Holding All The Cards
Ok, so...
Anyone that's known me for more than 30 seconds knows I like playing with tarot cards. I've been doing it since I was.... I don't even remember how old I was but let's say 20. That's close enough. I know I was barely over 18 but I WAS over.
I'm not the best reader out there, and compared to some of the pros, I really suck. But I enjoy doing it anyway and usually do it for free. But what I DON'T do is (intentionally) cold read. It probably happens by accident but I actively try not to do it.
And I'm about to piss off a LOT of other readers with what I'm about to say but... there's no actual magic involved in tarot reading. You don't have to have psychic mind powers (although it would probably help) and the only thing all the rules and rituals are good for is to get you into a good mindspace TO read.
I often talk about how my decks "talk" to me and each one has it's own personality, and that makes me sound crazier than I (admit) that I really am. The REAL process is a bit more mundane, and a tarot reading is a cooperation between the reader and the sitter.
Let's say I agree to do a reading for you. I have never met you, never talked to you before, I don't even know your name. I personally like to have A name to focus on because it helps my mental process, but it's not vitally important.
Either you or I shuffle the cards and then I lay them out. (I personally don't do the Choose A Card method, some people do) If I'm doing a spread, each placement has a meaning. It could be a simple Past Present Future or it could ask something more specific Forces Working For/Against Me etc. Each card has a name and pictures on it. The pictures are symbolic and the name has keywords attached to it.
So for this example, let's say that I'm only pulling one card. "Why can't I find a boyfriend." 3 of swords.
The key words for the Three of Swords are things like Heartbreak, Love Triangle, Heartburn, yadda yadda. So when I look at all of these things connected, images and emotions form in my head. It's pure imagination.
Why can't you find a boyfriend? You're picking the wrong type of guy. You're still hurting for a past boyfriend who did some dirty dealings and you haven't completely gotten over him yet. You're also not being open with yourself or potential partners. Your emotions are muted or locked away. You need to work on yourself before you can attract a quality guy.
Does this mean I know about your ex Travis who slept with your sister? Not at all. Not even an inkling. Do I know that you've dated a string of cheating losers since then or that your last ex wanted an open relationship? Never crossed my mind. But YOU do. So you have to take what *I* just said and apply it to yourself.
Wow, you HAVE been chasing a bunch of "bad boys" because they reminded you of Travis. You HAVE been holding back because you're afraid of being hurt again. You HAVE been spending too much time crying into your Ben & Jerry's. Maybe you should look into therapy or do some other form of self improvement.
But because of the way the human mind works, you now start thinking "Oh wow! That was SO relevant to me and specifically me! This person must have some sort of special ability! They don't even know what I look like, how would they know that was the EXACT answer I needed?"
Cold readers are even worse. You can google what that is if you don't know.
I don't have any special abilities no one else has. I'm just really good at weaving a narrative from the clues I'm given. You fill in the gaps. It's honestly that simple and any honest reader who doesn't huff their own incense will tell you the same thing.
But this is basically a magician explaining the slight of hand behind the trick, so this is not a popular explanation. "Well just because YOU don't have a genuine gift doesn't mean NO ONE does!!"
Sure, I'll give you that. I'm just open minded enough to say that it is COMPLETELY POSSIBLE that there really is someone out there who has a genuine psychic ability. But no one ever claimed Randi's million dollars so the vast majority (if not all) of these people who say there's all these rules and rituals and supernatural components are hyped up on their own self importance, WAY too superstitious, or straight up lying to you.
1 note
·
View note
My oldest kid STRUGGLED with learning to read - part of this is that Covid started when she was in kindergarten and distance learning was an unmitigated nightmare, so she pretty much lost any momentum she'd had and took most of first grade to catch back up. It was really only when my sister in law got her a Captain Underpants book for Christmas when she was seven that she was suddenly like, oh! this can be fun! and took off with it.
My younger kid, on the other hand, just sat down and read me an entire book, out loud, barely stumbling over sounding out three- and four-syllable words. He's five; this is well beyond what they're practicing in school. He just... learned how letters make sounds and instinctively picked the rest up. The contrast is wild.
55 notes
·
View notes
Thoughts about Rogue Trader so far:
Well that sure was the fastest promotion I've ever gotten. xD I'm kinda sad about it, I was hoping for a mean space mom, but I'll take it.
I like the characters so far! Although Abelard does not appear as space dad either for now, but that's alright he's still cool. As are Indira and Argentum.
I am a bit confused by the gameplay and am uncertain how much of that is just Warhammer things I don't get or strange choices. I'm sure the "wounds" label probably comes from ttp so whatever, but the fact the whole characteristics and skills thing seems a bit unbalanced to me for now considering that Int controlls nearly half of all skills alone. But maybe I'll know better once I've gotten a better handle of it. It just seems unintuitive as a whole right now. I like the combat though! Might turn the difficulty a bit higher even, I'd like to get a bit more of a challenge I think. (That said, story mode does do what it's supposed to. It should be extremely easy, I just changed my mind on what I want) Still somewhat confusing like the hologram thing I think might not entirely work as intended but I'll get a handle on it.
Main criticism for now: This game is badly optimizied. Apparently that is a notorious Unity sin so I won't blame them too much, but I do hope they'll patch it soon, this game should not make my cooler run louder than BG3. Turning off v-synch and putting a lower fps cap has helped for now, but come on.
11 notes
·
View notes
Hi! Um, any tips on how to color/shade?
-Because i am beyond terrible at it
m..me?? cooouring? i mean. i hate colouring so much that i flat-col the minimum for character recognition and call it done
if i absolutely HAvE to shade something . i'll use the :shrug: shortcut of starting with the base colour, then tweaking the Saturation/Lightness bars:
-shadow: lower saturation and lightness
-light: whatever saturation, higher lightness
if the character is somewhere with a distinct colour theme, i'll try to shift the base/shadows/lights to that colour.
likewise if there's a distinct coloured light source, i'll make the light on the char similar to that source
imagine me sitting on one section of the colour wheel. and walking toward the destination colour. just picking up colours in between. idk how legit it is, but i'm doing it
sometimes i'll be all srs and try detailed light/shadows but. it ends up makin my drawing too busy. a mess.
CORRECT: try to replicate that light source IRL or thru reference so u can figure out why it looks wrong, then correct your placements
INCORRECT, BECAUSE I'M LAZY: do a simple shape-based cel shade and let the audience's brain finish the job 😂
also i try not to use pure black or pure white for shading. i used to paint the night sky as 100% (zero lightness) black and the moon as 100% (ALL LIGHTNESS) white and my instructor wanted to fling me out a window. i could see it in their eyes. as they gently explained how IRL conditions are rarely 100% black or 100% white. maybe the night sky, depending on the conditions,, (if u actually colour drop a photo) is like 9% lightness with a tinge of blue. the moon is 96% lightness tinged orange. idk
11 notes
·
View notes
new and edited version of the list of anthems I know the lyrics of by now:
‘know’ means I could properly sing it with everyone at a sporting event - so for most of them it’s just the first verse and chorus.
* means I know more than that
() means it’s a dependency/territory so not technically a ‘national’ anthem
I’ll also count anthems that don’t have official lyrics if I can whistle them in full
Germany
UK
France
Italy
Canada (both English and French)
Austria
Switzerland (only German)
Uruguay*
Belgium (only French)
(Aruba)*
Spain
Australia
Aotearoa (both English and Te Reo)
Sweden
Finland (only Finnish)
Iceland
Denmark
Norway
(French Polynesia)
Liechtenstein
(Guernsey)
(Scotland)*
Brazil*
Ghana
Mexico
Cuba
(Wales)*
Monaco
Togo
Japan
Haiti*
Jamaica*
Nigeria
Portugal
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Papua New Guinea
(US Virgin Islands)
Fiji
Namibia
South Africa
Argentina*
Mauritius
Chile
Central African Republic
Nepal
Czechia
Slovakia
Albania
Netherlands
Slovenia
Croatia
Romania
Serbia
Hungary
Ukraine
Poland
16 notes
·
View notes
Certain tumblr anti-vegans say they don't see the point of veganism because animals and plants are both alive and have equal moral value to them, and there could maybe be a cogent position there, except... do any of these people actually see it that way in practice?
Do they consider joking about accidentally killing all your houseplants morally equivalent to joking about adopting puppies and then neglecting them to death?
Do they see kids who dismember insects for fun as morally equivalent to kids who make daisy chains for fun?
Maybe they do, far be it from me to disbelieve people who say they hold fringe positions, but most of these people don't seem that fringe in how they approach living beings, so I do wonder.
51 notes
·
View notes
I have a new zest for category theory! by going through a couple of very basic proofs with attention to how I was thinking, I think I identified part of what was making it frictional in my brain.
weirdly (in part) I had the intuition for composing arrows, but not decomposing arrows. that is, my brain and intuition had internalized how you could have f : a -> b and g : b -> c and get gf, but not how you could start with h : a -> c and be on the lookout for factorizations of h through some such f, g.
which is kind of odd, right? I mean, aren't these just the same fact? well, yes, but they're not necessarily regarded as the same by your intuition! it's a reminder of how brains (and, more generally, "implementations" of math, such as in a proof assistant) need not expose the parts of the math that actually drive its use, but only "incidentally" allow the important parts to happen. I mean, I was perfectly fine seeing some such h be decomposed in a proof, and even doing it myself as an incidental step in a proof, but I realized I hadn't indexed it as a fundamental part of how categories(/categorical proofs) work for ready application.
and that's what intuition is, really: not the stuff you understand per se, but the mental processes that are "at hand", that are "active" or "triggerable" in your brain when you're thinking about something.
(by the way: the other part of re-developing fundamental parts of my intuition here was realizing that I can intuitivize(? not intuit, that means something else...) universal properties the same way I intuitivize unique factorization theorems.)
4 notes
·
View notes