Sen. Maggie Hassan , but it has trended in the Democrats favor in recent years, going for Biden by seven points last year. Ditto Nevada, where first-term Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto is up for reelection, but the GOP bench is somewhat limited as the state has also drifted blue in recent years.
Democrats control of the House is arguably more imperiled than their hold on the Senate. Thats a function of the Senate seats that are up for reelection as well as the lay of the land in the House.
About this story
0 notes