Tumgik
#anti mspec lesbian
everyponie · 12 days
Text
"anti good faith identities" do you know how insane you sound
106 notes · View notes
lesbianamalvada · 6 months
Text
when I'm in a homophobia challenge and my opponent is attention starved bisexuals
Tumblr media
332 notes · View notes
honeylemony · 15 days
Text
Tumblr media
It was always about painting lesbians as predatory and less-than. It was always about removing our autonomy.
106 notes · View notes
violottie · 28 days
Text
since my old blog got nuked, i gotta make this post again because yall refuse to be anything but ignorant
lesbian sexuality ≠ heterosexual men's sexuality
lesbian attraction to women ≠ men's attraction to women
trans men cannot be lesbians, because they are men. if you think so, youre a transphobe as well as a lesbophobe.
lesbian attraction is not perverse, predatory, dehumanising to or sexualising of women's bodies
men have never and will never be included in lesbian sexuality and attraction under any circumstance
(and if your mind immediately goes to trans women and transfems when reading the above, congrats, youre a transphobe)
butch, femme, stud and stone are lesbian only identities
similarly, dyke is a slur that literally means lesbian. if youre not a lesbian, you're not a, nor can you 'reclaim', dyke.
butches and studs ≠ men or man-lite
butch ≠ masculine
femme ≠ feminine
transmasc ≠ trans man, therefore transmasc lesbians are a thing and trans men cannot ever be lesbians
trans women and transfems have been & will always be included in lesbian attraction, sexuality and community
trans lesbians & transfems can be butch
he/him lesbians ≠ (trans)masc, butch, stud lesbians
black lesbians ≠ automatically masc, butch, stud or tops
"bi lesbians" or "mspec lesbians" do not exist.
the split attraction model is for aromanticism and asexuality only. if you identify as such, youre just a bisexual who doesnt wanna unpack your internalised biphobia so resort to lesbophobia to cope with your self loathing caused by harmful stereotypes about your sexuality, which is bisexual. if you claim they do exist, you're both lesbophobic and biphobic
thank you for coming to my TedTalk. im sure you didnt listen to a word i said.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
77 notes · View notes
luvcalico · 10 months
Text
anyways dni if you think men or mspec people can id as lesbian <3 hope you get out of your idiocy soon
271 notes · View notes
lesbian-polls · 7 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Well, imitation is the biggest form of flattery (?)
This blog was created on the 16th this month, it is clearly a copy of me. Same flag, same name, same format. If he could have chosen the same name as me he fucking would have.
If you see this blog DOUBLE CHECK, ITS NOT ME. My blog has a hyphen between lesbian and polls, this blog does not.
I could laugh at this blog for an hour, but I better wrap it up and ask you to block this person and give them no mind, I've already done so. This is the lesbophobia website.
DON'T interact with hir, DON'T send anon hate, DON'T comment or reblog on hir posts. He doesn't deserve the attention and your time is valuable
41 notes · View notes
Text
idk i just think ppl should stop basing their identities off of what a book says (this is about Christians and lesboys)
35 notes · View notes
truthfully-system · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
This has to be a troll post right? This HAS to be a troll post
You made a flag for demiBOY lesbians, and have "men/male lesbians" in your dni... bro, bro.... BRO??? Am I real rn, its nearly 4 am and I havent slept this MUST be me hallucinating or dreaming!
This post is basically "^w^ masc-gender lesbian flags!!! But if you actually dare to identidy as masc-gender and call yourself a lesbian then these flags and this post isnt for youuuu"
I feel like im loosing my mind, wtf is this, I'm just- wtf is this 💀
34 notes · View notes
a-clucking-system · 2 months
Text
friendly reminder
VALID:
non binary lesbians ✅
agender lesbians ✅
genderless lesbians ✅
demigirl lesbians ✅
genderfluid lesbians ✅
librafemme / libraandrogyne lesbians ✅
transmasc lesbians (not male identifying) ✅
gender non-conforming lesbians, as long as they don't identify as male ✅
he/him lesbians, because pronouns ≠ gender ✅
NOT VALID:
demiboy lesbians ❌
libramasculine lesbians ❌
trans male lesbians ❌
cis male lesbians ❌
ANY OTHER MALE ALIGNED LESBIAN ❌❌❌❌❌
40 notes · View notes
Text
Twitter Dot Com when being used for internet discussions about irl stuff and fandom online as a social media platform nowadays is crazy because someone could say "The point of the label of being a lesbian is that it's about loving women and non-men as a woman or non-man esp in a society that forces cishet white male dominance over different marginalized groups and that saying that those who identify as men/the male gender can identity with the lesbian sexuality label is not only wrong but harmful and erasing queer history which is problematic" or "Dissociative Identity Disorder and Other Specified Dissociative Disorder is literally a medical condition thats origins are caused by trauma and that identifying as an 'Endogenic system' or any other sort of 'non-traumagenic' system is not only factually incorrect but hurts the plural community" while literally being a lesbian or a medically recognized system and people would still disagree with them. Please send help, the kids are infact not okay sadly/Neg.
26 notes · View notes
broodingnightgoddess · 3 months
Text
The irony of someone calling a lesbian a TERF cause we don't think trans men can be lesbians even with "the right hardware" as they themselves say.
I am certain trans women have been called TERF's for this reason. We have failed as a species
25 notes · View notes
Text
“hey guys i know you’ve been oppressed for your attraction to the same gender like i know i know that was a whole thing and a lot of you are exclusively attracted to the same gender and have met oppression for it but like… have you considered youre kinda… exclusionary for it?? like what do you mean youre only attracted to the same gender? well everyones a little bit so you might be attracted to the opposite gender too!! also i think the fact that the label you use with a whole history behind it is too exclusionary. like what do you mean its only for people exclusively attracted to the same gender?? what about people attracted to the opposite gender?? we have many labels about being attracted to multiple genders but like… ehhhh i dunno tbh theyre not queer enough yknow?? like who would just call themselves bisexual? it only exists because the big mean evil lesbians used their evil magic to send us to the moon for 1000 years. lesbians should just be attracted to men tbh. its just a phase”
28 notes · View notes
lesbianamalvada · 4 months
Text
mspec lesbian supporters is it okay if I call myself bisexual even though I'm not attracted to men and I'm exclusively attracted to women. can I become a spokesperson for the bisexual community and talk about how hard it is being bisexual while loudly proclaiming i'm only attracted to women. and then can I call all two-sex attracted bisexuals bigots for trying to gatekeep the bisexual community and get them kicked out of bisexual spaces. can I prove biphobes right with my very existence, that bisexuals can pick a gender and most are just faking it, and when any bisexual person calls me out they are accused of helping conservative politicians take our rights away. would that be okay?? i just want to know the rules to this.
85 notes · View notes
honeylemony · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
So is regular lesbianism just. Not inclusive of trans women and nonbinary people?
This is what I mean when I say bi-lesbian and mspec-lesbian pushers are being transphobic!!! Newsflash asshole! Lesbianism has included trans women and sapphic-comfortable nonbinary people the whole time!!!! My god!!!
You people want to paint lesbians as transphobes so bad. You can't imagine a lesbian who isn't transphobic. Imagining a trans lesbian would explode your brain.
50 notes · View notes
violottie · 19 days
Text
if you think "bi lesbians" or "mspec lesbians" or "lesbian trans men" are a thing, get the fuck off my blog.
aint no way you can be that stupid for free but yall continue to surprise my pessimism with the depth of this grave youre digging for yourself.
lesbians are not bisexual. lesbians are not attracted to ANY MAN, whether cis or trans or fluid. lesbians are NOT MEN, cis or trans or fluidly.
there is no argument in the defense of such nonsense that isnt either lesbophobic, biphobic, transphobic or all at once.
if you can't get your brain around the reality that lesbians will never and have never and are never interested in any engagement with men at all WHAT SO FUCKING EVER because lesbians, actual lesbians, would not EVER do that, you don't have one.
Tumblr media
64 notes · View notes
baradyke · 1 year
Text
like yes bisexual women in the past have been referred to or self-identified as lesbians. hell i don't even give a shit if a bisexual woman in a wlw relationship says that she's currently in a lesbian relationship. I DON'T CARE. but what DOES matter is that terminology is changing all the time and we have come up with new words for things that we didn't before and they have become universal. this is a good thing!
labels are created to use as a means to describe your identity in a way that wasn't already encompassed by previously existing ones. the lesbian identity was never about excluding bisexuals from our spaces and we have happily coexisted and thrived alongside bisexual women, given there is overlap in our identities. the word sapphic exists for a reason.
but to force multiple identities to identify as the same when their experiences are not, is gross and incredibly counterproductive. you're forcing lesbians, the ONLY sexuality that does not include attraction to men, to include those who do. living in the world that we do, are forced to live by the rules of patriarchy, alienated as a whole simply by virtue of not being attracted to men - some not wanting to associate with them at all - and wanting our own space for it. this is not being exclusionary, because we are still acknowledging that even if our experiences are different, we are no less or more queer for it. every group within the lgbt community deserves to keep the labels that describe their experiences separate (and no, don't use this as an excuse to separate things like bi and pan, or trans and nb, when they encompass the same experiences)
SO BASICALLY,
correct: bi women, especially those with a preference for women, and lesbians have a lot of overlapping experiences and either can identify as sapphic, but it is important to distinguish these labels given their individual experiences and history
incorrect: bi women can simultaneously identify as lesbians if they personally decide that they "feel" lesbian enough despite still being attracted to men. it's fine, my lesbian friend said it was ok!
225 notes · View notes