Tumgik
#abortion
odinsblog ¡ 3 days
Text
🗣️This is an illegitimate and deeply corrupt Supreme Court. Vote every Republican & conservative politician out of office in 2024
Tumblr media Tumblr media
WASHINGTON (AP) — One woman miscarried in the lobby restroom of a Texas emergency room as front desk staff refused to check her in. Another woman learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldn't offer an ultrasound. The baby later died.
Complaints that pregnant women were turned away from U.S. emergency rooms spiked in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, federal documents obtained by The Associated Press reveal.
The cases raise alarms about the state of emergency pregnancy care in the U.S., especially in states that enacted strict abortion laws and sparked confusion around the treatment doctors can provide.
“It is shocking, it’s absolutely shocking,” said Amelia Huntsberger, an OB/GYN in Oregon. “It is appalling that someone would show up to an emergency room and not receive care — this is inconceivable.”
It's happened despite federal mandates that the women be treated.
Federal law requires emergency rooms to treat or stabilize patients who are in active labor and provide a medical transfer to another hospital if they don’t have the staff or resources to treat them. Medical facilities must comply with the law if they accept Medicare funding.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday that could weaken those protections. The Biden administration has sued Idaho over its abortion ban, even in medical emergencies, arguing it conflicts with the federal law.
“No woman should be denied the care she needs,” Jennifer Klein, director of the White House Gender Policy Council, said in a statement. “All patients, including women who are experiencing pregnancy-related emergencies, should have access to emergency medical care required under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).”
PREGNANCY CARE AFTER ROE
Pregnant patients have “become radioactive to emergency departments” in states with extreme abortion restrictions, said Sara Rosenbaum, a George Washington University health law and policy professor
“They are so scared of a pregnant patient, that the emergency medicine staff won’t even look. They just want these people gone," Rosenbaum said.
Consider what happened to a woman who was nine months pregnant and having contractions when she arrived at the Falls Community Hospital in Marlin, Texas, in July 2022, a week after the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion. The doctor on duty refused to see her.
(continue reading)
102 notes ¡ View notes
Text
Jessica Valenti at Abortion, Every Day:
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita says that abortion reports aren’t medical records, and that they should be available to the public in the same way that death certificates are. While Rokita pushes for public reports, New Hampshire lawmakers are fighting over a Republican bill to collect and publish abortion data, and U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville has introduced a bill that would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to collect and provide data on the abortions performed at its facilities. Just last week, Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed legislation that would have required abortion providers to ask patients invasive and detailed questions about why they were getting abortions, and provide those answers in a report to the state.   All of these moves are part of a broader strategy that weaponizes abortion data to stigmatize patients and to prosecute providers. And while most states have some kind of abortion reporting law, legislators are increasingly trying to expand the scope of the data, and use it to dismantle women’s privacy.
Rokita’s ‘advisory opinion’, for example, argues that abortion data collected by the state isn’t private medical information and that in order to prosecute abortion providers, he needs detailed reports to be public. In the past, the state has issued reports on each individual abortion. But as a result of Indiana’s ban, there are only a handful of abortions being performed in the state. As such, the Department of Health decided to release aggregate reports to protect patient confidentiality, noting that individual reports could be “reverse engineered to identify patients—especially in smaller communities.” Rokita—best known for his harassment campaign against Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the abortion provider who treated a 10-year-old rape victim—is furious over the change. He says the only way he can arrest and prosecute people is if he gets tips from third parties, presumably anti-abortion groups that scour the abortion reports for alleged wrongdoing. He wants the state to either restore public individual reports, or to allow his office to go after abortion providers without a complaint by a third party. (Meaning, he could pursue investigations against doctors and hospitals without cause.)
Most troubling, though, is his insistence that women’s private abortion information isn’t private at all. Even though individual reports could be used to identify patients, Rokita claims that the terminated pregnancy reports [TPRs] aren’t medical records, and that they “do not belong to the patient.” [...] As I flagged last month, abortion reporting is becoming more and more important to anti-choice lawmakers and groups. Project 2025 includes an entire section on abortion reporting, for example, and major anti-abortion organizations like the Charlotte Lozier Institute and Americans United for Life want to mandate more detailed reports.
[...]  As is the case with funding for crisis pregnancy centers and legislation about ‘prenatal counseling’ or ‘perinatal hospice care’, Republicans are advancing abortion reporting mandates under the guise of protecting women. And in a moment when voters are furious over abortion bans, anti-choice lawmakers and organizations very much need Americans to believe that lie. We have to make clear that state GOPs aren’t just banning abortion, but enacting any and every punitive policy that they can—especially those that strip us of our medical privacy. After all, it was less than a year ago that 19 Republican Attorneys General wanted the ability to investigate the out-of-state medical records of abortion patients. Did we really think they were going to stop there?
@jessicavalenti writes a solid column in her Abortion, Every Day blog that the GOP's agenda to erode patient privacy of those seeking abortions is a dangerous one.
62 notes ¡ View notes
140 notes ¡ View notes
theconcealedweapon ¡ 3 days
Text
I just witnessed someone say that a major reason men with power fight so hard against abortion is because they need more future workers.
I never thought of it that way, but it makes sense.
A baby who's born to someone who can't afford to raise them is going to grow up poor. They most likely won't have the opportunity to pursue the life of their dreams. They most likely won't have the free time to fight back. They'll most likely have to work low wage jobs desperately trying to afford to live. And that's what corporations want.
54 notes ¡ View notes
redditreceipts ¡ 10 hours
Text
Tumblr media
48 notes ¡ View notes
theriu ¡ 15 hours
Text
“What if one of those aborted children had been the next president” is a valid argument, but also. What if one of them had a best friend. What if one really loved cartoons. What if they doodled cool chalk drawings on the sidewalk. Enjoyed a hot cup of tea on cool rainy days. Liked rock-climbing on weekends. Played hours of Guild Wars 2 with their guild. Took a nap in a field. Got in a heated argument about the the thematic importance of Star Trek Data having a cat. Were really good at origami. Had a personally rewarding job driving a semi. Collected shells on the beach. Got their hair done specially for a night out. Had a favorite pair of socks. Let their pet ride around the house on their shoulder. Kissed their mom on the cheek. Cried in the arms of their brother after a bad breakup. Changed a flat tire by themselves for the first time. Held the door open for a stranger who then held the next door open for them. Prayed for a friend who was sick. Swung their daughter in circles by the arms until she squealed with laughter. Had a favorite flower. Laughed until they cried. Loved drive-thru Christmas light displays.
Do you see where I’m going? How a life and all its ephemeral, mundane moments are of infinite worth regardless of their measurable impact on the wider world?
42 notes ¡ View notes
grrlscientist ¡ 2 days
Text
Until abortion access is fully legal, Digital Surveillance poses a significant threat. We’ve gotten better at answering questions about how to keep each other safe. Here’s what we’ve learned
33 notes ¡ View notes
rapeculturerealities ¡ 7 hours
Text
Biden moves to shield patients’ abortion records from GOP threats - The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/04/22/abortion-medical-records-patients-biden-hipaa/
The Biden administration on Monday announced new rules intended to protect the privacy of patients seeking abortions, and the health workers who may have provided them, from Republican prosecutors who have threatened to crack down on the procedure.
The rules strengthen a nearly 30-year-old health privacy law — known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA — to offer more robust legal protections to those who obtain or provide reproductive health care in a state where it is legal to do so. The final policy prohibits physicians, insurers and other health-care organizations from disclosing health information to state officials for the purposes of conducting an investigation, filing a lawsuit or prosecuting a patient or provider. It covers women who cross state lines to legally terminate a pregnancy and those who qualify for an exception to their state’s abortion ban, such as in cases of rape, incest or a medical emergency.
Under previous rules, organizations were allowed to disclose private medical information to law enforcement in certain cases, such as a criminal investigation. Officials at the Department of Health and Human Services said they had heard from patients and providers who were confused about their legal risks or had even deferred care amid GOP threats in the nearly two dozen states with abortion restrictions.
28 notes ¡ View notes
animentality ¡ 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
37K notes ¡ View notes
destielmemenews ¡ 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
source 1
source 2
83K notes ¡ View notes
yeahiwasintheshit ¡ 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
33K notes ¡ View notes
embracetheshipping ¡ 11 days
Text
20K notes ¡ View notes
evilkitsch ¡ 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
"Interstate 55 carries 10s of thousands of abortion seekers out of southern states to Illinois, where abortion is legal. I-55 is covered with horrific, shaming billboards. Shout Your Abortion put up 6 good ones, to show love & affirmation to those making the journey." x
46K notes ¡ View notes
writing-with-olive ¡ 1 year
Text
when you call your reps to ask them to pretty please stop taking away your rights, remember:
In deep red areas you're a republican who is thinking of voting for someone else if they don't vote what you want on this specific bill because it impacts your republican ideals so very much
In swing states you're an undecided voter who's gonna go blue if they don't vote how you like
remember to call because that way their phone is going off and their peers can hear it because their offices are close together (emails and letters don't work like that), so it can rattle them if they get high volumes. remember that you gotta make them feel like they're losing something.
68K notes ¡ View notes
marta-bee ¡ 10 months
Text
This was an interesting read. Surprisingly nonpreachy given the subject; and well worth the time.
44K notes ¡ View notes
on-a-lucky-tide ¡ 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
PSA: never discuss private affairs in your DMs, especially contraception and abortion. Social media moguls will absolutely sell you out to the government. There are already cases of people being charged based on evidence in their DMs.
39K notes ¡ View notes