Tumgik
#Taiwan Blockade
dailynewsreporter · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
apas-95 · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
x
55 notes · View notes
taiwantalk · 3 days
Text
youtube
0 notes
at-the-end-of-days · 8 months
Text
It seems others are noticing.
Once again, grain of salt with anything you can't identify for yourself, but always up for debate/discussion.
youtube
Now, this was posted on 9/22/2023.
Frankly, while I don't know about a 6 month time frame or anything else, I do agree that I don't like how little media coverage there's been of China's actions, and I've discussed that previously.
But look at what came out just two days ago.
"A Chinese blockade of Taiwan would be a “monster risk” for Beijing and likely to fail, while a military invasion would be extremely difficult, senior Pentagon officials told the US Congress on Tuesday."
But why mention a blockade at all unless you think one is possible, likely, or at least suggested?
But look at what came out on August 1, 2023
It seems that either drills have been in the works for quite a while.. or China has had an ongoing idea about putting pressure on Taiwan for compliance.
"If there is a war over Taiwan, an extended Chinese blockade is likely to determine the outcome." From the U.S. Naval War College.
"
While a blockade might include intercepting ships at sea, the primary focus would be on sealing airfields and ports, particularly on the west coast of Taiwan. China could sustain that type of blockade indefinitely. Penetrating a prolonged blockade and keeping Taiwan alive would require a serious U.S. investment in systems and operational concepts that we currently do not have. Unless we make that investment, we may win the first battle, defeating an attempted landing. But we cannot win the war."
My point is... it's been considered. It's been considered, apparently, by a lot of people.
But whether China ENACTS that plan? Matters. When, matters. When Taiwan is about to have a big election year, much like the U.S. When the Chinese economy is faltering...
and the U.S. is ... ridiculously deep in debt?
I think it's a possibility.
0 notes
maqsoodyamani · 2 years
Text
نینسی پلوسی کے دورے کے بعد چین کی فوجی مشقیں، یہ ناکہ بندی ہے: تائیوان
نینسی پلوسی کے دورے کے بعد چین کی فوجی مشقیں، یہ ناکہ بندی ہے: تائیوان
نینسی پلوسی کے دورے کے بعد چین کی فوجی مشقیں، یہ ناکہ بندی ہے: تائیوان بیجنگ ، 4اگست ( آئی این ایس انڈیا ) تائیوان میں حکام نے اپنے جزائر کے قریب مشکوک ڈرونز کے اڑنے اور وزارت دفاع کی ویب سائٹ پر سائبر حملے کا دعویٰ کیا ہے۔خبر رساں ایجنسی روئٹرز کے مطابق جمعرات کو تائیوان کی وزارت دفاع نے یہ بیان امریکی ایوان نمائندگان کی اسپیکر نینسی پلوسی کے دورے کے ایک دن بعد دیا ہے جس سے چین سخت ناراض ہو گیا…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
phoenixyfriend · 3 months
Text
Calls for Action, Call Your Reps: 2/26/24
This is USA-specific, as that is the place I live and know.
Find your elected officials.
As usual, most of my information on what bills are on the floor comes from GovTrack. I am including some suggested listening/reading (you can find text versions if you google the title and 'transcript') at the bottom of the post. I am also including a current event that is likely to be a very powerful argument, with the right politicians. The event is prefaced with a red warning tag, and followed by event-specific verbiage.
Suggested verbiage and strategies for calling your elected officials.
GovTrack has said that there are still no votes scheduled, in this blog post from Friday: What's Next for Congress? (Feb 23, 2024)
In practice, that appears to mean that they are arguing over the budget to avoid yet another government shutdown. Given that the delays to the budget so far have been tied directly to the Israel/Ukraine/Taiwan military funding and Southern border.
Use this time to call their offices and tell them to vote the way you want them to.
The most immediate and pressing issue at this moment is the famine in Gaza. Widely reported today is that a two-month-old boy recently died of starvation, and the World Health Organization is declaring that it has become famine and a mass starvation event, no longer just a threat of one.
At this time, the three greatest factors in that famine are:
Israeli bombardment (destruction of existing food stores and farming land)
Israeli blockades of the Egyptian border into Gaza, preventing aid trucks from places like the US from reaching people
The cessation of funding to UNRWA, which has been the lifeline to Palestinian civilians for decades, and is currently the best and possibly only chance to save the one and a half million dying civilians
This information is being reported by the WHO, UNRWA itself, UNICEF, and more, along with journalists that are in Gaza at this time.
The other issue, more domestically, is the rising tide of concern for US Reproductive Rights stemming from the IVF ruling in Alabama.
Both House and Senate:
Reinstate funding for UNRWA. While the claims made by Israel that employees of the relief agency were involved in Oct. 7th are troubling, THEY are not well supported, and western officials did not do their duty in investigating the claims before cutting funding. This arm of the UN is currently providing food, water, shelter, and medical care to the 2.3 million displaced peoples of Gaza. It is especially disturbing and concerning that the many children of Gaza, who are already suffering due to this conflict, are now having this support revoked. Many sources are also claiming that the evidence is flimsy at best.
Urge both Senate and House to refrain from funding Israel, or to at least put some strings on it. The IDF cannot be given funding without some regulations on what they can do with it. They have proven that they are unwilling to take steps to protect civilians.
Sanctions must also be placed on Israel for its continued impediment of aid intended for Gazans, including aid from the US.
Urge for the US to stop vetoing ceasefire demands in the UN. No, the suggested replacement written by the US is not an excuse.
Not directly related to Gaza: It looks like they’re gearing up for another push at KOSA. The canned email responses I’m getting are really proud of being in support of KOSA, which is… bad. It is also bad for people outside the US, including Palestine, apparently. VOTE NAY.
Not related to Gaza: Alabama's recent court decision has put IVF services in danger in the state, with multiple fertility clinics halting all related services for any pregnancy that is not yet in progress; there were implantation appointments for last week that were canceled with no knowledge of when they might be greenlit. Push for full spectrum reproductive rights protection (fertility services, family planning, birth control, abortion, and more), and if you have a pro-lifer as your elected official, cite the Alabama ruling as a cause for concern of how the lack of codified reproductive rights protection can impact even those who do want children.
FOR THE SENATE: Urge your senator to put their support behind Bernie Sanders and his motion to restrict funding to Israel until a humanitarian review of the IDF’s actions in Gaza has been completed. Cite it as Senate Resolution 504 if your Senator is right-wing enough to react negatively to the mention of Sanders by name. NOTE: This resolution was TABLED by the Senate on 1/16, but it is being brought back in as conditions continue to escalate.
Passed in the House recently, so bother your senators about it, is H.R. 3016: IGO Anti-Boycott Act. Vote Nay. This appears to be intended to force US companies to do business with US allies instead of participating in boycotts. This appears, to me, to be an attack on movements like BDS. To Dem Reps, argue that this refuses the right of peaceful protest to US citizens. To Republican Reps, argue that this is a dangerous government overreach and that it is not the right of the government to force US citizens to purchase products and materials from specific foreign partners.
FOR THE HOUSE: Recommend that they support House Resolution 786, introduced by Rep. Cori Bush, Calling for an immediate deescalation and cease-fire in Israel and occupied Palestine. ALTERNATELY: Urge your representative to put their support behind Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s petition for the US government to recognize the IDF’s actions in Gaza as ethnic cleansing and forced displacement, and put a stop to it.
Alright, now the current big news story.
Warning: Self-harm, public suicide.
I will preface this with an explanation of a recent event.
The big American news of this week that is being talked about on all political news sources, from BBC to NPR to Al Jazeera, is the self-immolation in DC. A US Air Force service member walked to the Israeli embassy in Washingon DC, set up a Twitch Stream, and stated that he refused to be party to the genocide being committed with the support of his country's government. He then doused himself in a flammable liquid, set himself on fire, and shouted 'Free Palestine' on repeat until the fire grew too great for him to do anything but scream in pain. The man was rushed away to a hospital, but has apparently died since. Twitch has understandably removed the video for ToS violations, but the video has been saved and reshared to other sites since.
To be clear, the airman, a 25yo named Aaron Bushnell, explicitly stated that this was an act of extreme protest, but not as extreme as the current lives of Palestinians in Gaza. Please do not allow people to convince you this was just a random act of mental illness. It was tragic, yes, but this very public, recorded, in-uniform, motive-declared suicide was by all appearances a calculated choice based on centuries of precedent.
If your senator or representative claims to be pro-military, bring this up. Even if they don't, bring it up.
"A service member, someone who presumably has access to more information on what is happening 'on the ground' than the average citizen, someone who has proven their dedication to America, is dying in agony to prove a point: that Israel's actions cannot be condoned, cannot be justified, and most certainly cannot be supported with fourteen billion in military aid."
The above is one possible verbiage you can use when you call.
Today, I would also recommend listening to NPR's Politics Podcast as the episode contains some good information on The Michigan Problem, and the Democracy Now podcast, which has some good interviews on the confirmed famine going on in Gaza. I will note that there are some claims being made in the latter about the US government, including comments by Biden himself, using law enforcement and college administrations to punish pro-Palestine groups, from Students for Justice in Palestine to even Jewish Voice for Peace (notable since one of the major arguments for these actions is that anti-zionists are antisemitic). I am saying 'claims being made' as I have not had time to corroborate this with other news sources, and the other casts I listen to have not mentioned it.
If you wish to support my political blogging, I am accepting donations on ko-fi.
Alternately, I would also suggest that you send any spare money to PCRF (Palestine Children's Relief Fund), UNRWA, or Save the Children Sudan, which has been undergoing an incredibly deadly civil war for a year or so now, but that the US has significantly less involvement in on a bureaucratic level, so IDK what any of us in the US can do to help in that regard. But many of us do have money! So there's that.
70 notes · View notes
mariacallous · 2 months
Text
“I am opposed to war, unless in self-defense.” This was the most-liked comment on Douyin—the Chinese counterpart to TikTok—in reaction to a speech delivered by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Jan. 9. In his address, Wang previewed China’s top diplomatic goals for 2024 and emphasized “the unwavering resolve of all 1.4 billion Chinese citizens to achieve reunification with Taiwan,” a statement made just days prior to the island’s general elections.
The broader reaction to Wang’s remarks likely wasn’t what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hoped for: Tens of thousands of Chinese social media users responded, many of them with grievances, sarcasm, and defiance, widely questioning the costs of a potential war.
One man from Shanghai complained, “Who is going to fight the war? If I die, who is going to pay my mortgage or my car loan?” Wang’s speech framed “national unification” as one of “China’s core interests,” but as one user from Hunan rebutted, “[China’s] core interests are that every Chinese can be treated equally and have access to elderly care and health care.” The pushback went beyond economic and social grievances. Some posters were even bolder, suggesting that Taiwan’s democracy may demonstrate a political alternative to mainland China: “The fact that Taiwanese choose their own way of life,” said one commentator from Shandong, “might show that Chinese people can take a different route.”
The mood among social media users is a sharp departure from past elections. After almost every Taiwanese general election since 2016, a wave of pro-war fever has swept the Chinese internet. After Taiwan’s 2020 elections, for example, upbeat war enthusiasts in China produced oil paintings that illustrated wild fantasies of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) capturing Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen alive after landing in Taiwan and forcing her to sign an official surrender document onboard a Chinese aircraft carrier—a scene reminiscent of the 1945 Japanese surrender that ended World War II.
In 2021, one of the most popular songs to go viral on Chinese social media was “Take A Bullet Train to Taiwan in 2035.” Its allusion to a high-speed rail line connecting Beijing and Taipei was a dog whistle to nationalist masses who hoped that unification was on the horizon—by force, if necessary.
Absent from these fantasies, however, was the blood and violence that accompanies real war. At the time, China’s star was rising on the international stage, and public confidence was riding high on China’s success in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic within its borders. As such, the sentiments surrounding unification and the use of military force were quite romantic; many people believed that victory over Taiwan would be easy, that the Taiwanese would surrender voluntarily if the PLA simply blockaded the island.
In 2024, however, things have changed. The most recent Taiwanese presidential election—in which the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won a repeat victory—served as an uncomfortable reminder to the Chinese public that neither Taiwanese politicians nor voters are interested in Beijing’s plans for political unification. Although the forceful unification narrative still exists, any push from nationalists to reignite war fever has now run into a wall of skepticism following the DPP victory.
“Wake up,” one Weibo user wrote in opposition to the broader online calls for forceful unification. “Stop dreaming,” another echoed. The defiant voices are becoming a common reaction to the suggested use of military force to an extent rarely seen, given the massive culture of censorship on Chinese social media.
A clear reason for this change is China’s economic slowdown. While Taiwan went to the polls in 2024, China was grappling with a youth unemployment rate above 20 percent, a housing market crisis with sales down by 45 percent, and a stock market in free fall that lost $6 trillion in just three years, the likes of which haven’t been seen in almost a decade. News about Taiwanese elections failed to arouse the same nationalistic reactions among the preoccupied Chinese public that had occurred in the previous two contests.
Instead, the 2024 elections triggered a flood of complaints: “Sort out our own economy, what a mess.” a Shanghai resident said angrily. “Look at our stock market,” an apparently frustrated investor from Hunan grieved, “It’d be better to keep the status quo, and leave Taiwanese alone.” The gloomy economy has made some commenters question the underlying justification for war: “With low-income people making less than 1,000 yuan a month ($140), and the national insurance tax going up, huge medical bills, and unaffordable apartments, why do you want forceful unification? I don’t get it.”
“It is the economy that really matters,” another person from Tianjin pointed out. “[Taiwan] being independent or not has nothing to do with ordinary people.”
The changing attitudes toward Taiwan’s elections reflect a broader shift in public sentiment in China’s online space. Discontent about the country’s poor economic reality has been growing louder, drowning out calls for a military takeover.
Ironically, the CCP’s own past propaganda efforts contributed to this cooling effect. Right before Nancy Pelosi, then the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, visited Taiwan in August 2022, official and semiofficial rhetoric in mainland China was so belligerent that it led many Chinese to believe that the day of unification had finally arrived and that the military would shoot down her plane and launch its attack on Taiwan imminently.
This was the peak of forceful unification hysteria, but it only left its crusaders disappointed. In the end, there was not only no shootdown of Pelosi’s plane, but there also weren’t even military exercises conducted before she left Taiwan. Many Chinese, especially forceful unification advocates, felt betrayed and disillusioned by their government’s failure to follow through on its belligerent rhetoric, and the after-effects of this letdown are still being felt today.
During Taiwan’s 2024 elections, war enthusiasts were continuously reminded of Beijing’s military inaction following Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan. “Have you guys forgotten Pelosi?” one said. One commonly repeated joke, observing the lack of military action, scoffed that the only thing that was fired up when Pelosi visited was the stove in her hotel. The kinds of threats that once resonated with nationalists now drew widespread ridicule online: “delusion,” “talking a big game,” “an unrealistic fantasy,” and “all hat, no cattle.”
Meanwhile, at the other end of the Chinese political spectrum, the 2024 election prompted the resurgence of the view among many liberals that Taiwan’s democracy represents a desirable political model. In the early 2010s, many Chinese saw Taiwan as a beacon of hope for Chinese society—a liberal, civic, and democratic alternative to the one-party state. The liberal Chinese writer Han Han coined a popular phrase—“The most beautiful scenery of Taiwan is its people.”—that encapsulated the view of how trustworthy and free a people can become under democracy.
But after the crackdown on liberal intellectuals and online speech under Chinese leader Xi Jinping, the honeymoon did not last long and was gradually replaced by a climate of xenophobia, jingoism, war euphoria, and a longing for unification by force. Making matters worse, a growing nationalist mood in Taiwan led many to believe that Taiwanese looked down on mainlanders.
The 2024 elections, however, prompted a renewed interest from the Chinese public about their neighbor, home to the world’s only Chinese-speaking democracy. News about Taiwanese elections aroused great curiosity on Weibo about the nuts and bolts of the electoral process—what a ballot looks like, how many ballots one can cast, how votes are counted, and how candidates are selected. When a few Taiwanese Weibo users answered these questions, they were liked and retweeted by thousands of Chinese accounts, drawing genuine admiration and blessings from many.
“Are we going to see one day like this?” one user from Gansu wondered with a crying emoji. “Maybe this is accumulating experience for our own future: giving speeches, holding debates, and counting votes,” commented another, from Tianjin.
China’s shifting public sentiment is bound to have repercussions for cross-strait relations, but it would probably be a bridge too far to infer that the Chinese public will fiercely oppose a war in the Taiwan Strait. Ultimately, the nationalist base remains. At present, the euphoria about forceful unification is quieting down, mainly because the party’s over-the-top propaganda failed to meet the expectations of its most ardent supporters. But if aggressive rhetoric were followed by military action in the future, war fever could be easily fanned again.
Despite the prevalence of extreme nationalism, Chinese public opinion is more divided on Taiwan than it seems, and these divisions are only likely to increase. What concerns most ordinary Chinese are decent jobs, good income, accumulating savings for retirement, and getting affordable access to health care and housing.
So long as the economy is struggling and people’s livelihoods are threatened, there is no guarantee that the CCP’s attempts to exploit nationalism will work; quite the opposite, it could be faced with plenty of pushback.
20 notes · View notes
transboysokka · 5 days
Text
Taiwan update lol this should be a side blog at this point but I’m lazy
More “”military exercises”” from China, bigger scale/deal than 8/2022 because it’s definitely at least meant to look like they’re training for a blockade…
I do think it’s meant to be psychological as most things are BUT it’s important to note that IT IS TOO SOON AFTER THE INAUGURATION TO BE A REACTION TO PRESIDENT LAI’S “”INCENDIARY”” COMMENTS in his inaugural address (which by the way all he did was call Taiwan Taiwan)
I KNOW that’s what the media is going to say
My tin foil hat theory is that this is more likely about the legislative reform bill/protests, with more huge actions planned for tomorrow 5/24. It is kind of China’s MO to do shit like this to try to scare off the Taiwanese people, though in my experience it is likely that now more people will show up to protest
If you ARE in Taiwan there are actions happening all over the island today and tomorrow, and a huge turnout is expected again at the Legislative Yuan all day tomorrow. If you need help finding something near you lmk
I’ll be at the LY all morning but have a work event from 1200-2200, but will try to be back out after. There will likely be more protesting next Tuesday as well
This IS a huge deal. Please help spread awareness of what has been going on with this reform bill and protests. Taiwan’s democracy must be protected!!
My ask box is open to try and answer questions but if you support the CCP (or even KMT/TPP in this situation) please fuck off
12 notes · View notes
mapsontheweb · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
The Chinese military exercises “are tantamount to an air and sea blockade of Taiwan”, said General Yu Chien-chang, a senior official at the Taiwan’s defence ministry’s legal department. “They overlap with our territorial waters and airspace and severely violate our sovereignty.”
via @HoansSolo
269 notes · View notes
ireton · 4 days
Text
4 notes · View notes
zvaigzdelasas · 2 years
Text
5 Oct 22
96 notes · View notes
argumate · 1 year
Note
the one fun thing about if the PRC naval blockades Taiwan would be half of America comparing it to the Berlin Crisis and the other half comparing it to the Cuban embargo.
Taiwan is just China's Cuba, yes
30 notes · View notes
taiwantalk · 9 months
Text
There! That’s a rehearsal blockade. China is rehearsing blockade to be later applied to Taiwan. guarantee that china is going to increase the ships with small boats to fill the gap and just have 4 coast guard ships aiming to fire as soon as the little boats are rammed or capsized.
The situation is imminent. Philippine and Taiwan must jointly develop naval strategies with aerial support and be ready for chinese escalation to missile warfare.
Philippine must not just have 2 coast guard ship unprepared for attack. China is rehearsing and staging and Philippine needs to reach out to all the southeast Asian countries to get support.
6 notes · View notes
paktderpakte · 7 months
Text
Last Flight
The moonlit sea slid by beneath the two Meteors. It felt to Collins like they hadn't seen anyone for hours, but they didn't have that kind of flight time. Every so often the crippled engine sputtered, he felt the plane slow, watched the altimeter bleed the height he was trying to save for the glide, precious feet slipping into the sea like his fuel.
youtube
He and Davies had gamed it out on their channel together in the first few minutes after they escaped the blockade, trying to weigh their options and what might have happened on the Island, what might have happened to the relief fleet, where they might go now. Even on a full tank they'd never make it to Papua. Illustrious had to be somewhere in the Philippine Sea, that was certain, far out of reach dueling with Kaga-- or else she and her escort were simply sunk. Flying to her, they would run out of fuel somewhere south of Taiwan and get shot down by Japanese patrols.
The only thing for it, they had decided, was the Philippines. The Americans might throw them in jail, might hand them over to the Japanese, but then they might not. Assuming no leaks, they would run out of fuel a few kilometers north of Luzon, and then they could drift in, make a belly landing on some beach or even land on an airstrip if they could make contact with someone.
It was about the best plan they were going to get.
Speaking of making contact, he decided to try again, flicking his comms to the distress channel for ships. He took a moment to steady himself, then spoke.
"Mayday, mayday, emergency. Survivors from the siege of Hong Kong flying southeast, bearing 1-3-0 toward Luzon. Insufficient fuel to reach land; engines damaged. If any League of Nations or friendly ships are receiving this transmission, please respond. Repeat, emergency, crippled RAF fighters request assistance, en route from Hong Kong to Manila, running out of fuel. Please."
Tenser than ever, he listened for a response. Static. Listened some more, hoping to catch some semblance of speech in the static, and nearly jumped with excitement to hear a human voice until he realized it was Badger. "We might get some shipping traffic, but that's it," he commented, not chastising his friend so much as commiserating. "And it'll probably be Japs."
"I know. Right now-- if I spoke it well enough I might ask them for help too."
"They'd shoot us."
"Maybe." They flew on.
The comment stuck in Collins' mind more than he liked. He thought of Campbell, stumbling back to the Island…the rest of the squadron, left behind, surrendering to the IJA. Would they be shot? Sent off to a prison camp in the interior?
"We wouldn't have to worry about it if Control had done its job." Badger broke his despairing reverie, and anger flared to replace it. This was all down to command incompetence-- incompetence or malice. His fist clenched against the lever thinking of it for the first time since they'd fled. Shattered wrecks strewn on the airstrip at Von Seeckt with his comrades still inside, James' plane blossoming into a ball of fire, Parker sinking under the waves.
He hated that bitch in the red planes. Sylvie Dorn. He had read her file over and over in the brig, burned her face into his memory. He didn't care what Jaeger was like, that he seemed to have a shred of honor-- he had a murderer in his command staff, as far as Collins was concerned, and she would pay for it.
But she only killed James, didn't she.
Adlai. He'd made them stick it out over Guangzhou, he'd refused to send them more fighters over Hong Kong, kept the ceasefire from them too.
He'd killed them all.
He'd pay for it too.
Not that Collins told Badger any of that. His wingman would never rat on him intentionally, but they'd probably be questioned, and having murderous intent toward your former air controller would raise red flags. He just took a breath, tried to calm himself, let the death grip release. "Yeah," he finally radioed back. "They really fucked up bad."
"…anyway. How's your fuel?" Better to get back on survival.
"Little more'n forty. I don't think my fuel lines got hit-- the black squadron's commander, I charged him and it spooked'em. I'll probably make it over land."
Though he couldn't see it, Collins shook his head. "Yeah, you're doing better than me. And that wasn't their commander. It was a stand-in. Whoever it was probably wasn't used to leading so many planes."
"Eh? 'ow you know? Maybe he was just off 'is game."
"Because the black squadron is the first of their wing. Schwarze," he muttered it like a curse. "Their commander was the thief who stole my plane."
Davies whistled. "One 'ell of a trophy. Pilots are a mess without a commander, they teach the Russians that, they say. Kill the head of the snake and the rest falls apart."
"…I hope Temple is having a better time of it than that," Collins finally said, after a long silence. They could see the island at this point, black against the black sky, and yet-- Badger was doing much better than him. Twenty gallons in his tank would be generous, and as Collins stared at the fuel gauge it seemed to drop visibly, ticking away his life, ticking away the time Temple Squadron had a deserter for a commander instead of a dead commander.
The broken engine sputtered again, the airframe shook around him, he sank a few dozen more feet. "I might make it with the glide, but I might have to ditch in the water. We'll see."
"Right."
He made another distress call, but the two pilots didn't say much more to each other. Even when the engine 'ran,' now, it didn't want to put out the same kind of thrust. The speed indicator kept dropping, the altitude indicator, the fuel indicator, all ticking down, grains of sand in an hourglass as Luzon crawled closer.
Maybe thirty klicks out, the pierced engine stopped for good, then the other a few moments later, as the last of the fuel burned up or dripped into the sea. "Fucker. I'm out. I think there's a beach…a little south of our bearing?"
Badger took a deep breath on comms, steeling himself. "I see it. Are you going to try and ditch there?"
"No better options, are there?"
"No." The second pilot hesitated. "I'll bring help back. I still have a ways left to go."
"Yeah. You've been gimping your speed to stay with me too."
The less-damaged plane and its pilot separated from Collins, and started to accelerate, banking away to the south where the lights of a city gleamed. "I'll be back. Really. Even if you're dead I'll be back."
Collins didn't respond. And now he was alone. No men to protect, just his own skin.
They'd practiced engine-out landings, but this wasn't that, there was no runway. He was just falling out of the sky. He pulled the plane into a glide configuration, didn't bother but to glance at the altimeter now, just watched the sea and the strip of sand loom up to meet him. He wasn't going to make it. There would be no leaving a trail screaming onto the beach, he was going to skip across the water like a rock and his plane would shatter and sink and none of them would know what happened to him. God.
An instant before his borrowed Meteor hit the waves, Collins wondered if Davies would make it to an airstrip. The last thing he saw before he blacked out was the canopy splintering from the impact.
2 notes · View notes
at-the-end-of-days · 9 months
Text
An update on the Chinese military situation around Taiwan
Now, much of this I was unable to verify myself.
youtube
Skip to the 11:00 mark
But according to the above stated video, Korea has deployed naval and air assets, as has Japan as of 9/15/2023
Taiwan has supposedly asked the Philippines to deploy naval assets
Now what I did find?
Canada has sent A third of the Royal Canadian Navy's entire Pacific frigate fleet to Japan. Mind you, that's just two vessels.
The US does have the USS Ronald Reagan in port in Japan at the moment
But as far as there is a Chinese “exercise” surrounding Taiwan at the moment that is going vastly unreported?
A search on the internet only pulls up such activity from April 8th, 9th, 10th of this year. So far as any language goes about “encircling” Taiwan.
But “major exercise” pulls up what’s going on currently in September of 2023.
Under a “current activities” tab, there’s an article from 2022, clearly out of date in regard to the Chinese navy.
The New York Times also reports a much different number of ships to the number announced in the video.
Now while I still hold hesitations to say that this is anything other than what’s being reported? How it’s reported, the language, the availability of information is striking to me. The far less inflammatory language compared to April despite the supposed size of the operation.
And let’s say that it is all that it is purported to be.
“The drills, which appear to simulate a blockade of Taiwan, are believed to be in response to recent military drills between the United States and allies.”
It’s not exactly the most calming thought that Chinese forces are simulating a blockade as a show of force.
Or how little is being reported on it.
2 notes · View notes
warsofasoiaf · 2 years
Note
Why do people keep assuming that in the event of war breaking out before 2045, the PRC would go for a Normal Invasion of Taiwan when its risky and suicidal? For your consideration, here's some ideas that both Taiwan News and SCMP have said they consider more likely
1. Occupation of the Smaller more pro CCP islands.
2. Bombing via ballistic missiles and drones.
3. Naval Blockade
4. All Out Cyberwar
5. Economic Sanctions
From what I can tell these methods are more likely according to the experts because they are supposed to be more subtle and less costly in comparison to a invasion and occupation. What do you think?
They believe it due to Xi Jinping's increasing bellicosity toward Taiwan and the world at large, the chilling of cross-Strait relations, the large missile demonstrations in response to the CODEL visit, and the statements that said that Taiwan's reunification with the PRC are inevitable. It's not an unreasonable assumption that if Taiwan refuses diplomatic reunification, the PRC may resort to force.
Missile and drone strikes are likely to invite sanctions and reprisal attacks, which would in turn ratchet up the aggression very quickly, particularly if Taiwan enjoys considerable allied support.
A naval blockade would likely force a US Navy Freedom of Navigation operation, in which case the PLAN either has to back down or attack, starting a full throated war.
Economic sanctions are likely to invoke reciprocal sanctions, which will hurt China significantly. As it stands right now, China is a hugely import-dependent economy. Sanctions would also severely constrict the world economy, hurting everyone including China.
Occupation of pro-CCP islands could easily kick off a war, especially if that occupation leads to violence against Taiwanese government personnel.
Of them, cyber attacks seem the least escalatory, but again, it's likely to invite sanctions, so I'd see it as similar to economic sanctions.
So it's possible that those actions are more likely, but it's also possible that these would the precursors to a war.
Thanks for the question, Midwest.
SomethingLikeALawyer, Hand of the King
13 notes · View notes