i. about 2 weeks ago, i was told there's a good chance that in 5 or so years, i'll need a wheelchair.
ii. okay. i loved harry potter as a kid. i have a hypothesis about this to be honest - why people still kind of like it. it's that she got very lucky. she managed to make a cross-generational hit. it was something shared for both parents and kids. it was right at the start of a huge cultural shift from pre to post-internet. i genuinely think many people were just seeking community; not her writing. it was a nice shorthand to create connection. which is a long way of saying - she didn't build this legacy, we built it for her. she got lucky, just once. that's all.
iii. to be real with you, i still struggle with identifying as someone with a disability, which is wild, especially given the ways my life has changed. i always come up against internalized ableism and shame - convinced even right now that i'm faking it for attention. i passed out in a grocery store recently. i hit my head on the shelves while i went down.
iv. he raises his eyebrows while he sends me a look. her most recent new book has POTS featured in it. okay, i say. i already don't like where this is going. we both take another bite of ramen. it is a trait of the villain, he says. we both roll our eyes about it.
v. so one of the things about being nonbinary but previously super into harry potter is that i super hate jk rowling. but it is also not good for my mental health to regret any form of joy i engaged with as a kid. i can't punish my young self for being so into the books - it was a passion, and it was how i made most of my friends. everyone knew about it. i felt like everyone had my same joy, my same fixation. as a "weird kid", this sense of belonging resonated with me so loudly that i would have done anything to protect it.
vi. as a present, my parents once took me out of school to go see the second movie. it is an incredibly precious memory: my mom straight-up lying about a dentist appointment. us snickering and sneaking into the weekday matinee. within seven years of this experience, the internet would be a necessity to get my homework finished. the world had permanently changed. harry potter was a relic, a way any of us could hold onto something of the analog.
vii. by sheer luck, the year that i started figuring out the whole gender fluid thing was also the first year people started to point out that she might have some internalized biases. i remember tumblr before that; how often her name was treated as godhood. how harry potter was kind of a word synonymous for "nerdy but cool." i would walk out of that year tasting he/him and they/them; she would walk out snarling and snapping about it.
viii. when i teach older kids creative writing, i usually tell them - so, she did change the face of young adult fiction, there's no denying that. she had a lot more opportunities than many of us will - there were more publishing houses, less push for "virally" popular content creators. but beyond reading another book, we need to write more books. we need to uplift the voices of those who remain unrepresented. we need to push for an exposure to the bigotry baked into the publishing system. and i promise you: you can write better than she ever did. nothing she did was what was magical - it was the way that the community responded to it.
ix. i get home from ramen. three other people have screenshotted the POTS thing and sent it to me. can you fucking believe we're still hearing this shit from her when it's almost twenty-fucking-twenty-three. the villain is notably also popular on tumblr. i just think that's funny. this woman is a billionaire and she's mad that she can't control the opinions of some people on a dying blue site that makes no money. lady, and i mean this - get a fucking life.
x. i am sorry to the kid i was. maybe the kid you were too. none of us deserved to see something like this ruined. that thing used to be precious to me. and now - all those good times; measured into dust.
/// 9.6.2022 // FUCKING AGAIN, JK? Are you fucking kidding me?
6K notes
·
View notes
fall out boy on absolute radio listening party 3.26.23
[link]
the host asks about the parentheses around for in the album title - pete says it's "a double or triple entendre, everyone's trying to be someone and have their moment but that doesn't fill you up" but "there's something to be said about so much stardust." talks about how we're all just carbon, stardust and still can't get it together. he also just love parentheses!
talking about the album as an art form - patrick says they absolutely consider that and sequencing is important. there are a "few songs" which only made the record because of how well they told the story of the album. also love from the other side was conceptualized as an album opener because patrick felt none of the other songs felt like an opener!
the intro to lftos is patrick playing the same piano part at four different speeds, starting in sync and then falling out of sync as it continues - he says it feels representative of the whole album for him
with hold me like a grudge, pete says when patrick first played it for him the verses sounded like 2000s alternative radio hits but the chorus sounded "distinctly patrick" which was an "interesting blend." patrick: hm. thank you. i think. pete: yeah that was a compliment!
hold me like a grudge was the last song they wrote for the record! pete was second guessing other lyrics and sent patrick new lyrics to possibly replace the ones he was feeling unsure about. patrick read them before driving to the studio and by the time he got there the song was basically written in full.
pete makes a comment about how that's at least two songs "that people really like" that patrick's written in the car (referencing lotro); patrick says he's written a lot of songs in the car and pete jokes they should just toss him the keys
pete says it's the worst when you think of something in the car and are sure you'll remember it but you don't. says now when he thinks of something in the car when he's with bronx he'll tell him to write down words to trigger the whole phrase "but they don't make any sense together. i'll be like write this down and he'll be like '...okay." andy: like dad shut up [giggles]
fake out didn't come together until joe heard it! patrick had most of the lead guitar down but none of the rhythm guitar but "joe came in, gave it one listen, and picked up this acoustic. none of us had really thought about acoustic, he just went into the booth and we pressed record and he did it in one take... that became kinda the whole song."
patrick talks about soul punk briefly, says the most surprising thing about making it was that it was very unsurprising, because all the ideas were already in his head. part of why he enjoys working with the band so much is that they have ideas he never would've thought of.
they discuss changing sound - pete says the first time he had that feeling of like "oh i don't know if this is too different" he was scared of it but he's learned that it's a good thing and that there's always going to be so much of the band's dna on it that it Will sound like a fall out boy song
andy: i think a band can not just be a city it can be a continent. writing these different things is building the map to what the bigger picture is
they bring up queen and bowie as examples of artists that kept changing but now when you hear their songs you just think "oh that's queen" or "oh that's bowie." the host mentions he used to hide liking queen from his friends and patrick says he had to hide liking ska from the band. andy says he's had a really big reggae and ska phase recently and loves being able to talk to patrick about it because "he's a fountain of knowledge."
heaven, iowa is one of andy's favorite on the record and he loved it from the start! patrick reiterates a comment from another interview about how he didn't like it that much at first but knew everyone else did, kept asking joe for any and all ideas because he didn't like how much "space" there was and how naked his vocals felt. andy says he thinks space in music can be magical.
they talk about track sequencing again - patrick says he and pete moved "the meat of the album" around many, many times.
pete talks about the pink seashell interlude and being obsessed with mortality. patrick talks about the process of scoring it and how joe added guitar to the string lines which he thinks brought it all together.
they didn't start out thinking they necessarily had a record - patrick says "we went in with neal for a week to see if we had something and by the end of the week we had half the record.”
patrick's been asking people to tell him fan reactions to the record since he doesn't have social media 🥺 "i know i've been driving everyone nuts... i've been asking everyone 'do people like it? what do people think?'" reiterates the dinner for your family line to explain why this record means so much to him.
pete says making an album is kind of like being a climber standing at the bottom of a rock face trying to find a route up; when you get up the route might seem like it was obvious the whole time but it wasn't. patrick chimes in to agree and add that it feels like the song that was the centerpoint of the album shifted many times.
the host mentions that he really likes and relates to the title of "i am my own muse." pete talks about looking at his four year old and thinking about how "at that age, you Are your own muse. you're like 'i just color, i do what i want, i'm not trying to conform to your idea of my creativity' and welcoming some of that back into your life as an adult or an artist is great.'"
the host mentions that his nine year old son's favorite song ever is "centuries" and the band are appropriately flattered (though patrick does say sorry when the host says he's probably heard it more than any other song ever ajfioenaj).
going back to the discussion of different songs being the centerpoint of the album, patrick says flu game was "one of the first songs to have that spot."
patrick talks about not being the most confident guy but that he's learned to share all of his demos; he thinks he might not have played flu game in the past. pete chimes in to say in the past patrick has tried to throw out some of his best ideas.
patrick says flu game "kind of started the record" because it was the favorite out of the first five songs they made with neal. "this was the one that convinced neal i think." pete notes "this would've been an insane record if [flu game] was the lynchpin."
flu game was originally the lead single! pete: you know how we always talk about how if we were gonna fly in a helicopter that i would have to knock you out like b.a. baracus? patrick, instantly: yes. pete: if we had made this the first single you guys would've had to b.a. baracus me. patrick, protesting: that wasn't my choice!
pete says baby annihilation felt like an authentic way to pay homage to his past spoken word bits and he trusted neal to be able to make it work.
they have a discussion about the distinctions between emo/pop punk/straightedge hardcore and pete talks about how arbitrary the labels that are assigned to musicians often are. pete talks about how fall out boy started as kind of a break from the more hardcore stuff for him that he was doing for fun which allowed it to be more freeing. patrick agrees, talks about how andy and pete were in "real bands" so no one was taking fall out boy completely seriously which allowed them to be looser.
kintsugi kid was one of the songs patrick was mentioning earlier that was almost cut from the record but made it because of the track sequencing. patrick says he always felt very strongly about it and believed in it so was very glad when it made its way back on to the record. pete calls it the little song that could.
the host asks about their songwriting process and pete talks about how the best songs are the ones where he and patrick "clash" just the right amount; songs where one of them dominates over the other don't connect as well.
they discuss the different producers they've worked with; pete says every producer they've worked with has felt like the right person for the job. patrick talks about how working with so many different producers is part of why he wanted to go back to neal.
patrick talks about how important it was for this album to be a single producer album; with mania they had so many different producers and he wanted to get back to just being in a routine with the same person. andy: it's the difference between microwaving and actually cooking. patrick: yeah, i agree with that! andy, jokingly: thanks, i'm gonna leave.
patrick calls what a time to be alive his baby. says every time he played it for someone they would say "really?" pete: patrick was really determined to get this song on the record. i felt like gamora like "is it done? what did it cost you?" pete and patrick in unison: everything [laughter]
patrick says he and pete struck a bargain (pete: i don't remember this). patrick didn't want so good right now to be on the record (he wasn't going to name the song but pete told him to go for it) but pete was really advocating for it. patrick said that if pete let him have what a time to be alive he would green light so good right now.
pete talks about how art only really becomes art when it connects with its audience which is part of why they wanted to do those small shows and host listening parties, to see how people reacted
the host asks how their relationship with fame has changed; pete says they had a year or two where they were super famous "and it was not a great life;" talks about how he looks at kpop groups and boy bands and thinks "god bless that it wasn't that long for us." he says he made a point to rearrange his life to be less famous and prioritize his family and the band. also pete makes a star wars reference and patrick does a yoda impression 😭
the hour wraps up with pete asking the host if he still wants a video for his son and they do a quick video for him 🥺
80 notes
·
View notes
i actually agree with the other asker about the english speaker rule
it's not like this is any sort of official casting process so what if an actor doesn't speak english? it literally doesn't matter so what is this rule trying to achieve other than putting english on some pedestal just because it's the language the internet uses?
in the end it's your blog and nobody can force you to change anything but i find it strange to exclude actors who don't speak english, especially in a fandom for media that is first and foremost not english
The reason why I put up that rule was actually because the media in question (the live action netflix show) IS English. To make it a little more realistic they could in theory be cast. That's all. Not at all because it's the language the internet uses, just because it's the language the live action uses. I mean, if the live action was made in Japanese, it would probably have been Japanese that the actors should be able to speak.
But then again, I said from the beginning that I'm probably not gonna do some deep research after if all actors can speak English, so... 🤷♀️ I like to believe most people (especially in the acting world) would be able to speak some English. (But this might be my biased view, since I'm Dutch and most people in the Netherlands speak at least some English and quite a few Dutch actors have made it to big, English spoken shows and movies).
What I want to say is... this is not an extremely 'set in stone' kinda rule. Someone just added (paraphrased by me) "according to imdb, they did something at the Brittish embassey, so they probably speak English" to the propaganda, and you know what? That's good enough for me.
Also, I think about half of the actors submitted (or near half at least), have a non-native-english speaking background. (Just wanted to let you know)
12 notes
·
View notes
I wanted to share some points from my music theory assignment analysis of I Feel Him Slipping Away because it scored well and I'm proud :3. I bolded the the parts that analyse the meaning if people want to skip the more theory heavy (unbolded) parts.
Written in cut common, simple duple time which changes to 4/4 in the last few bars. Shifts frequently between A major and C#minor.
There are two rhythmic features that I want to talk about here. Here, in the bass clef, a dotted crotchet and crotchet rhythm is copied in the percussion to give a contrasting, uneven 3/4 feel. This is a shift from the relatively straight-foward rhythm of the previous verse. The triplet in the fourth bar here is also interesting as you’d expect it the previous line. In breaking that rhythm, it emphasises the phrase die in my arms which makes it feel more jarring, expressing Trina's anguish
This segment is taken from the first and second chorus. The second chorus vocals, cut off the #g early and echoes what was already being played in the piano line, repeating the word no in triplets. This has a compound duple feel and echoes how a person, out of frustration, may cut themselves off. This is something I've noticed Trina actually does often (both in In Trousers and Falsettos) that other characters don't really do (marvin does it in i've got a family but this is more about denial). She has a much greater tendency to either cut herself off or correct herself, reflecting her insecurities and self doubt.
At this point accidentals are also used to create an ascending c#major scale from c#minor, this creates further contrast and effectively shifts tone from the previous line of remorse to one of anger and vindication. It's further enforced by the fact that all three women are singing now in unison.
The opening has an A major chord in the piano piano which is reflected in the vocal melody: CCCAE. We start off very stable on the tonic. The rest of the chord progression goes Ab augmented, which resolves to Ab major, then F#minor (first inversion, so A is still the bass) back to A major (the return to a major occurs on the words "were fine". A quick return to the tonic to show how "fine" things are) back to Ab augmented again. This constant shift between stable and unstable chords, represents the contrast between the parts of the marriage that were "fine" and the parts that were "not" (echoing the lyrics). In the last two bars the melody of the vocals is mirrored on the piano until the last note where there is a dissonant minor second between a natural on the piano and g# on the vocals. This represents the clash between husband and wife and the "dissonance" of their marriage.
Only one part of this song really feels like a finished cadence. The end of the first two choruses goes from a suspended chord on the fifth note (g#) into the tonic c# minor. It feels like an ending, but she starts singing abruptly partway through the next bar, continuing on the same thought, but also contradicting it going from favourable descriptions to more negative thinking. This is another example of Trina's specific mannerisms that I mentioned earlier and to me is very similar to "I only want to love a man who can love me or like me or hold me or touch me or stand me" ("... or help me" in falsettos)
The last chord is an F# suspended 4th chord rather than the tonic, giving an abrupt, unsatisfying end as the conflict of the character is not resolved, this is further enforced as the song ends not on the chord, but on the noteless exclamation of the word "Liar"
7 notes
·
View notes