#pashinian

[dostoyevsky-official]

Armenian PM Warns Of ‘Large-Scale’ Azeri Attack On Armenia

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on Thursday rejected Azerbaijan’s continuing demands for legislative changes in Armenia and said that Baku may be planning “large-scale” military aggression against his country. Pashinian complained that despite his readiness for compromise, the Azerbaijani leadership is pursuing a “policy of military coercion” in an effort to clinch more Armenian territory and other concessions from Yerevan. He said that it is reluctant to delimit the long border between the two states where four Armenian soldiers were killed in an Azerbaijani ceasefire violation on Tuesday. “Our analysis shows that there may be one reason for this and that reason may be, for example, the launch of military operations at some sections of the border with the prospect of turning the military escalation into a full-scale war against Armenia,” he said during a weekly cabinet meeting in Yerevan. [...] Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev reiterated on Wednesday that he will not sign a peace treaty discussed by the two sides “if Armenia does not bring its legislation to a normal state.” He said that legislation contains territorial claims to Azerbaijan.

Armenian soldiers killed by Azerbaijani fire in biggest skirmish since exodus

Armenia said on Tuesday that four of its soldiers were killed by Azerbaijani fire along the two countries' heavily militarised border, the first fatal incident since they began negotiating a deal to end more than 30 years of intermittent war last year.

as i said before, azerbaijan is going to invade and conquer armenia within the next 5 years

#there is no light at the end of the tunnel and there is nothing you can do to change anything save send some esims or aid donations #israel will raze rafa and kill tens of thousands #russia gained the upper hand in ukraine #etc.

[zvaigzdelasas]

[RFE/RL is US State Media]

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian says Armenia needs an entirely new constitution rather than a constitutional reform to ensure his country's democratic "legitimacy" and viability.

Pashinian told a meeting at the Justice Ministry on January 19 that the next constitution should make Armenia "more competitive and viable in the new geopolitical conditions."[...]

In 2021, Pashinian, a liberal opposition leader who rose to lead the country on the back of a 2018 revolution that ousted the former ruling elite, formed the Council for Constitutional Reforms, which has sought to improve the parliamentary system.[...]

On January 19, the prime minister hosted Javier Colomina, the NATO secretary-general's special representative for the Caucasus and Central Asia.

19 Jan 24

[News.AM is Armenian Private Media]

"Azerbaijan rejects them [i.e. Armenia’s proposals] because they do not intend to go to peace. If they wanted peace, it would have happened a long time ago; that's why they reject all our proposals. They won't accept our last proposal about overseeing each other's weapons because they will never allow you to oversee their weapons. They can take a simple reason that ‘we have four neighboring countries, and I can start a war with others tomorrow. Who are you to come and oversee my weapons?’ When we [i.e. Armenia] are sincere in our desires, whereas they [i.e. Azerbaijan] have ulterior motives," said Melkonyan.

"Second, we say a mirror withdrawal of troops because we want peace, but they don't want [it]. We say to them to withdraw from the frontline, and let the border demarcation and delimitation work be done; they do not agree. They are in our territories and do not want to go out. We already understood that they do not want to go to peace. No matter what condition we set, they will not agree because they intend to attack our country," stated the Armenian ruling force MP.

And because of this, according to Melkonyan, Armenia should restore the military balance, and "find new friends, new allies to be able to ensure our security."

30 Jan 24

[i-merani]

I dont know how much you people are interested in politics but Putin literally said what his plans were at 2007 Munich conference… like he declared that he wanted a new world order and literally in the video you can see how world leaders are baffled and agitated because that is a huge fuck you to the international community. Nothing is new under the sun.

So in 2007 Putin declared he wanted a new world order where Russia would be considered between world powers, in 2008 he invaded Georgia just to show how serious he was with his words, in 2011 Russia intervened in Syria, in 2014 Russia invaded Ukraine, in 2020 Russia let Armenia get crushed by Azerbaijan because Pashinian seemed too friendly to the west, in 2022 Russia invaded Ukraine again… (these are just biggest ones that i could remember but there are so much more)

How much clearer should a country declare its intensions? Should it actually write in red crayon like you all are kindergarten children?

Russia wants power and dominance and it is doing whatever's necessary to get them. Russia literally has never lied about its intentions, never had to because all of you lie to yourselves, you do Russia's job for itself. Good job, useful idiots!

#how much harm stupidity does #markel you lil shit soo much is your fault… #ruscism #russia #politics #russia is a terrorist state #georgia #ukraine #caucasus region #baltic states #mine

[dougielombax]

Just leaving a few more articles here.

Feel free to reblog.

Reblog the shit out of this.

#dougie rambles #political crap #armenia #artsakh #Europe #caucasus #azerbaijan #fuck azerbaijan #war crimes #genocide #terrorism #reblog this #reblog the shit out of this #aid #Japan

[generallemarc]

Haha! Suck it Putin! Warsaw Pacts were made to crumble.

[massispost]

New Post has been published on https://massispost.com/2023/11/armenia-is-diversifying-its-security-relations-because-of-absence-of-arms-supplies-from-partners/

Armenia is Diversifying Its Security Relations Because of Absence of Arms Supplies From Partners

YEREVAN — Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has defended the policy of…

#Armenia #Featured #News

[shahananasrin-blog]

[ad_1] Negotiations over a peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan are continuing, even as refugees continue to stream into Armenia following Azerbaijan's military assault on the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh last week. Senior advisers to Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met on September 26 in Brussels, in preparation for a potential meeting between the leaders themselves in Spain on October 5. A peace deal could -- at least on paper -- put to rest the decades-old conflict between the two sides. But there are broad fears in Armenia that Azerbaijan is not truly interested in peace, and that it may have further designs on Armenian territory -- including carving out territory for a transport corridor -- which could make it politically risky for the Armenian government to sign a deal. Azerbaijan's 24-hour offensive, which resulted in the surrender on September 20 of the separatist ethnic Armenian leadership that has ruled the territory since the 1990s, has partially resolved one of the thorniest issues that the two sides had been trying to work out: the fate of Karabakh's ethnic Armenian population. Azerbaijan has embarked on an effort to "reintegrate" the Karabakh Armenians into Azerbaijani structures, while the Armenians themselves are fleeing the territory by the tens of thousands. Pashinian and his allies have said they remain committed to reaching an agreement. "We are very close and have a historic opportunity to sign a peace agreement," parliament speaker Alen Simonian told Armenian public television on September 25. "Endless war is not beneficial for anyone." Baku and Yerevan have been locked in a conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh for decades. Armenian-backed separatists seized the mainly Armenian-populated region from Azerbaijan during a war in the early 1990s that killed some 30,000 people. Diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict brought little progress and the two sides fought another war in 2020 that lasted six weeks before a Russian-brokered cease-fire, resulting in Armenia losing control over parts of the region and seven adjacent districts. In 2022, Armenia and Azerbaijan started talks on a peace agreement that would formally delimit their mutual border, renounce territorial claims against each other, reestablish diplomatic relations, and rebuild transport links that have been broken for more than three decades. Those talks failed to prevent a violent resolution of the Karabakh issue, but they are set to continue as the two leaders work out the other issues on their agendas. 'The Next Big Issue' The last point -- rebuilding the transport links -- has been one of the most contentious and, in recent days, has prompted much mutual speculation. Azerbaijan and its key ally Turkey have signaled that, at least rhetorically, they are stepping back on one of their demands: that Armenia allow a road through its territory connecting Azerbaijan's mainland and its exclave of Naxcivan. Now that Nagorno-Karabakh has been fully reconquered, the transportation question represents "the next big issue" in Armenian-Azerbaijani talks, wrote Thomas de Waal, an analyst at Carnegie Europe. At issue is a transportation route that has become known by Azerbaijan's term for it, the "Zangezur Corridor," which was borne out of the cease-fire agreement that ended the 2020 war between the two sides. That deal included a provision committing Armenia to "guarantee the security" of transportation connections between Azerbaijan's mainland and Naxcivan. It didn't specify any particular route, but the shortest way between Naxcivan and the rest of Azerbaijan is through Armenia's Syunik Province, known in Azerbaijan as Zangezur. The 2020 agreement further stipulated that movement on those routes should be "unobstructed," which led to disagreements about what, precisely, counted as an obstruction. Azerbaijanis initially signaled that they wanted the road to be a true corridor, with no Armenian border or customs officers checking vehicles or cargo as it passed through Armenian territory. The route would connect Azerbaijan more tightly to Turkey, which shares a border with Naxcivan but not with mainland Azerbaijan. And Azerbaijani and Turkish officials have spoken of the would-be corridor in grandiose terms, as a means of linking the entire Turkic world, from Istanbul to Central Asia, with uninterrupted East-West road and rail connections. The Armenian side has objected that that would amount to the country losing sovereignty over part of its territory, and a strategically vital part at that: The presumed route of the corridor would pass along the Iranian border, potentially hindering Armenia's access to Iran, one of its key regional allies and trade partners. Iran, too, has objected, repeatedly hinting that it would not allow its border with Armenia to be obstructed. Armenia's fears were exacerbated by barely veiled threats from Aliyev to impose the corridor by force: "The Zangezur Corridor is a historical necessity," the president said in January. "It will happen whether Armenia wants it or not." Iran has not officially commented on the issue since the Karabakh surrender. 'Open Up, Or Else' In the days ahead of this month's Azerbaijani offensive, Erdogan used his address at the United Nations Security Council to accuse Armenia of not fulfilling its commitment to open the Zangezur Corridor, a topic heavily covered in Turkish pro-government media. And on the day that the Karabakh authorities surrendered, Hikmet Haciyev, Aliyev's senior foreign policy adviser, made a similar accusation. It all fed into fears that Azerbaijan, having reestablished control over Nagorno-Karabakh, would not stop there and would eventually extend its advance into Armenia itself. A truck arrives at an Azerbaijani checkpoint in the Zangilan district, close to the border with Armenia. But after Erdogan met with Aliyev in Naxcivan on September 26 to help celebrate the victory in Karabakh, Aliyev barely mentioned the transportation issue. "The construction of the railway connecting Azerbaijan with Naxcivan and Turkey is also progressing successfully," Aliyev said, not mentioning Armenia at all or using the term "Zangezur Corridor." "The work in the territory of Azerbaijan will most likely be completed by the end of next year." And as Erdogan returned to Turkey, he spoke with the media accompanying him and said that Armenia wasn't necessary for the project at all. "If Armenia does not pave the way for [the corridor], where will it pass through? It will pass through Iran," he said. "Iran currently considers this positively. So, it would be possible to pass from Iran to Azerbaijan." At a cabinet meeting later in the day, Erdogan reiterated the statement. Erdogan's argument has not been confirmed by Azerbaijani officials, but the idea was presaged in a September 17 article on Haqqin.az, a website associated with Azerbaijan's security services. It differentiated between a "Western Zangezur Corridor" through Armenia and an "Eastern Zangezur Corridor" through Iran. It concluded: "If Yerevan continues to delay the opening of the Western Zangezur Corridor, then Azerbaijan will open the Eastern Zangezur Corridor with Iran, which means that Armenia will remain outside of yet another strategic project and will once again be a loser." A senior official in Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to RFE/RL that the Iranian route would be acceptable for Baku. "The ball is in Armenia's court. If this country wants to establish overland communication with the outside world after 30 years of self-imposed isolation, they have to live up to their obligations on the Zangezur Corridor. If not, the communication will be established anyway, but in this case via Iran thus bypassing Armenia," the official said. As to whether Armenian officials would be able to monitor traffic on the road, the official said that was of secondary concern and would be a matter of negotiations. "The most important [thing] is the opening of the traffic itself," the official said. Not Pushing Pashinian Azerbaijan does not want to put additional pressure on Pashinian at a time when he is vulnerable domestically because of public outrage over the fate of Karabakh Armenians, says Fuad Shahbaz, a Baku-based political analyst. Azerbaijani officials fear that domestic turbulence in Armenia could result in revanchist forces coming to power in Yerevan. "Aliyev will give Armenia a bit of time to handle domestic unrest," Shahbaz said. He noted that Aliyev conspicuously praised Pashinian -- who during the offensive announced publicly that Armenian armed forces would not intervene -- in a victory address to the nation on September 20. "During this period, today and yesterday, Armenia has unexpectedly shown political competence, which we appreciate," Aliyev said. Protesters confront police standing guard outside the government building in Yerevan on September 21 during a rally to demand the resignation of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian following Nagorno-Karabakh's surrender. Aliyev also warned that "We must ensure that the other side does not live with revanchist ideas, and they must also rest assured that we do not have sights on their land. We recognize their territorial integrity." So, Baku may not push for the corridor to be included in a peace deal but would revisit the question later, Shahbaz suggested: "Azerbaijan may return to the topic but on favorable conditions for Armenia as well, not to trigger more unrest in Yerevan," he said. Armenian officials have said they have not changed their position on the corridor: They are interested in rebuilding regional transportation connections but reject a road that they wouldn't control. "Armenia has never agreed and will never agree to any sort of extraterritorial or corridor logic," Armenian Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Minister Gnel Sanosian said on September 25. "But at the same time, we are committed to agreements that have been reached at high levels." Some analysts have suggested that Azerbaijan and Turkey's championing of the Iran option may just be tactical, and that Baku still remains interested in a route through Armenia. "I don't believe that Azerbaijan and Turkey will forget about connecting Azerbaijan with Turkey via Armenia," said Benyamin Poghosian, the founding director of the Yerevan-based Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies. "The road via Iran can be an alternative but not the main one." He says he believes Baku is merely biding its time and will eventually demand a Zangezur Corridor as well as other territorial concessions. "Armenia will not be able to say yes to these demands," Poghosian said, "and then Azerbaijan will use the Armenian rejection as a casus belli." [ad_2]

[crp-center-blog]

Пашинян сообщил о программе ежемесячных выплат для беженцев из Карабаха Никол Пашинян. Фото с сайта правительства Армении. Помимо единовременной выплаты в размере 250 долларов США беженцы из Нагорного Карабаха как минимум полгода будут получать ежемесячные пособия. Об этом сообщил премьер-министр Армении Никол Пашинян. По его словам, на каждого вынужденного переселенца правительство выделит порядка 125 долларов в месяц, которые компенсируют расходы на проживание и оплату коммунальных … Сообщение Пашинян сообщил о программе ежемесячных выплат для беженцев из Карабаха появились сначала на Новости в России и мире.

https://warriorslight.ru/pashinian-soobshil-o-programme-ejemesiachnyh-vyplat-dlia-bejencev-iz-karabaha/

[eurovisionsocialnewswire]

ARMENIA: Armenian protesters block traffic in Yerevan

Opposition supporters protested at several locations in the Armenian capital, Yerevan, on September 25. The protesters want Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian to resign after Azerbaijan’s forces moved into the breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region and reached a deal with ethnic Armenian separatist leaders. Apart from a larger march, smaller groups of demonstrators blocked traffic and urged the public to…

View On WordPress

[newsaljazeera]

#News #Russia #RussiaInvadesUkraine

[delectablywaywardbeard-blog]

Scontri di fronte alla sede del governo a Erevan

Sono scoppiati scontri tra la polizia e i manifestanti vicino al palazzo del governo armeno nel centro di Erevan. Lo riporta la Tass citando le trasmissioni in diretta dei media locali. Secondo quanto riferito, la polizia ha utilizzato granate stordenti vicino all’edificio.     I manifestanti – scrive l’agenzia statale russa – chiedono le dimissioni del primo ministro Nicol Pashinian per “non…

View On WordPress

[rivaltimes]

Azeri President announces suspension of December meeting with Armenian PM

Azeri President announces suspension of December meeting with Armenian PM

Archive – Nikol Pashinyan, Charles Michel and Ilham Aliyev – Dario Pignatelli/European Council / DPA – File The President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, declared this Friday that the meeting scheduled for December 7 in Brussels with the Armenian Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinian, has supposedly been suspended due to the absence of the French President, Emmanuel Macron, from the meeting. as requested…

View On WordPress

[zvaigzdelasas]

[ArmenianWeekly is Armenian Media]

24 May 23

[DailySabah is Turkish Media]

26 May 23

[telodogratis]

Il conflitto tra Armenia e Azerbaigian inquieta Erdogan

Il conflitto tra Armenia e Azerbaigian inquieta Erdogan

AGI – I recenti scontri che hanno fatto nuovamente alzare la tensione in tra Armenia e Azerbaigian in Nagorno Karabakh mettono a serio rischio lo storico processo di normalizzazione avviato tra Turchia e Armenia. Già nei mesi scorsi le proteste andate in scena nella capitale Yerevan contro le ‘eccessive concessioni’ all’Azerbaigian, la richiesta di dimissioni del premier Nikol Pashinian avevano…

View On WordPress

[kingsmeninternationalgroup]

[generallemarc]

Absolutely what Russia wants to hear from a member of it's customs union and mini-Warsaw Pact.