#Global Crop Protection Market | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

crop-protection-market · 26 days

Text

Market Segmentation and Regional Analysis in the Crop Protection Industry

The crop protection market is diverse and complex, with a wide range of products, technologies, and applications catering to different crops and regions. In this blog, we will explore the market segmentation and regional dynamics of the crop protection industry, providing insights into key market trends and opportunities.

Market Segmentation:

The Crop Protection Market can be segmented based on product type, crop type, application method, and mode of action. Major product categories include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and biopesticides, each targeting specific pests, diseases, and weeds. Crop protection products are used across various crop categories, including cereals, fruits, vegetables, and oilseeds.

Regional Analysis:

The global crop protection market is geographically diverse, with different regions exhibiting varying market dynamics and growth potentials. Some of the key regions driving market growth include:

North America: North America is a significant market for crop protection products, driven by extensive agricultural land, advanced farming practices, and high adoption of biotechnology. The United States and Canada are major contributors to market growth, with a strong focus on innovation and technology adoption.

Europe: Europe is another prominent market for crop protection products, characterized by stringent regulatory frameworks and increasing demand for sustainable agriculture solutions. The European Union has strict regulations governing pesticide use, driving the adoption of biological and organic alternatives.

Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth in the crop protection market, fueled by population growth, urbanization, and increasing food demand. Countries such as China, India, and Australia are key contributors to market expansion, with a growing focus on improving crop yields and quality.

Latin America: Latin America is a major agricultural hub, known for its large-scale production of crops such as soybeans, corn, and sugarcane. Brazil and Argentina are key markets for crop protection products, driven by extensive cropland and favorable climatic conditions.

Key Market Trends:

Shift Towards Biologicals: There is a growing trend towards the use of biological crop protection products in response to consumer demand for safer and more sustainable agricultural practices. Biopesticides, biofertilizers, and microbial-based solutions are gaining popularity as alternatives to synthetic chemicals.

Digitalization and Precision Agriculture: Digital farming technologies are transforming crop protection practices, enabling farmers to monitor fields, detect pest infestations, and optimize inputs more efficiently. Sensors, drones, and satellite imagery provide real-time data for precision application of crop protection products.

Sustainable Agriculture Initiatives: Sustainability is a key focus area in the crop protection industry, with companies and policymakers promoting eco-friendly solutions and conservation practices. Integrated pest management (IPM), organic farming, and agroecological approaches are gaining traction as sustainable alternatives to conventional crop protection methods.

Opportunities and Challenges:

The Crop Protection Market presents numerous opportunities for innovation, collaboration, and market expansion. However, it also faces challenges such as regulatory constraints, resistance issues, and environmental concerns. Companies that invest in research and development, develop sustainable solutions, and adapt to changing market dynamics can succeed in this competitive landscape.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the crop protection market is dynamic and evolving, driven by changing consumer preferences, technological advancements, and sustainability imperatives. Understanding market segmentation and regional dynamics is essential for stakeholders to identify growth opportunities, navigate regulatory challenges, and capitalize on emerging market trends. By staying informed and proactive, companies can position themselves for success and contribute to sustainable agriculture practices globally.

0 notes

marketsandatablog · 2 months

Text

Global crop protection chemicals market is projected to witness a CAGR of 4.3% during the forecast period 2024-2031, growing from USD 70.31 billion in 2023 to USD 98.62 billion in 2031.

#Global crop protection chemicals market

0 notes

medicaldevicesindustrynews · 6 months

Text

Sustainable Farming: Navigating Trends in the Agricultural Lubricants Market

The agricultural lubricants market will touch USD 4,332.8 million, growing at a 4.1% compound annual growth rate, by 2030. The growth of this industry is because of the rising modern farming practices, the growing need to enhance crop yield, and the mechanization of agricultural procedures. Furthermore, the requirement for farming activities-related products are likely to surge at a rapid rate…

View On WordPress

#agricultural lubricants #bio-based lubricants #crop protection equipment #farming practices #global market outlook #lubricant formulations #machinery maintenance #Market dynamics #market trends #precision farming #research and development #sustainable agriculture

0 notes

cmibloggers · 1 year

Text

Agrochemicals have played a crucial role in modern agriculture, significantly transforming the way we produce food. Read More: https://cmibloggers.blogspot.com/2023/06/the-impact-of-agrochemicals-on-crop.html

#Coherent Market Insights #Chemical and Materials Industry #Agrochemicals #global agrochemicals market #Pesticides #Fertilizers #Crop protection #Soil health #Pest management

0 notes

probablyasocialecologist · 10 months

Text

Agricultural production is worth protecting; food and fiber are too important to be subject to the increasingly cruel vagaries of the weather and global trade. But as it stands, the [Federal Crop Insurance Program] is maladapted to the challenges of our modern world, where places like Arizona are routinely smashing through high heat records and water in the West is becoming increasingly scarce. While home insurers like State Farm are pulling out of California and Florida due to the mounting costs of climate disasters, the FCIP is doing the opposite: insulating farmers from the true cost of doing business. The average return for home and auto policies is about 60 cents per dollar spent on premiums. Farmers receive an average of $2.22 for every dollar they put into crop insurance. As a result, between 2000 and 2016, farming businesses—mostly large ones—collectively pocketed $65 billion more in claim payments than they paid in premiums. They were paid to plant crops that never came to market.

#agriculture #farming #usa #big ag #crop insurance #Arizona

218 notes · View notes

kp777 · 9 months

Text

By Ralph Nader

Common Dreams Opinion

Sept. 9, 2023

Our national charter needs amending to deal with big corporations, which in turn requires a mass movement.

The headlines on climate catastrophes are becoming more informative as they become more ominous. For years the media headlines have been describing record floods, droughts, wildfires, heatwaves, hurricanes and other fossil-fueled disasters of an abused Mother Nature. The immediate human casualties are devastating.

Very recently, the headlines have been steering us toward what happens in the aftermath of natural disasters in afflicted regions around the world.

The Washington Post yesterday front-paged a huge headline “Climate-Linked Ills Threaten Humanity,” followed by the sub-headline: “Pakistan is the epicenter of a global wave of climate health threats.” The reporters opened their long analysis with almost biblical language: “The floods came, and then the sickness.”

The record heat wave and flooding that left one-third of Pakistan under water have unleashed “dark clouds of mosquitoes” spreading malaria. Food supplies were reduced by drenched fields unable to grow crops. The article depicted a world map with color-coded measures of dangerous heat waves. The Indian sub-continent is registered as having one of the longest annual heat-intense periods. Over 40 million Pakistanis will endure dangerous heat for over six months a year “unless they can find shade… Extreme heat, which causes heatstroke and damages the heart and kidneys” is just one consequence.

Our Constitution never once mentions “corporation” or “company” – it only speaks of “We the People” and “persons.”

Dengue fever surged in Peru. Canadian wildfires poured smoke and particulates into the U.S. triggering asthma attacks. Famine lurks in East Africa’s worst drought in 40 years, while contaminated water takes its toll on many diseases, especially horrifying for infants and young children.

Another consequence recorded by the Post with the headline “Amid Record Heat, Even Indoor Factory Workers Enter Dangerous Terrain” in Asia. Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, led by Dr. Sidney Wolfe, was a pioneer in petitioning OSHA to issue regulations to protect workers against extreme heat (See: https://www.citizen.org/topic/heat-stress/). Corporate OSHA stalled. Then the Biden Administration proposed modest regulations that are facing corporate opposition and years of delay by corporate attorneys.

Until overturned by a Texas court, Governor Greg Abbott overrode some ordinances that were passed in large Texas cities requiring drinking water breaks for construction workers laboring under 100-degree temperatures.

Abbott, arguably the cruelest governor in the United States – unless Florida Governor Ron DeSantis out-snarls him – thought he could get away with this bit of brutishness. After all, he is in Texas, where the oil and gas lobby (Exxon Mobil Et al.) is pushing to increase North American exploration, production, and burning of these well-documented omnicidal sources of global warming and climate violence.

The oil, gas and coal industry’s tentacles have encircled a majority of the 535 lawmakers in Congress to shield and maintain huge tax subsidies behind the industry’s lethal drive for increased production. Its marketeers see their profitable circular death dance intensify as hotter days lead to higher air conditioning loads.

Running berserk with their bulging profits, these giant energy companies worldwide are forging a suicide pact with an abused Mother Earth. The projections for what climate eruptions will do to humans and the natural world continue to be underestimated. The realities each year exceed scientists’ predictive models.

With no other driving value system than short-term profits, these artificial entities or companies, and corporations controlling different dangerous technologies, cannot be allowed equal justice under the law with real human beings driven by other far more important life-sustaining and morally enhancing values. For over 2000 years, every major religion has warned about subordination by the merchant class of civilized values. The great “soft energy” or renewable energy prophet and physicist, Amory Lovins, put this critical declaration in modern, secular language when he wrote: “Markets make good servants, but bad masters.”

Our Constitution never once mentions “corporation” or “company” – it only speaks of “We the People” and “persons.” Our national charter needs amending to deal with big corporations, which in turn requires a mass movement. Since ravaging corporations impact people with indiscriminate harm, not caring whether the victims are liberals or conservatives, the political prospect for a decisive left/right coalition is as auspicious as ever.

Tens of millions of hard-pressed American workers have given up on themselves securing a government that works for them, instead of for short-sighted, greedy corporations.

The pressure for such a coalition is growing daily. Insurance companies, citing climate disaster claims, are skyrocketing homeowners and auto insurance premiums, or worse, either redlining areas or altogether pulling out of some states such as Florida. Some coastal areas will soon be private insurance deserts, requiring entry by state-run insurance coverage, at least for reinsurance purposes.

Overpaid insurance company CEOs are starting to demand bailouts without even guaranteeing coverage for consumers.

Faster and faster, the second, third and fourth waves of after-effects of these man-made natural disasters will become all-enveloping punishers of societies that are failing to head off the looming dangers, now maturing into evermore desperate states of living.

On Capitol Hill, a domestically paralyzed Congress only comes together every year to hoopla its bipartisan mega-billion-dollar additions to the bloated, unaudited Pentagon budget – taking over half of the entire federal government’s operating budget. Congress regularly gives the Generals more than they request.

Meanwhile, back home, tens of millions of hard-pressed American workers have given up on themselves securing a government that works for them, instead of for short-sighted, greedy corporations. These Americans continue to ignore the historically validated truth – no more than one active percent of the citizenry, representing the majority public opinion, can quickly make a large majority of those 535 Congressional Senators and Representatives fight first and foremost for the public interest.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely. RALPH NADER Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate and the author of "The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future" (2012). His new book is, "Wrecking America: How Trump's Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All" (2020, co-authored with Mark Green).

Full Bio >

#climate crisis #climate emergency #climate change #fossil fuels #u.s. constitution #corporate power #corporate greed #ralph nader

41 notes · View notes

book-my-crop · 4 months

Text

Maximizing Your Profits: Castor Price Trends in Gandhinagar, Surendranagar, and Kheda.

Today, we'll delve into the dynamic world of castor price trends in three key regions: Gandhinagar, Surendranagar, and Kheda. Whether you're a seasoned trader or a novice investor, understanding the fluctuations in castor prices is essential for maximizing your profits. Let's explore the factors influencing these trends and how you can stay ahead of the game.

Understanding Castor Price Dynamics:

Castor, known for its versatility and various industrial applications, is a significant agricultural commodity.

Price fluctuations are influenced by factors such as demand-supply dynamics, geopolitical events, weather conditions, and global economic trends.

Gandhinagar, Surendranagar, and Kheda are prominent regions for castor cultivation in India, contributing significantly to the market.

Key Factors Influencing Castor Prices: a.Demand from Industrial Sectors: Analyze the demand for castor oil and derivatives in industries such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and manufacturing. b. Supply Chain Dynamics: Assess the impact of crop yields, harvesting seasons, and transportation costs on supply levels. c. Global Market Trends: Stay informed about international market dynamics and their ripple effects on local prices. d. Government Policies: Understand how agricultural policies and subsidies affect castor cultivation and pricing.

Castor Price Trends in Gandhinagar, Surendranagar, and Kheda: a. Historical Analysis: Examine past price movements to identify seasonal patterns and long-term trends. b. Current Market Scenario: Provide real-time updates on castor prices in these regions, including recent fluctuations and market sentiment. c. Future Projections: Offer insights into anticipated price trends based on market forecasts and expert analysis.

Strategies for Maximizing Profits: a. Timely Market Analysis: Utilize tools and resources to track castor price movements and identify favorable buying or selling opportunities. b. Risk Management: Implement hedging strategies to mitigate the impact of price volatility and protect your investments. c. Diversification: Explore diverse investment options within the agricultural sector to spread risk and optimize returns. d. Relationship Building: Cultivate strong partnerships with farmers, traders, and industry experts to gain valuable market insights and opportunities.

Conclusion: In conclusion, staying informed about castor price trends in Gandhinagar, Surendranagar, and Kheda is essential for making informed decisions and maximizing your profits in the agricultural market. By understanding the underlying factors influencing prices and implementing strategic approaches, you can navigate market uncertainties with confidence. Stay tuned to Book My Crop for regular updates and expert insights into the dynamic world of agricultural trading. Happy trading!

#Castor Divela price in gandhinagar #Castor price in Surendranagar #Castor price in kheda

5 notes · View notes

dontmeantobepoliticalbut · 11 months

Text

In rural Arizona’s La Paz County, on the state’s rugged border with California, the decision by a Saudi-owned dairy company to grow alfalfa in the American Southwest for livestock in the Gulf kingdom first raised eyebrows nearly a decade ago. Now, worsening drought has focused new attention on the company and whether Arizona should be doing more to protect its groundwater resources.

Amid a broader investigation by the state attorney general, Arizona last week rescinded a pair of permits that would have allowed Fondomonte Arizona, a subsidiary of Almarai Co., to drill more than 1,000 feet (305 meters) into the water table to pump up to 3,000 gallons (11 kiloliters) of water per minute to irrigate its forage crops.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Attorney General Kris Mayes said she thought most Arizonans see it as “outrageous” that the state is allowing foreign-owned companies “to stick a straw in our ground and use our water for free to grow alfalfa and send it home to Saudi Arabia. We just can’t — in the midst of an epic drought — afford to do dumb things with water in the state of Arizona anymore.”

Mayes, a Democrat, sought the revocations after she said her office had found inconsistencies in the permit applications. Mayes vowed to look into Fondomonte’s operations and water use last year after the Arizona Republic reported that the Arizona State Land Department leased the company thousands of acres of farmland for below market value.

Fondomonte did not respond to multiple requests for comment from the AP. Its lawyers have said previously that the company legally leased and purchased land in the U.S. and spent millions on infrastructure improvements.

Years of drought have ratcheted up pressure on water users across the West, particularly in states like Arizona, which relies heavily on the dwindling Colorado River. The drought has also made groundwater — long used by farmers and rural residents with little restriction — even more important for users across the state.

Saudi Arabia, struggling with its own water shortages in the past decade, restricted the growth of some forage crops in the country. That Fondomonte chose Arizona as a place to grow such crops has angered some in the state, which has faced two consecutive years of federal water cuts from the Colorado River, a primary water source for the state.

Officials from both parties have criticized the use of state water by foreign-owned entities, with Gov. Katie Hobbs, also a Democrat, saying in her January state of the state address that she, too, would look into the practice. The state’s groundwater, Hobbs said, “should be used to support Arizonans, not foreign business interests.”

That same month, Republican state legislators introduced a bill to prohibit sales of state lands to foreign governments, state enterprises and any company based in China, Russia or Saudi Arabia.

“There’s a perception that water goes to local uses,” said Andrew Curley, a professor of geography and the environment at the University of Arizona. “When you recognize it’s going far away, that the products and benefits of this water are exported overseas, that really provokes people’s attention.”

Foreign entities and individuals control roughly 3% of U.S. farmland, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Canada is the largest holder — mainly of forestland. Fourteen U.S. states have restrictions on foreign individuals or entities owning farmland, but limitations vary widely and no state completely prohibits it.

Fondomonte also farms in California’s Palo Verde Valley, an area that gets its water from the Colorado River. Those operations have attracted less scrutiny. And it’s not the only foreign company that farms in the Southwest. The United Arab Emirates-owned Al Dahra ACX Global Inc. grows forage crops in Arizona and California, and is a major North American exporter of hay.

U.S. farmers themselves export hay and other forage crops to the Middle East — mainly to Saudi Arabia. China is the primary export market for U.S. hay.

In Arizona, renewed attention to Fondomonte’s water use is raising questions about the state’s lack of regulation around pumping groundwater in rural parts of the state.

Phoenix, Tucson and other Arizona cities have restrictions on how much groundwater they can pump under a 1980 state law aimed at protecting the state’s aquifers. But in rural areas, little is required of water users besides registering wells with the state and using the water for activities, including farming that are deemed a “beneficial use.”

“Frankly, I believe they are not doing their jobs,” Mayes said about Arizona’s Department of Water Resources’ oversight of rural areas. The Department declined to comment on the revoked drilling permits or the need for more groundwater regulation.

Mayes, along with hydrologists and environmental advocates, says more studies are needed of groundwater basins in rural areas — such as La Paz County, an agricultural county of about 16,000 people. Currently, Arizona doesn’t measure how much groundwater users pump in such areas, which means there is little understanding of how much water an operation like Fondomonte — or other farms — uses.

Almarai’s holdings in the Southwest are just one example of the farmland the company and its subsidiaries operate outside Saudi Arabia. It farms tens of thousands of acres in Argentina, which has also faced severe drought conditions in recent years.

Holly Irwin, a member of the La Paz County Board of Supervisors, has long opposed Fondomonte using water in the county. She said she’s fielded complaints from residents for years that it’s getting harder to pump water in nearby wells and has repeatedly asked the state to do something about it.

“We need to have some sort of regulation so it’s not all just being pumped out of the ground,” Irwin said.

6 notes · View notes

ovaruling · 7 months

Text

1. Nearly All U.S. Turkeys Are Raised on Factory Farms

Each year, more than 200 million turkeys are slaughtered for food in the U.S. [over 46 million of those solely for the holidays] — and over 99 percent of U.S. turkeys are raised on industrial farms and kept in severely crowded and unsanitary conditions. They are given little or no care and denied the chance to engage in many natural behaviors, like nesting, rooting in the grass for food, or perching. Sheds are filled with ammonia and animal waste, which is harmful to both birds and human workers and puts both at risk for respiratory conditions.

2. Turkeys Are Bred for Painful Rapid Growth

Factory-farmed turkeys are selectively bred to grow to an unnatural size quickly, reaching market weight in just four months. By that age, today’s factory-farmed males are roughly triple the weight of adult wild male turkeys. This breeding for maximal production and profit leaves many birds suffering from deformities and heart conditions and too large to fly, roost, or mate naturally. Burdened by their body weight, some cannot stand or reach their water and food.

3. Turkeys Are Subjected to Painful Mutilations

Many consumers may be shocked that some excruciating procedures are considered standard practice in the poultry industry. Turkeys and chickens alike are routinely detoed (the tips of their toes are severed) and “debeaked” (the tips of their beaks are burned or cut off) — all with no form of pain relief. This is an attempt to prevent injuries caused by the stress of extreme crowding, caused by factory farming itself. While the American Veterinary Medical Association has not condemned debeaking, it has acknowledged that “acute and chronic pain are associated with this procedure.”

4. Birds Are Excluded From the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act

While other land animals — including pigs, cows, and sheep — are offered basic protections under the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, birds (including turkeys, chickens, ducks, and geese) are excluded. This leaves the treatment of these birds at slaughter largely up to meat and egg producers, who most often put profit above animal welfare. While turkeys and chickens are lowered into electrified water in an attempt to stun them, this often fails, leaving many birds conscious when their throats are cut.

5. Animal Agriculture Is a Major Driver of Our Climate Crisis

Many factors affect human-induced climate change, but farming billions of animals yearly is widely considered a leading driver of our environmental crisis. Animal agriculture accounts for at least 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The industry also uses 80 percent of U.S. agricultural land — and according to the University of Minnesota, the U.S. could feed almost three times more people by providing major crops directly to humans rather than livestock. One of the easiest and most effective ways an individual can do their part in helping to fight climate change is by choosing a plant-based diet.

#v #vp

3 notes · View notes

argyrocratie · 6 months

Text

"The corporate ruling class’s approach to “free market reform” is a sort of mirror-image of “lemon socialism.” Under lemon socialism, the political capitalists (acting through the state) choose to nationalize those industries that corporate capital will most benefit from having taken off its hands, and to socialize those functions the cost of which capital would most prefer the state to bear. They shift functions from the private to the state sector when they are perceived as necessary for the functioning of the system, but not sufficiently profitable to justify the bother of running them under “private sector” auspices.

Under “lemon market reform,” on the other hand, the political capitalists liquidate interventionist policies after they have squeezed all the benefit out of state action. A good example: British industrialists felt it was safe to adopt “free trade” in the mid-nineteenth century,after mercantilism had served its purpose. Half the world had been hammered into a unified market by British force of arms and was held together by a British merchant fleet. Britain had stamped out competing industry in the colonial world. It had reenacted the Enclosures on a global scale, stealing enormous amounts of land from native populations and converting it to cash crops for the imperial market. The commanding position of British capital was the direct result of past mercantilism; having established this commanding position, it could afford “free trade.”

The so-called “free trade” movement in the contemporary United States follows the same pattern. A century ago, high tariff barriers served the interests of American capital. Today, when the dominant corporate interests are transnational, tariffs are no longer useful to them. They actually impede the transfer of goods and partially finished products between the national subdivisions of a single global corporation, or the importation of goods produced offshore by nominally independent sweatshops producing on contract for American corporations.

On the other hand, so-called “intellectual property” today serves exactly the same protectionist function for transnational corporations that tariffs used to serve for the old national corporations a century ago. Patents and trademarks enable corporations that no longer actually produce anything to outsource all actual production to factories in other countries, but to maintain a legal monopoly on the right to dispose of the product.

Patents and trademarks servethe same basic function of enabling a corporation to monopolize the right to sell a given product in a given market area -- the only difference is that the protective barriers operate along corporate boundaries instead of national boundaries. So the political capitalists promote a version of “free trade” that involves doing away with outmoded tariff barriers while promoting “Free Trade Agreements” whose main purpose is expanding the new protectionism of “intellectual property” law."

-Kevin Carson, "Formal vs. Substantive Statism: A Matter of Context" (2019)

#kevin carson #intellectual property #capitalism #free trade

6 notes · View notes

research-related-blogs · 6 months

Text

Growing Green Farming- Exploring Potential of Biofertilizers Market

Biofertilizers does role of protecting soil by destroying many harmful substances present in soil causing crop diseases. In semi-arid conditions, biofertilizers enhance crop productivity and the quality of agricultural products. Soil microbes influence crop growth as they can improve nitrogen content in soil. Sustainable practices have gained traction of attention in farming practices and products leading to farmers' preference for green fertilizers.

The Biofertilizers market is foreseen to grow with a CAGR of 12.2% in 2021-2028. This market has the potential to surpass a valuation of USD 4,474.43 million by 2028.

Growing population driving demand for food security. This is foreseen to create crop production pressure on farmers. Probing the need for healthy agriculture contributed to garnering attention on biofertilizers. Soil quality, water, and fertilizers are determinants of healthy agriculture. Biofertilizers are the best alternative to chemical fertilizers when added to the soil they promote fertility.

With time arable land loses its yield capacity where fortification with fertilizer is needed. Biofertilizers are natural sources to promote nutrition uptake in crops and eventually lead to growth. Consumers globally started to shift towards organic food which begins right from sustainable farming and ends with clean-label products at shelves. Biofertilizers have resistance to environmental stress and they mobile growth hormones. Rising food safety concerns around the globe are foreseen to create a lucrative space for organic products and biofertilizers.

#biofertilizers #Plant growth-promoting #Nitrogen fixing #Green Food Security #Phosphorus Solubilizin #Phosphorus-mobilizing

2 notes · View notes

crop-protection-market · 3 months

Text

Exploring the Crop Protection Market Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

Introduction

The crop protection market plays a vital role in modern agriculture, ensuring the health and productivity of crops by mitigating the impact of pests, diseases, and weeds. This blog delves into the various aspects of the crop protection market, including market analysis, challenges, growth drivers, key players, opportunities, and emerging trends.

Understanding the Crop Protection Market

Market Analysis

The Crop Protection Market encompasses a wide range of products and solutions designed to safeguard crops from threats. According to recent market research reports, the Global Crop Protection Market size was valued at USD 60.08 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 77.54 billion by 2025, registering a CAGR of 5.3% during the forecast period.

Market Share

Several major players dominate the crop protection market, including Syngenta, Bayer CropScience, BASF, Corteva Agriscience, and FMC Corporation. Together, these companies command a significant portion of the market share, offering a diverse portfolio of crop protection products ranging from herbicides and insecticides to fungicides and biopesticides.

Market Challenges

Despite its significance, the crop protection market faces several challenges, including regulatory hurdles, environmental concerns, resistance development in pests and diseases, and increasing demand for sustainable farming practices. Addressing these challenges requires innovation, collaboration, and regulatory compliance from industry stakeholders.

Click Here - To Know more about Agriculture Industry

Exploring Market Growth and Opportunities

Market Growth

The crop protection market is experiencing steady growth, driven by several factors such as population growth, urbanization, and the need to enhance agricultural productivity to meet global food demand. Additionally, the adoption of modern farming techniques, precision agriculture, and integrated pest management (IPM) practices is fueling market growth.

Top Players in the Market

Leading companies in the crop protection market invest heavily in research and development to introduce advanced and effective crop protection solutions. These companies leverage their expertise, technological capabilities, and global reach to provide farmers with innovative products and services tailored to their specific needs.

Market Opportunities

Emerging trends such as the growing demand for organic and bio-based crop protection products, increasing focus on sustainable agriculture, and the adoption of digital farming technologies present significant opportunities for market players. Additionally, expanding into emerging markets, investing in product innovation, and strategic partnerships can unlock new growth avenues.

Analyzing Market Trends

Technological Advancements

Technological innovations, including precision spraying systems, drone-based crop monitoring, and digital platforms for pest and disease management, are reshaping the crop protection landscape. These advancements enable farmers to optimize resource use, minimize environmental impact, and improve crop yields.

Sustainability Initiatives

With increasing consumer awareness and regulatory pressures, there is a growing emphasis on sustainable crop protection practices. Companies are investing in the development of eco-friendly and biodegradable products, promoting integrated pest management strategies, and supporting initiatives for soil health and biodiversity conservation.

Conclusion

The Crop Protection Market plays a critical role in ensuring global food security and sustainable agriculture. Despite facing challenges, the market continues to grow, driven by technological advancements, shifting consumer preferences, and the need for efficient pest and disease management solutions. By embracing innovation, sustainability, and collaboration, stakeholders can navigate the evolving landscape of the crop protection market and contribute to the resilience and productivity of agriculture worldwide.

0 notes

medicaldevicesindustrynews · 10 months

Text

Seed Treatment Market: Enhancing Crop Yield and Protection

If it is said that the entire agriculture is dependent on seeds, then surely it is right. They are the point of initiation of a crop lifecycle, and if the seeds don’t germinate, crops fail. There are a lot of challenges faced by seeds, such as pests to diseases and also environmental conditions. It is a fact that seeds can come on top of all these challenges by themselves, the probabilities for…

View On WordPress

#agriculture #Bio-based Solutions #Crop Productivity #Crop Protection #crop yield #Disease Management #Global Food Security #innovations #market trends #Modern Agriculture #pest control #Seed Treatment Market #Seed Treatments #Sustainable Farming

0 notes

mariacallous · 1 year

Text

The artificial intelligence race is gathering pace, and the stakes could not be higher. Major corporate players—including Alibaba, DeepMind, Google, IBM, Microsoft, OpenAI, and SAP—are leveraging huge computational power to push the boundaries of AI and popularize new AI tools such as GPT-4 and Bard. Hundreds of other private and non-profit players are rolling out apps and plugins, staking their claims in this fast-moving frontier market that some enthusiasts predict will upend the way we work, play, do business, create wealth, and govern.

Amid all the enthusiasm, there is a mounting sense of dread. A growing number of tech titans and computer scientists have expressed deep anxiety about the existential risks of surrendering decision-making to complex algorithms and, in the not so distant future, super-intelligent machines that may abruptly find little use for humans. A 2022 survey found that roughly half of all responding AI experts believed there is at least a one in 10 chance these technologies could doom us all. Whatever the verdict, as recent U.S. congressional testimony from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reveals, AI represents an unprecedented shift in the social contract that will fundamentally redefine relations between people, institutions, and nations.

Adding to these ominous existential worries is the already lopsided distribution of power and wealth, ensuring that the winnings of future upheaval will accrue disproportionately to the 1 percent. But if AI menaces white-collar jobs and empowers undemocratic interests in privileged countries, what to say about the fallout in those parts of the world where billions toil in the informal sector without safety nets, making them even easier marks for power elites and their digital tools? However the AI disruption plays out worldwide, there is scant hope that, without mitigation, safeguards, and compensation such as universal basic income, the world will be a more equitable place to live, work, or vote.

Fears about the existential risks posed by machine intelligence are hardly new. In his 1872 novel Erewhon, Samuel Butler prophesied that sentient machines would eventually replace humans. In 1942, master science fiction writer Isaac Asimov famously laid out his three laws for robotics: Robots may not injure humans, must obey orders from humans as long as this does not violate the first law, and must protect humans’ existence as long as this does not violate the first two laws. A few years later, in 1950, Alan Turing imagined machines that could converse with humans, while in 1965 Irving John Good predicted a machine-driven “intelligence explosion.” The world had to wait another half century for the promised AI revolution to arrive.

And yet for all the historical premonitions, the current furor over AI is as unprecedented as it is uniquely unsettling. For one, the latest crop of highly advanced large language models and the computational power driving them are no longer confined to the laboratory but are already being used by hundreds of millions of people. Another cause for concern is that some of the most outspoken AI advocates are now convinced that its unregulated use poses a fatal risk to humanity in the near future. What was once floated as a distant theoretical threat is now a clear and present danger—so much so that technologists such as Eliezer Yudkowsky, Geoffrey Hinton, and Max Tegmark and more than 31,000 other people have called for a pause in training the most powerful forms of AI, which they see as among the “most profound risks to society and humanity” today.

Well before the latest outbreak of anxiety, governments, businesses and universities across North America and Western Europe were debating the real and potential harms associated with AI. Their attention converged on at least four possible threats. The first is the existential threat posed by super intelligent machines that may quickly dispose of humans. The second is widespread and accelerating unemployment, with Goldman Sachs recently estimating that as many as 300 million jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. The third major concern relates to the disturbing way AI imitates and shares text, voice, and video—and could thus supercharge misinformation and disinformation. A fourth fear is that AI could be used to build doomsday technologies—such as biological or cyber viruses—with devastating consequences.

We are not yet at the mercy of thinking machines. As awareness of AI risks has grown, so too have standards and guidance to mitigate them. But for the most part, these are voluntary, including hundreds of protocols and principles advocating for responsible design and self-restraint. Common priorities include aligning AI with the best interests of humans and promoting safety in the design and deployment of algorithms. Other objectives include transparency of the algorithms themselves, accountability in relation to their development and application, fairness and equity in their use, privacy and data protection, human oversight and control, and compliance with regulations. The focus on voluntary self-policing is starting to change, with tech companies themselves advocating for the establishment of AI agencies and the enforcement of more robust rules.

Yet the push to create safeguards is far from ecumenical. To date, most of the debate over AI and possible strategies to mitigate unintended harms is concentrated in the West. Most of the government and industry standards now on the table were issued in the European Union, the United States, or member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a club of 38 advanced economies. The EU, for example, is poised to release a new AI Act focusing on applications and systems that pose unacceptable and high risk. The Western focus on AI is hardly surprising given the density of AI companies, investors, and research institutes working on AI from Silicon Valley to Tel Aviv, Israel.

Even so, it is worth underlining that the needs and concerns of regions such as Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia—where AI is also rapidly expanding and will generate monumental effects—are not much reflected in the AI debate. Put another way, the vast majority of discussion about the consequences and regulation of AI is occurring among countries whose populations make up just 1.3 billion people. Far less attention and resources are dedicated to addressing these same concerns in poor and emerging countries that account for the remaining 6.7 billion of the global population.

This is a troubling omission, given that many of the darker consequences of poorly regulated AI are particularly resonant in the so-called global south. Undoubtedly, some anxieties are global, including those over super-intelligence, job losses, and accelerating fake news. Yet the darker portents of AI represent anything but an equal opportunity affliction. Unmitigated AI could deepen social, economic, and digital cleavages between and within countries. The unregulated spread of AI could also concentrate corporate power even more, and deepening techno-authoritarianism could accelerate the corrosion of already damaged democratic institutions.

While these AI-induced harms clearly represent universal threats, their impacts not only will fall unevenly across an already badly divided globe but could also prove particularly paralyzing in lower- and middle-income countries with precarious regulatory guardrails and weak institutions. For one, algorithms and datasets generated in wealthy countries and subsequently applied in developing nations could reproduce and reinforce biases and discrimination owing to their lack of sensitivity and diversity. Moreover, low-wage and low-skill workers already suffering from poor pay and lax labor protections are particularly exposed to the job-killing effects of AI. There are, of course, many potential benefits to the spread of AI in the global south, but these may not be harnessed without adequate AI regulation, ethical governance, and better public awareness of the need to limit AI’s damaging effects.

Given the blistering pace of AI advances, the time for building regulatory guardrails and other backstops is now. AI-powered technologies are rapidly being adopted in some of the world’s most unequal countries in Africa (including the Central African Republic, Mozambique, and South Africa), the Middle East (including Oman, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia) and Latin America (including Brazil, Chile, and Mexico). Yet many of the basic laws and principles to govern safe AI have yet to be fully developed, much less negotiated and publicly debated. Likewise, large U.S., European, and Chinese technology vendors are rapidly introducing powerful AI technologies in many developing countries, securing dominant market share in surveillance and other AI applications, and wiping out the local competition. The use of AI technologies to reinforce illiberal and autocratic governance is already on full display in places such as Cambodia, China, Egypt, Nicaragua, Russia, and Venezuela.

Unfettered AI development is good news for autocrats and power elites who are already set up to reap the spoils of government and monopolize public goods. Unless effective regulations, equitable compensatory mechanisms, social safeguards, and political firewalls can be built, AI is likely to deliver greater uncertainty and collateral damages to the globe’s digitally challenged underclass, for whom next-generation technology will be someone else’s miracle.

4 notes · View notes

market-insider · 1 year

Text

Biostimulants: Tailoring Solutions for Crop Performance Enhancement

Biostimulants are substances or microorganisms that are applied to plants, seeds, or the surrounding environment to enhance plant growth, development, and overall health. Unlike fertilizers, which primarily provide essential nutrients to plants, biostimulants work by stimulating natural processes within the plants themselves. They contain various biologically active compounds, such as amino acids, proteins, vitamins, enzymes, and plant hormones, which can improve nutrient uptake, enhance stress tolerance, and stimulate beneficial microbial activity in the rhizosphere. Biostimulants can be derived from natural sources, including seaweed extracts, humic and fulvic acids, beneficial microorganisms (such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria), and other plant-based substances. They are commonly used in agriculture, horticulture, and turf management to promote plant growth, increase crop yield, improve nutrient efficiency, and enhance the resilience of plants to environmental stressors. Biostimulants offer a sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to optimizing plant performance and supporting sustainable agricultural practices.

Gain deeper insights on the market and receive your free copy with TOC now @: Biostimulants Market Report

The biostimulants market has witnessed significant developments in recent years due to growing awareness about sustainable agriculture practices and the need for improving crop productivity. Manufacturers are continuously improving the formulation of biostimulant products to enhance their efficacy and ease of application. This includes the development of concentrated liquid formulations, water-soluble powders, and granular formulations that ensure better nutrient absorption and distribution in plants. Biotechnological advancements have played a crucial role in the development of biostimulant products. Biotechnological techniques such as genetic engineering, microbial fermentation, and extraction processes are being used to produce biostimulants with higher concentrations of active compounds, improved efficacy, and targeted functionalities. There is ongoing research to better understand the mode of action of biostimulants and their interaction with plants. This research aims to identify specific physiological and biochemical mechanisms triggered by biostimulants, including hormonal regulation, enzyme activities, gene expression, and nutrient uptake pathways. The findings help in optimizing the application of biostimulants for maximum plant response.

Companies are focusing on developing biostimulants tailored for specific crops or plant species. These specialized products consider the unique nutritional and physiological needs of different plants, ensuring targeted benefits and improved crop performance. Several countries have started implementing regulations specific to biostimulant products. These regulations aim to define product categories, establish quality standards, and ensure the efficacy and safety of biostimulants in agricultural practices. The introduction of regulations provides clarity to manufacturers, distributors, and farmers, fostering responsible growth of the biostimulants market. Microbial-based biostimulants, such as beneficial bacteria and fungi, are gaining attention in the market. Researchers are exploring different microbial strains and their interactions with plants to unlock their potential in improving nutrient uptake, disease resistance, and overall plant health. Farmers and agronomists are incorporating biostimulants into integrated crop management practices, including precision agriculture and sustainable farming systems. Biostimulants are being used in combination with other inputs like fertilizers and crop protection products to optimize plant health, reduce chemical inputs, and improve environmental sustainability. The biostimulants market is experiencing global expansion, with increased product availability in various regions. This expansion is driven by rising demand for sustainable agriculture solutions, government initiatives supporting organic farming practices, and the need to address environmental concerns associated with conventional agricultural practices.

#Biostimulants Market Size & Share #Global Biostimulants Market #Biostimulants Market Latest Trends #Biostimulants Market Growth Forecast #COVID-19 Impacts On Biostimulants Market #Biostimulants Market Revenue Value

2 notes · View notes

zvaigzdelasas · 2 years

Text

Brazil has so much fertilizer that shipments are getting turned away. Case in point: Swiss-based fertilizer producer Ameropa AG diverted a shipment of 17,416 metric tons of monoammonium phosphate -- commonly known as MAP -- to the US last month due to Brazil’s full silos and dwindling demand for chemicals from farms.[...]

The move marks a turnaround for a country that imported a record amount of fertilizers this year. Fertilizer companies took an unprecedented amount of orders to ensure Brazilian farmers would have enough crop inputs to expand their planted areas as grains prices soared and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine threatened to disrupt global supplies.

Brazilian farmers, who faced soaring prices for crop inputs earlier this year, are planning to cut back on fertilizer, reducing demand when supplies are ample. Such circumstances have caused fertilizer prices in the South American country to plunge.

“With prices at record levels, farmers decided to reduce applications to protect their margins,” Marina Cavalcante, an analyst at Bloomberg’s Green Markets said. Farmers are able to skip application of phosphate fertilizers without compromising yields since the soil can retain this nutrient for more than a year, she said.

4 Oct 22

8 notes · View notes