Yk I'm aware that villains putting people under curses that can "only be broken by true loves kiss" or something along those lines are supposed to be heartless/not truly feel love or whatever the hell the narrative wants to imply. And whilst I could go on about the aro/ace dehumanization of that I wanna focus more on this idea that I kinda just thought of rn
villans that do this don't believe in TRUE LOVE. As in some divine ment to be unbreakable bond type delio. And that's a lot more realistic because (at least from what I'm aware) relationships very often come and go. Villains don't believe that some joe shmoe with a horse and good looks just waltzing up to a corpse and kissing it has anything to gain than idk maybe princeship or something if the curs-ee is a princess. Let alone if the person cursed will mesh with them better than "oh you saved me from death one time". Overall it's just very unlikely and, honestly reasonable thing to do when cursing someone if you are absolutely required to have the curse be breakable in one way or another.
that or you know just have the curse breaker have to do some demeaning or obscure complicated task that you don't actively announce.
Hey be sure to go to your blog settings, head down to visibility and turn on this little button that prevents Tumblr from stealing your posts and using it to train AI learning models. Good job, fuckheads, great update.
This was not requested nor made for anyone. I just thought it be a silly
(made w this btw check out if interested: https://benisland.neocities.org/petpet/)
Funny how aromatic/asexual is trending on new years, i will personally take it as a sign that next year is the year of the aspecs and none of yall can stop me.