Tumgik
#is this some sort of discrimination???
thorne1435 · 14 days
Text
Don't nuance me, if your answer is ultimately yes or no, then it's still yes or no. Just explain yourself in the tags.
13 notes · View notes
the-warp-core · 1 year
Text
Something about the "I've always been different/alienated because of something I can't control" plotline being given to a straight, cis, white guy just. . . really annoys me
89 notes · View notes
elviraaxen · 6 months
Note
i love dunder's little tongue sticking out he's so adorable
he’s just a littol gubbe :p
16 notes · View notes
tracing-rivers · 5 months
Note
What is your Hogwarts house?
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
thatscarletflycatcher · 11 months
Text
Me to myself, soothingly: Youtube wants you to rage engage and that's why it put it in your recommended... Youtube wants you to rage engage and that's why it put it in your recommended... Youtube wants you to rage engage and that's why it put it in your recommended...
16 notes · View notes
thegroovywitch · 1 year
Text
thank u thank u thank u artists who portray every body type so we can see them all for what they really are: beautiful, and human.
10 notes · View notes
1pcii · 5 months
Text
reading one piece after being a naruto fan for so long is like finally experiencing love again after being in an abusive relationship
6 notes · View notes
quillinhand · 8 months
Note
i technically have a sort of magical system too but more like cosmic energy that happens to look like its magic and then maybe non-magic people also discriminate and the ones that are like there's a sub-human category and they have powers maybe they dont like humans that much and vise-verse yes yes
thats so interestinggg... you mentioned discrimination, so do the non magical people try to investigate how these people have magic? Like so they know about the whole cosmic energy thing. And are there elements of a magical community or is it just everybody on their own, fending for themselves?
6 notes · View notes
abimee · 1 year
Text
amaurot is so cool [turns around and latches the door before anybody can get in from hearing that] too bad people tend to misunderstand whats going on with it and which aspects of it are good and which are not
7 notes · View notes
gender0bender · 1 year
Text
I honestly feel like a lot of autistic people with privelege really don’t know the first thing about the r slur and what it feels like to be viewed as one by society and your peers and your family.
13 notes · View notes
johnmeowston · 1 year
Text
i think every trans poc person should be allowed to get treats whenever they want and be able to kill 1 person free of consequences a year
3 notes · View notes
ashetheshade · 10 months
Text
The new manager thinks I should just pick through the pain. Bitch I’m always pushing through *something* and pain makes it fucking *impossible* to function properly. And I think he threatened to fire me?
He’s, “worried about my longevity at *insert business*”,
And at first I though he was worried about my health because I’m dense as fuck but I think he means that he doesn’t want to keep someone that gets sick that often around.
He claims to understand pain because he pushes through headaches caused by lack of sleep but,
My headaches are caused by way more random stuff and can get pretty severe (to the point where sometimes I can only lay in bed and try to sleep)
Plus everyday I show up is a trial in and of itself regardless of physical health issues.
I tried to argue all this, but I did no call no show once, but I know my rights. You can’t fire people for being sick. And I am.
1 note · View note
So when am I going to be granted my God-given right to make polls? :(
4 notes · View notes
pikslasrce · 2 years
Text
whenever my brother reads me a reddit post abt literally anything i suddenly get the reading comprehension and critical thinking skills of a twitter user
5 notes · View notes
caroloftheshells · 2 years
Text
long post re theory pedagogy again
the other thing about that vid (and another thing! lol) being that hierarchically a lot of the people doing the more interesting or out-there research and diversifying the field from a content perspective (and, tbh, demographically) are like grad students or early-career people who don’t even necessarily have any pedagogical flexibility & tend to be slotted in to teach lower-level theory courses-- whose outcomes are predetermined not only by general screwy nasm strictures but by whatever the professor down the line in the curriculum is teaching / expects people to know when they get there. and we get paid (much) less also than tenured professors. which is really a generic “thing about all academia” that doesn’t necessarily become a nefarious personal flaw on the part of said scholars and instead ought to be addressed at a structural level bc the scale of the issue exceeds individual instructors’ spheres of influence.
BUT music occupies such a fucked “totally separate from society” space in many ppl’s imaginations that it’s like oh man how dare it have the same issues as every other field of scholarship bc it shouldn’t “really” be a matter of scholarship in the first place. ie music is culturally rendered a “nothing matters just feel it” / “everything is ephemeral and there is only Innate Talent and nothing can be taught” sort of field such that any intellectualizing thereof &/or suggestion of learnabilty / non-innateness is deemed, like, boring & regressive by some people & i’d say especially people raised with a certain awareness of the “composer-genius” culture of wam education. like i’m completely on the “fuck partwriting parallel fifths are awesome” train as a matter of taste (for example) but that does not mean that learning what parallel fifths are-- and why some old european guys didn’t like them *bc they preferred it to sound like there was more than one voice and it’s easier to create that perceptually w/o an overtone effect* (eg)-- is going to like destroy your artistic Essence and make you a worse musician bc now you’re no longer an empty vessel put on this earth to channel brahms or whoever. & plus i think perpetuating the synonymizing of theory-as-field with wam harmonic rules not only is like factually misrepresentative of current research but also is sort of a self fulfilling prophesy such that ppl who would otherwise have completely fascinating things to say & questions to ask are discouraged from non-platitudinous & open-ended (theoretical) inquiry re the content and aims of their own rep & listening, and tacitly learn that composers’ ~~genius~~ descended from the heavens & you either get it or you don’t, you either “have talent” as a composer or you don’t, et cetera
#Which I Maintain is dangerous not bc i think there is a set method of learning all music(s) obviously but bc that's how you get like#weird essentialism & i'm thinking especially abt anecdotes i've heard re: vocal pedagogy where ppl have been subjected to (...)#racial discrimination; gender discrimination; fatphobia / discrimination based on having or not having a certain 'look' to go w your voice#& told they are 'naturally' inclined to sing or study certain genres of music & shouldn't try anything else (not even ranges! whole genres)#which is maybe sort of tangential but i think stems from this same deal of 'you just have to Feel it' & such#the idea of music as ephemeral and quasi-spiritually channeled such that you lose something if you approach it w scrutiny#or if you have to break it down in a way that; in its detail & precision; reads as divorced from immediate aesthetic judgment#the idea that there's some magic there not to be explained; that composition thus is a special ineffable pursuit for special people. bleh#& the... in depth research and nuance and hesitancy to have a snappy take that like ime culturally describes many theorists. is good#& is; again ime; something valued by several music scholars who sought it out as a Way Out Of a certain brand of meritocratic bullshit#toward a different brand of weird pedantry of course but i think it has its place despite being hooked academically 2 a toxic music culture#in the sense that; for sure; there are egregious issues; but the repertoire bias is unilaterally present in wam circles#& it's like well. your problem is 'with' the textbooks but since when has a so called 'voice degree'#at your average som / public institution without enormous fucking tons of money#unlike idk berklee lol#actually regarded choral singing; musical theatre; art song; rock vocals; et cetera with the same seriousness as a wagnerian opera career#and made a variety of music available from a performance perspective as well. i mean my undergrad was vaguely ok here but On The Whole...#bigger fish re funding in notated-music industry and degrees as job prep for shrinking market etc#anyway though...... i value myself too much to be a youtuber lol#imagine me appending that 'just saying things recreationally' post to this post#carol overreacts to life#theorycomp tag
5 notes · View notes
thestarseersystem · 2 years
Text
Im just gonna say it, but I really recommend filtering out tags of things you do not like, if it's truly triggering.
But if you merely dislike a piece of media because you find it problematic, etc. then honestly that's kind of dumb. Just filter it out too??? Usually op is going to tag it?? So just filter. Use filters.
But seriously I just hate interacting with people who be like "you can't do this because it's problematic", I'll do whatever I want actually.
4 notes · View notes