#affiliate marketing p | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

genericpuff · 1 year

Note

you ripped off your entire "theory" about LO being made for kids from Pyrrhic Victoria's latest video lol. Word for word, that's pretty hypocritical but then I guess that's to be expected from the person who still financially supports Webtoon and LO even though you've based your entire image off how much you supposedly hate LO

if I "ripped off" P&V then this is news to me because I've only watched each one of their videos once (they're long and they cover a SHITLOAD of topics, bruh) and it's been ages, BUT-

This honestly makes for a great segue to talk about opinion sharing in the fandom in general because ima be honest with you, there's like... only so much you can talk about in the LO crit community. Like as much as we make fun of the stans for all sharing one echo chamber of opinions, the ULO community isn't that much different in the sense of like, having the same takes and opinions about the topic we've chosen to unite on and being hyper passionate about it to the point of having the same conversations at least ONCE per week. Like it's just a webcomic about pink and blue people, a lot of takes are pretty much the exact same and that's not a BAD thing but ... both P&V and I have been in the ULO stratosphere for AGES now so ?? There's only SO MUCH to cover about LO before it all starts blurring together lmao I can't "own" an opinion, and they undoubtedly know that they can't "own" any one specific opinion either, especially within a fandom like this. C'mon now.

"LO is made for babies" or "LO is marketed to children" is also one of the way more common takes, that's like saying I'm ripping off panel redraw accounts for doing my own panel redraws. LO's been compared to other things that are commonly marketed to children like MCU films, Disney movies/shows, etc. time and time again because that's been SUPER common knowledge for YEARS now prior to any of us joining the community, regardless of "who joined first", it's literally WT's entire business model and it's pretty plainly obvious. The specific comparison I made was just one that came to me during a ramble on stream the other night and I wanted to put it to paper because that's what I do here. If that specific comparison has been made in the past already in a 3 hour video that I completely forgot/didn't realize, then great! I'm not the only one who came to this conclusion! Thanks for the validation!

None of this is with shade at P&V or even you, btw, I think it's honorable you want to stand up for them if you enjoy their stuff and I can't harp on you for that but like... this ain't it? Y'all gotta understand this community is still HELLA small as far as fandom culture goes, we all know everybody, have helped build these parts of the community together from cardboard and glue whether or not we still directly affiliate with each other, and share many of the same takes and schools of thought that stem back YEARS before even WE were in the community ourselves so it's kinda silly to try and point fingers at any one person and say "abc is ripping off xyz!" esp when the "ripping off" is just like, having the same opinion about something? A lot of both our takes also intersect with takes from other antiLO accounts and channels that pre-existed theirs and my own. It's a fandom, after all, no single person can lay claim to any specific opinion we're all coming from many of the same schools of thought with foundations that pre-exist us, it's just different people delivering their own unique spins on takes that have been heard many times before. Some of us do re-imaginings, some of us do panel edits, some of us just crack great jokes about it. We're not all pals with each other, we're not even all from the same platforms or community bubbles, but I think we're all pretty familiar with each other's content and what each one of us is about for the most part.

I know you're likely not gonna take "trust me" as a promise that I'm not ripping anyone off, but like... trust me, I'm not sitting here sifting through P&V's 15+ hour video backlog and going "huehuehue I'm gonna steal this!" because I would gain nothing from doing that and their content is ultimately just part of a bigger genre of topics and opinions that are constantly being re-assessed and re-discussed as the comic goes on, they were just the first ones to make an ongoing Youtube series about it (which is commendable in and of itself with how much content they've made around it, most other Youtubers just review it once in 20-90 minutes and call it a day).

P&V's contributions to these discussions have their own personal unique flair to them but the opinions themselves aren't all brand new revelations. Back when I still watched their videos, their alternate scenarios as to how something could be written were pretty neat because it came with their own unique experiences and viewpoints as webcomic creators which isn't something you'll find on every other account. But "LO is marketed to children and here's why" isn't exactly one of those takes because it's one we've all talked about in the community LONG before those videos even existed. And it's been talked about since before any of us were in the community, period. So... yeah, that's pretty much all I have to say on that lmao it's not that complicated, there's no "conspiracy" going on here, it's a Tumblr post about something that's already been talked about in the past by many others, my guy.

As a closing note, accusing me of being hypocritical on the basis of something you don't even have facts on like "financially supporting Webtoons and LO" is such a silly hill to die on, c'mon pal. You want me to stand here and tell you my side of it as if you're even gonna believe me? Because even if I do say "actually, I no longer even have the Webtoons app on my phone and I can't even remember the last time I paid for coins on the app because all the series I usually FP nowadays are on hiatus and I stopped FP'ing LO back at the start of S3" are you really gonna believe me? Did you even bother to read through the majority of this post? You want receipts or something? What do you want from me? I got nothing to hide, but I'm not gonna sit here and try to explain myself to someone hiding behind an anon filter who's already decided I'm a hack so idk what you want 🤣 Even if I did still FP the series, what then? There are people in this community who do still FP to keep up on content so they can keep talking about it, why is that a crime all of a sudden? Since when did this become some kind of weird "prove you're loyal" indoctrination? Or are you just mad my takes are basic?

#anon walks into an antiLO blog and goes 'you built your entire image around hating LO'#like okay welcome to red lobster ofc we serve lobster what else did you expect #welcome to social media where people show you what they want you to see #i do have a whole life outside of here y'know #y'all just don't know it exists because this is the only place where the majority of you engage with me #no shit it's gonna look like my life revolves around antiLO when that's the only menu you're being served #never mind the 2000 page webcomic series i worked on for a decade #or the day job i have that's not even related to comics at all #imagine really thinking one blog on tumblr is someone's 'whole image'#this place ain't even my whole night #lore olympus critical #anti lore olympus #antiloreolympus #lo critical #ama #ask me anything #anon ask me anything #anon ama #spicy post

68 notes · View notes

tau1tvec · 2 years

Text

Thinking my biggest concern with this “official” mods business, is how The Sims Team is very intrinsically using the word “safe” in how they describe it, and that's bad... and lemme tell you why...

This is a sentiment they’ve been building for a long time now, and goes as far back as The Sims 2 days, when there were some folks who didn’t download mods or cc from any place that didn’t seem obviously aligned with Maxis or EA ( shit they still do it now, as I recently bumped into a tweet that legit thought the sharing of tray files means it's from a pirated game, and therefore the files are "dangerous" ), hence the rise of sites like The Sims Resource, that I believe at one point even got into trouble for using official logos and marketing material, and generally passing themselves off as an affiliate, while taking people’s money for content, which technically didn’t follow EULA.

However the general distaste some players had for spaces like TSR ( mind you this was in their "members only" era ), and preference for sites like Mod The Sims ( a site made by simmers for simmers that hosted content for free ) inevitably changed the eco system. LJ and forums became havens for a lot of the custom content people put in their games, and also offered a sense of community that TSR couldn’t.

With the release of The Sims 3 came with change however, to how cc was distributed, as much as how players communicated. Many creators migrated from forums to blogspot or tumblr mainly, trading out a community focused platform for one more personal ( similar to LiveJournal ). So many were hosting their own content, their own way on file sharing sites, but with self moderation, unfortunately came the downsides of it.

Though MTS was still quite popular for much of The Sims 3's life span, self moderation had opened the door to self monetization, thus incentivizing creators to move away from sites like MTS, and TSR, and instead adopt ads, and link shorteners like ad-fly. Obviously they didn't garner as much profit as TSR creators, but it was a simple and easy way to generate some kind of money off of their work... problem was... it wasn't safe, and neither was TSR at that point.

When TSR took down their members only model, likely due to pressure from EA and their sudden changes in EULA, they had to find other ways to generate profit, and thus the introduction of ads, so, so many ads... so many that some people complained it would slow down their computers, and some, if clicked on accidently, which tbh wasn't hard with how they were interlaced in seemingly every element on the website, worries of malware and virus began cropping up, by no real surprise, anyone who's grown up during the rise of the internet knows that ads = viruses. This is all just very ingrained in online culture, there's a reason why ad-blockers have been a thing since 4ever.

This didn't seem to stop TSR however, let alone creators who attached their downloads to ad-fly, and therefore once again I bring this conversation around to the word "safe".

I have been around long enough, and in the modding scene long enough to know that mods, no matter where you get them will never be safe. Much of modding was niche and fringe for a lot of gaming history, hence why it was so, and still is predominately overwhelmed by adult/erotic mods... like with pirating games, it's just always had this very, very big stigma around it, and with the recent issue of Patreon creators using manipulation tactics, and data stalking causing such a big kerfuffle in the community, that it got to the likes of EA themselves to finally decide to put their foot down on the whole issue ( and then pull it up idk ??? lol ) it all seems just so very... coincidental to me.

This isn't the first time either, there was the putting viruses in files shared with anti-paywall sites, hall passes written out by "lawyers" to excuse bad behavior, the TSR debacle, the p*do mod debacle, the LoversLab having to scrub their forum of "questionable mods" debacle, the DMCA's, the doxxing, the deleted blogs, the list goes on honestly, it's just been such a mess. Then, while all this was going on, whatever EA offered as a "safe space" for downloading user created content wasn't honestly any better.

The Sims Exchange was a mixed bag, a lotta times you'd download sims or homes with broken or corrupt cc attached, and lord knows what else... people would reupload content by other people without their consent, or even credit, which by no surprise at all ended being the same exact issue that eventually inundated The Sims 4 Gallery, not to mention the comments section being used to harass users.

tldr; modding will never truly be safe, the fact that the word "safe", this rather bold promise coming out of EA's mouth of all companies is even going to be remotely believed, bc some Sims YouTuber says it's also "safe", just really rubs me the wrong way, and says a lot about how true a statement it actually is. They're trying to stigmatize the modding community again... who's trustworthy, and who isn't trustworthy... who's good, and who's evil, and all for their own benefit... bc when the hell has EA ever once done anything, that wasn't mostly for their own benefit?

#pedophillia mention #stalking mention

133 notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 1 year

Text

Citizens United and the FTX meltdown

The collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange and its affiliated businesses has left a million creditors holding the bag for a chaotically managed, corrupt enterprise that created vast personal fortunes for the conspirators who ran it, even as it stole the life’s savings of retail investors who bought into its lies.

Could the unsuspecting public have been shielded from the FTX Ponzi scheme? Hindsight is 20/20, but there’s good reason to believe that FTX could have been brought down in a controlled glide, rather than a nose-first crash landing and ensuing fireball.

Earlier this year, the SEC sent a letter to FTX seeking answers about its business practices — a letter that sought to determine whether FTX was as scammy as it appeared. The SEC never got the answers it sought, thanks to the intervention of eight Members of Congress — the “Blockchain Eight,” four Dems and four Republicans — who wrote to Chairman Gary Gensler demanding that he back off:

https://emmer.house.gov/_cache/files/0/c/0c7fc863-7916-4b19-bc44-52bef772287e/9B0B9D1CA9B3C215DDC762DF5B0F6864.3.16.22.emmer.sec.letter.pdf

Five of Blockchain Eight received substantial cash contributions from FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) or his employees or affiliated businesses and PACs. Bankman-Fried is widely characterized as a Democratic super-donor, but his political spending is basically 50–50:

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recipients?id=D000073694&cycle=2022

SBF held himself out as a philosopher king, a devotee to esoteric ethical precepts and a concerned billionaire who was committed to saving the world from ugly political currents; after the collapse, he confessed that this was all marketing nonsense (“this dumb game we woke westerners play”):

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23462333/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-cryptocurrency-effective-altruism-crypto-bahamas-philanthropy

SBF and his co-conspirators gave money to politicians to further their own ends, not to save the world. They understood that if they gave money to politicians, that politicians would intercede to keep regulators from keeping them honest.

The questions in the original SEC letter went to the heart of the FTX fraud, seeking to establish that FTX was marketing unregulated securities disguised as a “rewards” program, and that FTX was stealing from depositors and handing their money to its hedge-fund affiliate Alameda to gamble with.

Hedge-fund managers are notoriously bad at their jobs, generally underperforming a low-load S&P 500 index fund, but even by those low standards, Alameda was a very bad hedge-fund, losing $3.7b in a “raging crypto bull market.”

https://twitter.com/GRDecter/status/1595065298771656704

SBF’s reputation as a boy-wonder genius investor wasn’t the result of the returns to Alameda, but rather, the seemingly limitless funds that Alameda could tap into for more failed investments. Those funds, we now know, were stolen from FTX’s retail customers. This is exactly the kind of thing that an SEC investigation could have revealed.

The vast sums of (real) money the crypto industry pumped into electoral politics is closely related to its bull run — campaign contributions muzzled finance watchdogs, which let the industry defraud the public, which gave it more money for campaign contributions.

This is a completely foreseeable outcome of unlimited campaign finance, especially the “dark money” finance that the 2010 Citizens United decision unleashed. CU removed the final barrier to massive influence campaigns by the ultra-rich, who poured money into the political system:

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/a-decade-under-prsns-united

The irony here is that the same wealthy people who argued that “money was speech” and campaign finance was merely a way for people to exercise their First Amendment rights are also the foremost proponents of a political ideology whose central tenet is “incentives matter.”

These are the same people who say that every visit to the doctor should cost money, lest we create a “moral hazard” that invites people who aren’t really sick to go bother the doctor for shits and giggles (it goes without saying that these co-payments are titrated to keep poor people from visiting the doctor, while the rich never feel the sting) (that’s because rich people don’t suffer moral hazard).

This belief in incentives as the final arbiter of all behavior is the fundamental tenet of economism, and it underpins all our cruelest policies. For an economismist, anyone espousing a sense of duty or mission is merely “virtue signalling”:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/27/economism/#what-would-i-do-if-i-were-a-horse

This slavish belief in incentives is why would-be aristocrats like Sam Walton prohibited his executives from taking so much as a glass of water from vendors’ salesmen, lest they become tempted into favoring the salesman’s commissions over Walmart’s profits.

But these exact same people profess a belief in unlimited political spending as a means to better governance. Somehow, a glass of water will corrupt a corporate buyer, but a $100m super-PAC donation will have no impact on the judgment of an elected official.

Covering the Blockchain Eight bribery scandal for The American Prospect, David Dayen hearkens back to the Keating Five scandal of 1987, when five senators wrote to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to insist that they lay off Lincoln Savings and Loan:

https://prospect.org/power/congressmembers-tried-to-stop-secs-inquiry-into-ftx/

Lincoln’s chairman, Charles Keating Jr, had donated $1.3m to the Keating Five between 1982–7, and their letter convinced the FHLBB to close its investigation, whereupon Lincoln promptly collapsed, sticking the American public with a $3.4b bailout bill.

Like the Keating Five, the Blockchain Eight set out to stop regulators from investigating a company that was engaged in a titanic fraud. Like the Keating Five, the Blockchain Eight benefited from sizable campaign contributions from the industry they caped for.

Unlike the Keating Five — who faced a Senate ethics inquiry and sanctions — the Blockchain Eight are completely unrepentant. The Eight’s ringleader, Rep Tom Emmer (R-MN) has even accused SEC Chairman Gensler of secretly being in the tank for FTX:

https://twitter.com/RepTomEmmer/status/1590717374801809409

Just last week, Emmer told the Blockchain Association, “You are here to stay…[nobody should] rush in and put a huge wet blanket of regulation atop this industry just because something didn’t go right.”

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/11/16/newly-elected-us-house-whip-emmer-downplays-ftx-meltdown-cheers-crypto/

Emmer is on the House Financial Services Committee, along with five other members of the Blockchain Eight: Ritchie Torres (D-NY), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), Warren Davidson (R-OH), and Ted Budd (R-NC). This is the committee charged with investigating the FTX fraud.

The great irony of the right’s incentives exceptionalism and its belief in unlimited political bribes is that it leads to the creation of a larger state. Allowing companies to bribe politicians and capture regulators fuels both corporate growth and corporate corruption.

https://doctorow.medium.com/regulatory-capture-59b2013e2526

If the state is to counter that corruption, it must be as powerful as the companies it oversees. The bigger those companies are, the bigger the state has to be. If you truly want a less intrusive, less muscular state, the first step is reining in corporate power.

Image: Cointelegraph (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sam_Bankman-Fried.png

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

[Image ID: A vintage trustbuster cartoon depicting John D Rockefeller holding the Treasury building in the palm of his hand, peering at it through a watchmaker's loupe. Rockefeller's head has been replaced with Sam Bankman-Fried's. His collar bears the Alameda Research wordmark.]

#pluralistic

94 notes · View notes

twistedisciple · 9 months

Text

Fódlan Profile: Griss

PERSONAL INFORMATION

GENDER. Male AGE. 27 HEIGHT. 177cm BIRTHDATE. 9/17 CREST/HOLY BLOOD. None CLASS. Unaffiliated AFFILIATION. Four Hounds

BIOGRAPHY. One member of a group that calls itself the Four Hounds. A long-time disciple of Lord Sombron, he was hand-selected to assist with the fell dragon's revival and subsequent plans. After suffering defeat at the hands of the Divine Dragon's army, he found himself in Fódlan, perhaps transported through one of the gates opened by Sombron's power. Loves pain, both receiving and inflicting it, so has no issue fighting for Garreg Mach while he waits for a divine sign to show him what to do next.

PERSONAL HISTORY

Age 0 - Born the only child to a pair of laborers in rural Elusia

Age 3 - Sold into slavery, eventually wound up in the hands of followers of the Fell Dragon

Age 15 - Selected by Zephia to join the group that would later be called the Four Hounds

Age 27 - Assisted with the resurrection of the fell dragon Sombron and later defeated alongside Zephia

Imperial Year 1181 - Hired as a mercenary by the Church of Seiros

INTERESTS. Fell Religion, Body Modification, Sewing, Crafting, Fishing LIKES. Pain, being rewarded, nature, animals, flowers, scary stories DISLIKES. Training, sweets, extreme heat or cold, fluffy toys, bugs, bland foods, the Divine Dragon STATUS. Former member of the Four Hounds CLOSE ALLIES: Zephia, Marni, Mauvier, Veyle

DINING HALL PREFERENCES

LIKES. daphnel stew, gronder meat skewers, two-fish saute, fisherman's bounty, sauteed jerky, sweet and salty whitefish saute, super-spicy fish dango, garreg mach meat pie, grilled herring, onion gratin soup, pickled rabbit skewers, fish and bean soup, pickled seafood and vegetables

DISLIKES. saghert and cream, sweet bun trio, peach sorbet, country-style red turnip plate, cabbage and herring stew

DINING HALL NOTES

FAVORITE DISH. ✧

"Oh yeah, that hits the spot."

LEAST FAVORITE DISH. ✧

"Beggars can't be choosers, huh..."

TEAM TIME GUIDE

FAVORITE TEA. Cinnamon blend

CONVERSATION TOPICS. a place you'd like to visit. a word of advice. close calls. evaluating allies. exploring the monastery. I'm counting on you. monastery rules. our first meeting. overcoming weaknesses. past laughs. reliable allies. someone you look up to. thanks for everything. the ideal professor. the last battle. working together. a dinner invitation. capable comrades. food in the dining hall. gifts you'd like to receive. books you've read recently. fashion. guessing someone's age. heart-racing memories. relaxing at the sauna. I heard some gossip. you seem different. working hours for guards. the ideal relationship. cooking mishaps. the view from the bridge. children at the market. monastery security. memorable scars. different ways to be hurt. new piercings.

TEA TIME QUOTES

GREETING. ✧

"Not really a guy who likes sitting around sipping tea, so you're gonna have to do something for me when we're done."

FAVORITE TEA. ✧

“Huh? This one's not bad.”

FIVE STAR TEA. ✧

“You must've paid a fortune for this. Too bad I can't tell it apart from the others.”

BEING OBSERVED. ✧

(1) "Wondering about my tattoo? Hold still and I'll give ya one to match." (2) “Plenty of people stare. I don't always let 'em walk away though." (3) “If you got nothing to say, let's have some fun instead."

QUIPS. ✧

"Mmm." “Huh?” “Sure.” “Knock it off.” “Whatever you say.” “Nah.” “What the hell?!” “Want me to hurt ya?” “What d'you mean?” “Sounds boring." “Yeah."

ENDING. ✧

"Can't say there aren't better things I coulda been doing, but I'm not about to let you forget you owe me one now."

FINAL COMMENTS. ✧

(1) I grew up in a monastery where 'afternoon tea' was just a few extra lashes from the whip. ANSWER. Chat, Praise

(2) Fell scripture's against this sorta thing, you know. ANSWER. Nod, Chat

(3) Each one of these tattoos is a scar. Wanna hear how I got 'em? You're gonna have to beat the stories outta me. ANSWER. Laugh, Praise

(4) This is one hell of a punishment, and not the fun kind. ANSWER. Disagree, Admonish

(5) The Four Hounds were handpicked to serve Lord Sombron. Marni thought we were his favorites, but if you ask me, we were just convenient. ANSWER. Commend, Sip Tea

(6) What's your favorite way to be hurt? Mine? Heh. You'll have to find out. ANSWER. Laugh, Chat, Blush (you know who you are)

(7) I know every way to make you hurt just shy of killing you. But I can do that too, if ya want. Answer: Sip Tea, Disagree, Blush (you know who you are)

(8) Friends? Family? Only as good as you can use 'em. ANSWER. Chat, Disagree

(9) Pain's good for everything: education, punishment, torture... even pleasure. ANSWER. Nod, Sip tea

MISCELLANEOUS DIALOGUE.

GIFT GUIDE

FAVORITE GIFTS. Hunting Dagger, Pitcher Plant, Coffee Beans, Fishing Float, Owl Feather DISLIKED GIFTS. Armored Bear Stuffy, Training Weights, Monarch Studies Book

GIFT QUOTES

DISLIKED GIFT. ✧

"Thanks but no thanks."

LIKED GIFT. ✧

"If you're just giving it away for free, I'll take it off your hands."

FAVORITE GIFT. ✧

"This my reward for a job well done?"

LOST ITEMS

SEWING KIT. A small box containing needles of different sizes. It probably belongs to someone skilled in all types of stitch work. Location found: Infirmary

DECORATIVE SASH. A strip of cloth embroidered with eyes of the fell dragon. It probably belongs to a fanatic of the fell church. Location found: Alleyway near Abyss

SPIKED CILICE. A loop of iron worn around the wrist with sharp prongs facing inward. It probably belongs to someone who enjoys pain. Location found: Outside the sauna

LOST ITEM QUOTES OWNER. ✧

"Huh? Yeah, that's mine. Wanna know what it's good for?"

NOT OWNER. ✧

"Never seen this before. Better try someone else."

BATTLE QUOTES

MOCK BATTLE RETREAT. ✧

“As much as I wanna keep playing, rules are rules.”

FIRST KILL. ✧

"Hahahaha! Where's the next one?"

MONASTERY QUOTES

CHOIR PRACTICE. ✧

"You gonna punish me if I sing for Lord Sombron instead?"

COOKING. ✧

"Look at these knives. They got all kinds in here, and each one's kept deadly sharp. Huh? Oh, dinner. Yeah, yeah, just leave it to me."

TUTORING

INSTRUCT

BAD. ✧

"So what's the punishment? Do your worst, Teach."

Critique: Yeah, you got it. Console: Don't waste your breath. Bring out the whip already.

GREAT. ✧

"Next guy in my way is gonna hurt so good." “Better to serve Lord Sombron.”

PERFECT. ✧

"Where's my reward?"

PRAISE. "Can it. Praise is for chumps."

TASKS

STABLE DUTY. ✧

“Wonder what it feels like to have a piece of metal nailed to your foot. Let's find out.”

WEEDING. ✧

"Weeds got their uses, too, believe it or not. Just not where they gotta look pretty to fit in."

SKY WATCH. ✧

“Why do pegasus knights always walk around like they got a stick up their ass when flying like this would be any thrill-seeker's dream." (with Zephia) "So this is what you feel like all the way up here. I could get used to this.”

CERTIFICATION EXAMS

FAILED. ✧

"This is why I didn't go to Elusia's academy."

PASSED. ✧

"What?"

UPDATE GOALS

REASON. ✧

“Magic's always done me right when it comes to killing, but Fódlan's Reason is a whole different beast. I need to know it inside and out if I'm gonna find all the best ways to bring the pain here. Show me the ropes, and I mean I want you to make me feel it!”

FAITH. ✧

“Learning to stitch up wounds and set bones was a necessity back home, but I'd like to take a crack at this kind of magic that calls on Faith. The fun's all over once you die, you know. Putting someone back together keeps it going for as long as you want. Lord Sombron would probably approve, yeah?”

BRAWLING. ✧

“Magic's great 'n all, but being out of reach kinda takes the fun outta the fight. I wanna learn to fight up close so the other guy'll get a better shot at me. Plus, I've seen the kind of damage those steel gloves can do to a person's skull. Got me excited just thinking about it.”

LEVEL UP

0 TO 2 STATS UP . ✧

“That's it?”

3 TO 4 STATS UP . ✧

“Oh yeah, now we're talkin'!”

5 STATS UP . ✧

“Bring on the pain! I'm gonna make you ALL feel it!”

6 STATS UP . ✧

“You watchin', Lord Sombron? All this blood's consecrating the place for ya!”

UPON REACHING LEVEL 99 . ✧

“It's never enough. All this suffering's never gonna be enough, but I'm not about to stop!”

BUDDING TALENT

“So I got other tricks after all.”

NEW SKILL

“I'll get some use outta this.”

RECLASSING . ✧

“Tell me what you want, and I'll do it.”

BATTLE QUOTES

WHEN SELECTED

FULL/HIGH HP . ✧

“Whatever you need.”

MEDIUM HP . ✧

“Fun's just getting started!"

LOW HP . ✧

“Ahahaha!”

ENEMY DEALS 1 OR NO DAMAGE OR MISSES . ✧

(1) “So slow.” (2) “Nah.”

CRTIICAL ATTACK . ✧

(1) “Allow me!” (2) “Rejoice!” (3) “This is gonna hurt!” (4) "I'll show you pain!”

GAMBIT . ✧

“You scared?”

GAMBIT BOOST . ✧

“We're about to have some fun.”

DEFEATED ENEMY . ✧

(1) “The Hounds send their regards.” (2) “How was that?” (3) “I almost envy you.” (4) “Where's my reward?” (5) “Rude.”

ALLY DEFEATS ENEMY . ✧

(1) “Hey, leave some for me!” (2) “That looked painful.” (3) “Look at you go.”

ALLY HEALS/RALLIES . ✧

(1) “I'm back in.” (2) “Got me back on my feet.” (3) “Pain's gone.”

DEFEAT QUOTE

CASUAL . ✧

“Exquisite..”

CLASSIC . ✧

"Nothing... hurts me... anymore...“

THE ADVICE BOX

"Punishment's the only way to fix someone who's strayed off course, but no one's got the guts to lay a hand on me. What's the deal?"

>There are other ways to guide someone (Correct answer) >The monastery is full of cowards >Have you tried a hug?

#headcanons #// finally finished this... took so much lateral thinking to fit griss into this setting #// made me realize that even toned down a bit there is still something deeply wrong with him #// having tea with him would be a Trip #// you'd probably need to be the kind of person who could both take him seriously and also not get ruffled by the things he says #// some of his battle quotes are straight from the game data #// others are inspired by or taken from gregory's #// tfw the only way you know how to connect to other people is by hurting them or them hurting you

9 notes · View notes

tradedmiami · 5 months

Photo

LOAN IMAGE: William Warren Hobin DATE: 12/18/2023 ADDRESS: 16401 Northwest 58th Avenue MARKET: Miami Lakes ASSET TYPE: Development Site ~ ACRES: 1.42 LENDER: TD Bank (@TDBank_US) LANDLORD: William Warren Properties - William Warren Hobin LOAN AMOUNT: $10,360,000 LOAN TYPE: Construction Loan NOTE: TD Bank has provided a $10.36 million construction loan to 16401 NW 58th SP LLC, an affiliate of California-based developer William Warren Properties, for a new StorQuest self-storage facility in Miami Lakes. The three-story facility, with approximately 800 storage units, responds to the rising demand in South Florida's multifamily market. #Miami #RealEstate #tradedmia #MIA #MiamiLakes #DevelopmentSite #WilliamWarrenProperties #TDBank #WilliamWarrenHobin

#Miami #RealEstate #tradedmia #MIA #MiamiLakes #DevelopmentSite #WilliamWarrenProperties #TDBank #WilliamWarrenHobin

3 notes · View notes

religion-is-a-mental-illness · 5 months

Text

By: The Quillette Editorial Board

Published: Dec 23, 2023

The Montgomery, Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was founded in 1971 with a mission to fight poverty and racial discrimination. Its early litigation campaigns, which targeted the Ku Klux Klan and other overtly racist organizations, met with success, and the group soon came to be seen as an authoritative source in regard to right-wing extremism more generally.

Another form of expertise the organization developed was in the area of marketing—especially when the market in question consisted of deep-pocketed urban liberals. As former SPLC staffer Bob Moser reported in a 2019 New Yorker article, the group has consistently taken on attention-grabbing urgent-seeming causes that its leaders knew could be leveraged as a means to gain publicity and—more importantly—donations. It’s no coincidence that the SPLC’s co-founder and long-time fundraising guru, Morris Dees, had previously operated a direct-mail business that sold cookbooks and tchotchkes. “Whether you’re selling cakes or causes, it’s all the same,” Dees told a journalist in 1988.

Dees’ big fundraising break at the SPLC came when he got access to the direct-mail list from the 1972 presidential campaign of Democrat George McGovern. The SPLC co-founder went on to maximize the SPLC’s revenues through what would now be known as targeted methods. According to one former legal colleague, for instance, Dees rarely used his middle name—Seligman—in SPLC mailings, except when it came to “Jewish zip codes.”

Thanks to Dees’ slick marketing expertise, the SPLC was eventually taking in more money than it paid out in operational expenses. (As of October 2022, its endowment fund was valued at almost US$640 million.) But over time, his hard-sell tactics began to alienate co-workers, as there was an obvious disconnect between the real class-based problems they observed in society and the fixations of the naïve northern donors whose wallets Dees was seeking to pry open.

“I felt that [Dees] was on the Klan kick because it was such an easy target—easy to beat in court, easy to raise big money on,” former SPLC attorney Deborah Ellis told Progressive writer John Egerton. “The Klan is no longer one of the South’s biggest problems—not because racism has gone away, but because the racists simply can’t get away with terrorism any more.”

On March 14, 2019, Dees—by now 82 years old, but still listed as the SPLC’s chief trial lawyer—was fired amid widespread rumors that he’d been the subject of internal sexual-harassment accusations. His affiliation was scrubbed from the group’s web site; and the organization’s president, Richard Cohen, cryptically (but damningly) declared that, “when one of our own fails to meet [SPLC] standards, no matter his or her role in the organization, we take it seriously and must take appropriate action.” (Less than two weeks later, Cohen himself left the organization, casting his resignation as part of a transition “to a new generation of leaders.”)

In describing his tenure at the SPLC during the early 2000s, Moser argued that the very structure of the organization betrayed its hypocrisy: Here was an entity dedicated to social justice (as we would now call it), yet which was run by an extremely well-paid, almost exclusively white, corps of lawyers, administrators, and fund-raisers who ruled over a mixed-race corps of junior staff. As far back as the 1980s, Dees was openly admitting that he saw the fight against poverty as passé, and admitted that the “P” in SPLC was an anachronism. Jaded staff began ruefully referring to their own flashy headquarters as the “Poverty Palace.”

Dees and Cohen may have left the Poverty Palace, but the SPLC’s tendency to betray its founding principles clearly remains a problem, as illustrated by a new SPLC report released under the auspices of what the group dubs “Combating Anti-LGBTQ+ Pseudoscience Through Accessible Informative Narratives.” (This verbal clunker seems to have been reverse-engineered in order to yield the acronym, “CAPTAIN.”)

The report purports to demonstrate “the perils of anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience” and “anti-trans narratives and extremism.” Much like the dramatically worded hard-sell direct-mail campaigns that the SPLC started up under Dees, it’s marketed as a matter of life and death: According to the deputy director of research for the SPLC’s “Intelligence Project,” the “anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience” uncovered by the SPLC has “real-life, often life-threatening consequences for trans and non-binary people.”

At this point, it should be stressed that there is certainly nothing wrong with the SPLC—or anyone else—campaigning for the legitimate rights of people who are transgender. Such a campaign would be entirely in keeping with the SPLC’s original liberal ethos. Just as no one should be denied, say, an apartment, a marriage license, or the right to vote based on his or her race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation, no trans person should be denied these rights and amenities simply because he or she experiences gender dysphoria.

But the SPLC’s report hardly confines itself to such unassailable liberal principles. The real point of the project, it seems, was to catalogue and denounce public figures who’ve expressed dissent from the most extreme demands of trans-rights activists—specifically, (1) the demand that children and adolescents who present as transgender must instantly be “affirmed” in their dysphoric beliefs, even if such affirmation leads to a life of sterility, surgical disfigurement, drug dependence, and medical complications; and (2) the demand that biological men who self-identify as women must be permitted unfettered access to protected women’s spaces and sports leagues.

The SPLC’s authors seek to cast their ideological enemies as hate-addled reactionaries whose nefarious activities must “be understood as part of the historical legacy of white supremacy and the political aims of the religious right.” And it is absolutely true that some of the organizations they name-check are hard-right, socially conservative outfits that endorse truly transphobic (and homophobic) beliefs.

But many of the supposed transphobes targeted by the report aren’t even conservative—let alone members of the religious right. In a multitude of cases, they’re simply parents, therapists, and activists who argue the obvious fact that human sexual biology doesn’t evanesce into rainbow dust the moment that a child—or middle-aged man—asserts that he or she was “born in the wrong body.”

It’s also interesting to note who gets left out of the SPLC’s analysis. The most influential figures leading the backlash against (what some call) “gender ideology” are women such as author J.K. Rowling and tennis legend Martina Navratilova, both of whom come at the issue from explicitly feminist perspectives. Being successful public figures, neither woman needs a cent from the conservative think tanks that the SPLC presents as being back-office puppet-masters of the alleged anti-trans conspiracy outlined in the CAPTAIN report.

In keeping with the conspiracist motif that runs through the document, the authors have provided spider-web diagrams that set out the connections binding this (apparently) shadowy cabal. In this regard, it seems that Quillette itself served as one of the SPLC’s sources: In a section titled, “Group Dynamics and Division of Labor within the Anti-LGBTQ+ Pseudoscience Network,” the authors footnote “an August 23, 2023 podcast for Quillette,” wherein

it was revealed that [Colin] Wright is in a relationsihp [sic] with journalist Christina Buttons, who is an advisoary [sic] board member of [the Gender Dysphoria Alliance] with Drs. Lisa Littman and Ray Blanchard, an editoral [sic] board member of Springer’s Archives of Sexual Research [a mistaken reference to the Archives of Sexual Behavior] with J. Michael Bailey. Notably, Buttons and Wright are interviewed by host Jonathan Kay. In addition to hosting Quillette’s podcast, Kay serves on FAIR’s board of advisors.

We’ve chosen to highlight this particular (typo-riddled) text from the report not just because of the absurd suggestion that our publication has enlisted in an imaginary “anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience network,” but also because the above-quoted roll call of supposed gender villains illustrates the intellectual dishonesty that suffuses the whole report.

Let’s go through the references one by one, in the order in which they are presented. The Gender Dysphoria Alliance (GDA) is a group led by people who are themselves transgender, and who are “concerned about the direction that gender medicine and activism has taken.” Are we to imagine that its members are directing transphobia—against themselves? Lisa Littman, formerly of Brown University, is a respected academic who’s published a peer-reviewed analysis of Rapid Onset Gender Disorder. Ray Blanchard is a well-known University of Toronto psychiatrist. The Archives of Sexual Behavior is a peer-reviewed academic journal in sexology. Michael Bailey is a specialist in sexual orientation and gender nonconformity at Northwestern University. Colin Wright is a widely published writer (including at Quillette) with a PhD in evolutionary biology from UC Santa Barbara. (The SPLC’s claim that he is in a relationship with journalist Christina Buttons, who also writes about gender issues, is completely true. But the fact that the group saw fit to report this fact as if it were evidence of sinister machinations says far more about the report’s authors than it does about either Wright or Buttons.) FAIR, the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism, is a classically liberal group led by a Harvard Law School graduate named Monica Harris. Do any of these people or groups sound like extremists?

youtube

The fact that the SPLC is attempting to market its report as a blow against the “anti-LGBTQ+” movement, writ large, is itself quite laughable, since many of the activists who’ve been arguing for a more balanced approach to gender rights are themselves either gay (as with Navratilova and Julie Bindel) or (as with the founders of the GDA) transgender.

Others on the SPLC gender-enemies list are author Abigail Shrier, and therapists Sasha Ayad, and Stella O’Malley. These women openly broadcast their views in best-selling books, as well as mainstream magazines and newspapers. The idea that the SPLC has successfully “exposed” these women through some kind of investigation, as suggested by the title that’s been slapped on the CAPTAIN report, would be ludicrous even if they’d said anything scandalous (which they haven’t).

And what course of future action does the SPLC endorse? For one, it concludes that educators should stigmatize gender-critical views as analogous to “racism, sexism, and heteronormativity.” The report's authors also want academic journals to sniff out groups that “espouse an anti-LGBTQ+ ideology” (as that latter term is speciously defined by the SPLC). And in a final flourish, the group urges reporters to “be aware of the narrative manipulation strategies and the cooptation of scientific credentials and language by anti-trans researchers when sourcing stories about trans experiences.”

With this last point, we get to the real nub: The apparent goal is for this report to be read as a catalogue of people, ideas, and groups that must be shunned. Indeed, the authors explicitly cite the work of one Andrea James, a once-respected arts producer who, as Jesse Singal has documented, now runs a creepy (“stalker” is the word Singal uses) web site called Transgender Map, which lists personal details of anyone whom James deems a gender heretic. When it comes to one-on-one communication, James’ manner of dealing with critics is exemplified by an email sent to bioethicist Alice Dreger, in which James referred to Dreger’s then-five-year-old son as a “womb turd.”

One way to describe the CAPTAIN report is as an SPLC-branded rehash of the information contained on Transgender Map. And one can understand why the authors thought that such a gambit might work. The SPLC already publishes other curated lists of hatemongers—e.g., its “Hatewatch” service, “Hate Map,” and “Intelligence Report.” It wasn’t such a long shot to imagine that this new report might convince readers to treat the listed “Anti-LGBTQ+ Pseudoscience Network” acolytes as equally disreputable.

But if that was the authors’ goal, it doesn’t seem to have been achieved. The SPLC report landed with something of a thud—and has attracted little attention on social media except insofar as it was mocked by its intended targets.

This may have something to do with the report’s timing. For several years now, a backlash against this kind of gender agitprop has been building within many of the same liberal and progressive circles that the SPLC has traditionally targeted for donations. The trend is reflected by the rise of such groups as the LGB Alliance, a coalition of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people who are fed up with the ideological takeover of LGBT groups by a militant subset of trans activists.

The same trend is playing out internationally. While the SPLC does its best to heap blame on America’s conservative Christians, many of western Europe’s governments (none of which are in thrall to the Heritage Foundation or the Charles Koch Foundation) have been following a more gender-critical path for years.

Just a week after the SPLC put out its report, in fact, the UK government published new guidelines advising teachers that they have no duty to automatically “affirm” a child’s assertion that he or she is transgender; and that, in considering such situations, teachers should speak with a child’s parents and consider whether the child is under undue influence from social media or peers. Sweden, Finland, and Norway—hardly bastions of Christian conservatism—have also rolled back policies that rush children into transition. In Canada, several provinces have recently enacted rules that require parents to be notified when a child seeks to transition, even in the face of a sustained media campaign that repeats lurid claims to the effect that such policies will cause an epidemic of trans suicides. Are all of these foreign governments also complicit in the vast “junk-science and disinformation campaign” against trans people that the SPLC claims to have “exposed”?

The SPLC would hardly be the first progressive organization whose reputation has suffered by going all-in on the gender issue. The American Civil Liberties Union, which also was rooted in traditional liberal values before succumbing to more faddish progressive tendencies, has attracted ridicule due to its parroting of slogans such as “men who get their periods are men,” and the claim that males have no “unfair advantage” over females in sports.

These organizations have never been shy about angering conservatives and reactionaries; indeed, they wear such anger as a badge of pride. But their cultish refusal to engage with the reality of biological sex also antagonizes progressive feminists seeking to protect female spaces from biological men, and LGB activists who see the attempted erasure of sex-based attraction as a species of progressive homophobia.

Which is to say that the SPLC’s report seems not only intellectually dishonest, but also self-destructive. While the SPLC leaders who green-lit this project once may have been able to bank on the popularity of pronoun checks and esoteric gender identities among the wealthy white coastal progressives who comprise the bulk of their donors, this is an ideological movement that’s decidedly past its peak. It’s a marketing error that the savvy Dees likely never would have made.

The SPLC obviously does a lot more than lend its name to sloppily edited gender propaganda: A review of its press feed shows that it still has staff working traditional legal beats such as voters’ rights, police accountability, and humane treatment for prisoners. But when an organization publishes misleading materials in regard to one issue, the natural effect is to raise serious questions about the group’s values and credibility more generally—questions that SPLC supporters will want to think about the next time one of the group’s fundraisers hits them up for a donation.

This is what institutional capture looks like.

#Quillette #Southern Poverty Law Center #SPLC #ACLU #American Civil Liberties Union #ideological capture #ideological corruption #gender ideology #queer theory #conspiracy theories #conspiracy theorists #institutional capture #biological sex #biology denialism #sex denialism #gender heretic #gender heresy #religion is a mental illness #Youtube

6 notes · View notes

afflearn · 1 year

Text

Affiliate marketing communications term:2

Hi, welcome back to the journey of affiliate marketing terminology. So let’s continue. Affiliate Software as a Service (SaaS) platform: Similar to affiliate networks, an affiliate SaaS platform is a type of affiliate technology provider. SaaS affiliate technology help in creating tracking links, tracking affiliates’ performance, storing brand creative such as images, paying affiliates once…

View On WordPress

#affiliate #affiliate glossary #affiliate income #affiliate lnk #affiliate marketing #affiliate marketing digital marketing #affiliate marketing p #affiliate marketing vs Digital marketing #Affiliate MIS #affiliate product #affiliate revenue

0 notes

archtroop · 7 months

Text

I'll Google Translate this one became this one is incredibly interesting and fascinating, especially for people who spend a lot of time online.

"An Israeli cyber group announced that it had taken down a Hamas news website: "We will continue to act with a heavy hand"

WeRedEvils is a group of Israeli cyber warriors that was established after the start of the war and operates in the cyber arena against Hamas and its affiliates, and yesterday announced that it had taken down a major news site affiliated with Hamas, Gaza Now. In a conversation with mako, one of the group's managers tells about its activities: "We hacked into the phones and WhatsApp accounts of journalists, terrorists and Hamas officials and published databases of 40 million Iranians"

The group of cyber warriors @WeRedEvils yesterday attacked the GazaNow site, the main news site of the terrorist organization Hamas, which publishes anti-Israeli content, and information about IDF and intelligence operations. The site went down for 18 hours, came back up for a short time and is now working again, but according to the group's servers are expected to collapse within hours again.

WeRedEvils are a group of about 80 Israeli cyber warriors, who have been working since the beginning of the war on a voluntary basis, and take part in the war aid effort. These are former intelligence unit 8200, owners of major cyber companies in Israel, private investigators and Red Hat hackers. The group is closed, and everyone who enters it has undergone a full scan, according to P. G., one of the group's managers, who served as the IDF spokesman and deals with cyber, and asked to remain anonymous. According to him, the group is divided into several teams - intelligence and information gathering, attack, marketing and advertising and social media.

"We hacked and took down Hamas's largest news site, we hacked into the phones and WhatsApp accounts of Hamas journalists, terrorists and senior Hamas officials and published databases of 40 million Iranians," says G. to Mako. "We blocked crypto accounts and websites for receiving funds that Hamas established, we closed a website for them that raised half a million dollars. We took down the website of the Hamas Employment Ministry and we will continue to act with a tough hand."

According to him, "We will continue to attack. We have a list of 200 very important sites for Hamas that we will not release until we disable them."

Does the government help you or do you work alone?

G: "The government doesn't help, because no one has a way to contact us. Right now I'm talking to you from a servant who sits on another country, purely because one of the managers asked, and we have enough money and tools to use it."

Did you give messages to Hamas?

"We gave a message to one of the journalists to stop publishing, otherwise we hack into his phone and WhatsApp, he did not respond to our requests and we attacked and stopped his activity. We are not giving a message to anyone anymore, we attack and stop activities that the SHABACH is unable to do."

This is not the only initiative by cyber experts to attack Hamas government websites, and there are different groups, isolated from each other, that operate in the field. "All the websites of Hamas and their supporters have fallen in recent days, and will fall again if the sites are brought back online," says one of the Israelis active on the issue.

And what about cyber attacks on Israel? At the beginning of the war, rumors were spread through the WhatsApp groups about a cyber attack on Israel, but the national cyber system emphasized that no such attack existed. Since then there have been attempts to break into Israeli websites, but no significant achievement has been recorded for Hamas on this level.

[On a personal note I cannot in any way verify or deny this, apart from it being on a large popular mass media outlet. BUT, the 8200 unit are the cyber intelligence of IDF and are highly regarded. A group of them formed a resistance to the current government and have been acting on that front for months. So it may be them or their colleagues]

#israel #war #cyber warfare #hackers #this is actually falls under vigilantism #HAMAS #@weredevils

3 notes · View notes

moneyreview2070 · 6 months

Text

The Importance of Understanding Stocks

Welcome to the thrilling world of stocks, where fortunes are made, dreams are shattered, and opportunities are limitless. This is not your run-of-the-mill finance lecture; it's a conversation about the Stock Market Basics you've been itching to understand.

Continue reading click here

#don’t miss out on this unique ea fc 24 stream with rap star p money #make money with affiliate marketing #send me money #pay me money #moneymanagement #old money #money slave #money #money manifestation #make money today #stock market #investing stocks #stocktrading #stockmarket #stocks news #stock trading

1 note · View note

dlorddarius · 7 months

Text

Unveiling the Secrets to TikTok Marketing Success

In the fast-paced world of social media, TikTok has emerged as a powerful platform for marketers to connect with a younger and highly engaged audience. With its short, engaging videos and virality, TikTok offers a unique opportunity to reach potential customers. However, success on TikTok doesn't happen by chance. To make the most of this platform, you need to unlock the secrets to TikTok marketing. In this blog, we'll reveal the key strategies that can help you achieve marketing success on TikTok.

Know Your Audience: Understanding your target audience is fundamental to any marketing strategy. On TikTok, this is even more critical due to the diversity of content and users. Research your audience's interests, demographics, and trending topics. Create content that resonates with them, and engage in trends that are relevant to your brand.

Authenticity Is Key: TikTok users value authenticity over perfection. Don't be afraid to show the human side of your brand. Authentic, relatable content often performs better than overly polished videos. Share behind-the-scenes glimpses, user-generated content, and real stories to build a genuine connection.

Leverage Hashtags: Hashtags are the lifeblood of TikTok. They help your content reach a broader audience. Utilize trending and relevant hashtags in your videos to increase visibility. Participating in challenges and trends can also boost your content's discoverability.

Creative and Engaging Content: TikTok is all about creativity and entertainment. Experiment with different video formats, styles, and trends. Use music, effects, and transitions to make your content stand out. Keep it concise, as TikTok videos are typically short. Grab the viewer's attention within the first few seconds.

Collaborate with Influencers: Collaborating with TikTok influencers can be a game-changer for your marketing efforts. Influencers have a loyal following, and their endorsement can significantly impact your brand's visibility. Choose influencers whose audience aligns with your target demographic.

Consistent Posting Schedule: Consistency is key on TikTok. Develop a posting schedule that aligns with your audience's active hours. Regular uploads keep your brand on the radar and help build a loyal following.

Engage with Your Audience: Respond to comments, messages, and engage with your audience. TikTok's algorithm favors content that fosters interaction. Encourage user-generated content, ask questions, and run contests to keep your audience engaged.

Monitor Analytics: TikTok provides valuable insights into your content's performance. Study these analytics to understand what works and what doesn't. Adjust your strategy based on this data to improve your marketing efforts.

Advertise on TikTok: Consider investing in TikTok ads. With options like in-feed ads, branded effects, and branded hashtags, you can reach a wider audience. TikTok ads are a great way to supplement your organic marketing efforts.

Stay Informed: The world of social media is ever-evolving. Stay updated with TikTok's latest features and trends. Attend webinars, follow TikTok news, and be open to adapting your strategy as the platform evolves.

Conclusion: TikTok marketing success is not shrouded in mystery; it's attainable with the right strategies. Understand your audience, create authentic and engaging content, collaborate with influencers, and use data to optimize your approach. By unlocking the secrets to TikTok marketing, you can harness the power of this platform to connect with your target audience and achieve your marketing goals.

Free Ebook to get started https://selar.co/p/e89694?affiliate=169y99

#make money online #tiktok trend #inktober 2023 #artfight 2023

2 notes · View notes