I’m finally going to lay out my thoughts on the “Battlestar Galactica” revival series
The 2003 BSG relaunch is apparently seeing something of a resurgence right now. I’ve seen more and more people discovering it online over the past few months and beginning full-series watches. I’m happy for any old TV series to get rediscovered (Although the thought that a show I watched as it aired is now considered “old” is disheartening), but I’ll be honest that I was never as in-love with the series as others seem to be. And after seeing so many people talking about how it’s one of the greatest underappreciated shows of the ‘00s I’ve got to get out my thoughts.
It's not a BAD show, not by any means, but I do honestly think it was much more impressive at the time it came out than it is now. It tried to do new things for TV sci-fi in the early 2000s, and now that other shows are doing those same things better it doesn't stand out. It was the novelty that made it seem so amazing at first.
One of the things it is praised for is that it brought in long-form storytelling from the beginning. The standard for ‘90s sci-fi was to slowly introduce ongoing plotlines into episodic standalone stories, and BSG had direct episode-to-episode continuity starting from square one. Except that BSG had no plan for what the ongoing storyline would be, despite frequent on-screen references to “the plan” (And even the eventual release of a film called “The Plan”). The writers have admitted that they did not start the series with any idea where they were going, so plot threads would drag on and climax with no buildup or any emotional oomph. The exemplar in the beginning was Helo’s entire story on Caprica in season one: He wasn’t supposed to reappear after the pilot miniseries, but the staff liked him so much they brought him back for the series and didn’t bother to figure out why the Cylons were observing him and sparing him until season two. So all of his scenes are filled with pseudo-mysterious conversations from the observing Cylons to cover up the fact that there was no plan. The eventual reveal that they’re trying to see if “love” will allow Cylons to bear living children was just bizarre and nonsensical in my opinion.
Babylon 5, which aired 10 years before BSG, was conceived with a clear arc for the entire plot so they could put things in the first season that foreshadowed what was to come in the last. But BSG, despite being praised for ‘pioneering’ serious serialization in TV Sci-Fi, couldn’t even foreshadow the rest of the first season from the pilot.
The series is also praised for its character development, when almost all prior TV shows had a mandate to keep development to a minimum so as to make all episodes accessible even if viewed out of order or without context. And the characters definitely do change over the course of the series. Except, just like with the main story plotline, the character arcs were not planned in advance. The writers have admitted that the reveal at the end of season three that four recurring characters have been Cylons all along was not planned in advance at all. They specifically said they picked these characters based purely on who would be the biggest surprise. There was no foreshadowing at all for the audience to have picked up on earlier in the series, since until they made the decision while writing those episodes the characters weren’t Cylons.
In fact, they even needed to put in retcons to patch over this twist, since it directly contradicted their own canon and the in-series mythology.
This end result was that the show was “pretty good”, and it had some individual episodes and arcs that moved up to “great”, but it was dragged down as a whole. It had meandering plotlines, “shocking” twists with no logic or emotional foundation, and a general lack of focus. Season three is where I lost interest, and season four is just a mess. Even the more devoted fans of the series are heavily critical of the finale, and personally I think the ultimate fate of the characters was just plain bad.
And -- again -- it’s still not a bad show overall. I saw much worse shows on TV in 2003, and I’ve seen much worse shows on TV right now. None of these faults take away from the phenomenal acting that the cast put into their performances, or the truly beautiful soundtrack (The soundtrack is the one area that I think surpasses the hype for this show). Even the CGI holds up pretty well twenty years later. But I just can’t get behind the “This was one of the greatest shows of the era” brouhaha that’s bubbling up.
10 notes
·
View notes
Milkshake Duck
the idea:
milkshake duck has become a shorthand for someone who gains prominence, usually on the internet for meme content. then after increased public visibility and scrutiny, they put their foot in their mouth and/or do something problematic, eliciting a follow-up public backlash. this is can be, but isn't necessarily, related to the gartner hype cycle and hype backlash.
10 notes
·
View notes
Is it just me, or are the aggressive Hazbin Hotel haters just Vox scrambling for Alastor’s attention and coping when nothing happens
Critics and Haters are different! You don’t have to like the show but making post after post hating on it, threatening the creators, or insulting people to convince them why they can’t like the show is
1- obsessive
2- honestly cringe
LIKE WHAT YOU LIKE MY FRIENDS and if you don’t like it, that’s fine, just CHILL!🩷
122 notes
·
View notes
I watch WWE from time to time, as it’s included with my Peacock subscription, and the Backlash crowd was absolutely electric, woowwwwww
2 notes
·
View notes
and they're all singing his song too.....hold up while i cry ;___;
5 notes
·
View notes