Tumgik
#back to film criticism:
tafadhali · 2 years
Text
Experimented with experiencing some exquisite pain while watching the new Hellraiser (spilled an entire cup of boiling tea on my leg and hip) and while the sounds I made were certainly interesting I think, on reflection, I have to say KINK TOMATO to Mx. Pinhead
1 note · View note
thegoosiestlucy · 3 months
Text
argylle is very fun and very musically unhinged and very camp and you should all go see it in cinemas
402 notes · View notes
2-gay-2-furious · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
49 notes · View notes
movietonight · 3 months
Text
While there are things to criticise mash for and those conversations are important to have some of what I read can be explained very easily by reminding yourself
It was a TV show
On a budget
From years ago
From America
Written by a variety of human writers
Who used characters and plots to tell stories
Within a certain number of minutes
20 notes · View notes
masteraqua · 6 months
Text
i just rewatched puss in boots the last wish after seeing wish yesterday and just. like.
it's insane to me how similar they are in terms of themes and subject matter (wishes, fairytales, etc.) but where one of them is realized with groundbreaking visual artistry and a gripping story rooted in potent human experiences, the other rings hollow and flat, both visually and narratively, in its cynical, weak-willed pursuit of corporatized nostalgia.
20 notes · View notes
Text
I just wanna let the MCU fandom know it’s okay to expect decent CGI from a multi-billion dollar corporation. It is literally the least they can do.
387 notes · View notes
ravenalla · 7 months
Text
The way before mando season 3 came out when I heard we were getting a 4th season I could not have been more hyped it wasn’t gonna be ending, and now when I see updated filming news about I couldn’t care less :/
20 notes · View notes
peridaniel · 1 year
Text
when chetney did his "im here to fix your pool" line and marisha's entire body viscerally reacted to it
79 notes · View notes
isfjmel-phleg · 2 months
Text
One more paragraph to go! I realized that I had put into the first paragraph information that made more sense later on, so shifting things around got some thoughts moving and rekindled my desire to fistfight some of these authors of retellings, which I think is where you're supposed to be emotionally as an academic (this is a joke. I am joking.), so...progress. Very slowly.
14 notes · View notes
kenobihater · 3 days
Text
i'm god's strongest soldier for what i'm thinking about doing tomorrow. i'm toying around with the concept of an essay (either a longass meta post or a proper vid essay if i can be bothered) about 1917 being an effective depiction of the horrors of war without being gritty due to brief moments of humanity and beauty despite destruction. to contrast this mastery, i might re-watch fury for the first time in a decade to point out where "realism" goes wrong. i cannot stress how gritty and edgy this movie is. to give you a vague idea of how bad it is, it's directed by the same guy who directed suicide squad 2016
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
tornrose24 · 7 months
Text
After seeing Killers of the Flower Moon, and remembering Martin complaining about how superhero films aren't 'real films' I just want to say....
No, superhero films aren't often cinematic masterpieces, but we go to them because we want to have a good time.
If you have to sit through a film that's over 2 hours, it sure better be entertaining.
Most superhero films are based off comics that have fandoms that only grow because of the films.
We care about the characters when done right.
Most importantly.... the movie is about superheroes, and if we care about them, its doing the right job. ESPECIALLY if the characters we want to root for are the ACTUAL protagonists, which is where Killers of the Flower Moon is weak, because we want to follow Mollie as a main character, and not the husband who helped kill off most of her family and people behind her back.
7 notes · View notes
urmoneymysummer · 8 months
Text
Short film review: “DESTRUCTION” (Andelman, 2016)
DESTRUCTION is a breathtaking and wildly under-appreciated short film/documentary focusing on the impact of technology on the music industry.
Its impressive 8 minute runtime follows the journey of an ordinary MP3 player‘s rise from rock bottom to rockstar (and back again). This film raises strikingly profound moral and ethical questions regarding the rights and autonomy of machines in the modern age, with an unexpected plot twist that will leave you wondering: are humans and computers so different after all?
The soundtrack is also excellent for such a small budget film. I particularly like the thematic shift in the second half of the film, it was subtle but nuanced.
Overall, I’d rate it a 9.5/10. It had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. The story was exhilarating and the acting was phenomenal. I almost wish Joywave were a real band— I would definitely be a fan. Half a point off because the credits were too fast for me to read. A minor detail, but it really took me out of the immersion.
youtube
12 notes · View notes
lizzardtown · 1 month
Text
My favourite film critic hasn't had an article in the newspaper in 3 whole weeks It's killing me
2 notes · View notes
yukipri · 2 years
Text
Just got back from the Jurassic Park (I) and Jurassic World Dominion double feature and, two non-spoiler things to note:
1. I enjoyed Dominion a shocking amount, way more than I expected. I went in with very low expectations, given how much I didn't like Fallen Kingdom, but Dominion felt very different. It felt like it paid proper homage to the original Jurassic Park movies as well as the Jurassic World movies, and felt like a satisfying end to the franchise, as much as it can be. The new characters also are amazing.
2. After watching, I absolutely GET why these two films were paired. No spoilers, but if you're planning on seeing this movie and it's been a while since you've seen the OG Jurassic Park, do yourself a favor and do a refresher watching prior to Dominion. I think you'll like Dominion a lot more if you do. (only the very first Jurassic Park movie is really necessary, though i'm sure watching the whole JP trilogy/JW trilogy may enhance your experience in ways that I missed)
Was Dominion perfect? Of course not. But I think it did a good job, had some neat ideas both old and new, juggled its massive cast excellently, and most importantly, entertained me.
131 notes · View notes
poorlittlevampirebaby · 10 months
Text
ngl when the actor shifts from jason miller to brad dourif so you get the impression of kinderman certain the guy in isolation is karras to realizing it isn't him... that was good
the thing about this movie is that it is good actually and maybe would work better as a stand alone just pretend the exorcist doesn't exist bc my god blatty wrote this script he's rlly retconning everything we know about kinderman just to fit this narrative and i find it repulsive lmfao like BEFORE i used to just be like UGH why would he kill off joe the Homophobia™ but the issue really is centering the dude who was rlly an obstacle in the first place and clearly changing his personality (sure ppl change after 15 years but like WHY him WHYYYY) so like What Is The Truth lmao
7 notes · View notes
highfantasy-soul · 2 months
Text
Does anyone else get the feeling that criticisms about dialogue being 'too on the nose', 'corny', 'they should have shown us that, not told us' is stemming from our society's extreme aversion to genuine sentiment and hyper-individualism?
Like, at least I know that myself as an American, was taught to not talk about my feelings, handle it myself, and any genuine expression or feeling was ridiculed and mocked. It feels like we've moved from doing that to real people to doing it to media, too.
Watch any old show, read any old story, and it's filled with characters bluntly stating how they feel. The monologue is a massively famous thing to include in all sorts of media, but now, if a character dares to say 'that made me sad' - even if it's SHOWING that they're opening up to someone when they had previously been very guarded, etc - everyone lambasts it because 'they should have shown not told' but... I think our knee-jerk rush to that criticism is stemming from something deeper.
I think people need to sit with why someone having open communication and putting words to what they're feeling feels so off-putting to them. I think it's because we are taught to never, ever, under any circumstances, do that in real life - keep it inside, don't burden anyone else with that, handle your icky feelings yourself and don't involve others. We say 'don't suffer alone' but then craft society so that you just have to guess what someone is feeling and magically come up with the right thing to do for them instead of, you know, communicating.
Even though it's fiction and we're supposed to be getting a bunch of info about someone we don't know in a situation we've never seen before in a short amount of time, we treat our criticism the same way we would if we supposedly had fifteen years to spend with the person and learn all their quirks and try to read their minds.
Idk, just something I was thinking about since the criticism that film makers 'now' hand-hold the audience is flying around like crazy, then I look back at former media and... direct dialogue has always been a thing.
Go back and tell Shakespeare that Lady Macbeth needed to SHOW that she couldn't get that spot off her hand instead of telling the audience 'A spot! A spot!' over and over in a monologue. You go do that real quick and get back to me on how that went and if you still feel like a super smart critic.
3 notes · View notes