bisexualnathanyoung

[bisexualnathanyoung]

sexual thrill at the mere prospect of cataloging things in a database

#when people ask me why I’m getting my masters in library and information science this is what I’ll say

[bisexualnathanyoung]

KATE SHARMA & ANTHONY BRIDGERTON BRIDGERTON 2x06 THE CHOICE (1/5)

[bisexualnathanyoung]

'There is nothing hard or aggressively masculine about them. Nothing to suggest sex.' 👀👀👀

Daily Mirror, 28 May 1964

[Transcript under cut]

A psychologist put the Beatles under his microscope yesterday...to find out what makes them tick with the girls.

His diagnosis may spark off screams of protest from the fans. For this, he says, in their secret: "There is nothing hard or aggressively masculine about them. Nothing to suggest sex."

And the psychologist, Dr Frederick Casson concludes that John, Paul, George and Ringo are just cuddlesome pets to their fans - objects for motherly rather than sexual feelings.

Why should this no-sex appeal strike such a response?

In an article in this month's Family Doctor magazine Dr Casson says that part of the answer is in the "cheerful, pleasant personality of the four boys."

He adds "They look young and unspoilt. Their hair and clothes are appealingly neat and clean. They hairstyle and their extremely youthful appearance creates an impression of sexual ambiguity."

Dr Casson goes on, "They seem essentially nice boys - the sort a young girl can safely dote upon. Their extreme youth appeals very much to young girls, even to nine year olds. Their informal boy-next-door manner makes it very easy for the girl to identify herself with the Beatles. They are unaffected, and relatively classless, with no pretensions - quite unlike the formidably glamorous grown-up stars of stage and screen and TV."

The doctor calls the screaming of girl fans "a very exaggerated form of giggles." And he says that the no-sex secret of this "mob ecstasy" may in the end cause the Beatles' downfall.

For he adds: "It is probable that, as they grow older, the Beatles will inevitably lose this strong appeal to very young girls."

#this is crazy #and hilarious

[bisexualnathanyoung]

me writing: i am a god and reality bends to my whims

me proofreading: im too stupid to be alive

[bisexualnathanyoung]

couples t-shirts (nathan forced simon to wear it)

[bisexualnathanyoung]

[bisexualnathanyoung]

"Don't you FUCKING touch her."

I imagine the most feral Lucien when his mate is in danger. I love how SJM has described Lucien during moments of his intensity. His hair glowing like it's molten fire, his russet eye glowing!!! Hnnnggg I need for this man to let loose. He's had so much stacked up against him, so PLEASE, let's see the heir of Day!!!

[bisexualnathanyoung]

Fright Night (2011)

[bisexualnathanyoung]

Well you see minors under 25 years old should not be allowed to get gender reassignment surgery because what if they go to the clinic but instead of giving them a normal penis the nurses mess up and give them the evil penis. That's irreversible

[bisexualnathanyoung]

kate sharma (bridgerton) | 2.04 "victory"

[bisexualnathanyoung]

Bridgerton (2020—) The Litte Mermaid (2023)

[bisexualnathanyoung]

thinking about the poll about canon vs non-canon ships that didn't define terms, and the current fandom focus on things "going canon," so i made up a scale.

this is NOT a question about whether canon matters to what you ship (or matters at all), just how to define the phrase "canon ship."

many ships start low on the scale and slow burn their way up, so vote for the point when you would have called them "canon." i agonized over the order (especially #4-6) for a day and a half, but i went with the order in which i think joe random with a nielsen ratings box and no tumblr account would notice/call something a romantic relationship.

#I thought it meant they were endgame #I forgot people ship people who haven’t even looked at each other

[bisexualnathanyoung]

“Food is just fuel” and “sex is just for procreation” mfers are people I can’t relate to.

[bisexualnathanyoung]

I was already obsessed with Hozier on the lowkey but during and after that show I’ve gone completely feral. I spent $120 on merch I’m allowed to have a hyperfixation moment. I’m just sad I might never see him again 😭. It was so good. I can’t words. There wasn’t any confetti or fireworks or nonsense, it was just a good fucking show. The vibes were immaculate. We were only seven rows from the pit, and I’ve never been that close at a concert for an artist that I love THAT much.

An ethereal being

(Obviously joke, don’t put people on a pedestal, but just AAAAAAAAAA)

[bisexualnathanyoung]

had an enlightening conversation recently

[bisexualnathanyoung]

We should all have the right to an afternoon nap. Siesta culture is calling to me.

[bisexualnathanyoung]

post oversharing clarity is on the top 3 for most humiliating experiences ever, and it's not in third place