#but also im sorry if its just a hotfix bug

[animentality]

Did they get a postive response from adding those Gortash lines? I thought a bunch of people hateing on it instead? Also what if they removed the lines to change them a go a diffrent direction. I'm sorry. I have a lot of worry they wont do something I agee with.

The overwhelming reaction was positive. Durgetash artists went on Twitter to celebrate, and the small but passionate fans of the ship went nuclear here and on Twitter, and helped BG3 trend, yada yada, tale as old as time.

Most people don't care about Durgetash or Gortash. The majority of people you hear from would be the people who like both of those things. It's also a small ship.

The haters of that ship are even smaller in comparison, because the hand that reaches out will always touch more than the hand clenched into a fist.

And the only "legitimate" complainers, who don't just dislike the ship on principle, are the whiners who keep insisting their durges are lesbians, and how dare Larian "force" them into a relationship with a man - which is literally not what Larian did.

No one bitches about how Gale's ORIGIN completely precludes him from being gay.

I see no reason why you can't similarly have Durge's ORIGIN make them attracted to men. Or, you know. Enver is special.

Oh. And also. It's so fucking platonic, if you want it to be. Stop being stupid and just say you don't like Durgetash. It's as easy as that.

Stop using "lesbophobic" as a handy label for your self righteous soapbox. You just don't like the ship, and that's fine. It's FINE. But acting like Durgetash is lesbophobic - oh, go play a Tav.

And also, Astarion and Gale and Wyll better not flirt with you in game, even though you can tell them to fuck off, or else they're lesbophobic too.

That's the only discourse that gained traction on Twitter. As far as I know.

If Larian had made Gale wear blackface or something, and people got pissed, then yeah. They'd back up on that, and get rid of it pronto.

But Durgetash???

Aside from the general evil antics, they're not that fucking controversial of a ship.

Most people don't even PLAY the Dark Urge.

I don't know how to stress this any other way...

People act like Durgetashers are loud - we're honestly not that loud.

Astarion fans are far louder, and yet, the most romanced companion is SHADOWHEART and then Laezel and KARLACH.

He's not even in the top 3. And yet, he dominates the content on Twitter and Tumblr... he's definitely more popular than Gortash or the Dark Urge or Durgetash together...but his fans are still technically the damn minority.

So Durgetash in comparison to Starries???

Infinitesimal.

And Durgetash haters?

Would be even smaller.

So what I'm saying is...

I'm kind of tired of answering asks about this.

I don't KNOW for certain whether or not this is Larian backing up or walking forward, and while I don't believe they'd walk back on this, and especially not for a handful of people, it kind of annoys me to even think about things outside of my control.

now if Larian makes a big grand statement and says actually we totally rescind something WE WROTE AND ADDED TO THE GAME because some people got mad...then I'll call them cucks, and complain.

But as of right now?

As far as I know personally, and assume in my heart... it's neutral.

The lines are probably just bugged. Also, not ALL of them are bugged either, so.

Please stop freaking out, guys.

I am the world's biggest resident durgetash freak, and I'm shrugging at this, and just saying it's a bug.

Don't let it bother you. It's out of your control, regardless.

(And I stress again - if we find out they're legitimately backing away from something they did...they have the spine of a ham sandwich. But until we know that for sure, I won't condemn them for this, because as far as we know, it is legitimately an accident.)

#durgetash #please stop asking me about this #i dont know what you want from me #i just dont think theyre walking back on it #peartree was totally different #after this addition too #even if they do alter lines i just believe its still going to be durgetash coded anyway #although if theyre changing them so soon lmao cuz theyre embarrassed and want to make them a little less #idk cheesy maybe #then damn larian you have no self esteem #stick to your fucking guns #dont you stand by your own writing at all #stop letting fans change how you write #grow a fucking spine #if youre gonna add durgetash then add durgetash #if youre gonna remove it then go ahead and be a bitch and remove the only character you bothered to give gortash #but dont sneak back and try to edit shit that you already sent out #but also im sorry if its just a hotfix bug #then this is me being mean for no reason and i apologize

[bedlamgames]

Q&A #46

Today among others which priestess is which, the chastity infestation, and bearded ladies. 

Anonymous: For some reason, when you successfully biomancy a slave from male to female, the game is not properly detecting the change. It is picking up the name change and some other things such as that it should be calculating breast size of value now. The problem is that facial features are not being updated which results in some weird things such as the new slave still having a rakish mustache. Finally it keeps sissification as an option and lesbian training is not available at all.

Just checked and yet it should update their look which I’ve just fixed. The training is something I’ve purposefully not got to yet, as I want to have a Girly Girl path for former males who have also been through sissy training. Not sure when I’ll get to it but it’s definitely planned. 

Anonymous: I created male slaver and did chose sisterhood trait but game gave me a female name and "Lady" title.

Please could you let me know which race/start you chose, and whether it was full custom or the standard start. If full custom could you let me know what traits/options you took. 

Anonymous: would you give as the passwords for your rags game so we might make mods? i wanted to mod no haven but its password protected

I used to leave them entirely unprotected. Then an unpleasant example of why we can’t have nice things happened which greatly upset me and now I don’t. Unfortunately modding is not something I’m interested in allowing. Sorry about that.  

Still feel free to let me know what you planned to do and if I like it I might make it an option or scenario. 

Anonymous: Bit of a bug report. Started with a Strong Right-Arm, former owner. The first slave I got, I applied a chastity cage to. Now, for some reason, it's acting as though my Second-in-command is in chastity, as she's getting "upset by another day trapped in chastity", however, nowhere on her examine sheet can I see any mention of chastity. I removed the chastity cage and now both my second-in-command and another slaver are complaining about chastity.

If you do have the play through can you let me know what the number next to the second-in-command and the slave is on the stats page. If not what race were you and had you lost/gained any slavers before getting that slave?

Anonymous: Supply Run Anon here again. Sorry it took so long, but I've had a crazy couple of weeks! Here's some imgur pics detailing my problem. /EZ37VfK /dBXFn15 /s8gjFfI /lxGgJZH /VZOSQhx Reminder, this happened in version 0.7401-hotfix in the Heretic Convent senario. Keep up the good work!

Thanks man!

Anonymous: Is there something to reduce breast size? When I use biomancy in a slave sometimes he grows breasts, and maybe even myself, and Im into male characters, so i keep refreshing the game all the time.

Not yet but it’s planned content when I add more options to biomancy. 

Anonymous: is there more to the priestess in the town or is it just for fun?

Depends which priestess you mean as there are three of them. The more common one dedicated to Shallya and the two more secretive one, and yes they all can have an effect. 

Anonymous: ensnared rose no additional slave requests after the first delivery?

Will check it out, thank you. 

#Q&A