#heidilore76
Text
Backyard Breeder
You were happy to share photos of kittens, earlier this year. In doing so, you said that your cat got pregnant AGAIN. Spay your cat, Heidi, you're irresponsible, we know this, but don't drag innocent babies into it.
0 notes
Text
Politics
You often allude or imply that you've been an Anarchist for a long time. Decades even. Well, this is simply not true.
In 2010, you were a Libertarian. Libertarians are not leftists, but rather "fiscally conservative, socially liberal," devil's advocate right wingers.
"Libertarian, conservative-leaning Christian" in 2011. That's more to the right.
In 2016, you were back to being a Libertarian with the typical EndTheFed and taxationistheft hashtags. Pay close attention to this as it will come up again.
The same year, you call yourself an "AnCap." So, you found out that you could attach a leftist school of though to a right wing ideology. Anarchy-Capitalism. Libertarian. Same difference, just one sounds cooler. This way, you could call yourself an Anarchist without technically lying.
In 2018, you called yourself a "radical leftist," which you have never, ever been. However, we suspect that you found out how big on mutual aid leftists are and decided to exploit the kindness of leftists and beg for money.
In 2019, you called yourself an "anarcho commie bitch."
In 2021, you were a "rabid leftist."
In 2022, you were an "Anarchist" again, which of course, you talked about, rarely, but never actually extolled any Anarchist ideals. Surface-level shit.
Around this same time, you started telling people about your Telegram channel and how they should reach out to you on it. Previously, you had older information on it, but this is relevant. You called yourself a "misanthropic nihilist." This is the first time nihilism ever came up and the only time it's ever been part of any of your self-descriptors.
On Facebook though, however, you called yourself an "Anarchist Communist" during this same time. Puzzling. You've never talked about any aspect of communism (in the anarchist sense) or collectivism.
Around this time, you nuked your Twitter account and made a new one. You also updated your Telegram bio.
What? Is that...are you endorsing Kanye West for president in 2024? Noted anti-semite and toxic person? Well, that's not very leftist of you, is it?
And one of your first tweets on this account is agreeing with Kanye, just a day or so after he was on Joe Rogan being really disgusting. Bizarre. Well, let's see what else your new Twitter account says about your politics. Let's start with who you're following on there:
Not a leftist in the bunch. In fact, it's all Christian, right-wing accounts and even a police account. Lots of leftists follow police accounts, but given the context and the other accounts/content we have seen from you, it's not likely for monitoring reasons. NARC.
After you got locked out of that account, you started another one; the one that has all the anti-semitism in it.
Imagine the lunacy of calling Jordan B Peterson a communist, and telling him that he needs therapy because he sounds like one? That's not very leftist either.
You also talked to your "boyfriend" about communists in a displeased way.
Reacting this way, without any criticism of communism from a leftist perspective just stinks of reactionary right-wing response. Try harder.
So, you then got locked out of this account and started your most recent known one. From the beginning, you were shilling for Russia, which is a weird thing to do if you're actually leftist.
Oh! We are back to calling ourselves an Anarchist:
An "anarchist" who follows pro-russia accounts? If anything, an anarchist would stand with the Ukrainians fighting an invasion on their own soil, right? Or better yet, an anarchist wouldn't take sides.
Once you gained some followers though, you dropped all political identifiers from your Twitter bio. I wonder why you'd do that.
Then, you deleted this account due to "stalking," but you updated your Telegram bio again.
What? "End the Fed?" Again? So we are back to an AnCap/Libertarian vibe? Or, did that never go away? You've been right-leaning this whole time. You are a faker and not even a decent one. I'm sure the kind leftists who helped you out when you begged for money would be thrilled to know this. Deceitful.
#2010#2011#2016#2019#2022#2023#Twitter#Telegram#Facebook#heidilore#heidilore76#annoyedwoman89#geekyphoto76#Heidi_seidr#heidiforliberty#heidilore2#sp00kyheidi1#anarchism#libertarian#conservative#2021#HLFromHell
0 notes
Text
On Video
Here we have you as a guest on a podcast. You spoke twice in the 25ish minutes you were on this podcast before your phone battery died. You added absolutely nothing to the conversation. In your introduction you said you worked "occasionally as a nurse," then changed it to "nursing assistant," neither of which you are.
youtube
Then you get a chance to offer something of substance and you go on to prove that you don't actually know anything. When you are put on the spot, you deflect and talk about a true free marking being or involving "Anarchist Capitalists," which is not a thing and you make zero sense.
youtube
You're boring and there is nothing to you. You don't know anything and it's abundantly clear in all the talking you do, but the saying of nothing. In text you come across as some wildly qualified person to speak on these topics, but it's clear that is not true.
0 notes
Text
"Stalking"
Imagine our surprise when we saw this! It didn't take long to find out what had happened. We missed your original post, but one of your followers saved it.
A better look at what you said:
Claiming you have "items" to defend yourself suggests a gun. This also suggests that someone is going to come to your home. We all know this isn't true. Even if they were, it wouldn't be hard to locate you as it's all online anyway. Besides, what "items" are you talking about? Fake Bachelor's Degrees? Someone else's nursing license? Pretty scary stuff.
Of course, this allegation brought the "support" of people who believed you.
You love to concern troll, as we already know. The truth though, is that you're not being stalked. You were trolled by a couple of people, blocked them and that was it. You never addressed them. You didn't even just protect your tweets after your announcement. Why make an announcement and then deactivate your account? Just say it and move on? We know why: you're nervous about people finding out who you really are, what you have said that is still up on Twitter and you aren't sure that one of your followers wasn't the trolls. You don't trust your followers because you associate with shitty people.
So, stalking someone is not retweeting things they said publicly that are still readable. Stalking someone is not liking a reply to you. You are really using the word wrong, and you know you are, because it's a framing device for further lies. You will claim someone shared private information about you when that has never happened. No one on here or elsewhere has shared anything you posted on a locked account. Everything shared is publicly available.
The irony of this anticipated claim when you do come back to Twitter (we all know you can't stay off the app) is that last year you had no issue sharing others' private info. Whether it was photos of your job training, messages from your superiors or photos of your coworkers, you had no problem sharing them.
You get the idea.
So, maybe don't project, and if you didn't have a whole mound of lies to hide, you wouldn't be so paranoid.
0 notes
Text
The Live Shooter Situation
You geotag your tweets, Heidi. We know where you tweet from. We know which hospital you work at.
You very clearly work at the St. Vincent INFIRMARY in Little Rock.
So weird that you have to wake up four hours early to get there when you live only 41 minutes away. Call it an hour. So an hour to get there, maybe an hour to get ready with breakfast, any shower, but what about those other two hours? Don't say you're using/spending them with your kid because there is no way your then eight-year-old was waking up pre-6:00 for literally no reason.
Ah yes. The tweet that reminds us that you need to milk every fucking situation you possibly can. Your tweet from Little Rock saying that you're in an "active shooter" situation. What a great chance for you to get some sympathy and clout.
One of your followers kindly even linked the news article to the....wait a minute. It says here that the shooting incident, which for the record was not an "active shooter" event, which makes it seem like it was a mass shooting, but a man went to a hospital and shot a patient. One person was shot; the target. You were never in danger. Know how else I know you were never in danger?
You were 11 miles away. Your tweets always had very specific location information, so while Sherwood is considered a LR suburb, if you were in Sherwood, you would have said so.
You didn't though. The shooting took place at a hospital in the family of hospitals you work for, but not the one you work at.
This article called the shooting "an isolated event that just happened to take place in a public facility" and said that the hospital at which the situation occured was CHI St. Vincent North in Sherwood. You work at CHI St. Vincent Infirmary in Little Rock. Did you just think no one would notice?
Another article about the shooting, too.
After the shooting, which happened September 28, 2002, you literally never mentioned it again save for some vague posts about the hospital not offering you therapy, which they WOULD provide to the workers who were actually present and suffered distress. You ended up finishing up your shift and then didn't bring it up again.
In fact, about a month after this traumatizing event, you were complaining about your job when someone brought up the shooting.
Which, you know, is a totally normal and real thing that people who have actually been in shooter situations do. "Almost forgot" about a seriously horrifying event that happened a month ago. Sure.
So we don't think you were even at the hospital that had this shooting incident. You simply rode the news and tried to convince everyone you were the victim, yet again, so we should feel sorry for you.
Well, earlier this year there was an actual active shooter event at a bank which resulted in people dying. Your most recent account edge-quoted news of the tragedy as per, however, you must have gone from "almost" forgetting to completely forgetting because you mocked bankers, and didn't say shit about the victims. Again, NOT something someone who was actually in a shooter situation like you claimed to, would say.
Whatever, though.
0 notes
Text
...when did you ever stay with Orthodox Jews, Heidi? Do they know how you feel about Jewish people?
0 notes
Text
Transphobia & Homophobia
Here you are liking a reply to your likely fake claim that people were calling you an “ugly transgender man.” The replier was suggesting that those calling you that were themselves blue-haired pansexual LBGT activists as if it was an insult. When this account was in this infancy, you were still undecided if you were going to go with the AnnoyedWoman89 route again or revert back to Heidi_Seidr. So we see light transphobia in early posts like this.
This is something that I didn’t really think I would be covering, but it seems to be a recurring theme in your posts, especially and primarily in your “Antichrist Slayer” account. I only really noticed your homophobia and transphobia when I was getting receipts for your antisemitism for the second or third time. However, your replies to tweets speak for themselves.
A recent search of your mention of “transgender” brought up these two posts. Not a peep about the various anti-trans legislature that every other person who considers themselves a leftist has addressed at least once at this point. It’s not a surprise that you don’t care about trans people and their plight, considering you repeatedly made transphobic remarks.
Yeah, real nice.
Here you are, invalidating someone’s identity by making a very rightwing joke about it.
Spreading the narrative that transgender people are sex offenders, groomers and pedophiles by suggesting that they can and do use privacy laws to their nefarious benefit.
Again, making a joke about “men dressed like women,” is a very rightwing thing to say.
Calling a man a “fan girl” is clear attempt to emasculate them. If you think this is a stretch, there is more.
This doesn’t even make sense in context. We know you are a Ye fan, though, so anyone who talks bad about him is ripe for homophobic remarks.
Further remarks suggesting someone is gay (or at least not straight) and using it interchangeably with something being wrong with them.
Another attempt at insulting someone by calling them gay. I was thinking that maybe this guy did have a husband, but he apparently does not:
And lastly, even though I have other examples but I’m tired, for this post at least, here you are calling a gay couple who adopted a baby “depraved.”
0 notes
Text
Dipshit
Your son is not only not a Gen Z, but he also didn't say "you don't speak for him." Please. This is just pathetic,
0 notes
Text
Another thing you enjoy doing is making your small town look smaller than it is. I'm not sure if you do this to show you are some sort of rose growing out of a lake of crap or what, but it's such an easily disproved lie that you like to repeat.
0 notes
Text
One thing you like to do when you get enough followers is concern-trolling. While this is nothing compared to your whopper last September, which we will get to another time, you often post things to get attention, wanting people to build you up and sing your praises. You LIVE for online validation.
You have a history of doing this. Here are two more examples.
You love posting this stuff som people swarm to you and say how they need you to stay online and they would miss you sooooo much if you left.
This is manipulative.
0 notes
Text
Your biography on Substack as of this date. You state previous jobs include nursing and editing errors for the US military.
This is not the first time you have claimed to have been a nurse. You are not a nurse. You are a Patient Care Technician.
One might be tempted to give you the benefit of the doubt, saying that PCT is in the "nursing field." Fine. However, here are are several times claiming to be a nurse.
Thing is though, hospitals don't have "respiratory units." You can't have one unit where all respiratory patients are kept. We learned this last century.
You went on this tirade against this user, who (rightfully) didn't believe you when you said you were a nurse. You claim you got a nursing degree from University of Wisconsin, but this is not mentioned anywhere you discuss your education. Odd.
Or did you get this nursing degree at the same time you were getting your Anthropology/Archeology Bachelor's degrees? That was a BUSY two years for you!
As far as "editing errors for the US Military," I highly doubt it. Firstly, I'm pretty sure that requires some sort of security clearance. You have never, ever mentioned any sort of armed forces job. Per the above you did go to a technical college for editing. I don't think that counts though.
Not sure if you refer to your Information Services job you had for five months at a historic Army landmark as military work, though you were a civilian.
Looks like this lie is an amalgamation of your jobs, neither of which is actually editing errors for the US military. What did you do, update guest records in the Information Services? Were you a tour guide?
1 note
·
View note
Text
One degree in two fields, each a four-year program.
Quite the feat as you only attended college for these studies from 1999-2001 (class of 2002)
Then again, this is an older LinkedIn profile. So let's go to a more recent one.
From your current profile, which is attached to your present job. You don't have Anthropology or Archeology listed at all, because you don't actually have a Bachelor's in either field. You did two years of a Bachelor's study.
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
silencetracker
Puppo Acosta
unabashedwizardzombie
Untitled
carolynplays
Carolyn Plays
ghost86time220-blog
$Ghost$