#CNA Training Long Island | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

accesscareersworld-blog · 7 years

Text

Accesscareers Provides Best CNA Training In Long Island

Mеdiсаl аѕѕiѕtаnt trаining рrоgrаmѕ in Long Island рrераrе individuals tо work аѕ еntrу-lеvеl med assistants. This is done by рrераring students tо аѕѕiѕt during medical оr ѕurgiсаl procedures, uрdаtе раtiеnt сhаrtѕ, tаkе vital ѕignѕ, drаw blood or соllесt specimens fоr diаgnоѕtiс рurроѕеѕ. Suсh CNA Trainings аrе аlѕо typically required tо perform аdminiѕtrаtivе tаѕkѕ.

Aѕрiring mеd assistants hаvе ѕеvеrаl орtiоnѕ to сhооѕе frоm, inсluding dеgrее and diрlоmа рrоgrаmѕ, аѕ wеll аѕ оnlinе courses. Each option iѕ аѕѕосiаtеd with specific features аnd bеnеfitѕ, аnd thе оnе ѕеlесtеd will largely depend uроn thе ѕtudеnt’ѕ personal preferences аnd lifestyle.

Thе curriculum is tурiсаllу dividеd between сlаѕѕrооm trаining аnd сliniсаl еxреriеnсеѕ, thе lаttеr of which is асԛuirеd аt a mеdiсаl facility. Hоwеvеr, with Medical Training Long Island, оnе’ѕ clinical еxреriеnсе will be obtained аt the specific facility where hе оr ѕhе hаѕ secured employment.

Medical Assistant Training Long IslandPrоgrаmѕ Courses

Pаtiеnt Cаrе аnd Cоmmuniсаtiоn

In оrdеr tо рrоvidе a high level оf саrе for patients аnd соmmuniсаtе еffесtivеlу with doctors аnd оthеr hеаlthсаrе рrоfеѕѕiоnаlѕ, one muѕt take courses in EKG Technician Training, Pharmacy Tech Training, CNA Training. A briеf соurѕе in еtiоlоgу mау аlѕо bе раrt of the curriculum. Thrоughоut thе соurѕе a student will also lеаrn how tо рrераrе раtiеntѕ fоr exams, tаkе thеir vitаl ѕignѕ, аnd trаnѕроrt thеm frоm оnе аrеа of thе fасilitу tо аnоthеr in a ѕаfе mаnnеr.

Phаrmасоlоgу

Pharmacology соurѕеѕ are part оf mоѕt Medical Training programs Long Island. During such courses, students will lеаrn essential infоrmаtiоn about vаriоuѕ mеdiсаtiоnѕ, соntrаindiсаtiоnѕ, ѕidе еffесtѕ and drug classifications. Althоugh assistants do not рrеѕсribе оr аdminiѕtеr mеdiсаtiоnѕ, thеу аrе often саllеd uроn tо communicate bеtwееn dосtоrѕ аnd рhаrmасiѕtѕ, making a bаѕiс understanding of pharmacology an essential aspect оf trаining.

Laboratory Prосеdurеѕ

Almost аll аѕѕiѕtаntѕ will bе саllеd upon аt some роint in their career to аѕѕiѕt with lаbоrаtоrу рrосеdurеѕ. This may inсludе blооd work, urinаlуѕiѕ, ѕаlivа tests аnd оthеr diagnostic procedures. For thiѕ rеаѕоn, аll medical аѕѕiѕtаnt еduсаtiоn рrоgrаmѕ inсludе аt lеаѕt оnе course in laboratory рrосеdurеѕ.

Cаrdiорulmоnаrу and Elесtrосаrdiоgrарhу

Mаnу mеdiсаl аѕѕiѕtаntѕ are аlѕо asked to аѕѕiѕt with tеѕtѕ ѕuсh аѕ EKG Technician Training оr other diagnostic procedures invоlving the heart. Undеr аррrорriаtе supervision, ѕtudеntѕ will lеаrn how tо аѕѕiѕt during саrdiорulmоnаrу рrосеdurеѕ and how to accurately log the results оf such tests in the patient’s chart.

Nutrition аnd Firѕt Aid

Mоѕt programs inсludе classes in first аid аnd nutritiоn. Prоѕресtivе mеdiсаl assistants Long Island will learn hоw tо реrfоrm cardiopulmonary rеѕuѕсitаtiоn and hоw tо properly administer firѕt аid. A briеf course in nutrition аnd dietary procedures is аlѕо included in the сurriсulum.

In addition tо the аfоrеmеntiоnеd courses, ѕtudеntѕ will also tаkе classes in medical ethics аnd healthcare law. Depending оn thе type оf соurѕе in whiсh оnе еnrоlѕ in, еlесtivеѕ mау inсludе рѕусhоlоgу, endocrinology, аnd rеligiоn.

There iѕ no dоubt thаt jоb opportunities in thе field оf hеаlthсаrе will inсrеаѕе аt a rapid расе throughout thе nеxt dесаdе. Fоr thiѕ rеаѕоn, ѕtudеntѕ will find that рurѕuing Medical Аѕѕiѕtаnt Trаining in Long Island iѕ a wоrthwhilе еndеаvоur.

Cliсk hеrе [ http://accesscareers.net/ ] if you are thinking аbоut bесоming a medical аѕѕiѕtаnt in Long Island. Gаin frее ассеѕѕ tо a plethora оf invаluаblе infоrmаtiоn and rеѕоurсеѕ about Long Island Pharmacy Tech Training, EKG Technician Training Long Island, and CNA Training.

#Medical Assistant Training Long Island #CNA Training #EKG Technician Training Long Island #Long Island Pharmacy Tech Training #Medical Training Long Island #Hempstead CNA Training #Medical Assistant Training Hempstead

0 notes

raystart · 4 years

Text

Technology, Innovation, and Modern War – Class 10 – The DOD and Modern War –– Michèle Flournoy

We just held our tenth session of our new national security class Technology, Innovation and Modern War. Joe Felter, Raj Shah and I designed a class to examine the new military systems, operational concepts and doctrines that will emerge from 21st century technologies – Space, Cyber, AI & Machine Learning and Autonomy.

Today’s topic was The DoD and Modern War.

Catch up with the class by reading our summaries of the previous nine classes here.

Some of the readings for this week’s introduction to AI and modern war included: War on Autopilot? It Will Be Harder Than the Pentagon Thinks, Considering Military Culture and Values When Adopting AI, Swarms of Mass Destruction, Joby Aviation raises $590 million led by Toyota to launch an electric air taxi service, Linking combat veterans and Valley engineers.

With Michèle Flournoy, former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy joining us, we also assigned her recent article in Foreign Affairs, “How to Prevent a War in Asia”and CNAS report “Sharpening the US Military’s Edge: Critical Steps for the Next Generation”

Michèle Flournoy is rumored to be Joe Biden’s candidate for Secretary of Defense.

She served as the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy from February 2009 to February 2012. She was the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the formulation of national security and defense policy, oversight of military plans and operations, and in National Security Council deliberations; and led the development of the Department of Defense’s 2012 Strategic Guidance. She’s currently Co-Founder and Managing Partner of WestExec Advisors, and former Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), a bipartisan national security think tank.

I’ve extracted a few of Michèle’s key insights and I urge you to read the entire transcript here and watch the video.

—

On China Throughout the 1990s, we were focused on how to integrate China into the global system so that it would become a responsible stakeholder.

And we did everything we could, WTO membership, all kinds of collaborative efforts. That worked for a while, but at a certain point, particularly under President Xi, China decided that the hide-and-bide strategy was over. It was time to take their claim, their rightful place in the international community. Be more assertive in pursuing their agenda in an international forum. And in particular in the Asia Pacific. And it became clear then that we have a number of areas where we really don’t see eye to eye – our interests and objectives are in conflict. Whether its economic, technological, military there are very important competitions that we’re going to have with China over the coming years that will determine the US ability to protect its own economic vitality, but also our security and that of our allies.

That said, there are also problems when you look around the world, whether it’s the next pandemic or climate change or Non-Proliferation where if the United States and China don’t figure out how to cooperate with one another we will both be in deep trouble. So there has to be a cooperative element of the relationship as well. And so that’s why I don’t like the Cold War frame. I think the name of the game is managing this competition, fostering cooperation where we can. Really focusing on deterring conflict between two nuclear powers, which by definition would be a disaster.

Is China becoming more confident in their capabilities and doubt of our own? They definitely are becoming more confident in their own capabilities. They’ve invested a lot in an anti-access/area denial strategy. And you see thousands and thousands of different kinds of precision munitions, rockets and missiles. They are doing a pretty good job of trying to create a situation where it will be very costly for us to go inside the first island chain or even a second island chain. But they’re not 10 feet tall; they have a lot of challenges as a military as well.

But the thing that worries me most is the narrative that’s taking hold in in Beijing about the United States, particularly in the wake of our mishandling of the pandemic, the onset of another recession, the sort of divisions and protests you see on the streets. It’s given rise to a narrative of US decline. US self-preoccupation. US turning inward. And to the extent that Chinese leaders start to believe that and really believe that we have not done what is necessary to counter their A2/AD system, they could gain a sense of false confidence that might get them to take more risk-taking behavior. To push the envelope a little too far. A little too fast. Maybe cross some red lines they don’t know they’re crossing.

So it’s on us to be very clear – the United States – about our resolve, our commitment to defending our interest and allies, and how we define those. And to make really clear investments in the capabilities that will ensure our ability to project power and protect those interests in the future.

How Should the DoD Spend Smarter? I think the real long pole in the tent is in developing new operational concepts, in light of a clear-eyed assessment of what we’re going to face from either China or for example Russia’s A2/AD network in Europe.

It forces us into an uncomfortable position. We like to be dominant in every domain. We like to be the one to beat. Here in every case, we’re going to have to be the asymmetric challenger. You’ve got a resident power with a huge set network of capabilities. They’re going to have more quantity than us. We’re going to have to figure out how to fight it asymmetrically for our advantage.

And so that means, first and foremost, that we really do have to think about new concepts. We have to have much more competitive processes for developing those concepts. Not sort of building consensus on lower common denominator, concepts where everybody gets an equal share of the pie. Not interested in that. We have to link that to a lot of prototyping of new capabilities, experimenting with those new capabilities. See how they can inform the new concepts and vice versa.

And so this very agile, iterative process of bringing new technologies and prototyping systems. Playing them in war games, playing them in simulations, playing them in different experiments taking that feedback, those learnings. Bringing it back to inform the next iteration of the design and so forth. This is the process that’s going to get us to the right place. And it’s something that’s just really, really hard for the Department of Defense to do. We’re not set up to do that quickly or well or at scale.

How Should the DoD Realign its Concepts, Culture, Programs and Budgets? Well first, the sense of urgency you do hear at the top among the Pentagon leadership is not necessarily fully shared throughout the bureaucracy – surprise, surprise. We’ve started to adjust our acquisition approach. And the departments have put out some very useful new guidance on how to approach software acquisition in a very different way than hardware acquisition. But we haven’t necessarily trained our acquisition people, incented them to have a greater risk tolerance that’s required for this agile development of emerging technologies. Nor have we created real rewards promotion paths career paths for that.

And so there’s a huge human capital effort to be done here to raise the overall tech literacy of all of the folks- from the program managers to the operators. But also, to bring more tech talent into government to really help speed the transformation process. And that requires again some culture change. You’re not going to keep tech talent if they walk into a typical Pentagon office today. You got to create a different operating culture. And I do think there’s some great examples – Kessel Run in the Air Force or the Joint AI center and parts of SOCOM. These are pockets where they’re trying a different approach, different culture, and having some success attracting the kind of tech talent the department needs. We just need to do all that at a much greater scale and with greater urgency.

Innovation Versus Innovation Adoption Thanks to organizations like DIU we’ve gotten much better at tech scouting; finding promising technologies that might have a military application, getting them on that initial contract – on a SBIR contract or an OTA prototyping contract.

But the real problem is that almost everybody hits the famous “valley of death.” So you’ve done a great prototype, you’ve won the demonstration, everybody loves you. And then they say, “Well, the next time we can actually insert you into the program and for a production contract is 2023, two and a half years from now.” And for a startup that’s like, “What do you mean? I’ve got to have access to recurring revenue to survive until then.” And so they get pressure from their investors to forget the national security side, just go commercial. It’s this terrible situation. So what do we need to fix that?

Number one, you need a more flexible set of funding authorities to bridge that gap. One idea is to allow the services to have some greater reprogramming authorities within mission areas or across portfolios, so that at the end of the year, when they’d have something that didn’t work, they can scrape up money there and put it into the next iteration of development for the thing that does work, and maybe get another year of bridge funding to get to that production contract.

That obviously requires some working with Congress to get them comfortable that they’ll have the transparency and oversight, but they need to give the department that kind of flexibility. I also think it involves bringing the ultimate end user into the earliest contact. So you have a program manager who’s watching this thing like a hawk from the beginning. And is already thinking about how it’s going to disrupt and be integrated into something he or she is responsible for. And you have to incent that. Rather just rewarding this rigorous, we only care about cost and schedule. You’ve got incent program managers if you can get better performance at lower costs, you got to be a disrupter yourself. You got to bring new ideas into what you’re managing to do that – which is a very different approach. It’s not easy to do. But we have to try to figure that out.

How Can We Work More Closely with Allies and Partners? For each of the key priority areas, whether it’s AI or robotics or Quantum or hypersonics, whatever it is, we could do some mapping of which of our allies really has cutting edge work going on, either in their research universities or in their innovation base. And look for opportunities of where we perhaps get farther faster by sharing some of that. There are all kinds of ways to do this. One is to cross invest. I know In-Q-Tel has started investing in UK companies, Australian companies, for example, with certain priorities in mind. I would love to see DIU get into the business of starting to bring some of those allied companies in.

I think this needs to be a topic of policy discussion of where we collectively go after some of these areas with joint ventures or joint technology development and more efforts like that at scale. It’s a very important area. Particularly given that both China and Russia are going to be leveraging these technologies in ways that are really counter to our Western values in terms of surveillance systems and without respect for personal privacy and all kinds of things. And I think the more we have a common values-based approach to technology with our allies, the stronger we can be in showing up at an international forum where standards are being set or norms are being set and so forth.

What Legacy Programs Should be Downsized to Fund Investment in Emerging Technologies? It’s a great and necessary question, because the DoD always has more programs than budget. But I think with COVID and with the recession whoever wins the White House in November, you’re going to see a flattening of the DoD budget. The sort of assumptions of 3% to 5% growth over and above inflation, that’s not going to hold no matter who is in the White House. So you’re going to have to make some tough tradeoffs. I can’t give you an answer off top my head, but I can tell you how I would think it through.

I think we need to look mission area by mission area and look across services at portfolios of capabilities to ask, “What is the mix that we need so that we have the platforms we need, but also the money to invest and incorporate the emerging technologies that will make those legacy platforms survivable, relevant, combat effective in the future?” And so it really has to happen on a mission area basis.

I think in some cases you may find redundant capabilities within or between services. Sometimes you’ll say, I don’t want that redundancy. I’m going to make a determination and one is going to be a winner and the other is going to be a loser. But sometimes, for the sake of resilience, for the sake of complicating adversary attack planning, you may want redundancy. You may want multiple different ways to accomplish a particular task. So this has to be done with very strong analytic grounding. Looking at both performance and capability, but also cost, and so forth.

My bias is that we have to be much more aggressive in going down the road of human/machine teaming and in gaining mass, gaining capacity and complicating the other side’s planning process by incorporating unmanned in all domains. More unmanned undersea, on the sea, in the air and beyond. If we can crack the code on that integration that is going to give us for the cost of the system a lot more capacity and capability.

What Should be Done to Enhance the Recruitment and Retention of a Technologically Superior Defense Workforce? We’re finding one of the most important things we’re doing – who knew – is creating a handbook for the DoD folks to say, “Here are all the authorities, you may not know you have for bringing tech talent is. Here are the best practices in terms of how to approach the hiring process. Here are the kinds of things you need to have in place to make those folks successful.” And give them the tools they need to really contribute. So trying to take all the learnings of where it’s been tried and failed, or where it succeeded and why. And put it in a handbook for the DoD hiring authorities to say, here’s your own learnings that you can build on to get that tech talent in at greater scale and with greater speed.

One of the key barriers is still the clearance process. That seems to hold people up for a bit. But I think the department is seriously working on trying to reduce some of those barriers. Then the second piece, I would say, is career path. The services are actually sitting on a lot of STEM talent, but they don’t manage them as STEM talent. You know they forced the young captain who is the Air Force AI specialist to leave and go out and be on a squadron staff in order to check the box, so he can get his next promotion. The services need to design career paths for technologists, so that they can get rewarded, promoted, and reach leadership positions as technologists. Otherwise, we will under leverage the people who are already in the force.

What are Some Potential DoD Problems or Operational Concepts That You Would Like Our Best and Brightest Here At Stanford’s Address in Class – Now and in the Future – and Why? I think the long pole in the tent is this notion of joint all domain command and control in an environment that will be constantly contested. So the analogy is how do you build the equivalent of a resilient electrical grid as your command and control network? So that if on part of it you have an electronic warfare attack and one end of it goes down, the system automatically reroutes and is connecting shooters and sensors in a different way that allows them to keep operating without missing a beat.

So it’s coming up with how the key elements of stitching together a network of networks that has that resilience and an ability to connect and operate at the edge, even during periods where there’s disruption and you can’t call back to headquarters. That to me is the long pole in the tent for future multi-domain operations this very distributed approach to warfare, that will be necessary.

The second piece is the technical aspects of human machine teaming, and how that really works – and again, in multiple domains, whether it’s undersea or on the sea or in the air or above. That is another key point. And then just lots of applications that can increase the accuracy and speed of our decision-making faster than that of the other side. Just humans still making the decisions, but getting the right information, the right analysis to them at the right moment in time, where we can make the decision and gain that advantage in the cycle of competition.

How Can the Defense Department, and Our Leadership Unify the US Against These Threats in a Highly Partisan and Divided Political Environment? It’s a great question, and it points to this question of leadership. We need a president and a commander in chief to step forward and provide a vision to make the case, to provide the sort of nature of the challenges, the threat assessment, why it’s important to the prosperity and security of Americans at home. And what we need to do to go after it. I would love to see a moonshot moment kind of speech, a Kennedy speech that sort of says, We’re in this competition, and this is really going to matter to our way of life. But we’re America, we know how to do this. We came out of the Great Depression. We came out of World War Two. We came out of Vietnam. And we have good done this before. We are we are in crisis. We’re going to come out of this, and we’re going to be stronger and all of us need to help. So how are you going to help drive investment in the drivers of American competitiveness?

And some of it will be by doing great work in STEM in our research universities. Some of it will be investing in 21st century infrastructure. Some of it will be developing these new technologies that can transform both our society and our economy and our military. But really inspiring Americans to say, we need your talents. We need everybody to step up and help. That’s what I’m looking for. And, and I haven’t seen it recently, but I’m looking for that kind of leadership.

What Advice Would You Give America’s Best and Brightest, at Universities Across the Country on How They Can Serve and Make a Difference – Short of Joining the Military or Other US government Organizations? I think we should all feel some desire, but also an obligation to serve. I mean, to be partaking of all the incredible freedoms and benefits of this country. What can we give back? For some of us, it’s going to be going into government service or serving in the military.

But there are ways to serve in other parts of the US government. There are ways to serve in nonprofits. There are all kinds of ways to get involved in enriching society and helping to serve the United States. And so find whatever that area of passion is for you, find the time to do that. Maybe it’s going to be through your work, but maybe it’s going to be through some of the activities you do when you’re not at work. If we all stepped up to that, sort of drive to serve, it doesn’t have to be in government, we’d enrich our society so greatly.

So the homework assignment is – find that passion and that path to service, whether it’s going into government for a stint, advising or helping or investing in some other way that’s going to make your community or the country or the world a better place.

Read the entire transcript of Michèle Flournoy’s talk here and watch the video below.

youtube

If you can’t see the video click here

Lessons Learned

Michèle Flournoy is an experienced former senior defense official who is thinking deeply and critically about how to best address emerging national security challenges

She would be a great SecDef

#startups #text #startup #advice #busieness #howto #news #tech

0 notes

blogzshah · 5 years

Quote

(Bloomberg) -- Hong Kong protest organizers said they would lead demonstrators through Kowloon on Sunday in a march despite losing an appeal against a police ban on the procession.The Appeal Board on Public Meetings and Processions supported the police’s refusal to approve the march because of the potential for violence, Radio Television Hong Kong reported. The rally was originally called to protest a government ban on masks and comes after Wednesday’s attack on Civil Human Rights Front’s organizer Jimmy Sham by hammer-wielding thugs in Mong Kok.Protesters are seeking to keep the pressure on Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam with a 20th straight weekend of demonstrations. Earlier this week, Lam was twice shouted down in the city’s legislature by opposition lawmakers as she discussed her annual policy address.The protests began in opposition to Lam’s since-scrapped bill allowing extraditions to mainland China and have expanded to include calls for greater democracy and an independent inquiry. The unrest has turned increasingly violent, with frequent clashes between protesters and police.Here’s the latest (all times local):March to go ahead (5:17 p.m.)Civil Human Rights Front convener Figo Chan said he will lead a march Sunday along the route originally planned and he will be joined by other prominent pro-democracy activists including Leung Kwok-hung, Albert Ho and Cyd Ho, RTHK reported.Demonstrators planned to walk from Tsim Sha Tsui to the express rail terminus in West Kowloon before the police banned the march. The protesters could face arrest, but all of the city’s protests have had to deal with risks, whether they received police permission or not, RTHK cited Chan as saying.March ban upheld (2:30 p.m.)Hong Kong protesters lost an appeal against the police ban of their planned march on Sunday through Tsim Sha Tsui on concern about violence, RTHK reported.Organizers had planned to march through Tsim Sha Tsui to the west side of the district, where the high-speed train station to mainland China is located. Civil Human Rights Front Sham was one of the organizers of the event.Despite the police ban, protesters could still go ahead with the march. Activists mostly ignore restrictions on their gatherings and have continued to show up at events that lack police permits, with some devolving into violent clashes.On Friday night protesters formed human chains citywide, with everyone covering their faces in some way in defiance of the mask ban. People masqueraded as Disney characters, animals and super heroes, but the most popular mask was one of China President Xi Jinping. In Tsim Sha Tsui a long line of protesters linked hands, all wearing a facade of Xi’s smiling face.Lam may reshuffle ExCo (1 p.m.)Chief Executive Lam said she would consider reorganizing the city’s Executive Council, its de facto Cabinet, but would wait until protests had ended.The beleaguered leader of Hong Kong said on an RTHK radio program that she doesn’t “blindly” support the actions of each officer but fully supports the force in enforcing the law. She urged people to wait for a report from Independent Police Complaints Council into the recent clashes, RTHK said. Lam again rejected calls for an independent inquiry into police brutality, the latest coming from Chinese University’s vice-chancellor, Rocky Tuan.Taiwan gets letter (10:45 a.m.)Taiwan’s Criminal Investigation Bureau confirmed it had received a letter from the Hong Kong police offering assistance in the case of Chan Tong-kai, Central News Agency reported.There is no precedent for the cooperation and the Taiwan bureau will follow up with relevant departments for discussion, CNA reported.Homicide suspect to surrender himself to Taiwan (11:28 p.m.)Hong Kong’s Chief Executive received a letter Friday from Chan Tong-kai, a Hong Kong man who’s been accused of killing his pregnant girlfriend during a Valentine’s Day trip to Taiwan, saying that he’d decided to surrender himself to Taiwan, according to a statement on the website of Hong Kong’s government.Chan, who’s currently serving a prison sentence for money laundering in a Hong Kong jail, “requested the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government to assist him in making the relevant arrangement,” according to the statement.Hong Kong newspaper Sing Tao Daily reported earlier on Friday, citing a person it didn’t identify, that Chan made the decision after consulting with a pastor.Protesters march across city (1 p.m.)Demonstrators marched in the Central financial district on Hong Kong Island, temporarily blocking traffic, as well as in the Tsim Sha Tsui and Mong Kok neighborhoods of Kowloon. Some carried a banner calling on the Hong Kong government to agree to their five demands, which include an independent inquiry into police violence, an amnesty for arrested protesters and greater democratic freedoms.Police deny weekend permit (12:30 p.m.)Hong Kong police denied a protest permit for the Civil Human Rights Front’s planned march in Kowloon on Sunday. The group -- whose organizer Jimmy Sham was hospitalized this week -- has been behind some of the largest protests during the last five months, including a few that have drawn over one million people. In many cases, protesters have continued to show up at events that lack police permits, with some devolving into violent clashes with police.\--With assistance from Dominic Lau.To contact the reporter on this story: Iain Marlow in Hong Kong at [email protected] contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Scott at [email protected], Stanley JamesFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P. from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2BnLdsf via IFTTT

http://wwwspreadknowledge.blogspot.com/2019/10/protest-leaders-ignore-ban-call-for.html

#IFTTT #Blogger

0 notes

sweatygardencollectorblr · 5 years

Link

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2BnLdsf

#IFTTT #Blogger

0 notes

sky-seoroundtable · 3 months

Text

Established in 1998. Licensed by NYS Dept of ED and Nationally Accredited by COE. Medical Training Programs. Financial Aid if qualified and convenient and affordable payment plans to all our students. Flexible Day, Evening & Weekend Class Schedules. We are on the approved vendor list for Acces VR, NYS Dept of Labor, CSEA Union, 1199 Union and several other agencies. Our Careers Services Dept helps with job placement. Our dedication and honesty has let us serve our community by producing competent and respected medical professionals for over 20 years. For more info visit our website - https://accesscareers.net/

#CNA Training Queens #CNA Training Long Island

1 note · View note

joyfulcareercenter · 11 months

Text

Start Your Career with CNA Training on Long Island

Begin your healthcare career with CNA training on Long Island. Gain essential skills and knowledge through hands-on experience, expert instruction, and clinical rotations. Join a thriving industry with job stability and growth opportunities. Make a difference in patients' lives while enjoying competitive salaries and flexible schedules. Enroll today!

#CNA Training Long Island #CNA Training #CNA Courses #CNA Course #CNA Training in Long Island

0 notes

futuretechcareercenter · 25 days

Text

Understanding the Distinction: Caregiver vs. Personal Care Aide

When it comes to caregiver versus personal care aide (PCA) roles, the variance lies not only in the nomenclature but also in the scope of responsibilities and qualifications. These positions, while often used interchangeably, cater to distinct aspects of caregiving within the healthcare realm.

Caregiver:

A caregiver typically refers to an individual, often a family member or a hired professional, who provides assistance and support to individuals in need, usually within a home setting. The focus of a caregiver's duties revolves around emotional support, companionship, and household tasks, ensuring the overall well-being of the individual under their care.

In the context of CNA training in Long Island or PCA training in Long Island, caregiver roles may not always necessitate formal certification or training. Instead, caregivers rely on their inherent compassion and personal experiences to tend to the needs of their charges. However, formal training programs and certifications, such as those offered by Licensed by New York State Department of Education, can enhance a caregiver's skills and knowledge, particularly in areas such as medication management and specialized care.

Personal Care Aide (PCA):

On the other hand, a personal care aide (PCA) specializes in providing hands-on assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for individuals who require additional support due to age, illness, or disability. The role of a PCA often extends beyond companionship to encompass tasks such as bathing, dressing, grooming, and mobility assistance.

Evening PCA Class starting on June 3rd could be an opportunity for individuals aspiring to become PCAs to receive structured training that aligns with industry standards and regulations. This training equips them with essential skills in personal care, infection control, and communication techniques, preparing them for fulfilling careers in healthcare settings. Joyful Career Center provides you with the best CNA training in New York City.

Key Differences:

While both caregivers and PCAs share the common goal of enhancing the quality of life for those they serve, several differentiating factors set them apart:

Scope of Practice: PCAs primarily focus on providing hands-on assistance with ADLs, whereas caregivers may engage in a broader range of responsibilities, including emotional support and household chores.

Formal Training Requirements: PCAs often undergo formal training programs and obtain certifications to ensure proficiency in personal care techniques and safety protocols. In contrast, caregivers may rely on informal training or prior experience.

Regulatory Oversight: PCAs are subject to regulatory standards set by state agencies, such as the New York State Department of Education, to ensure the quality and consistency of care provided. Caregivers, while valuable members of the support network, may not fall under the same regulatory scrutiny.

Employment Settings: PCAs are commonly employed by home healthcare agencies, assisted living facilities, or nursing homes, where their specialized skills are in high demand. Caregivers, on the other hand, are often employed directly by individuals or families seeking personalized care within a home environment.

Conclusion:

In summary, while both caregivers and personal care aides play integral roles in supporting individuals with diverse needs, understanding the distinction between the two is crucial for individuals seeking care and for those aspiring to enter the healthcare field. Whether pursuing CNA training in Long Island or PCA training in Long Island, individuals can explore opportunities to acquire the necessary skills and certifications to excel in their chosen path of caregiving. Ultimately, both caregivers and PCAs contribute immensely to enhancing the quality of life and dignity of those they serve, embodying the essence of compassion and empathy in healthcare.

#CNA training in Long Island #PCA training in Long Island #Licensed by New York State Department of Education #Evening PCA Class starting on June 3rd

0 notes