#ss 302 sheets

[simplexsteel]

Supplier of Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes in Lucknow

Simplex Steels is one of the leading Manufacturer and Supplier of Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. Simplex Steels was founded in 2013, in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Our offers stainless steel products, encompassing sheets, plates, coils, pipes, tubes, bars, wires, rods, channels, flats, industrial flanges, and beyond. We specialize in providing high-grade ss pipes and tubes, engineered to meet the demanding needs of various industries. We manufacture our SS pipes and tubes from the finest quality steel, sourced from trusted suppliers. They are available in multiple grades such as 304, 316, and 410, each offering unique properties to suit different environmental conditions and operational requirements. Committed to sustainability, our ss pipes and tubes are not only durable and recyclable but also designed to optimize efficiency in various systems. Customers recognize our stainless steel products for their durability, corrosion resistance, and ability to withstand high temperatures, making them preferred choices for various applications. Specifications: Dimensions: ASTM A312, A358, ASME SA312, SA358 Grades: TP 201, 202, 301, 302, 304, 304L, 309, 310, 316, 316L, 316LN, 316Ti, 317L, 321, 347, 405, 409, 410, 420, 430, 440C, 904L, AL-6XN (N08367). Size: 3/4 NB to 24 NB x SCH 5 to SCH XXS. Thickness: 0.8 to 5 mm Types: Seamless Pipe, ERW Pipe, EFW Pipe, Welded Pipe, Fabricated Pipes, LSAW Pipes Form: Seamless Pipes, Round Pipes, Custom Pipes, “U” Shape, Hydraulic Pipes, ERW Pipe, EFW, Pipe, H-SAW Pipe, L-SAW Pipe, Square Pipe, Rectangular Pipe. Supplier of Stainless Steel Pipes and Tubes in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and including various locations Like Noida, Meerut, Kanpur Nagar, Agra, Lucknow, Gorakhpur, Prayagraj, Ghaziabad, Rampur, Saharanpur, Sambhal, Shahjahanpur, Sitapur, Sultanpur, Tehri, Varanasi, Ghaziabad, Ghazipur, Gonda, Gorakhpur, Hamirpur, Hardoi. For further details, please feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#SupplierofStainlessSteelPipesandTubesinLucknow

[luvanametal]

Stainless Steel Angle in Vadodara

Luvana Metal Corporation is a Manufacturer, Exporter, and Supplier of Stainless Steel Angle in Vadodara, Gujarat. Luvana Metal Corporation provides a wide range of stainless steel products, including coils, sheets, plates, bars, rods, wires, valves, pipes, fittings, channels, angles, butt weld fittings, flanges, and fasteners. These SS Angles are available in different sizes, lengths, dimensions, thicknesses, types, standards, and other specifications as per clients' requirements. We offer Stainless Steel Angles that are available in different sizes and dimensions by international market standards. We offer Stainless Steel Angles according to the requirements of the clients. These SS Angles Bars are available in various standards like ASTM, ASME, AISI, DIN, BS, EN IS, JIS & other international standards. Specification: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Length: 1 meter – 7 meters ( 4 feet to 24 feet Size: 24×1 mm to 150×50 mm Finish: 2B, HR, Matt PVC, No. 8 PVC Form: SS Angles, SS Channels, SS Flats Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic terrarium 255 We supply these stainless steel angles to various industries & applications like oil & gas, petrochemicals, power generation, pharmaceuticals industries, heat exchangers, condensers, pulp and paper industry, etc. Luvana Metal Corporation is a Manufacturer, Exporter, and Supplier of Stainless Steel Angle in Vadodara, Gujarat, India and various locations like Sankheda, Pavi-Jetpur, Dabhoi, Rangoli, Limbada, Nandesari, Makarpura, Vaghodia, Savli. For further details, please feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelAngleinVadodara

[meghmanimetal]

Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Tamil Nadu

Meghmani Metal Industries:   Meghmani Metal Industries Leading Manufacturer and Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Tamil Nadu, India. The company holds ISO 9001:2015 certification and specializes in providing high-quality stainless steel products. Meghmani Metal manufactures and supplies an extensive range of stainless steel products, including sheets, plates, angles, channels, flats, rounds, patta, patti, rods, industrial fittings, and SS fasteners. SS Rods adhere to Indian and International standards, such as ASME, ASTM, ANSI, AISI, ensuring meticulous craftsmanship. Technical Specifications:   Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 5 mm To 500 mm Size: from 2.00mm to 6.35mm (0.078″ to 0.25″) dia. Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication   Stainless Steel Grades:   AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255.  Service Coverage:   Meghmani Metal Industries Provide Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Tamil Nadu, Including Chidambaram, Arcot, Ariyalur, Chengalpattu, Chennai, Coimbatore, Cuddalore, Dharmapuri, Dindigul, Erode, Kallakurichi, Kanchipuram, Kanniyakumari, Karur, Krishnagiri, Madurai, Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam, Namakkal, Nilgiris, Perambalur, Pudukkottai, Rajapalayam, Ramanathapuram, Ranipet, Salem, Sivagangai, Tenkasi, Thanjavur, Theni, Thoothukudi, Tiruchirappalli, Tirunelveli, Tirupathur, Tiruppur, Tiruvallur, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvarur, Vellore, Viluppuram, Virudhunagar, Salem, Udhagamandalam.   For comprehensive details on our product catalog, feel free to reach out through the provided contact information. Read the full article

#Arcot #Ariyalur #Chengalpattu #Chennai #Chidambaram #Coimbatore #Cuddalore #Dharmapuri #Dindigul #Erode #Exporter #India #Kallakurichi #Kanchipuram #Kanniyakumari #Karur #Krishnagiri #Madurai #Manufacturer #ManufacturerofStainlessSteelRods #Mayiladuthurai #Nagapattinam #Namakkal #Nilgiris #Perambalur #Pudukkottai #Rajapalayam #Ramanathapuram #Ranipet #Salem

[krystalsteel]

Stainless Steel Flat Bar in Chennai

Krystal Steel is the leading Manufacturer, Exporter, and Supplier of Stainless-Steel Flat Bar in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. We are Specialized in SS Sheets, Plates, Coils, Fasteners, Pipes, Tubes, Bars, Wires, Rods, Strip Coils, Flanges, Fittings, Angles, Channels, Flats, Industrial Valves. Our products comply with industry standards including ASTM, ASME, AISI, DIN, BS, EN, IS, and JIS, ensuring exceptional quality. Our comprehensive range includes stainless steel in welded and seamless forms, as well as carbon steel, nickel, and alloy angles, channels, and flat bars. We offer these stainless steel products in various material grades, forms, types, and specifications, showcasing our dedication to delivering high-quality products at competitive prices. Features: Available in all sizes Made from high-grade material Ready stock for immediate delivery Export packing ensures secure shipment. Technical Specification: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Length: 1 meter – 7 meters ( 4 feet to 24 feet Size: 24×1 mm to 150×50 mm Finish: 2B, HR, Matt PVC, No. 8 PVC Form: SS Angles, SS Channels, SS Flats Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, polishing, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic terrarium 255 Carbon Steel: ASTM A105 / ASME SA105, ASTM A350 LF2, LTCS. Alloy Steel: AISI 4130, 4140, 4142, 4145, 4150, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4350, 4620, 4820, 6150, 8620, 8630, 8822, 9310, 52100, HY80, HY100, 9315, 300M, Nitralloy 135M, 17-22A, 42CrMoA, EN19, SAE 4140, EN24 Krystal Steel is a Manufacturer and Supplier of Stainless-Steel Flat Bars in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India catering to locations like Chengalpattu, Chennai, Kancheepuram, Tiruvallur, Coimbatore, Erode, Karur, Krishnagiri, Namakkal, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruppur. For further details, please feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelFlatBarinChennai

[stirlingmoss]

2014 Camaro Z/28

Chevrolet introduced the restyled 2014 Camaro line at the New York Auto Show, including the return of the Z/28, the most iconic model in Camaro history.

The 2014 Camaro models feature a revised exterior design that integrates high-performance aerodynamics for more efficient cooling and stability at high speeds. The new Camaro Z/28 also features a full aerodynamics package that creates downforce at speed, which helps make it the most track-capable offering in Camaro’s history.

“As the ultimate track-capable Camaro, this car restores the mission of the original Z/28, and serves as a testament to the expertise of Chevrolet as the best-selling brand of performance cars,” said Mark Reuss, president, GM North America. “The build sheet is the wish list of any racer: lightweight, high-revving, dry-sump LS7 engine; carbon-ceramic brakes; integrated coolers for track use; true aerodynamic downforce, and a significant reduction in curb weight. This car could only come from Chevrolet, and could only be called the Z/28.”

The first Camaro Z/28 was introduced in 1967, created to compete in the Sports Car Club of America's Trans-Am 2 class. It featured a smaller, lighter, 302-cubic-inch V-8 for improved weight balance, as well as quick-ratio steering and a heavy-duty suspension for track use. In keeping with its road-racing focus, the 1967 Camaro Z/28 was not available with an automatic transmission or air conditioning.

While the new Camaro Z/28 is not intended to compete in a specific race series, it is solely focused on track capability. In initial testing, the Camaro Z/28 is three seconds faster per lap than the Camaro ZL1. That extra speed comes from three areas:

Increased grip: The Z/28 is capable of 1.05 g in cornering acceleration, due to comprehensive chassis revisions

Increased stopping power: the Z/28 features Brembo carbon-ceramic brakes capable of 1.5 g in deceleration, and consistent brake feel, lap after lap

Reduced curb weight: The naturally aspirated Z/28 weighs 300 pounds less than the supercharged Camaro ZL1, with changes ranging from lightweight wheels to thinner rear-window glass

Like the original, the 2014 Camaro Z/28 is offered only with a manual transmission. In a nod to modern convenience, air-conditioning is available, but only as an option.

"We set out to make the fastest road-racing Camaro possible that was still street-legal,” said Al Oppenheiser, Camaro chief engineer. “While the Camaro ZL1 offers exceptional performance on the street, the drag strip, and the track, the Z/28 is entirely focused on the track performance. The Z/28 will be too track-focused for most drivers, but offers road-racers one of the most capable track cars ever offered from an automaker.”

The new 2014 Camaro line will arrive at Chevrolet dealers later in 2013. The Camaro Z/28 is expected to be appearing at track events across the United States in spring 2014.

High-performance aerodynamics highlight changes for 2014 Camaro

The 2014 Camaro represents the most significant redesign since the introduction of the fifth-generation Camaro as a concept car in 2006.

“The 2014 Camaro is our opportunity to apply what we have learned listening to our customers, and our continuing development of high-performance models,” said Tom Peters, Camaro exterior design director. “We look for solutions that are both functional and beautiful so that the result is genuine Chevrolet – simple, powerful, honest, and more than expected.”

Compared to the previous model, the design represents a strong visual change front and rear, resulting in a wider, lower, more contemporary appearance. The front fascia features a wider lower opening, and a narrower upper opening that also updates the appearance of the iconic “halo ring” HID headlamps on the Camaro RS package. The functional hood vent on the Camaro SS helps reduce heat and aerodynamic lift. Moving to the rear, the sculptural decklid, horizontal lamps and diffuser complete the powerful statement.

The Camaro Z/28 also features a full aerodynamic package designed to produce downforce at track speeds. At the front, the Z/28 features a large splitter, connected to an underbody panel that further reduces lift. In profile, the Z/28 features fender flares over the front and rear wheels, as well as extended rocker panels that contribute to aerodynamic stability. An aggressive rear spoiler and functional diffuser complete the aerodynamic package.

On the interior, the Camaro Z/28 features trim in a distinctive, matte-metallic finish named Octane, the ZL1 flat-bottomed steering wheel, and standard Recaro seats with microfiber suede inserts. The new seats (also available on the coupe versions of the SS and ZL1 models), feature aggressive bolsters for high-performance driving, as well as seat cutouts inspired by the five-point harnesses found on racing seats. To save weight, both front seats incorporate manual adjustment.

The rear seats of the Z/28 have also been modified for weight reduction. A total of nine pounds (four kilograms) was saved by eliminating the seat-back pass through, as well as using high-density foam in place of the rigid structure of the seat back and steel mesh of the seat bottom.

“Unlike the Ford Mustang Boss 302, we felt it was important to keep the 2+2 configuration of the Camaro Z/28 as Chevrolet already has a world-class two-seat sports car in the Corvette,” said Oppenheiser. “By modifying the construction of the rear seat, we were able to reduce the overall weight of the Z/28 while still preserving the flexibility of 2+2 seating.”

7.0L, LS7 the heart of the Camaro Z/28’s track-capable performance

Like the original, the new Camaro Z/28 forgoes ultimate horsepower and torque for improved weight balance and track performance.

In 1967, the most-powerful engine available in a factory Camaro was a 396 cid V-8 with 375 horsepower. To prepare the Camaro Z/28 for road racing, engineers specified a lighter, 302 cid V-8, officially rated at 290 horsepower. While the 302 was not the choice for drag racers, it proved ideal for sports-car racing.

Today, the most-powerful engine offered is the Camaro ZL1’s supercharged 6.2L LSA, which delivers 580 horsepower. The heart of the 2014 Camaro Z/28 is the lighter, naturally aspirated 7.0L LS7 first introduced in the Corvette Z06.

“The LS7 is ideal for road racing because it delivers amazing performance in a compact, lightweight package,” said Jordan Lee, Small Block chief engineer and program manager. “The broad torque curve and high redline of the LS7 mean fewer shifts are required for each lap, while the lightweight design improves the front-to-rear weight balance for better handling.”

Co-developed with Corvette Racing, the hand-assembled 7.0L (427 cid) V-8 uses a number of high-performance components, including:

Titanium intake valves and connecting rods, and sodium-filled exhaust valves

CNC-ported aluminum cylinder heads

Forged-steel crankshaft and main bearing caps

High-lift camshaft

Hydroformed exhaust headers

11.0:1 compression ratio, and a 7,000 rpm redline.

10.5-quart, dry-sump oiling system

For the Camaro Z/28, the LS7 features unique induction and exhaust systems, and delivers at least 500 horsepower (373 kW) and 470 lb-ft of torque (637 Nm).

The racing-style, cold-air induction system and large K&N air filter provide maximum air flow.

The standard dual mode exhaust system and larger-diameter pipes enable improved air flow. By bypassing the mufflers during acceleration, the system increases both the torque and sound generated by the LS7 engine.

The Camaro Z/28 is exclusively offered with a Tremec TR6060 manual transmission. The six-speed features close-ratio gearing and 3.91:1 final drive ratio, both optimized for the power characteristics of the LS7.

Power is distributed to the rear wheels via a limited-slip differential featuring a helical gear set, rather than traditional clutch packs. The new design enables the driver to apply more power and get through corners faster, by continuously adjusting the torque bias to maximize available traction.

The differential works in unison with Chevrolet’s proprietary Performance Traction Management system, which allows drivers to adjust the level of throttle and brake intervention to match their capability and driving environment.

Unlike some competitors’ “track package” offerings, the Camaro Z/28 makes standard all the cooling systems required for track use. This includes the dry-sump oiling system for the LS7, which is connected to an integral liquid-to-liquid cooling system for engine oil.

A second liquid-to-liquid system provides cooling for the transmission and differential. This system pumps overcooled transmission fluid to a heat exchanger in the rear differential before traveling to the transmission. This reduces differential temperatures as much as 100 degrees F.

Camaro Z/28 chassis delivers 1.05 g in cornering grip

The singular focus of the Camaro Z/28 is most evident in the chassis, where the most has been made of every component for track use, from the ultra-high performance tires to race-proven dampers.

“We used the very best components in the industry to deliver uncompromised performance, lap after lap,” said Mark Stielow, Camaro Z/28 engineering manager. “We made nearly 200 changes to improve the track performance, which cumulatively make the Z/28 capable of 1.05 g in cornering. For perspective, with all other things, equal increasing maximum grip from 1 to 1.05 g can cut up to four seconds per lap.”

The Camaro Z/28 is the one of the first production cars fitted with race-proven, spool-valve dampers. Compared to a conventional damper that offers only two-way tuning for bump and rebound, a spool-valve damper allows four-way adjustment to precisely tune both bump and rebound settings for high-speed and low-speed wheel motions. The wider tuning range allowed engineers to dramatically increase the damper stiffness on the Camaro Z/28 without a significant change in ride quality. Additional chassis changes include stiffer string rates and suspension bushings for improved cornering response.

The Camaro Z/28 features 19-inch diameter wheels and tires, which reduce unsprung weight by 42 pounds (19 kilograms) per car compared to the 20-inch wheels standard on Camaro SS and ZL1. In addition, the smaller diameter wheels lower the center of gravity by 33 millimeters, further improving handling.

At all four corners, the lightweight, forged aluminum wheels are wrapped in massive 305/30ZR19 tires. This is the first production application of ultra-high performance Pirelli PZero Trofeo R tires, and believed to be the widest front tire on any production car.

To fully exploit the grip of the Pirelli tires, the Camaro Z/28 also features Brembo Carbon Ceramic Matrix™ rotors and fixed, monoblock calipers. The large 394 x 36 mm front rotors are paired with six-piston calipers, while the 390 x 32 mm rear rotors are paired four-piston calipers. Compared to similar-size, two-piece steel rotors, the lightweight carbon discs save 28 pounds (12.5 kilograms) per car.

The combination of tire grip and braking power enable the Camaro Z/28 to achieve up to 1.5 g in deceleration. With standard front brake cooling ducts, the Z/28 is also capable of continuous track use unmatched brake feel, lap after lap.

“What makes the Z/28 so addictive is it inspires confidence through every section on the track,” said Stielow. “The incredible, balanced performance helps you carry much more speed through every corner: the brakes are so good you can adjust your braking points later and later; the grip and suspension damping allows you to carry more speed through the apex; and then the limited slip allows you to make the most of the LS7 as you power out of the corner.”

Extensive lightweighting saved 300 pounds over the Camaro ZL1

To optimize the track performance of the Camaro Z/28, the engineering team subjected it to an intensive lightweighting program, saving 100 pounds (45 kilograms) compared to the naturally aspirated Camaro SS and 300 pounds (136 kilograms) to the supercharged Camaro ZL1.

“We looked at every subsystem for opportunities to save weight,” said Oppenheiser. “Our goal was to get rid of everything that didn’t make the car faster, and keep only what was required by law. For example, we wanted to eliminate the audio system completely, but we had to keep a single speaker for the seat-belt chime to meet safety requirements.”

Other examples of weight savings include:

Eliminated the tire-inflator kit, except for Rhode Island and New Hampshire, where it is required by law

Removed interior sound deadener, and carpeting from the trunk

Replaced the standard LN4 battery with a smaller, lightweight, LN3 battery

Specified thinner, 3.2-mm glass for the rear window, compared to 3.5-mm glass on the standard Camaro

HID headlamps and foglights are not available

Air conditioning is only available as a stand-alone option

“The team was so fanatical about saving weight, we even stripped the unused wiring out of the harness when we eliminated the fog lights, speakers, and air conditioning,” said Oppenheiser. “Every ounce saved contributed to making this the most track-capable Camaro we have ever built, and a worthy successor to the Z/28 name.”

(Chevrolet Press Release)

[blogsureshus]

A name plate is known as signage that tells about who/what about are? maybe it a name and designation, address, reception, canteen, etc.

Click here to get the price per unit name plate instant

Usually, a name plate is made of acrylic, wooden, brass metal, silver metal, aluminum composite panel, printing application could be a UV printing, engraving, laser marking, etc.

These all types of material can be made on the nominal price by printing on vinyl and paste on sun board used on the office table or on the gate on residence having concern person name and address etc.

Pull & Push, Exit, Entrance, She Toilet, He Toilet, Waiting Hall, etc are nameplate are common that can be used in numbers of that help to understand easily to act upon.

The flat brass letter is cut through laser cut the way you shape and size.

The customized brass letter is molded with the size, thickness, and style you required any thickness, size, and shape by melting.

Quality SS Plate

Three are two types of SS plate standard quality

Code 302 SS Plate

Code 402 SS Plate

This plate thickness comes in the gauge of 18 if we talk about thickness 302 code. it would be approx 1 mm cost come 3.5 rs per square inch

Where code 402 is the best quality of SS plate cost comes Rs per square inch Rs. 6.5/- you can get in engraved /lase marking on it. as well given below.

Now there are available in the form of artificial like brass and ss, actually it is made of PVC and you can get it print through UV printing.

Name Badge

Basically, the badge is made a circle, oval, rectangle. School badge as monitor, head boy, head girl used like it.

Standard Size of Badge is 55 mm

These Standard size 2″x2″ badges comes Rs 12 t0 15 Rs depending quantity and quality etc.

Metal Name Badges

when it comes to make a name baches on metal plate like SS and Brass with info-graphic you need to make negative or positice or it is done lesar engraving on metals

Tin Badges Price 15/-

Required quantity badges 500 and above each price cost 15/- all stuff used tin material and  Rs 12/- Fron made of tin and back side plastic made.

Some plate is made of radiant stickers that glow itself when the light failed are used in hospitals, mall, corporate office where there is a huge gathering nameplate as Exit, Stairs etc.

Name Plate Making -Old Method

Earlier it was used to made through chemical known as die casting on the metal of handwritten on metal or wooden. As well as it was done manually so the chance of inaccuracy of design/letter become more as well as filling ink in the engraved area somewhere deeper or shallow got.

But signage technologies have been upgraded that can be made any kind of materials with best quality nameplate through laser engraving or Laser cut letter and adhere on the base sheet and fixed on the wall.

Unmatched Name Plate -New Method

To make a nameplate some unique for a company director or some other label using

laser engraving and filling ink as well as registered color, no chance to fade and remove over the years.

Direct print any stuff even metal or non-metal such as ” Brass, Stainless Steel, Wooden, Aluminium Composite Panel etc.” applying UV prints

Economical Name Plate

There are various types of substrate to make a nameplate on soundboard, acrylic, wooden,

Best Name Plate

How much does a brass name plate cost?

These brass plate thickness overall 2mm-2.5mm thickness, and complete with printing price comes 20-25 Rs. per square inch. price depends on the quality and number of color to be added.

Which one process is the best for the name plate making?

Different types of name plate required different process likewise, Laser Engraving, UV printing, Digital Printing, etc. but awesome laser engraving, where accuracy comes 99.9%

#Printing #Designing #Shivani Enterprises #Blog #Name Plate Printing #Blog Technique

[brandonnatali]

The Chevrolet Camaro: History, Buying Tips, Auctions, Photos, and More

Chevrolet Camaro Essential History

When Ford introduced the seminal Mustang in 1964, Chevrolet did not immediately identify it as a threat, dismissing it as old-fashioned and countering with a turbocharged version of the Corvair. But then Mustang sales caught fire, particularly with young buyers, and Chevy knew it had made a mistake. The division initiated a crash program to develop the Camaro.

Fortunately, Chevrolet had done some preliminary work on a small personal luxury car based on the Chevy II Nova. By piggybacking on the development of the 1968 Nova, Chevrolet was able to rush the Camaro into production in 1966 as a 1967 model. It immediately became the Mustang’s lead competitor, trailed by the closely-related Pontiac Firebird (also introduced in 1967), Plymouth Barracuda (1964, though not competitive until ‘67), AMC Javelin (1968), and latecomer Dodge Challenger (1970).

The first-generation Camaro, available as both a coupe and a convertible, had a classic blocky shape that has aged well. Engine choices included inline sixes of 230 and 250 cubic inch displacement (3.8 and 3.9 liters) and V-8s of 327, 350, and 396 cid (5.6, 5.0, 5.7, and 6.5 liters) with various carburetor configurations. Horsepower ranged from 140 to 325 hp. The chassis setup was typical of the time, with a coil-sprung A-arm front suspension and a leaf-sprung live rear axle, with the unitized body featuring a separate front subframe to provide the stiffness that the Nova architecture lacked. Chevrolet built the first-generation Camaro with minor styling changes through 1969, with the 307 (5.0L) V-8 replacing the 327 in the middle of that year.

Chevrolet offered option packages in place of trim levels. The RS was largely an appearance package with hidden headlights. SS models had a 350 or 396 V-8 and an upgraded suspension. The Z-28 was designed for SCCA Trans Am racing and had a 302 cid (4.9 liter) V-8, essentially a 327 with a 283 crankshaft. It was rated 290 hp but real-world numbers were said to be closer to 400. (Mark Donohue raced one, replacing his Mustang.)

General Motors policy prohibited installation of engines larger than 400 cid in smaller cars, but as several dealers (most notably Don Yenko) were swapping in 427 (7.0-liter) V-8s, Chevrolet offered 427-equipped Camaros in 1969 as a special order through the Central Office Production Order (COPO) system.

Chevrolet started developing the second-generation Camaro almost as soon as the ’67 went on sale, with the intention of building a car with world-class handling and styling. The complexity of its rounded sheet metal presented new engineering and production challenges, and Chevrolet delayed the introduction of the new car until Friday, February 13th, 1970. (This Camaro is often labeled as a “1970½”, though Chevrolet never used this designation.) The 230 cid six was gone, a victim of the new Camaro’s heavier weight, as was the 302, as Trans Am rules no longer required a 5-liter engine. The big-block 396 was enlarged to 402 cid (6.6 liter), though it retained its 396 badging, and other engine sizes carried over. This was the only generation of the Camaro not available as a convertible.

Chevrolet continued to offer Rally Sport (RS), Super Sport (SS), and Z-28 packages, the latter now powered by a 360-hp 350. Performance car sales were declining, and in 1973 Chevrolet dropped the big-block engine and replaced the RS with the Type LT, which stood for Luxury Touring.

The Camaro was restyled in 1974 to meet new Federal bumper standards. It was one of the few bumper designs of the era that looked handsome and well integrated, though it grew the Camaro’s length by 7 inches. The engine lineup was down to the 250 I-6 and the 350 V-8. By this time Chrysler and AMC’s pony cars had been discontinued and the Mustang had been downsized to the Pinto-based Mustang II. That left the Camaro (and Firebird) as the only domestic cars of their kind on the market, and sales rose rapidly through the end of the decade. A new 305 cid (5.0 liter) V-8 was added in 1976, and the Z28 was dropped for 1975 only to reappear in 1977.

The Camaro was restyled again in 1978, gaining body-color plastic bumpers and an optional T-top, and was sold in Sport Coupe, Type LT, Z28 and Rally Sport trims, with the Berlinetta replacing the LT for 1979. In 1980, a new 229 cid (3.8 liter) V-6 replaced the 250 straight six. After peaking in 1979, sales entered a swan dive, dropping 50% between 1979 and 1981.

Chevrolet unveiled the third-generation Camaro for the 1982 model year with clean, squared-off styling and three models: Sport Coupe, Berlinetta and Z28, the latter selected as MotorTrend’s 1982 Car of the Year. Engine choices were the 2.5-liter “Iron Duke” 4-cylinder (dropped after 1985), a 2.8-liter V-6, and a 5.0 liter (305 cid) V-8 with optional fuel injection. Once again, sales soared.

Chevrolet introduced the IROC-Z in 1985. In 1987 the convertible and the 5.7L (350 cid) V-8 returned, now with fuel injection and 225 hp. A facelifted model was introduced in 1991, when the IROC model was dropped as the International Race of Champions switched to Dodge Daytonas.

A new fourth-generation Camaro coupe made its debut for 1993. The new car had a heavily revised suspension, though it retained the live rear axle. Two models were offered, a base car with a 3.4 liter V-6 engine and the Z28 with a 275 hp “Gen II” 5.7-liter V-8. A convertible followed for 1994 and a Buick-sourced 3.8-liter V-6 replaced the 3.4 in 1996. For 1998, the Camaro got new front-end styling with aerodynamic headlights, and the Gen II 5.7 was replaced by the aluminum 5.7-liter (346 cid) V-8 from the new C5 Corvette. Sales dwindled, and after years of only minor changes, production was halted in the summer of 2002. The Camaro had come to an end—or so it was thought.

The success of Ford’s new-for-2005 Mustang led GM to reconsider the Camaro, and at the 2006 Detroit auto show it revealed a new concept that paid homage to the 1969 Camaro. Public reaction was overwhelmingly positive and GM announced that a production version was in the works. Development survived the economic downturn, GM’s bankruptcy, and the failure of Pontiac’s Holden-based GTO (with which the new car would share its underpinnings).

The fifth-generation Camaro cope debuted for the 2010 model year, once again with V-6 or V-8 power. The convertible appeared in 2011, followed in 2012 by the 580-hp supercharged ZL-1. The Camaro was facelifted in 2014, when the Z/28 package was re-introduced.

The sixth-generation Camaro was introduced as a 2016 model. Though similar in appearance, it was smaller, lighter, and more agile than the car it replaced. Engine choices included a 2.0 liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, making this the first four-cylinder Camaro in thirty years. 2017 saw the return of the supercharged ZL1 as well as the track-oriented 1LE and base LS models. Along with the turbo four, the Camaro offered a 3.6-liter V-6 and 6.2-liter V-8 in naturally aspirated and supercharged forms. Styling was refreshed in 2018, and the Camaro remains in production to this day.

Chevrolet Camaro Highlights

The Pontiac Firebird was mechanically similar to the Chevrolet Camaro, but in keeping with GM tradition—in the late 1960s, at least—the division used its own powertrains. The 230- and 250-cid sixes were similar to Chevy’s engines but had unique blocks and overhead camshafts. The 326 (5.3 liter), 350 and 400 (6.6L) V-8s were Pontiac designs. The second-generation Firebirds used Chevrolet sixes and began borrowing V-8s from Oldsmobile in 1977 and Chevrolet in 1978. It wasn’t until the 3rd generation (1982) that the Firebird adopted an all-“corporate” engine lineup.

The legendary Camaro was also the launching pad for a legendary engine: Chevy’s small-block 350 (5.7 liter) V-8. Designed as an emissions-friendly alternative to the 327, the 350 would become a GM mainstay for 30 years. It was phased out for cars (including the Camaro) after 1992, replaced by a “Generation II” engine of similar displacement, but GM used the Gen I 350 in trucks, vans, and cop cars through 1996.

GM president Ed Cole, looking to rein in runaway model proliferation at Chevrolet, wanted to use the upcoming bumper standards as an excuse to kill the Camaro in 1973. A group of enthusiasts inside the company teamed up with a small contingent of dealers, who travelled to Detroit and offered to buy the entire production run if GM kept the Camaro. The lobbying worked and the Camaro remained in production. The decision was the right one: Camaro sales soared in the mid-to-late ‘70s, peaking in 1979.

Just as Ford developed the Mustang II from the Pinto, there were rumors that Chevrolet would build a downsized Camaro based on the Vega. Chevrolet did indeed create such a car, but it was not a Camaro replacement. The Monza was marketed from 1975 through 1980.

The third-gen Camaro’s compound-curved rear window was the largest piece of automotive glass produced to date.

Chevrolet considered front-wheel-drive for both the third- and fourth-gen Camaros. The company stuck with rear-wheel drive for the third-gen, as the FWD architecture of the time would not support a V-8 engine. A front-drive Camaro project called GM-80 was well on its way for the fourth generation, but poor sales of the Ford Probe, itself a proposed front-drive replacement for the Mustang, led General Motors to drop the idea.

Chevrolet Camaro Buying Tips

Some Camaro models are very collectible (and very valuable), and when buying one of these cars it’s important to check the VIN, engine ID, and fender tags to verify the car’s originality. For particularly rare or valuable models, the car should be authenticated.

Camaros were often driven vigorously, so when buying a newer model, look for traditional signs of abuse: Body work, uneven tire repair, and damage to wheels or suspension components, among other things.

Many of the late 2nd-gen and early 3rd-gen Camaros used carburetors with complex emissions controls, which caused tuning and driving problems even when new. These cars are still subject to emissions requirements in some states that require original smog equipment to remain intact. Check your state’s emissions laws and consider either a pre-smog or fuel-injected car.

Chevrolet Camaro Articles on Automobile

2020 Chevrolet Camaro Has a Cheaper Way to Get Your V-8 Fix

New LT1 trim brings down the price threshold.

Pro Racer Andy Pilgrim Thrashes the Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE

For $50k and change, Chevrolet gives you one serious rocket.

One Week With: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE

Ford’s GT350 is on notice.

First Drive: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 1LE

A well-balanced performance variant with a palatable price.

2016 Chevrolet Camaro Review

Upping the ante in the pony car wars.

Chevrolet Camaro Recent Auctions

1969 Chevrolet Camaro w/ ’96 LT1 V8

2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS

1972 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS L48

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

Chevrolet Camaro Quick Facts

First year of production: 1966 (1967 model year)

Original price (base): $2,466

Production (US):

1st generation (1967-69): 842,731

2nd generation (1970-1981): 1,948,233

3rd generation (1982-1992): 1,509,499

4th generation (1993-2002): 600,926

5th generation (2009-2015): 559,953

6th generation (2016-2019): 239,873

Total production to date: 5,701,215

Best sales year: 1979 (282,571)

Worst sales year: 1990 (34,986)

Chevrolet Camaro FAQ

Is the Chevrolet Camaro a good car?

For the most part, yes. Modern Camaros are powerful, agile, and big fun to drive, and the early Camaros are among the most potent compact muscle cars made. Second-, third-, and fourth-generation Camaros are styling icons of their respective eras, though build quality in the late 70s and early 80s wasn’t always stellar.

What is the cheapest Camaro model?

For 2020, the entry-level Chevrolet Camaro 1LS Coupe equipped with the 2.0 liter EcoBoost engine and manual transmission. It lists for $25,995 including destination charge.

What does the 2020 Camaro look like?

The 2020 Camaro looks a lot like the 2018 and 2019 Camaro, though SS models get some minor changes to the grille and front fascia.

Are Mustangs faster than Camaros?

Our sister publication, MotorTrend, has clocked the Ford Mustang GT500 to 60 in 3.7 seconds, 0.2 seconds slower than the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1. The 6.2-liter Camaro SS is about a quarter-second quicker to 60 mph than the 5.0-liter Mustang GT.

Are Camaros good on gas?

They aren’t great. As of 2020, the four-cylinder Camaro has an EPA combined estimate of 25 mpg with an automatic transmission and 23 mpg with a manual. The V-6 is rated at 20 mpg, and the V-8s at 19-20 mpg. The supercharged Camaro ZL1 is EPA rated at 16 mpg combined.

The post The Chevrolet Camaro: History, Buying Tips, Auctions, Photos, and More appeared first on Automobile Magazine.

The Chevrolet Camaro: History, Buying Tips, Auctions, Photos, and More published first on https://kwsseuren.tumblr.com/

[bharatiyamedia-blog]

Clamour grows for capital punishment; NCW chief says J&Ok govt ought to method greater courtroom

http://tinyurl.com/yyuu289p Kathua rape and homicide case verdict LATEST updates: Reacting to the quantum of punishment within the Kathur rape and homicide case, NCW chairperson Rekha Sharma mentioned that she was anticipating capital punishment for the convicts. She tweeted that the Jammu and Kashmir authorities ought to method greater courtroom within the matter.   Deepak Khajuria, Sanji Ram and one other accused have been given life imprisonment of 25 years within the Kathua rape and homicide case. The quantum of punishment is more likely to be pronounced at four pm, studies mentioned. Nationwide Fee for Ladies’s Rekha Sharma known as for capital punishment for the perpetrators who had been discovered responsible by the Pathankot courtroom on Monday. One of many prosecution legal professionals, Mubeen Farooq, additionally mentioned that they’d pursue capital punishment for the responsible. Quickly after the decision was declared by the Pathankot courtroom within the Kathua case on Monday, studies mentioned that the quantum of punishment for the six convicts can even be declared by the courtroom at 2 pm on Monday. The sufferer’s household’s former defence lawyer Deepika Rajawat was jubilant concerning the Pathankot courtroom’s conviction of the six accused within the case. She was quoted by CNN-News18 as saying, “It’s a giant day and a victory for all of us. We should salute the crime department for conducting the investigations in an expert method.” PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti, who was the chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir on the time of the rape and homicide of the eight-year-old woman in Kathua, welcomed the conviction of the accused on Monday. The case was a bone of competition between the PDP and BJP, who had been a part of a coalition authorities on the time. Former chief minister Omar Abdullah lauded the conviction of six of the accused within the Kathua rape and homicide case. He mentioned that the responsible folks ought to obtain the “most extreme” punishment.  Six accused, together with three cops, held responsible in Kathua rape and homicide case. Son of principal accused Sanjhi Ram has been given good thing about doubt within the case. Trial of a juvenile shall be held individually. The quantum of punishment shall be pronounced lat 2 pm on Monday. Six out of the seven accused have been convicted beneath three Sections of the IPC, whereas the juvenile Vishal has been acquitted of all prices. Studies additionally mentioned that the quantum of punishment shall be pronounced at 2 pm on Monday. A number of studies have mentioned that 5 out of seven accused have been convicted the Pathankot particular courtroom decide. CNN-Information18 additionally reported that the primary accused, Sanjhi Ram, and Tilak Dutta have been convicted. Nonetheless, the judgment remains to be being learn out. The seven out of eight accused have been summoned contained in the courtroom within the Pathankot courtroom in keeping with protocol of the In-camera trial. Anti-riot autos have additionally been deployed exterior the courtroom. Seven out of eight accused — eighth is a juvenile — have been dropped at the Pathankot courtroom forward of the listening to. Ankur Sharma, the defence lawyer for the accused, who visited the particular courtroom at Pathankot forward of the trial expressed confidence that the seven accused will get acquitted within the Kathua rape and homicide case. He additionally mentioned that a lot of the prosecution’s eyewitnesses had turned hostile in the course of the trial. The Punjab Police are usually not permitting anybody to enter the courtroom advanced in Pathankot with out verification, forward of the listening to within the controversial case of rape and homicide of a minor in Kathua final 12 months will begin quickly. Forward of the decision within the Kathua rape and homicide case, which is more likely to be pronounced on Monday at 10 am, particular safety preparations had been put in place across the particular courtroom in Punjab’s Pathankot, and in addition in Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir. The decision within the case of rape and homicide of an eight-year-old nomadic woman in Kathua in Jammu and Kashmir shall be delivered by a particular courtroom on Monday. The in-camera trial within the case that shook the nation ended on three June, when district and classes decide Tejwinder Singh had introduced that the decision was more likely to be delivered on 10 June. Elaborate safety preparations have been made in and across the courtroom and in Kathua in view of the pronouncement of the judgement, officers mentioned Sunday. The scenario shall be monitored intently, they mentioned. In accordance with the 15-page cost sheet, the eight-year-old woman, who was kidnapped on 10 January final 12 months, was allegedly raped in captivity in a small village temple in Kathua district after having been saved sedated for 4 days earlier than she was bludgeoned to demise. Safety deployed exterior the Pathankot courtroom on Monday. 101 reporters The day-to-day trial commenced within the first week of June final 12 months on the district and classes courtroom in Pathankot in neighbouring state of Punjab, about 100 kilometres from Jammu and 30 kilometres from Kathua, after the Supreme Court docket ordered that the case be shifted out of Jammu and Kashmir. The apex courtroom order got here after legal professionals in Kathua prevented Crime Department officers from submitting a cost sheet within the sensational case, which shocked the nation. The prosecution staff within the case comprised JK Chopra, SS Basra and Harminder Singh. The Crime Department arrested village head Sanji Ram, his son Vishal, juvenile nephew and his buddy Anand Dutta, and two particular law enforcement officials Deepak Khajuria and Surender Verma. Head constable Tilak Raj and sub-inspector Anand Dutta, who allegedly took Rs four lakh from Sanji Ram and destroyed essential proof, had been additionally arrested. Expenses of rape and homicide had been framed by the district and classes decide towards seven out of the eight accused. The trial towards the juvenile is but to start as his petition on figuring out his age is to be heard by the Jammu and Kashmir Excessive Court docket. The courtroom framed prices beneath the Ranbir Penal Code(RPC), together with Sections 120-B (felony conspiracy), 302 (homicide) and 376-D (gang-rape), in keeping with the prosecution. The accused, if convicted, face minimal life imprisonment and most demise penalty. The courtroom additionally framed prices of destruction of proof and inflicting harm by poisoning beneath Part 328 of the RPC. The 2 policemen — Raj and Datta — had been additionally charged beneath Part 161 (public servant taking unlawful gratification) of the RPC. All of the accused, barring the juvenile, had been shifted to Gurdaspur jail following an intervention by the Supreme Court docket which additionally restricted look of the defence legal professionals and restricted it to at least one or most of two per accused. The chargesheet mentioned the woman had gone lacking whereas grazing horses. Investigators mentioned the accused juvenile had kidnapped the woman beneath the pretext of serving to her discover her horses. The kidnapping, rape and killing of the kid was a part of a fastidiously deliberate technique to take away the minority nomadic group from the world, it mentioned. The case had change into a bone of competition between the then ruling alliance companions PDP and the BJP after two ministers of the saffron occasion, Chowdhury Lal Singh and Chander Prakash Ganga, participated in a rally organised by the Hindu Ekta Manch in assist of the accused arrested by the state crime department. Your information to the most recent cricket World Cup tales, evaluation, studies, opinions, stay updates and scores on https://www.firstpost.com/firstcricket/series/icc-cricket-world-cup-2019.html. Comply with us on Twitter and Instagram or like our Facebook web page for updates all through the continued occasion in England and Wales. !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '259288058299626'); fbq('track', 'PageView'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_GB/all.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.9&appId=1117108234997285"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); window.fbAsyncInit = function () { FB.init({appId: '1117108234997285', version: 2.4, xfbml: true}); // *** here is my code *** if (typeof facebookInit == 'function') { facebookInit(); } }; (function () { var e = document.createElement('script'); e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js'; e.async = true; document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e); }()); function facebookInit() { console.log('Found FB: Loading comments.'); FB.XFBML.parse(); } Source link

[simplexsteel]

Stainless Steel Round Bar in Kolkata

Simplex Steels is a Manufacturer, Exporter, and Supplier of Stainless-Steel Round bar in Kolkata, West Bengal. We Specialize in offering a wide range of stainless steel products, including SS Products and MS Products like SS Sheet, Plate, Coils, Pipes, Tubes, Bar, Wires, Rods, Angles, Channels, Flats, SS Fittings, Pipe, Tubes, Industrial Flanges, SS Fasteners, SS Dairy Valves. We provide a variety of stainless steel pipes and tubes customized to meet different requirements, siz-es, and standards. Our ISO certification emphasizes our commitment to delivering top-quality solutions. These round bars are offered in various sizes, adhering to EN, DIN, JIS, ASTM, BS, ASME, and AISI standards. Simplex Steel utilizes advanced technology in its manufacturing plants to produce Stainless Steel Round Bar products, ensuring accuracy and excellence. Features: Dimensional accuracy Durable Chemical resistance High strength Corrosion resistance Excellent finish Specification: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 5 mm To 500 mm Size: from 2.00mm to 6.35mm (0.078″ to 0.25″) dia. Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Anneling, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255 Simplex Steels is a Supplier of Stainless-Steel Round Bar in Kolkata, West Bengal including locations like Birbhum, Dakshin Dinajpur, Darjiling (Darjeeling), Haora (Howrah), Hugli (Hooghly), Jalpaiguri, Koch Bihar (Cooch Behar), Kolkata, Maldah, Murshidabad, Nadia, North Twenty Four Parganas, Paschim Medinipur, Purba Medinipur, Puruliya. For further information, feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelRoundBarinKolkata

[luvanametal]

Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Thane

Luvana Metal Corporation are Manufacturer, Exporter and Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Thane, Maharashtra.

Luvana Metal Corporation, an ISO 9001:2015 certified company, Ankleshwar and Pune, India.

Our extensive product line includes SS Coils, Sheets, Plates, Bars, Rods, Wires, Valves, Pipes, Fittings, Channels, Angles, Butt weld fittings, Flanges, and Fasteners.

Our SS Rods to Indian and International standards, such as ASME, ASTM, ANSI, AISI, ensuring meticulous craftsmanship.

With meticulous craftsmanship, we proudly stand as one of the market's most dependable stainless steel rod manufacturers.

Utilizing cutting-edge technology and rigorous quality checks, our rods meet the highest standards.

We provide customized solutions tailored to your specific needs. Trust us for all your stainless steel rod requirements.

Specifications:

Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 5 mm To 500 mm Size: from 2.00mm to 6.35mm (0.078″ to 0.25″) dia. Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255

Application:

Pharmaceuticals Petrochemicals Heavy Chemicals Electronics Automobiles Engineering Food Processing

We are Manufacturer, Exporter and Supplier of Stainless Steel Rods in Thane, Maharashtra and Including location like Nashik, Pune, Konkan, Nagpur, Aurangabad, Amravati, Nerul, Ghansoli, Pawne, Juinagar, Kharghar, Rabale, Turbhe, Sanpada, Vashi, Kopar Khairane.

For an in-depth exploration of our product catalog, feel free to connect with us through the provided contact information.

[postolo]

2019 SCC Vol. 4 April 21, 2019 Part 1

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 34 and 37 — Arbitrability of dispute: Limited grounds on which arbitral award may be interfered with, are (i) in exercise of jurisdiction under S. 34 the Court does not sit in appeal over the arbitral award and may interfere on merits only on the well-settled limited grounds, (ii) interference under S. 37 cannot travel beyond the restrictions laid down under S. 34, and (iii) in case an arbitral award has been confirmed by the Court under S. 34 and by the Court in an appeal under S. 37, Supreme Court must be extremely cautious and slow to disturb such concurrent findings. Further, while interpreting the terms of the contract, the conduct of parties and correspondences exchanged would be relevant factors and it is within the arbitrator’s jurisdiction to consider the same. [MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd., (2019) 4 SCC 163]

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 39 Rr. 1 and 2 — Temporary injunction — Dismissal of application — When justified: In this case, respondents were seeking temporary injunction to restrain State Electricity Board from interfering with their alleged possession over suit land, for construction of electricity sub-station thereon by Board. Respondents failed to make out prima facie case to justify grant of interim injunction. Respondents also failed to specify area in their alleged possession on which Board proceeded to set up sub-station. Balance of comparative convenience and hardship and public interest inclined in favour of Board for construction of power sub-station over land. In case respondents succeed in establishing their title and possession over any part of land utilised by sub-station they would be entitled to compensation under S. 67(3) of Electricity Act, 2003 or any other statutory provisions. It was held that temporary injunction rightly declined by court. [State of Jharkhand v. Surendra Kumar Srivastava, (2019) 4 SCC 214]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 456: Limitation of 30 days for restoration of possession of property is not applicable where trial court had already passed specific order for restoration, or in proceedings before appellate courts. 30 days’ limitation period is applicable where trial court does not pass order for restoration of possession at the time of convicting accused. [Mahesh Dube v. Shivbodh, (2019) 4 SCC 160]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 482: Dissmisal of application of appellant-accused under S. 482, for setting aside charge-sheet under Ss. 420, 498-A, 323, 376 and 506 IPC and Ss. 3 and 4, DP Act, 1961, without application of mind to case, not proper. [Monu v. State of U.P., (2019) 4 SCC 140]

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Ss. 227, 245, 397 and 399 — Discharge application — Manner in which to be considered: While considering petition for discharge, courts cannot act as appellate court and start appreciating evidence by finding out inconsistencies in statements of witnesses. Consideration of record for discharge purpose is different from consideration of record while deciding appeal. [State v. J. Doraiswamy, (2019) 4 SCC 149]

Criminal Trial — Sentence — Minimum sentence/Minimum statutory sentence — Minimum sentence without discretion: Awarding sentence less than the minimum sentence, not permissible. [State of M.P. v. Vikram Das, (2019) 4 SCC 125]

Family and Personal Laws — Muslim Law — Irregular (fasid) marriage: Marriage between Muslim male and Hindu woman, irregular (fasid) and not void (batil). Word “fasid” synonymously regarded as invalid or irregular. Children born from such wedlock treated as legitimate and entitled to share in father’s property. [Mohd. Salim v. Shamsudeen, (2019) 4 SCC 130]

Forest Act, 1927 — Ss. 52 & 54 and 41 & 42 — Prosecution for offences under Forest Act — Non-production of seized wood and vehicle — Effect of: In this case appellants apprehended with vehicle carrying 22 logs of Khair wood without authorisation or permit, acquitted under S. 379 IPC and convicted under Forest Act for six months. The Supreme Court held, non-production of seized wood and vehicle, primary evidence of offence, renders prosecution case fragile and unsustainable. Mere production of seizure memo does not tantamount to production of seized woods and lorry. Unless seized wood was produced, mere production of a sample, and no material in support that sample was out of same 22 logs, conviction of appellants by High Court not sustainable. [Pawan Kumar v. State of H.P., (2019) 4 SCC 182]

Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 80-HH r/w S. 80-A (Ch. VI-A) and Ss. 32 & 32-AB (Ch. IV) — Deductions under Ch. VIA and those under Ch. IV — Distinguished: Ch. VI-A, is a stand-alone chapter dehors Ch. IV and provisions relating to various kinds of deductions mentioned in Ch. VI-A have to be construed independent of Ch. IV. Further, the purpose of deduction under Ch. IV is to arrive at true income after making such expenditure admissible for deduction while deductions provided under Ch. VI-A, are largely in the nature of incentives. Further, conceptually “income or total income” is different from “profits and gains” and S. 80-A itself uses the expression “from his gross total income”. Also, different provisions from Ss. 80-C to 80-U, while mentioning the percentage at which and for which period a particular deduction is allowable, also specify as to how such a deduction is to be worked out, namely, specific percentage of deduction of which component. S. 80-HH r/w S. 80-A clearly signifies that a deduction under S. 80-HH has to be of gross profits and gains i.e. before computing the income as specified in Ss. 30 to 43-D. Also, the restrictive clause S. 80-AB, inserted w.e.f. 1-4-1981 being a provision made with prospective effect, cannot apply to Assessment Years 1979-1980 and 1980-1981. [Vijay Industries v. CIT, (2019) 4 SCC 184]

Infrastructure Laws — Energy and Power — Electricity Act, 2003 — Ss. 152 and 135 — Compounding of offences: In this case of initiation of prosecution for power theft and subsequent settlement between Electricity Company and consumer, while dismissing petition for quashment of prosecution for power theft, S. 152 was not considered. Hence, matter remanded to High Court for reconsideration of petition in light to S. 152 of Electricity Act, 2003. [Mukesh Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2019) 4 SCC 171]

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Ss. 7, 8 and 9 r/w Ss. 5(7), 5(8) and 5(20): Classification of creditors i.e. as financial and operational creditors, held, valid. Operational creditors are not discriminated against and Art. 14 of the Constitution has not been infracted either on the ground of equals being treated unequally or on the ground of manifest arbitrariness. Since equality is only among equals, no discrimination results if the Court can be shown that there is an intelligible differentia which separates two kinds of creditors so long as there is some rational relation between the creditors so differentiated, with the object sought to be achieved by the legislation. Financial creditors generally lend finance on a term loan or for working capital while operational creditors are relatable to supply of goods. Further, financial creditors are, from the very beginning, involved with assessing viability of corporate debtor and engage in restructuring of loan as well as reorganisation of corporate debtor’s business when there is financial stress, which operational creditors do not and cannot do. Further, they differ qua repayment schedule, security requirement for dues, contractual terms for giving credit, remedy in case of defaults and fora before which dispute resolution takes place. Further, financial debts made to banks and financial institutions are well documented and defaults made are easily verifiable. Also, generally the quantum of dues of operational creditors and the number of such creditors are comparatively less. Preserving the corporate debtor as a going concern, while ensuring maximum recovery for all creditors being the objective of the Code, financial creditors are different from operational creditors and therefore, there is an intelligible differentia between the two which has a direct relation to the objects sought to be achieved by the Code. [Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (2019) 4 SCC 17]

Kerala Abkari Act, 1077 ME (1 of 1077) — Ss. 8(2) and 63 — Sentence warranted — Imprisonment reduced: In this case search of house of appellant-accused, led to recovery of 4.5 litres of arrack and 3.750 litres of Indian made foreign liquor, from his possession. Trial court convicted him under Ss. 8(2) and 63, and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 year and fine of Rs 1,00,000 under S. 8(2), and fine of Rs 5000 under S. 63. High Court, while confirming conviction, modified sentence by reducing SI to 9 months, while maintaining sentence imposed under S. 63. Looking at gravity of offence and quantum of liquor seized during search, and as appellant was already in custody for 35 days, the Supreme Court reduced the imprisonment to the period already undergone. However, penalty amount imposed by trial court, as upheld by High Court, was confirmed. [Lalichan v. State of Kerala, (2019) 4 SCC 224]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — S. 139: This section raises presumption of law that cheque duly drawn was in discharge of debt or liability. However, presumption is rebuttable and onus lies on drawer to rebut it by adducing cogent evidence to the contrary. This presumption is not in conflict with human right of presumption of innocence of accused which prosecution is required to dislodge by proving its case against accused beyond reasonable doubt. [Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar, (2019) 4 SCC 197]

Penal Code, 1860 — S. 302 r/w S. 34: In this case of daylight murder, accused was named in FIR. There were eyewitnesses and there was neither any contradiction nor any inconsistency in their statements on material version such as on the question of identity of accused, who hit, where the assault was made and who fired. There was previous enmity between accused and deceased. A case of common intention under S. 34 IPC also stood fully made out against all the accused persons, hence, conviction was confirmed. [Madan Mohan Mahto v. State of Jharkhand, (2019) 4 SCC 142]

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 307/149 and Ss. 325/149, 147, 148, 451, 294/149 & 506/149: In this case charges were framed under all of the above sections by trial court. However, noticing nature of injuries sustained by appellant complainant, High Court quashed and set aside trial court’s order framing charge under S. 307. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had not committed any error in setting aside order passed by trial court insofar as framing charge under S. 307 is concerned. [Champa Lal Dhakar v. Naval Singh Rajput, (2019) 4 SCC 146]

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 376(2)(f) and 201: In this case of rape and murder of girl aged 7½ yrs, death sentence commuted to life imprisonment, in the facts and circumstances of the case, due to mitigating circumstances outweighing the aggravating circumstances. [Vijay Raikwar v. State of M.P., (2019) 4 SCC 210]

Police — Director General of Police (DGP) — Residual tenure: Incumbent to be selected as DGP should have a minimum residual tenure of six months (two years or more, preferable) and he should not be on verge of retirement. Minimum residual tenure of 6 months is reasonable and would ward off favouritism. Once appointed, incumbent should get a minimum tenure of two years of service irrespective of his date of superannuation. Selection should be on basis of merit. Above direction to hold field until validity of Police Acts in force is examined and dealt with by Court. [Prakash Singh v. Union of India, (2019) 4 SCC 1]

Police — Director General of Police (DGP) — Tenure and selection: All State Governments directed to scrupulously comply with the directions passed in Prakash Singh, (2006) 8 SCC 1 and approach Court in case of any grievance. Any legislation/rule running counter to directions issued herein shall remain in abeyance. [Prakash Singh v. Union of India, (2019) 4 SCC 13]

Police — Director General of Police (DGP): Selection as per direction in Prakash Singh, (2006) 8 SCC 1, held, wholesome and does not require any modification. Prayer for modification of selection procedure as per said direction, rejected. [Prakash Singh v. Union of India, (2019) 4 SCC 6]

 Property Law — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Ss. 111(e), 111(f) and 105 to 117 — Lessor-Lessee Relationship — Non-termination of, ipso facto on execution of an agreement to sell tenanted premises to tenant: Mere entering into of such an agreement to sell does not determine the lease/tenancy. Rather, it is necessary to determine whether the parties intended to surrender the lease on execution of such agreement in relation to the tenanted premises, or they intended to keep the lease subsisting notwithstanding the execution of such agreement. If the parties really intended to surrender their tenancy rights as contemplated in Ss. 111(e) or (f) of the TP Act while entering into an agreement to sell, it would have made necessary provision to that effect by providing a specific clause in the agreement. In the absence of such clause/clause akin thereto in the agreement or the conditions in the agreement which discerned the intention of the parties to surrender the tenancy either expressly or impliedly, held, the same did not result in determination of the tenancy. [H.K. Sharma v. Ram Lal, (2019) 4 SCC 153]

Service Law — Pay — Parity in pay/Pay scale — Claim to — Factors to be considered — Competent authority — Extent of judicial review permissible: Equation of pay scales must be left to Government and decision of experts. Courts must refrain from interfering therewith. [Punjab SEB v. Thana Singh, (2019) 4 SCC 113]

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — S. 43 — Object — Embodies doctrines of estoppel and equity — Applicability: It is clear from Section 43 of the TP Act that if at the time of transfer, the vendor/transferor might have a defective title or have no title and/or no right or interest, however subsequently the transferor acquires the right, title or interest and the contract of transfer subsists, in that case at the option of the transferee, such a transfer is valid. In such a situation, the transferor cannot be permitted to challenge the transfer and/or the transferor has no option to raise the dispute in making the transfer. [Tanu Ram Bora v. Promod Ch. Das, (2019) 4 SCC 173]

Tweet

The post 2019 SCC Vol. 4 April 21, 2019 Part 1 appeared first on SCC Blog.

2019 SCC Vol. 4 April 21, 2019 Part 1 published first on https://sanantoniolegal.tumblr.com/

[krystalsteel]

Stainless Steel Flat Bar in Rajkot

Overview: Krystal Steels Krystal Steel is leading Manufacturer, Exporter and Supplier of Stainless Steel Flat Bar in Rajkot, Gujarat, India. We specialize in providing a wide array of stainless steel products including sheets, plates, coils, fasteners, pipes, tubes, bars, wires, rods, strip coils, angles, channels, flats, industrial valves, flanges, fittings, and dairy valves. Our products adhere to industry standards such as ASTM, ASME, AISI, DIN, BS, EN, IS, and JIS, guaranteeing exceptional quality. Our extensive range encompasses stainless steel in welded and seamless forms, as well as carbon steel, nickel, and alloy angles, channels, and flat bars. We offer these stainless steel products in various material grades, forms, types, and specifications, demonstrating our commitment to delivering high-quality products at competitive prices. Features: Available in all sizes Made from high-grade material Ready stock for immediate delivery Export packing ensures secure shipment. Technical Specification: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Length: 1 meters – 7 meters ( 4 feet to 24 feet Size: 24×1 mm to 150×50 mm Finish: 2B, HR, Matt PVC, No. 8 PVC Form: SS Angles, SS Channels, SS Flats Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Anneling, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202 , 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255 Carbon Steel: ASTM A105 / ASME SA105, ASTM A350 LF2, LTCS. Alloy Steel: AISI 4130, 4140, 4142, 4145, 4150, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4350, 4620, 4820, 6150, 8620, 8630, 8822, 9310, 52100, HY80, HY100, 9315, 300M, Nitralloy 135M, 17-22A, 42CrMoA, EN19, SAE 4140, EN24 Application: Oil & Gas Exploration Petrochemicals and Refineries Fertilizer Plants Chemical Industries Food and Dairy Paper Industries Sugar Cross Country Pipe Line for Gas & Water Krystal Steel serves as a Manufacturer and Supplier of Stainless Steel Flat Bar in Rajkot, Gujarat, India catering to locations like Aji, Gondal, Bhaktinagar, Jetpur, Kuvadva, Jasdan, Wankaner, Upleta, Morbi, Dhoraji, Vaghasia. For further details, please feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelFlatBarinRajkot

[simplexsteel]

Stainless Steel Round Bar in Bengaluru

Simplex Steels is Manufacturer, Exporter and Supplier of Stainless Steel Round Bar in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Simplex Steels specialized in SS Products and MS Products like SS Sheet, Plate, Coils, Pipes, Tubes, Bar, Wires, Rods, Angles, Channels, Flats, SS Fittings, Pipe, Tubes, Industrial Flanges, SS Fasteners, SS Dairy Valves. Stainless Steel Round Bars are versatile and widely utilized across industries. They come in various dimensions and sizes, including custom options to meet specific industrial needs. Renowned for their robust corrosion resistance and weldability, these bars excel in acidic environments and offer superior pitting corrosion resistance. Manufactured under the expertise of our experienced team and advanced machining technology, our Stainless Steel Round Bars undergo rigorous quality checks. We prioritize customer satisfaction, ensuring each bar is inspected thoroughly before delivery. We Offering top-quality Stainless Steel Round Bars at competitive prices, we aim to provide value in the steel market. Features: Dimensional accuracy Durable Chemical resistance High strength Corrosion resistance Excellent finish Specification: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 5 mm To 500 mm Size: from 2.00mm to 6.35mm (0.078″ to 0.25″) dia. Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Anneling, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255 Simplex Steels is a Supplier of Stainless Steel Round Bar in Bengaluru, Karnataka and including locations like Mysuru, Mangaluru, Hubballi, Belgaum, Gulbarga, Bellary, Hospet, Mandya, Mangaluru, Mysuru, Raichur, Shivamogga, Shravanabelagola, Shrirangapattana, Tumakuru, Vijayapura. For further information, feel free to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelRoundBarinBengaluru

[luvanametal]

Stainless Steel Bars Manufacturer

Luvana Metal Corporation are Manufacturer, Exporter and Supplier of Stainless Steel Bars in Thane, Maharashtra.

We are an ISO 9001:2015-certified corporation headquartered in Ankleshwar and Pune, India. We specialize in SS coils, sheets, plates, bars, rods, wires, valves, pipes, fittings, channels, angles, buttweld fittings, flanges, and fasteners.

Adhering to Indian and International standards like ASME, ASTM, ANSI, AISI, etc., we meticulously manufacture pipes and seamless tubes. Our Stainless Steel Round Bars, solid cylindrical bars crafted from stainless steel, are a core focus of our offerings.

Regulated by PLC, our Stainless Steel Round Bars, made from stainless steel, meet production needs for medium and small enterprises. We manufacture and supply custom-sized Stainless Steel Round Bars, catering to the unique industrial requirements of our customers.

These bars, renowned for robust corrosion resistance and weldability, excel in acidic settings, offering pitting corrosion resistance. Our experienced team, employing advanced machining technology, manufactures our Stainless Steel Round Bars.

We conduct rigorous quality checks, inspecting each bar to ensure the highest standards, reflecting our commitment to customer satisfaction.

Specifications:

Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 5 mm To 500 mm Size: from 2.00mm to 6.35mm (0.078″ to 0.25″) dia. Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel Grades: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255.

Luvana Metal Corporation is Supplier of Stainless Steel Bars in Thane, Maharashtra serves diverse locations such as Ahmednagar, Akola, Amravati, Aurangabad, Bhandara, Bhusawal, Buldhana, Chandrapur, Daulatabad, Dhule, Jalgaon, Kalyan, Karli, Kolhapur, Mahabaleshwar, Malegaon, Matheran, Mumbai, Nagpur, Nanded, Nashik, Osmanabad, Pandharpur, Parbhani, Pune, Ratnagiri, Sangli, Satara, Sevagram, Solapur, Thane, Ulhasnagar, Vasai-Virar, Wardha, Yavatmal.

[krystalsteel]

Stainless Steel Rods Manufacturers and Suppliers in India

Stainless Steel Rods Manufacturers and Suppliers in India Krystal Steel stands as one of India's largest manufacturers and suppliers of stainless steel rods, holding ISO 9001:2015 certification in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Our extensive range of stainless steel products includes SS sheets, plates, coils, fasteners, pipes, tubes, bars, wires, rods, strip coils, angles, channels, flats, industrial valves, flanges, industrial fittings, and dairy valves. We pride ourselves on producing impeccable quality wire rods in various grades and sizes at our advanced manufacturing facility in Gujarat, India. Utilizing state-of-the-art machines, we ensure utmost customer satisfaction. The Stainless Steel Wire Rod division is equipped with a fully automatic wire rod mill from Siemens Italy, along with solution annealing, soft annealing, pickling plants, and high-end automation facilities adhering to proven quality standards. Specifications: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 2mm To 10mm Wire Size: 0.1mm to 12mm Round bar Size: 4mm to 300mm Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Annealing, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel Grades: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255. Our Testing Facilities: Computerized Tensile Testing Machine Bend Testing Wrap Testing Torsion Testing Machine Hardness Testing Machine IGC Testing Facilities Cold Upset Test Facility PMI Tester Chemical Composition Analyzers Radioactive Contamination Testing Applications: Our stainless steel wire rods find applications in shipbuilding, agriculture, petroleum, automobile, welding electrodes, bright bars, household appliances, and more. We are proud Stainless Steel Rods Manufacturers and Suppliers in India, serving various locations across states like Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chandigarh, Chhattisgarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Delhi, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Ladakh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Odisha, Puducherry, Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and West Bengal. For more information or inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us. Read the full article

#StainlessSteelRodsManufacturersandSuppliersinIndia

[krystalsteel]

Top Stainless Steel Wire Supplier in Andhra Pradesh

Krystal Steel is an ISO 9001:2015 certified company in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, We are leading Manufacturer, Exporter, and Top Stainless Steel Wire Supplier in Andhra Pradesh. We provide a diverse range of stainless steel products, including SS Sheets, Plates, Coils, Fasteners, Pipes, Tubes, Bars, Wires, Rods, Strip Coils, Angles, Channels, Flats, Industrial Valves, Flanges, Industrial Fittings, and Dairy Valves. Our manufacturing expertise extends to SS Bars, Rods & Wires, featuring various material grades such as Duplex & Super Duplex Steel, Stainless Steel, Hastelloy, Monel, Inconel, Nickel, Cupronickel, and more. Stainless steel bars come in customizable options like size, shapes (round, hex, rectangle, square, etc.), thickness, and finishing. Our Stainless Steel Bars, Rods & Wires are available in a variety of sizes and grades, providing a comprehensive range for different applications. We supply these products made from various materials like cut material, boiler-grade plate, coil plate, and floor plate, among others. Technical Specifications: Dimensions: ASTM, ASME, API. Thickness: 2 mm To 10 mm Wire Size: 0.1mm to 12mm Round bar Size: 4mm to 300mm Finish: Bright, Black, Polish Form: SS Bars, SS Wires, S Rods Condition: Cold Drawn & Polished Cold Drawn, Centreless Ground & Polished Other Services: Machining (CNC), Centreless Grinding (CG), Heat Treatment, Anneling, Pickling, Polish, Rolling, Forging, Cutting, Bending, Minor Fabrication Stainless Steel: AISI 202, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304L, 310, 316, 316L, 317, 321, 347, 410, 416, 420, 430, 431, F51, F53, F55, F44, UNS S21800, Alloy 20, 904L, PH13-8Mo, 17-4ph, 15-5ph, 17-7ph, Ph15-7 Mo, 254Smo, Al-6Xn, 654SMO, duplex 2205, duplex 2507, nitronic ferralium 255 Krystal Steel is Top Stainless Steel Wire Supplier in Andhra Pradesh and Including locations like Adoni, Amaravati, Anantapurm, Chandragiri, Chittoor, Dowlaiswaram, Eluru, Guntur, Kadapa, Kakinada, Kurnool, Machilipatnam, Nagarjunakoṇḍa, Rajahmundry, Srikakulam, Tirupati, Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam, Vizianagaram, Yemmiganur. For further information or inquiries, please don't hesitate to contact us. Read the full article

#Adoni #Ahmedabad #Amaravati #Anantapurm #angles #bars #boiler-gradeplate #Chandragiri #Channels #Chittoor #coilplate #Coils #Cupronickel #DairyValves #Dowlaiswaram #Duplex&SuperDuplexSteel #Eluru #Exporter #Fasteners #Flanges #flats #floorplate #Gujarat #Guntur #Hastelloy #hex #Inconel #India #IndustrialFittings #IndustrialValves