Tumgik
#a BOAT name. his/her majesty's ship. the NAVY. not relationship.
moinsbienquekaworu · 1 year
Text
Okay whose names sound cool, I need someone to draw. We've got:
Ambitious aka Amy
Constant aka Con
Industrious aka Dusa
Steadfast aka Ed
Vigilant aka Gillian
Majestic aka Jasper (formerly Triumphant or Phil(?))
Ingenious aka Jen (formerly Audacious or Daisy)
Glorious aka Laurent
Observant aka Linda (short for Belinda) (formerly Meticulous)
Illustrious aka Luce
Innovative aka Nova
Spirited aka Pilar
Sharp who will use Shaun if they need a "real name"
Conscientious aka Siobhan (formerly Courteous)
Superb aka Sue (my girl Léonie)
Temeraire aka Tem (my boy Ambrose)
Some of these nicknames are more creative than others but what do you want.
3 notes · View notes
fyeahmeninroyalnavy · 3 years
Text
A Letter to the Forester Estate and the Writers of Horatio Hornblower, the TV Series
This is my letter from Horatio Hornblower and the fans of Archie Kennedy to the CS Forester Estate and also the Hornblower writers who killed off Archie Kennedy and then discarded him as if he meant nothing, particularly to Horatio. You may see their relationship as platonic or not. This is nothing against Lieutenant Bush who is a lovely man and a compelling character.
So, you think I’m such a heartless bastard that I could just move on without my best friend who gave up his good name for me to spare my “now purposeless” life? A life without my sun to my moon?
He’s probably still warm as he’s taken to a pauper’s grave or worse and I’m given a fucking promotion and a ship! I just lost my dearest friend, my brother in arms, my companion to whom I could
communicate without words, and he to me. The man I silently vowed to protect from that evil bastard Simpson. The man whose face I tenderly caressed as he writhed in fits, or nightmares, who I carried through the rain, begged to live, to drink. Whose bedside I sat vigil at, watching over him, feeding him, helping him to grow stronger. Because I said it myself. “I can’t do this without you. I won’t make it.”
Never mind that my men gave me hell, most of them anyway. We weren’t going anywhere without Archie and he would not be left behind. I would not, could not fail him again.
When I had to hit my friend in the head as he fitted, agony was clearly written on my face. And my heart broke as I saw the jolly boat drifting away taking a piece of my soul along with it.
And of course there’s more. Perhaps you didn’t notice how Archie and I called one another by our Christian names. And that he inspired courage, light, and greatness in me that I never knew I had. I was just a scared, awkward, seasick little boy that first day, thrust into the bowels of a Hell I never knew existed. And there was that bright faced animated ray of sunshine cheering me on. “Jump! You’ll be allright.” Then grinning at my no doubt green hue, “Welcome to Purgatory!”
How he still had such cheer and optimism after all he had been through on that hell ship is difficult to understand. After all, he was just a boy as well, only months older than me. And he had been on that ship far longer. Only later, after getting to know just what sort of person my dear Archie was would I understand.
Because there is, “was” no one else like him on this earth. I would have been entirely unmanned and crushed to bits had I endured what he had. I will never have that sort of courage, resilience and optimism, and I’ll never love anyone again now that he’s gone.
It is all I can do merely to get through a single hour, let alone a day. My soul is in agony without him and I look forward to my own death.
End of Part One.
Part Two
Did the writers not notice how very close Archie was to me? Because the viewers damned sure did! Any chance we had to gently touch or comfort one another, we took advantage of. When I returned from the hole in El Ferrol, Archie couldn’t get to me quickly enough. He was so loving, and concerned, and even stroked my chest. If the viewers took it as we couldn’t keep our hands to ourselves, then they would be right.
And my loyal Archie went back to the prison hell he had been in, not even fully recovered to show his faith in me, his respect, and his love.
Then there was the disaster that was Muzillac. I believe that’s when I realized there was no going back.
I was so proud of my new Lieutenant’s uniform. I actually began to feel worthy of my promotion. And Archie was obviously just as pleased. I saw that look in his warm blue eyes. The look of love and something more. He’d had a drink you see and as he began admiring my new uniform I realized he was flirting with me. And I flirted back!
Neither of us knew what was coming as we escorted Moncoutant and his men to Quiberon. But as always we would have one another’s back. And if one of us should falter, the other would be there for support.
As it came to pass, it was my dear still wounded Archie who held me up, indeed saved my life at the end. My brother in arms serving as acting Lieutenant in his Majesty’s Royal Navy, not truly recovered from El Ferrol or from the terrible abuse from that scab Simpson, would rise to the occasion for me. Indeed risked his very life without hesitation to save mine.
He was still bantering with me in the beginning as he always did, loving nothing more than to tease and annoy me. Knowing I wasn’t fond of horses, let alone using them as transportation, I saw the sparkle in his eye, the smirk of his lips as I struggled to mount the beast. Secretly I enjoyed the teasing and we both knew it. Anything to get that sunshine smile from him was always worth it to me.
Is it not evident to anyone with eyes and two brain cells how well the two of us understand and care for one another?
Then came the turning point. When Archie became what he was always meant to be. A hero.
After all Archie had been through so recently with being in prison and the events preceding it, he struggled with anxiety about the situation we found ourselves in. I tried to make light of things to reassure him but I don’t believe he was buying it. Still he remained with our men, doing the best he could while I was off playing the gallant hero. I‘m not sure what I was doing or why. Yes I had a crush on Mariette. Yes, I wanted information from her about our enemy. Maybe I was trying to find a ray of sunshine in a black cloud of misery; a failed mission of pain, grief, and loss of life. If not for Archie I would be among the losses.
Acting Lieutenant Archie Kennedy. The man was a true hero. He was there for his men and led them in spite of his fear and panic.
Then he came through for me in a big way. He saved my life.
Archie agonized about lighting the fuse to blow up the bridge in Muzillac. His voice had a slight break when speaking to Matthews about whether I was still alive or not. He kept delaying and hesitating, hoping I would show. Eventually Matthews offered to take on that burden, lighting the fuse himself.
When I suddenly appeared with Mariette over the hill, Archie sprung into action immediately. Holding fire of our marines and asking for protection of us both as Mariette was suddenly shot. As I fell to pieces and the fuse came closer to blowing up not just the bridge but me along with it, Archie bravely broke into a run, arriving to pull my weeping form away from Mariette and certain death. He put his arms about me, gently saying there was nothing more to be done for her, and pulling me away as we ran for our very lives, barely escaping. He provided comfort with an arm around me, empathetic looks and touches. As we made it back to the Indefatigable and I was called to brief Captain Pellew, my dearest friend looked at me and lovingly touched my arm. It will all be okay Horatio he said without words. End of Part Two
Part Three to follow
35 notes · View notes
fdrlibrary · 3 years
Video
youtube
United News newsreel, September 16, 1942: Presentation ceremonies for the United States’ gift of the escort ship, HNoMS King Haakon VII, to Crown Princess Martha of Norway accepting on behalf of the Norwegian Royal Navy. NAID 38922
Look to Norway
"If there is anyone who still wonders why this war is being fought, let him look to Norway. If there is anyone who has any delusions that this war could have been averted, let him look to Norway; and if there is anyone who doubts the democratic will to win, again I say, let him look to Norway." --FDR, 9/16/1942. 
In the Spring of 1940, the Norwegian Royal Family were forced to leave their homeland when Hitler brutally invaded Norway. FDR had met and befriended the Crown Prince and Princess a year earlier during their widely publicized American tour, and the President now offered the family a safe haven in Washington, DC.
After a long trek across the Atlantic and initial stays at the Roosevelt home in Hyde Park and at the White House, Crown Princess Martha and her three children, Princess Ragnihild, Princess Astrid, and Prince Harald (today His Majesty King Harald V of Norway) moved into an estate called Pook's Hill in Bethesda, MD. There they lived for the duration of the war, later triumphantly returning to Norway in June of 1945. Norwegian King Haakon VII and Crown Prince Olav moved from Norway to Great Britain where they established a government-in-exile. Crown Prince Olav visited his family in the U.S. as often as conditions allowed but remained based in London.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Above: Crown Princess Martha and Crown Prince Olav with FDR at a White House reception for their first American visit, June 29, 1939. NPx48-22 4309(5); FDR’s handwritten draft letter to Prince Olav, August 29, 1940. 
Frequent guests and close friends of FDR throughout the war, the exiled Royal Family enjoyed a welcoming and supportive relationship with the President and First Lady. Princess Martha and FDR jokingly referred to one another as Godfather and Godchild, and often shared meals, scenic drives, boating, and local entertainments together. Observers noted their common sense of humor and happy informality. Princess Martha encouraged the creation of the first Presidential Library and sat with Eleanor Roosevelt at its opening ceremonies. Later, in 1950, she and Prince Olav travelled back to Hyde Park to visit Eleanor and to view the vast archival and museum collections, where many of their own letters, gifts, and diplomatic documentation would be preserved. 
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Above: FDR and Princess Martha relax aboard the USS Potomac, NPx64-69; Prince Olav and Princess Martha tour the FDR Library, December 2,1950. NPx51-95 5(5); Page 1 of Princess Martha’s personal letter to FDR, August 6, 1941, from Roosevelt Family Papers Donated by the Children. 
The Royal Family were honored guests at the President's 4th Inaugural ceremonies as well. The Royal children, including future King Harald V, stood with the Roosevelt family on the White House steps to hear FDR’s address on that solemn January day.  
Tumblr media
Above: Children of the Roosevelt family and the Norwegian Royal Family view the 1945 Inaugural Address from the steps of the White House, January 20, 1940. NPx 72-18 391.
Princess Martha's exile began in 1940, before the United States entered World War II. By the Fall of 1942, with American forces deeply engaged in both the Pacific and European Theaters, and after a misleading TIME article suggested Norwegians were complacent under German occupation, FDR became concerned about waning international morale. As a gesture of both strength and support, on September 16th, 1942 the U.S. Navy gave a newly-built warship -- named the HNoMS King Haakon VII -- to the Norwegian Royal Navy. Ceremoniously delivered to Crown Princess Martha at the Washington Navy Yard, Roosevelt capped off the fanfare by offering a moving and historic speech. The now-famous "Look to Norway" speech asserted the strength and legitimacy of the exiled Norwegian government, the importance of a US diplomatic alliance with Norway, and the heroic spirit of the citizens of that nation. It inspired Americans, Norwegians, and Europeans alike to take heart in the fierce, stoic, and necessary resistance movement.
Read FDR’s full remarks and those of Crown Princess Martha.
Tumblr media
Above: Page 1 of FDR’s reading copy for the “Look to Norway” address delivered September 16, 1942. From President’s Master Speech File. 
Correspondence exchanged between the Roosevelts and the Norwegian Royal Family can now be found across the archives of the FDR Presidential Library. For a sample of digitized letters see the Diplomatic Correspondence Series of the President’s Secretary’s File: Box 45.
28 notes · View notes
ljones41 · 6 years
Text
"PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDES" (2011) Review
Tumblr media
"PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDES" (2011) Review When the Disney Studios and producer Jerry Bruckheimer had first released news of their intention to make sequels to their 2003 hit movie, "PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL", I reacted to the news with a great deal of wariness. In fact, I was against the idea. But after seeing 2006's "PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN’S CHEST" and 2007's "PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT WORLD’S END", my opinion had changed. I ended up enjoying the two movies just as much as I had enjoyed "CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL" . . . especially the second film. 
About two years after "AT WORLD’S END" hit the theaters, the Disney people and Bruckheimer had released news of their intention to make a fourth film. Again, I expressed wariness at the idea. I thought the three movies released between 2003 and 2007 made a neat little trilogy. There was no need for a fourth movie. But Disney and Bruckheimer went ahead with their plans and a fourth movie was recently released. But unlike "DEAD MAN’S CHEST" and "AT WORLD’S END", I found it difficult to enjoy "PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDES". I cannot say that I disliked the film. There were aspects of it that I genuinely enjoyed. Both Johnny Depp and Geoffrey Rush were in top form as Captain Jack Sparrow and Captain Hector Barbossa. But I noticed something odd about their characters in this movie. For once, Jack did not have a particular goal to attain in this film. In "CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL", he was after the Black Pearl. He was after the chest that contained Davy Jones' heart in "DEAD MAN’S CHEST" to be used to avoid a debt that he owned. And in "AT WORLD’S END", he was still after Jones' heart in order to gain the opportunity to become master of the Flying Dutchman and immortality. In this fourth movie, Jack seemed to have become swept up in Blackbeard and the British Crown's agendas. And Barbossa seemed out of place as a privateer for His Majesty King George II and the Royal Navy. There was a scene that featured him eating slices of fruit arranged on a plate. He seemed to be doing his best to project the image of an officer and a gentleman . . . only he looked rather odd. However, both actors gave top notch performances and I could find nothing to complain about. I could also say the same about the performances of Penelope Cruz, Ian McShane and Stephen Graham as Angelica, Edward "Blackbeard" Teach and a sailor named Scrum, respectively. All three were perfectly cast in their respective roles. Cruz did an excellent job in portraying the complex Angelica, who happened to be the daughter of Blackbeard. Although it is obvious that she is attracted to Jack - a former lover, she seemed to have this . . . need for her father's love that made her into some kind of twisted Daddy's girl wannabe. Unfortunately, McShane's Blackbeard seemed like poor father material. There were times when he conveyed the image of a concerned and loving father. And yet, he proved to be nothing more than an emotional vampire who would easily kill his daughter if she got in the way of his goal - the Fountain of Youth. And I must admit that not only did McShane made a witty and terrifying Blackbeard, he handled his character's twisted relationship with Angelica beautifully. Graham's Scrum almost struck me as a younger version of Jack's old friend, Joshamee Gibbs. And considering that the latter's appearance in this film seemed somewhat limited, it seemed just as well that Graham received more screen time. There were other aspects of "ON STRANGER TIDES" that I enjoyed. Or should I say, scenes? The mermaids' attacks upon Blackbeard's men and upon the H.M.S. Providence were among the most terrifying scenes I have seen in the franchise since the Kracken's attacks in "DEAD MAN’S CHEST". I also enjoyed the scene that featured Jack's mutinous meeting with members of Blackbeard's crew. Personally, I found it very funny and it brought back memories of former characters such as Pintel, Ragetti, Marty and Cotton. Jack's meeting with King George II proved to be somewhat entertaining. And it led to an equally entertaining chase sequence through the streets of mid-18th century London. But my favorite scene featured Jack marooning Angelica on a deserted island, following the death of Blackbeard. The humor not only permeated strongly in their verbal exchange, but also in director Rob Marshall's visual style. And I must admit that I also enjoyed the photography featured in the London scenes and the "island" where the Fountain of Youth was located. Cinematographer Dariusz Wolski did justice to the lush Hawaii jungle that served as one of the movie's settings. So, if I had so much to enjoy about "ON STRANGER TIDES", why did it fail to resonate within me in the end? What went wrong? At least for me? My main problem with the movie is that I felt it tried to repeat many aspects of the first film, "CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL". This is odd, considering that "ON STRANGER TIDES" was allegedly inspired by Tim Powers' 1987 novel, "On Stranger Tides". The fourth film did not come off as a remake or anything of such. But there were too many aspects of the first film that seemed to be repeated in "ON STRANGER TIDES". One, Jack's reunion with Angelica in a London tavern almost seemed like a remake of his first meeting with Will Turner in "CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL". Scrum almost seemed like a remake of Joshamee Gibbs. This is not surprising, since he had more scenes with Jack that Gibbs and the latter (along with actor Kevin McNally) seemed wasted in the movie. Two of Blackbeard's crew turned out to be zombies (if you can call them that). And they seemed like remakes (physical and otherwise) of Barbossa's first mate from the first film, Bo'sun. More importantly, the romance between missionary Philip Swift and the mermaid Syrena almost seemed like a remake of the Will Turner/Elizabeth Swann romance . . . but without the character developments. If I must be honest, Philip and Syrena's romance nearly put me to sleep on several occasions. I feel sorry for actors Sam Claflin and Àstrid Bergès-Frisbey. They seemed like two decent actors forced to work with a pair of boring and undeveloped characters. There were other problems I had with "ON STRANGER TIDES". The movie saw the return of Royal Navy officers Theodore Groves (from the first and third film) and Gillette (from the first film). What on earth did Terry Rossio and Ted Elliot did to their roles? Both characters almost seemed lobotomized. Well, Gillette did. Groves seemed to have lost his sense of humor. I recalled that he was a big fan boy of Jack in the first and third films. Yet, when he finally met Jack . . . nothing happened. He was too busy being a rather boring and stiff character. What happened to Jack and Barbossa's own quests for the Fountain of Youth, which was first introduced in "AT WORLD’S END"? After a few years of failure, the audience is led to believe that Jack simply lost interest. And Barbossa's earlier encounter with Blackbeard and the latter's ship, Queen Anne's Revenge, led to the loss of one leg and the Black Pearl. And how did Barbossa managed to survive the loss of his leg. Apparently, Barbossa had to cut off his leg to free from Blackbeard's enchanted ship lines. So, how did he manage to keep himself from bleeding to death in the ocean? How did he manage to swim to safety with one leg? And then we come to the mermaids. How did the mermaids manage to destroy Barbossa's ship, the H.M.S. Providence? It was one thing to lure men from small boats or smash said boats. It was another to do the same to a large frigate. I have never heard of such a thing in the mermaid mythology. One last major problem I had with the movie dealt with the presence of the Spanish. Like the British, they were after the Fountain of Youth. Only their leader, known as the Spaniard (portrayed by Óscar Jaenada), called himself destroying the Fountain in the name of his king and the Catholic Church, as some kind of stance against paganism. Worse, he possessed the very chalices that needed to be used to drink the Fountain's water. Yet, he did not bother to smash them, until he was at the Fountain's location. Why? And what in the hell were Elliot and Rossio thinking? Why include such a storyline that proved to be irrelevant, epsecially since Jack was able to use the Fountain's water after its so-called destruction? Following the movie’s release, I heard that Disney Studios and Bruckheimer were planning a fifth movie. I can understand this decision, considering that "ON STRANGER TIDES" raked up a great deal of profit at the box office. Frankly, I had originally wished they would change their minds. I honestly did not care how much money the movie had made. After watching it, I realized that a fourth movie should not have been made . . . at least from an artistic point of view. It featured too much sloppy writing and characterizations for me to truly enjoy.  Ironically, I ended up enjoying the franchise’s fifth entry more than I did this fourth one.  "ON STRANGER TIDES" proved to be the only PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN movie that I did not not considered as a personal favorite.
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes