#prioritizing china in foreign policy

[a-god-in-ruins-rises]

only just heard of this vivek ramaswamy guy last night. i’ll have to do more research on the guy but what little i’ve heard of him in the last 24 hours has piqued my interest. he definitely has the sort of energy that i think the republican party needs to stay relevant in the future.

#i don't want to praise him too much before i do more research #but bro talks about merit-based immigration #prioritizing china in foreign policy #he seems to imply increasing tariffs #he wants to eradicate wokeness and affirmative action #he literally expressed a desire to use the military to put down cartels south of the border #lmaoooo #like idk dude sounds pretty good to me #plus he's pagan to boot

[read-marx-and-lenin]

I hope you don't mind my asking, you seem well-read and reasonable so I thought you might be able to help here - I'm a British communist trying to find a good organisation to join, there's tons of communist parties here but every time I search for opinions on one I either find out they're transphobic or see a bunch of people dismiss them as Trotskyist timewasters. Forgive me if the question seems a bit naïve, but how much do you think that sectarianism really matters these days?

I don't presently claim to be any specific form of communist, I've just read some Marx and some Lenin and agree with what they say, and when trying to familiarise myself with the various inter-factional conflicts I'm just not really seeing how relevant it is here - yes, some American Trots in the 50s ended up reactionary, and some MLs are concerningly eager to downplay the harm their favourite leaders caused, and everyone argues over the current state of China, but...how much does any of this really matter to building a revolutionary movement in 21st century Britain? Isn't it better to just find an active group and get to work building class consciousness than to dismiss each other for having the wrong opinions on shit that happened 70 years ago?

I can't recommend any British orgs as I don't live in the UK, but in general, if you find an organization that is actively doing work in your community that you agree with and want to support, then you should consider joining them even if they don't 100% align with your beliefs. Joining an organization is not a permanent life-altering decision, and you can leave if it turns out it's not for you.

I don't think you're conflating transphobia and sectarianism here, but I feel like I need to state that bigotry in general is not petty sectarianism, it's just bigotry. Racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or otherwise reactionary orgs are not worth your time, even if you like the other things they say or do. We've all seen what happens when supposedly leftist organizations pander to social conservatives.

I don't think an organization has to take a stance on Soviet foreign policy or the events of the Russian Revolution in order to be a good organization. I think an organization can talk shit about Stalin or Mao and still be worthwhile to participate in, even if I think they're parroting Western propaganda. As long as they have are class-conscious, in favor of revolution and are doing good work in the community, then they're already better than the liberals and reformists. Even working with reformists can be a good first step when you're dealing with a lack of decent left-wing organization. I wouldn't work directly with liberal orgs, though, they're dead ends.

No organization will ever match your own personal politics and opinions. Organizations are made up of people who will naturally have a variety of different beliefs and opinions. It is a matter of organizational discipline to be able to handle these disputes and turn them into something productive. Low discipline is what creates splits and factionalism.

An organization that is hyper-focused on one specific and dogmatic ideological line that cares more about ideological purity than about actually doing real work is just as bad as a big tent party that prioritizes raw numbers above a coherent message and platform. Some sectarianism is necessary to ensure an organization even has a point to its existence. If you can't reliably and honestly say "we are not liberals", for instance, then what actually distinguishes you from liberals beyond the color of your rhetoric? Too much sectarianism, and you end up excluding folks who would otherwise be willing to support your cause over petty nonsense.

If an organization isn't dismissing you for ideological reasons and you see that they're doing good work, then I would say give them a shot. If they're not doing good work or they won't accept the help of someone who isn't already in line with their specific ideology, then why should you want to join them?

A counter-productive org is worse than no org, but no org is worse than a less-than-perfect org. Honest mistakes and shortcomings can be corrected over time. So long as the organization is demonstrably dedicated to dismantling capitalism and liberating the working class, then I don't see why you shouldn't consider working with them.

#anon ask #communism #socialism #leftism #anti capitalism

[lesbianchemicalplant]

I can't bring myself to praise china for doing the absolute bare minimum for palestine. I understand why they prioritize trading with everyone as a rule, I understand why they're so UN-pilled, I'm still not going to heap praise on mild diplomatic efforts when they could apply actual leverage but will not do so. I don't think recognizing the limits of this aspect of china's foreign policy is Ultraleftist. they have their policy, this is part of it, I'm taking it for what it is (and not better than what it is)

#call me undialectical but I can't cast this in a sunny light and don't see much point in trying to #:/

[phoenixyfriend]

International Taxes

Ko-Fi prompt from Ethan:

All I know about tariffs is that they're special taxes for international trade but people talk about them all the time. Please help explain

So we are going to talk about three things here:

Tariffs

VAT

Customs/Duties

I'll be using the US for most of my examples, because that's what I know best... and also because it's a very convenient example for the way VAT works on an international level.

Tariffs

You are correct that tariffs are special taxes for international trade. These are essentially fees that are applied to products being shipped in and out of a country in order to promote domestic product or impact a foreign one.

A common example is US steel. The United States has a fairly robust steel industry, and the government promotes that industry domestically by applying tariffs to imports. Back in 2018, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on steel imports and 10% on aluminum (something that the WTO said was illegal, but that's not relevant right now). The steel tariff had previously been a range of 8-30%, implemented by Bush in 2002. Prior to that, the steel tariff had generally been under 1%.

In applying that tariff, the federal government prioritized domestic purchasing. If domestic product is nominally $90 for one unit, and foreign product is $80, then it is cheaper and more appealing to buy from a foreign producer. With a 25% tariff, the foreign product is now functionally $100 per unit, making it more appealing to buy domestically. While the actual cost of the tax is born by the producing country, in the case of import tariffs, the result is the raising of costs when selling internationally.

Tariffs are also applied to specific countries. Once again using a Trump example, a $50 billion tariff was applied against China in 2018. This had negative impacts on the economy, as it led to worries of a trade war; China did retaliate by applying tariffs directly to specific products from the US, including wine and pork.

High tariffs theoretically lead to an increase in domestic trade, but they also lead to higher rates of smuggling. They are also a form protectionist policy, which was at its height in the 19th century for the US.

VAT - Value Added Tax

If you look up VAT, you get a lot of explanations that talk about how it is a tax that is levied against the consumer on the basis of the cumulative value of the product, and generally things are confusingly worded, so I'll save you some time:

It's sales tax.

If you are American like me, that's all it is. It's a different name for sales tax.

You get something for $8 at the store, but the final cost is $8.42? Those 42 cents are the VAT.

What does that have to do with international trade? Isn't that a domestic thing?

Well, yes and no. We'll start by comparing the US to most European countries.

See, the US has a different application of VAT than a lot of other places. In the US, sales tax is added at the very end of a purchase for the vast majority of places. This is because there is no federal sales tax. Instead, taxes are set by the state, county, and city governments. Take a look at this map of New York, and you'll see how much sales tax varies by just a few miles.

Given how much a pricing can vary from one town to the next, large corporations generate a greater profit by listing prices in their pre-tax form, and then adding that tax at the end. The consumer knows that there will be a higher price at the counter than is listed, because the standard in the US is to not include that tax. So your Arizona Iced Tea will be a $1 in Portland and $1 in Queens County, matching that promise on the can... but you'll still be paying $1 in Portland and $1.09 in Queens, because only one of those areas has sales tax, despite both being in the same country.

This works out for the retailer, because the consumer does not blame them for raising prices across county lines, if there is a sales tax hike. The thought of "it's cheaper ten miles down the road, I'll get to it later," followed by never getting to it and thus never making a purchase, is rarer, because the listed price is still the same. It also means having to print or design fewer price tags; imagine having to manually change every price in a supermarket magazine! Every coupon needs to have its price changed by a few cents, to account for tax!

...or you can just print the same magazine with the same prices and write "plus tax" after the listed cost.

All this to say, Americans are used to adding sales tax at the end, and knowing that the price they see is not the price they'll pay.

Other countries Do Not Do This.

I mean, some do. But we're talking about the ones that don't, which includes the entirety of the EU, India, some of Japan, and the country I actually have extensive experience with: Serbia.

I am currently in Serbia, which means I'm in a country with a sales tax/VAT that is higher than I'm used to (20% on most goods, 8% on essentials). In every store I've been to, the tax is included in the listed price. If it says 87 rsd on a carton of milk, I will be paying 87 rsd at checkout. The baseline price is 80 rsd, and then there's the 8% tax, and the final price is 86.4, which gets rounded up to the 87 that is listed on the tag.

If you aren't accustomed to thinking about VAT like in the US, online shopping can be... a trial.

If I purchase something from, say, Canada, and have it mailed to the US, I am given the sales tax as part of the purchasing process. It will format the receipt as the product plus sales tax. This is familiar to me.

To someone from the EU who does not purchase internationally (specifically from the US, Canada, or other countries that don't include sales tax in the sticker price), this tax can often come as a surprise.

And, finally, in some cases... the will be paid at the very end, at the point of pickup, along with customs. I recently purchased something from an English creator that was manufactured in Germany and then shipped to Serbia. I anticipated that I had paid the VAT for Serbia when purchasing the product. It was instead added at the point of purchase, as Serbia is neither in the EU nor in a trade agreement with the relevant countries that would allow for me to pay the VAT online, I had to pay the 20% in addition to customs when picking up the package from the postal office.

Despite not being a tariff or customs/duty payment, VAT can have a direct impact on international purchasing.

Customs/Duties

Customs and duties are taxes applied to products based on those product characteristics.

There is overlap with tariffs. As a consumer, you are... not going to be very affected by the difference between customs and tariffs.

Customs are like VAT, in that they are paid by the consumer rather than by the manufacturer.

You can think of tariffs as a fee that a manufacturer pays to sell something internationally (though that cost is often passed on to the consumer), and customs as a fee paid by a consumer to receive that good.

Hope this helps!

(And if anyone here is more familiar with the subject than I am, please feel free to add on or correct me! I'm generally pretty good about international policy, but I'm not an expert, and this subject can be a complicated one.)

(Prompt me on ko-fi!)

#taxes #tariffs #taxation #customs #duties #sales tax #vat #phoenix posts #ko fi #ko fi prompts #economics #ko-fi #economics prompts

[mariacallous]

Foreign policy is likely to feature prominently at the Republican presidential primary debates. At the debate in August, a question on whether the candidates would support continued U.S. assistance to Ukraine produced a firestorm. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who had previously suggested that Russia’s war in Ukraine was not a “vital” national interest, appeared skeptical, calling on Europe to do more instead. Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy was more direct in opposing such aid, calling it “disastrous” for the United States to be “protecting against an invasion across somebody else’s border.” Former Vice President Mike Pence and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, on the other hand, expressed strong support for assisting Ukraine, effectively standing behind President Joe Biden’s efforts to counter Russian aggression while imploring the United States to do even more.

On the other side of the aisle, some Democrats have been wary of Biden’s policy on Ukraine, as evidenced by a letter (that was later retracted) sent to the president by progressive Democrats, calling for a diplomatic end to the conflict and potential sanctions relief for Russia.

In today’s polarized political atmosphere, such cross-cutting views may appear confounding. On most domestic policy issues, whether political leaders have an R or a D next to their name is often a pretty good guide to their take on any particular issue. But when it comes to foreign policy, the normal rules of politics do not apply. Instead, of much greater relevance is where a political leader falls on the foreign-policy ideology spectrum.

The schools of thought that make up this spectrum, reflecting fundamentally different views about the U.S. role in the world, are highly influential but not very well understood.

In seeking to differentiate between foreign-policy positions, the media often resorts to cliches, such as “hawks versus doves,” or buzzwords, such as “isolationist” and “neoconservative.” However, these terms tend to be oversimplified or exaggerated and convey little useful information. International relations theories are not all that helpful either. “Realism” is routinely conflated with an academic concept that predicts how nations can be expected to behave, rather than how they should. And other theories, such as “idealism” and “constructivism,” offer limited utility in understanding real-world decision-making.

Yet there are critical differences in how policymakers view the world and are seeking to influence the direction of U.S. foreign policy. There is a clear dichotomy, for instance, between those who believe that U.S. influence is mostly positive and that the United States should play an active role in global affairs and those who believe that U.S. hubris more often leads to bad outcomes and want to scale back the country’s overseas commitments.

There is a significant divide between those who believe that the United States should prioritize efforts to advance democratic values and norms and those who believe in defending more narrow strategic interests. And there are disparate views on whether the United States should stand firm against adversaries, such as Russia and China, or should seek to find common ground.

I have delineated six distinct foreign-policy camps that represent the dominant strains of thinking on the U.S. role in the world. These camps can be placed along a spectrum of international engagement. Four of them fall on the more assertive side of this spectrum, constituting “internationalists,” who believe that the United States should exercise its influence and be actively engaged in global affairs. And two of the camps are “non-internationalists,” who believe that the United States should scale back its global commitments and adopt a less forward-leaning foreign policy.

1. Unilateral Internationalists

Defining worldview: Unilateral internationalists believe U.S. primacy and freedom of action are paramount and prioritize unilateral U.S. action, unconstrained by alliances or international agreements, to advance strategic interests. While President George W. Bush came close, especially during his first term, no U.S. president has directly embraced this school.

Key attributes:

View China and Russia as the greatest challenges to U.S. primacy in the international system and seek to exert maximum pressure to counter U.S. adversaries and project American power

Prioritize U.S. national interests, even if at the expense of allies, and favor strategic interests over democratic values or a “rules-based order”—but support U.S. alliances while skeptical of allies’ willingness to act

Are distrustful of the United Nations and international agreements and favor U.S. withdrawal from international institutions where necessary to avoid restraints on U.S. power and sovereignty

Support using military force to advance U.S. interests

Prominent voices: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton

Recent U.S. presidents: None

Republican candidates: None

s the second most assertive of six camps.

2. Democratic Internationalists

Defining worldview: Democratic internationalists believe that defending democracy is essential to maintaining U.S. and global security and prioritize working with like-minded allies to advance shared values and a rules-based democratic order. This school has been predominant among elected U.S. leaders—across both political parties—since President Harry Truman declared it was the policy of the United States to help “free and independent nations to maintain their freedom.”

Key attributes:

View strategic competition between democracy and autocracy as the major fault line in the international system and support proactive measures to defend against revisionist autocracies, namely China and Russia

Are strong proponents of democratic alliances and solidarity and are eager to maintain the United States’ role as the “leader of the free world”

Support robust efforts to advance democratic values and human rights and to hold autocratic regimes to account for war crimes and violent oppression

Are willing to consider use of force if necessary to defend democracy and the rules-based order

Prominent voices: Madeleine Albright, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Chris Coons, G. John Ikenberry, Hal Brands

Recent U.S. presidents: Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Joe Biden

Republican candidates: Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, Mike Pence

ost assertive of six camps.

3. Realist Internationalists

Defining worldview: Realist internationalists believe that U.S. power should be utilized to defend more narrow strategic interests and prioritize pragmatic engagement with all nations to help preserve global and regional stability. Former National Security Advisors Brent Scowcroft and Henry Kissinger were quintessential practitioners of this school, which was also embraced by the presidents they served.

Key attributes:

View great-power rivalry as inevitable in the global system and support U.S. alliances and active efforts to deter rival powers and maintain global order

Are willing to engage adversaries and work with all nations, regardless of regime type, to advance strategic objectives

Are prepared to make mutual accommodations with rivals, or seek to divide them, to achieve a stable balance of power

Are inclined to “accept the world as it is” and are wary of U.S. intervention and democracy promotion efforts

Support a strong U.S. defense posture and are willing to use force when required to defend vital national interests

Prominent voices: Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft, Robert Gates, Richard Haass, Stephen Krasner, Charles Kupchan

Recent U.S. presidents: Richard Nixon, George H.W. Bush

Republican candidates: Ron DeSantis

4. Multilateral Internationalists

Defining worldview: Multilateral internationalists believe that peaceful coexistence with other nations should be a key objective and prioritize working through the U.N. and other multilateral institutions to solve global challenges and uphold international norms. President Barack Obama’s foreign policy was steeped in this school, now represented by former Secretary of State John Kerry, who is currently serving as the United States’ chief climate negotiator.

Key attributes:

Are wary of great-power rivalry and strategic competition and are eager to “extend a hand” and find areas of common ground with adversaries

Support active U.S. engagement to advance global norms, good governance, and human rights

Seek to cooperate with all nations to address transnational challenges, with a particular priority on climate change

Prefer to engage through inclusive institutions but support working with U.S. alliances to foster a rules-based order

Are disinclined to use military force and will consider it only when authorized by the U.N. Security Council

Prominent voices: John Kerry, Bruce Jones

Recent U.S. presidents: Barack Obama

Republican candidates: None

Non-Internationalists

1. Retractors

Defining worldview: Retractors believe that the world is taking advantage of the United States and support a more transactional foreign policy that seeks to retract the United States from global commitments and maximize pecuniary benefits. President Donald Trump’s foreign policy epitomizes this school. But its adherents date back to Republican presidential candidate Pat Buchanan in the late 1990s and the America First movement of the 1930s that sought to keep the United States out of World War II.

Key attributes:

Are deeply cynical about values and norms and seek and are prone to conspiracy theories and suspect the role of the “deep state” in manipulating U.S. policy

Are critical of alliances and disdainful of U.S. allies, particularly in Europe, and believe efforts to cooperate through international institutions are naive and self-defeating

Seek to “make deals” with autocratic regimes and are dismissive of democratic values and international norms

Emphasize economic protectionism and closed borders to prevent others from “ripping America off”

Believe the United States is militarily overcommitted but support occasional limited military actions to “act tough” and demonstrate U.S. prowess

Prominent voices: Michael Anton

Recent U.S. presidents: Donald Trump

Republican candidates: Donald Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy

2. Restrainers

Defining worldview: Restrainers believe that the United States is overstretched and overcommitted and support a more restrained foreign policy that significantly reduces the country’s global footprint. While still largely on the margins, this school has gained some prominence in recent years, as reflected by the emergence of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and its adherents.

Key attributes: 

Are distrustful of U.S. power and influence in the international system and believe that the United States has no standing to promote democratic values or a rules-based order, given its own flawed democracy, hypocrisy, and imperialism

Believe the United States has picked unnecessary fights with adversaries and that its overseas military posture, alliances, and sanctions policies are often overly provocative

Are wary of “inflating” threats posed by China and Russia and favor diplomatic efforts to cooperate with adversaries and reach a mutual accommodation and view a nationalistic foreign policy as arrogant and distasteful

Seek to reduce the U.S. military presence overseas and to scale back commitments to NATO and other alliances and vigorously oppose the use of force

Prominent voices: Rand Paul, Bernie Sanders, Andrew Bacevich, Stephen M. Walt, Stephen Wertheim

Recent U.S. presidents: None

Republican candidates: None

Several key points follow from this analysis. First, admittedly, the edges of these camps are fuzzy, and policymakers may often find themselves straddling one or more of these camps, especially on specific issues. Nevertheless, these six schools are sufficiently discrete and represent the primary worldviews that are influencing the contemporary debate on how the United States should conduct its foreign policy.

Second, many of these schools tend to cross partisan lines. Democratic internationalism, for example, has been enthusiastically embraced by political leaders on both sides of the aisle and has strong bipartisan constituencies, as reflected in pro-democracy institutions such as the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute. Realism has also had a long tradition in U.S. foreign policy, resonating with national security practitioners across both parties. Similarly, the restraint school draws support among both progressives on the left and libertarians looking for Washington to scale back its global commitments. On the other hand, unilateral internationalism has found a home mainly among conservatives, while multilateral internationalism draws support mostly from liberals. In recent years, retraction has become the policy of choice among pro-Trump Republicans.

Third, determining where recent U.S. presidents fall on this spectrum is not axiomatic. While they may be inclined toward a particular camp as they enter office, most presidents are not purists, and as they govern, many find themselves running up against practical and political realities that make it difficult to maintain a consistent and predictable foreign-policy governing philosophy.

Barack Obama, for example, seemed drawn toward realist internationalism, pursuing a “reset” in relations with Russia and later declining to commit U.S. force to hold Syrian President Bashar al-Assad accountable for his use of chemical weapons. But given the priority Obama placed on engaging adversaries such as Cuba and Iran and working through the United Nations, the main thrust of his foreign policy appeared more consistent with multilateral internationalism.

George W. Bush also straddled various camps. In launching the global war on terrorism, Bush seemed determined to assert U.S. primacy and appeared to be leaning toward unilateral internationalism. But with his emphasis on democracy promotion in Iraq and Afghanistan, his signature Freedom Agenda, and his call for “ending tyranny in our world” in his second inaugural address, Bush’s overall worldview appeared to be more grounded in democratic internationalism.

Where Biden falls is still up for debate. Currently, the Biden national security team is split between realists, who pressed for Biden to withdraw from Afghanistan and reengage with Saudi Crown Prince Muhammed bin Sultan, and democratic internationalists, who championed the president’s initiative to organize a Summit for Democracy. However, given Biden’s steadfast commitment to work with NATO to defend a democratic Ukraine and his conviction that the world is facing a “global struggle between democracy and autocracy,” the broad arc of the Biden administration’s foreign policy so far seems to be more consistent with democratic internationalism—though a more definitive judgment will have to wait until his presidency concludes.

So where does this leave the current slate of Republican candidates? Pence and Haley, as well as former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, all of whom have called for standing up against Russian aggression and have denounced China’s human rights violations, are squarely in the democratic internationalist camp. Donald Trump, of course, has his own lane. DeSantis and Ramaswamy, on the other hand, appear caught between realism and Trumpian retraction, as they battle for support among the Republican rank and file who are skeptical of U.S. global engagement. DeSantis favors a pivot away from Ukraine and toward China—a very realist way to think about trade-offs. Ramaswamy, who has called for a strategy to split Russia and China, also sounds like a realist at times, but his stance on extricating the United States from any involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war, potentially ceding Taiwan to China, and putting the “interests of America first” seems to suggest he is veering toward retraction.

While voters may not consider foreign policy to be central to their vote for the next president, how U.S. leaders choose to engage in the world is critical to the security and prosperity of the American people. By gaining a clearer understanding of the most influential foreign-policy schools of thought, voters—and indeed the candidates themselves—will be in a better position to make informed choices.

[warsofasoiaf]

Interesting debate. Tankies are gonna tank, but Tiara made some odd claims for someone with their knowledge. Do you agree with Tiara's claim that the PRC is "the most powerful right-wing government on the planet"? Tiara also agreed with the tankie about cutting excess military spending. If one believes America should challenge Chinese and Russian imperialism, doesn't that call for an increase in military spending?

Pre-emptively tagging @opinions-about-tiaras, because unlike that tankie, I don't hide in the comments.

When I mention that the left-right spectrum is overly binary and limiting, this is precisely what I mean. China's place on this spectrum depends entirely on how you choose to define it. For some, left and right is seen as left pursuing social equality and egalitarianism while the right promotes a social hierarchy. In that sense, China's heavily unequal, hierarchal, ethnostate-focused politics, with a foreign policy dedicated to turning Southeast Asia into client-states would place that firmly on the right. For others, left and right is seen as the degree by which the state intervenes and controls in the economy, and China's economic policy would place it on the left. For my take, I don't really use the left-right spectrum save in specific contexts, so I can't really say that I agree or disagree with that statement.

One thing I will disagree with him on is calling China "capitalist." It's a common refrain among China-critical progressives to call China capitalist, but for my take, China appears to be very clearly cleaving to the old corporatist model that was common to the fascist states of earlier eras. It's not like having ultra-wealthy members of society is limited to capitalist countries alone - the elites of the Soviet Union were quite wealthy (and in the 1950's, income inequality was greater in the Soviet Union than the United States). But corporatism these days is largely a forgotten economic discipline, barely of interest to anyone who doesn't study the early 20th century and the actual economics of fascism, so I don't blame anyone for not knowing that.

Similarly, cutting military spending is a common policy goal among the left-liberal movement, so that's very much on-brand for a self-described "left-liberal." While I personally don't agree that we should cut military spending (although I think we should spend it in a wiser fashion), it's not exactly abnormal to think that - it's just an expression of where he believes that the limited resources should be allocated and in what proportions. There's plenty of ways to challenge Chinese and Russian imperialism without increasing the military budget. In fact, I support many of these ways: partnering with allies (Biden's work in improving the South Korea-Japan relationship as an example), investment in countries that need infrastructure (this one in particular has a lot of added benefits, particularly when it comes to climate - yet another reason I'm critical of the current dialogue regarding climate), and asymmetric defense capabilities to enforce deterrence (like we're doing with Taiwan). Each of them have benefits and drawbacks and any President must effectively manage those risks, that's just part of the nature of being a head of state. OOT's choice in that regard is simply a matter of prioritization and budgeting accordingly, it's neither hypocritical nor foolish.

Thanks for the question, Anon.

SomethingLikeALawyer, Hand of the King

#china #modern politics

[f1ghtsoftly]

Im being real I only want to organize with other women but my interest in like passing laws vs direct action is literally zero.

Laws are helpful, but they are ultimately reformist. I think, coming out of the 20th century a major takeaway I had is that women need to build things that cannot be taken away from us (basically separatism). Abortion should have never been a debate, it’s a right, if a government tries to legislate that then it is illegitimate. Women’s work should be paid. Women should run households. No women should be forced to live under constant threat of rape or battery. Sex is about love and connection not about owning someone (or their children). None of these things are complicated. Women understand this reality intuitively. It is men who do not. By asking rather than taking-we in turn legitimate this source of power but, men should not hold power over women. It is illegitimate.

The biggest failure, in my opinion, of second wave feminism in the US is it could not reproduce itself. I agree with Federici’s assessment that “Wages for Housework” (or some variation) is one of the biggest tasks left undone. By and large child production in the US remains a task for the nuclear family, ensuring patriarchy will live on for another generation and another generation of adult women will suffer inside of it. We can remedy this by creating intentional communities of women by women, raising our own wages and collectively supporting each other through family creation and in the workplace.

Furthermore, I really strongly encourage women to stop supporting causes, political movements or organizations that refuse to prioritize women’s issues. This is particularly relevant in the realm of foreign policy. I find it repulsive how many self styled radical feminists turn around and support US imperial projects abroad. We must reshape the way we organize the production of commodities if we are to liberate women. That means *not* supporting the imperialist powers in their quest to secure new markets and create sources of cheap labor+raw materials. Women’s piss poor wages in garment factories in Bangladesh is directly related to the strength of the conservative patriarchy in Bangladesh. Subsistance farmers in Brazil and South Asia need women to produce a large workforce as cheaply as possible, they accomplish this through patriarchal marriage and religion. The US forced it’s way into Eastern Europe to secure new markets and access to raw materials and the looting of the Soviet State saw the largest entrance of women into the sex trade in world history. Im not saying be uncritical about places like Iran, China or Russia, but I am saying be mindful of what exactly the person speaking intends to do about it. Global revolution is different than a proxy war between US+friends, solidarity with striking workers is different than Sanctions and Embargos which starve women and children. NGO’s operate in the interest of their donors, whoever they happen to be. Both horrors can be true and we must develop the capacity to see all of them-so that our intention to help does not untinentionally prolong the suffering of our global sisters. I cannot be more adamant that vigorous opposition to imperialism, vigorous opposition to the US government and her military is the absolute best way those of us living in the west can support women globally.

Many women are fooled by the belief that this is impractical and centering women and demanding real, revolutionary change is hopeless but allow me to ask you this, how many women have lived and died under this current regime? How many women have given their lives, have devoted themselves entirely to women’s advancement? We have made small gains-but it is not nearly commiserate to the effort we have put into achieving them. We are staring down the barrel of a new age, one where women’s bodies can be spliced and sold like pieces of meat. One where religious fundamentalism will remain a dominant global force. One where women can look forward to lives as drudges, whores or wives living with back to back pregnancies, constantly under the boot of men. Is that the world we want? Is that the world women have worked so hard to achieve?

We need a more radical, more prideful strategy befitting our dignity and in line with what we deserve. We deserve so much more than concessions. We deserve freedom and the fruits of our labor.

So please, consider that it is ok for you to be the main character in this story and stop lending your time, support and energy to causes that do not center women’s experiences. I don’t care if you’re “also lgbtq” or also a “poc” or also “colonized”. You’re suffering more than a man is, women deserve to be at the forefront of every single social movement, not a supporting role, a woman unfairly in prison is just as significant as her male counterpart. Lesbians get beat up and preyed on by homophobic men just as much, if not more, then gay men do. Women suffer worse under occupying armies, women suffer worse under sanctions, women suffer worse in post colonial political chaos then men do.

You matter just as much as they do and you need to *leave* if they do not recognize that. You will never lose by recognizing your worth.

#this is dedicated to this one ivy leauge radical feminist who hated women and also like wanted a war with china like #why is everyone in the poli sci department at columbia the most hawkish freak I have ever met #what do they do to you there. #im soooo grateful I studied history over poli sci like #radblr #radical feminism #radical feminist #radfems #radical feminist theory #radical feminists do touch #radfem safe #gender critical #char is writing theory again

[xtruss]

Analysis: The China-Russia Axis Takes Shape

The bond has been decades in the making, but Russia’s war in Ukraine has tightened their embrace.

— September 11, 2023 | By Bonny Lin | Foreign Policy

Alex Nabaum Illustration For Foreign Policy

In July, nearly a dozen Chinese and Russian warships conducted 20 combat exercises in the Sea of Japan before beginning a 2,300-nautical-mile joint patrol, including into the waters near Alaska. These two operations, according to the Chinese defense ministry, “reflect the level of the strategic mutual trust” between the two countries and their militaries.

The increasingly close relationship between China and Russia has been decades in the making, but Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has tightened their embrace. Both countries made a clear strategic choice to prioritize relations with each other, given what they perceive as a common threat from the U.S.-led West. The deepening of bilateral ties is accompanied by a joint push for global realignment as the two countries use non-Western multilateral institutions—such as the BRICS forum and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)—to expand their influence in the developing world. Although neither Beijing nor Moscow currently has plans to establish a formal military alliance, major shocks, such as a Sino-U.S. conflict over Taiwan, could yet bring it about.

The cover of Foreign Policy's fall 2023 print magazine shows a jack made up of joined hands lifting up the world. Cover text reads: The Alliances That Matter Now: Multilateralism is at a dead end, but powerful blocs are getting things done."

China and Russia’s push for better relations began after the end of the Cold War. Moscow became frustrated with its loss of influence and status, and Beijing saw itself as the victim of Western sanctions after its forceful crackdown of the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989. In the 1990s and 2000s, the two countries upgraded relations, settled their disputed borders, and deepened their arms sales. Russia became the dominant supplier of advanced weapons to China.

When Xi Jinping assumed power in 2012, China was already Russia’s largest trading partner, and the two countries regularly engaged in military exercises. They advocated for each other in international forums; in parallel, they founded the SCO and BRICS grouping to deepen cooperation with neighbors and major developing countries.

When the two countries upgraded their relations again in 2019, the strategic drivers for much closer relations were already present. Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 damaged its relations with the West and led to a first set of economic sanctions. Similarly, Washington identified Beijing as its most important long-term challenge, redirected military resources to the Pacific, and launched a trade war against Chinese companies. Moscow and Beijing were deeply suspicious of what they saw as Western support for the color revolutions in various countries and worried that they might be targets as well. Just as China refused to condemn Russian military actions in Chechnya, Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, Russia fully backed Chinese positions on Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang. The Kremlin also demonstrated tacit support for Chinese territorial claims against its neighbors in the South China Sea and East China Sea.

Since launching its war in Ukraine, Russia has become China’s fastest-growing trading partner. Visiting Moscow in March, Xi declared that deepening ties to Russia was a “strategic choice” that China had made. Even the mutiny in June by Wagner Group leader Yevgeny Prigozhin that took his mercenary army almost to the gates of Moscow did not change China’s overall position toward Russia, though Beijing has embraced tactical adjustments to “de-risk” its dependency on Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Building on their strong relationship, Xi and Putin released a joint statement in February 2022 announcing a “No Limits” strategic partnership between the two countries. The statement expressed a litany of grievances against the United States, while Chinese state media hailed a “new era” of international relations not defined by Washington. Coming only a few weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, enhanced relations were likely calculated by Moscow to strengthen its overall geopolitical position before the attack.

It’s not clear how much prior detailed knowledge Xi had about Putin’s plans to launch a full-scale war, but their relationship endured the test. If anything, the Western response to Russia’s war reinforced China’s worst fears, further pushing it to align with Russia. Beijing viewed Russian security concerns about NATO expansion as legitimate and expected the West to address them as it sought a way to prevent or stop the war. Instead, the United States, the European Union, and their partners armed Ukraine and tried to paralyze Russia with unprecedented sanctions. Naturally, this has amplified concerns in Beijing that Washington and its allies could be similarly unaccommodating toward Chinese designs on Taiwan.

Against the background of increased mutual threat perceptions, both sides are boosting ties with like-minded countries. On one side, this includes a reenergized, expanded NATO and its growing linkages to the Indo-Pacific, as well as an invigoration of Washington’s bilateral, trilateral, and minilateral arrangements in Asia. Developed Western democracies—with the G-7 in the lead—are also exploring how their experience deterring and sanctioning Russia could be leveraged against China in potential future contingencies.

On the other side, Xi envisions the China-Russia partnership as the foundation for shaping “the global landscape and the future of humanity.” Both countries recognize that while the leading democracies are relatively united, many countries in the global south remain reluctant to align with either the West or China and Russia. In Xi and Putin’s view, winning support in the global south is key to pushing back against what they consider U.S. hegemony.

Alex Nabaum Illustration For Foreign Policy

In the global multilateral institutions, China and Russia are coordinating with each other to block the United States from advancing agendas that do not align with their interests. The U.N. Security Council is often paralyzed by their veto powers, while other institutions have turned into battlegrounds for seeking influence. Beijing and Moscow view the G-20, where their joint weight is relatively greater, as a key forum for cooperation.

But the most promising venues are BRICS and the SCO, established to exclude the developed West and anchor joint Chinese-Russian efforts to reshape the international system. Both are set up for expansion—in terms of scope, membership, and other partnerships. They are the primary means for China and Russia to create a web of influence that increasingly ties strategically important countries to both powers.

The BRICS grouping—initially made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—is at the heart of Moscow and Beijing’s efforts to build a bloc of economically powerful countries to resist what they call Western “Unilateralism.” In late August, another six states, including Egypt, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, were invited to join the group. With their growing economic power, the BRICS countries are pushing for cooperation on a range of issues, including ways to reduce the dominance of the U.S. dollar and stabilize global supply chains against Western calls for “Decoupling” and “De-risking.” Dozens of other countries have expressed interest in joining BRICS.

The SCO, in contrast, is a Eurasian grouping of Russia, China, and their friends. With the exception of India, all are members of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The accession of Iran in July and Belarus’s membership application put the SCO on course to bring China’s and Russia’s closest and strongest military partners under one umbrella. If the SCO substantially deepens security cooperation, it could grow into a counterweight against U.S.-led Coalitions.

Both BRICS and the SCO, however, operate by consensus, and it will take time to transform both groups into cohesive, powerful geopolitical actors that can function like the G-7 or NATO. The presence of India in both groups will make it difficult for China and Russia to turn either into a staunchly anti-Western outfit. The diversity of members—which include democracies and autocracies with vastly different cultures—means that China and Russia will have to work hard to ensure significant influence over each organization and its individual members.

What’s next? Continued Sino-Russian convergence is the most likely course. But that is not set in stone—and progress can be accelerated, slowed, or reversed. Absent external shocks, Beijing and Moscow may not need to significantly upgrade their relationship from its current trajectory. Xi and Putin share similar views of a hostile West and recognize the strategic advantages of closer alignment. But they remain wary of each other, with neither wanting to be responsible for or subordinate to the other.

Major changes or shocks, however, could drive them closer at a faster pace. Should Russia suffer a devastating military setback in Ukraine that risks the collapse of Putin’s regime, China might reconsider the question of substantial military aid. If China, in turn, finds itself in a major Taiwan crisis or conflict against the United States, Beijing could lean more on Moscow. During a conflict over Taiwan, Russia could also engage in opportunistic aggression elsewhere that would tie China and Russia together in the eyes of the international community, even if Moscow’s actions were not coordinated with Beijing.

A change in the trajectory toward ever closer Chinese-Russian ties may also be possible, though it is far less likely. Some Chinese experts worry that Russia will always prioritize its own interests over any consideration of bilateral ties. If, for instance, former U.S. President Donald Trump wins another term, he could decrease U.S. support for Ukraine and offer Putin improved relations. This, in turn, could dim the Kremlin’s willingness to support China against the United States. It’s not clear if this worry is shared by top Chinese or Russian leaders, but mutual distrust and skepticism of the other remain in both countries.

— This article appears in the Fall 2023 issue of Foreign Policy. | Bonny Lin, the Director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

#Analysis #China 🇨🇳 | Russia 🇷🇺 #Ukraine 🇺🇦 #Foreign Policy #Bonny Lin #Shanghai Cooperation Organisation #Beijing | Moscow #BRICS #Cold War #Xi Jinping | Vladimir Putin #Crimea #Chechnya 🇷🇺 | Georgia 🇬🇪 | Syria 🇸🇾 | Ukraine 🇺🇦 #Taiwan 🇹🇼 | Hong Kong 🇭🇰 | Tibet | Xinjiang 🇨🇳 #Xi & Putin | No Limits #North Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO) #United States 🇺🇸 | The European Union 🇪🇺 #G-7 #U.S. 🇺🇸 Hegemony #The U.N. 🇺🇳 Security Council #G-20 #BRICS | Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) #Western Unilateralism #Brazil 🇧🇷 | Russia 🇷🇺 | India 🇮🇳 | China 🇨🇳 | South Africa 🇿🇦 #Egypt 🇪🇬 | ran 🇮🇷 | Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 #“Decoupling” and “De-risking” #U.S. 🇺🇸-Led Coalitions #Belarus 🇧🇾 #China’s Belt and Road Initiative #Sino-Russian #Donald Trump

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

The West hoped Lula would be a partner. He’s got his own plans.

In his first months in office, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has declined to condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine, allowed Iranian warships to dock in Rio de Janeiro and dispatched a senior adviser to meet with Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro.

On Friday, Lula heads to Beijing, the finale of a three-day trip to China. More than 200 Brazilian business leaders headed to China ahead of Lula’s arrival to hash out a flurry of deals that will bring Brazil closer to its largest trading partner at a time when relations between Washington and Beijing have grown increasingly tense. Lula’s schedule includes a stop at a Shanghai facility of Huawei, the telecommunications giant that has been subject to U.S. sanctions.

In the Chinese capital, Lula will meet with Xi Jinping, the country’s top leader, who is pushing to upend the U.S.-led international order and position China as a diplomatic power broker. Brasília, meanwhile, is helping Beijing boost its currency, the yuan, over the dollar.

Lula’s election victory last year over Jair Bolsonaro, the dictatorship-admiring former military officer who aligned himself with President Donald Trump and the global right wing, buoyed optimism that Latin America’s most populous nation could be a partner in promoting democratic norms in the Western Hemisphere and beyond.

But instead, Lula is reminding the world of his approach to Brazil’s foreign policy — which, in keeping with his first stint in office, prioritizes pragmatism and dialogue, and shows little concern over whether it antagonizes Washington or the West.

Continue reading.

#brazil #politics #brazilian politics #foreign policy #mod nise da silveira #image description in alt

[influencermagazineuk]

The Tech Titan of China: Huawei's Domination and the Road Ahead

The Tech Titan of China: Huawei's Domination and the Road Ahead Huawei, a name synonymous with technological innovation, has established itself as a dominant force in the Chinese market. From smartphones and telecommunications equipment to cloud computing and artificial intelligence, Huawei's tentacles reach across various sectors, solidifying its position as a national tech champion. But what factors have fueled this remarkable rise, and what does the future hold for Huawei in the face of a complex geopolitical landscape? One key driver of Huawei's success lies in its relentless focus on research and development (R&D). The company dedicates a significant portion of its revenue – over 10% annually – to innovation, fostering a culture of cutting-edge technology development. This commitment has yielded impressive results. Huawei boasts a robust patent portfolio, constantly pushing the boundaries in areas like 5G technology and chip design. This focus on R&D is intertwined with another crucial factor: Huawei's domestic supply chain. The company has meticulously cultivated a network of local suppliers, reducing reliance on foreign components. This strategy not only fosters self-sufficiency but also injects significant capital into the domestic tech ecosystem, creating a symbiotic relationship between Huawei and Chinese tech giants. Furthermore, Huawei has capitalized on China's burgeoning mobile phone market. By understanding the specific needs and preferences of Chinese consumers, Huawei tailors its smartphones to local tastes. This includes features like advanced camera technology, powerful processors catering to mobile gaming, and competitive pricing strategies. This consumer-centric approach has resulted in Huawei consistently topping smartphone sales charts within China. The Tech Titan of China: Huawei's Domination and the Road Ahead However, Huawei's dominance extends beyond consumer electronics. The company is a leader in telecommunications infrastructure, supplying critical equipment to major Chinese network operators. This dominance in the domestic telecom market grants Huawei significant influence over the flow of information within China. The Chinese government has also played a role in Huawei's ascent. Government policies promoting domestic innovation and prioritizing Chinese tech companies have undeniably created a fertile ground for Huawei's growth. Additionally, state-backed investments in infrastructure projects have provided Huawei with valuable opportunities to showcase its technological prowess. However, Huawei's journey isn't without its challenges. The ongoing trade war between the US and China has cast a long shadow. Accusations of espionage and security threats have led to restrictions on Huawei's access to US-made technology, particularly semiconductors, a crucial component for smartphones and other electronic devices. This has forced Huawei to invest heavily in developing its own chipsets, a complex and time-consuming endeavor. Despite these challenges, Huawei remains a formidable force in the Chinese market. The company is constantly innovating, seeking alternative suppliers, and exploring new avenues of growth. Huawei's HiSilicon arm is spearheading efforts in chip development, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign technology. Additionally, the company is venturing into areas like cloud computing and artificial intelligence, positioning itself as a comprehensive tech solutions provider. Looking ahead, Huawei's future hinges on its ability to navigate the geopolitical landscape and overcome the hurdles imposed by US restrictions. The company's success in developing its own chip ecosystem will be critical. Additionally, Huawei's ability to forge new partnerships and diversify its markets beyond China will determine its long-term global standing. Huawei's dominance in the Chinese market is a confluence of factors. From its unwavering commitment to R&D to its deep understanding of domestic consumer preferences and the backing of the Chinese government, Huawei has carved a unique path to success. However, the company faces significant challenges in the form of US sanctions and the need for technological self-sufficiency. As Huawei navigates these complexities, one thing remains certain: the tech titan of China will continue to be a central player in shaping the global technological landscape in the years to come. Read the full article

[doineedavpnifihaveafirewall]

why is vpn legal

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

why is vpn legal

Legal framework of VPN usage

A Virtual Private Network (VPN) serves as a crucial tool for protecting online privacy and security. However, the legal framework surrounding VPN usage varies across different countries.

In most nations, utilizing VPNs for personal use is perfectly legal. VPNs encrypt internet traffic, safeguarding sensitive data from potential hackers or unauthorized surveillance. As a result, VPNs are commonly employed by individuals seeking to enhance their privacy while browsing the web.

Nevertheless, concerns arise in certain countries where VPN usage is restricted or prohibited. For instance, in nations like China, Russia, and Iran, strict regulations are imposed on VPN services to control online content and prevent citizens from accessing certain websites. In such cases, the use of unauthorized VPNs can lead to legal repercussions.

On the contrary, some countries have implemented laws that regulate VPN services to ensure legal compliance. They may require VPN providers to adhere to specific data retention policies or disclose user information under certain circumstances. It is essential for users to be aware of these regulations to avoid any potential legal issues.

In conclusion, while VPNs are generally legal tools for enhancing online privacy and security, users must be mindful of the legal framework governing VPN usage in their respective countries. By understanding and complying with these regulations, individuals can make informed decisions regarding their online activities while utilizing VPN services.

Jurisdictional regulations on VPNs

Jurisdictional regulations on Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) vary significantly across the globe, posing challenges for users seeking privacy and security online. A VPN allows users to encrypt their internet connection and route it through a remote server, effectively masking their IP address and location. While VPNs offer numerous benefits, including enhanced privacy and access to restricted content, the legal landscape surrounding their use is complex.

In some countries, such as China, Russia, and Iran, VPN usage is heavily restricted or outright banned. Governments in these regions often impose strict regulations to control internet access and prevent citizens from circumventing censorship measures. In contrast, other countries, like Switzerland and the British Virgin Islands, have more lenient regulations, fostering a favorable environment for VPN providers.

In the United States, VPN regulations are relatively lax, with no specific laws governing their use. However, recent debates over data privacy and national security have led to increased scrutiny of VPN providers. In 2020, the US Senate passed a bill requiring government agencies to assess the potential security risks associated with using VPNs owned or operated by foreign adversaries.

European Union (EU) member states adhere to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which governs the collection and processing of personal data. While the GDPR does not specifically address VPNs, it imposes strict requirements on companies handling user data, including those providing VPN services.

Navigating the jurisdictional regulations on VPNs requires users to stay informed about the legal landscape in their region and the policies of their chosen VPN provider. Additionally, users should prioritize providers with robust privacy policies and transparent data handling practices to ensure their online activities remain secure and compliant with applicable laws.

Privacy laws and VPN legality

Privacy laws and the legality of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are intricately linked in the modern digital landscape. As concerns about online privacy continue to rise, governments around the world are enacting laws to safeguard the personal data of their citizens. VPNs, which provide encrypted connections and mask users' IP addresses, are often utilized as tools to enhance online privacy and security.

In many countries, privacy laws dictate how companies collect, store, and use individuals' personal information. These laws aim to protect user data from unauthorized access and ensure transparency in data handling practices. For instance, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets strict guidelines for the processing of personal data and grants individuals greater control over their information.

However, the legality of VPN usage varies from one jurisdiction to another. While VPNs are legal in most countries, there are exceptions where their use is restricted or prohibited. Some nations, particularly those with authoritarian regimes, impose bans on VPNs to control access to information and suppress dissent. In contrast, other countries embrace VPNs as tools for online privacy and cybersecurity.

Moreover, the legality of VPNs may also be influenced by their intended use. While using a VPN for legitimate purposes such as protecting sensitive data on public Wi-Fi networks is generally accepted, engaging in illegal activities while using a VPN may violate the law.

Overall, navigating the intersection of privacy laws and VPN legality requires an understanding of both the regulatory environment and the intended use of VPN services. As individuals and businesses strive to protect their online privacy, staying informed about applicable laws and choosing reputable VPN providers are essential steps towards maintaining digital security and compliance with legal requirements.

International treaties and VPN legality

International treaties play a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape around Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). As the use of VPNs has become increasingly widespread globally, questions regarding their legality and regulation have also emerged.

It is important to note that the legality of VPNs varies from country to country, and international treaties can impact how VPN services are treated on a global scale. Many countries have laws in place that govern the use of VPNs, and these laws can be influenced by international agreements.

One key aspect to consider is how international treaties may impact data privacy and security regulations related to VPNs. Countries that are signatories to certain treaties may be required to adhere to specific standards when it comes to data protection, which can have implications for the use of VPNs within their borders.

Additionally, international agreements can also play a role in addressing issues such as online censorship and surveillance. VPNs are often used as a tool to bypass restrictions on internet access or to enhance online privacy, and treaties between countries can impact the ability of individuals to utilize VPN services for these purposes.

In conclusion, international treaties are an important factor to consider when examining the legality of VPNs on a global scale. While the use of VPNs is generally legal in many countries, the regulatory environment can be influenced by international agreements that aim to address data privacy, security, and online freedom issues. It is essential for users to be aware of the legal implications of using VPN services in different jurisdictions to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

Government stance on VPN usage

In recent years, the government stance on Virtual Private Network (VPN) usage has become a topic of significant discussion and debate. VPNs, originally developed to provide secure access to corporate networks, have gained popularity among individuals seeking privacy and security online.

Governments worldwide have varied perspectives on VPN usage. Some countries embrace VPNs as a tool for protecting online privacy and security, recognizing their importance in safeguarding sensitive information from cyber threats. These governments may even encourage the use of VPNs to ensure citizens can access a free and open internet without fear of surveillance or censorship.

However, in certain regions, the government stance on VPNs is more restrictive. Authorities in these areas may view VPNs as a threat to national security or as tools that enable illegal activities, such as accessing restricted content or circumventing censorship measures. Consequently, they may impose regulations or outright bans on VPN usage, requiring service providers to obtain licenses or even blocking VPN services altogether.

The reasons behind these differing stances often stem from concerns about maintaining control over internet access and content within a country's borders. Governments may argue that restricting VPN usage is necessary to combat cybercrime, prevent terrorist activities, or uphold societal values.

Despite these differing perspectives, the use of VPNs continues to proliferate globally. Many individuals and businesses rely on VPN technology to safeguard their online activities, protect sensitive data, and bypass geo-restrictions. As such, the government's stance on VPN usage remains a complex and evolving issue, balancing concerns about security, privacy, and internet freedom in an increasingly digital world.

[howlongdoesnortonvpntaketoconnec]

does feral hosting vpn work in china

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

does feral hosting vpn work in china

Feral Hosting VPN effectiveness in China

Feral Hosting VPN, known for its reliability and security features, offers an effective solution for users in China looking to bypass internet restrictions and censorship. In China, where internet access is tightly controlled, a VPN like Feral Hosting can be a valuable tool for accessing blocked websites and ensuring online privacy.

One of the key strengths of Feral Hosting VPN in China is its ability to evade detection by the Great Firewall, the country's advanced censorship system. By encrypting internet traffic and routing it through servers located outside China, Feral Hosting can help users bypass restrictions and access online content that would otherwise be unavailable.

Additionally, Feral Hosting VPN offers fast connection speeds, crucial for streaming content or engaging in online activities that require a stable internet connection. This is especially important in China, where internet speeds can vary and accessing foreign websites can sometimes be slow and unreliable.

Moreover, Feral Hosting VPN prioritizes user privacy and security, with features like a strict no-logs policy and strong encryption protocols. This ensures that users in China can browse the internet anonymously and securely, without fear of their online activities being tracked or monitored.

Overall, Feral Hosting VPN is a reliable and effective choice for individuals in China seeking to overcome internet censorship and safeguard their online privacy. With its robust security features and ability to bypass restrictions, Feral Hosting provides a valuable service for users navigating the challenges of the Chinese internet landscape.

Feral Hosting VPN China performance analysis

Feral Hosting VPN offers users a reliable and secure VPN service designed to provide users with online privacy and freedom. For users in China, where internet restrictions and censorship are enforced, having a VPN service like Feral Hosting can be essential in accessing blocked websites and securing online activities.

When analyzing the performance of Feral Hosting VPN in China, several key factors come into play. One of the main aspects to consider is the ability of the VPN to bypass the Great Firewall of China effectively. Feral Hosting VPN has been known to have high success rates in circumventing censorship measures, allowing users in China to access a wide range of websites and online services without restrictions.

In addition to bypassing censorship, the speed and reliability of the VPN connection are crucial for users in China. Feral Hosting VPN provides fast servers and stable connections, ensuring smooth browsing, streaming, and downloading experiences for users in China.

Furthermore, Feral Hosting VPN prioritizes user privacy and security by implementing robust encryption protocols and a no-logs policy. This gives users in China peace of mind knowing that their online activities are protected from prying eyes and potential surveillance.

Overall, Feral Hosting VPN's performance in China is commendable, making it a top choice for users looking to enhance their online experience while navigating the challenges posed by internet restrictions in the region.

Feral Hosting VPN reliability in China

Title: Navigating the Great Firewall: Assessing Feral Hosting VPN Reliability in China

As China tightens its grip on internet control with the infamous Great Firewall, accessing unrestricted online content becomes increasingly challenging for residents and travelers alike. Amidst this digital landscape, the reliability of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) emerges as a critical factor for bypassing censorship and ensuring secure internet access. Among the plethora of VPN providers, Feral Hosting stands out for its reputation and performance. But how does it fare specifically in the context of China?

Feral Hosting VPN has garnered praise for its robust encryption protocols, efficient server infrastructure, and commitment to privacy. These features position it as a promising option for users seeking to circumvent China's internet restrictions. However, the efficacy of any VPN in China depends on various factors, including the government's continuous efforts to block VPN traffic and the VPN provider's ability to adapt and innovate.

In practice, Feral Hosting VPN users in China report mixed experiences. Some users commend its reliability in bypassing censorship and accessing restricted content, citing consistent speeds and stable connections. Others, however, encounter occasional disruptions and decreased speeds during peak usage hours, indicative of the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between VPN providers and Chinese authorities.

Moreover, while Feral Hosting VPN employs advanced techniques to obfuscate VPN traffic, occasional detection and subsequent blocking by Chinese authorities are not unheard of. Consequently, users in China may need to employ additional strategies such as rotating servers, utilizing stealth modes, or combining VPNs with other circumvention tools for optimal reliability and accessibility.

In conclusion, while Feral Hosting VPN offers a promising solution for navigating China's internet restrictions, its reliability in the country remains subject to various factors, including governmental crackdowns and technological advancements. Users should exercise caution, employ best practices, and stay informed about evolving censorship tactics to maximize their online freedom and security.

Feral Hosting VPN functionality in China

Feral Hosting offers VPN functionality that can be a valuable tool for users in China looking to access restricted content and enhance their online privacy and security. In a country like China, where internet censorship and surveillance are prevalent, using a VPN service can help users bypass restrictions and browse the internet freely.

By utilizing Feral Hosting's VPN functionality, users in China can mask their IP addresses and encrypt their internet traffic, making it difficult for third parties to monitor their online activities. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals wanting to access blocked websites and services, such as social media platforms or streaming sites, that are otherwise inaccessible in China.

Moreover, Feral Hosting's VPN service can also help users protect their sensitive information from potential cyber threats, such as hacking or identity theft. The encrypted connection provided by the VPN ensures that data transmitted between the user's device and the internet is secure and private.

It is important to note that while VPNs can be effective tools for enhancing online privacy and bypassing censorship, users in China should be aware of the legal implications of using such services in the country. The Chinese government has strict regulations on internet usage, and using a VPN to access restricted content can potentially lead to legal repercussions.

In conclusion, Feral Hosting's VPN functionality can offer valuable benefits for users in China seeking to navigate online restrictions and safeguard their digital privacy. However, users should exercise caution and stay informed about the legalities surrounding VPN usage in China.

Feral Hosting VPN China accessibility review

Feral Hosting VPN China Accessibility Review

Feral Hosting, a renowned VPN provider, offers a comprehensive solution for users seeking privacy, security, and accessibility, even in regions with strict internet regulations like China. In this review, we delve into the accessibility of Feral Hosting VPN in China.

One of the primary concerns for VPN users in China is the Great Firewall, which heavily restricts access to foreign websites and services. Feral Hosting VPN effectively bypasses these restrictions by utilizing advanced encryption protocols and a vast network of servers located worldwide. In China, users can connect to Feral Hosting VPN servers located outside the country, enabling them to access blocked content with ease.

Moreover, Feral Hosting VPN employs obfuscation techniques to mask VPN traffic, making it difficult for Chinese authorities to detect and block VPN usage. This ensures a seamless browsing experience for users in China, allowing them to enjoy unrestricted access to the global internet.

In terms of speed and reliability, Feral Hosting VPN performs admirably in China. With strategically positioned servers and optimized network infrastructure, users can expect minimal latency and consistent speeds for streaming, gaming, and browsing activities.

Furthermore, Feral Hosting offers dedicated customer support to assist users in China with any technical issues or inquiries they may encounter. This level of support is invaluable, especially for users navigating the complexities of circumventing internet censorship.

In conclusion, Feral Hosting VPN proves to be a reliable and accessible solution for users in China seeking to bypass internet restrictions and safeguard their online privacy. With its robust security features, optimized performance, and responsive support, Feral Hosting VPN stands out as a top choice for users in restrictive environments like China.

[whatismcfsakcertinstalledforvpna]

does meraki vpn work in china

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

does meraki vpn work in china

Meraki VPN China regulations

In recent times, navigating the digital landscape in China has become increasingly complex, particularly in terms of Virtual Private Network (VPN) usage. One notable VPN provider affected by China's regulations is Meraki. Meraki, known for its user-friendly VPN solutions, has encountered hurdles in complying with the stringent regulations imposed by the Chinese government.

China, known for its strict internet censorship policies, tightly regulates VPN usage within its borders. The primary objective behind these regulations is to control access to online content and maintain state security. As a result, foreign VPN providers like Meraki must adhere to specific guidelines to operate within China legally.

One of the significant challenges Meraki faces is ensuring that its VPN services comply with China's censorship laws while still providing users with reliable and secure internet access. This involves implementing sophisticated encryption protocols and employing robust security measures to safeguard user data from potential surveillance.

Moreover, Meraki must navigate the intricate legal landscape to obtain the necessary licenses and approvals from Chinese authorities to offer its VPN services in the country. This process often entails extensive negotiations and collaboration with local partners to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Despite these challenges, Meraki remains committed to providing users in China with access to secure and reliable VPN services. By prioritizing compliance with local regulations and investing in cutting-edge technology, Meraki aims to overcome the hurdles posed by China's stringent internet regulations and continue serving its customers effectively.

In conclusion, Meraki's journey in navigating China's VPN regulations underscores the complexities foreign tech companies face when operating in highly regulated markets. Through strategic planning and diligent adherence to regulatory requirements, Meraki strives to maintain its presence in China's competitive digital landscape while upholding its commitment to user privacy and security.

Meraki VPN connectivity in China

Title: Navigating Meraki VPN Connectivity Challenges in China

In the realm of global connectivity, China presents unique challenges for VPN usage, particularly for enterprises leveraging Meraki VPN solutions. The Great Firewall of China, a comprehensive system of internet censorship, imposes strict regulations on virtual private networks (VPNs), complicating connectivity for businesses operating within the country.

Meraki VPN, known for its user-friendly interface and robust security features, encounters specific hurdles when deployed in China. The primary issue revolves around the sophisticated techniques employed by Chinese authorities to block VPN traffic, limiting access to external networks. This can disrupt essential business operations, hinder communication, and impede productivity for multinational corporations with a presence in China.

To navigate these challenges, organizations must employ strategic approaches to optimize Meraki VPN connectivity within China. One method involves utilizing obfuscation techniques, which cloak VPN traffic to mimic regular internet traffic, thereby evading detection by the Great Firewall. By obscuring VPN usage, businesses can maintain reliable connectivity while adhering to local regulations.

Additionally, deploying multiple VPN servers across various regions can enhance reliability and mitigate the risk of service disruptions. This diversified approach ensures continuous access to critical resources and minimizes the impact of potential network blocks or slowdowns.

Moreover, staying informed about evolving regulatory developments and leveraging technological advancements are crucial for adapting Meraki VPN deployments to the dynamic landscape of internet governance in China. By monitoring changes in policies and employing innovative solutions, enterprises can proactively address connectivity challenges and sustain seamless operations.

In conclusion, while navigating Meraki VPN connectivity in China poses obstacles due to regulatory constraints, strategic implementation of obfuscation techniques, server diversification, and proactive adaptation to regulatory changes are essential for maintaining reliable and secure connectivity for businesses operating within the country. By employing these strategies, organizations can optimize their Meraki VPN deployments and overcome the complexities of operating within China's digital environment.

Meraki VPN firewall bypass China

In recent years, navigating the digital landscape in China has presented challenges for businesses and individuals alike. The Great Firewall of China, a term used to describe the country's strict internet censorship and surveillance policies, often restricts access to popular websites and online services outside its borders. This poses significant obstacles for those who require secure and unrestricted internet access, such as businesses with international operations.

One solution that has gained traction in overcoming these obstacles is utilizing a Meraki VPN firewall bypass in China. Meraki, a leader in cloud-managed networking solutions, offers VPN (Virtual Private Network) capabilities that enable users to establish secure connections to their desired online destinations, bypassing the restrictions imposed by the Great Firewall.

By leveraging Meraki's VPN functionality, businesses operating in China can ensure their employees have reliable access to essential online resources and applications, regardless of their geographical location. This is particularly crucial for multinational corporations that rely on seamless communication and collaboration across borders.

Moreover, Meraki's cloud-managed approach simplifies the deployment and management of VPN connections, reducing the burden on IT administrators and ensuring consistent performance and security. This is especially valuable in environments where technical expertise may be limited or where rapid scalability is necessary to accommodate changing business needs.

However, it's essential to note that while Meraki VPN can effectively bypass the Great Firewall of China, users should still exercise caution and adhere to local regulations regarding internet usage. Additionally, employing other security measures such as encryption and multi-factor authentication can further enhance the security of VPN connections in potentially hostile digital environments.

In conclusion, leveraging Meraki VPN firewall bypass technology offers a viable solution for businesses seeking to navigate the complexities of internet censorship in China while maintaining security and productivity. With its user-friendly interface and robust features, Meraki empowers organizations to overcome barriers and stay connected in an increasingly interconnected world.

Meraki VPN performance in China

Meraki VPN performance in China poses unique challenges due to the country's strict internet regulations and the Great Firewall. The Great Firewall of China heavily regulates and monitors internet traffic, leading to potential disruptions in VPN services, including Meraki VPN. Users in China may experience slower connection speeds, intermittent connectivity issues, and difficulty accessing certain websites or online services when using a VPN.

Due to the complex nature of internet regulations in China, VPN services like Meraki may face limitations in providing consistent and reliable performance. The varying levels of internet censorship and restrictions imposed by the Chinese government can impact VPN functionality, leading to fluctuations in performance.

To enhance Meraki VPN performance in China, users can explore alternative server locations, utilize obfuscation techniques to bypass censorship measures, and optimize VPN settings for better connectivity. Additionally, staying updated on the latest developments in internet regulations in China and adapting VPN usage accordingly can help mitigate performance issues.

It is important for users in China to be cautious and aware of the legal implications of using VPN services to bypass censorship. While VPNs can offer privacy and secure connections, it is essential to comply with local laws and regulations to avoid potential penalties.

Overall, Meraki VPN performance in China can be influenced by various factors related to internet censorship and regulatory restrictions. By employing proactive measures and staying informed, users can navigate these challenges and optimize their VPN experience in the region.

Meraki VPN alternatives for China

Meraki VPN is a popular choice for many users worldwide, but when it comes to using VPNs in China, there are certain challenges due to the country's strict internet censorship policies known as the Great Firewall. In China, the use of VPNs is heavily restricted, and many VPN services, including Meraki VPN, may face intermittent connectivity issues or complete blockage.

Despite these challenges, there are several alternative VPN services that users in China can consider to bypass censorship and access blocked content. One such alternative is ExpressVPN, which is known for its reliable service and strong encryption protocols that can help users navigate the Great Firewall.

Another option is NordVPN, which offers a variety of server locations and robust security features to ensure users' online privacy and anonymity while browsing the web in China. Similarly, Surfshark VPN is another alternative that provides users with a secure and private internet connection, making it harder for Chinese authorities to track online activities.

For those looking for a free VPN option, ProtonVPN offers a basic free plan that can help users bypass censorship and access restricted websites in China. However, it is essential to note that free VPN services may have limitations compared to paid options in terms of speed, server locations, and security features.

In conclusion, while Meraki VPN may face challenges in China, there are several alternative VPN services available for users to consider. It is crucial to choose a reputable VPN provider with strong encryption protocols and a commitment to user privacy to ensure a secure and reliable internet connection while navigating the Great Firewall in China.

[howgoodisatlasvpn]

does slack work in china vpn

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

does slack work in china vpn

Slack service availability in China

Slack, a popular cloud-based team collaboration tool, faces challenges with service availability in China due to the country's strict internet regulations. The Great Firewall of China heavily regulates online content, making it difficult for foreign tech companies like Slack to operate within the country.

As a result, Slack users in China may experience periodic disruptions in service or complete blocks on accessing the platform. The Chinese government controls internet traffic through censorship and blocking certain websites, including many Western social media platforms and communication tools.

To circumvent these restrictions, some users in China resort to virtual private networks (VPNs) to access Slack and other blocked services. However, VPN usage is also closely monitored and restricted in China, with the government regularly cracking down on VPN providers.

Slack has made efforts to comply with local regulations in China by partnering with a local cloud service provider to host its data within the country. Despite these efforts, service interruptions can still occur due to the unpredictable nature of internet censorship in China.

As China continues to tighten its grip on online communication and information flow, foreign tech companies like Slack will face ongoing challenges in ensuring reliable service availability to users within the country. Navigating the complex regulatory environment in China remains a key issue for Slack and other similar platforms looking to maintain a presence in the Chinese market.

Using VPN for accessing Slack in China

In China, accessing certain websites and platforms can be restricted due to the country's internet censorship policies. Slack, a popular messaging platform for businesses and teams, is one such platform that may be difficult to access from within China. However, one effective way to bypass these restrictions and securely access Slack in China is by using a Virtual Private Network (VPN).

A VPN works by creating a secure and encrypted connection to a remote server, allowing users to browse the internet and access restricted websites while masking their actual IP address. By connecting to a server outside of China, users can effectively bypass the country's internet restrictions and access blocked websites such as Slack.

When using a VPN to access Slack in China, it's important to choose a reliable and reputable VPN service provider to ensure security and privacy. Look for a VPN that offers strong encryption protocols, a no-logs policy, and servers in locations outside of China. Additionally, consider the VPN provider's speed and reliability to ensure a smooth experience while using Slack.

By using a VPN to access Slack in China, users can communicate with their team members and collaborate on projects efficiently without being hindered by internet restrictions. It's essential to prioritize security and privacy when using a VPN, especially when accessing sensitive business communications and data. With the right VPN service, staying connected on Slack while in China can be seamless and hassle-free.

Restriction of Slack in China

In recent years, China has tightened its grip on internet regulations, with a particular focus on restricting access to foreign messaging platforms. Among these platforms, Slack, a popular communication tool used by businesses worldwide, has faced significant restrictions within China's borders.

The Chinese government's rationale for restricting Slack primarily revolves around concerns regarding information control and cybersecurity. As a platform that facilitates real-time communication and file sharing, Slack poses potential challenges to the government's ability to monitor and regulate online conversations. This aligns with China's broader strategy of maintaining strict control over online content to uphold political stability and social harmony.

The restrictions imposed on Slack in China have significant implications for businesses operating within the country. Many multinational corporations rely on Slack as a central hub for internal communication and collaboration. The inability to access Slack disrupts workflows, hampers productivity, and complicates cross-border communication efforts.

In response to the restrictions, companies with operations in China have been forced to seek alternative communication platforms or implement complex workarounds to ensure continuity in their business operations. Some have turned to domestic messaging apps that comply with Chinese regulations, albeit with potential compromises in privacy and data security.

Despite these challenges, businesses continue to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape in China, adapting their communication strategies to comply with local regulations while maintaining operational efficiency. The restriction of Slack serves as a reminder of the complexities and risks associated with operating in a heavily regulated digital environment like China, where compliance with government directives is paramount for long-term success.

VPN use in China for accessing foreign services

Virtual Private Networks (VPN) have become a crucial tool for individuals in China looking to access foreign online services that are otherwise restricted by the country's strict internet censorship laws. The Great Firewall of China is known for blocking access to popular websites and platforms such as Google, Facebook, and YouTube. In order to bypass these restrictions and enjoy unrestricted internet access, many people living in or traveling to China turn to VPN services.

By using a VPN, individuals in China can mask their IP address and encrypt their internet connection, allowing them to access websites and online services that are otherwise blocked. This technology creates a secure tunnel between the user's device and a remote server located outside of China, giving them the ability to browse the internet with privacy and anonymity.

One of the key benefits of using a VPN in China is the ability to access foreign content such as streaming services, news websites, and social media platforms that are blocked within the country. This enables users to stay connected with friends and family abroad, access important information, and enjoy their favorite online entertainment.

However, it's important to note that while VPNs can be effective in bypassing censorship in China, the government has been known to block VPN services as well. As a result, it's essential to choose a reliable and secure VPN provider that offers advanced encryption protocols and regularly updates their server locations to ensure uninterrupted access to foreign services.

In conclusion, VPNs play a critical role in enabling individuals in China to access foreign online services and bypass internet censorship. By utilizing a VPN service, users can enjoy a free and open internet experience while protecting their online privacy and security.

Bypassing internet censorship in China to use Slack

Title: Navigating China's Internet Censorship to Access Slack

China's stringent internet censorship policies pose significant challenges for individuals and businesses seeking access to essential communication tools like Slack. With the government's tight control over online content, accessing foreign platforms can be a daunting task. However, there are several strategies that users can employ to bypass these restrictions and utilize Slack effectively.

One approach is to use a virtual private network (VPN), which encrypts internet traffic and routes it through servers located outside of China. By masking the user's IP address, VPNs can effectively bypass the Great Firewall and grant access to blocked websites and services, including Slack. However, it's essential to choose a reliable VPN provider that offers strong encryption and regularly updates its servers to evade detection by Chinese authorities.

Another method is to utilize proxy servers or Tor, a decentralized network that anonymizes internet traffic by routing it through a series of volunteer-operated servers. While these options can provide access to Slack and other blocked platforms, they may be slower and less reliable than VPNs.

Additionally, some individuals may opt to use alternative communication tools that are less likely to be blocked by Chinese authorities. Platforms like WeChat and DingTalk, which are developed and hosted within China, are popular alternatives to Slack for domestic users. However, these platforms may lack the features and functionality that make Slack appealing to international users and businesses.

In conclusion, while China's internet censorship presents significant obstacles to accessing Slack, there are several strategies available to users. Whether utilizing VPNs, proxy servers, or alternative communication tools, individuals and businesses can navigate the Great Firewall and maintain effective communication channels in spite of government restrictions.

[mariacallous]

Planning is underway for the G-7 summit that Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni will host from June 13 to 15. As the 50th summit of the G-7, the club of the world’s leading democracies, there will be an impulse to celebrate.

Understandably so. The G-7—which includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and, since 1981, the EU—today represents 54 percent of world GDP and over 55 percent of global defense spending. For decades, G-7 members have gained additional weight on the world stage by coordinating their national economic power in pursuit of shared foreign-policy priorities, such as protecting democratic societies and open markets.

But the importance of the coming summit exceeds its status as a landmark anniversary. The G-7’s future—and the future of global democratic cohesion in general—is now at stake.

Recent disparaging remarks about NATO by presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump have led many to question the credibility of America’s commitment to its allies. Part of Trump’s frustration with NATO comes from other NATO members’ historically low defense spending compared to the United States. Why should Americans spend more on Europe’s defense than Europeans are willing to?

However, the G-7 might prove even more vulnerable to the vagaries of a second Trump term. For Trump, coordinating U.S. foreign policy with others is a pointless constraint on U.S. freedom of action—unless, that is, it provides a tangible net economic return to America.

Herein lies the problem. The United States currently runs a trade deficit in goods with all of its G-7 partners except the United Kingdom. In 2023, these deficits amounted to $337 billion, more than the U.S. deficit with China ($279 billion). Trade deficits in goods are a foreign-policy red flag to Trump. That is why he treated Angela Merkel’s Germany as a greater rival than Vladimir Putin’s Russia and torpedoed the 2018 summit communiqué after G-7 leaders tried to push back against U.S. protectionism.

G-7 leaders could cross their fingers and hope there is a second term for incumbent U.S. President Joe Biden. But this is currently, at best, a 50-50 proposition. Instead, they should use the next three months to put in place a policy agenda that could withstand the buffeting of a second Trump presidency while also serving as a platform for a second Biden term.

The G-7’s achievements in Biden’s first term have been impressive. Since Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the G-7 has implemented an unprecedented package of sanctions against Russia, ranging from freezing the roughly $300 billion of its central bank’s reserves held in their currencies to banning the provision of insurance to tankers carrying Russian oil if it’s sold above a cap of $60 per barrel. It can do this because over 93 percent of global reserves are held in G-7 currencies, and over 90 percent of the world’s oceangoing tonnage is covered by protection and indemnity insurance issued by companies based in the G-7.

Reflecting their common concerns over China’s rise and Beijing’s close alignment with Moscow, the G-7 has also engaged consistently over the past three years with close allies South Korea and Australia, in an effort to start “friendshoring” supply chains for the semiconductors and renewable energy inputs that will be central to their future economic growth.

All this important work could come to an end if a new Trump administration returned to punishing its closest allies for being free riders. But fixing G-7 members’ trade imbalances with the United States is impossible in the near term. That’s why the upcoming G-7 summit must prioritize preparing for the possible restoration of a hostile Trump presidency.

First, G-7 members need to send a clear signal to Moscow that their support for protecting the sovereignty of Ukraine has no time limit. The murderous conflict there is now shadowed by an intense contest to show which side can outlast the other politically and economically. With new U.S. support currently blocked in Congress, European countries plus the EU have already taken an important step to demonstrate their resolve, by committing a further 77 euros billion in future multiyear financial and military assistance to Kyiv, on top of the approximately 75 billion euros they have already allocated since the start of the war.

The summit should also decide how all G-7 members will start drawing on the profits earned from the frozen Russian reserves. The obstacle to date is that the bulk of these reserves are held by EU banks, and some governments and the European Central Bank are concerned that even the modest step of disbursing the earned interest (4.4 billion euros last year) lacks a firm legal foundation and could also undermine the euro’s credibility as a global reserve currency. Overcoming these reservations would underscore the G-7’s resolve; and a Trump presidency might think twice before reneging on an arrangement that would repay some of the U.S. costs of supporting Ukraine.

Second, G-7 members should invite South Korea and Australia formally into the group. If there is a second Biden term, their membership will strengthen the G-7’s collective resilience in high technology and renewable energy. If there is a second Trump presidency, these two democratic allies will be less isolated in the face of his mercantilist threats.

Third, G-7 members should allocate a first tranche of funding for the plan that the Biden administration, EU leaders, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and India announced last year to build a rail, energy, and data corridor from India through the Gulf and Israel to Europe. This belated but important project to compete with China’s Belt and Road Initiative will connect India’s and the Gulf states’ youthful, burgeoning economies with Europe’s wealthy but aging markets.

The war in Gaza has called the plan into question, but its benefits to Israel create an important additional incentive for a post-Netanyahu government to build a durable peace with the Palestinians. At the same time, it would support the Trump presidency’s main foreign-policy achievement: the 2020 Abraham Accords that normalized Israel’s relations with several Arab states.

The G-7 is an invaluable geo-economic coordinating body for what is shaping up to be a protracted new Cold War with China and Russia. Whether to cement the gains of the Biden presidency or lessen the global risks of a Trump presidency, the G-7’s 50th anniversary summit must live up to its billing.

[howtoincreasespeedofvpnconnectio]

does microsoft teams work in china with vpn

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

does microsoft teams work in china with vpn

Microsoft Teams China VPN compatibility

Microsoft Teams offers a convenient and efficient platform for organizations to collaborate and communicate effectively. However, users in China may encounter difficulties accessing Microsoft Teams due to the country's stringent internet regulations and censorship policies. To address this issue, many users resort to using Virtual Private Network (VPN) services to bypass these restrictions and access Microsoft Teams seamlessly.

When it comes to VPN compatibility in China, Microsoft Teams has certain limitations and considerations to keep in mind. Not all VPN services are effective in bypassing China's Great Firewall, so users need to choose a reliable and robust VPN service that can successfully circumvent the censorship barriers.

It is essential for organizations operating in China to ensure that the VPN service they choose is compatible with Microsoft Teams to guarantee uninterrupted communication and collaboration among team members. Compatibility issues between VPN services and Microsoft Teams can lead to connectivity problems, sluggish performance, or even complete inability to access the platform.

By selecting a VPN service that is known for its compatibility with Microsoft Teams and ability to bypass China's internet restrictions, users can enjoy a seamless and secure communication experience. It is advisable to research and select a VPN service that prioritizes user privacy, offers strong encryption protocols, and has servers located outside of China to ensure reliable access to Microsoft Teams.

In conclusion, ensuring VPN compatibility with Microsoft Teams is crucial for users in China to overcome internet restrictions and maintain efficient communication within their organizations. By choosing a reliable and compatible VPN service, users can optimize their Microsoft Teams experience and enhance productivity despite the challenges posed by China's internet censorship policies.

Operating Microsoft Teams in China

Operating Microsoft Teams in China presents unique challenges and considerations due to the country's regulatory environment and technological landscape. Microsoft Teams is a popular collaboration platform used by organizations worldwide for communication, file sharing, and project management. However, in China, its usage may be subject to certain restrictions and requirements imposed by the Chinese government.

One of the primary concerns when using Microsoft Teams in China is compliance with local regulations, particularly regarding data privacy and security. The Chinese government has stringent regulations governing the storage and transfer of data, especially sensitive information related to businesses and individuals. As such, organizations operating Teams in China must ensure that they adhere to these regulations to avoid potential legal repercussions.

Another important consideration is the accessibility of Microsoft Teams in China. The Great Firewall of China, a sophisticated system of internet censorship, can sometimes disrupt access to foreign websites and services, including Microsoft Teams. To mitigate this issue, organizations may need to explore alternative methods for accessing Teams, such as using virtual private networks (VPNs) or partnering with local service providers that offer optimized connectivity solutions.

Furthermore, organizations should be mindful of cultural differences and communication norms when using Microsoft Teams in China. Effective cross-cultural communication is essential for fostering collaboration and maintaining productive working relationships across international teams. This may involve adapting communication styles, scheduling meetings at appropriate times to accommodate different time zones, and being sensitive to cultural nuances in written and verbal communication.

In summary, operating Microsoft Teams in China requires careful attention to regulatory compliance, accessibility challenges, and cultural considerations. By addressing these factors proactively, organizations can effectively leverage Teams as a powerful tool for collaboration while navigating the complexities of the Chinese market.

VPN usage with Microsoft Teams in China

Using a VPN with Microsoft Teams in China can be essential for maintaining secure and reliable communication. Due to China's strict internet censorship policies, many users may encounter restrictions when trying to access Microsoft Teams. By utilizing a VPN (Virtual Private Network), users can bypass these restrictions and ensure smooth communication within the platform.

A VPN encrypts internet traffic and routes it through a remote server, effectively masking the user's IP address and location. This allows users in China to access Microsoft Teams as if they were connecting from a different location where the platform is not blocked. As a result, users can enjoy unrestricted access to Microsoft Teams and communicate seamlessly with colleagues, clients, and team members worldwide.

Moreover, using a VPN adds an extra layer of security to communication on Microsoft Teams. The encryption provided by the VPN helps protect sensitive information shared during meetings, calls, and file transfers from potential eavesdroppers or cyber threats. This is particularly important for businesses operating in China, where data privacy and security are of utmost importance.

Overall, employing a VPN while using Microsoft Teams in China can enhance the user experience by ensuring uninterrupted access and bolstering security measures. Whether for professional or personal use, incorporating a VPN into your online activities can help you navigate through internet restrictions and communicate effectively with others on the platform.

Microsoft Teams accessibility in China with VPN

Microsoft Teams is a popular platform used by businesses worldwide for remote communication and collaboration. In China, where internet restrictions are in place, accessing Microsoft Teams can be challenging without the use of a VPN (Virtual Private Network). VPNs allow users to bypass government censorship and access blocked websites and applications, including Microsoft Teams.

By using a VPN in China, users can securely connect to international servers and access Microsoft Teams without any restrictions. This is especially important for businesses operating in China that rely on Microsoft Teams for video conferencing, file sharing, and project collaboration.

However, it is essential to choose a reliable VPN service provider when accessing Microsoft Teams in China. Some VPNs may not work effectively in bypassing internet restrictions, leading to connectivity issues and poor performance on the platform. It is recommended to select a VPN with strong encryption protocols and a wide range of server locations to ensure a seamless Microsoft Teams experience.

Moreover, users should be aware of the legal implications of using a VPN in China, as some VPN services are banned by the government. It is crucial to comply with local regulations and use VPNs responsibly for accessing Microsoft Teams and other essential business tools.

In conclusion, Microsoft Teams' accessibility in China with a VPN provides a practical solution for businesses to overcome internet restrictions and collaborate effectively with remote teams worldwide. By choosing the right VPN service and following local guidelines, users can enjoy a seamless and secure Microsoft Teams experience in China.

China VPN and Microsoft Teams functionality

China VPN and Microsoft Teams Functionality

For many businesses and individuals operating in China, accessing Microsoft Teams can be a challenge due to the country's strict internet censorship policies. In order to circumvent these restrictions and ensure seamless connectivity, many users turn to Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).

A VPN creates a secure and encrypted connection to the internet, allowing users to bypass censorship measures and access geo-restricted content, such as Microsoft Teams. By connecting to a VPN server outside of China, users can mask their IP address and appear as though they are accessing the internet from a different location, thus bypassing the Great Firewall of China.

With a reliable VPN service, users in China can enjoy uninterrupted access to Microsoft Teams, enabling them to collaborate with colleagues, attend virtual meetings, and share files securely. By encrypting data traffic, VPNs also help protect sensitive information from prying eyes, ensuring confidential communications remain private.

However, it is important to note that while VPNs can help bypass internet restrictions in China, the use of VPNs is subject to regulation, and not all VPN services may be reliable or secure. It is essential to choose a reputable VPN provider with strong encryption protocols and a track record of bypassing censorship effectively.

In conclusion, utilizing a VPN is a viable solution for accessing Microsoft Teams in China, allowing users to stay connected and productive in spite of the country's stringent internet controls. By leveraging the functionality of VPNs, businesses and individuals can overcome barriers to communication and collaboration, ensuring seamless access to essential tools like Microsoft Teams.