Tumgik
#alex michelsen
fritzes · 22 days
Text
youtube
I need everyone to see this
12 notes · View notes
stateofsport211 · 5 months
Text
NextGen Finals 2023: Challenger Frequents Making their Mark
An Introductory Post to the NextGen Finalists 2023
Tumblr media
The NextGen ATP Finals 2023 logo (📸 ATP Tour)
The field for this year’s NextGen Finals, which will be held in Jeddah (Saudi Arabia) during the last weeks of November, has been set. Interestingly, just like parts of the field last year, all contenders made their mark in the ATP Challenger Tour throughout the year, which became part of the tennis Tour that showcased their potential even deeper.
This post will celebrate the next generation of tennis, serving as a recap of their season and what to expect before the Bootcamp, where everyone will get to know them better in a series of off-court challenges in one of the innovations of this year’s NextGen Finals. Furthermore, with an emphasis on the Challenger Tour, this would hopefully bring more exposure to the Challenger Tour, which became the intermediary between the rising players, those trying to rediscover their form, and those still trying to break even.
For this year, the NextGen Finals qualifying window was open until November 20, 2023, the day after the finals in 5 Challenger events this year were held. Eventually, it all came down to that week due to a possibly tight race between several players concurrently playing in several tournaments, especially Kobe and Montevideo. It took a while for the ATP to eventually finalize the finalists, and they officially announced the last 3 qualifiers earlier this Monday (November 20) despite the field looking set by the end of the second round of Kobe. They will be drawn into two groups on November 25, 2023, playing in the best-of-five mini-sets (first to 4 games).
Hereby introducing the NextGen Finalists:
1. Arthur Fils
Tumblr media
Arthur Fils during the Montpellier (250) (📸 Next Gen ATP Finals via JB Autissier)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Arthur Fils' points to break 2-1 in the second set of the Oeiras 2 Challenger final against Joris de Loore (left), and to take the second set 7-5 in the Aix-en-Provence Challenger first round against Gregoire Barrere (right) (📸 ATP Challenger Livestream)
Starting this year one line below the Top 250, Fils’ meteoric rise commenced in Oeiras 2 Challenger, the start of his season, where he won the title against the previous week’s winner, Joris de Loore, 6-1, 7-6(4) through his predominantly working first serves and notably fiery passes, which often carried him until today. He continued the streak by being the Quimper Challenger runner-up to Gregoire Barrere 1-6, 4-6, which earned him the wild card to the Montpellier (250), where he became an eventual semifinalist to Jannik Sinner, as well as being a semifinalist of Marseille (250) to Benjamin Bonzi.
Since then, his potential flourished despite the rollercoaster clay season, with winning Lyon (250) as the pinnacle of his season (d. Francisco Cerundolo 6-3, 7-5), followed by a semifinal appearance in Hamburg (500) several weeks later, closing the season with a runner-up finish in Antwerp (250, l. Alexander Bublik). As a reward for his remarkable season, not only did he become the first qualifier for the NextGen Finals, but he also achieved a career-high ranking of 36 by the end of October.
2. Luca van Assche
Tumblr media
Luca van Assche's reaction upon winning the longest Challenger final of the year in Pau Challenger (📸 Tennis.com)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Luca van Assche's point to create his match point to 5-3* 40-ad in the second set of the Sanremo Challenger final against Juan Pablo Varillas (left), and to 4-3* 15-0 in the second set of the Aix-en-Provence Challenger against Andy Murray (right) (📸 ATP Challenger Livestream)
After breaking through the Top 150 by the end of 2022, van Assche had a relatively slow start to the year until he became the runner-up of the Pau Challenger at the beginning of March, where he got defeated by a resurgent Ugo Humbert in a high-quality match that lasted almost 4 hours 7-6(5), 4-6, 7-6(6) in the finals. The form did not stop until he cracked the Top 100 for the first time upon advancing to the semifinals of the Sanremo Challenger but further confirmed it once he straightforwardly defeated Juan Pablo Varillas 6-1, 6-3 for the title.
After a different set of rollercoasters in the clay season, including a notable defeat to Andy Murray in the Aix-en-Provence Challenger, van Assche continued his season beyond Challengers, as he made it to the second round of Eastbourne (250) as a qualifier, got eliminated against J.J. Wolf 2-6, 7-6(5), 1-6. During the indoor season, he made more noise again in the Orleans Challenger, where he lost against the eventual runner-up Jack Draper 5-7, 3-6 in the semifinals. He then sealed his season with a quarterfinal loss against a comeback Pierre-Hugues Herbert 6-4, 3-6, 5-7, ranking 66th by the time of this writing right before the NextGen Finals.
3. Dominic Stricker
Tumblr media
Dominic Stricker celebrated as he stunned Stefanos Tsitsipas in the US Open second round (📸 DAZN Germany via Getty Images)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Dominic Stricker's point to create one of his break points to 4-3* 40-ad in the second set of the finals of the first Prague Challenger against Sebastian Ofner (left, 📸 ATP Challenger Livestream) and also create one of his break points to *0-1 40-ad in the second set of the US Open third qualifying round against Thiago Agustin Tirante (right, 📸 Eurosport)
Despite his great potential being discovered last year (thus his NextGen Finals debut then), Stricker had to overcome several injuries and moments before he got to where he is today. Started the year straight to the Australian Open qualifying rounds, where he lost to Enzo Couacaud 7-6(2), 7-6(7) in one of the earliest Top 100 matches (when he was 18-19 lines away), he went on to win his second career Challenger title in Rovereto back in February (d. Giulio Zeppieri 7-6(8), 6-2), having won won his maiden Challenger title in Bergamo last year, followed by a home semifinal run in Lugano (l. Otto Virtanen). He then added Prague 1 Challenger to the list of the Challenger titles he won this year (d. Sebastian Ofner 7-6(7), 6-3), subsequently becoming a lucky loser in Roland Garros upon his third qualifying round loss against Thiago Agustin Tirante, which further asked the question on his ability to qualify for the Grand Slams due to the pressure moments he succumbed to during.
However, Stricker started steadily announcing himself on the bigger stage starting the grass season, steadily striking the ball more effectively and visibly improving during the pressure points/moments. Appeared competitive in the quarterfinals match of the Ilkley Challenger against Andy Murray despite the 6-7(5), 5-7 loss, and found himself qualified for Wimbledon after enduring a 4-set match against Mattia Bellucci in the third qualifying round. He then qualified for the US Open despite the subpar mini-clay season and build-up and asserted his revenge against Tirante (to whom he lost the final qualifying round in Roland Garros), successfully advancing to the fourth round in a competitive loss against Taylor Fritz after winning his third-round match against Benjamin Bonzi. Eventually, despite the end-of-season rollercoaster, his quarterfinal run in Basel (500) (l. Ugo Humbert) confirmed his Top 100 finish attained back in the US Open but unfortunately had to retire (for likely precautionary measures) in Ismaning Challenger at 7-6(2), 1-4 against Rudolf Molleker in hopes to be ready for his second NextGen Finals appearance.
4. Flavio Cobolli
Tumblr media
Flavio Cobolli in action during Olbia Challenger (📸 OA Sport)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Flavio Cobolli's point to break 4-3 in the first set of the Roland Garros third qualifying round against Laurent Lokoli (left, 📸 France TV Sport), and to take the second set 6-4 during the Milan Challenger final against Facundo Diaz Acosta (right, 📸 ATP Challenger Livestream)
Trying to live up to his discovered potential last year thanks to his aggressive play (and often going deep on important occasions), Cobolli started his season with a second-round run in Pune (250), where he lost against Botic van de Zandschulp 5-7, 4-6. He then started to sparkle in Munich (250), where he ended up as a quarterfinalist (l. Christopher O’Connell), followed by a semifinal showing in Rome (Italy) Challenger (l. Jesper de Jong) and Milan Challenger (l. Facundo Diaz Acosta). In a similar timeframe (clay season, its extension, and Challenger’s own clay season), he also qualified for the Roland Garros, where he ended up being defeated by Carlos Alcaraz 0-6, 2-6, 5-7 in the first round. Fast-forward to the end of July, in almost the same tournament he finally got himself known in Umag (250), he became a quarterfinalist after the loss against Matteo Arnaldi in an all-Italian-NextGen showing.
He then continued his stellar showing in the clay Challengers, where he reached the semifinals in Tulln (l. Sumit Nagal) and won the title in a close encounter in Lisbon (d. Benjamin Hassan 7-5, 7-5), citing Cristiano Ronaldo as his title run inspiration during the post-finals press conference. Furthermore, outside of the clay-court Challengers, he still managed to maintain the streak in the Olbia Challenger, where he was out-paced by Titouan Droguet during the finals, hence his runner-up finish after a 3-6, 4-6 loss. After two early exits in Bergamo and Helsinki Challengers, both of which were indoor hard tournaments, Cobolli had a semifinal showing in Danderyd by defeating Gilles Arnaud Bailly in the first round 6-4, 6-1, advanced to the quarterfinals at the cost of Gauthier Onclin’s withdrawal before winning against Radu Albot 6-4, 7-6(5) in a close encounter that confirmed his NextGen Finals qualification, but was overwhelmed when dealing with eventual champion Maximilian Marterer’s serve+1s in the semifinal.
5. Alex Michelsen
Tumblr media
Alex Michelsen in Newport, where he became the runner-up to Adrian Mannarino (📸 ATP Tour)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Alex Michelsen's point to break 2-0 in the second set of the Rome, GA Challenger quarterfinals against Edan Leshem (top left), to take the second set 6-1 in the second Cary Challenger second round against Strong Kirchheimer (top right), and to *2-3 30-30 in the first set of the Knoxville Challenger second round against Gabriel Debru (bottom) (📸 ATP Challenger Livestream).
Starting the year precisely at World No. 600, A. Michelsen’s rise started in the Rome, Georgia (USA) Challenger in February, where he became the runner-up to Jordan Thompson 4-6, 2-6 right after becoming the runner-up of the ITF M25 Malibu (Jan 2) and winning the ITF M15 Edmond, Oklahoma (Jan 23), followed by a semifinal showing in Waco Challenger a week after Rome, GA, which earned him the wild card to the Indian Wells M1000 qualifying (l. Leandro Riedi in Q1). After another solid showing in the ITFs (including a runner-up in M25 Calabasas-Mar 20), A. Michelsen started to get out of his comfort zone and tried the Nottingham Challenger in the grass courts of the United Kingdom (l. Gabriel Diallo in R2 6-3, 5-7, 2-6 as a qualifier) and had a competitive appearance in Mallorca (250) as a qualifier (l. Christopher Eubanks in R1 3-6, 7-6(5), 5-7) before winning his maiden Challenger title in Chicago (d. Yuta Shimizu 7-5, 6-2), further strengthening his explosive and intuitive play as the year progressed.
A week after his Chicago Challenger title, he became a runner-up in the grass courts of Newport (250), where Adrian Mannarino eventually won 6-2, 6-4 and after notably defeating Maxime Cressy, James Duckworth, Mackenzie McDonald, and John Isner from the first round until the semifinals. However, the next few tournaments became tricky with the Top 100 in sight, including a semifinal loss against eventual champion Zachary Svajda in the Cary 2 Challenger. He then got his rewards to finally enter the Top 100 for the first time after winning the Knoxville Challenger title, when he survived four three-setters in five rounds, defeating Denis Kudla 7-5, 4-6, 6-2 as the pinnacle, solidified his position by defeating Bernard Tomic 6-4, 6-0 in the Champaign Challenger’s first round in a rematch of their last week’s close encounter in Knoxville. Ultimately, A. Michelsen became the runner-up of the Champaign Challenger to Patrick Kypson, where he confirmed his NextGen Finals participation, as well as his Australian Open 2024 main draw direct entry likelihood thanks to his Top 100 year-end finish, landing at 94 live.
6. Hamad Medjedovic
Tumblr media
Hamad Medjedovic celebrated after defeating Jiri Lehecka in Astana (250) for the biggest win in his career (by then) (📸 ATP Tour via Kazakhstan Tennis Federation)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Hamad Medjedovic's point to 6-5* 15-30 in the second set of the Bengaluru Challenger semifinal against Max Purcell (top left, 📸 ATP Challenger Livestream), to create the break point to *0-1 40-ad in the second qualifying round of Roland Garros against Juan Manuel Cerundolo (top right, 📸 France TV Sport), and to 6-5* 15-0 in the third set of the Danderyd Challenger second round against Jakub Mensik (bottom, 📸 ATP Challenger)
Medjedovic came a long way after his rise last year, winning the Luedenscheid Challenger 2022 by double-breadsticking Zhizhen Zhang, steadily answering the doubt on whether or not he’s breaking even, even if he has Novak Djokovic’s support. After having a slow start to the season (and an even slower second semester of 2022), he started having deep runs in the Bengaluru Challenger, where he was eliminated in the semifinal against eventual champion Max Purcell 2-6, 7-5, 6-7(4). However, he then started his stellar Challenger clay season with a title in Szekesfehervar Challenger (d. Nino Serdarusic 6-4, 6-3), followed by another title in Mauthausen (d. Filip Misolic 6-2, 6-7(5), 6-4) in a rain-ridden dramatic match. To top it off, he qualified for the Roland Garros and Wimbledon but got eliminated against Marcos Giron and Christopher O’Connell in the first round, respectively.
Trying to rise the ranks to the main Tour, he followed those up by having several great runs in the 250s and the Challengers in the second half of 2023, carried by his powerful serve and forehands when they are on (and occasionally, drop shots and volleys to add to his intuitive play). He started with a semifinal run in Gstaad as a qualifier (l. Pedro Cachin 3-6, 1-6, with a notable win against Dominic Thiem in the second round in a rematch of their Mauthausen Challenger semifinal encounter, as well as winning the Mallorca Challenger (d. Harold Mayot 6-2, 4-6, 6-2). He topped those runs off with a semifinal run in Astana (250) (l. Sebastian Korda, with some notable wins against Alexander Shevchenko and Jiri Lehecka in the second round and quarterfinals, respectively) despite the early exits in the last 3 250-level tournaments (Antwerp (250) R1, Basel (500) Q1, and Sofia (250) R1). Subsequently, after defeating Stefano Travaglia 6-4, 6-3 in a chaotic first-round match, he was defeated by fellow up-and-coming NextGen player Jakub Mensik 4-6, 7-6(2), 7-6(8) in the second round, having his 3 match points saved, 2 of them in the second set and one when he should have served for the match. Recognizing his tremendous potential through his aggressive gameplay and often reliable serves, while his usual rollercoaster could be expected, it all depended on his intuition in handling the point construction within the longer rallies if he could not keep it short.
7. Luca Nardi
Tumblr media
Luca Nardi won the Porto Challenger title in August this year, gifting himself his birthday present after three hard-fought sets (📸 ATP Tour via Porto Open)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Luca Nardi's point to 6-5* 0-15 in the third set of the Pune Challenger semifinal against Dominik Palan (left) and to take the third set 7-5 in Kobe Challenger against August Holmgren (right) (📸 ATP Challenger Livestream)
Another name with potential being further discovered since last year is Luca Nardi, who answered the doubts coming from his sloppy start of the year by making strides toward the end of the year, thus rewarded with NextGen Finals qualification. He exited in early rounds in the first one-two months of the calendar before reaching the finals of the Pune Challenger, where he became the runner-up to a red-hot Max Purcell 3-6, 2-6. The rollercoaster then continued to the clay season, where he was remembered for being double-bageled by Lorenzo Musetti during the second round as a qualifier during the Monte Carlo M1000, as well as advancing to at least the quarterfinals in several Challengers, notably in Vicenza (l. Pablo Llamas Ruiz) and Milan (l. Matteo Gigante).
Realizing the whole rollercoaster, L. Nardi’s more offensive approach to complement his defenses and return depth started to pay off in Porto Challenger back in August, where he pulled a comeback win against Joao Sousa 5-7, 6-4, 6-1 as a sweet birthday present he gifted himself. Since then, his trajectory has gone back on track by being the semifinalist of the Bratislava 2 Challenger (l. Joris de Loore) and finally took the title in the Matsuyama Challenger in another comeback fashion (d. Taro Daniel 3-6, 6-4, 6-2), securing his NextGen Finals place after his second-round victory in the Kobe Challenger just to start the week (d. August Holmgren 6-3, 3-6, 7-5) before falling to Sho Shimabukuro to the semifinals, showing that his decision to partake in the Japanese Challenger swing paid off for his almost last-minute qualification.
8. Abdullah Shelbayh [WC]
Tumblr media
Abdullah Shelbayh during his first-round match in Doha (250) (📸 The Hindu via Abdullah Shelbayh's Instagram post)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Abdullah Shelbayh's point to *5-2 40-40 (one of the break points saves) in the second set of the second-round Tenerife 3 Challenger match against Ryan Peniston (top left), to break 5-2 in the second set of the Manama Challenger semifinal against Salvatore Caruso (top right), and to *0-0 40-ad (second break point) in the Charleston Challenger final against Oliver Crawford (bottom) (📸 ATP Challenger Livestream)
Hailing from Jordan and training in Rafa Nadal Academy under Princess Lara Faisal’s Rise for Good Foundation, Shelbayh exceptionally started the season as a runner-up of the ITF M25 Manacor against Daniel Rincon (Jan 23) in a marathon match to start his positive semester after his remarkable rise kicked off in the second semester of 2022, from winning ITF M25 Monastir on two occasions (Jul 18 & Aug 22, 2022) before closing that year by winning ITF M15 Trnava (Dec 5) against Daniel Rincon, several months after securing his Challenger debut with a semifinal appearance (l. Zizou Bergs, but notably d. 1st seed Dominic Stricker in the first round). The only way was up, which he proved throughout the 2023 season by reaching the second round in Tenerife 3 Challenger as a qualifier (l. Ryan Peniston), ultimately becoming the runner-up in his maiden Challenger final in Manama (l. Thanasi Kokkinakis). He backed this up with his maiden ATP Tour main draw appearance in Doha as a wild card despite the first-round loss against Soonwoo Kwon.
He kept gaining experience as the year passed by from the aforementioned raw potential, making a last-minute decision to partake in the Banja Luka qualification rounds, stunning then-have not broken out (yet) Fabian Marozsan and Lukas Klein in both qualifying rounds before defeating Elias Ymer 6-1, 7-5 in the first round to record his maiden Tour-level victory (as well as becoming the first Jordanian to win a main Tour match) but was eliminated in the hands of Miomir Kecmanovic. He also qualified for the Mallorca (250) event on grass (l. Roman Safiullin in the first round) and went on to win his maiden Challenger title in Charleston (d. Oliver Crawford 6-2, 6-7(5), 6-3), also becoming the first Jordanian Challenger-level champion. His sparkling rise continued through Metz (250) as a qualifier (d. Dan Added & Gijs Brouwer in the qualifying rounds), shocking Hugo Gaston 7-6(5), 6-2 before Lorenzo Sonego defeated him 3-6, 5-7 despite his competitive efforts. Aided by his often impressive point construction (as displayed), when he is on, not only rewarded him his career-high ranking of 187 (attained Nov 20, 2023) but also a wild card to this year’s NextGen Finals as the regional (Middle Eastern) representative.
9 notes · View notes
daikenkki · 4 days
Text
youtube
1 note · View note
sportworldtone · 1 month
Text
Alex Michelsen
Alex Michelsen is an international American tennis player. As of 2024, his net worth is estimated to be 2 million USD. This impressive figure is a testament to his success and the recognition he has garnered in his career. You'll get here Alex Michelsen Tennis Career, Net Worth, Age, Wife, and Family
Tumblr media
0 notes
fortyfive-forty · 2 months
Text
caroline wozniacki (204) is the lowest ranked player left in the wta draw
luca nardi (123) is the lowest ranked player left in the atp draw
wta provisional nchs: marta kostyuk (28 -> 27), yue yuan (49 -> 42), diane parry (58 -> 53), hailey baptiste (105 -> 96)
atp provisional nchs: jannik sinner (3 -> 2), alexander bublik (20 -> 18), tomáš macháč (62 -> 60), jakub menšík (81 -> 69), alex michelsen (73 -> 72), luca nardi (123 -> 95), sumit nagal (97 -> 96), duje ajduković (120 -> 116), sheng juncheng (139 -> 124), lukáš klein (133 -> 128), patrick kypson (137 -> 144)
10 notes · View notes
musispoedarsiv · 5 months
Text
2 Aralık 2023 Arthur Fils Hamad Medjedovic Maçı
*Kral Abdullah Spor Şehri Merkez Kort'ta saat 20:00'de başlayacak olan NEOM Next Gen ATP Finalleri Final maçı. Sezonun özel kapanışında bakalım hangi isim geleceğe mesajını yollayacak? Güzel bir mücadele dileriz. İki tarafa da sağlıklı bir maç ve başarılar.
Her iki raketin de final yolu:
-Arthur Fils-
#Yeşil Grup = Luca Nardi (2-4/4-3[8-6]/4-2/1-4/4-2)
#Yeşil Grup = Flavio Cobolli (4-1/4-2/4-2)
#Yeşil Grup = Dominic Stricker (4-2/3-4[3-7]/4-2/4-3[7-5])
#Yarı Final = Luca Van Assche (2-4/4-1/4-3[7-1]/4-3[8-6])
-Hamad Medjedovic-
#Kırmızı Grup = Alex Michelsen (4-2/4-3[7-3]/3-4[3-7]/3-4[5-7]/4-3[7-4])
#Kırmızı Grup = Luca Van Assche (4-2/2-4/4-3[9-7]/4-1)
#Kırmızı Grup = Abdullah Shelbayh (3-4[6-8]/4-2/4-3[7-5]/4-2)
#Yarı Final = Dominic Stricker (4-3[7-5]/2-1,ret.)
*İlk seti 4-3[8-6] kazanan Fils 1-0 öne geçti. İki taraf da birbirini tartarak başladı. Tie-break'te Medjedovic çok etkili başlayıp 5-2'yi gördü ama Fils 2 set puanı çevirerek geri döndü.
*İkinci setin galibi 4-1 ile Medjedovic oldu ve durumu 1-1 yaptı. Sırp raket hızlı başladı ve öyle de rahat tamamladı bu bölümü.
*Üçüncü sette 4-2 üstünlük kuran Medjedovic maçı 2-1'e çevirmeyi başardı. İlk oyundaki break'le çok iyi idare etti ve büyük avantaj elde etti.
*Dördüncü set 4-3[11-9] Fils lehine sonuçlandı ve Fransız raket 2-2 ile maça tutundu. Tie-break'te özellikle heyecan yüksekti. Medjedovic 2 maç puanını değerlendiremedi. Fils ise üçüncü set puanında gülmeyi başardı. Şampiyon son sette belli olacak.
*Son seti 4-1 alan Medjedovic mücadeleyi 3-2 kazanarak şampiyonluğa ulaştı. Sırp raketten yine ikinci setteki gibi çok sağlam bir performans geldi ve turnuvanın 1 numarası önünde sevinci yaşamayı başardı.
0 notes
usnewsper-business · 8 months
Text
Alex Michelsen, a US Open Tennis Champion, Propelled by First Major Win #alexmichelsen #newyorktimes #sports #tennis #USOpen
0 notes
fritzes · 24 days
Text
ben left the "american guy who has no idea how to navigate clay" role and it was immediately occupied by alex michelsen
9 notes · View notes
stateofsport211 · 5 months
Text
NextGen F RR 🟥: Hamad Medjedovic [6] def. Alex Michelsen [4] 4-2, 4-3(3), 3-4(3), 3-4(5), 4-3(4) Match Stats
Tumblr media Tumblr media
📸 Tennis TV
The pressure points were mostly return-heavy, which showcased one part of both players’ power-play from their shots. While Medjedovic mostly relied on his powerful forehand to do the job, A. Michelsen often made exceptional passes that caught Medjedovic off-guard, thus asserting more pressure from the baseline while trying to make Medjedovic stay back. However, Medjedovic started most of the match aggressively (with deep returns), which helped him to win 57.7% points from the baseline compared to A. Michelsen’s 41.3% winning rate, where Medjedovic won twice more points from the net than A. Michelsen thanks to his intuitive approach while trying to prevent the fourth seed from passing further, carrying him through even a lot more trouble, especially in several notable moments of the match.
Interestingly, both players had some distinct strengths on serve. Firing the equal number of unreturned serves, Medjedovic had the higher percentage with 43.3% compared to A. Michelsen’s 36.1%, which often accounted to the former’s 89% first serve winning percentage, 23% more than A. Michelsen, which helped him through a lot of troubled times, as well as winning one more point on serve, which showed his service game’s reliability at times. Interestingly, A. Michelsen had a slight advantage through the second serves, winning 4% more points by double-faulting three less times than Medjedovic (4 to 7); on the other hand, both players scored almost the same number of aces, with Medjedovic scoring one more ace than A. Michelsen (14 to 13) as the match went by.
In tomorrow’s second match of the group stage, A. Michelsen will face eighth seed and wild card Abdullah Shelbayh, while Medjedovic will face second seed Luca van Assche. The standings showed that van Assche topped the Red Group with 75% set winning percentage than Medjedovic’s 60% with both players winning one set each. One of van Assche and Medjedovic, given a victory tomorrow, will most likely advance to the semifinals. However, since the field is still wide open depending on the next two days’ outcomes, the future is bright for everyone alike considering the deliverance of today’s matches in general, with neither player winning in straight sets from all groups. Tomorrow’s matches should also be some interesting watches/follows as well!
0 notes
daikenkki · 27 days
Text
youtube
0 notes
usnewsper-politics · 8 months
Text
Alex Michelsen, a US Open Tennis Champion, Propelled by First Major Win #alexmichelsen #newyorktimes #sports #tennis #USOpen
0 notes
fortyfive-forty · 2 months
Text
alex michelsen??? hello alex michelsen???? hello????? hello sir????? sir alex michelsen??????????
3 notes · View notes
antonio-velardo · 8 months
Text
Antonio Velardo shares: At the U.S. Open, Alex Michelsen Is Growing Up Fast by David Waldstein
By David Waldstein Michelsen, a 19-year-old American who passed on the University of Georgia to turn pro, has raced up the rankings since January and should break into the top 100 after his run in New York. Published: August 31, 2023 at 12:01AM from NYT Sports https://ift.tt/PkuCnX4 via IFTTT
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
newstodayjournal · 8 months
Text
At the U.S. Open, Alex Michelsen Is Growing Up Fast
Things some teenagers do that make adults crazy: spending too much time on devices, leaving dirty dishes in the sink and sending hard backhands down the line. Albert Ramos-Vinolas, 35, had seen enough of the latter from 19-year-old Alex Michelsen in their first-round encounter at the U.S. Open on Tuesday. After the final point of Michelsen’s surprisingly easy victory, 6-4, 6-3, 6-4, Ramos-Vinolas…
View On WordPress
0 notes
blogynews · 8 months
Text
"At the U.S. Open, Watch Alex Michelsen Blossom into a Tennis Prodigy"
Teenagers engaging in behaviors that annoy adults, such as excessive device usage and leaving dirty dishes, is a well-known source of frustration. However, in a recent first-round match at the U.S. Open, 19-year-old Alex Michelsen provoked an unexpected reaction from his opponent, 35-year-old Albert Ramos-Vinolas. After a relatively straightforward loss to Michelsen, 6-4, 6-3, 6-4, Ramos-Vinolas…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
blogynewz · 8 months
Text
"At the U.S. Open, Watch Alex Michelsen Blossom into a Tennis Prodigy"
Teenagers engaging in behaviors that annoy adults, such as excessive device usage and leaving dirty dishes, is a well-known source of frustration. However, in a recent first-round match at the U.S. Open, 19-year-old Alex Michelsen provoked an unexpected reaction from his opponent, 35-year-old Albert Ramos-Vinolas. After a relatively straightforward loss to Michelsen, 6-4, 6-3, 6-4, Ramos-Vinolas…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes