These kinds of comments really bug me because it's so clear how confused the person who wrote them is.
So let me clear this up for you, @nagashii
Israel has not stolen Palestinian culture. Of all the ridiculous claims you could make, this one is probably the most silly because it's absolutely meaningless. I'd love to hear what cultural things you think we "stole", but I'm just letting you know that whatever you think it is, you're wrong. I'm not gonna bother elaborating
You're making a very important distinction between Jews and Israel, which is great except you screwed it up. You are assuming that the existence of Jews is not dependent on the existence of Israel, while ignoring the fact that the REASON Israel exists is to protect the Jewish people. Even if there's a very Jewish person who has no interest in Israel, Israel has helped them in more ways than you can imagine. Israel gives money and aid to Jewish community and it's also gained the right to prosecute people who commit antisemitic hate crimes in other countries. So you can say that Jews are okay but Israel needs to die, but you're basically saying Jews need to die, which is, obviously, antisemitic and disgusting.
Israel doesn't have genocidal ideals, don't be idiotic. If Israel wanted to commit genocide, believe me, there would be no humanitarian aid, no warnings, no attempts to evacuate gazans. The IDF has absolutely no interest in harming anyone who isn't part of Hamas, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. The fact that Hamas uses its civilians as human shields makes this incredibly hard. I know people who are currently fighting in Gaza. Trust me, killing more people is the last thing they want. Obviously there are some morons who want to kill everyone and take Gaza back, but they're idiots and nobody really gives a shit what they think because they're being childish and narrow. Those few people do not represent Israel.
The Jewish people are absolutely and completely entitled to have a country of their own, and the fact that Israel was the land chosen has not only Historical and Traditional but also Legal reasons. I'll reblog this with links to useful explanations. As I said, Israel is essential to the continued existence of the Jewish people which means that yes, we are entitled to it. Absolutely. Whether or not all the actions of the Israeli government are okay is a completely different story. The botton line is that Israel must and will continue to exist.
Hope this helps.
341 notes
·
View notes
Ku Klux Kate Middleton. The Windsors latest, ludicrously racist, Exocet missile!
By Stanley Collymore
I'm fully cognizant of the very
obvious fact that the Exocet
missile is French and that
clearly without its evidently genius
technological expertise, a basically
tired, rather haggard and actually
unfit Britain so clearly would not
have won the Falklands War but
it didn't stop these undoubtedly,
ingrained failures, from simply
cheering themselves fulsomely
to the roof tops however while
also, really installing Margaret
Thatcher, as the most unlikely,
to intelligent minds obviously,
super hero; and similarly also
according this abysmal, racial
political failure of a woman a
huge irrefutably undeserving
election victory. Now literally,
we noxiously, quite obviously
have Charles Windsor simply
a basically pathetic, failure: a
simply lousy parent basically
distinctly like his own, a very
serial adulterer undoubtedly
both ways plus self-evidently
not simply just a close buddy
of several literally obnoxious
paedophiles, crucially Jimmy
Savile; and Bishop Peter Ball
quite obviously among them!
But to anyone who isn't blind
and can evidently think for
themselves it's distinctly
obvious, that Charles is undoubtedly
quite patently a veritable child man
with evidently very vigorous mood
swings; likewise literally an addict
of quite mindless flattery from his
lackeys and essentially obviously
as the clearly, evident masochist
that he really simply obviously is
just like numerous others among
his very privileged kind, relishes
the treatment, that he essentially
so undeniably desperately needs
and which Camilla simply hands
out to him and has actually been
doing all of these many years for
her own undeniably, discernibly
acquisitive ambitious intentions.
And, with all the residences that
they clearly have between them
only the distinctly obtuse would
really, label two married people
from the outset obviously living
separate lives and essentially in
different homes - they basically
didn't even spend that crucially
important night, one effectively
would naturally have generally
thought of his mother's funeral
together that normally spouses
out of shared grief, would have
done! So truly don't try kidding
someone like me with clearly a
genuine functioning brain that
what you have is love! In truth,
it isn't! For Camilla is evidently
Charles' dominatrix and he her
unquestionably so masochist!
As for William the least said
about this useless prat who
evidently bats both ways
just like his father does, is similarly
adulterous and who has cozied up
to Camilla principally, but not fully
exclusively because he obviously
knows the stranglehold, that she
distinctively, has over his father
Charles but just as significantly
because William is both power
hungry and essentially money
mad. A privileged, and simply
fatuously self-entitled prat he
has undeniably never done a
proper job of any kind really,
in his evidently pathetic and
overly racist life; and simply
the very presence obviously
of Meghan: a naturally very
highly educated, essentially
simply irrefutably mentally
liberated, Black female, has
undeniably shown not only
William but simply the rest
of them unquestionably up
for what they actually are;
hardcore racists obviously
milking the rather current
situation, for everything it
is worth while discernibly
significantly malevolently
very assiduously, briefing
the media rapaciously, on
Meghan and, also, Harry!
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
9 December 2023.
Author's Remarks:
The thing about Omid Scobie's book that fascinates me is that so many of you brainwashed serfs with your very entrenched feudal mindset are stating most categorically that Charles and his daughter-in-law Kate never said what they're reported to have said. Yet quite obviously you don't know them, have never met them and it's an undeniably absolute certainty to any logical person that the overwhelming majority of you never will.
So essentially you're very ludicrously defending people who you've never met simply because they're evidently incestuously largely, inbred members of some feudally entrenched and very risibly monarchical family ensconced in the 21st Century that you asininely worship because with no discernibly genuine lives of your own, you actually live your pathetic lives through them as you quite distinctively think and really think that in all regards they are rather superior to yourselves. How more vile and pathetic can you actually get? And this stems I imagine from the fact that their odious, racist views in all regards are distinctly similar to your own!
Charles Windsor and Co. are evidently an intrinsic part of an institution, the very basis of which is the distinctively plus inherently perceived supremacy, and its attendant superiority, over all others! So intelligently I shan't nor am I inclined to take their lame PR and very unconvincingly disseminated excuses or denials at face value. You can as you are essentially ignorant and relatively easily brainwashed: this Bajan/Briton isn't! And I'll go further and state that in my honest and clearly unequivocal view they're all as guilty and basically racist as Hell. And yes those undeniably derogatorily stated remarks of Ku Klux Kate Middleton are as authentic as one Jimmy Savile was a distinctly predatory paedophile; but you didn't believe that either!
In conclusion Meghan has revamped racist Kate! Now Kate actually looks like an American Meghan. Essentially and whether you want to accept it or not, Meghan is now the very authentic trailblazer for the distinctively rather dull Windsor family members. So from me, an excellent job well done Meghan, as K. K Kate Middleton, quite slavishly - no actual pun is intended (lol) dressing more like you now!
0 notes
something i dont understand about your points on voting; the one example ive seen people use is that biden has significantly decreased drone strikes (which is a good thing!! obviously!!!) but what i dont understand is how that is related to voting. to me it looks like that was essentially a personal descision that the commander in chief made; afaik biden didn't campaign on reducing drone strikes and he certainly hasn't been advertising the fact that hes been doing that; its not something that was relevant to most americans choice of who to vote for. idk if this makes sense but like, i voted for biden and i don't think i had a single scrap of input on his choice to reduce drone strikes. it seems to me like american politicians are willing to lean on warhawk shit at the drop of a hat, and not enough americans really give a shit about it for it to be relevant to voting choices at all.
Absolutely, yes. Your vote will not affect Biden's decisions in office, and the left is generally not organized enough, large enough, or unified enough in its demands to influence politics on a national level.
I think instead you should think of voting in as detached and instrumental a way as possible. Vote for the politician that you believe will do less harm. If you asked me which candidate's administration was more likely to end the drone war, I would have said Biden, simply because of the people who are more likely to be advising him and Trump's terrible record on it.
If you want to really get involved in politics and actually influence things, you have to organize on a local level. Start paying attention to school board elections, join the DSA, vote in primaries, learn about all those random city government positions no one gives a shit about, etc etc. But voting on a national level isn't really about influence, it's about getting a little more marginal value by pushing for the better of two bad options. To me, that's worth spending half an hour to vote.
I don't think any of this relies on the belief that voting will create the reforms leftists want to see in the world, or that you need to have some sense of loyalty to the Democratic Party, as an organization. I'm with the democrats until the marginal value of supporting them is exceeded by the marginal value of supporting someone else, and I hope to one day live in a country where they're the center-right option that my candidates look to defeat.
Politics is about a lot more than voting - I think unionization drives, mutual aid networks, and grassroots organizing campaigns are all necessary and important components for anyone who cares about leftist politics. But voting is free money - it's influence that you don't have to work for. A leftist movement that has no electoral strategy at all is strictly inferior to one that at least thinks about harm mitigation.
40 notes
·
View notes