Learning is fun, I too throw unloved vegetables back at researchers.
Animals know when they are being treated unfairly (and they don't like it)
Humans beings appear to be hardwired to have a sense of fairness. This is puzzling from an evolutionary perspective, which you would have thought would mean we were predisposed to seek advantage for ourselves and our families wherever possible. But in fact a sense of fairness is important for humans to be able to help each other. Human cooperation is based on reciprocal altruism â we help people because theyâve either helped us in the past or they may help us in the future.
This form of cooperation is only possible when individuals are able to keep track of other individualsâ efforts and payoffs â and a sense of fairness helps with this. But what about non-human animals? Is sense of fairness unique in differentiating humans from other animals or has it evolved in other non-human animals too?
Thereâs a way of testing for this in animals using an âinequity aversion taskâ.Â
One test subject receives a reward for completing a task, while an experimental partner gets a âbooby prizeâ â something they donât particularly like. Youâd imagine that individual animals that have a strong sense of fair play would either stop taking part in the experiment or refuse the treat.
One of the first species that was tested for inequity aversion were brown capuchin monkeys. In a task where the monkeys had to exchange a token for a treat, one individual was given a piece of cucumber in exchange for a token, whereas a model individual â another monkey not the focus of the experiment â in an adjacent cage got a grape for the same action. Capuchin monkeys prefer grapes to cucumbers â and the individual receiving the cucumber soon started to âprotestâ by throwing the unloved vegetable back at the experimenter
Read more via PhysÂ
331 notes
¡
View notes
Oh Frans
The link between language and cognition is a red herring
by Frans de WaalÂ
Scientists working on animal cognition often dwell on their desire to talk to the animals. Oddly enough, this particular desire must have passed me by, because I have never felt it. I am not waiting to hear what my animals have to say about themselves, taking the rather Wittgensteinian position that their message might not be all that enlightening. Even with respect to my fellow humans, I am dubious that language tells us what is going on in their heads. I am surrounded by colleagues who study members of our species by presenting them with questionnaires. They trust the answers they receive and have ways, they assure me, of checking their veracity. But who says that what people say about themselves reveals actual emotions and motivations?
This might be true for simple attitudes free from moralisations (âWhat is your favourite music?â), but it seems almost pointless to ask people about their love life, eating habits, or treatment of others (âAre you pleasant to work with?â). It is far too easy to invent post-hoc reasons for oneâs behaviour, to be silent about oneâs sexual habits, to downplay excessive eating or drinking, or to present oneself as more admirable than one really is.
Read more via AeonÂ
270 notes
¡
View notes
âAt about nine to 10 weeks, infant gorillas begin to crawl on their own and soon walk on all four limbs. A white patch of hair appears on their rumps at about the same time they begin to walk. The white patch helps the mother keep track of the infant and assists other group members in identifying the gorilla as an infant. The rump patch begins to disappear at about age 3, the same age that weaning usually begins.â- (animalcorner.co.uk)
Gorilla- Enzi, Busch Gardens Tampa, 2016
0 notes
LET THE LEARNING BEGIN
Flat-footed competitors have fighting advantage
Source: National Science FoundationÂ
A heel-down posture â a feature that separates great apes, including humans, from other primates â confers advantages in fighting, according to a new study published today in the journal Biology Open.
Standing with heels planted allows more swinging force when fighting, says biologist David Carrier of the University of Utah, lead author of the study, which was funded by the National Science Foundationâs (NSF) Division of Integrative Organismal Systems. In contrast, many other species of mammals, including most primates, stand, walk and run with their heels elevated, and on the balls of their feet or toes, a posture important for quickness.
âThis story is one more piece in a broader picture, a suite of distinguishing characteristics that are consistent with the idea that weâre specialized at some level for aggressive behavior,â Carrier says.
Program director Emily Carrington of NSFâs Division of Organismal Systems says the findings provide insight into how animals respond to danger.
âCertain species tend to be good at fighting or fleeing, but not both,â Carrington says. âThis study provides insight into the basis for this trade-off. Animals that use their heels to plant their feet firmly to the ground, like bears, badgers and great apes, are able to deliver stronger blows to their opponents.â
The physiological traits that confer advantages in fighting are different from those required for other tasks, such as running.
âIf aggression was important in our past, we should see evidence of it in our anatomy,â Carrier says.
Read more via EurekAlertÂ
21 notes
¡
View notes