#Engaging in that premise indicates that we accept the genocide of homophobic people (if we also accept that outside the queer community

[blorbosexterminator]

very sorry. but i read your post w/ the anon several times and i do not understand the response. nowhere in the post did the anon say that only queer palestinians mattered...?

Anon absolutely didn't. And that's why I specified that I was speaking on a more general term regarding the subject, rather than a response to something anon meant or didn't mean.

#It was a response to the whole premise of the argument. a lot of very well meaning people have been pointing to queer Palestinians #as a response to the pink-washing propaganda by the west and people who fall for it #and while that might be a good conversation for any other time #I reject the whole premise of it regarding the Palestinian genocide #because answering with “actually; queer palestianians exist and your bombs can't distinguish between the queer and the straight and the #homophobic“ as well meaning as it is it still falls for the premise of the argument that I wholly reject #because hidden in that statement (even if people don’t necessarily realize they're making) is the pre-assumption that otherwise genocide is #fine #Engaging in that premise indicates that we accept the genocide of homophobic people (if we also accept that outside the queer community #everyone is homophobic. which there is zero proof for ANYWAY) #get what I mean? engaging in it; even with the best-intentions; can very easily led you to accept presuppositions that remain #fascist and manical and genocidal and completely inhumane and amoral #it gets you to argue for someone's right to live based on their sexuality and/or their view of sexuality #it's abhorrent #anyway: if og anon reads is; I didn’t mean you nor was I implying you said something that you didn’t #the queer map site is great (thanks for sharing it). I'm only responding to the whole argument that has been going on for days