#Volume 48 Number 03 2014 | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

brightgnosis · 1 year

Text

[While renovating the second story floor of the threshing room of his circa 1840's barn], the owner was surprised to see a red-orange card drift to the snow covered ground as he turned over one of the planks. The card […] had slipped from an enclosure made of a single sheet of folded lead, which had been nailed to the bottom of a floor plank [… where] the enclosure had been positioned directly above an overlapping floor joist in order to hide it from view. Three nails- possibly representing the Holy Trinity, emphasized in Braucherei […] had been used to secure the sheet of lead with the cryptic card inside, and these had come loose during the dismantling of the floor. As this was the original floor for the c. 1840 barn, it can be safely assumed that the concealment had been carefully placed between the flooring and the joist at the time of the building's erection […]

The blessing consists of a dull red-orange card composed of heavy, cold-pressed, cotton-rag cardstock, measuring [3 inches by 4 inches], with rounded corners. Three holes can be found on the document, marking where the three nails originally secured it within its lead enclosure. The majority of the text of the blessing is in the English language [… and] begins: '[H]elp success come to my barn and stock, horses and cows'. This line is followed by a line of cypher, composed of dashes, dots, grids, and curvilinear characters. A line of astrological symbols divides the card into an upper and a lower section. Below these symbols, another English phrase continues: 'Success and good health come to all of our stock'. This is followed by another grouping of cypher, consisting of slashes and diacritic points. This cypher is very important, as it identifies that the barn blessing is probably the work of a practitioner of folk magic, an individual who would have used such a personalized magical script to enhance the overall arcane appeal of the talisman, rather than barn builders or farmers taking matters into their own hands.

Excepting the cypher script, which is unknown and unintelligible to me, the astrological components of the charm are easily recognizable as notations found in common Pennsylvania Dutch agricultural almanacs contemporaneous with the time of the building of the barn itself. The symbols are, beginning on the left of the blessing and proceeding to the right, representative of the Moon, the Sun, the planet Saturn, the sextile and trine aspects, as well as a character resembling the Greek capital letter sigma, or a capital M turned 90° to the left. This latter character may have been a stylization or corruption of the symbol for Jupiter. A number of early Pennsylvania almanacs that potentially may have been used as a reference for early practitioners were produced in a typeface that featured an idiosyncratic or italicized character for Jupiter, such as in Der Neue Americanische Landwirthschafts-Calender (The New American Agricultural Calendar).

The symbols for the aspects, while simple and geometric in form, are slightly more advanced components of the almanac, symbolizing planetary alignments by degree. The sextile aspect indicates that two or more planets are located within the celestial sphere at increments of 60° (or 360° divided by six), according to tradition portending a positive aspect to human interactions for the duration of the alignment, resulting in what an early 19th-century almanac describes as '[g]ut Freundschaft machen', or, the making of good friends. Likewise, the trine aspect divides the celestial sphere into three, which places two or more heavenly bodies at 180° increments, and its trine nature is believed to represent a positive relation between humankind and divinity, or as one early 19th-century century almanac suggests, 'für gut Beten', a time when prayers are likely to be answered. It is unclear which of the four heavenly bodies depicted on the blessing, if any, were intended to correspond to the aspects.

From “The Concealment of Written Blessings in Pennsylvania Barns” by Patrick Donmoyer; available in the Manifestations of Magic: The Archaeology and Material Culture of Folk Religion edition of the Journal of Historical Archaeology - Volume 48, Number 03, published 2014 (My Ko-Fi Here)

#The Concealment of Written Blessings in Pennsylvania Barns #Patrick Donmoyer #Manifestations of Magic: The Archaeology and Material Culture of Folk Religion #Journal of Historical Archaeology #Volume 48 Number 03 2014 #Quote #Pennsylvania Braucherei

2 notes · View notes

glitterymusicduck · 3 years

Text

Old Version Of Opera For Mac

Download the Opera browser for computer, phone, and tablet. Opera for Mac, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS. Free VPN, Ad blocker, built-in messengers. Is it possible to download an old version of Opera? For Mac OSX Lion? Download Old Version Opera The most full-featured Internet power tool on the market, Opera includes pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, integrated searches, and advanced functions like Opera's groundbreaking E-mail program, RSS Newsfeeds and IRC chat. Archived Opera versions. Legacy version of Opera for Mac, Windows, and Linux can be found in the Opera archive. User agent string/ID. The user agent string for Chromium-based versions of Opera resembles the Chrome string with an additional browser signature: OPR/version major.version minor.build.patch (edition). Opera has released a new version of its browser for mobile devices. Opera Touch is a new project with two main purposes in mind: to provide an interface that lets us browse using a single hand and to integrate the official desktop client with the Android version through an internal chat where you can send yourself texts and links.

Opera Old Versions Download

Download Old Version Of Opera For Mac

Opera For Mac Download Latest Version

Download Old Version Of Opera For Mac

Old Versions Of Opera Browser

Last update: 2019-04-09

This document provides a quick historical reference to Opera versions, release dates, release streams, rendering engines, JavaScript engine, user agent/ID strings formats, features, and improvements.

The information below describes version history for Opera browsers built using the WebKit/Chromium rendering engine, Opera versions 15.0 and above. For information about the landmarks developed in Opera’s Presto rendering engine and related Opera browsers, please see Opera’s archived version history.

Version downloads

Opera downloads for Mac, Windows, and Linux platforms:

Latest Opera features, security and stability release (final)

Opera highly recommends all users to update to the latest release.

Opera for Windows, Mac, and Linux computers.

Opera pre-release channel builds

WARNING: These are pre-release builds. Please use them only on properly backed up computers. They contain the latest changes, but may also have severe known issues, including crashes and data loss situations. In fact, they may not work at all.

Archived Opera versions

Legacy version of Opera for Mac, Windows, and Linux can be found in the Opera archive.

User agent string/ID

The user agent string for Chromium-based versions of Opera resembles the Chrome string with an additional browser signature:

OPR/[version major].[version minor].[build].[patch] (edition)

This signifies the name of the browser (OPR) followed by a series of numbers denoting the build.

An edition may be included in the string, if the build is from the developer or beta pre-release streams, or if the build has been custom-made for an Opera partner. For example, a developer channel release of Opera’s partner build with Yandex may have a signature that looks like:

OPR/25.0.1614.18 (Edition developer-Yx)

The full user agent string looks similar to this:

Opera Old Versions Download

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/50.0.2661.87 Safari/537.36 OPR/37.0.2178.31 (Edition beta)

This string will vary depending on your operating system and the build number you are using. Broken down, these objects mean:

Mozilla/[version]

Signifies the browser is Mozilla compatible.

(Operating system)

Signifies which platform and version of operating system the browser is running on.

AppleWebKit/[build]

Signifies the browser is WebKit compatible.

(Layout engine)

Signifies the layout engine used for rendering. KHTML is open-source and developed by the KDE project.

Chrome/[version, build, and patch]

Signifies the browser is Chrome compatible.

Safari/[build]

Signifies that the browser is Safari compatible.

OPR/[version, build, and patch]

Signifies the Opera browser signature (See above).

(Edition)

Signifies the edition of the Opera browser.

Download Old Version Of Opera For Mac

Feature facts

Opera For Mac Download Latest Version

Discover when an Opera feature was first introduced into the WebKit/Chromium based browsers (in alphabetical order).

FeatureIntroduced (date: version)Ad blocker2016-05-04: 37.0Animated PNG support2017-06-22: 46.0Autofill2013-08-27: 16.0Battery saver2016-06-08: 38.0Bookmarks bar2014-01-28: 19.0Bookmark manager2014-10-15: 25.0Chromecast support2018-01-04: 50.0Classic link selection (revived from Opera 12)2017-02-07: 43.0Click tab to scroll2018-02-07: 51.0Combined address and search bar2013-07-02: 15.0Copy page addresses2018-03-22: 52.0Crypto Wallet2019-04-09: 60.0 R3Cryptocurrency Mining Protection2018-01-04: 50.0Currency converter2016-13-12: 42.0Custom search2013-10-08: 17.0Dark theme2017-05-10: 45.0Desktop wallpaper in Opera2018-02-07: 51.0Discover (news feed)2013-07-02: 15.0Easy setup2017-11-08: 49.0Exportable bookmarks2017-08-09: 47.0Extensions2013-07-02: 15.0Geolocation2013-08-27: 16.0Heart menu2014-07-22: 23.0Instant Search2018-04-25: 52.0 R2Mac Touch Bar UI2017-03-21: 44.0Media access2013-11-19: 18.0Mouse gestures2013-07-02: 15.0My Flow2018-04-25: 52.0 R2News on Speed Dial2018-06-28: 54.0Off-Road mode2013-07-02: 15.0opera:flags2013-08-27: 16.0Opera Turbo (Turbo 2)2014-06-03: 22.0Optimized tab display2018-05-10: 53.0Pin tabs2013-10-08: 17.0Personalized newsreader2016-08-02: 39.0Rearrange extensions2017-11-08: 49.0Reset browser settings2018-02-07: 51.0Rocker gestures2013-11-19: 18.0Save web pages as PDF2018-01-04: 50.0Scroll to top of page by clicking active tab2018-09-25: 56.0Search pop up2016-08-02: 39.0Select multiple tabs2018-03-22: 52.0Sidebar messengers2017-05-10: 45.0Site settings in security badge pop-up2018-08-16: 55.0Snapshot2017-09-27: 48.0Snapshot with editing tools2017-11-08: 49.0Speed Dial2013-07-02: 15.0Stash2013-07-02: 15.0Sync services2015-03-10: 28.0Tab previews2014-09-02: 24.0Tab menu2015-01-27: 27.0Theme creation2014-01-28: 19.0Time zone converter2017-09-27: 48.0Unit converter2017-09-27: 48.0Update and Recovery page2018-06-28: 54.0URL suggestion removal2017-09-27: 48.0VPN (free, built-in)2016-09-20: 40.0VR Player2017-11-08: 49.0Warning before closing multiple tabs2019-01-23: 58.0WebAssembly2017-03-21: 44.0Web notifications2014-10-15: 25.0Video pop out2016-05-04: 37.0Volume control on video pop out2018-09-25: 56.0Zoom level indicator in address bar2018-09-25: 56.0

Download Old Version Of Opera For Mac

Version history

Old Versions Of Opera Browser

Opera 68Release date2020-04-22Rendering engineChromium 81JavaScript engineV8Features

Instagram in Sidebar

Search in tabs

Closing duplicate tabs

New security badges

Opera 67Release date2020-02-25Rendering engineChromium 80JavaScript engineV8Features

Workspaces

Duplicate tabs highlighter

Horizontal tab cycler

Sync – log in in the tab

Opera 66Release date2020-01-07Rendering engineChromium 79JavaScript engineV8Features

Extensions in Sidebar Pannel

Picture-in-picture

Opera 65 Release date2019-11-13Rendering engineChromium 78JavaScript engineV8Features

Bookmarks in the Sidebar Panel

Redesigned address bar

Opera 64Release date2019-10-07Rendering engineChromium 77JavaScript engineV8Features

Tracker blocking

Adblocking new flow

Opera 63Release date2019-08-20Rendering engineChromium 76JavaScript engineV8FeaturesOpera 62 – design updates to Reborn 3Release date2019-06-27Rendering engineChromium 75JavaScript engineV8Features

Crypto Wallet integration with Opera for Android and Opera Touch for iOS

Opera 60 – R3Release date2019-04-09Rendering engineChromium 73JavaScript engineV8Features

Crypto Wallet

Opera 59 betaRelease date(Final beta) 2019-02-28Rendering engineChromium 72JavaScript engineV8Features

Opera 60

Opera 58Release date2019-01-23Rendering engineChromium 71JavaScript engineV8Features

Warning before closing window with multiple tabs

Opera 57Release date2018-11-28Rendering engineChromium 70JavaScript engineV8Opera 56Release date2018-09-25Rendering engineChromium 69JavaScript engineV8Features

Scroll to top of page by clicking active tab

Zoom level indicator in address bar

Volume control on video pop out

Opera 55Release date2018-08-16Rendering engineChromium 68JavaScript engineV8Features

Site settings in security badge pop-up

Opera 54Release date2018-06-28Rendering engineChromium 67JavaScript engineV8Features

News on Speed Dial

Update and Recovery page

Opera 53Release date2018-05-10Rendering engineChromium 66JavaScript engineV8Features

Optimized tabs display

Opera 52 R2Release date2018-04-25Rendering engineChromium 65JavaScript engineV8Features

Instant Search

My Flow

Opera 52Release date2018-03-22Rendering engineChromium 65JavaScript engineV8Features

Select multiple tabs

Copy page addresses

Opera 51Release date2018-02-07Rendering engineChromium 64JavaScript engineV8Features

Click tab to scroll

Desktop wallpaper in Opera

Reset browser settings

Opera 50Release date2018-01-04Rendering engineChromium 63JavaScript engineV8Features

Cryptocurrency Mining Protection

Chromecast support

Save web pages as PDF

Opera 49Release date2017-11-08Rendering engineChromium 62JavaScript engineV8Features

Snapshot with editing tools

VR Player

Rearrange extensions

Easy setup

Opera 48Release date2017-09-27Rendering engineChromium 61JavaScript engineV8Features

Unit converter

Time zone converter

Snapshot

URL suggestion removal

Opera 47Release date2017-08-09Rendering engineChromium 60JavaScript engineV8Features

Exportable bookmarks

Opera 46Release date2017-06-22Rendering engineChromium 59JavaScript engineV8Features

Animated PNG support

Opera 45Release date2017-05-10Rendering engineChromium 58JavaScript engineV8Features

Sidebar messengers

Dark theme

Improved ad blocker

Refreshed UI

Opera 44Release date2017-03-21Rendering engineChromium 57JavaScript engineV8Features

Mac Touch Bar UI

WebAssembly

Opera 43Release date2017-02-07Rendering engineChromium 56JavaScript engineV8Features

Instant page loading

Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) for Windows

Classic link selection returns

Opera 42Release date2016-12-13Rendering engineChromium 55JavaScript engineV8Features

Built-in currency converter

Improved startup; smarter and faster

Newsreader shortcut in URL address bar

Network installer for Opera 64-bit

Opera 41Release date2016-10-25Rendering engineChromium 54JavaScript engineV8Features

Faster startup.

Longer battery time when video conferencing

Hardware-accelerated video pop-out

Personalized newsreader improvements

Stability enhancements and bug fixes

Opera 40Release date2016-09-20Rendering engineChromium 53JavaScript engineV8Features

Free, unlimited, no-log browser VPN service

Automatic battery saving

Chromecast support

Video pop-out improvements

Newsreader with RSS support

Stability enhancements and bug fixes

Opera 39Release date2016-08-02Rendering engineChromium 52JavaScript engineV8Features

Personalized newsreader

Improved video pop out

Customizable block lists to the native ad blocker

Search pop-up

Stability enhancements and bug fixes

Opera 38Release date2016-06-08Rendering engineChromium 51JavaScript engineV8Features

Battery saver

Ad blocker – add your own lists

Speed Dial improvements

Add your own photo as theme

Extension button visible in the Speed Dial side panel

Stability enhancements and bug fixes

Opera 37Release date2016-05-04Rendering engineChromium 50JavaScript engineV8Features

Built-in ad blocker makes webpages load faster

Video pop out displays video in a floating frame, always on top

Opera 36Release date2016-03-15Rendering engineChromium 49JavaScript engineV8Features

News feed on start page

Updated start page look and feel

Touch support for Windows 10

Opera 35Release date2016-02-02Rendering engineChromium 48JavaScript engineV8Features

Basic settings page

Mute button in tab bar

Active download warning on exit

Removal of bookmark duplicates

Optional separate search bar

Opera 34Release date2015-12-08Rendering engineChromium 47JavaScript engineV8Features

MSE audio playback

Share button on Mac

Opera 33Release date2015-10-27Rendering engineChromium 46JavaScript engineV8Features

Turbo 2 compression

Proprietary audio codec support

MIDI system-exclusive message settings

Protocol handler settings

Discontinued NPAPI support

Opera 32Release date2015-09-15Rendering engineChromium 45JavaScript engineV8Features

Animate themes

Sync passwords

Improved heart menu

Tree view for bookmark manager

Native Mac toolbars

Opera 31Release date2015-08-04Rendering engineChromium 44JavaScript engineV8Features

Widevine DRM support

Sync browsing history

Opera 30Release date2015-06-09Rendering engineChromium 43JavaScript engineV8Features

Extensions sidebar

Enhanced tab menu

Bookmarks trash folder

Sync browser settings

HTML5 MSE/H.264 support

Opera 29Release date2015-04-28Rendering engineChromium 42JavaScript engineV8Features

Improved start page look

Improved history manager

Sync open tabs

Sync and manage Speed Dial start pages

Audio indicator on the tab bar

Custom keyboard shortcuts

More mouse gestures

Opera 28Release date2015-03-10Rendering engineChromium 41JavaScript engineV8Features

Sync bookmarks with phones and tablets

Improved bookmark manager

Bookmarks suggestions in address bar

Increased H.264 support for Mac

Increased vibrancy for Mac menus

Opera 27Release date2015-01-27Rendering engineChromium 40JavaScript engineV8Features

Tab menu

Enhanced bookmark manager

Improved PPAPI support

Support for synthesized speech

New start page navigation

Opera 26Release date2014-12-03Rendering engineChromium 39JavaScript engineV8Features

Browser data import

Print preview

Bookmark sharing

Handoff support for Mac

Popover enhancement for Mac

Opera 25Release date2014-10-15Rendering engineChromium 38JavaScript engineV8Features

Bookmark manager

PDF viewer

Web notifications

Experimental start page

More support for HiDPI video and MP3 audio

Network installation on Mac

Opera 24Release date2014-09-02Rendering engineChromium 37JavaScript engineV8Features

Tab previews

HiDPI improvements on Windows

Darker window color for private browsing on Windows

Opera 23Release date2014-07-22Rendering engineChromium 36JavaScript engineV8Features

Heart menu in combined search and address bar

UI to allow blocked content in secure sessions

Opera 22Release date2014-06-03Rendering engineChromium 35JavaScript engineV8Features

HiDPI improvements

New default themes

Opera 21Release date2014-05-06Rendering engineChromium 34JavaScript engineV8Features

Aura implementation (Windows)

Option to display full URL in address bar

Broken padlock security badge

Opera 20Release date2014-03-04Rendering engineChromium 33JavaScript engineV8Features

Improved Stash screenshots

Draggable bookmarks

Speed Dial entry manual sizing

Opera 19Release date2014-01-28Rendering engineChromium 32JavaScript engineV8Features

Bookmarks bar

Theme creation

Advanced settings

Opera 18Release date2013-11-19Rendering engineChromium 31JavaScript engineV8Features

Media access

Rocker gestures

Theme installations via addons.opera.com

Opera 17Release date2013-10-08Rendering engineChromium 30JavaScript engineV8Features

Pinned tabs

Custom search

Startup behavior options

Opera 16Release date2013-08-27Rendering engineChromium 29JavaScript engineV8Features

opera:flags experimental test features

Geolocation and location sharing

Presentation mode for Mac

Task bar and start menu integration for Windows 7 and 8

Opera 15Release date2013-07-02Rendering engineChromium 28JavaScript engineV8Features

New rendering engine based on Chromium/Blink

New user interface

Improved site compatibility

Silent auto updates

Combined address and search bar

Enhanced Speed Dial

Stash

Discover

Off-Road mode

0 notes

loadingheart294 · 3 years

Text

Kofax Driver

E1025/E1035 KOFAX VRS Support. The E1025 and E1035 Scanners have been certified by KOFAX with the following VRS versions: VRS Elite 5.1.2 KOFAX Scanner Configurator.

83W or Less (Energy Saving Mode: 2.7W or Less) Suggested Daily Volume: 27,000Bundled Software ISIS/TWAIN Drivers Canon CapturePerfect 3.0KofaxNocson EasyConnect (available via download from the Nocson website)Other Features Ultrasonic double-Feed Detection Automatic Color Detection Automatic Page Size Detection Advanced Text Enhancement (Two Types)Skip Blank Page Staple Detection Prevent Bleed.

Kofax Driver Download

Kofax Drivers For Windows 10

Windows: ISIS/TWAIN Drivers; Canon CaptureOnTouch; CapturePerfect; Nuance eCopyPDF Pro Office; Kofax VRS Elite MAC: TWAIN Driver, Canon CaptureOnTouch Supported Operating Systems Windows 8.1 (32bit/64bit), Windows 10 (32bit/64bit), Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2, Microsoft Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Windows Server 2019, Mac OS 10.13, Mac. 4 Find your Kofax Adrenaline 650 device in the list and press double click on the scsiadapter device. Click Reinstall driver button. 5 Choose Install from the specific location and click on the Browse button. Click on the Next and Finish button after that to complete the installation process.

Category: Scanner Manufacturer: Kofax Caution Level: Intermediate Download File Size: Not Available Operating System: Windows 98/2000/ME/NT 4.0 Latest Version / Release Date: Not Available / 03 Dec 2009

Windows device driver information for Kofax Adrenaline 650 Ultra-Wide SCSI Adapter

Kofax Driver Download

The Kofax Adrenalin 650 Ultra-wide SCSI Adapter is an adapter card that is plugged into the computer to facilitate the work of scanners and produce high quality scanned images. It is referred to as an SCSI adapter as its interface is SCSI type. It was intended for document scanners and applies to a broad range from the departmental ones to high-end. Scanning of grayscale as well as color documents has been made more efficient as the scanner provides reliability and increases efficiency. Among its remarkable features is the ultra-wide controller with SCSI interface which gives 40Mbps throughput. The scanner also has a single board installation as well as the scanner driver. Kofax Adrenaline products are reliable and have been designed to ensure that the scanner users are able to do their work in a faster, much better and more efficient manner.

Kofax Drivers For Windows 10

Outdated Drivers?

Unless you update your drivers regularly you may face hardware performance issues.

To check your drivers you should manually verify every device on your system for driver updates

The Kofax Adrenalin 650 Ultra-wide SCSI Adapter is one among the Kofax adrenalin products which have a reputation of being reliable in their work. It supports other applications such as ImageControls, TWAIN and ISIS and its advantages include facilitating a singe board as well as scanner driver installation. Other advantages are a refined image processing that includes the removal of black borders, deshade, deskew, despeckle, line removal character repair among others. The product also has a superior recognition of bar codes among other advanced features of recognition such as recognition of patch code, page as well as form recognition. Kofax Adrenalin 650 Ultra-wide SCSI Adapters are highly compatible to other document scanners that have been produced by other companies such as Kodak, Ricoh, Panasonic, Canon, Hewlett- Packard and Bell & Howell. Users of this product will also benefit from unmatched technical support by skilled professionals. It is highly recommended you run a free registry scan for Windows and Kofax Adrenaline 650 Ultra-Wide SCSI Adapter errors before installing any driver updates.

Questions About Your Order

View your order status Redownload your software for free within 2 weeks of purchase date

30 Day Money Back Guarantee

Kofax offers a thirty-day money back guarantee for the purchase price on all retail products, beginning on date of purchase.

Mjs gadgets port devices driver download for windows 10. If you purchased your product online on Kofax.com, please click here for a refund request.

If you purchased your product from a retail location or other online retailer, contact Customer Service at 1-678-631-6202 for a Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) number for return. Proof of payment is required. Please allow 6-8 weeks for refund.

Our 90 Day Support Warranty

Kofax customers receive unlimited Technical Support access for the first 90 days of Product Ownership. Access is limited to problems or issues experienced during installation, setup, configuration, reinstallation (not including data recovery) and during normal usage.

Hardware configuration must meet the system requirements for the software. See the User’s Guide specific to the Kofax Desktop Software for system requirements. The 90-day Desktop Support Warranty is effective upon the earlier of product registration or activation.

Beyond 90 days, support is only available for current and one version prior to the current version software. Support is not provided for products more than one version behind the current version, or have reached end of life.

Download multiple frames film scanner vendor cameras. 1 Requires a TWAIN compatible flatbed scanner with transparency unit and film holders. Example scanners are the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mk II, Epson V600, Epson V550, Epson V370, plus others. 2 Requires a TWAIN compatible flatbed scanner that supports 48-bit output. 3 Requires a TWAIN compatible flatbed scanner that supports 16-bit output. Transfer data by using the WIA film scanner item (by using the folder acquisition feature). Only the WIA film scanner child items (that is, frames) are transferred to the application. Navigate to each frame item and transfer that WIA item. The driver normally performs the following operations when it uses the scanner's film scanning unit to scan.

Support during the first 90 days of Product Warranty is Free. Click here to view per-question rates beyond 90 days.

Driver Magician offers a professional solution for device drivers backup, restoration, update and removal in Windows operating system. It identifies all the hardware in the system, extracts their associated drivers from the hard disk and backs them up to a location of your choice. December 7th, 2020 Driver Magician Version 5.4 released: November 25th, 2019 Driver Magician Version 5.3 released: December 11th, 2018 Driver Magician Version 5.2 released: April 26th, 2017 Driver Magician Version 5.0 released: August 2nd, 2015 Driver Magician Version 4.7 released: November 20th, 2014 Driver Magician Version 4.5 released: Quick. Driver Magic is the best driver updater programmed to enhance the performance of your system in the most efficient manner. With an impressive 200000+ driver database, improve your gaming experience like never before. Let’s take a view of its key features: Your System Driver Updater. Drivermagic pro.

0 notes

thewebofslime · 5 years

Link

Edition:MalaysiaSingapore News Search Home Corporate Sections The Edge TV Others 新闻 EdgeProp.my TRENDING NOW 1MDB TH FGV 11 March 2019. Monday Select Language▼ CORPORATE FROM THE EDGE Edge Weekly Market shrugs off surprise resignation of Pos Malaysia CEO Ahmad Naqib Idris / The Edge Malaysia January 08, 2018 17:00 pm +08 This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on January 1, 2018 - January 07, 2018. -A+A THE market seems to have shrugged off the unexpected resignation of Pos Malaysia Bhd group CEO Datuk Mohd Shukrie Mohd Salleh, as the share price has rebounded from its recent decline. Citing his intention to make a career change, the company announced Shukrie’s resignation on Dec 11. In the same announcement, the company said Datuk Azlan Shahrim had been appointed as the covering group CEO until a suitable candidate is appointed. In a knee-jerk reaction, the share price declined 29 sen or 6% to close at RM5.10 on the day of the announcement, before touching a four-month low of RM5.07 on Dec 26. “It was a surprise to the market. Over the years, Shukrie has given a bit more clarity and guidance in terms of the direction of the company, which has improved Pos Malaysia’s share price. Previously, there was not much communication with the investment community,” says RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd analyst Michelle Foong. Shukrie joined Pos Malaysia as chief operating officer in July 2011, following DRB-Hicom Bhd’s acquisition of a 32.21% stake in the former from government investment arm Khazanah Nasional Bhd for a total of RM622.79 million. Prior to that, he served as the CEO of KL Airport Services Sdn Bhd (now Pos Aviation) and had previously filled several leadership positions in companies within the DRB-Hicom group. In November 2015, he was re-designated group CEO of Pos Malaysia and initiated a much-needed transformation. The group shifted towards the e-commerce space, with the acquisition of KL Airport Services, and its partnership with Lazada Group for the RM60 million e-commerce regional distribution centre in the Digital Free Trade Zone (DFTZ). The five-year SCORE 2.0 plan was initiated, aimed at developing the group’s e-commerce offerings while improving the revenue contribution from some of its existing postal and courier operations, as margins had declined since 2014. After Shukrie took the helm in November 2015, Pos Malaysia’s share price rose 46% to touch a four-year high of RM5.65 on May 1, 2018. While the counter saw a correction following the announcement of his departure, the market seems to have brushed off the development as the share price had rebounded to RM5.25 at the time of writing. RHB’s Foong says the news was a short-term negative, adding that the company’s fundamentals have not changed. She adds that the upcoming earnings announcement for the third financial quarter ended Dec 31, 2017 (3QFY2018), will have a greater bearing on the share price. “It really depends on how well the upcoming quarterly numbers perform. The third quarter is traditionally the strongest quarter for Pos Malaysia,” says Foong, adding that the company should remain fundamentally strong if it continues with the initiatives begun under Shukrie’s leadership. The group posted a strong set of results for 2QFY2018. Net profit jumped 179% to RM18.83 million year on year, boosted by the newly acquired logistics business and strong growth in the courier operations. Revenue for the quarter grew 49% y-o-y to RM587.16 million. For the first half of the financial year (1HFY2018), net profit increased 42% to RM54.75 million y-o-y, as revenue rose 48% to RM1.2 billion for the period. Similarly, Kenanga Investment Bank Bhd analyst Steven Chan says the company’s fundamentals remain intact and its earnings outlook remains positive. “Fundamentally, Pos Malaysia should be unchanged but we acknowledge the good performance the company has seen under Datuk Shukrie’s leadership,” he says. “The earnings outlook seems positive at this juncture, mostly contributed by its growing courier volumes due to e-commerce, coupled with the new inclusion of the logistics segment.” Chan adds that Pos Malaysia is one of the direct beneficiaries of the DFTZ, as it is the operator of the e-Fulfilment Hub, but notes that the postal services operations are expected to continue to be loss-making, due to the group’s inability to close down post offices. Macquarie Equities Research is positive on the company’s outlook going forward, with the highest target price among the research houses of RM7.30, offering a 39% upside to its close of RM5.25 on Dec 28. In comparison, RHB, Kenanga and Hong Leong Investment Bank Bhd have maintained target prices of RM6.30, RM5.10 and RM4.73 respectively. Macquarie says the appointment of Pos Malaysia for the first phase of DFTZ raises the possibility of the company being selected for the bigger second phase, which is expected to be ready in 2019. “This, coupled with reforms to make it a more efficient postal operator, underpins Pos Malaysia as our top pick in the Malaysia transport sector,” the research house writes in a recent note. Save by subscribing to us for your print and/or digital copy. P/S: The Edge is also available on Apple's AppStore and Androids' Google Play. We deliver news to your inbox daily RELATED NEWS 22 February 2018 Former Pos Malaysia CEO joins AirAsia's logistics arm 23 February 2018 Former Pos Malaysia CEO joins AirAsia’s logistics arm 11 December 2017 Azlan Shahrim appointed interim CEO of Pos Malaysia 11 December 2017 Pos Malaysia CEO Mohd Shukrie to step down FEATURED VIDEOS 08 Mar | 09:05pm Featured, Evening 5 EVENING 5: Petronas has good FY18 but bad quarter 08 Mar | 09:00pm Friday Takeaway, Featured FRIDAY TAKEAWAY: To Takaful or to travel? 08 Mar | 04:37pm Friday Takeaway, Featured On The Edge TV tonight 07 Mar | 09:05pm Featured, Evening 5 EVENING 5: Govt postpones soda tax 07 Mar | 09:00pm Upstart, Featured UPSTART: Broke. Betrayed. Reborn. 07 Mar | 03:14pm Upstart, Featured On The Edge TV over Astro Awani tonight 06 Mar | 09:25pm News, Featured NEWS: Mercedes-Benz Malaysia launches refreshed E-Class 06 Mar | 04:19pm Featured, News NEWS: Positioning investors ahead of the curve 06 Mar | 03:24pm Featured, JustSaying On The Edge TV tonight 05 Mar | 09:05pm Featured, Evening 5 EVENING 5: Khazanah slammed by impairments prevnext MOST READ MOST WATCHED 1 Former Sungai Siput MIC division chief lodges MACC report over land deal 2 Trump says China deal will mean 'very big spike' for markets 3 Johnson & Johnson to shut down Kedah plant 4 CIMB takes the next step forward 5 March 14 hearing of prosecution’s application to transfer Najib's 1MDB audit report tampering case e-Paper Desktop Reader Home About Us Join Us Contact Us Advertise with us Subscription Sitemap Term of use PDPA © All rights reserved. 2019. The Edge Communications Sdn. Bhd.

#TheWebOfSlime

0 notes

thrashermaxey · 6 years

Text

Cage Match: Tyler Seguin vs. Mark Scheifele

Just like two weeks ago I’m using the Fantasy Guide (available for order here) to help select this week’s battle, which is between Tyler Seguin and Mark Scheifele. The guide has them separated in scoring by just one point, but let’s delve more deeply into the numbers to see if one player has a wider advantage over the other for this season and/or down the road. Cage Match starts now!

Career Path and Contract Status

Seguin, 26, was selected second overall in 2010 after a 106-point OHL campaign. He went straight to the NHL, where he looked unimpressive in posting only 22 points in 74 games. But he made significant strides as a sophomore, more than tripling his points total to 67. His scoring pace fell a bit to 32 points in 48 games during the lockout-shortened 2012-13 campaign, and then, due at least in part of supposed off-ice issues, was dealt to Dallas in the offseason. There he paid immediate dividends in scoring 84 points in 80 games, marking the first of three consecutive point per game seasons in which each saw him tally 33+ goals and 40+ assists. He stumbled a bit in 2016-17, dropping to only 72 points but was back up to 78 last season.

Scheifele, 25, was drafted seventh overall in 2011, but unlike Seguin returned to play most of his age 18 and 19 seasons back in juniors, where he excelled to the tune of 142 total points in 92 games. Once with the Jets though, all Scheifele did up his scoring rate for three straight seasons, culminating in 82 points in 79 games in 2016-17. And although he once again met the point-per-game threshold in 2017-18, that came in only 60 games, marking his third season (of five) where he’s had injury issues, missing an average of 17 games in those campaigns.

This season is the last on Seguin’s six-year deal that carried with it a cap hit of $5.75M, while 2018-19 is the third for Scheifele on a deal that runs through 2023-24 and dings the cap at $6.125M per campaign.

Ice Time

Season

Total Ice Time per game

(rank among team’s forwards)

PP Ice Time per game

(rank among team’s forwards)

SH Ice Time per game

(rank among team’s forwards)

2017-18

20:55 (T.S.) – 1st

20:41 (M.S.) – 1st

3:09 (T.S.) – 2nd

3:07 (M.S.) – 2nd

1:33 (T.S.) – 4th

1:10 (M.S.) – 7th

2016-17

18:28 (T.S.) – 2nd

20:34 (M.S.) – 1st

3:10 (T.S.) – 2nd

3:06 (M.S.) – 1st

0:02 (T.S.) – 15th

0:42 (M.S.) – 9th

2015-16

19:27 (T.S.) – 2nd

18:33 (M.S.) – 4th

3:19 (T.S.) – 1st

2:41 (M.S.) – 5th

0:01 (T.S.) – 12th

0:18 (M.S.) – 11th

2015-16

19:33 (T.S.) – 2nd

18:35 (M.S.) – 5th

3:52 (T.S.) – 1st

2:25 (M.S.) – 5th

0:03 (T.S.) – 13th

0:30 (M.S.) – 10th

Sometimes the numbers make things simple, as is seemingly the case here with Scheifele, who saw his ice time rise by 2:00 in 2016-17 plus added power-play ice time, and responded with point-per-game output. Although some of that added time was syphoned away in the form of 0:28 of unproductive shorthanded duty in 2017-18, he still had deployment which, on paper, makes his point per game numbers seem legit.

As for Seguin, at first glance his 20:55 per game (7th best among all NHL forwards last season – Scheifele was 10th) looks superb; but roughly 60% of his newfound ice time was unproductive shorthanded duty. So in reality Seguin took the ice for a few non-shorthanded seconds less than Scheifele last season. Beyond that, last season was the lone one in which Ken Hitchcock was at the helm for Dallas, so it’s not clear whether new coach Jim Montgomery, who’s spoken of a more balanced offense, will opt to have Seguin play as many minutes. Of course in doing so Montgomery also might dial back Seguin’s shorthanded ice time, which could be a net positive. Moreover, it’s not like Seguin can’t produce top numbers with fewer minutes, as he’s done so several times. Long story short – Scheifele’s situation in Winnipeg is seemingly more ground in stone; however, should Seguin see less ice time it might not diminish his production, especially based on results from past seasons and if he sheds shorthanded duty along the way.

Secondary Categories

Season

PIMs

(per game)

Hits

(per game)

Blocked Shots (per game)

Shots

(per game)

PP Points

(per game)

2017-18

0.52 (T.S.)

0.30 (M.S.)

0.90 (T.S.)

0.95 (M.S.)

0.53 (T.S.)

0.51 (M.S.)

4.08 (T.S.)

2.08 (M.S.)

0.30 (T.S.)

0.26 (M.S.)

2016-17

0.27 (T.S.)

0.48 (M.S.)

0.73 (T.S.)

0.62 (M.S.)

0.31 (T.S.)

0.43 (M.S.)

3.67 (T.S.)

2.02 (M.S.)

0.35 (T.S.)

0.20 (M.S.)

2015-16

0.22 (T.S.)

0.67 (M.S.)

1.11 (T.S.)

0.74 (M.S.)

0.37 (T.S.)

0.50 (M.S.)

3.86 (T.S.)

2.73 (M.S.)

0.36 (T.S.)

0.15 (M.S.)

2014-15

0.28 (T.S.)

0.29 (M.S.)

0.88 (T.S.)

1.22 (M.S.)

0.36 (T.S.)

0.74 (M.S.)

3.94 (T.S.)

2.07 (M.S.)

0.41 (T.S.)

0.17 (M.S.)

Before he morphed into a scorer, Scheifele was very solid in hits and blocks; however, his combined production in those categories is now down by about 25%. With Seguin, the opposite has happened in that just a few seasons ago he was barely above one Hit+Block per game and now he’s neck and neck with Scheifele. PIM for Scheifele has been all over the map, while Seguin had a big enough jump last season – as compared to his prior three campaigns – that we have to doubt its sustainability.

As for the all-important SOG and PPPts areas, Seguin, simply put, is a monster. Even though in two of the last five seasons he missed 10 and 11 games, he still had 24+ PPPts in each, making him one of just four forwards to meet that criteria (the others being Alex Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom, Claude Giroux). Combine that with 275+ SOG per season and he and Ovechkin are the only two, with no other NHLer even having done it twice over the same five season period!

With Scheifele, we see a nice upward trend in PP scoring. He also showed he was capable of firing more pucks on net in 2015-16, with a 2.73 average; yet otherwise he has been consistently at two shots per game. The good news is both areas have realistic room to grow, even considerably; however, if Scheifele was going to be a high-volume shooter, chances are it would’ve already happened by now. As for PP scoring, the Jets ranked fifth last season in PP percentage and Scheifele was a staple on PP1, so circumstances existed for him to produce more on the PP than his one PPPt per every five games.

At age 25 and after 366 career NHL games, we have to wonder if Scheifele is capable of morphing into a higher volume shooter and/or a better producer on the power play. A higher shot total seems less likely, since of the 31 forwards who averaged 3+ SOG per game last season, none did so for the first time after age 25 and having already played more than four seasons in the NHL. But PPPts could be another story, since of the 23 players who tallied 25+ PPPts in 2017-18 there were two (Josh Bailey and Scheifele’s own teammate Blake Wheeler) who did so despite being older than Scheifele and having never previously posted 25 in a prior campaign. Therefore, even if Scheifele doesn’t raise his shot total, he could see scoring gains via more PPPts, even at his age.

Luck-Based Metrics

Season

Personal Shooting %

Team Shooting % (5×5)

Individual Points % (IPP)

Offensive Zone Starting % (5×5)

Average Shot Distance

Secondary Assists %

2017-18

11.9% (T.S.)

18.4% (M.S.)

9.19% (T.S.)

9.23% (M.S.)

63.4% (T.S.)

63.2% (M.S.)

47.1% (T.S.)

55.5% (M.S.)

30.6 (T.S.)

25.3 (M.S.)

31% (T.S.)

35% (M.S.)

2016-17

8.6% (T.S.)

20.0% (M.S.)

8.53% (T.S.)

11.69% (M.S.)

72.0% (T.S.)

68.3% (M.S.)

49.6% (T.S.)

52.7% (M.S.)

33.7 (T.S.)

22.9 (M.S.)

41% (T.S.)

48% (M.S.)

2015-16

11.9% (T.S.)

14.9% (M.S.)

9.42% (T.S.)

10.18% (M.S.)

65.8% (T.S.)

74.4% (M.S.)

56.2% (T.S.)

51.6% (M.S.)

32.4 (T.S.)

25.8 (M.S.)

35% (T.S.)

37% (M.S.)

2014-15

13.2% (T.S.)

8.8% (M.S.)

10.32% (T.S.)

8.67% (M.S.)

76.2% (T.S.)

60.5% (M.S.)

53.4% (T.S.)

48.3% (M.S.)

32.0 (T.S.)

26.4 (M.S.)

17% (T.S.)

56% (M.S.)

Both players have very high numbers for 5×5 team shooting percentage. Normally that’s a troublesome sign; however, they’ve exceeded the 9.0% threshold associated with scoring forwards so many times (including twice each in earlier seasons) and by so much, that the reasonable conclusion for one to draw is their presence on the ice beneficially – and consistently – leads to high volume scoring, making a strong case for each being an elite forward. From there, however, things differ.

In terms of IPP, Scheifele has one season above the 70% mark usually associated with top scorers and only two above 63%, whereas Seguin has only once been below the 63.4% he had last season and has been above 70% three times in the past five seasons. Clearly Seguin is either more focused on getting on the scoresheet as compared to Scheifele, or their playing styles differ to an extent that Seguin is more of a points magnet than Scheifele. As for the dip in Seguin’s IPP last season, that most likely came from playing with two very talented wingers for arguably the first time in his career, so they syphoned away some points he’d have otherwise had yet as a line they did well, as indicated by their Seguin’s 5×5 team shooting percentage, making the situation a net wash.

Meanwhile, Scheifele’s presence on his line led to an even higher team shooting percentage than Seguin last season, yet Scheifele’s IPP resulted in other players on the ice grabbing points that otherwise could have been his. And in fantasy, a sustainably elevated 5×5 team shooting percentage only great if it also translates into truly elite points production, and thus far his low IPPs have prevented, and could well continue to prevent, Scheifele from turning in a truly top level fantasy season.

Interestingly Seguin’s highest shot total among these four seasons came when he fired shots from the closest distance, meaning he wasn’t just shooting pucks willy nilly. And yet he also had a low secondary assists percentage for the third season out of these four, which means he’s both a scorer and playmaker, rather than someone who lucks into points. For what it’s worth, Scheifele is no slouch in these two areas either, but as noted above puts poolies who own him at a comparative disadvantage due to his far lower shot total than Seguin.

Who Wins?

Seguin in multi-cats because he gives poolies everything Scheifele does, plus more, which is enough to compensate for the added points Scheifele gets by playing on team that is poised to be an offensive powerhouse for many years. The reality is Scheifele is neither a true playmaker nor sniper; he does a little bit of everything, yet as a result doesn’t fit into the scoring picture enough to seemingly be able to take the next step into 85-90+ point territory, unless somehow he sees his PPPts scoring improve as has occurred with players older than him, but rarely.

In points only it’s closer; but I think I still like Seguin, who’ll have added motivation to succeed in order to help his UFA cause. That should put him in 85-point territory, which I believe will be above the point per game norm of Scheifele. Plus you get less injury risk.

Looking ahead, both players are holds in keeper leagues. On paper the Jets are stocked to be a great offensive team for many years, so it’s hard to see Scheifele doing any worse than point-per-game output. He would have had a chance at more if Blake Wheeler decided not to re-sign with the Jets after the coming season, which could have resulted in Scheifele doing more. But now that Wheeler has signed his extension, it should be more of the same for Scheifele. As for Seguin, if Dallas doesn’t extend him during the season, he’ll be every bit as hyped of a UFA as John Tavares was this summer, and could land on a team where he could do even better since Seguin has yet to play with both great linemates and for a high scoring team. If that occurs, he could hit the 90-point mark.

from All About Sports https://dobberhockey.com/hockey-home/cage-match/cage-match-tyler-seguin-vs-mark-scheifele/

0 notes

1nebest · 6 years

Link

The American South may not be the first region that comes to mind when you hear the phrase “hotbed of tech entrepreneurship,” but, slightly misguided perceptions aside, it’s home to a diverse and growing collection of startups.

Here, we’re going to take a deep dive into the startup funding data for the region.

What is “the South?”

Just like it’s a common pastime for many city dwellers to argue about the precise boundaries of neighborhoods, there’s often some disagreement about the exact contours of the U.S.’s various regions. To quash rabble-rousing from the get-go, we’re using the U.S. Census Bureau’s definition of “the South” on its official map of the United States. Below, we display a map of the states we’re going to look at today.

Much like barbecue, the South is not a monolithic concept. So to incorporate some regional flavor into the following analysis, we’re also going to use the same regional divisions that the U.S. Census Bureau uses.

By doing this, we’ll be able to get a better idea of the relative contribution states from each sub-region make to startup activity in the South overall.

The ebb and flow of deal and dollar volume

As is the case with most of the country, the South appears to be experiencing a shift in startup funding as we move toward the latter half of a bull run in entrepreneurial activity. The chart below shows a divergence in overall deal and dollar volume over time.

Much like in the rest of the U.S., reported deal and dollar volume are heading in different directions. Part of this may be due to reporting delays — it can sometimes take a few years for seed and early-stage rounds to get added to databases like Crunchbase’s. Nonetheless, there is a slow and generally upward creep in round sizes at most stages of funding. And that’s not just a Southern thing; it’s a country-wide trend.

Let’s disaggregate these figures a bit. We’ll start with deal counts and move on to dollar volume from there.

A closer look at southern venture deal and dollar volume

In the chart below, you’ll see venture deal volume broken out by sub-region.

Over the past several years, reported venture deal volume has been on the downswing. From a local maximum in 2014 through the end of 2017, it’s down almost 35 percent overall. But that’s not the whole picture. The relative share of deal volume has changed, as well.

Although it’s not immediately clear just by looking at the chart above, startups in the South Atlantic sub-region have accounted for an increasingly large share of the funding rounds. For example, in 2012, South Atlantic startups attracted 54 percent of the deal volume. In 2017, that grows to 64 percent. Startups in the West South Central sub-region have pretty consistently pulled in between 28 and 30 percent of the deals, so where’s the loss coming from? Startups headquartered in Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama pulled in just 8 percent of deals in 2017, compared to 18 percent in 2012.

It’s a similar story with dollar volume.

In general, dollar volume follows the same pattern, albeit with a bit more variability. Regardless, startups in the South Atlantic sub-region are hoovering up an ever-larger share of venture dollars, and there’s little to indicate that trend will reverse itself any time soon.

Where are the regional hotspots for deal-making in the south?

Let’s see which states accounted for most of the deal volume. The chart below shows the geographic distribution of deal-making activity by startups in each Southern state from the beginning of 2017 through time of writing. It should come as no surprise that much of the activity is concentrated in states with higher populations.

And here’s the distribution of dollar volume among southern states.

Despite some variation in which states are at the top of the ranks, the share of deal and dollar volume raised by startups in the top three states is remarkably similar, coming in at between 52 and 53 percent for both metrics.

The top startup cities in the south

We started by looking at the South as a whole and then drilled into its sub regions and states. But there’s one layer deeper we can go here, and that’s to rank the top startup cities in the South.

In the interest of keeping our rankings fresh and timely, we’re covering activity from the past 15 months or so, from the start of 2017 through mid-March 2018. But before highlighting some of the more notable hubs, let’s take a look at the numbers.

In the chart below, you’ll find the top 10 metropolitan areas where Southern startups closed the most funding rounds.

The chart below shows reported dollar volume over the same period of time.

Much like we saw at the state level, the top five startup cities — ranked by both deal and dollar volume — are the same, although there’s some variation between where each one ranks. In order, the D.C., Austin and Atlanta metro areas rank in the top three for each metric, while Dallas and Raleigh, NC switch off between fourth and fifth place.

Startups capitalize on the nation’s capital

To be frank, Washington, D.C.’s top-shelf ranking was a bit of a surprise. It may be the fact that Austin, TX plays host to South By Southwest, a somewhat more relaxed culture and/or a preponderance of excellent breakfast taco and barbecue joints, but to many — ourselves included — the city feels like it would have a more active startup scene than the nation’s capital. But that’s not exactly the case. The D.C. metro area had more venture deal and dollar volume than Austin for seven out of the last 10 years, and startups based in the nation’s capital have raised more than twice as much money so far in 2018.

D.C.-area startups have recently raised some notable rounds. Just a couple of weeks prior to the time of writing, Viela Bio raised $250 million in a Series A round (in late February 2018) to continue funding research and testing of its treatments for severe inflammation and autoimmune diseases. And on the later-stage end of things, education technology company Everfi raised $190 million in a Series D round that had participation from Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos, former Alphabet executive Eric Schmidt and Medium CEO Ev Williams. Other D.C. companies, including Mapbox, Upside.com, Afiniti and ThreatQuotient, have all raised late-stage rounds within the past 15 months.

Startup ecosystems in Southern cities may pale in comparison to places like New York and San Francisco, but it wouldn’t be wise to discount the region entirely. A large number of interesting companies call the lower half of the Lower 48 home, and as the cost of living continues to rise on the east and west coasts, don’t be surprised if many current and would-be founders opt to stay down home in the South.

0 notes