Pokemon Starter Appearance Analysis Answers
7C(Opinion Post)
001: Bulbasaur
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? Yes
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? No
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
002: Ivysaur
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? Yes
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? No
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
003: Venusaur
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? No
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? Yes
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
Does it's last evolution look similar to it's first evolution? Yes
Could you tell the last evolution and the first evolution were connected without the middle evolution? Yes
004: Charmander
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? Yes
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? No
Is it's design too simple? A little
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
005: Charmeleon
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? No
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? Yes
Is it's design too simple? A little
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? Yes (Charmander)
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
006: Charizard
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? No
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? Yes
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
Does it's last evolution look similar to it's first evolution? Yes
Could you tell the last evolution and the first evolution were connected without the middle evolution? Yes
007: Squirtle
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? Yes
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? No
Is it's design too simple? A little
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? A little
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
008: Wartortle
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? Yes
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? No
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? No
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
009: Blastoise
Can you tell it's type from it's design? Yes
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design? Yes
Could it's evolution pass for both genders? No
Looks too feminine? No
Looks too masculine? Yes
Is it's design too simple? No
Is it's design too complicated? No
Does it look too much like an animal? A little
Is it's design too cute? No
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon? No
Is it's design cheap/lazy? No
Does it's last evolution look similar to it's first evolution? Yes
Could you tell the last evolution and the first evolution were connected without the middle evolution? Yes
(Next generation starters will be evaluated in next post)
0 notes
Pokemon Starter Appearance Analysis Questions
⦁ Analysis Questions (Overall)
Does it's last evolution look similar to it's first evolution?
Could you tell the last evolution and the first evolution were connected without the middle evolution?
⦁ Analysis Questions (All Evolutions)
Can you tell it's type from it's design?
Is it's design too simple?
Is it's design too complicated?
Does it look to much like an animal?
Could it's evolution pass for both genders?
Looks too feminine?
Looks too masculine?
Is it's design too cute?
Does it look too much like a similar Pokemon?
Is it's design cheap/lazy?
Can you distinguish which evolution stage it is based on it's design?
(All questions will be answered in an opinion post later)
0 notes