Tumgik
#Johnny Depp Case
sanjeev-thakur · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Congratulations Johnny... The world owes you a massive apology.
This is not just a victory for Johnny, but a victory for male victims of domestic abuse & false allegations. Captain Jack Sparrow has gifted male victims a voice.
Our Captain Jack Sparrow.
8 notes · View notes
whistle-free · 2 years
Text
What Does the Verdict mean?
There's been some confusion over what the verdict in the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard case actually meant, and hopefully this post can clear it up a little.
LegalEagle has a good video about this for anyone wishing to see in more depth about it.
The Case:
Johnny Depp brought a case against Amber Heard, suing her for defamation over the op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in which she described herself as a "public figure representing domestic abuse." and sought $50m in damages.
Amber Heard counter-sued for $100m, claiming Depp's attorney defamed her by declaring her allegations of abuse a hoax.
The Verdict:
The Jury found that AH defamed JD in three separate statements in The Washington Post piece, and that Depp defamed Heard with one statement his attorney made.
Depp was awarded $10m in compensatory, $5m in punitive (capped at $350,000).
Heard was awarded $2m in compensatory, $0 in punitive.
What Does it All Mean?
First, let's get the difference between "compensatory" and "punitive" out of the way.
Compensatory- compensates for damage suffered. It's money awarded to make up for the party's suffering.
Punitive- punishes for actions taken. If one party is awarded punitive damages, it means the jury wishes to punish the other party for their actions.
Next, the jury. You can find the full verdict form for the case here. Depp's claim will run pages 11-14, and Heard's claim will run pages 20-23.
The Jury ruled in favor of all three of JD's statement claims.
They found for all three statements from the op-ed that JD had proven all elements of defamation, and that AH made the claims with actual malice.*
This means they not only did not find AH's testimony and presented evidence to be credible against the testimony and evidence presented by JD, they found her to be untruthful when she described herself as a victim of domestic violence in her op-ed and so defamed JD by indirectly referring to him in the piece.
The Jury only ruled in favor of one of AH's statement claims.
This means they found that one of the statements made by Adam Waldman, namely the one where he calls AH's allegations a hoax and details how he believed how she and her friends pulled it off, to be defamatory.
The reason they would have found this hoax statement defamatory, and not the other hoax statement, would be because Waldman went into detail on how he believed they pulled it off, and stated such as fact rather than opinion. Mr. Waldman was not there to witness his claims and therefore could not know if they were true, and therefore the jury would have found this particular claim to be made with actual malice.*
This does not mean the jury found it true that JD abused AH, but rather they believed that Mr. Waldman was working as an agent of JD. (aka: "He's his lawyer and was acting on his behalf. Or, "they're the same person," figuratively speaking.)
*"Actual Malice" in legal terms simply means that the party knew what they said was not true. It has nothing to do with one party being vindictive of the other.
Other Questions about the verdict under the cut:
But why was JD's punitive capped? In Virginia punitive damages are capped at $350,000, so required by law the judge had to cap the punitive awarded to JD from $5m to $350,000. This made the total JD was awarded to $10.35 million.
Wouldn't the Jury have known the punitive would be capped? No. This is to prevent the Jury from shifting all the punitive damages into the compensatory damages award.
Will AH recieve $2m? No. It'll just be shaved off the compensatory she owes JD, bringing the total for JD to $8.35m that she will be required to pay.
If you have any additional questions you'd like to see answered, the askbox is open.
7 notes · View notes
sunflowerharrington · 2 years
Text
block me if you support amber heard, i will not be having any fans of hers in my follower count and if that means i lose half well so fucking be it
7 notes · View notes
ninjago1direction · 2 years
Text
The verdict is in!
Johnny Depp has officially won against Amber Heard
6 notes · View notes
legalupanishad · 2 years
Text
Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Case 2022: Case Analysis
Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Case 2022: Case Analysis
This article on ‘Jhonny Depp vs. Amber Heard Case’ is written By Managya an intern at Legal Upanishad. (Apply as a Law Intern at Legal Upanishad?) INTRODUCTION The verdict has been given on June 1, 2022 in the high profile case of defamation between Johnny C. Depp, II and Amber Laura Heard. Both parties to the case are famous actors of Hollywood who divorced after two years of marriage. The…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
asmr-wolf · 2 years
Text
Congratulations to Johnny Depp on his win in court against Amber Heard, nobody should have to be a victim of abusive behavior. As a person who went through a similar mistreatment as a teenager I felt for Johnny and how horrible it must have been to deal with a mean person like that. Congrats on your win and enjoy your freedom and peace.
1 note · View note
quicontent · 2 years
Text
Amber Heard Issues a Statement Following the Verdict: I'm Heartbroken
Following the news, the actress released a statement through her Twitter account where she expressed her disappointment with the decision and mentioned what she believes this case means for other women.
0 notes
lunastar92 · 2 years
Text
More Jury.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
8 notes · View notes
sanjeev-thakur · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
I meant Amber Turd
3 notes · View notes
ronon-dex · 1 month
Text
idk i think it's indicative of a wider societal problem when a man can openly brag about mistreating women and violently assaults a coworker on camera and you still have people on here making cutesy edits about him and people on twitter saying they think he's "cooler now". wwe has a history of men in power who abuse it freely and cm punk took that mentality to a place that didn't tolerate it. let's all reflect on that and why it's absolutely fucking wild you're making posts talking about wanting to suck the dick of a man who represents a culture of persistent abuse towards those younger and more vulnerable than them in particular.
43 notes · View notes
nellievances · 1 year
Text
wishing amber heard all the healing, happiness, and love. may she raise her daughter and live the rest of her life in peace. 💕
234 notes · View notes
pynkhues · 2 years
Note
Wait do you think Amber was innocent? She's clearly a f***ing nutcase... she made a mockery of actual abuse victims
Some reading for you, anon:
The Depp-Heard Trial is a Vector for Misogynystic Misinformation , Logically
Why the Depp-Heard trial is so much worse than you realize: Amber Heard is just the first target of a new extremist playbook, Vox
Misinformation and baseless rumors about Amber Heard rack up millions in views during Depp defamation trial, Insider
The Online Hate for Amber Heard, Pursuit
The Daily Wire Spent Thousands of Dollars Promoting Anti-Amber Heard Propaganda, Vice
The Amber Heard-Johnny Depp trial was an orgy of misogyny, The Guardian
TikTok’s Amber Heard Hate Machine, NY Times
Misleading YouTube Videos About Depp v. Heard Trial Thrive On the Platform, NewsWeek
Who won the Depp-Heard trial? Content creators that went all-in, Washington Post
Why Are So Many Survivors Supporting Johnny Depp? Harpers Bazaar
The Anti-Feminist Energy Fueling the Johnny Depp Misinformation Campaign, Mel Magazine
Why the Internet Hates Amber Heard, The Atlantic
898 notes · View notes
izzy-stradlins-harem · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
🔥 Izzy and Johnny Depp. 🔥
Tumblr media
Those two melt my cold dead heart
15 notes · View notes
quicontent · 2 years
Text
Johnny Depp Wins: Jury Ruled In Favor Of Johnny Depp In The Lawsuit
Heard wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post in which she detailed her experience of domestic abuse and sexual violence....
0 notes
radfemtaquito · 2 years
Text
The jury saying Amber Heard acted with "malice" by publishing that op-ed is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. She didn't even mention his name. The op-ed was about the misogynistic attacks she suffered after coming forward about her abuse and advocating on the behalf of domestic violence victims. Where's the malice?
407 notes · View notes
shyshitter · 11 months
Text
Interesting how Johnny depp donated his money to sick kid and environment charities instead of women’s rights charities like. Yea those things need funding too but buddy. Do you understand what you were on trial for?? Violence against women. You’re not gonna idk. Maybe try to amend that? Even for your image? biting scratching
46 notes · View notes