Tumgik
#I've seen the movie
crocchompers · 4 months
Note
If the darling brothers would be in DnD? In your opinion.
I honestly know nothing about DnD, aksjdasjkj sorry
31 notes · View notes
gaybichon · 2 years
Text
okay finally watching what we do in the shadows... i love nadja and her gay little husband
29 notes · View notes
swan2swan · 1 year
Text
Call mea fake Star Wars fan, but I was this many years old when I learned about Wan Sandage.
2 notes · View notes
nyaslashthreat · 8 months
Text
shout out to when i told my dad about goncharov and he figured out it was fake because i told him "1973 martin scorsese film with robert de niro" and he said that wasn't possible because the godfather came out in 1972 and the godfather part II came out in 1974 and they wouldn't have had time to make a movie in between. a perfectly good jest, foiled by this man's weird and vast knowledge set
20K notes · View notes
batfamfucker · 9 months
Text
What About The Kens?
I'm already seeing guys complain about the Barbie movie end, how they wanted Kens to be equal in Barbieland but were only given a small part on the Cabinet.
That's the point.
You're meant to feel bad for the Kens. Believe me, women aren't partying over the 'Returns to Matriarch' ending. Some will be, but the ones who also clocked the meaning behind it won't. Most women will also feel bad for Kens. Because it's an exact parallel to how women are treated in reality.
Men, you're meant to be upset. You're meant to question it. Because you're meant to feel it, and feel what that is like, so you can finally understand women. You're upset at seeing it in a movie, now imagine living it in reality. That's being a woman.
Kens were shit on so you could feel what it was like for women this entire time. Kens were being used as a placement so you could see yourself in a woman's shoes. A world dominated by the opposite sex. When Ken leaves, and sees male presidents (All men) for the first time, men being doctors and lawyers, etc, realising he is more than just a prop for Barbie, that was on purpose. Because that is the feeling that Barbie gave to women. It's why you cheer for him at first before he goes a little overboard.
It's exactly why the real world was an exaggerated Partriarchy and Barbieland an exaggerated Matriarchy. Neither wins. Neither is equal. None of them change for the better. It's why you should want women in the real world to be respected, and Kens in Barbieland to be respected.
The thing is, women also didn't win. Not in the real world. In Barbieland, yes, but not anywhere else. The real world didn't change. But you didn't notice, did you? That Gloria (The mother that helped Barbie) also didn't get a position on the Mattel board? It was still all men? Her idea was ignored until it made a profit, and the men will likely get the credit? She'll still just be the receptionist? The women representing the real world didn't get anymore opportunities, neither did the men in Barbieland.
I was hoping that Gloria would be offered a position on the board, and that the Barbie Cabinet would introduce another entire Cabinet to represent the Kens, but neither happened. They're complete mirrors.
But which one did you actually notice? Which did you actually care about? Now tell me again the ending was unfair. Because it was. For both parties. That's the point.
The difference is, Barbieland is fictional. You will walk out of the theatre with the reassurance that at least it's not real. Women won't. Women can't. Companies not giving women equal opportunities or voices isn't fictional, and that was just one example. There are no women presidents (USA at least) for us to go look at in the real world. We don't have somewhere to go to realise it could be different for us like Ken did. Barbie and make believe is all we had when we were kids, or even now.
You're supposed to be mad, just not at the movie.
8K notes · View notes
brotherdusk · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
hey. don't cry. matthew lillard with old springlock scars, ok?
5K notes · View notes
bug-gin · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Will-O'-the-Wisp dir. Joao Pedro Rodrigues
7K notes · View notes
fallloverfic · 10 months
Text
Some new "Nimona" movie art
This Ambrosius & Ballister poster has a bigger version but can't find an HQ version of it.
Tumblr media
And the complete collage
Tumblr media
This last one is kind of spoilery so I'll put it under a cut.
Tumblr media
3K notes · View notes
May I have your attention, please?
Just take a look at these guys,
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Love all of this to pieces.
7K notes · View notes
Nope (2022) isn't asking us to question or condemn the concept of spectacle, it's asking us to question the things we choose to turn into spectacle. It's a condemnation of spectacles that exploit the suffering of living creatures, human and animal alike.
14K notes · View notes
mynnub-blog · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The hug to end all hugs <3
3K notes · View notes
francis-ford-kofola · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
HUNDREDS OF BEAVERS (2022) dir. Mike Cheslik (official website of the movie)
557 notes · View notes
ephos · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
doth my eyes deceive me is thy floor a trans flag?
3K notes · View notes
canisalbus · 3 months
Note
I have a phobia of dogs like can't stand seeing images of them phobia but I love your work so much, I don't know what it is but there's something beautiful about how I can look at it without feeling that phobia. Like being on top of a mountain and seeing the view of the world below or how fire looks pretty close up. Your art to me feels like that scene in fantastic mr fox with the wolf.
Ah, that's both heartwarming and very interesting, I've never heard of any cynophobes liking my work! Thank you!
(I won't bother you about it of course, but I can't help but wonder if it's the same thing for all furry/anthro art you see or for some reason just me, and if it's the latter, what could be making my stuff more palatable for someone who is that intensely uncomfortable with canines. My style isn't realistic but it isn't super stylized and exaggerated either. Is it about the anthropomorphization and the humanlike features, expressions and behavior? When I draw actual dog-shaped-dogs, are they harder to look at?).
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
536 notes · View notes
pencil-amateur · 2 months
Text
I think the part where lisa is like "you probably didn't even drive back when you were alive. you probably rode on one of those bicycles with the big stupid wheel in the front" and the creature looks at her and she's like "you did" is really funny
438 notes · View notes
nonbinaryeye · 11 months
Text
I've seen people talking about so many different aspects of Across the Spider-verse and all the different Spider-person variations but not so much about the main villian the Spot.
Because he was just some guy, some regular scientist. Looking at what kind of people he worked for it cannot be said he was exactly good but he also wasn't evil, he was just doing his job and happened to be at a wrong time on a wrong place.
And his life seems ruined, he's this wierd spot being but his Forst thought isnt even to plot revenge. He's "shit how do I get a job now", when he decides to steal he decides to steal an ATM machine because he doesn't wanna rob some small business owner it's just such an interesting detail.
Only after being antagonised and called third league villian and only after after Miles does not realise and refuses to acknowledge and listen how he was accomplice in his making the Spot starts his revenge quest. And he's fascinated by his own powers, he's far from mentally stable but he was not evil mad scientist, he's just victim of circumstances.
2K notes · View notes