#but i've seen time and time again how sakura “won” against ino because sasuke is prettier than sai

[leportraitducadavre]

this sure needs more study but i think a big part of the problem with the "stans" of some female characters is that they hide behind the term "feminist" when their real interest is to prove their self-insert is "desirable". i mostly notice this particular behavior in the "shipper" portion of these fandoms, as the "wives" status of certain characters is measured based on how beautiful/powerful their husbands are. many of these shippers think that having a husband (specifically a handsome one) is proof that the female character of their choice is attractive and therefore "beautiful" because, let's face it, desirability is all this boils down to; even their need to show how "powerful" or "strong" they are (often by providing examples of how "superior" their fav is to other female characters) is more about them being recognized, admired, and desired by the male characters.

#this is not to say that some of the defenses they provide are likely a response to misoginistic comments made by the fandom #but i've seen time and time again how sakura “won” against ino because sasuke is prettier than sai #or how hinata is more important than sakura because she's the hokage's wife #and let's admit that both things are stupid to be proud of #sakura was able to pester sasuke to marrying her #yet she wasn't able to get a miserable kiss #and hinata needed a genjutsu for the man she confessed her love to notice her #i mean #you think he'll remember the time you almost became hyuga paste. he wasn't traumatized enough apparently #anti sasusaku #anti ss #anti naruhina #anti nh #anti sasusaku fandom #anti naruhina fandom

[madara-fate]

Hi, so I haven't read the manga and you always answer with facts not opinions so I wanna ask you these: The other day I was thru a blog that claims that ino actually won the fight against sakura, and that the only reason why sakura could set free from ino's jutsu was that ino's chakra was very waste at the time, is that true? Sorry if you already answer that.

Besides I wanna to ask you if you think it's fair to compare ino with sakura, cause is something that i've seen lately, personally as much as I like ino I think it's quite dumb because ino is a backup character, she doesn't really get a development does she? I mean she's a secure and strong girl at the begining and at the end she's a secure and strong woman, while sakura gets a lot of development regarding his shiness as a kid and a whole involment with the protagonists, we actually get to see how sakura grows, changes and matures as she is the lead woman.

And lastly i'm so sorry this is more extense that what I expected. Do you think that sakura good chakra control made her trainning with tsunade "easier", cause again many people claims that somehow she had this gift where she had amazing control that eventually lead her to awaken the byakugou, and that the claim that she had no special hability is a lie since she had that, against characters like lee who actually had nothing, they even say things like shizune didn't had that hability and that's the reason why she doesn't have the seal.

I was thru a blog that claims that Ino actually won the fight against Sakura, and that the only reason why Sakura could set free from Ino's jutsu was that Ino's chakra was very waste at the time, is that true?

That's the stupidest excuse I've ever heard. Sakura's chakra was just as depleted as Ino's was, so they were on an even playing field. Therefore, if a full strength Ino would have used that technique on a full strength Sakura, the result would have been the same. The shit these people come up with sometimes I swear to god. It's like all logic and reason just escapes them when they're trying to find these ridiculous excuses to downplay and hate on Sakura for no reason.

I wanna to ask you if you think it's fair to compare Ino with Sakura

It depends on what comparison you're making. If you're comparing her panel time or role in the story, then yes it's rather unfair because that's directly influenced by Sakura's status as a main character, which goes beyond the confines of the actual story. In such cases, it would only be fair to compare her with the other mains, and the consensus when doing so is that Sakura got majorly shafted when compared with Naruto and Sasuke.

However, if you're comparing combat skills or any other topics that are dictated by the confines of the story, then any comparisons between any characters are acceptable.

Do you think that Sakura's good chakra control made her training with Tsunade "easier"

No it didn't make Sakura's training any easier. That's like saying how Naruto's training with Kakashi and Yamato to learn the RasenShuriken was made "easier" due to his large reserves of chakra, but that's not the case - His training was made possible because of that, but it wasn't made easier. He still had to work extremely hard, night and day to learn that technique. Nothing about it was easy. Similarly, Sakura's immaculate chakra control made unlocking the Byakugou Seal possible, but it didn't make her training easier. In fact, her training with Tsunade didn't have anything to do with the seal. The majority of it was teaching Sakura the super strength taijutsu, and refining her skills of evasion, and Tsunade beat the living shit out of Sakura on a daily basis to teach her the hard way.

Then they went and compared her to Lee by saying how he was someone "who actually had nothing", but what are they trying to imply here? That Sakura had things handed to her on a silver platter because of her talent with chakra control? So pathetic, honestly.

#Sakura Haruno #Ino Yamanaka