Tumgik
#and there was that paint.net plugin that existed since 2011.
loveletterworm · 1 year
Text
Ok this post was delayed because i was sitting next to my cat because she was lonely and then i fell asleep (peaceful world) but the thing about WebP. WebP is a COMPLETELY FINE FILE FORMAT, in fact, its compression leads to much smaller file sizes than PNGs, which means that pages using WebP images load MUCH faster on bad connections than they would if they used PNG files! This is a good thing! Objective good! (they are called "Web"ps because they are for the web!)
The issue with it is that somehow their adoption is extremely lopsided, so they're EVERYWHERE online, but it's disproportionately inaccessible to create or edit one without having to go through a bunch of file converters that will probably lead to data degradation if you have to keep going through them. So the real question is "Why is almost every program apparently so opposed to adding support/export options for a now extremely widespread image format that's existed since 2010????" Like you have had time? Why does trying to open a webp on my computer open Microsoft Edge instead of the photo viewer. What excuse could there possibly be for this.
10 notes · View notes
loveletterworm · 1 year
Text
Anyway fuck you. Paint.net plugin for WebP support which has existed since 2011 and is still actively updated. Never whinge about it being "sooo impossible to open these files and whoever came up with it should be killed" in my presence again
11 notes · View notes