#i think janet wertman admitted she did that because she wanted her to have a female confidante and knew it was fictional

[fideidefenswhore]

Although Elizabeth [Seymour] had served Queen Anne Boleyn, she had not been included in her sister’s household. In March 1537 Lady Ughtred had written to the Lord Privy Seal from York to “be holpen to obtain of the king’s grace to be farmer of one of these abbeys if they fortune to go down …” The young widow’s connections were not lost on the minister: he proposed instead that she marry his son and heir, Gregory, an offer to which she readily agreed.

The Rediscovery of Elizabeth Seymour, by Teri Fitzgerald

#god i want to know more about her . #she's often included in jane's household in fiction tho for some reason #i think janet wertman admitted she did that because she wanted her to have a female confidante and knew it was fictional #i know jane wasn't queen for long so it might have been partly from that but it doesn't really seem like she had any... friends? #which is sad. it's a horse of a different color i know (i think it was loades that said it's hard to imagine her being 'constrained' #to play the other woman/mistress [and be hated for that] and i agree]) #(for the length that anne had to by circumstance) #but even as anne was dealing with hostility from catherine's household she does seem to have at least had friends and female relatives that #were a sort of support system...it doesn't really seem like jane had anyone save her brothers