[chemistry] it's not a word that actors [use]. but you must endeavor a little bit to try and fall in love, in whatever that capacity is. and andrew is a very easy person to fall in love with. he's kind, generous, talented. we shot the film at the perfect junction in our friendship where there was a lot we didn't know about each other, but there was mutual admiration and respect. and a similar sense of humor. (...) yeah, it felt fizzy when we were acting. especially with that first scene at the door -- it's so well-written. you feel like you're dancing through the scene, you can go in loads of different ways, and if i went one way, andrew would go another. if that's what chemistry is, i was aware it was happening.
-- paul on chemistry and whether ‘they (andrew & paul) knew instantly that their onscreen relationship was working’ in all of us strangers, screendaily.com (1/31/24)
92 notes
·
View notes
I'm once again thinking about the missed opportunities to have Klaus and Kol bond more. Part of Klaus' whole motivation as a vampire is to get his werewolf part back and to finally be stronger than Mikael (sort of, I'm simplifying) both of which can be obtained by breaking his curse. But Kol? Kol is the only other original that can relate to having a fundamental part of themself ripped away from them. Klaus might not have known he was a werewolf until he killed, but he likely still had a connection he couldn't explain, as evident by him going to watch the wolves transform. And something he'd never been able to explain was now gone. He might only be able to realise the connection afterwards through its absence.
Kol though. Kol had grown up with magic, a connection to nature and the world around him in a way the rest of his siblings supposedly didn't have. And then he gets turned. And not only has his baby brother died, his father has just murdered him and the rest of his siblings after forcing them to drink human blood, which he'll later learn. Now, not only does he have to deal with the grief of Henrik's death and also his own but also the loss of his magic. A loss that's likely only worsened by Kol being a self-proclaimed child prodigy.
Kol is pretty much the only one who could understand what Klaus is going through with the binding of his wolf. We know Kol searched for ways to get his magic back/carry on practicing magic in the same way that Klaus was looking for ways to break his curse. While Klaus likely could still feel his wolf there despite being bound, Kol has no access to his magic anymore. I just think they should've been able to bond or connect over their shared loss of an intrinsic aspect of their selves at the hands of their parents
58 notes
·
View notes
Wait do you think Annabeth Chase is abusive? Not trying to start an argument! Just genuinely curious because I never picked up on that before & I want to see if maybe this is a 'blindspot' I need to work on. Or did you mean a different character from the YA girlfriend poll?
No, I was talking about Annabeth. It's obviously not something RR intended, it's just a result of how fucking terrible he is at writing flirty banter (he just crosses the line into verbal abuse) and that he clearly thinks it's SO FUNNY when girls are violent against boys.
@hermesmyplatonicbeloved summarised it very well recently here but I've also gone more in detail about it with examples before here
Now, I'm not gonna pretend like all of my ships are perfect. I'm very familiar with the concept of recognising flaws in a ship and just deciding to like it anyway. I'm not gonna judge anyone for doing that with p/ercabeth. What baffles me is the widespread unawareness of those flaws. And what horrifies me is how often I see Annabeth's abusive tendencies actually encouraged by her stans and seen as something Percy deserves. Or just generally turned into a joke.
88 notes
·
View notes
0610 is so funny because mahiru is determined to be a housewife/maternal figure and kotoko is determined to parallel all the other prisoners' shitty fathers. both of them having the traits of "parental figures" that is a mold/box to be shoved into in and of itself which shows the traditional/black and white aspects of their own families. mahiru is determined to be full of love and give others that same love and kotoko pretends she doesn't love at all and bares her teeth whenever you show her love. mahiru has sun symbolism and kotoko has moon symbolism.
and then instead of ever acknowledging the absolutely insane character foil toxic yuri between those two at all, milgram refuses to let them interact ever again except for one interaction from four years ago at the very beginning and kotoko beating the shit out of mahiru. like. thanks milgram. if YOU wont do anything with your very interesting character foils that can also fall into classic "romance tropes" (which mahiru is obsessed with, cough) with their personalities/stories i guess ill do it myself.
43 notes
·
View notes
I know a lot of my followers won't be interested in royal stuff, but my genuine takeaway from this entire 'Kategate' is that this is the media flexing their muscles to try and goad Kensington Palace into revealing Kate's medical situation...
The media has had undue influence over the UK Royal Family for years, and their relationship and positive coverage has always originated from a give and take kind of arrangement. The press influence public mood (not the other way around as they would have you believe) and so the monarchy has always played ball in order to be seen favourably and ultimately keep any rise in republican sentiment at bay.
For whatever reason, KP obviously want to keep Kate's illness private and so have been unusually guarded in details. The statement was always that she'd make a return after Easter, and we're not there yet. The press are impatient though and they are the ones who've driven the "Where is she?" Narrative. They sense there's a story and for once in their lives they're not getting it.
They can't get the story they want, so they're creating a story of their own to fill the column inches. The photoshop story seems bizarre on first glance, it makes the Palace look unreliable and untrustworthy, until the stories emerge that other much older photos have also had editing done on them. It's supposed to sew the seed that they've always been untrustworthy, but the bigger question is why did outlets issue kill notices for this picture but not the older ones? Is it perhaps that it didn't suit their interests to do it before?
Then there's the affair rumours. They're being allowed to swirl again, but it's interesting that no UK publication is willing to outright say what they're hinting at. They may be a superinjunction in place, but then again even overseas publications who can say more aren't really saying anything convincing? Do they have a story that they're threatening to print? Or are they firing warning shots to try and force KP to fall in line and give them the Kate story?
And it might sound insane, that the press is essentially holding the royal family to ransom, but they've done it before, countless times, where they've barraged the royals with negative press in order to force their hand into doing something. Look what they did to Diana, and what they did in the week after Diana died, even how they've gone easy on Andrew because his side of the family is clearly giving them stories to placate them.
Yeah, it's weird. Yeah, she's probably been more ill than they're letting on, but I'm not sure that KP are fumbling so much as trying to give concessions to try and keep both sides happy, but it's too late because the press are out for blood... and they're not going to stop until they get the story.
20 notes
·
View notes
is thierry human? was he ever human at any point in time? or is he just a guy in the puter
as close as thierry is to being something next to a virtual replica of humanity, he's... likely not, & likely has never been legitimately human.
i say " likely not " & not " definitely not " because... he's really VERY close; having lived a mundane life - so he claims, being very in-touch with things people would know - important & not, very wired like how your average person would be with only few indicators he wouldn't Be " your average person ", but there's a couple differences JUST distinct & abstract enough that separates him from being fully human-
being the literal definition of " the narrator of the story " down to being only really a disembodied voice who can possess a flesh but is naturally without one is a big one; the fact that he'll occasionally name himself separately from humans is another.
& i SUPPOSE you could say that his more " supernatural " abilities also discredit him as human, but if we're being honest, most of those rely on visual tricks he can play on others / just playing with his code to soup himself up a bit more; for the most part, its all just party tricks or technicalities;
i almost want to say its more of a grey, ambiguous area that begs the question if being human is constrained to being a solid flesh & blood mass or if you can lack that, but with every intent & purpose of your being, you are as human as it comes...
but that's a very profound question to ask with a silly little man like the narrator, isn't it?
SIMPLE ANSWER? probably not, at least by traditional means. the narrator is simply an omnipresent presence that- despite being just a step behind being your average joe, can only possess a human-looking form but for that reason alone, wouldn't actually be considered one. that's vegan human or something for you baby
DEFINITIVE ANSWER? would you consider a ghost a human?
24 notes
·
View notes