carnageacorn

[carnageacorn]

TOP BOYS by @QUEERGARDEN

#♥️

[carnageacorn]

ELLA PURNELL as LUCY MACLEAN Fallout | 1.01: The End

#GIRL HOT

[carnageacorn]

Nothing like a trip to the uncanny valley to boost your mood

[carnageacorn]

misha collins after he came out as bisexual

[carnageacorn]

* songs picked from this list.

#i went with a change is gonna come……… #jams all around here.

[carnageacorn]

because im curious and similar polls got me thinking…

#tiny heist!!! #and then unsleeping city and then fantasy high

[carnageacorn]

bro shut up i’m trying to recall the details of my prophetic dream

[carnageacorn]

[carnageacorn]

[carnageacorn]

😂😂😂

[carnageacorn]

Follow for more ❤️

[carnageacorn]

An extraordinary Acheulean handaxe knapped around a fossil shell circa 500,000-300,000 years ago.

The maker appears to have deliberately flaked around the shell to preserve and place it in a central position. As a result this handaxe has been described as an early example of artistic thought.

From West Tofts, Norfolk.

Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Courtesy Alison Fisk

[carnageacorn]

Stephen Dunn, from “Mon Semblable”, Between Angels

[carnageacorn]

oh youre bisexial? name two of every thing

[carnageacorn]

“What makes a poem a poem, finally, is that it is unparaphrasable. There is no other way to say exactly this; it exists only in its own body of language, only in these words. I may try to explain it or represent it in other terms, but then some element of its life will always be missing. It’s the same with painting. All I can say of still life must finally fall short; I may inventory, weigh, suggest, but I cannot circumscribe; some element of mystery will always be left out. What is missing is, precisely, its poetry.”

— Mark Doty, from Still Life With Oysters and Lemon

[carnageacorn]

😭😭😭😭

[carnageacorn]

“I, too, feel the need to reread the books I have already read,“ a third reader says, “but at every rereading I seem to be reading a new book, for the first time. Is it I who keep changing and seeing new things of which I was not previously aware? Or is reading a construction that assumes form, assembling a great number of variables, and therefore something that cannot be repeated twice according to the same pattern? Every time I seek to relive the emotion of a previous reading, I experience different and unexpected impressions, and do not find again those of before. At certain moments it seems to me that between one reading and the next there is a progression: in the sense, for example, of penetrating further into the spirit of the text, or of increasing my critical detachment. At other moments, on the contrary, I seem to retain the memory of the readings of a single book one next to another, enthusiastic or cold or hostile, scattered in time without a perspective, without a thread that ties them together. The conclusion I have reached is that reading is an operation without object; or that its true object is itself. The book is an accessory aid, or even a pretext.”

— Italo Calvino, If on a Winter’s Night a Traveler

#deep frowning #words