#impeachment of verdict

[charlesoberonn]

I wish this was a parody. He actually said that. He said presidents have absolute immunity and the only method to hold a president accountable for an "official act" is via a guilty verdict in an impeachment trial.

And it's even worse than "congress being cool with it". Congress can be almost entirely against it and it'll still pass (according to Trump's logic) because to achieve a guilty verdict in an impeachment trial requires a 2/3 majority vote in the senate.

So really it only takes a little over a third of the senate, which is 34 senators, to be cool with it, in order to make presidentially ordered assassination of political rivals legal (again, according to Trump).

And even worse. These 34 senators could be representing as few as 17 states and as few as 24 million people, or only 7.5% of the country.

The Court of Appeals rejected this interpretation outright, but the fact that Trump chose to present this argument and continues to spew it in his rallies is a major concern.

I know I'm preaching to the choir talking about it on Tumblr, but Trump wants to be a dictator. And the Republican Party are supporting him in this effort.

Abolish the Republican Party. They're not a legitimate political party anymore. They're a hostile fascist entity trying to overthrow America's democracy and they need to be dealt with accordingly.

#politics #trump #us politics #american politics #republican party #abolish the republican party

[wilwheaton]

The Court’s decision to hear the Trump immunity case was outrageous, legally indefensible, and handled procedurally in a way that made it clear they were no longer acting as a court, but rather as the judicial arm of the Republican Party. They took a case they should not have accepted, agreeing to hear arguments that were already rejected in an expertly argued appeals court decision. Just as damagingly, they did so in a way that—regardless of their final ruling—would mean American voters would likely not hear a verdict before November’s election. It is a dark irony. They have chosen to hear the Department of Justice’s case against Donald Trump for election interference in a way that is itself election interference.

Supreme Court Picks Up Where Jan. 6 Mob Left Off

It’s so important to understand that, at a minimum, Thomas and Kavanaugh are not jurists who fairly interpret law according to Constitutional principles.

They are political activists and operatives who are abusing the power granted to them by the Constitution they will not uphold to force upon a nation that did not elect them a set of rules and conditions that are overwhelmingly -- overwhelmingly -- opposed by Americans.

I do not respect them. They have no credibility. They are Fascists who are taking apart the entire 20th century of American Democracy as quickly as they can.

If America survives this election, SCOTUS must be reformed immediately. The Trump justices must be removed, and Thomas must be impeached, then face a trial for his bottomless corruption.

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

Representative Matt Gaetz has finally said the quiet part out loud: Republicans don’t have enough evidence to impeach and convict Joe Biden. They just want to make him look bad enough that he loses the 2024 election.

Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. Many in the GOP, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, are starting to suggest opening an impeachment inquiry into Biden so that they can access more information and witnesses that will supposedly lead them to the truth.

But Gaetz said that Republicans should go straight to impeachment proceedings, not just an inquiry. “The purpose of that impeachment, from my standpoint, is not to force a vote that loses,” he said during a Twitter Space on Monday night. “It’s to put on a trial in the Senate, and by the way, not for the sake of conviction.”

“There’s no conviction and removal of Joe Biden coming on impeachment. I know that. You know that,” Gaetz said, although he blamed that on the Senate being controlled by Democrats, not the utter lack of proof.

Gaetz argued that Republicans should impeach Biden in order to put him on trial. But “the jury is the American people.”

“If we had the Senate as the stage and the platform for James Comer to put on his evidence and advance this impeachment, it will not result in a conviction,” Gaetz said, referring to the Chair of the House Oversight Committee, who has been leading the charge against Biden.

“But the true verdict can still be rendered by the American people.”

Republicans are reportedly planning to open an impeachment inquiry into Biden in the fall. McCarthy insisted that such an inquiry would not be for political purposes, a pointed dig at the President, whom Republicans accuse of weaponizing the government to go after Donald Trump.

But all of the investigations into Biden are absolutely for political purposes. House Republicans have mobilized multiple committees to go after the Biden family. There has yet to be any proof of wrongdoing, but Republicans have used the investigations as excuses to trash Biden, attack policies they don’t like such as immigration, and share his son’s nude photos.

An impeachment inquiry, and certainly a full-on impeachment, would take that governmental weaponization to the next level.

#us politics #news #the new republic #republicans #conservatives #gop #biden administration #hunter biden #president joe biden #rep. matt gaetz #rep. kevin McCarthy #impeachment #weaponization of the government #2023 #us house of representatives

[msvelawciraptor]

Had a very satisfying trial win today. I already walked in knowing the alleged victim couldn't tell the same story twice. But this woman on the stand, in addition to making up whole new allegations out of whole cloth that she never told anyone at any time that I got to have all sorts of fun impeaching her about, told two different stories on direct about the alleged strangulation.

First she claimed that my client had put both of his hands around her neck. I heard it, the judge heard it and quoted it back to me in denying my directed verdict motion.

Then later she said that my client had actually put his forearm on her neck.

When I was crossing her about the initial statement about the hands around the neck, she said, in front of the jury, with her whole chest and both titties, that she had never said he had put his hands around her neck. She had always and only said that he had put his forearm on her neck.

I love it when they write my closing for me

#public defender

[justjokeswithtomhannigan]

Jokes 12/18/23

In Delaware this week, adrunk driver hit one of the cars in President Joe Biden’s motorcade with him just feet away from the incident. Although no one was harmed, conservative news outlets are calling the drunk driver a hero.

Two men in Montana have been charged with killing around 3,600 birds including bald eagles. The two men are claiming there’s literally nothing else to do in Montana.

Actor, Jonathan Majors, has been fired by Marvel Studios following today’s a guilty verdict in his assault and harassment trial. Without Marvel, Majors next role is expected to be "Guy who's very sorry in prison. "

Earlier this week it was revealed that Israeli soldiers killed three Israeli hostages waving a white flag by mistake because they assumed they were Palestinian. The soldiers in question are being investigated with a representative saying, “This was a tragedy, we would never knowingly commit a war crime against our own people.”

The Confederate Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery will be dismantled this week, just in time for your least favorite relative to make it his whole personality at Christmas.

Southwest Airlines will pay a 140 million dollar fine for its meltdown last year that stranded millions of passengers. Southwest Airlines promises passengers this year will be different but to be realistic because they’re still Southwest Airlines.

Earlier today, disgraced Congressman, George Santos, sat down with talk show host Ziwe for his first interview post-expulsion. In the interview, Santos surprised everyone by admitting to not knowing who James Baldwin is, instead of making up something insane.

This week the House of Representatives voted to look into impeaching President Biden. The primary charge against Biden being something about his son, maybe? No one is really sure yet.

The National Highway Traffic Safety said this week that they’re working on using technology in new cars that would detect alcohol on drivers, making white trash people everywhere nervously think to themselves, “They don’t have that yet, right?”

In a recent interview, Comedian, Ray Romano, said he wouldn’t want to do a reboot of Everyone Loves Raymond because reboots are never as good as the original, also half the main cast is dead.

#jokes #news #monologue

[pipelinelaserraygun]

In order to check out this 🆓 archive, LITERALLY an Intel cache in the thousands, ADD the Tumblr app.

--In December 2023 thus far (scroll right below 📜👇🏼), I've provided you analysis of the 📖 Ten Commandments.

Today, a look at the 1st one.

I took a refresher look 👀 at HOW #1 differs FROM #2.

#1) Nothing is to be a priority higher than REVERENCE, when kneeling before the ONE 🕎🛐 Creator of ALL.

#2) No idols can replace God.

The White House is a 👺💩 temporary throne that was currently obtained because of election 🗳️ irregularities.

IT 🛫 WAS 👿🛬 HIJACKED.

This impacts adherence to the Second commandment: Levels of intolerance towards sin are RAISED by proximity.

Acts of sin are 🤮📴-ensive to the Creator of ALL, it goes WITHOUT saying. They are bad enough on their OWN.

🐽 Practice of desecration: the carrying out of deliberate AUDACITY, AT A PLACE 👣 where (altar-FOOTSTOOL) God should be revered, is the equivalent of thumbing one's NOSE at Creation, reaching 🆕 lows.

It's like saying "piss 📴 ", to YOUR 🕎 MAKER. The hands of 👺👺 satan's earthbound political appointed governing bodies operate as if there are no repercussions.

"Deference to magistrates" is the key word from the FIRST commandment: God doesn't defer to ⚖️👎🏼 lower courts.

"They have turned the light of my dad's 'love' into darkness."

--👺 hunter biden

"What about the light of love FROM our Dad/Father in Heaven 🕎?

When your dad is the literal General Zod/💤 sleepy joe, there can ONLY be 1 verdict.

"Deference to magistrates" is the key word from the FIRST commandment: God doesn't defer to ⚖️👎🏼 lower courts.

When they do right-by-God, the lower courts will receive the Lord's blessings.

Championing those causes nearest and dearest to the ✝️ Son of God, including the never-ending battle for truth and justice, FINDS FAVOR.

Lower courts showing 🕎🛐 DEFERENCE 🎯 TO GOD still make a huge difference.

[klbmsw]

[dialogue-queered]

9 June 2023

James Risen

Extract 1: The Republican Party has devolved into a cult of personality, where every new piece of evidence of their leader’s criminality becomes another reason for his followers to defend him. Donald Trump has now been indicted twice in just over two months, in separate cases involving accusations of unrelated crimes. Both times, Republicans have rallied around him. The group of whiners and weaklings who are running against Trump for next year’s Republican presidential nomination are so intimidated by his hold on the party’s base that they are afraid to publicly tell the truth, which is that Trump is a thug who should be in prison instead of the White House.

Extract 2: In 2021, the Washington Post’s fact-checking team concluded that Trump had made 30,573 false or misleading claims over the four years of his presidency.

Extract 3: Will four criminal indictments, a wide-ranging civil fraud case, a civil sexual abuse and defamation verdict, two impeachments, a stalled obstruction of justice case, and 30,573 lies be enough to wake up Republicans?

#The Intercept #Donald Trump #2023 #GOP #US #us politics #James Risen

[marta-bee]

I’m tailspinning a bit over the prospect of Trump being a likely presidential candidate again. If politics isn’t your thing feel free to keep scrolling.

It’s the CNN townhall that really brought me to the crisis-point here. Before I felt a sort of hazy denial that took the edge off a bit; but seeing him on that stage and in that context made it much less deniable. He’s still spewing hateful ideas, but not, like, excessively hateful for the American Right. National abortion ban? Nothing much new there. Reinstate family separation? Da. Pushing for a default on the debt ceiling? GOP Congressmen are already there or we wouldn’t be talking about it. It’s upsetting just how normal that all feels, but at this point there’s very little that was genuinely surprising there.

What’s really upsetting (and I fully admit this is my privilege showing through, that I have the luxury of dreading these higher-level things) is how much we know he’s a liar, how bogged down in scandal he is. And really, “scandal” is hardly sufficient when there are indictments and civil-court verdicts and multiple impeachments on the books. People who support Trump aren’t all idiots; they know he’s lying and morally compromised and just corrupt as hell. At this point, it seems like that’s the main selling point: that through sheer chutzpah he’s decided facts don’t apply to him, and he’s somehow gotten reality to conform to that. That comes across as strength to a lot of people. That what the “elites” say --even when they’re right-- just doesn’t matter for him.

And that’s what’s making the bile raise in my throat this week. Because the thought that so many of my fellow Americans are attracted to that kind of immunity, that they don’t want well-reasoned debates and convincing or being convinced even in the abstract feels harrowing? It’s a direct challenge to a big part of my identity.

It’s also probably been true for a while now, and this is more about illusions being ripped away than anything objectively changing. Still, it’s scary and it hurts.

Anywho. Back to your normally-scheduled blorbage. I think I just needed to put that feeling in writing.

#politics #marta blathers

[madamspeaker]

I see there is the usual “Blame Pelosi” horseshit happening this morning as excerpts from a book by a couple of Politico staffers get released. The gist seems to be, as framed by The Intercept (the double whammy of dodgy reporting there - Politico and The Intercept) that Nancy blocked impeaching Trump that very night of the insurrection, and therefore it is entirely her fault that the Republicans eventually chickened out of a guilty verdict when he was impeached. They just seem to ignore that McConnell gavelled out the Senate that night as soon as the vote certification was done, and unlike the Speaker, he didn’t bring that chamber back until after the inauguration. They also just casually ignore the fact that by nearly 4am (when the certification was done), everyone was exhausted - and that as Speaker, Nancy was probably thinking just as much about her deeply traumatised and shattered staff as anyone else. It’s very easy to look back in hindsight and say this and that should have been done, but when you have just survived a fucking insurrection and an assassination attempt, maybe you can be forgiven for thinking that the best thing for everyone is to go home for a couple of hours and see loved ones. Trump was impeached within the week afterall, and during that week the Speaker was perhaps doing more than anyone else to ensure that the country remained safe from a mad man (never ever forget, the next morning she called Milley about Trump’s access to nukes).

I just find it remarkable that we are being presented with a narrative in which the Republicans are absolved of complete blame in their failure to find Trump guilty all because Nancy Pelosi didn’t plough on with an impeachment that very night. Give me a fucking break. The fact that 2/3 of the House GOP voted to decertify the election that very night tells you that no matter how quick Nancy moved on impeachment, the rot was already there in the other side, and McConnell gavelling out the Senate for over two weeks is actually the critical factor in the timing -- but Mitch as always gets a pass.

Just realised, but of course The Intercept shite was written by Ryan Grim. It’s always one of the Ryan turds.

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil Supreme Court strikes down ruling benefiting pro-Bolsonaro lawmaker who spread election disinformation

A panel of Supreme Court justices overturned a decision by Justice Nunes Marques, who last week benefited an impeached pro-Bolsonaro lawmaker.

Justice Marques had saved former Paraná state lawmaker Fernando Francischini, who used social media to question the security of Brazil’s voting system. In October, the Superior Electoral Court had removed him from office for the remarks, in a verdict that was considered a landmark precedent for dealing with misinformation on social media.

A 3-2 majority struck down the injunction.

Continue reading.

#brazil #brazilian politics #politics #free speech #democracy #misinformation #supreme federal court #fernando francischini #mod nise da silveira #image description in alt

[wilwheaton]

A Trump appointee with little experience on the bench, Cannon was then randomly assigned to preside over the criminal case when Trump was indicted in June. Meanwhile, a string of errors she’s made in her short time as a judge has come to light. Her most recent hiccup came in June, when she closed jury selection in a child pornography case—denying the defendant’s family and others a seat in the courtroom to watch jury selection. The misstep, an apparent violation of the constitutional right to a public trial, nearly invalidated the proceedings entirely. She also neglected to swear in a prospective jury pool—a mandatory procedure. Cannon, 42, was appointed by Trump in the waning days of his presidency in 2020. She’d been a federal prosecutor for seven years, but has only been a part of eight criminal trials that resulted in jury verdicts—four as a prosecutor and four as a judge. She’s spent a total of just 14 days in trial as a federal judge, The New York Times reported.

Judge Aileen Cannon Comes Out Swinging in Trump’s Favor (Again) in Classified Docs Case

Cannon was deemed UNQUALIFIED by the American Bar Association. In her FOURTEEN DAYS of activity on the bench, she’s confirmed that, over and over again.

This political operative masquerading as a federal judge is a disgrace. She needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

In his first interview since he was acquitted over the weekend in a historic impeachment trial, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) lashed out at the Biden administration and the Lone Star State’s House Speaker Dade Phelan (R) over his impeachment and trial.

“So you think that the effort to remove you from office really came from the Biden administration?” commentator Tucker Carlson asked Paxton in the interview, posted to the platform X.

“I really do,” Paxton said, adding that he thinks “that’s where it was instigated.”

The Attorney General alleged that the impeachment was a way to get him “out of the way” after he filed lawsuits against the administration.

Paxton, who had been suspended from his post since the Texas House voted to impeach him earlier this year, was acquitted by a jury of state senators over the weekend on all 16 articles of impeachment he faced.

Paxton had been accused of misusing the powers of his office to aid a friend and campaign donor, but after more than a week of witness testimony before the senators, none of the articles of impeachment received the two-thirds votes required to convict.

Paxton and his allies have decried the proceedings as politically motivated. In a statement after the verdict, he bashed the “sham impeachment” and “the weaponization of the impeachment process to settle political differences.”

The Attorney General has also taken aim at Republican Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, and told Carlson that the lawmaker is “controlled by the Democrats.”

“I don’t think he particularly has an ideology. He’s like, ‘I want to stay in power. I’ve cut this deal to be Speaker with Democrats,'” Paxton alleged of Phelan.

Though other Paxton allies have also piled criticism onto the Texas House for the impeachment, Phelan has stood by the effort.

The Speaker said in a statement after the verdict that it’s “unfortunate” the impeachment process resulted in returning control of the Texas AG’s office “to an individual who, I believe, clearly abused his power, compromised his agency and its employees, and moved mountains to protect and benefit himself.”

#us politics #news #the hill #republicans #conservatives #texas #biden administration #president joe biden #impeachment #ken paxton #Dade Phelan #tucker carlson #x #twitter #Texas House of Representatives #2023

[valkyriesexual]

Hi!

I'm in law school and really fascinated to see how this case plays out. I was wondering if you knew why the UK trial isn't mentioned. I saw somewhere that the judge says it was shoddy and there wasn't enough evidence, but that doesn't seem right especially because it survived two appeals.

I was also wondering whether you think the judge would grant summary judgment or JNOV at the end of arguments. It seems like she should since the article clearly said nothing about JD, but I'm really looking for someone with a legal background to talk to about it and I can't go to professors until after finals lol

I think the ruling was basically correct, which was that the findings from the UK case weren't binding on this case, because the legal standards - for defamation/admissible evidence/definitions of conduct that constitutes DV - in the US vs UK are very different. It wasn't that the UK verdict was based on shoddy evidence. It's just that AH will have to present evidence that's admissible under VA law to meet VA legal standards, which may be different than in the UK. But the transcripts are being used for impeachment and stuff so it's not entirely unmentioned.

summary judgment was requested earlier and denied (prob for civ pro reasons I don't remember).

judge could do jnov post verdict, but based on her conduct thus far, it doesn't seem likely that she'd overturn a jury's verdict for depp via jnov.

happy to answer qs. Good luck w exams!!

#answered #lawblr #depp v. heard

[dankusner]

POLITICS 

Cruz podcast ads fuel super PAC 

BP America backs out after hearing of contributions 

WASHINGTON — A super PAC focused on getting U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz reelected has received hundreds of thousands of dollars tied to advertising revenue from Cruz’s “Verdict” podcast, an unusual campaign finance arrangement that raises legal questions. 

Public scrutiny of the payments could prompt advertisers to follow BP America Inc.’s lead and redirect their business to avoid indirectly supporting the Texas Republican’s effort to win a third six-year term.

BP America, based in Cruz’s hometown of Houston, said it was unaware that ad revenue from the podcast was flowing to a pro-Cruz organization. 

“We purchase advertising on iHeart based on the potential audience and do not specify by podcasts,” BP America spokesperson Ross Parman said. “We were never informed that media spend was going directly to a super PAC and have instructed iHeart to remove our messages from any podcasts that direct advertising revenue to campaigns, PACs or political parties.” 

Since March 2023, the pro-Cruz Truth and Courage PAC has received a series of increasingly larger payments from iHeartMedia Management Services Inc. that total more than $630,000. 

Rachel Nelson, spokesperson for iHeart subsidiary Premiere Networks, said in a statement that Cruz volunteers his time to host the podcast and isn’t compensated for it. 

Nelson said Premiere sells advertising time for “Verdict,” as it does for other podcasts, and the money being directed to the Truth and Courage PAC is “associated with those advertising sales.” 

Truth and Courage 

Nelson referred additional questions to the PAC, which does not provide contact information on its website. 

A committee campaign finance filing includes an email address, but inquiries sent to it were not answered. 

The PAC has supported various Republican candidates in the past, including former Dallas Cowboys running back Herschel Walker in his failed 2022 bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Georgia.

Its website is now dominated by photos and press releases boosting Cruz and attacking his opponent in the November election, U.S. Rep. Colin Allred, D-Dallas. 

“Truth and Courage PAC’s focus is ensuring that Ted Cruz is re-elected to the United States Senate in 2024,” according to the site. 

In response to questions about the podcast and the financial arrangements surrounding it, the Cruz campaign provided a written statement characterizing all of the attention as “lazy attacks” by news outlets and Democrats in an election year. 

“Senator Cruz appears on Verdict three times a week for free. 

He does this to pull back the veil on the corrupt inner workings of Washington — none of which ever get fairly covered,” according to the statement. “How convenient that the mainstream media and the cogs in the machine of the Biden-Pelosi Democrat Party want this to stop.” 

The campaign did not say who decided podcast advertising revenue should be directed to the PAC. 

Growing the podcast 

The podcast started during former President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial in early 2020, with Cruz offering his take on those proceedings and sharing behind-the-scenes observations. 

It was a hit and has continued to attract a significant audience for Cruz’s conservative perspective, sprinkled with occasional sports banter and pop culture references. 

The senator announced the move to iHeart in 2022, saying at the time that it was a “big damn deal” to partner with the No. 1 syndicator of U.S. radio programming. 

He credited the network with helping make the career of conservative giant Rush Limbaugh. 

Recent “Verdict” episodes have included advertisements for large companies with well-known brands: BP, Safeway, Consumer Cellular, Carvana, Lexus and UberEats among them. 

One recent advertisement on the podcast was paid for by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 

The ad urges people to check if they are eligible for income-based subsidies for Medicare prescription drug coverage after that program was expanded as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Cruz opposed that legislation and has strongly criticized it on his podcast. 

His “Verdict” co-host Ben Ferguson typically reads promotional material during the podcast touting companies such as Patriot Mobile and Blackout Coffee. 

Blackout Coffee promotes itself as an “anti-woke” coffee brand, while Grapevine-based Patriot Mobile says it is “America’s only Christian conservative wireless provider.” 

Patriot Mobile has worked through a political action committee to promote conservative causes and support like-minded candidates in Tarrant County suburban school board races. 

“Verdict” episodes have been posted with accompanying video at times on YouTube, although the most recent episode on the channel this week was a couple of months old. 

In addition to the money from iHeart, campaign finance reports for Truth and Courage also show digital revenue payments — albeit in the relatively small amount of about $4,000 total — from Google, which owns YouTube.

Cruz has a ubiquitous media presence.

In addition to the podcast, he appears often on cable news and posts frequently on social media. 

He has written several books, which he promotes across his platforms. 

His most recent financial disclosure statement includes a 2022 agreement with Regnery Publishing for a two-book deal with a $1.1 million advance, payable in four installments. 

Legal questions When Cruz announced iHeart’s involvement with the podcast, it quickly attracted criticism and raised questions about whether such a partnership was allowed. 

The Campaign Legal Center wrote to the Senate Ethics Committee in late 2022 urging an investigation into the arrangement. 

The group noted the millions iHeart spends on lobbying, including on issues that fall within the jurisdiction of the Senate Commerce Committee, where Cruz is the top Republican. 

The CLC said iHeart agreeing to bankroll the podcast appeared to violate the letter and the spirit of laws that restrict lobbyist gifts to senators. 

The Ethics Committee disagreed, saying by letter that it had reviewed the matter and determined Cruz “did not violate federal law, Senate rules or standards of conduct.” 

The stream of payments from iHeart to the super PAC raises fresh questions and could prompt a look by the Federal Election Commission. 

Independent super PACs are barred from coordinating with candidates and campaigns they support. 

Candidates are limited in how much money they can solicit for super PACs and are prohibited from soliciting corporate donations to them, said campaign finance lawyer Brett Kappel. 

It’s “pretty odd” to have advertising revenue from a politician’s podcast going to a super PAC, Kappel said. 

Cruz has said he’s an uncompensated volunteer, but that does not explain why iHeart would direct advertising money to a super PAC that supports his reelection, Kappel said. “It kind of strains credulity that this is an arm’s length agreement in which Sen. Cruz has no personal involvement,” Kappel said.

#Youtube

[occupyhades]

God’s Whistleblower

The eyes of the LORD are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good. Proverbs 15:3 (ESV)

So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? Luke 16:11 (NIV)

When the sentence for a crime is not speedily executed, the hearts of men become fully set on doing evil. Ecclesiastes 8:11 (BSB)

What are worthless and wicked people like? They are constant liars. Proverbs 6:12 (NLT) 

No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who tells lies shall stand in my presence. Psalm 101:7 (BSB) 

“Why are you so afraid?” He asked. “Do you still have no faith?” Mark 4:40 (BSB)

"Are they ashamed of their detestable conduct? No, they have no shame at all; they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen; they will be brought down when they are punished," says the LORD. Jeremiah 8:12 (NIV) 

And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne. And there were open books, and one of them was the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their deeds, as recorded in the books. Apocalypse 20:12 (BSB)

#apocalypse #god #holy spirit #judgement #damnation