Tumgik
#devos
Text
Iowa's starvation strategy
Tumblr media
I don’t really buy that “the cruelty is the point.” I’m a materialist. Money talks, bullshit walks. When billionaires fund unimaginably cruel policies, I think the cruelty is a tactic, a way to get the turkeys to vote for Christmas. After all, policies that grow the fortune of the 1% at the expense of the rest of us have a natural 99% disapproval rating.
If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/19/whats-wrong-with-iowa/#replicable-cruelty
So when some monstrous new law or policy comes down the pike, it’s best understood as a way of getting frightened, angry — and often hateful — people to vote for policies that will actively harm them, by claiming that they will harm others — brown and Black people, women, queers, and the “undeserving” poor.
Pro-oligarch policies don’t win democratic support — but policies that inflict harm a ginned-up group of enemies might. Oligarchs need frightened, hateful people to vote for policies that will secure and expand the power of the rich. Cruelty is the tactic. Power is the strategy. The point isn’t cruelty, it’s power:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/25/roe-v-wade-v-abortion/#no-i-in-uterus
But that doesn’t change the fact that the policies are cruel indeed. Take Iowa, whose billionaire-backed far-right legislature is on a tear, a killing spree that includes active collaboration with rapists, through a law that denies abortion care to survivors of rape and forces them to bear and care for their rapists’ babies:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/16/us/politics/iowa-kamala-harris-abortion.html
The forced birth movement is part of the wider far-right tactic of standing up for imaginary children (e.g. “the unborn,” fictional victims of Hollywood pedo cabals), and utterly abandons real children: poor kids who can’t afford school lunches, kids in cages, kids victimized by youth pastors, kids forced into child labor, etc.
So Iowa isn’t just a forced birth state, it’s a state where children are now to be starved, literally. The state legislature has just authorized an $18m project to kick people off of SNAP (aka food stamps). 270,000 people in Iowa rely on SNAP: elderly people, disabled people, and parents who can’t feed their kids.
Writing in the Washington Post, Kyle Swenson profiles some of these Iowans, like an elderly woman who visited Lisa Spitler’s food pantry for help and said that state officials had told her that she was only eligible for $23/month in assistance:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/04/16/iowa-snap-restrictions-food-stamps/
That’s because Iowa governor KimReynolds signed a bill cutting the additional SNAP aid — federally funded, and free to the state taxpayers of Iowa — that had been made available during the lockdown. Since then, food pantries have been left to paper over the cracks in the system, as Iowans begin to starve.
Before the pandemic, Spitler’s food pantry saw 30 new families a month. Now it’s 100 — and growing. Many of these families have been kicked off of SNAP because they failed to complete useless and confusing paperwork, or did so but missed the short deadlines now imposed by the state. For example, people with permanent disabilities and elderly people who no longer work must continuously file new paperwork confirming that their income hasn’t changed. Their income never changes.
SNAP recipients often work, borrow from relations, and visit food pantries, and still can’t make ends meet, like Amy Cunningham, a 31 year old mother of four in Charlton. She works at a Subway, has tapped her relatives for all they can afford, and relies on her $594/month in SNAP to keep her kids from going hungry. She missed her notice of an annual review and was kicked off the program. Getting kicked off took an instant. Getting reinstated took a starving eternity.
Iowa has a budget surplus of $1.91B. This doesn’t stop ghouls like Iowa House speaker Pat Grassley (a born-rich nepobaby whose grandpa is Senator Chuck Grassley) from claiming that the cuts were a necessity: “[SNAP is] growing within the budget, and are putting pressure on us being able to fund other priorities.”
Grassley’s caucus passed legislation on Jan 30 to kick people off of SNAP if their combined assets, including their work vehicle, total to more than $15,000. SNAP recipients will be subject to invasive means-testing and verification, which will raise the cost of administering SNAP from $2.2m to $18m. Anyone who gets flagged by the system has 10 days to respond or they’ll be kicked off of SNAP.
The state GOP justifies this by claiming that SNAP has an “error rate” of 11.81%. But that “error rate” includes people who were kicked off SNAP erroneously, a circumstance that is much more common than fraud, which is almost nonexistent in SNAP programs. Iowa’s error rate is in line with the national average.
Iowa’s pro-starvation law was authored by a conservative dark-money “think tank” based in Florida: the Opportunity Solutions Project, the lobbying arm of Foundation For Government Accountability, run by Tarren Bragdon, a Maine politician with a knack for getting money from the Koch Network and the DeVos family for projects that punish, humiliate and kill marginalized people. The Iowa bill mirrors provisions passed in Kentucky, Kansas, Wisconsin and elsewhere — and goes beyond them.
The law was wildly unpopular, but it passed anyway. It’s part of the GOP’s push for massive increases in government spending and bureaucracy — but only when those increases go to punishing poor people, policing poor people, jailing poor people, and spying on poor people. It’s truly amazing that the “party of small government” would increase bureaucratic spending to administer SNAP by 800% — and do it with a straight face.
In his essay “The Utopia of Rules,” David Graeber (Rest in Power) described this pathology: just a couple decades ago, the right told us that our biggest threat was Soviet expansion, which would end the “American way of life” and replace it with a dismal world where you spent endless hours filling in pointless forms, endured hunger and substandard housing, and shopped at identical stores that all carried the same goods:
https://memex.craphound.com/2015/02/02/david-graebers-the-utopia-of-rules-on-technology-stupidity-and-the-secret-joys-of-bureaucracy/
A society that can’t feed, house and educate its residents is a failed state. America’s inability to do politics without giving corporations a fat and undeserved share is immiserating an ever-larger share of its people. Federally, SNAP is under huge stress, thanks to the “public-private partnership” at the root of a badly needed “digital overhaul” of the program.
Writing for The American Prospect, Luke Goldstein describes how the USDA changed SNAP rules to let people pay with SNAP for groceries ordered online, as a way to deal with the growing problem of food deserts in poor and rural communities:
https://prospect.org/health/2023-04-19-retail-surveils-food-stamp-users/
It’s a good idea — in theory. But it was sabotaged from the start: first, the proposed rule was altered to ban paying for delivery costs with SNAP, meaning that anyone who ordered food online would have to use scarce cash reserves to pay delivery fees. Then, the USDA declined to negotiate discounts on behalf of the 40 million SNAP users. Finally, the SNAP ecommerce rules don’t include any privacy protections, which will be a bonanza for shadowy data-brokers, who’ll mine SNAP recipients’ data to create marketing lists for scammers, predatory lenders, and other bottom-feeder:
https://www.democraticmedia.org/sites/default/files/field/public-files/2020/cdd_snap_report_ff.pdf
The GOP’s best weapon in this war is statistical illiteracy. While racist, sexist and queerphobic policies mean that marginalized people are more likely than white people to be poor, America’s large population of white people — including elderly white people who are the immovable core of the GOP base — means that policies that target poor people inevitably inflict vast harms on the GOP’s most devoted followers.
Getting these turkeys to vote for Christmas is a sound investment for the ultra-rich, who claim a larger share of the American pie every year. The rich may or may not be racist, or sexist, or queerphobic — some of them surely are — but the reason they pour money into campaigns to stoke divisions among working people isn’t because they get off on hatred. The hatred is a tactic. The cruelty is a tactic. The strategic goal is wealth and power.
Tomorrow (Apr 21), I’m speaking in Chicago at the Stigler Center’s Antitrust and Competition Conference. This weekend (Apr 22/23), I’m at the LA Times Festival of Books.
[Image ID: The Iowa state-house. On the right side of the steps is an engraved drawing of Oliver Twist, holding out his porridge bowl. On the left side is the cook, denying him an extra portion. Peeking out from behind the dome is a business-man in a suit with a dollar-sign-emblazoned money-bag for a head.]
Image: Iqkotze (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iowa_State_Capitol_April_2010.jpg
CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
573 notes · View notes
oldshowbiz · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
The DeVos Family has been a corrupting force in American politics for several generations.
146 notes · View notes
rapeculturerealities · 7 months
Text
Law Student Accused of Beheading Girlfriend Was Touted as ‘Victim’ of #MeToo by Trump Admin - The Messenger
Roberts appeared on ABC's Nightline and shared his story, claiming that he was presumed guilty.
He said sharing his story with DeVos in 2018 was a "big deal," according to ABC News.
Roberts also joined forces with Families Advocating for Campus Equality, a nonprofit that assists the accused who say they’re not being treated fairly.
“The mission of FACE is to support and advocate for equal treatment and due process for those affected by inequitable Title IX campus disciplinary processes, and influence campus culture through outreach and education,” according to the group's site.
38 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Johnny learns Lyja isn't dead like he thought... but he also knows Skrulls like to lie a lot and pretend to be people so he isn't 100% sure... Anyway, Lyja is wild on this one if she really thinks Johnny just abandoned her...
6 notes · View notes
thoughtportal · 1 year
Video
DeVos loses!
22 notes · View notes
detournementsmineurs · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
"L'Homme d'Argile" d'Anaïs Tellenne vaec Raphaël Thiéry, Emmanuelle Devos, Marie-Christine Orry et Mireille Pitot, février 2024.
2 notes · View notes
ausetkmt · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
L'autre jour, au café, je commande un demi. J'en bois la moitié. Il ne m'en restait plus. - Raymond Devos, Il y a des choses bizarres, 1968.
Chalon-sur-Saône, Saône-et-Loire.
20 notes · View notes
beeclops · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
edgarmoser · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
affiche originale - savignac - devos - pathé marconi - vinyle - humouriste - 1968
3 notes · View notes
romanceddawn · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
9K notes · View notes
oldshowbiz · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The hysteria claiming that there's a free speech crisis on college campuses is largely funded by the far-right billionaire families of DeVos and Koch.
29 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Speaking of "Guess who's back!" we see that Lyja is alive, and in the hands of Paibok... who is teaming up with Devos, and if you don't know either of those names, I don't blame you.
9 notes · View notes
markscherz · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
now accepting guesses as to what this embryo becomes when it matures
7K notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
"Mascarade" de Nicolas Bedos avec Marine Vacth, Pierre Niney, Isabelle Adjani, François Cluzet, Emmanuelle Devos, Laura Morante et Charles Berling, novembre 2022.
3 notes · View notes
nickywhoisi · 1 year
Text
Okay shout out to @02cm for
tfw u want people to comment back and talk to you because you're lonely, only to get a user with an extremely bad hairpin trigger case, what seemes to be a fascist denial of allowing me free speech, a salty attitude about her taste in ships, and a dumpster fire take on a piece of art with a subject I feel many things about and just wanted to comment on? Like the first thing this nutcase says to me is "why are you reblogging a piece about how perfect akane and ranma are for eachother, with what you said about them" and so much onward
why you ask? because um...kiddo? You uploaded art? And maybe I liked the art? And I like Ranma 1/2? And it invoked a lot of things I had to say? Things I've been starving for a platform to share with the world? And that I am within every goddamn right to say as I please about anything? That I am not unallowed to have my opinions shared on the internet? That my opinion was cultivated carefully by being a decades long fan, probably for much longer than you, and is informed completely on what I've seen in the series? And that maybe you shouldn't be online or uploading anything if you apparently can't handle a thought different from your own? Like do you know how social media works is this literally your first day
Like there is so much to unpack. She turned off messages so I can't talk to her discreetly like I wanted to, because of course she is a fascist coward. What else am I supposed to call an absurd hysterical authoritarian who doesn't want me to use the site's built in functions to be able to speak. This is a disturbed child if they're not an adult fascist. Are you fuckin ok do you need the paramedics
0 notes