We shouldn't give fascists a place to live. As in, you shouldn't let people who are bigots into fandom spaces, aesthetic cultures, or social media platforms.
By saying "If you like (thing that has nothing to do with fascism) you're a fascist dni", you're willingly giving fascists a place to stay, and letting them take a perfectly innocent subculture in the process.
Case in point: punks
Facists, ever since punks and punk activism, including lgbt and racial punk activism began to rise, took a liking to the punk aesthetic. They liked punk clothes, they made them feel powerful. So, they wore punk clothes.
This started to give the punk scene a bad look (for obvious reasons), and ordinary people started to confuse good punks (not facists) with bad punks (fascists), and there was a massive movement to completely eradicate fascism from punk spaces, resulting in what you may know as the doc martens "shoe lace code" in which white supremacists wear white shoelaces on doc martens, as well as the "Nazi punks fuck off" t-shirts, signs, and patches for jackets.
This movement was very successful.
So why, then, op, are you explaining this to us?
Well, little children, in my old age you learn to recognize patterns and use them to your advantage.
On: Cottagecore
The want to live on a farm in the middle of nowhere is not inherrently harmful. The want to look at pictures of cows, grow your own food, tend to your own animals, is not inherrently harmful. The aesthetic of cottagecore, and the ideals that go with it, are not inherrently harmful. This is cottagecore. The want to be a farmer, a nomad, or a polite witch in the middle of the woods.
People who reblog photos of flowers and cows are not colonizers. They don't colonize new land, they aren't inherrently facist by wanting to live unbothered in the middle of the woods.
Now, there are people, however, who actually buy and tend to land, either as a result of cottagecore, or they already did this before they got into cottagecore. These people are not inherrently harmful either. However, for these people, I suggest that you do research to find the specific group of original owners of the land by contacting the most nearby native government official, or by extensively looking it up, in order to ask them how to be respectful to it, if they would like you to pay rent, or if they want it back. Preferably do this before you purchase the land, but you can also do so after.
All of the above that I have said is the essence of cottagecore without the fascist taint. This is cottagecore. This is how it should be.
But op, you're still just telling us things, you're not making an argument you're just presenting contextual evidence!
Oh, how observant of you! Yes, I'll get to that right now.
What you, yes, you should do, is the following:
Don't call people facist for interacting with cottagecore, participating in it or being interested in it. Why? Because, dear reader, most all people in cottagecore aren't fascists.
The people that ARE the problem, are people who don't think that colonizing native land is wrong. By telling people that they're bad people for posting cottagecore, you're completely ignoring something. The bad thing that they agree with isn't cottagecore, the bad thing that they agree with is colonization.
If these people listen to you, and completely stop interacting with cottagecore, instead of understanding that colonization is wrong, they'll just find a new aesthetic, and they won't learn anything.
Instead of targeting cottagecore, which is an aesthetic, not a political ideology, target colonizers and facists within those groups. Within all groups. Facists don't deserve a place to live in ANY space. Not aesthetic spaces, not fandoms, and certainly not safe spaces.
(p.s. if any natives want to add anything that I missed, go ahead.)
33 notes
·
View notes