Tumgik
#online fraud complaint
saivvyinfotech · 1 year
Link
0 notes
Text
Cyber Crime Complaint Kaise Kare
Tumblr media
That any crime which is committed using computer, internet or any other technology comes under the category of cyber crime. If any cyber crime happens to you, then you do not need to go to the police station to report it. You can go online. You can report it on the cyber crime portal, for example, if someone is threatening you online, someone has shared your photos, a fake profile has been created in your name or there has been a financial fraud with you, someone has taken money from your bank. If your debit card has been stolen or your credit card has been borrowed and money has been withdrawn from it, this has been done to you in the name of job, then you can report all these on the online cyber crime portal.
In this video I am going to show you the complete process of filing a report on cyber crime portal so let's start A [Music] To report any cyber crime you have to come to cybercrime.gov.in if you are with us If a financial cyber crime has taken place and you want to do immediate reporting, then you can also report by calling the helpline number 1930. If you call the office below, you will get some examples of how cyber crime can be committed. If you click on View More, then you will see all the details. Exams will come to them, now Hindus can think in English, so I am talking to the bank, it became black on you that I can tell you the lottery number, madam, told the seats for half an hour, the bank will touch the nifty, the offer is this.
Also read- bank account freeze by telanagana
That you will have to pay Rs 20000. You can download these audio files from here and can also share them to make the public aware. On this portal you will get two options, if any crime has happened against a woman or child and you want to know about it. If you have to report then also tell your name, otherwise you can report from here. To report any other cyber crime, you will click on Report Other Cyber Crime. Whatever you complete should be correct, if it is found wrong then for this You will be labeled I Accept. If you are visiting this portal for the first time then you will click on Click Here for User.
In this you will use your state, in this you will enter your email ID, enter mobile number here, click on Get OTP, OTP will be sent to the mobile number, enter the TP here, fill this chapter and submit, now to complete your profile. You have to fill some details like you will select the title, enter your name, use date of birth, select gender, enter your father's or mother's name, click on your present address below, after this, your Seven Continue profile will be updated. You can complain from here, first you will have to field the complete details of the incident that happened to you, in this you will choose the category of complaint and which type you have to complain.
Also Read- bank account freeze
For example, if it is time related to online and social media, then you will choose this option. If online financial fraud has happened to you, then you will choose this option. Whatever crime has happened to you, whatever category it falls in, you will choose it from here. After this, you do not have to choose all the categories here, like if any online job is mature then you will choose this option. You will put the date and timing of the incident here, on which date this crime happened to you. If If you are reporting late then you will do this and here you will give a reason why you are reporting late and if you are reporting on time then you will ignore this. Where has this update happened to you?
You will select it here like on Facebook, on Instagram, on Twitter, on WhatsApp, on any website, on YouTube, on Telegram, on email, on any other place, you will select it here, this crime has also been committed through this medium, they will select it here. And here you will get its details, like if someone has sent you a threatening e-mail, then you will enter the email ID from which the threat has been sent to you, friend, you will take a screenshot of it and whatever evidence you have. For example, you will upload any photo, audio or video file here, after uploading a document, you will click on add, it will come here, similarly you can add more here, after this you will also get the details of the incident here. I have to do what happened to you
Also Read - bank account freeze by gandhi nagar cyber crime
And how it happened will be written in details here and click on save. After this you will have to fill in the details of the person i.e. the person whom you suspect has committed a crime with you, then whatever information you have about him will be filled here. For example, if you know its name, then you will put the name here, after that you will use this code like if you know its bank account number, driving license address, email address, mobile number, PAN card, voter ID card or whatever you know. If the suspect is more than one, then you will select the email and enter his email ID here. Click on add, then it will be added. If there is more than one suspect, then you can spread it from the other one. You will enter your name here, you will get this juice, you will enter your ID number.
And we will add it. If you have any photo of the pack, then you will choose the photo here and upload it. If you also know the address of the pack, then you will use it and fill its address here, but if you do not know the address. So we will do no and click on save, after this here you will have to fill the details of the victim, in this you will upload any ID proof of the victim, below you have to enter the address of the victim, after this the seventh review, the complete application will appear in front of you, you will complete it correctly. We will check if everything is absolutely correct then you will agree and click on submit confirmation, your complaint will be registered and friend you will get this number in the technology, it is also sent to your email ID and mobile number.
Below you will get the option to download PDF, by clicking on it you will download your report here in PDF format. After this, your report will be sent to whatever police station is located at your address, where an officer will investigate the crime related to you. We will investigate what has happened, your name and mobile number will also be SMSed to you. To check the status of your report at any time, you will come to this portal and click on Track Your Complaint. In this you will enter the acknowledgment number and click on Get OTP. Pass OTP will be sent. If you enter OTP here and submit, then the status of your complaint will appear in front of you and if cyber crime has happened with you, then in this way you can report cyber crime online.
0 notes
navyugshaktinews · 5 days
Text
'मेरे साथ धोखा हुआ...' शख्स ने ऑनलाइन ऑर्डर किया 1 लाख का नया लैपटॉप, बदले में जो मिला, देखकर उड़ गए होश
नई दिल्ली. ऑनलाइन शॉपिंग हमारे जीवन का अभिन्न हिस���सा बन गई है लेकिन इसकी विश्वसनीयता भी धीरे धीरे कम होती जा रही है. इसकी सबसे बड़ी वजह यूजर्स को सही प्रोडक्ट ना देना और उनके साथ आए दिन हो रही ठगी है. ओरिजनल प्रोडक्ट के नाम पर यूज किया हुए सामान की डिलीवरी की शिकायत पर सोशल मीडिया पर आए दिन देखने को मिलती हैं. इसी तरह का एक मामला सामने आया है, जिसमें कस्टमर ने अमेज़न पर आरोप लगाए हैं. दरअसल, रोहन…
View On WordPress
0 notes
legalmagnifier · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
Does Consumer Complaint Service Helpline Work In Mumbai
While the consumer complaint service helpline is a valuable resource, it often falls short when it comes to providing comprehensive legal support.
0 notes
hw4computers · 1 year
Text
How to Online Fraud (Scam) Money Recovery in India
Recovering money lost in online fraud can be a difficult process, but there are steps you can take to try to get your money back. Here are some options for online fraud money recovery in India Contact the Bank or Payment Provider If you made a payment through a bank or payment provider, contact them immediately to report the fraud and request a chargeback or reversal of the payment. Provide them…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
bank fraud | bank frauds in india | cyber crime | cyber crime complaint | MUMBAI | online fraud | Online Bank Fraud
Now fraud in the name of KYC, cheating of lakhs of rupees from 40 people including TV actors in Mumbai Online Bank Fraud News: TV actress Shweta Memon was also among the 40 victims who complained of alleged fraud. In his complaint, Memon said that last Thursday he had clicked on a link in a fake text message, believing it to be from his bank. Highlights 1. At least 40 private bank customers were…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Cyber Crime Complaint Online in India
Tumblr media
What is cyber fraud?
Cyber fraud is any type of fraudulent activity that takes place online. This can include anything from consumer complaints and identity theft to phishing schemes and credit card fraud. Cyber fraud is a growing problem as more and more people conduct business and personal transactions online.
There are a few things you can do to protect yourself from cyber fraud. First, be aware of the most common types of fraud. This will help you to be on the lookout for suspicious activity. Second, make sure you have strong security measures in place on your computer and other devices. This includes things like antivirus software and a firewall. Finally, never give out personal or financial information online unless you are absolutely sure it is safe to do so.
If you think you may have been a victim of cyber fraud, the first thing you should do is contact your bank or credit card company. They will be able to help you determine if there has been any unauthorized activity on your account. You should also file a report with the Federal Trade Commission. This will help to create a paper trail and may help to catch the person responsible for the fraud.
Types of cyber fraud
There are a variety of different types of cyber fraud, and it is important to be aware of them. Here are some of the most common:
1. Phishing Scams
Phishing scams are one of the most common types of cyber fraud. This is where criminals send out emails or texts pretending to be from a legitimate company or organization. They will try to trick you into clicking on a link or giving them personal information. Phishing scams can be very sophisticated and can be very difficult to spot.
2. Identity Theft
Identity theft is another common type of cyber fraud. This is where criminals steal your personal information, such as your name, address, date of birth, or social security number. They can then use this information to open new accounts, or to commit other types of fraud.
3. Fake Websites
Another type of cyber fraud is creating fake websites. This is where criminals create a website that looks like a legitimate website, but is actually a fake. They will often use these websites to phish for personal information or to install malware.
4. Malware
Malware is a type of software that is designed to harm your computer. It can be used to steal personal information, or to take control of your computer. Malware can be installed on your computer without your knowledge, and can be very difficult to remove What is cyber fraud?
Cyber fraud is any type of fraudulent activity that takes place online. This can include anything from consumer complaints and identity theft to phishing schemes and credit card fraud. Cyber fraud is a growing problem as more and more people conduct business and personal transactions online.
Process of Cyber Fraud Complaints?
If you've been a victim of cyber fraud, you know how frustrating it can be. You may feel like you're never going to get your money back, or that the process is just too complicated. But there are steps you can take to file a cyber-fraud complaint and get your money back.
The first step is to contact the company where you made the purchase. If you used a credit card, you can also dispute the charges with your credit card company. They may be able to help you get your money back.
Next, you'll need to file a police report. This is important because it will give law enforcement a record of the crime. Be sure to include as much detail as possible, including the date, time, and amount of money involved.
Then, you can file a complaint with NCDRC. The NCDRC keeps track of complaints about fraud and scams, and they can help you get your money back.
Filing a complaint may seem like a lot of work, but it's important to do if you've been the victim of cyber fraud. By taking these steps, you can help law enforcement catch the criminals and get your money back.
How Consumer Complaints Online Help?
Do you have a problem with a purchase you made online? Or are you the victim of cyber fraud? Either way, consumer complaints online can help you get your claim.
When you make a purchase online, you are entitled to a certain level of protection. If something goes wrong, you can file a complaint with the merchant. But what if the merchant doesn't respond? Or what if you're the victim of cyber fraud?
In either case, NCDRC. The NCDRC is an agency that helps consumers get their claims.
When you file a complaint with the NCDRC, it will investigate the matter and try to resolve it. If the NCDRC finds that the merchant has violated the law, it can take enforcement action against the merchant.
The NCDRC can also help you get your money back. If you've been the victim of cyber fraud, the NCDRC can help you get your money back from your bank or credit card company.
So if you have a problem with a purchase you made online, or if you've been the victim of cyber fraud, consumer complaints online can help you get your claim.
0 notes
hungwy · 1 year
Text
Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, an indictment and a complaint were unsealed charging Russian nationals Anton Napolsky and Valeriia Ermakova with criminal copyright infringement, wire fraud and money laundering for operating Z-Library, an online e-book piracy website. The pair was arrested on November 3, 2022 in Cordoba, Argentina at the request of the United States. At the same time, Z-Library’s network of online domains was also taken offline and seized by the U.S. government, pursuant to a court order that was also unsealed today.
687 notes · View notes
collapsedsquid · 2 months
Text
In 2022, federal prosecutors and the US Securities and Exchange Commission brought securities fraud charges against a group of people who allegedly did pump and dumps using Twitter, Discord and a podcast. We talked about the case at the time. It was typically silly: The defendants went by online nicknames like “MrZackMorris” and “Mystic Mac” and “The Stock Sniper,” the podcast was titled “Pennies: Going in Raw,” the SEC complaint had pictures of a Lamborghini, and the defendants were publicly saying things like “I’ll never get sick of pumping … money into my followers bank accounts. LETS ALL GET RICH!” while they were privately saying things like “We’re robbing f*cking idiots of their money.” So I couldn’t not write about it. But it was kind of boring, really, just the most garden-variety pump and dump imaginable. “Pretty straightforward fraud,” I called it. “I don’t know why people keep falling for it,” I wrote. There was nothing particularly novel or interesting about this case except I guess the names. But yesterday a federal judge in Texas dismissed the criminal charges against MrZackMorris and friends in an absolutely wild opinion ruling that, in fact, a pump and dump is not securities fraud, because the people who bought the stock didn’t buy it from the pumpers
Decided to check out the twitter account of one of the guys to see if I found him exulting, no tweets since December 2022 but he does have an amusing header:
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
beardedmrbean · 10 months
Text
Silverman, along with authors Christopher Golden and Richard Kadrey, allege that OpenAI and Meta’s respective artificial intelligence-backed language models were trained on illegally-acquired datasets containing the authors’ works, according to the suit.
The complaints state that ChatGPT and Meta’s LLaMA honed their skills using “shadow library” websites like Bibliotik, Library Genesis and Z-Library, among others, which are illegal given that most of the material uploaded on these sites is protected by authors’ rights to the intellectual property over their works.
When asked to create a dataset, ChatGPT reportedly produced a list of titles from these illegal online libraries.
“The books aggregated by these websites have also been available in bulk via torrent systems,” says the proposed class-action suit against OpenAI, which was filed in San Francisco federal court on Friday along with another suit against Facebook parent Meta Platforms.
Exhibits included with the suit show ChatGPT’s response when asked to summarize books by Silverman, Golden and Kadrey.
The first example shows the AI bot’s summary of Silverman’s memoir, The Bedwetter; then Golden’s award-winning novel Ararat; and finally Kadrey’s Sandman Slim.
The suit says ChatGPT’s synopses of the titles fails to “reproduce any of the copyright management information Plaintiffs included with their published works” despite generating “very accurate summaries.”
This “means that ChatGPT retains knowledge of particular works in the training dataset and is able to output similar textual content,” it added.
The authors’ suit against Meta also points to the allegedly illicit sites used to train LLaMA, the ChatGPT competitor the Mark Zuckerberg-owned company launched in February.
AI models are all trained using large sets of data and algorithms. One of the datasets LLaMA uses to get smarter is called The Pile, and was assembled by nonprofit AI research group EleutherAI.
Silverman, Goldman and Kadrey’s suit points to a paper published by EleutherAI that details how one of its datasets, called Books3, was “derived from a copy of the contents of the Bibliotik private tracker.”
Bibliotik — one of the handful of “shadow libraries” named in the lawsuit — are “flagrantly illegal,” the court documents said.
The authors say in both claims that they “did not consent to the use of their copyrighted books as training material” for either of the AI models, claiming OpenAI and Meta therefore violated six counts of copyright laws, including negligence, unjust enrichment and unfair competition.
Although the suit says that the damage “cannot be fully compensated or measured in money,” the plaintiffs are looking for statutory damages, restitution of profits and more.
The authors’ legal counsel did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
The Post has also reached out to OpenAI and Meta for comment.
The lawyers representing the three authors — Joseph Saveri and Matthew Butterick — are involved in multiple suits involving authors and AI models, according to their LLMlitigation website.
In 2022, they filed a suit against OpenAI’s GitHub Copilot — which turns natural language into code and was acquired by Microsoft for $7.5 billion in 2018 — claiming that it violates privacy, unjust enrichment and unfair competition laws, and also commits fraud, among other things.
Saveri and Butterick also filed a complaint earlier this year challenging AI image generator Stable Diffusion, and have represented a slew of other book authors in class-action litigation against AI tech.
15 notes · View notes
sunny12th · 6 days
Text
I think I'm gonna make a sideblog to use as a diary or maybe I'll start using this one as a diary again. It's silly but I have a hard time getting my thoughts down when I know people, whose opinions I do actually care about, will see them. I like my mutuals a lot but I dont always want yall to see my insides written out. or maybe I'll use this blog as a diary bc, at the end of the day, I need to feel better about being perceived and less like a fraud when I try to describe how I'm doing to anybody at all - even to online ppl I've never met. There's no real reason for my thoughts to tangle up just bc a mutual or random might like a post about my personal life. There's no real consequences that can come from talking about myself beyond shallow complaints about how I'm doing on tumblr dot com. and yet!!!
5 notes · View notes
legalmagnifier · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
What Is The Right To A Refund Under The Consumer Protection Act?
The right to a refund is a vital component of consumer protection and of consumer complaint court in Mumbai; ensuring that consumers are not left bearing the financial burden of defective products, subpar services, or unfair trade practices.
0 notes
remesearch · 6 months
Text
Serial Fraudster: Gaurav Srivastava has been accused, and convicted, of fraud and misrepresentation multiple times in the US.
Convicted to pay USD 80,000 in 2019 and nearly USD 1 million in 2014, over the past few years, Gaurav has repeatedly demonstrated that he is a con artist.
Tumblr media
Gaurav Srivastava, who has built a reputation of an honest and philanthropic businessman related to the CIA, has been revealed as a fraudster by online US legal data. Between 2019 and 2014, Gaurav and several of his family members have faced accusations and convictions multiple times in the US for fraud and misrepresentation, exposing highly questionable intentions behind their business dealings.
In 2019, Gaurav Srivastava was convicted by a Court order to pay USD 80,000 after failing to fulfil a payment obligation of USD 82,088 to the Keck Hospital in Los Angeles for medical services provided to his father, Jaswant Srivastava. Despite having issued checks from his company Veecon Biotech LLC (Delaware, US), Gaurav had later halted the payments. (Case No. 19STCV03981: https://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?casetype=civil)
Below is an excerpt from the legal documents of the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County.
‘Gaurav Srivastava as the President of the Defendant company provided Plaintiff's Assignor with a check dated 05/24/18 in the amount of $14,850.00 made payable to Keck Medical Center USC and another check dated 05/24/18 in the amount of $67,238.00 made payable to Keck Medical Center USC for a total of $82,088.00 to pay for his father's medical services. Both checks were to be drawn from Defender company. The Defendant's President stopped payment on the checks and the balance remains unpaid’.
Gaurav Srivastava and his brother Pankaj Srivastava were also convicted by a Court order to pay nearly USD 1 million in 2014, when Nixon Peabody LLP (US) initiated legal proceedings against them and their company Veecon Group. They had breached an agreement made in 2013 by failing to honour invoices totalling USD 155,329 for legal services provided by Nixon Peabody LLP. As representatives of Veecon Group, Gaurav and Pankaj Srivastava were held accountable for the outstanding debt to Nixon Peabody LLP and were ordered to pay. (Case No. BC548034: https://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?casetype=civil)
Below is an excerpt from the legal documents of the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County.
‘In early October 2013, in an effort to obtain Nixon Peabody's forbearance and willingness to continue as counsel, Gaurav Srivastava provided Nixon Peabody a personal check dated October 4, 2013 in the amount of $50,000.00. The check was returned for lack of sufficient funds. Later in October 2013, Gaurav Srivastava promised full payment by October 21, 2013. To date, no such payment, or for that matter, any payment has been received by Nixon Peabody’.
In 2017, Gaurav Srivastava was accused of fraud and breach of contract. Between 2015 and 2016, Veecon Biotech, under Gaurav Srivastava's leadership, entered into agreements with the plaintiffs, falsely claiming they held licenses to market saliva diagnostics technologies and appointing them as sales representatives. Gaurav Srivastava went further, making deceptive statements regarding Dr. David Wong's association with Veecon Biotech. If the plaintiffs withdrew their complaints after reaching settlements in October 2020, the Superior Court of California rejected these settlements, leaving the case unresolved. (Case no. BC648883: https://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?casetype=civil)
In 2019, a certain Patricia Riordan Torrey also initiated a legal case against Gaurav Srivastava, his company Veecon Biotech LLC, and his wife Sharon Srivastava as defendants. However, no additional information regarding the details or progression of the case could be located. Whilst Gaurav Srivastava and his wife Sharon Srivastava accused a certain Jill Small of defamation and of having 'intentionally interfered with a business deal that would have netted Plaintiff (Gaurav and Sharon Srivastava) approximately $40,000,000 in profit, and then tried to extort $500,000', the motion to seal the entire court file was denied in December 2022 because of a lack of specificity. (Case no. 21STCV28536: https://trellis.law/ruling/21stcv28536/gaurav-srivastava-vs-jill-small/20221208729619)
4 notes · View notes
Text
This day in history
Tumblr media
I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me in TUCSON (Mar 9-10), then San Francisco (Mar 13), Anaheim, and more!
Tumblr media
#20yrsago The Orkut Song https://web.archive.org/web/20050910045938/http://sims.berkeley.edu/~dmb/orkut/orkutworld.mp3
#15yrsago Doctors force patients to sign gag orders forbidding online reviews https://www.montereyherald.com/2009/03/04/doctors-using-patient-waivers-to-curb-negative-online-reviews/
#10yrsago Edward Snowden to speak at SXSW https://schedule.sxsw.com/2014/events/event_IAP27783
#10yrsago Delhi police lost password for complaints portal in 2006, haven’t checked it since https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/vigilance-complaints-pile-up-as-delhi-police-doesnt-know-password/
#5yrsago London councils plan to slash benefit payments with an “anti-fraud” system known to have a 20% failure rate https://news.sky.com/story/thousands-face-incorrect-benefit-cuts-from-automated-fraud-detector-11651031
#5yrsago History is made: petition opposing the EU’s #Article13 internet censorship plan draws more signatures than any petition in human history https://www.change.org/p/european-parliament-stop-the-censorship-machinery-save-the-internet
#5yrsago The People’s Republic of Walmart: how late-stage capitalism gives way to early-stage fully automated luxury communism https://memex.craphound.com/2019/03/05/the-peoples-republic-of-walmart-how-late-stage-capitalism-gives-way-to-early-stage-fully-automated-luxury-communism/
#5yrsago BATHDOOM: A Doom level based on a terrible bathroom remodel https://twitter.com/dietinghippo/status/1102153605899927556
#1yrago They’re still trying to ban cryptography https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/05/theyre-still-trying-to-ban-cryptography/
Tumblr media
Name your price for 18 of my DRM-free ebooks and support the Electronic Frontier Foundation with the Humble Cory Doctorow Bundle.
5 notes · View notes
theyearsnews · 4 months
Text
Conman Gaurav Srivastava caught lying to Google over corruption expose
A leading investigative journalism publication has accused Indian businessman Gaurav Kumar Srivastava of lying to Google in order to de-index a story that exposed him as a conman and fraudster who abused the American secret service’s name to defraud a Dutch oil trader.
Project Brazen, which describes itself as the ultimate destination for fearless journalism, published a detailed story revealing how Gaurav Srivastava posed as an operative of Central Investigation Agency (CIA) to run international scams on several successful businessmen, including the Geneva-based Dutch oil trader Niels Troost.
Project Brazen is run by two respected former Wall Street Journal reporters Bradley Hope, a Pulitzer Prize winner, and Tom Wright, a Pulitzer Prize nominee.
It was revealed that Srivastava used a creative lie to complain to Google that the award-winning investigative journalism site had stolen the contents of story on Srivastava from another blog site. By using Google’s copyright policy to his advantage, Srivastava used a fraudulent technique to get the story on himself de-indexed by setting up a fake site and publishing the same content to claim it as his own – and then claimed copyright.
One of the reporters on the investigative story, Soobin Kim, tweeted:
“Our @WhaleHunting_ story was removed from Google's indexes due to copyright complaints. The complaints, saved on @lumendatabase, claim that we copied a backdated blog post, all content of which was lifted from our story. This is how fraudsters curate their online reputation.” https://x.com/soobinskim/status/1722747471888064525?s=20
Project Brazen from its official verified handle revealed the full scale of shocking fraud run on Google by Gaurav Srivastava to remove his expose from Google. In a thread, https://x.com/brazenFM/status/1722563387983351948?s=20 revealed:
“Our @WhaleHunting_  team recently reported on an alleged serial con man named Gaurav Srivastava, who masquerades as a CIA operative to swindle gullible business owners. Less than a month after the story ran, it disappeared from Google’s indexes. Instead, there was a note saying that search results had been removed due to complaints.
“On @lumendatabase, which collects online content removal notices, we found two complaints submitted to Google by someone named Sherrie Hagen, claiming that our story had infringed the copyright of a blog post on Tumblr.
“The post purporting to be the original had republished the text from the public preview of our story on @WhaleHunting_ , word for word. It was backdated to Oct 8th, two days before our date of publication, but the blog’s archive reveals that it was actually posted sometime in Nov.”
This US-based Sherrie Hagen in fact filed four copyright complaints to Google in November 2023, with one even claiming she was based in the UK. The Tumblr blog post that was apparently the original source of this information has now been altered to a completely different story – a move that leaves little trace of reports on Srivastava’s fraudulent activity.
“Our @WhaleHunting_ team reviewed multiple court documents, transcripts, correspondences and more to report and write this story, which the blog claims as its own in the complaints submitted to @Google to get it de-indexed. It even lifted the image made by @ProjectBrazen’s creative director – a photo of Gaurav Srivastava with swords in the background, inspired by the ceremonial swords he pretends to have received from various heads of state, when he actually bought them for himself.”
“When you google “Gaurav Srivastava”, you can only find fawning articles that he likely paid for calling him a “philanthropist” and a “loving parent.” This is a glaring example of how copyright laws are abused to launder the reputations of fraudsters, and bury damning information.”
In January 2023 Srivastava and his wife Sharon were the subjects of a flurry of articles that appeared on websites like LA Weekly and The Ritz Herald. Despite their heritage-sounding names, these sites are little more than content mills for paid promotions. The articles had vapid titles, including “Five Ways to Get Involved in the Local Los Angeles Community” and “6 Lessons to Teach Your Kids Gratitude”, which is often a sign of a search-engine optimisation (SEO) program used to manage – or manipulate – the subject’s online profile.
2 notes · View notes
Text
Revelations that the Trump Organization created a new company just as New York Attorney General Letitia James was about to file a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump and his business has drawn mockery online.
James' office sued Trump, the Trump Organization, senior management and other entities last month for what it alleged was "years of financial fraud to obtain a host of economic benefits." The former President is accused in the suit of falsely inflating his net worth by billions of dollars with the help of three of his children and senior Trump Organization executives in order to deceive lenders, insurers and tax authorities.
The New York Attorney General wrote in a court filing on Thursday that on the exact day the lawsuit was filed, September 21, the Trump Organization registered a new entity with the New York Secretary of State called "Trump Organization II LLC."
"That entity is a foreign corporation that was incorporated in Delaware. The Trump Organization has since refused to provide any assurance that it will not seek to move assets out of New York to evade legal accountability," James' office wrote in a release. The court filing notes that attorneys for Trump said the Trump Organization had not taken any steps to avoid potential consequences of the lawsuit.
"On the eve of this filing, counsel did offer to provide assurances and advance notice to address what were described as 'purported concerns,' but again offered no concrete mechanism to either effectuate or enforce that offer," the filing added.
The court filing's details about the almost identically named new company sparked parodies and ridicule on Twitter Thursday. One user, television producer Jonathan Goldman, wrote: "Trump Organization II is like the criminal putting on a fake mustache and thinking nobody recognizes him."
Tumblr media
In another tweet, Goldman shared a picture of Trump with a drawn-on mustache.
"BREAKING: Trump Organization II announces its new CEO," he captioned the photo.
Heather Cox Richardson, a professor, took aim at the timing of the creation of Trump Organization II.
Tumblr media
"I dunno, but creating 'Trump Organization II' on the same day that NYAG Letitia James sued the Trump Organization, and then continuing the same financial practices, sure sounds crimey," Richardson tweeted.
The New York Attorney General's court filing on Thursday was a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to block what it alleged was an "ongoing fraudulent scheme" by Trump and the Trump Organization.
Writer Mike Larsen's response to the revelation centered on the name of the new business.
Tumblr media
"On second thought, Trump Organization II might not have been the best name for the shell corporation," he tweeted.
The measures James' office is seeking to curtail the alleged continued fraud include blocking the Trump Organization from transferring any material assets to another entity without court approval, and requiring that all supporting and relevant materials are included in any new financial disclosures to banks and insurers. The office's release on Thursday also stated that James was seeking court permission to electronically serve Trump and his son, Eric Trump, "as both defendants and their counsels have refused to accept service of the complaints for almost a month."
A Trump Organization spokesperson told Newsweek in a statement back when the lawsuit was filed that it "has nothing to do with the facts or the law" and denounced it as political targeting of Trump and his company.
Newsweek has reached out to the Trump Organization for comment.
19 notes · View notes