#michael coren | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

rebeccathenaturalist · 1 year

Text

An App Does Not a Master Naturalist Make

Originally posted on my website at https://rebeccalexa.com/app-not-master-naturalist/ - I had written this as an op-ed and sent it to WaPo, but they had no interest, so you get to read it here instead!

I have mixed feelings about Michael Coren’s April 25 Washington Post article, “These 4 free apps can help you identify every flower, plant and tree around you.” His ebullience at exploring some of the diverse ecological community around him made me grin, because I know exactly what it feels like. There’s nothing like that sense of wonder and belonging when you go outside and are surrounded by neighbors of many species, instead of a monotonous wall of green, and that is a big part of what led me to become a Master Naturalist.

When I moved from the Midwest to the Pacific Northwest in 2006, I felt lost because I didn’t recognize many of the animals or plants in my new home. So I set about systematically learning every species that crossed my path. Later, I began teaching community-level classes on nature identification to help other people learn skills and tools for exploring their local flora, fauna, and fungi.

Threeleaf foamflower (Tiarella trifoliata)

Let me be clear: I love apps. I use Merlin routinely to identify unknown bird songs, and iNaturalist is my absolute favorite ID app, period. But these tools are not 100% flawless.

For one thing, they’re only as good as the data you provide them. iNaturalist’s algorithms, for example, rely on a combination of photos (visual data), date and time (seasonal data), and GPS coordinates (location data) to make initial identification suggestions. These algorithms sift through the 135-million-plus observations uploaded to date, finding observations that have similar visual, seasonal, and location data to yours.

There have been many times over the years where iNaturalist isn’t so sure. Take this photo of a rather nondescript clump of grass. Without seed heads to provide extra clues, the algorithms offer an unrelated assortment of species, with only one grass. I’ve gotten that “We’re not confident enough to make a recommendation” message countless times over my years of using the app, often suggesting species that are clearly not what I’m looking at in real life.

Because iNaturalist usually offers up multiple options, you have to decide which one is the best fit. Sometimes it’s the first species listed, but sometimes it’s not. This becomes trickier if all the species that are suggested look alike. Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissima), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra) and eastern black walnut (Juglans nigra) all have pinnately compound, lanceolate leaves, and young plants of these three species can appear quite similar. If all you know how to do is point and click your phone’s camera, you aren’t going to be able to confidently choose which of the three plants is the right one.

Coren correctly points out that both iNaturalist and Pl@ntNet do offer more information on suggested species—if people are willing to take the time to look. Too many assume ID apps will give an easy, instant answer. In watching my students use the app in person almost everyone just picks the first species in the list. It’s not until I demonstrate how to access the additional content for each species offered that anyone thinks to question the algorithms’ suggestions.

While iNaturalist is one of the tools I incorporate into my classes, I emphasize that apps in general are not to be used alone, but in conjunction with field guides, websites, and other resources. Nature identification, even on a casual level, requires critical thinking and observation skills if you want to make sure you’re correct. Coren’s assertion that you only need a few apps demonstrates a misunderstanding of a skill that takes time and practice to develop properly—and accurately.

Speaking of oversimplification, apps are not a Master Naturalist in your pocket, and that statement —while meant as a compliment–does a disservice to the thousands of Master Naturalists across the country. While the training curricula vary from state to state, they are generally based in learning how organisms interact within habitats and ecosystems, often drawing on a synthesis of biology, geology, hydrology, climatology, and other natural sciences. A Master Naturalist could tell you not only what species you’re looking at, but how it fits into this ecosystem, how its adaptations are different from a related species in another ecoregion, and so forth.

Map showing Level III and IV ecoregions of Oregon, the basis of my training as an Oregon Master Naturalist.

In spite of my criticisms, I do think that Coren was absolutely onto something when he described the effects of using the apps. Seeing the landscape around you turn from a green background to a vibrant community of living beings makes going outside a more exciting, personal experience. I and my fellow nature nerds share an intense curiosity about the world around us. And that passion, more than any app or other tool, is fundamental to becoming a citizen naturalist, Master or otherwise.

Did you enjoy this post? Consider taking one of my online foraging and natural history classes or hiring me for a guided nature tour, checking out my other articles, or picking up a paperback or ebook I’ve written! You can even buy me a coffee here!

#iNaturalist #plant apps #Seek #Merlin #nature #wildlife #plant identification #apps #botany #biology #science #scicomm #science communication #Google Lens #naturalist #Master Naturalist #conservation #environment

624 notes · View notes

panelshowsource · 9 months

Text

introducing panelist collections on google drive!

off the back of about a million requests i've gotten for more david tennant and michael sheen in britcom content, i've made little panelist "collection" folders on google drive with lots of goodies! along with episodes of a person's panel show appearances, i've added misc late night show and light entertainment appearances; radio sitcoms/dramas/plays; narrated audiobooks; podcast eps and interviews; and a few scripted series and films. this should be a convenient way to binge a specific actor/comedian :)

these collections don't include every thing they've ever done and aren't mean to be full filmography archives — the content is often related or adjacent to britcom, or just stuff i had on hand :) note i generally did not add episodes of series very easily available on youtube, like cats does countdown (which i currently don't host), and can always add more content later!

i know it's just a few but starting off with these collections for these guys :)

alex horne

david tennant

joe wilkinson

michael sheen

victoria coren mitchell

here's an example of how a collection folder looks, for those of you on mobile:

i hope you enjoy these! i've linked them over on the secondary masterpost, so please bookmark there :)

would love to hear any feedback on this idea! as well, if there's anyone you'd like a collection folder for, feel free to send me a request!

—

PANEL SHOW WATCH LINKS MASTERPOST / FAQ / TAGS / ASK

#p #my fingers kinda hurt ngl hahaha

88 notes · View notes

stupittmoran · 10 months

Text

My guess is Michael Coren is a pedophile 🤡🌎

49 notes · View notes

mary-of-magdala · 1 year

Text

"But authentic Christianity should break rather than observe the established rules, and is called not to preserve the status quo but to turn it upside down. That is the tune of the Gospels, those are the lyrics of the cross, and the melody of the cross."

The Rebel Christ, Michael Coren

#christianity #queer christianity #quotes #christianity and resistance #mary.txt

23 notes · View notes

russnightlife · 10 months

Text

There are very few priests whose articles I would post on here, or anywhere. But this article is something special.

#lgbtq #lgbtq rights #people can change #and atone for the damage they did before they changed

9 notes · View notes

tellthemeerkatsitsfine · 1 year

Text

Fun facts - well, very-slightly-to-mildly-to-not-at-all interesting facts - related to comedians’ names:

- One time on No More Jockeys, Mark Watson, Tim Key, and Alex Horne spent a minute or so discussing the fact that Angela Barnes has the most Christmassy name out of all the comedians, because Angels are in the nativity story, and Jesus was born in a barn. They were so pleased with themselves for working this out, until they remembered Jarred Christmas. And Noel Fielding.

- When I Google the name “Joe Thomas” from Canada with no VPN on, most of the top results are about an American football player by that name. When I Google the same thing with a VPN making my computer think it’s in England, most of the top results are about the comedian and actor.

- In the absolutely terrible show – truly my biggest guilty pleasure, the worst show I’ve ever enjoyed – Roast Battle, Johnny Vegas goes on with Phil Ellis, a guy who’s never been on TV before or since. This guy went really hard, saying something about his wife leaving which had apparently actually happened recently, and none of that bothered Johnny Vegas at all. Until the guy brought up the fact that his name is actually Michael Pennington, at which point Johnny told him to shut up and sounded like he genuinely meant it. Like a kid at school who doesn’t want their embarrassing middle name said out loud.

- I assumed for ages that Rhod Gilbert’s full name was Roderick or Rodney, and only learned fairly recently that it’s Rhodri. That’ll teach me to make Anglicized assumptions. On the subject of Celtic names being Anglicized, David O’Doherty has a bit on one of his albums about how forms that don’t let you put punctuation in a name leave out a lot of Irish people, and I noticed he always signs his own posts “do’d” even though I called him “DOD” because that’s what everyone called him in Never Mind the Buzzcocks’ YouTube comments. That’s why I started calling him DO’D; I figure that whether he does it as some sort of statement about not wanting the Irish apostrophe erased, or whether it’s just for no reason, may as well call people what they want to be called. I do not, however, extend that to finding the special character every time I want to write Dara Ó Briain’s name.

- Alan Coren, the guy who used to be on The News Quiz a lot, was the father of Victoria Coren Mitchell. That’s not really a fact about names, it’s just that their shared name should have made me realize it a lot sooner. For someone who collects Britcom-related facts for no reason, I learned that one way too recently.

- Russell Joseph Howard and Jon Joel Richardson both have middle names that can be shortened to Joe. Which is not particularly interesting, but they discovered it, I think, four separate times on their radio show. One of their middle names would come up in passing, and then the other would say, “Oh that’s almost like my middle name”, and then they’d discuss it. I can believe they genuinely forgot that until the next time it came up, because it’s not that interesting a fact, and for them ages had passed, while for me it had only been a week since I went through the 126 hours of that radio show ridiculously quickly. After the first time, every time middle names were mentioned I’d tell my phone, “Yes, your middle names are slightly similar, now work that out and get on with it.” The fourth time it happened, Jon said, “Have we had this conversation before?” and Russell said, “I don’t think so.”

- On a slightly similar note of two comedians who were close friends having middle names overlap, Daniel Kitson’s middle name is John. This would only be a slightly interesting fact if John Oliver’s middle name were Daniel, which it isn’t, it’s William. However, Daniel Kitson did name himself William in several different shows, including one that had two separate versions of himself, both named William. Clearly he feels that his name was meant to be William, subconsciously understanding that we were meant to have the mildly interesting fact of his and John Oliver’s names overlapping.

- Jon Richardson and Richard Osman’s names being Richard and Richard’s son – something Alex Horne pointed out once on Taskmaster season 2 but I think it was good enough so he could have got away with it at least a couple more times since it was a joke about both their names and their heights – means the time they were a Catsdown team and Jimmy did his shitty autocue put-downs of Jon and Richard told him to stop, it looked like:

- Charlie Brooker is not a stage name; it’s a shortened version of his actual first name. And that actual first name is Charleton.

- Similarly, Al is a shortened version of Al Murray’s real first name, which is Alastair.

- Barratt’s his middle name. His full name is Julian Barratt Pettifer. I see why he doesn’t go by that.

- It is absolutely ridiculous that the fan-agreed portmanteau for The Mighty Boosh is Noelian, when FieldRat is right there.

- On the subject of portmanteaus, season 12 is the Taskmaster season in which both teams can have their names put together easily: Victorialan and Morguziree. No other season has teams that can be referenced by one name that easily, and I should know, as I’ve written summaries of episodes from a bunch of seasons and it’s a lot easier when there’s an easy team name like that, instead of writing out “the team of two” or “Josh, Roisin, and Romesh” every time. I mean, I guess “Josh, Roisin, and Romesh” is a bad example because their season does have one that works: Frankey. But season 12 is the only one where you can do that really easily with both teams.

- I assumed for ages that Jo Brand’s first name was short for Joanne, but it isn’t, it’s Josephine. Which I thought was cool, because that name was outdated even by the time Jo Brand was born, you don’t hear it often, and it reminds me of my favourite character from a book I loved as a kid: Jo March (it was a plot point that she went by this instead of Josephine, to sound like more of a tomboy, which I of course liked) from Little Women. I found this even cooler when I read Jo Brand’s book, and learned that her parents actually named her Josephine after Jo March. She has an outdated name because she’s named after a character in a book from 1868.

- Frank Skinner’s real first name is Chris. Christopher Graham Collins, in fact, meaning the name “Frank Skinner” bears no relation to the name of the man who briefly married the 17-year-old girl who was his student when he lectured at her college. Not all the facts are fun.

- You know that annoying thing where whenever you write the name David Walliams, you have to make sure you didn’t accidentally write “David Williams”, since “Williams” is an actual name and Walliams is not? Well it turns out that “David Williams” is his real name, and “Walliams” is a stage name. So that annoying thing where it’s hard to spell his name right didn’t even have to be the case! This is the 578th most significant way in which David Walliams did not have to be as annoying as he actually is.

26 notes · View notes

officialyourdailyinspiration · 2 years

Text

I recently came across my old WWJD wristband. These wristbands, which reached peak popularity in the 1990s, reminded wearers to consider “What Would Jesus Do?” as they went about their day. Although the phrase and the wristbands are less commonly used today, the question “What Would Jesus Do?” was posed in an article I came across recently that discussed Pride month. The same author published another article earlier this month that made the same point, namely that Jesus never condemned homosexuality and that if He were alive today, He would wave a rainbow flag and march in a Pride parade.

While conservative Christians may be tempted to dismiss these articles as clearly unbiblical, I believe it is naïve not to engage with these arguments. In fact, studies have shown that those who identify as Christian are increasingly open to pro-LGBT messaging and are willing to reconsider the Bible’s teaching on homosexuality. In fact, according to a 2020 study by the Cultural Research Center, 34% of evangelicals reject the idea that marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman. Despite professing faith in Christ, these evangelicals believe that Christian sexual ethics need to be revisited.

Thus, contemporary writers who argue that Jesus did not condemn homosexuality, like Michael Coren and Matthew Vines, cannot be ignored. According to Coren, Jesus was “radically indifferent” to homosexuality. Moreover, since the theme of the gospels is “love, acceptance, and a permanent revolution of grace,” Christians should affirm those who identify as LGBT.

Considering these recent arguments, how should conservative Christians respond to modern interpreters who argue that the New Testament allows for a pro-LGBT sexual ethic or that Jesus was indifferent to homosexuality?

First, it is true that Jesus never directly addressed homosexuality in the gospels. However, it is wrong to assume that because Jesus never addressed homosexuality directly, He would therefore have affirmed same-sex unions. This is an argument from silence and is unpersuasive. Notably, Jesus says nothing about rape, bestiality, or incest, and yet no one believes He endorsed these practices.

Others appeal to an ethic of love: Jesus would have supported same-sex relationships because His core message was one of love, and it is unloving to deny people who identify as homosexual opportunities for love and companionship. Despite its emotional appeal, this argument is also unpersuasive and ignores the available evidence that strongly suggests Jesus would not affirm same-sex relations. Two points are worth noting.

First, Jesus believed in the binding authority of the Old Testament Scriptures. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus explained He did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17). He also said, “Whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:19).

In short, Jesus upheld the requirements of the Old Testament law. For example, when He heals a leper in Matthew 8, He tells him to go to a priest and “offer the gift that Moses commanded,” as Leviticus 13 requires (Matthew 8:4). On the few occasions Jesus “adjusted” Old Testament provisions — such as when He limits the grounds for divorce to sexual immorality in Matthew 19 — the New Testament is very clear. Because Jesus did not indicate otherwise, the only logical conclusion is that He fully agreed with the sexual ethics of the Old Testament and His Jewish heritage regarding homosexuality. To assume otherwise is an unwarranted argument from silence. (Note: Biblical scholars often make a distinction between civil, ceremonial, and moral laws in the Old Testament. Whereas the specific civil and ceremonial laws were fulfilled in Christ, aspects of the moral law are still in place. For example, the command to not commit adultery still stands, while the command that the Israelites execute those caught in adultery does not.)

Second, Jesus affirmed the creation pattern for marriage. When the Pharisees question Jesus about divorce in Mark 10, He responds by quoting Genesis 1 and 2. He says, “But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh” (Mark 10:7-8; cf. Matthew 19:4-6). According to Jesus, married couples should not divorce because marriage is a one-flesh relationship. He affirms the one-flesh nature of marriage by citing Genesis 2:24. But significantly, He also affirms the sexual differentiation of male and female by quoting Genesis 1:27. As ethicist Ken Magnuson notes, “If sexual difference, in terms of marriage and sexual relations, was unimportant to Jesus, there was no need for him to cite Genesis 1:27.”

By drawing attention to humanity’s creation as “male and female” in the context of a discussion on marriage, Jesus signals His acceptance of the Old Testament’s vision for marriage and sexuality.

In addition to Jesus’s affirmation of the creation pattern for marriage, there are other verses in the New Testament that condemn homosexual practices. These include 1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:10.

In 1 Corinthians 6:9, Paul writes, “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality.” Similarly, in 1 Timothy 1:10, Paul includes “men who practice homosexuality” as among the “lawless” and “disobedient.”

Both passages are significant for understanding the Bible’s teaching on homosexuality. Notably, they affirm the Old Testament’s prohibition on same-sex relations. Although each passage merits a lengthy discussion, only the most important details will be noted here.

First, in 1 Corinthians 6, Paul lists different kinds of people who will be excluded from the kingdom of God unless they repent. In the list, Paul includes four references to sexual sin, including two that mention homosexual behavior. The relevant terms are malakoi and arsenokoitai. Rightly interpreting these Greek words is crucial to understanding what Paul teaches about homosexuality. English translators render the relevant terms in various ways. Some translations combine the terms, whereas others render the words separately.

Consider a few examples: - ESV: “men who practice homosexuality” - NSAB: “effeminate” and “homosexuals” - NIV (1984): “male prostitutes” and “homosexual offenders” - NIV (2011): “men who have sex with men”

Although space does not allow for a lengthy treatment of these terms, a few points should be made. First, malakoi had a wide range of meanings in the ancient world. Often it meant “effeminate” or “soft.” It was also used in Hellenistic Greek as pejorative slang to describe “passive” partners in homosexual activity. At first glance, it might seem challenging to ascertain Paul’s exact use of the term in this passage. However, context is key. And the context of 1 Corinthians 6, with its mention and condemnation of sexual sin, indicates Paul is using the term to refer to passive partners in homosexual relations. This becomes clear by the placement of malakoi alongside arsenokoitai.

The second term under consideration is arsenokoitai, a compound word formed by combining arsen (“male”) and koites (“bed”). These terms are found in Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, passages that prohibit homosexual relations. Leviticus 20:13 says, “If a man lies with a male as with a woman [meta arsenos koiten gynaikos], both of them have committed an abomination.” It seems clear that Paul had the Leviticus passages in mind when writing to the Corinthians. When paired with malakoi, it is almost certain that arsenokoitai refers to the active partner in a homosexual relationship. By using these terms together, Paul includes both active and passive homosexual partners within his list of those who will not inherit the kingdom of God.

Finally, in 1 Timothy 1, Paul includes arsenokoitai (translated by the ESV as “men who practice homosexuality”) on a list that includes sins (sexual and non-sexual) that do not conform to “sound doctrine” (v. 10). God’s law exposes these sins, and believers are exhorted to not participate in any activity that discredits the gospel or dishonors God (v. 11). Christians should repent of sin and pursue a life that is consistent with their new identity in Christ. It is worth noting that Paul once again presumes the Old Testament’s prohibition on homosexual relations.

Although more could be said, the New Testament does not allow for a pro-LGBT sexual ethic. Likewise, it is wrong to say that Jesus was indifferent about homosexuality. The Bible is clear about God’s design for marriage and sexuality and teaches that operating outside of God’s will only leads to pain and hurt. Thus, as June ends, we can be sure that Jesus would not have waved a rainbow flag or marched in a Pride parade. We can be equally sure that He would have ministered to those most caught up in the sexual sins of our day, speaking truth and love (Ephesians 4:15) to everyone entangled in the moral revolution.

We should do likewise.

𝑊𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑦 𝐷𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑 𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑛. 𝑃𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑.

9 notes · View notes

flwrsims4 · 2 years

Photo

COREN AND MICHAEL (He/Him; He/Him)

Some of my favourite sims I’ve made so far ! Don’t they look so cute <3 My save files are 90% dilfs because look at them.

Anywho Coren is the blond and Michael is the cutie patootie with black hair.

#sims 4 #ts4 #the sims 4 oc #ts4 oc #gay #couple #FLWRoc

5 notes · View notes

truefreethinker-blog · 2 months

Text

Rev. Michael Coren claims Jesus would wave the Pride rainbow flag

https://truefreethinker.com/rev-michael-coren-claims-jesus-would-wave-the-pride-rainbow-flag/

#MichaelCoren #Jesus #Pride #LGBTQ

0 notes

corens-relisten · 8 months

Text

MAG 26 A Distortion

SASHA JAMES?? OMG HELLO MY LOVE <33 HOW I MISSED YOU. i love how she immediately goes "yeah. if prentiss was that dangerous, martin would be dead. if hes survived, i figure id be fine" lol i love her

OMG SPOILERS!

GOOD LORD ITS MICHAEL DISTORTION!! HIIII HELLO OMG ((: i have so many drawings of this dude <33

so yes! its the Spiral! bc my love the Distortion is here (: yeah i mean michaels right that sasha doesnt rly know whats going on. plus obv some Corruption

huh what are they doing at a Corruption place though?

sasha: yeah we should really just quit lolz

oh if only they knew (:

spoilers donee

ah yes a creepy monster? i think the best method of proceeding is to stalk it! OO TIM LIKES ROBERT SMIRK? FORGOT ABT THAT THATS SO COOL!

i love the imagery of the blond seeming normal, but in reflections hes weird. just generally off-putting. love that sm (: love him so much (: YES MICHAEL. THATS NOT YOUR NAME BUT IT IS!! creepy sharp hands ((:

oo creepy Michael bringing her to a creepy worm place

i really dont remember this one. like. at all. dont recall it either. i thought creepy michael was introduced in a different ep! i wonder if i just accidentally skipped this one? its really weird. especially that i really like this ep! i dont think id just forget it

anyway, i dont think i have much else to say! so heres my offering of ml michael

i actually kinda love how he turned out ((: idk if it looks like him in glass in the background (its supposed to be a sort of reflection in the coffee shop (ik thats not how reflections work lol))

have a beautiful day!

#coren's relisten!#tma #the magnus archives #the magnus pod #the magnus archives fanart #the magnus archive fanart #michael distortion

4 notes · View notes

die-schwanenkoenigin · 3 months

Text

I want a show that's just victoria coren-mitchell making michael portillo jokes for one and a half hours

0 notes

friarmusings · 9 months

Text

Junk Mail

There was an interesting article in this morning’s news on mass mailing (a.k.a. junk mail) – its history, volume, rationale and the US Post Office’s dependence upon on it. But what was most interesting to me was a description of the means to stop the a great deal of junk mail. The article (I tried to stop my junk mail forever) was written by Michael J. Coren and appeared in the Washington…

View On WordPress

#junk #spam

0 notes

panelshowsource · 11 months

Text

britcom comedians & panel show personalities who share your sign

AQUARIUS ♒ dara ó briain • frank skinner • glenn moore • guz khan • hugh dennis • lucy porter • maisie adam • mark watson • phil wang • vic reeves

PISCES ♓ aisling bea • alan davies • dave gorman • ed gamble • jenny eclair • katy wix • michael mcintyre • rose matafeo

ARIES ♈ andy parsons • desiree burch • ed byrne • gary delaney • jamali maddix • john kearns • josh widdicombe • josie long • roisin conaty • romesh ranganathan • rory bremner

TAURUS ♉ al murray • alex brooker • catherine tate • greg davies • joe wilkinson • john robins • mae martin • milton jones • morgana robinson • rhys james • rob brydon • sally phillips • sandi toksvig • sean lock • stephen mangan

GEMINI ♊ alan carr • bob mortimer • david baddiel • fern brady • judi love • julian clary • london hughes • mel giedroyc • noel fielding • paul sinha • rich hall • richard ayoade • sara pascoe • sarah millican • shappi khorsandi • sindhu vee • tom allen

CANCER ♋ adam hills • alice levine • david mitchell • katherine ryan • harriet kemsley • ian hislop • jack whitehall • joe lycett • paul merton • peter serafinowicz • phill jupitus • rosie jones

LEO ♌ bridget christie • cariad lloyd • chris ramsey • daisy may cooper • frankie boyle • isy suttie • lee mack • jo brand • nish kumar • victoria coren mitchell

VIRGO ♍ alex horne • dane baptiste • darren harriott • ivo graham • jimmy carr • johnny vegas • lolly adefope • miles jupp • nina conti • stephen fry • sue perkins • tim key

LIBRA ♎ diane morgan • harry hill • jack dee • jon richardson • limmy • nick helm • rhod gilbert • robert webb • tiff stevenson • zoe lyons

SCORPIO ♏ angela barnes • chris addison • elis james • ellie taylor • holly walsh • liza tarbuck • jonathan ross • kerry godliman • kevin bridges • matt forde • mike wozniak • sofie hagen • susan calman

SAGITTARIUS ♐ adam riches • david o'doherty • jessica knappett • larry dean • miranda hart • richard osman • seann walsh • simon amstell • steven k. amos

CAPRICORN ♑ ahir shah • angus deayton • bill bailey • claudia winkleman • james acaster • mark lamarr • paul foot • rob beckett • suzi ruffell

#REPOSTING CUZ I ACCIDENTALLY DELETED IT HAHA #sorry i can't include every person ever but i tried to at least do everyone's faves!#a good day to be a gemini!!!#signs

126 notes · View notes