Thanks for the hot tip but I have seen it already and have drawn my own conclusions regarding the matter, especially after considering the sources.
Always, always, always:
CONSIDER THE SOURCE.
I’ve chosen not to post your ask because the less attention placed on this person, the better.
If you recall, it was also around Christmas three years ago that this person’s “mentor” revealed herself.
I often wonder what would’ve happened had we simply amplified the truth this “mentor” told initially and ignored her outlandish claims, which she began spewing with a vengeance when she realized that she could attract far more notoriety and attention by changing her story to one much more salacious and destructive. Because haters love to hate.
As I’ve said before, the right thing to do when an actual crime has been committed is to file charges with the police and provide solid evidence of the crime, to support the claim with the proper authorities should one also seek to file a claim in court. Justice absolutely should be served but only if it’s warranted. And much more evidence than this is required.
Her protégé’s claim is vague, without specific evidence to support it, presented only to stir the pot of defamation once again.
The protégé is wearing a bathing suit and appears to be posing for the photo in question. She looks to have undergone a recent “cupping” treatment. It’s difficult to determine exactly what her grievance against the accused might be.
Regret is not a crime. Consent, or the denial thereof, is not retroactive. Objective facts are immutable. Vague implications are not facts.
And proclaiming a known delusional stalker and compulsive liar as her mentor serves only to discredit her claims.
Likewise, this “news” breaking from a source known to have a close relationship with the accused’s disgruntled aunt publicly feuding with the accused over the family fortune serves only to raise questions about the source’s credibility and motives.
Both the accuser and the person breaking the news are relying on people’s wild imaginations and need for titillation to fill in the blanks of the story the accuser is not actually telling.
no, you don’t understand, greg house is to will graham as james wilson is to hannibal
now i knowwww what your thinking, i can already hear you whining “but but dr medical malpractice and the cannibal psychiatrists both have a sketchy approach to their practice, and a lot of their patients are dead bc of them” no. house and will are both genius savants that work tirelessly solving puzzles, while both wilson and hannibal are there to advise and guide and make the savant’s life just a little bit harder. also hannibal and wilson are both good cooks, so like…
Okay I'm officially starting a petition for Corlys and Rhaenys sexy scenes because they're the ONLY HEALTHY MARRIAGE in this fucking nut house of a show and we are in desperate need of a palate cleanser