I swear they look better online-
Anyways I can’t send via iPad bcs my phone is the only thing with vpn (so it’s my only connection to social media for now)
Enjoy the three shitty sketches I guess idk what I was on i snorted three lines of colour theory behind the Bejing palace- who the fuck said that not me
I am going insane because I have to constantly sit i the backseat of the car with my lil bro and his inane jabbering constantly assaults my ears when I am trying to listen to jrwi
Also yes I started listening to jrwi it’s good
I fuck with the colour theory
16 notes
·
View notes
unpacking 'sinophone' and its sinophobic roots
so. it never occurred to me to just type "sino diaspora" into google before.
and google is like "oi!! you meant sinophone yeah? here's wikipedia on sinophone" and here's like the other top results
I'm squinting. What the hell do you academics have against diaspora using the term diaspora?? I click.
inb4 this whole rant: I have no qualms with using sinophone as a language-family-use descriptor (like sinophone media), but coming from academia or as an academic field unto itself. but. the literature about wanting to use it as a demographics thing & separate it from "chineseness". just. looook
if anyone knows that they're no longer like this let me know. with what im seeing, im having a bad faith moment
so... this is the academic that's hard pushed the term for sinophone.
"crit on orientalism might be complicit for allowing Chinese intellectuals to call themselves victim under an 'unreflective' nationalism" & "but the flipside may be a new imperialism" yeah?? any more unsubstantiated claims???
What a joke!! Clearly only takes authority about Chinese history from western sources, like literally has the uncritical echo of "X country doesn't deserve territorial integrity" that literally fueled western imperialism, and not just of China. Treaty of Nanjing 1842 ringing no bells? Sigh. National sovereignty is the barest basis against overt imperialism where someone just comes over and declares where you live their colony!!! ... is this a test in how far can you stretch the definition of imperialism or colonization? lmfao, China invests in poverty-relieving measures like building houses and improving infrastructure out in Tibet, Guizhou, Xinjiang, and you have the audacity to call that colonizing?!? 我真无言了。
different article by the same person:
laughable to think that the Chinese state even bothers to think I exist, let alone talk to me about my diaspora status. (I was born in the US)
also, people are really out there saying 'diaspora has an end date' huh
here it is. here is the 'scholar' conflating American or western imperialism with things Big Bad Scary Red China does.
Clearly mixing up concepts of tributary system with colonialism, and acting like historically (other than Yuan era under Genghis) that ancient China/Chinese culture was expansionist, going around trying to conquer peoples and set up colonies. Admiral Zheng He would spit on you.
Comparing the spread of culture and language in Ancient China to the colonization and subjugation that the French/Belgium did in Africa, or the British Empire, or the Spanish and Portuguese in Latin America, is so blatantly dishonest. The indigenous people of Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang still speak their own languages and use their own scripts, and yes, they learn them in schools alongside the national language... which is Chinese!!! Yes the Hanyu writing system was adopted and adapted by many neighboring cultures in ancient times, but you literally don't examine WHY? The fluidity in its system: frequently non-Han peoples invented characters to suit their language, like there's even some Canto-specific characters that are in use today. Another reason that Chinese writing system was so popular was because two Sinitic language speakers who do not speak the same language could communicate through the same script. Yeah, Ancient Chinese scholars and dignitaries often had an insufferable elite-ness and superiority complex, but describing their attitude as subjugating and forcing other people to adopt their system? What a wildly malicious mischaracterisation!
just... mask off, gringo butt-licker.
Please. where is the "Chinese containment" policy? The white papers reaffirming what the international community agrees, what Taiwan historically agrees (tho Taiwan held that it was the true capital/head of all of China), that Taiwan is part of China?? I know this article was written back in 2010s but are you seriously comparing American weapons deals and boots on the ground with Chinese military exercises in Chinese territory that haven't harmed a single civilian? "critical" my ass!
gotta love the title of this one. yeah, I know it, I've seen it before. the Chinese or feminist binary, pick a side /s
but hey in this piece she admits she's ignorant and unobjective and out of her league sometimes?
edit: found this:
yeah that about seals it for me. anti"diaspora" sinophobe
36 notes
·
View notes
US ban on TikTok “not fair” – China’s Foreign Ministry
A Chinese foreign ministry official criticised a US bill to force the sale or ban TikTok, arguing on Thursday that there was “no fairness to speak of” in citing national security to reduce other countries’ competitive advantage.
A bill passed overwhelmingly by the US House of Representatives on Wednesday would give Chinese TikTok owner, ByteDance, around six months to sell the app’s US assets or face a ban.
Wang Wenbin, a ministry spokesman, responded to the US move as follows:
“The US House of Representatives passing this bill lets the United States stand on the opposite side of the principles of fair competition and international trade rules. If so-called national security reasons can be used to wilfully suppress other countries’ superior companies, there would be no fairness to speak of.”
China persistently argued that the US was overemphasising the concept of national security, with Wang saying its actions were disrupting the normal international trade order and would eventually have unpleasant consequences.
The US increasing the (serious) handling of this matter lets the world see clearly whether the United States’ so-called rules-based competition is beneficial to the world or is only self-serving.
Read more HERE
3 notes
·
View notes
New episode of Tech Newsday! This week covering:
The latest, all new trump indictment
China limits the screentime of Chinese youth
Elon gives an option to hide the blue checkmark of shame
Tesla wrapped up in scandal
Space X does a pollution
2 notes
·
View notes
In The News Today:1/4/2023
In The News Today:1/4/2023
US News, World News, Politics, Commentary.
US News:
Pregnant LA woman, 25, is shot and killed in ‘targeted’ drive-by execution as she waited in car for her father to pick up a birthday cake:
Marissa Perez, 25, was four months pregnant when she was shot several times, including once in the head, while waiting at an intersection in Artesia.
A car pulled up to the passenger side of the vehicle…
View On WordPress
2 notes
·
View notes
China’s economic growth falls to 0.4% amid virus shutdowns
China’s economic growth falls to 0.4% amid virus shutdowns
China’s economic growth plunged to 0.4 per cent over a year earlier in the latest quarter after Shanghai and other cities were shut down to fight coronavirus outbreaks, but the government said a “stable recovery” is underway.
The world’s second-largest economy shrank by 2.6%, compared with the January-March period’s already weak quarter-on-quarter rate of 1.4%, official data showed Friday.…
View On WordPress
3 notes
·
View notes
china news today live
Chinese Ice cream: What is Chinese frozen yogurt made of? It doesn't dissolve even at a temperature of 31 degrees
Read more: https://nyanmoni.blogspot.com/2022/07/blog-post_10.html
2 notes
·
View notes
Taiwan condemns Qatar for 'politicising' World Cup amid China spat
New Post has been published on https://www.timesofocean.com/taiwan-condemns-qatar-for-politicizing-world-cup-amid-china-spat/
Taiwan condemns Qatar for 'politicising' World Cup amid China spat
Taipei (The Times Groupe)- Taiwan’s Foreign Ministry criticized the organizers of the World Cup in Qatar on Wednesday for claiming Taiwanese fans may be listed as Chinese, and demanded they not allow “improper political factors” to influence sporting events.
Taiwan is a democratically-governed country that takes issue with China’s claims to sovereignty and, in particular, its attempt to claim Taiwanese people as Chinese.
The Hayya card, which serves as a fan identification card as well as their entry visa to Qatar, is required for all World Cup ticket holders.
Taiwan was not listed as a nationality on the application system Tuesday, and a senior Qatari official said Taiwanese were likely to be listed as Chinese on the card.
On Wednesday, the online system listed “Taiwan, Province of China”, terminology that is equally offensive to Taiwan’s government and its people, though it did display a Taiwanese flag, a symbol anathema to China.
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Joanne Ou said it was “unacceptable to belittle our country” and they were asking organizers to “immediately correct their ways”.
“The Foreign Ministry urges the organizers of the World Cup that improper political factors not taint simple sports activities and sporting venues that value fair competition and emphasize the spirit of the athletes,” she said.
Sports organizers should let sports be sports and give fans around the world “a clean World Cup football event”.
World Cup organizers did not immediately respond to the comments. Qatar’s communication office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Taiwan participates in most international sporting events as “Chinese Taipei” to avoid political problems with Beijing.
It has never been to a World Cup finals and lost all eight matches in the second round of the Asian qualifying for the 2022 tournament last year.
Taiwan does not have diplomatic relations with Qatar, which, like most countries, only recognizes China’s government.
China has stepped up its pressure on countries and foreign companies to refer to Taiwan as part of China in official documents and on websites, often using the phrase “Taiwan, Province of China”, or “Taiwan, China”.
Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, responded to questions about Taiwan’s complaints to the Qatar World Cup organizers by affirming that “Taiwan is part of China”.
“The one China principle is a basic norm of international relations, and it is widely acknowledged by the international community,” Wang told reporters at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Wednesday.
2 notes
·
View notes