Tumgik
#stravogin
Text
People sometime assume that Dostoevsky's work is serious stuff because of its dark and insightful themes but that hoe Stravrogin just kissed this woman in front of her husband and then bit the governors ear like RIP Dostoevsky you would have loved trashy reality tv
173 notes · View notes
centuries-of-thoughts · 11 months
Text
What I desire from books is to have my empathy increase, that’s what’s makes it a perfect 5/5 for me.
What Dostoevsky does is make stinky and questionable people lovable and tragic in a way that makes me question my own bias’s, even though I love The Brothers Karamazov the most, Demons is my soul. It’s the battle my soul experiences, and I often think: “what does it take to save/heal Stravogin/Krillov/Pytor/Ivan/etc.”
Fiction creates a space to be not only an Alyosha, but doing more than Aloysha. Fiction serves to teach and let us be willing to heal each other, thus we come closer to redemption, redeeming, and resurrecting this world.
2 notes · View notes
humanoid-lovers · 6 years
Photo
Tumblr media
it is spelled out by his portrayal of different characters and made convincing by how the reader identifies with and understands A very thought provoking portrait of combating and extreme personalities. As in all Dostoevsky's works, there is a very clear message; it is spelled out by his portrayal of different characters and made convincing by how the reader identifies with and understands both the evil and good present in the characters. Go to Amazon
Doestoevky's Demons are still around Demons was more difficult to follow than Dostoevsky's other works. There are numerous characters that make minor appearances that come and go in the first half of the novel. Once you get the characters straightened out, the novel becomes engrossing. Dostoevsky is a master of plot structure and characterization. The intricacy and unfolding of the plot are well worth the time it takes to organize who's who. The main character, Stavrogin, presents a mysterious influence over the other characters and throughout the novel. Pyotr Stepanovich is the most relatable to today because of his overt hatred and nihilism. Dostoevsky's prescience and understanding of evil are unparalleled when comparing his stories to the actual history that occurred after his time. Go to Amazon
You must read Russian Warning--this is the Russian edition of Dostoevsky's master work written in 1871-72. It is a combination political plot revolutionary terrorism and characters who test their rational free will and another who wishes to replace Christ with himself. It is one of Dostoevsky's masterpieces, written after The Idiot and before "The Raw Youth," which was followed by the Brothers Karamazov. Go to Amazon
Fyodor haz teh Psych Chops Most of my life I have dealt with families distorted by addiction or personality disorders. While I entirely understand and appreciate that there is FAR more to this and to "The Brothers K." than psychology, yet I am dazzled at the accuracy of Dostoyevsky's depiction of such things and his weaving them into wonderful stories. Go to Amazon
Dostoyevsky's Demons Clarified When I read previous translations of Demons, the titles always were The Possessed, so in each case the translators obscured the novel's meaning. Now, I think, after reading Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky's translation, I have been set straight. The demons, in part, are Puskin's goblins and witches, but in a much greater sense they are the lies (rationalism, materialism, anarchism, nihilism, atheism) that enter a man and woman's soul, and like the demons that came out of the man and entered the swine in Luke's Gospel, they drive the man or woman to destruction. Dostoyevsky connects the liberal idealists and freethinkers of 1840's Russia (they are the fathers and mothers) with the Nihilist Revolutionaries of the 1860's. He predicted the Bolshevik Revolution forty years before it happened, because he understood the essence of the revolutionary movement was not social Christianity but Nihilist destruction, from "unlimited freedom it would turn into unlimited despotism." Nikolai Stavrogin stands at the center of the novel, a sensualist, both good and evil, but more evil than good, because evil gives more pleasure. His demon is the thrill some find in danger, sadism, and moral depravity. Stavrogin is strikingly handsome and a taciturn aristocrat, so he is not without glamor. He is mentor to Ivan Shatov, a reformed Nihilist revolutionary, to Pyotr Verkhovensky, the Nihilist revolutionary leader, and to Kirillov, the man-godhead. The novel begins with Stepan Trofimovich Verkhovensky's story, he a liberal of the `40's who continues his rant under the sponsorship of Varvara Petrovna, Stravogin's mother, in a Russian provincial town, where Pyotr Verkhovensky, Stepan Trofimovich's abandoned son, decides to test his Nihilist theories. I never paid much attention to Stepan Trofimovich's story before, but I did this time, as I did to the point of view of the novel's narrator-chronicler, a settler in the provincial town. I read the novel as a coherent whole, not a shipshod piece like before. Memorable female characters include Marya Ignatievna, a cripple half-wit, married to Stravogin on a whim, Lizaveta Nikolaevna Tushin, infatuated with Stavrogin, and Darya Pavlovna (Dasha) Shatov, devoted to Stavrogin. The Foreward and End Notes to the novel are excellent. Humor comes from such unexpected people as Fedka the Convict, an evil soul Dostoyevsky knew well, having spent ten years in a Siberian prison and in exile for his "revolutionary activities." Demons affected me tremendously. Its intellectual power enveloped me in realization after realization Go to Amazon
Nice quality! ... attention as the Brothers K and this is the best translation. In fact Four Stars The Dangers of Nihilism This is an absorbing novel, full of extreme and ... It’s a book! Marvelous Dostoevsky! Five Stars Five Stars Five Stars
0 notes