Tumgik
#pissed for the people who worked there. pissed for crwby specifically.
bookishjules · 2 months
Text
working so hard to hold back screams and tears rn.. fuck you wb
9 notes · View notes
rwby-sk · 3 years
Note
how do you think the fandom would react to canon sk
My greatest fear is that SK never happens. My second greatest fear is that SK does happen and the FNDM ruin it
If SK is done the way I'd hope, very slowly starting as reluctant partners to friends to slow-burn lovers; it might all turn out okay. Once they get some kind of cannon interaction, especially with Neo upset about Roman's death, I think we'll get more people shipping it
I've seen a lot of RWBY fans dismiss SK as a gross ship. And I get it. A lot of the stuff out there has been based on Power Fantasy FNDM Jaune being with Sex Fantasy Pixie Dreamgirl Neo. I made this blog specifically to show the FNDM that they could work together with wholesome content
But there are still people who just see it as the Jaune-Power Fantasy. I get it
-
If it becomes canon, there will be an influx in those shippers. For sure. They'll make more content and be gross about it
I'll make my content too, and hopefully some of the other good people I know will make positive posts
Generally though, I think RWBY does a really good job with its relationships. All of the canon ships have big followings. Sure there are people out there who hate Renora or Bumbleby, but there are way more who love them
I trust CRWBY to tell a great story no matter what we get
The FNDM? We'll have to see how they react
I'll be pissed if people come out of the woodwork saying they shipped it all along though
Like, I'm pretty sure I would have noticed
11 notes · View notes
skybird13 · 4 years
Text
*sigh* Okay...
I’ve been debating on whether or not to make this post. Not because it doesn’t need to be made, but because I’m not sure I’m emotionally up for it. But at the end of the day, staying quiet is exactly what got us into this mess, and curling into a sad little ball isn’t going to change what happened, and this particular shit needs to be called out and acknowledged. 
I was asked to address something posted by Eddy Rivas, one of the writers of RWBY, on Reddit yesterday. It was a shortlived post because apparently he or someone who read it realized what a monumentally bad idea it was, but sadly for him, my fellow cockroach gays are pissed as hell and we have screenshot capabilities. I don’t care that he removed/edited the post. This was still his instinctive response to the absolute pain caused by him and the rest of CRWBY as a result of volume 7 episode 12:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I am so damn tired and so hurt. But I am going to do my best to address this in a civil and reasonable way. 
The Problem With Judgment Calls
First of all, to an extent, I understand the predicament Eddy describes. I really do. I get that being on the creative end of a popular web series is very different from being on the fandom end, and conventional wisdom dictates that creators should do their best to make sure the two don’t mix past a certain point. That necessary separation probably does make these kinds of judgment calls difficult. 
The problem is that several members of CRWBY (including writers, animators both former and current, social media managers, and the marketing team specifically) violated that boundary more than once long before episode 12 aired. There were so many things that factored into Fair Game gaining traction as quickly as it did, and many of those things came from the deliberate way that many members of CRWBY interacted with the fandom outside of the show itself. From the official RWBY Twitter account to the suggestive tweets made by a former animator, to the Twitter and Tumblr posts made by a current animator, this ship was heavily and unambiguously encouraged and leaned on multiple times over the course of this volume. 
Sure, you can make the claim that you can’t control the animators (especially if they no longer work for you), or that the creators and the marketing team are two separate entities and that the actions of one do not necessarily reflect the intentions of the other (both things also stated by Eddy Rivas in a series of Tweets). And perhaps some of that is accurate. It points towards a fundamental lack of oversight and cohesiveness in the organization that is Rooster Teeth, and that should absolutely be addressed moving forward, but quite frankly, in this case, it doesn’t even matter.
The fact of the matter, Mr. Rivas, is that the boundary was violated. Multiple times. On your end. These types of judgment calls are not a one size fits all, and the moment active members of CRWBY took action to encourage something you knew was going to cause pain, it should have been addressed. I’m not putting that on you personally, because as a writer I realize you probably don’t have that type of authority, but someone there should have put a stop to it. There is the matter of the personal responsibility shirked by the two animators who contributed to this mess, and frankly, they should have known better, but this does not excuse CRWBY’s collective silence.
The fact of the matter is that due to the actions taken by CRWBY both in and outside of the show (including the things you could and could not control) you absolutely reached a point where that boundary should have been purposefully crossed in order to mitigate damage. It doesn’t matter what got you or us there. It doesn’t matter whether or not it was intentionally done (it was, let’s not kid ourselves). Things built up, hopes were raised as a direct result of your actions, and you all reached a point where you were morally obligated to say something. Do I suggest a single individual should have taken this on? No. I understand the legal ramifications of that. But CRWBY as a whole and RT as the production studio absolutely should have stepped forward. Would that have fully removed the pain and the disappointment? No. But you wouldn’t be facing the backlash you are right now if you had. 
The Problem with One-Size-Fits-All
Closely related to the previous point is the fact that you, Mr. Rivas, seem to be under the impression that a single judgment call policy should and can apply to all situations equally. That’s not the case. We’re not talking about other ships here, hypothetical, canonical, realistic, unrealistic, or otherwise. We’re talking about this ship. 
The Fair Game ship was the first and only indication we had in seven volumes of RWBY that a prominent mlm relationship might be coming in to play. You have no other relationships of this nature in the show. You don’t even have other male characters who might be able to qualify as gay or bisexual who play major roles. Add on to that the fact that you planned to have one of these characters die in the most brutal and graphic death scene we have gotten to date in RWBY, and no. I’m sorry. That flimsy defense doesn’t stand. This ship was unique, it appealed to a very underserved segment of your fandom, and it should have been treated with the levity it deserved. 
You make the argument that saying something about this ship but not others wasn’t plausible. The issue with that, sir, is one of trust. Up to this point, I and a lot of people I know trusted you, which means you can get away with building up relationships without ever coming out to confirm or deny them offscreen. As long as you understand the narrative promises you’re making as a storyteller to your audience, and understand the importance of fulfilling them through narrative payoff at some point in the story, we’re usually pretty willing to follow you and watch it unfold. This is how writing works. You have to be aware of the promises you’re making and you have to be able to follow through on them in satisfying ways. This goes double if you plan to fulfill them in unexpected ways (note the word fulfilled still applies). If you don’t do that, trust is broken and you have a problem. 
Fair Game is unique in that you knew from the beginning that trust was going to not only be violated but brutally so. CRWBY made promises with Clover and Qrow that they never intended to keep, and that is one of the core issues here. If you want to cling to the excuse that it was all unintentional (again, one I do not buy), that only means you absolutely should have said something to that effect long before we ever got to this point. It would have given nothing about the plot away to let us know that wasn’t the intended direction and it would have calmed down the excitement that built up so quickly around the ship. It certainly would have prevented a lot of people from being emotionally and psychologically damaged as a result of having that trust destroyed. 
Not saying something about relationships that may or may not happen is VERY different from not saying something about a ship that you know is not going to happen because you plan to brutalize and murder one of the characters on screen in spite of the narrative promises made. Particularly when the ship in question would have offered rep to people who thus far in the show ( when we’re over halfway through the series) still have none. 
No rep to be found here...
I’m not sure I should even have to address this but apparently, it needs to be said. It will be short because it’s a pretty damn simple answer.
You want to know “how well [saying no rep to be found here would] have gone over?”  A hell of a lot better than the queerbaiting fest you have victimized us all to for the last three months.  Would you still have had disappointed fans on your hands? Absolutely. But the psychological and emotional damage you all caused in episode 12 could have been so easily avoided, and that should have taken precedence over whatever tension you wanted to maintain between these characters in the show. 
This should not have been a difficult decision, and quite frankly, the fact that you don’t understand this is a little alarming. 
We Are Not a Shopping Montage
Alright. Here is where my civility is going to deteriorate noticeably, so fair warning.
You had the audacity to compare the emotional trauma of hundreds of LGBTQ fans to the disappointment of not getting a fucking shopping montage??? You even acknowledge that on an emotional level these two things are nowhere near being the same thing, and you still tried to justify your actions and the actions of CRWBY with it? That emotional fallout is the thing that matters here. 
But there’s even more to it than that.
The hopes for a shopping montage came from a single Tweet from the official RWBY Twitter (if I remember right) about a montage scene being in volume 7. That was it. That was all fans had to go off of. This absolutely was a case of imaginations running wild and people hoping for a scene that, quite frankly, in light of the show’s trajectory since volume 3, wasn’t a reasonable expectation to begin with. CRWBY was in no way complicit in or responsible for this expectation that I know of, and even if you were.... It. Was. A. Shopping. Montage.
And you dare to compare that with the intentional queer coding of Qrow and Clover’s relationship in the writing, the animation choices, the character design for Clover, and the behavior of CRWBY on social media, only for Clover to die horrifically and for Qrow to be absolutely destroyed emotionally and mentally on-screen??? You dare to relate the disappointment of people who didn’t get a pointless shopping scene with the trauma of watching a loved character’s murder and another loved character’s emotional/mental destruction??? Really? That seemed like an appropriate thing to say?
I don’t even know what else to say to this except absolute world-shattering shame on you, sir. How dare you?
And then to top all of this off, instead of apologizing, instead of showing some contrition, you tried to delete this post and pretend you never said it. Did you hope we wouldn’t notice? That we wouldn’t react if you tried to take it down? Were you even the one who realized what you said or did you need it pointed out to you?
You should not be a writer, sir. You sure as hell should not be a creator of content that engages with people on an emotional level because you clearly have no respect for it and no understanding of the responsibility you bear because of it. 
What is wrong with you?
Tagging @fairgame-is-endgame​ who asked me to say something on this absolute bullshit. 
601 notes · View notes
convoy914 · 3 years
Text
Okay, Swapsy, here’s my…opinions, I guess, all laid out. I think. I might be inconsistent here. Probably a bit overly harsh as well. Probably fucked this up. Probably severely. Likely incoherent. Might edit it at times. Nonetheless, if you for some reason want to, here it is. If so, please make sure to read ALL of it. It’s all important. IF you want. Don’t have to. Everyone else don't touch this post please. Bit personal
Okay fine, you want my “professional“ opinion? You project onto Penny and that has cause you to be halfway biased regarding certain other characters. Note that I said “halfway”. This isn’t a “you’re wrong completely and dumb” thing. It’s just, well, something I’ve seen before. The “manpain” argument any time he did ANYTHING, and then last year…last year was not fun. And it feels like you’re refusing to even consider my points and painting me with the same brush as the “it was fine, actually” part of the fandom. Like how they painted you as RWDE for your criticisms of that moment. I don’t think it’s intentional to be clear
Tell me, do you think Ruby would hold Jaune SOLEY responsible FOREVER…or will the eventual conclusion be “I hate Cinder even more than I thought was possible”? Not how YOU would react, you’ve made THAT abundantly clear, I mean how the CHARACTERS would react. The problem is that you interpret Penny a certain way, and so are unable to interpret what happened in any other way, and so of course you can’t stand the sight of the guy who did it. But in this ONE case, context is important…but NOT in the way people say.
Here’s the problem: The “choice” was regarding who got the Maiden Powers, NOT dying. HOWEVER, as I said, the writing fucked up SEVERELY when it came to distinguishing that. That‘s just a fact. I’m not defending that. What I AM saying, however, is that I think you’re letting your projection onto Penny color your interpretation of what exactly happened. NOT THAT IT WAS WELL WRITTEN, IT STILL WASN’T, BUT THAT I THINK THERE’S BIAS HERE. You act like it was a depressed girl committing suicide and just using Cinder as an excuse, and thus Jaune is literal scum, that there was malicious intent behind what he did, but I can’t agree with that interpretation, because it ignores the context, badly written as it was. I GET IT, tho. I really do. I get it more than THEY could. Speaking of whom…
And I think it’s important to note the role the fandom played in this. Them insisting that nothing worth fighting over happened, that there’s nothing wrong with what happened, no problem at all. This, I think, caused you to turn more and more against the stuff surrounding the moment and I’ve said this all before. The relevant part is that I’ve seen other people arguing with you on this, and you’ve dismissed all of them cause it seems to you that they’re excusing something awful. That they’re just allistics people who don't get the urge and so don’t see the problem. Given their failure to truly acknowledge the problem, I can’t blame you. Trust me, they piss me off QUITE a bit as well at times. But I hope that I’ve demonstrated that I understand the problem. I also hate that plot point. And I still feel this way regarding Jaune.
My point is: I think it’s possible to despise that plot point while not treating Jaune specifically as If even I, who thinks that moment was terribly written and a gigantic fucking waste AND understand the concerns as an autistic often THAT kind of depressed person, thinks that this is disproportionate, what does that SAY, exactly? Look, ultimately it’s opinions about a web show, and there’s the bias on my part to consider. The idea I have in my head that all this is me trying to get you to drop your own discomfort for my own sake. That I'm not being objective here. That I’m being manipulative here. That you’ll just see this as another person berating you for being uncomfortable. And hell, maybe it is. As this whole thing has proven, intention isn’t everything.
So what’s the “solution”? Volume 9‘s coming up and Jaune is A) a part of it, and B) not going to be treated as Irredeemable Satan until the end of the series. And as an autistic often suicidal person, I don’t have a problem with that. I don’t think the characters hating him FOREVER is proportionate given the circumstances. I don’t call it “manpain” and I’ve seen these arguments before. This is all very familiar to me, and maybe that’s unfair. And the story CRWBY TRIED to tell, I think there’s merit. With any other character, anyways. The importance of LIVING, even if it’s for a short while. It could even have worked as presented with just (1) change. He tried to heal her and it just hurt her more. That would be it. But they didn’t, and so here we are. So, what are you going to DO here? Cause it’s clear you’ve not really come to terms with it. I don’t blame you, and the fandom’s not helped. I don’t know what to DO here, is the ultimate point. I want to help you come to terms with this, but I don’t know how. I don’t know if THIS is it, but nonetheless, here’s my feelings on the matter. Sometimes. My thoughts on this are kinda mixed
1 note · View note
kob131 · 4 years
Text
https://izetarion.tumblr.com/post/189410998186/theres-two-versions-of-adam-taurus?is_liked_post=1
Monty!Adam: Created by Monty Oum, a minority. Focused on the Faunus, while wanting to get back at the humans for their mistreatment of his kind, a man of revolution who was focused on the safety of his people - seen as how he was strong-armed into working with Cinder Fall after getting her maiden powers, wasn’t so psychopathic that he would turn on his own kind and kill humans out of sheer glee (seen with Cinder and her lot, as he gave them a chance to leave), prioritizes the cause over a cat girl, who was his student - sharing a “student-mentor” relationship as established by the show’s creator as well as said cat girl (“Forget it! It’s time I headed back to Mistral!”), has a legitimate reason to hate humans - especially those affiliated with the Schnee Dust Company, very charismatic, somewhat of a fallen mentor figure given the way the catgirl described him, his cause steadily consuming him (“I had someone I care for, who changed…”), is one of the most popular male characters in the series in the first half of RWBY - despite having little screentime, has an aesthetically-pleasing look to him, compared to DMC!Vergil and Jetstream Sam - two of the most iconic video game characters, in terms of looks and fighting style, Adam Taurus fans signs his adoption papers so that Miles and Kerry would never touch him. People use this version in their fanfics and RPs, turning him into a redeemable person while still keeping his morally grey aspects. Tauradonna is more mutual than lovey-dovey.
Okay so let’s break this down and show this is bullshit.
“Focused on the Fanaus-”
He is never shown to actually help any Fanaus and all White Fang activity, ESPECIALLY in Volumes 1 and 2, revolves around fucking over human. In fact, considering Tuskon, the fact that Vale does not have discrimination against Fanaus and V1 E1 openly says a peaceful protest of Fanaus was interrupted by the WF (” In other news, this Saturday's Faunus Civil Rights protest turned dark when members of the White Fang disrupted the ceremony. The once peaceful organization has now disrupted...”): Adam has acted AGAINST the Fanaus since LITERALLY the first episode.
“A man of revolution who was focused on the safety of his people-”
Which is why, in an EARLIER episode than the one you cite (Volume 2 Episode 12 meaning MONTY was in charge here as we know since he was cited with putting in the Raven scene in the SAME EPISODE against Miles and Kerry’s wishes): Adam gave no shits about his men DYING when he openly said he’d convince them to work with Cinder without so much as a glare at her. BTW, Adam specifically cited Cinder being HUMAN for the reason why he didn’t want to kill his men (’I won’t sacrifice my men for a human cause’). If the human part wasn’t the reason why he wasn’t agreeing with Cinder, why would his dialogue not be ‘I won’t sacrifice my men, no matter what.”?
“ wasn’t so psychopathic that he would turn on his own kind and kill humans out of sheer glee (seen with Cinder and her lot, as he gave them a chance to leave)-”
Nuh uh, in the same Volume Adam out right STABS Blake and says he wants to destroy everything she loves, in the previous Volume he didn’t care about his men dying and said nothing about trying to DESTROY VALE killing THOUSANDS if not MILLIONS of people (including FANAUS) and at the VERY beginning, he tried to blow up a train car full of people who hadn’t even raised a finger against him even though, as Blake shows, he could have detached the train.
“ prioritizes the cause over a cat girl, who was his student - sharing a “student-mentor” relationship as established by the show’s creator as well as said cat girl (“Forget it! It’s time I headed back to Mistral!”),”
Except that, again. Adam STABS Blake and outright shows malice towards her in the SAME VOLUME, Arkos shows mentorship and romance are NOT exclusive and even THAT line is delivered with Adam looking furious clearly showing he’s hung up about Blake.
“ has a legitimate reason to hate humans - especially those affiliated with the Schnee Dust Company-”
Not really, especially since Adam was shown to be selfish in previous Volumes so why would he care about other people? In fact, the ‘fuckboi’ Adam you’ll bitch about later has the reason to hate humans, especially those with the SDC. This version, since he’s apparently completely seperate, is just racist.
“very charismatic”
Never shown OR said. Just projecting.
“ somewhat of a fallen mentor figure given the way the catgirl described him,”
Notice how here they don’t actually say WHAT the description is despite KNOWING about quotes? That’s because there’s nothing actually said in the show that is ambiguously about a mentorship.
“ his cause steadily consuming him (“I had someone I care for, who changed…”)”
Doesn’t prove anything AND it coinsides with ‘fuckboi’ Adam.
“ is one of the most popular male characters in the series in the first half of RWBY - despite having little screentime,”
So is Kirito, wanna guess what V1-2 Adam and Kirito have in common? They don’t have defined personality and their popularity came from people projecting onto them.
“ has an aesthetically-pleasing look to him, compared to DMC!Vergil and Jetstream Sam - two of the most iconic video game characters, in terms of looks and fighting style”
Both of which are incredibly common in anime.
“ Adam Taurus fans signs his adoption papers so that Miles and Kerry would never touch him”
Too bad according to you, they weren’t the ones who ruined Adam. No no, your issues, as I have shown, existed with MONTY. So you better start smack talking him... what’s that, if you did that you couldn’t profit off his name and his fanboys would rip you to shreds? Maybe you shouldn’t be a disingenuous fuck.
‘ People use this version in their fanfics and RPs,’
And people turn Jaune into a generic self insert and Ruby into an edgy angsty psuedo anti hero- that means nothing.
“ turning him into a redeemable person while still keeping his morally grey aspects.”
So basically making him a generic anti villian instead of a tragic case of someone not being able to get over their past tramua.
“ Tauradonna is more mutual than lovey-dovey.”
And it’s more ‘abusive’ than mutual.
Fuckboi!Adam: Created by Miles and Kerry, two amateurish white guys noted for writing sub-par comedy segments and part of the upper echelons of Rooster Teeth. Born out of the criticism of “show, don’t tell aspect” of the show - barely having any visible evidence of Faunus racism, born out of the two admitting they couldn’t write a racism sub-plot - despite having the money and resources to do so, established as an abuser by CRWBY and demonized heavily by them and the fanbase despite little evidence of such prior to because of catgirl’s various descriptions of him pointing towards someone “dear” (“More of a mentor, actually…”),  “hElLo, My LoVe!” “tHe bElLaDoNnAs HaVe CaUsEd Me NoThInG bUt GrIeF!”, “sO i JuSt wAsN’t GoOd EnOuGh FoR yOu.”, A fedora wearing crazed nazi ex-boyfriend, DMC-Reboot!Vergil but with the edgelord turned to 11, “Tauradonna? More like Tauradon’t!”, How many zippers does your dumbass outfit need? lol, Why did your voice crack?, Even his own VA hate him, Is an incel-ass bitch, Gaston apparently, Lol he’s attempting the birdbox challenge, That stupid ass face reveal did nothing as the damage was done, The fandom - primarily BMBLB, and CRWBY sing of his death (“Ding-dong the bitch is dead!”) - with the BMBLB fandom using his death as major evidence of their ship becoming canon. Also, his death caused such dissonance in the fandom that shit hit the fan in all kinds of ways, not to mention his death started the slow deterioration of RT - embodying the spite element that Blake attributed him, probably because he was pissed at CRWBY to the point where his hatred manifested as a curse - causing their various injustices against their employees to come out and be heavily criticized as a result (No, seriously, RT is visibly crumbling shortly after his demise).
“ Created by Miles and Kerry-”
And yet will somehow completely overlap with the Volumes Monty had the most control over.
“ two amateurish white guys”
Miles is part Mexician.
“ noted for writing sub-par comedy segments”
While Monty is noted for never writing whatsoever so i guess that means you think Miles and Kerry are better.
“ Born out of the criticism of “show, don’t tell aspect” of the show - barely having any visible evidence of Faunus racism, born out of the two admitting they couldn’t write a racism sub-plot - despite having the money and resources to do so,”
The criticism being located SOLELY in Volumes 1 and 2 Aka MONTY.
“ established as an abuser by CRWBY and demonized heavily by them and the fanbase despite little evidence of such prior to because of catgirl’s various descriptions of him pointing towards someone “dear” (“More of a mentor, actually…”)’“
You know...despite the fact that every single aspect of Adam’s character has been shown WITH MONTY, as I showed above.
“ “hElLo, My LoVe!” “
Located in Volume 3, which you cite as a Volume where ‘Monty!’ Adam existed.
“ “tHe bElLaDoNnAs HaVe CaUsEd Me NoThInG bUt GrIeF!” “
Huh, if you spelled “Belladonna” as “Miles and Kerry”, that sounds an awful lot like you...oh
“ “sO i JuSt wAsN’t GoOd EnOuGh FoR yOu.” “
They scream as Rooster Teeth ignores them.
“ A fedora wearing crazed nazi ex-boyfriend”
Never actually shown wearing a fedora or ever showing any personbality traits associated with it...but then again, you know what they say about mirrors...
Also at least it’s better than ‘blank edgy emo teen’ he was in Volume 3 which you loved apparently.
“ DMC-Reboot!Vergil but with the edgelord turned to 11″
Uh oh, Op’s brain rotted so he can’t actually make arguments....oh wait, he was always like that.
“ “Tauradonna? More like Tauradon’t!” “
So basically ‘wah wah wah. my otp is not canon’.
“ How many zippers does your dumbass outfit need?”
Dunno, why is wearing a tux as a freedom fighter and sticks out like a sore thumb?
“ Why did your voice crack?”
Why did he sound fourteen in Volume 3?
“ Even his own VA hate him,”
Ever since Volume 3 which you cite as “Monty!Adam”
“ Is an incel-ass bitch, Gaston apparently”
Or you know, a Beats who never grew up and never became a better person. But who needs insight?
“ Lol he’s attempting the birdbox challenge”
*insert Family Guy skit here*
“ hat stupid ass face reveal did nothing as the damage was done”
They say as most of the fandom did a 180 on how they view his character and gave him more justification for his actions than “Monty” Adam ever had.
“ he fandom - primarily BMBLB, and CRWBY sing of his death (“Ding-dong the bitch is dead!”)”
Which considering he was meant to be hated is a GOOD thing.
“ with the BMBLB fandom using his death as major evidence of their ship becoming canon”
Basically ‘wah wah wah make MY otp canon”
“ Also, his death caused such dissonance in the fandom that shit hit the fan in all kinds of ways”
all kinds being two ways: accepting it and throwing a fit because you didn’t get your way. Also inadvertently justifying wasps being assholes because they did the same thing during Volumes 4 and 5.
“ t to mention his death started the slow deterioration of RT - embodying the spite element that Blake attributed him, probably because he was pissed at CRWBY to the point where his hatred manifested as a curse - causing their various injustices against their employees to come out and be heavily criticized as a result (No, seriously, RT is visibly crumbling shortly after his demise).”
And said curse infected many of his fans where they all became monsters after his death like say, using the suffering of others AND THE DEAD *cough* MONTY *cough* all over a fictional character that didn’t even exist because as I have shown Adam is completely consistent with his characterization from the Black Trailer to his death. Something I am certain OP knows deep down because half way through this point they completely abandon any attempt at actually proving what they are saying to instead spout a bunch of memes in a vain attempt to appeal to people’s confirmation bias because they can’t actually make an argument to prove Adam had changed AT ALL, especially since their obsessive behavior, attempt at creating an abusive/parasitic relationship with RT and their own childishness has all but prove Adam is in no way unrealistic as they act like him except with NO justification whatsoever.
But sure, scream loud enough and people will think you’re right. That hasn’t BACKFIRED before.
22 notes · View notes
afoolforatook · 4 years
Text
Farley addresses shipping discourse for literally the first time in their life, because I care about you guys and hate seeing negativity within the community.
This is a post I’m really hesitant to make, regarding some ship discourse I’ve seen recently. And I am only making it cause it literally has been making me feel ill thinking about it so much and I just need to get it out.
It’s really disheartening to see, especially at the end of this week of such positivity, people I follow and really enjoy following (enjoy their content and 90% of what they say) being outright negative regarding other ships. And I don’t mean from like a anti-multishipping point, but calling other ships/shippers problematic.
Especially when those comments are put on their content, that I want to share, but don’t feel comfortable sharing the comment.
Like I’m 100% for speaking your mind on your own blog, and for saying what you want to, attached to your own work. And I totally understand not liking certain ships, and even thinking certain ships are problematic. Most of the posts I’m referring to here I actually agree with, as far as whether or not I support the ship/want to see that content. I just can’t stand the negativity.
It’s one thing if it’s a ship that is obviously problematic: an adult and a minor, a survivor and their abuser, incest (though I still hate seeing outright negativity thrown around over fictional ships, but I’m extremely and possibly overly adverse to negativity in most circumstances, so it may be my issue).
But when it comes to consenting adult ships that might have some grey areas, can we please just not act like anyone who disagrees with us is morally corrupt?? Don’t like what you don’t like, block what you need to block, unfollow who you need to unfollow, but don’t just be needlessly antagonistic? 
Make a post about why you feel that way, but does it have to be added onto art/writing that isn’t directly about that issue? And, while I haven’t actually seen anyone do this in this case I know people do it sometimes, don’t post it in the tag, and especially not during a ship week. (hell I’ve seen enough posts shitting on fair gamers in the fg tag to know people still do this, even if the exact people I’ve seen haven’t) 
Like I hate even posting this because, like I said, some of this I’m seeing from people I follow, maybe even some mutuals, and I know they aren’t, and would never try to say they were, bad people, and I’m not trying to attack them. And I worry this will piss people off. And i’m not even talking about how people handle CRWBY interactions, because there is plenty there that makes me uncomfortable or that I don’t agree with how people handle things, but I still support them. I’m just talking about how we treat each other, how we handle differences within our own community. 
But just. Is it that hard or wrong to ask people to be cognizant that just because someone ships something you have an issue with, it doesn’t mean they’re a bad person or deserve to be shamed?
I think it’s especially bothering me because I’ve seen people I follow on both sides of a ship, which means they’re both also fair gamers, and I hate the idea that people who are part of such a hurt and supportive community could then also hurt each other over another ship.
I feel like I want to be more specific but I really truly don���t want to call anyone out, and really, though I have specific examples I’ve seen recently, it’s not just one ship or one person or one kind of post. It’s just in general.
I know I am hyper sensitive to discourse and negativity. I know that means that I do not always have good or reasonable reactions to valid discourse. But I really try to see every side, to be open minded and understanding.
But we curate what we interact with. If you don’t like something, if something triggers you or just bothers you enough that you don’t want to have to see it, curate your experience. Block, unfollow, blacklist tags. If someone you like posts some ship content you don’t like, ask them to tag it if they don’t already.
And maybe I’m being overly sensitive here and unreasonable about certain things. I can acknowledge that that’s not an insane possibility. But in that case, know that if I like something of yours but don’t share it, and it has some kind of negative comment attached, that’s probably why. Even if I might agree with that negative comment to an extent. You have every right to say it, and to add it to your own work, but as much as I may like your work, I don’t necessarily want to spread that sentiment/atmosphere.
The last thing I want is to alienate people within an already vulnerable and alienated community.
Fairgame is the first thing that has made me want to be active within a fandom community in years. And I’m very thankful for how positive and receptive the community has been towards me. And I know people are still hurt and angry and opinionated and have every right to be.
But seeing negativity and (in my opinion) needless shipping discourse really bothers me and makes me hesitant to be as involved. It makes me paranoid about who to follow or not follow because I worry about accidentally choosing sides/promoting discourse. It makes me worry that people I follow or who follow me will get upset with me over something I ship. 
It makes me even second guess myself and worry that maybe I am problematic for liking ironqrow or hummingbird, or the idea that Qrow is Ruby’s dad. (or if I reblog something that I don’t necessarily ship but like the art/content) All of which I have specific circumstances and feelings and opinions around and don’t just blanket support, and I hate the idea of someone writing me off just because they see the surface fact that I like it.
I get why people don’t like those ships or theories, but having different opinions on them doesn’t mean we’re diametrically opposed. It’s like that post recently about how liking theories or ships doesn’t mean you necessarily want them to be canon, or think that the current canon dynamic is healthy, but that the potential for interesting story is there.
I don’t know if this is even coherent enough or makes a clear point. I just. We’re all having a really hard time right now, on so many different fronts. And the least we can do is try our best to be kind to each other, even when we have little differences in opinion (again I’m talking about specific, fandom related, grey area, stuff. Not that bullshit political kind of narrative, y’all know that).
Give each other the benefit of the doubt as much as you can. Don’t write someone off just because they support a ship you don’t. Or if you need to write them off for that, do so, but just do that then, don’t be antagonistic to someone who just simply posts something you don’t like. (Again this is different than confronting someone who is overly antagonistic to others, or blatantly problematic, which even then is a hard line to walk between standing up against something wrong and being mean. I’m also not saying I’ve seen anyone specifically doing this, but with what I have seen I’m sure it’s happening).
Especially within a community that has so many minors within it. That’s something I’m constantly aware of: that there’s a good chance the people I see posting negative content or who could feel targeted by such content, are kids. And especially right now, kids who are under an immense amount of stress and need a place to get away, where they don’t have to worry about constantly fielding discourse from within a community they look for support in.
I don’t know whether to put this in the fair game tag or not. If I do, it’s because everything I’ve seen has been from people within the fair game community.
And if I’m wrong about something here please let me know, I’m fine to talk about things (though also know that I might get overwhelmed easily at any perceived conflict and may take my time to reply). But please be conscious of how you do so, be polite. I’m genuinely not writing this towards any one person or about one ship, the only reason I’m posting it at all is specifically because I’ve seen it over multiple blogs and multiple topics.
1 note · View note
knightofbalance-13 · 7 years
Text
AKA Insult The Audience and Characters While Wasting Time
http://delvindeep.tumblr.com/post/164570714739/ive-been-thinking-about-the-world-of-remnant
i’ve been thinking about the world of remnant series and how they could have implemented that worldbuilding into the series proper. here’s a few ideas
Which are all just the same version of “one guy asks another guy for exposition” same as literally every other show in existence which WOR is able to subvert and avoid the pitfalls of the ordinary exposition.
dust: the story literally opens in a dust shop. show ruby buying some, having a chat with the shop owner. “is this for raw use, miss, or ammunition?” “yeah, it’s for my baby.” “your baby?” “the scythe” etc. if you actually need us to know the history of its use and how humanity doesn’t know where it came from, give it to us in one of port’s lectures. we don’t have to hear the whole thing; just a couple of key lines, then it fades into background noise as jaune starts hitting on weiss again or some shit because that’s apparently more important than establishing your lore
Except why would Port or anyone be teaching them such basic elements of dust when they are already in an advanced school for this sort of thing and thus would have already had this drilled into their skulls years ago? That’s insulting to the characters for thinking hey are that stupid and insulting to the audience for believing we wouldn’t catch onto that. Also, i guess you’re fine with a shit ton of flaws in the animation since they had to waste time getting lines for the teachers and the students as well as animating all of that. Unless you want to nix a fight scene or a plot point because RWBY is already stretched for time as it is.
kingdoms: did we even need this one? the show already tells us there are four kingdoms called atlas, mistral, vacuo and vale, that atlas is militaristic, that huntsmen academies train huntsmen (no shit) and that life outside the borders is dangerous. see, they know how to do it already!
Except we don’t know WHY Atlas is built that way, we know nothing about Mistral Vale of Vacuo, we don’t know why their actions of treating Huntsmen like soldiers is so looked down upon and why peopel are so on edge with them. That excludes a lot of the tiny details that really enrich the lore such as Atlas having risen up from the snow to become the new captial of the Kingdom or how Vacuo has a different morality than the other two kingdoms due to the harshness of their area. COngrats, you wasted time and money for a much worse, more boring, more drap version of what we already got.
grimm: instead of starting with the dust shop scene, start with some redshirt nomads. one complains that he doesn’t feel safe travelling at night, another makes fun of him, they start arguing, someone else steps in and tells them to shut up because fear and anger will draw the grimm, which it does. if it’s important to know that they don’t attack animals, show some animals, which the grimm ignore after killing all the humans. the shit about older grimm getting smarter is already in the show, the shit about them evaporating when they die is in the show, and the shit it being impossible to keep them captive is contradicted by the show
Okay then, fork over about a thousand dollars to cover the cost of the voice acting and animation. or better yet, do it yourself so that the CRWBY don’t have to stretch themselves out even further. Oh, and listen as the fans complain on and on about there being no new episodes or anything because there is no WOR to tide them over, thus weakening their suspension of disbelief, thus forcing you to maker more detailed lore, thus more time, more gaps, more annoyance and so on until the show is dead.
aura: this is all in the show already. pyrrha gives jaune a hamfisted exposition dump about aura that he shouldn’t need.
Except what exactly it is, what it does, what Sembelnces are, the types of Sembelnces asd well as build up for Salem.
vytal festival: work the origins of the festival into ozpin’s speech instead of that stupid attempt at explaining the colour names
The listen as people bitch on and on about the color names as well as the info they will inevitably forget about since that means they’ll get it a whole yera before needed. Also, that takes longer so cough up more money or time or have a shitter product.
huntsmen: nothing of substance here that we didn’t already know
Except that Huntsmen aren’t the noible heroes that we see which helps ease people into the tonal shift of Volume 3 as well as humanizing the product.
ccts: look, let’s be honest. the only reason this is here is to explain why cinder’s plan is going to work. like, was there even the slightest question about what was going to happen when they ended the episode with “if one tower goes down then they all do”
the point is, it shouldn’t be so difficult to hint at what the villain is up to that you have to shove it into a side series. just stop having your villain be vague as fuck about everything for the sake of cultivating mystique
Then spend an entire season having the villain detail every single step of their plan with the complexities and all the twists and see if there are still people around. Also, that doesn’t explain why the CCT is so important so you still have to do that so fork over more money or time.
four maidens: this is more of a standalone short than supplemental infodumping, so i dunno if it should count. not that it would matter anyway because the maidens subplot already comes out of fucking nowhere
So9 impliment it into the story which already has fast pace for no reason, kill the pacing and the mood as well as remove the story book element about them. Also, personally work on the series to make up for the week of time they lost because there is nothing there to fill the gap, fork over the money to cover up the removal or personally take responsibility for it.
vale: mostly boring geographical waffle that is unlikely to ever be important. no elegant way to work it into the show, but on the other hand, you don’t need to
Thus the world feels flatter and emptier with no explanation for what happened when teh series gave the tone of doing so, thus losing audience interest and something that made the series unique.
the other kingdoms: we know everyone’s headed to mistral. presumably they’ll be spending some time there. show us the culture when they arrive. are we ever gonna visit the other two? if so, do the same for them. if not, it doesn’t matter much
Wow, you must have some deep pockets or as much free time as possible to be willing to foot the bill for all of this new footage and audio and voice lines and brainstorming and editing that this would all entail. Surely you wouldn’t ask a studio to bankrupt themselves just to do stuff you’d never ask of any other show right?
between kingdoms: it’s in the show! grimm running wild outside the kingdoms is in the show! bandit attacks are in the show! grimm moving in afterwards is in the show! it’s all there already!
Except the specifics of the grimm attacks, why people move outside pof the kingdoms, why there are bandits, how they get supplies and their interactions with the Grimm.
faunus: you know when oobleck is talking about the faunus war? you know when he stops for a minute to ask if any faunus have been discriminated against, and velvet raises her hand, and he’s like “oh, that sucks. anyway, back to what i was talking about”? you know how that part was a total waste of time? cut it. talk some more about the origin of the human-faunus conflict before everyone starts going on about night vision. you could even work some development for blake in there. oobleck asks if anyone knows how and when faunus exploitation began, and blake gives a long, bitter, opinionated answer
Ah yes, because one minute of dialogue to segway into a plotline can  be cut out and around ten minutes of exposition about fanaus history, biology and interactions with the humans can be shoved into that space. Except no, it can’t be so that’s more money and/or time you must be willing to give up to add in what no one asked for. As well as teh all teh angry fans who will yell at you for thinking they were stupid enough to think the characters didn’t know that as well as making all the characters into people with the memory of a fruit fly.
schnee dust company: i feel like this could have been a character moment for weiss. she probably never met nicholas. the only sdc she’s lived with is the one run by jacques. finding out that it was once an honest business run by a good, brave man could be a big turning point for her. “i want to be out there overseeing expeditions like granddad did. i want to change this company back to what it was.” and bam. now being a hunter isn’t just about annoying daddy anymore
Except that why she would even fight against her father in the first place, why she would consider the schhnee name noble at all or how she would miss all this, make the plot hole with her mother even fucking bigger than before, makes Weiss look like an idiot for not looking into her family’s past and, again, kills her motivation so we have a walking contradiction in the show as a main character.
And that’s not even getting into how there are some people who PREFER WOR over ordinary exposition.and thus changing that pisses them off as well as kills the pacing of RWBY. Thus changing something for an, at bets, equal result as before.
Yeah great job on the suggestion.
21 notes · View notes