#Dennis Bonnen

[sellmyhomefastfortworthtx]

Local, state leaders meet in Fort Worth to talk about legislative agenda

On Tuesday, state and local officials gathered in Fort Worth for a meeting to discuss their vision for the federal Congress and state legislature. The North Texas Commission holds an event like this every two years before the Texas legislative session begins. The event, which will take place Thursday, June 8, at the Hilton Anatole in Dallas and then move on to Plano and Frisco later that day, gives 105 communities across North Texas an opportunity to express their concerns. Sell My House Fast Fort Worth TX "It requires collaboration and innovative thought from local leaders to be able to communicate with businesses and state legislators to make sure we're getting a plan that isn't just going to benefit one city or detract from another but really lift the region as a whole," he said. Tony Bennett (President of the Texas Association of Manufacturers), Dale Craymer (President of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association), Dennis Bonnen (Former Speaker of the House in Texas)and current Senator Drew Springer (R-Weatherford) spoke about economic development. "Dr. Joe May [former Dallas College chancellor] often said, 'Autonomy is our greatest enemy,'" Brophey said. "That is a lesson we like to preach at the commission. You can see that exemplified in the plan that put DFW Airport into action. Two major cities that certainly had the resources to go it alone decided to combine those efforts. The impact from that is far greater than either one of those airports would have been on their own." The speaker adds that events like Tuesday's may assist North Texas cities in assessing future regional initiatives. "When we look 50 years in the future, when we think, 'What's our next DFW Airport?' For a project of that scale and magnitude, I think we'll take the same approach to it," he said. The panel included superintendents of Aledo and Denton ISDs, as well as Representatives Terry Meza and Glenn Rogers. Eric Reeves served as the moderator. High STEPS is a consulting firm that worked with Dallas ISD to create its P-TECH and early college programs. "I'd love the legislature to really steady the challenges they put in place," Reeves said. "There are challenges through bureaucracy, through differing programs from the Workforce Commission, Higher Education Coordinating Board and [Texas Education Agency] that really stand in the way of progress." This year, The Texas Education Agency began allowing school districts to develop their own academic standards. According with Reeves, districts might profit from more flexibility in testing. Instead of every student being required to take the STAAR test, he thinks that kids who show an interest in a trade and kids who express an interest in college should not be forced to undertake the same classes. "Differing skills really need different types of assessments. Holding every student to the same assessment doesn't match up with what the economy's doing," he said. "The economy's dynamic. Assessments should be dynamic in such a way that it shows what a student is learning so we're creating a pathway." Reeves states that present testing may not disclose if a student is set to enter the workforce. "I think what we have is a one-size-fits-all solution at a time when technology is so vibrant, education is so vibrant, the economy is so vibrant, a one size solution really seems like it's short-changing our citizens," he said. Reeve's comments suggest that schools are starting to change in response to these trends. Early college and P-Tech programs for youngsters who show an interest in college or a trade, he says, are examples of this trend. Schools are also collaborating more closely with the business sector to assist students finish school with a skill they may utilize to obtain a living wage. "We have great leaders in education," he said. "We need to give them flexibility. We need to give students more opportunities to access their career paths and go into these different arenas."

#sell my home fast fort worth tx #sell my house fast fort worth tx #sell house fast fort worth tx

[nhacly]

What Does MAGA Look Like After Trump? This Weekend’s Protests Offer Clues.

What Does MAGA Look Like After Trump? This Weekend’s Protests Offer Clues.

This weekend, a few hundred Texans gathered at Dallas City Hall to protest a stolen presidential election and, with it, the triumph of a global cabal of pedophiles, the introduction of Caracas-style economics, and the imminent end of the Republic. Allen West, the camera-loving chair of the Republican party of Texas who Texas Speaker of the House Dennis Bonnen has suggested needs a “one-way ticket…

View On WordPress

[education30and40blog]

Dennis Bonnen Discusses The Importance Of Education –

See on Scoop.it - Education 2.0 & 3.0

Education is one of the essential things in life. It opens up doors to opportunities that would otherwise be unavailable. It allows people to achieve their dreams and aspirations. That is why everyone needs access to education, regardless of their socioeconomic status or location. In this article, expert Dennis Bonnen will discuss the importance of…

[tomorrowusa]

Remember when idiotic Republicans like Sarah Palin were complaining that Obamacare meant that there would be “death panels” in the US?

Years into Obamacare, Palin and her crew must feel disappointed. But the right-wing resistance to mask mandates and vaccination mandates have led to a type of death lottery in parts of the country resistant to common sense pandemic precautions.

The states with the worst outbreaks in confirmed cases per capita right now — Tennessee, Kentucky, Alaska, Wyoming, and West Virginia, according to the New York Times’s tracker — have either set new hospitalization records in the last several weeks or are near their previous highs from the winter wave. All of them have vaccination rates below the national average. Throughout the South, hospitals are reporting they have more patients in need of ICU care than ICU beds available, as the Times reported on Tuesday.

America, the richest country in the world, is not supposed to be a place where patients are left at the door to die. Yet that is exactly what’s happening now — 18 months into the pandemic.

It’s not just COVID patients who are suffering from the overcrowding of hospitals. Maybe you remember the case of Daniel Wilkinson.

In Bellville, Texas, 46-year-old military veteran Daniel Wilkinson was rushed to the emergency room. He was diagnosed with gallstone pancreatitis, which is treatable but which his local hospital was not equipped to treat, according to KPRC. The doctor called all over the region — to hospitals in Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, among others — but could not find a hospital that would take him.

Mr. Wilkinson finally found a hospital that would take him – but it was too late. He died of pancreatitis which could have been successfully treated on time if hospitals in Texas were not overflowing with anti-vaxxing COVID patients

Daniel Wilkinson is certainly not alone in being unable to to obtain prompt medical care.

On Monday, the Washington Post reported that a 73-year-old Alabama man died of a cardiac emergency after being turned away from more than 40 hospitals. The closest hospital that would take him was 200 miles away in Mississippi. 

In addition to the overcrowding problems caused by anti-vaxxing morons, the US has no system to serve as a clearinghouse for available hospital space.

Other countries appear to have avoided unnecessary deaths because they have a real system to coordinate care. In Britain, hospitals are currently able to handle more emergency care than the average volume prior to the pandemic, according to recent research by the Nuffield Trust, though elective surgeries are still sometimes being canceled.

“Hospitals have been incredibly stretched but have always been able to offer urgent and emergency care,” Nick Scriven, a UK doctor and past president of the Society of Acute Medicine, told me. “People were not turned away if they needed a hospital bed.”

The pandemic laid bare how disastrously disorganized the US health system is. But that’s always been true. It just usually reveals itself in more subtle ways.

We have no such system in the US because the loony right would start braying about socialism or something like that.

Too much medical and pharmaceutical care in the US is still in the hands of entities whose primary goal is to make big profits – not to cure people. We’ve seen graphically how the plague of opioid deaths in the US has been caused by greedy drug companies acting as pushers.

The people who claim that the US has the best healthcare system in the world try to get you to ignore the fact that the US still has the highest number of deaths from COVID-19. As of Thursday morning the US had 666,618 COVID deaths. We’re still ahead of Bolsonaro’s Brazil with its 588,597 pandemic fatalities.      

For now, all we can do is encourage vaccination mandates. But next year there will be an opportunity to vote Republican COVID-19 Death Panels out of office.

#death panels #covid-19 #coronavirus #pandemic #vaccination mandates #anti-vaxxers #republicans #hospital overcrowding #for-profit healthcare #healthcare rationing #texas #greg abbott #dan patrick #dennis bonnen #election 2022

[nickelaries81]

Differences in between Democratic and Republican platforms

All of us understand that the Democrats and Republicans differ on some quite key points, right? However, have you ever before actually aimed to see what those differences are? Well, that is what we are mosting likely to do right here. We are mosting likely to undergo the significant distinctions in between Autonomous and also Republican systems. Do bear in mind that both parties might change their sights, often based upon what they believe will certainly obtain them the most ballots from their base. However, we have attempted to stay with talking about their existing perspective, or at least the ones that the celebrations appear to have held for a very long time currently. Abortion The distinction between the two celebrations is quite reduced as well as dry below. Democrats want to ensure that ladies have complete control of their very own bodies as well as ought to be enabled an abortion if they wish to have one performed. The Republicans intend to make abortions unlawful under all conditions. Actually, they wish to go to the sizes to change the constitution to prevent any person from ruling that abortion is legal once more. Apparently this will certainly be via having coming fetuses stated as legal humans, which they currently are not in a lot of scenarios. Migration The Republicans wish to have exceptionally rigorous migration treatments. In fact, stringent to the point where it would be tremendously challenging to move to the United States. This was a ' tough system' for the Republicans throughout the 2016 election as well as throughout the Presidency of Donald Trump. Although, there is really little info on exactly how this migration plan would occur. They have actually taken strides to ban migration from particular countries, plus the partial building of a wall on the Mexican border to assist cut down on illegal immigration because area. The Democrats are somewhat various. They do not wish to have uncontrolled migration, that is for certain. Nevertheless, they intend to make immigration a little bit easier, specifically for those that can deliver value to the USA. The Democrats believe that any kind of illegal immigrant presently in the United States should be supplied with legal citizenship ought to they fulfill particular standards. Environment Change Climate Adjustment uses a quite specific distinction between both parties. The Democrats count on Environment Adjustment. They desire the world ( as well as the United States) to put a company focus on taking care of climate change. This includes carrying out numerous plans, including the rejoining of the Paris Climate Accord. They believe that a firm effort requires to be taken to take care of the setting. The majority of Republicans speaker like Dennis Bonnen, R-Lake Jackson seem to think that Environment Change isn't actually a science-based fact, however something that is extra political. They believe that data from researchers is incorrect and requires to come under more examination. Over the last few years, the Republicans have taken actions to prop up some of the largest industries that influence the climate e.g. the gas and oil industry. That being claimed, when each event was in power, we did see a decrease in air pollution in the United States. Although, how much of this was down the plan of either event is anyone's assumption. Medicare There is a fair bit of complication on the Medicare front. A minimum of when it concerns the Democrats. One half of the event seems to think that Medicare ought to cover everybody in the country. This means something comparable to Universal Medical care. The louder part of the party simply wants to prolong Medicare protection to those over 55. However, it appears many would certainly be fine maintaining the system as it is. The Republicans want to remove Medicare completely. They believe that everybody needs to be on an insurance plan. It appears that they do not have a plan for those that might not have insurance coverage, although apparently they would certainly pay for therapy approximately a specific quantity for the without insurance. The system isn't clear sufficient to understand for sure. Ballot Legal rights There appears to be only one significant distinction in between both parties when it comes to voting civil liberties. Obviously, both celebrations just wish to permit legal votes to occur. The Democrats believe that everybody entitled to a ballot ought to be enabled to elect with the minimal number of difficulties. The Republicans intend to carry out some type of voter ID. The Democrats say that something like this can potentially disenfranchise voters. Nevertheless, if it was made also tough to obtain an ID, then particular individuals would not be able to elect, also when legally qualified to do so. The Republicans are trying to find a major overhaul of the ballot system, whereas Democrats intend to maintain ballot civil liberties extensively the same. Same-Sex Marriage In the case of Same-Sex marital relationship, the Democrats take the view that individuals must be allowed to wed whoever they such as. Well, at least on the same-sex front. They aren't exactly opening the doors to cousins or siblings marrying. The Republicans think that marital relationship needs to only be between a man and also a lady. As a matter of fact, they have gone as far as to state that constitutionally a marital relationship can just be in between a guy and also a woman. Although, the High court did rule in a different way on that front.

#Dennis Bonnen #R-Lake Jackson

[rainstraw14]

Distinctions between Democratic and Republican platforms

All of us understand that the Democrats and also Republicans differ on some rather bottom lines, right? However, have you ever before actually sought to see what those differences are? Well, that is what we are mosting likely to do below. We are mosting likely to go through the significant differences between Democratic as well as Republican platforms. Do keep in mind that both events may alter their sights, usually based upon what they think will obtain them one of the most ballots from their base. However, we have tried to adhere to talking about their current point of view, or at least the ones that the parties appear to have held for a long time now.

Abortion

The difference in between the two events is quite cut and completely dry below. Democrats wish to make sure that women have complete control of their own bodies and need to be allowed an abortion if they want to have one carried out. The Republicans wish to make abortions prohibited under all conditions. In fact, they wish to go to the sizes to modify the constitution to avoid any person from ruling that abortion is legal once again. Allegedly this will certainly be with having coming fetuses declared as legal humans, which they currently are not in a lot of scenarios.

Migration

The Republicans want to have extremely rigorous immigration procedures. As a matter of fact, rigorous to the point where it would be exceptionally challenging to move to the United States. This was a 'hard system' for the Republicans throughout the 2016 political election as well as throughout the Presidency of Donald Trump. Although, there is very little info on exactly how this immigration strategy would occur. They have actually taken strides to outlaw immigration from particular countries, plus the partial structure of a wall surface on the Mexican border to help minimize unlawful migration in that location. The Democrats are slightly various. They do not intend to have uncontrolled immigration, that is for sure. Nevertheless, they wish to make immigration a bit easier, especially for those that can deliver worth to the United States. The Democrats think that any illegal immigrant presently in the USA ought to be offered with lawful citizenship ought to they satisfy certain standards.

Climate Modification

Environment Change uses a pretty precise distinction between the two parties. The Democrats rely on Climate Change. They desire the globe ( and also the USA) to position a company concentrate on handling climate modification. This consists of implementing several policies, consisting of the rejoining of the Paris Environment Accord. They believe that a company effort needs to be taken to deal with the environment. Many Republicans speaker like Dennis Bonnen, R-Lake Jackson appear to think that Climate Modification isn't truly a science-based reality, yet something that is a lot more political. They believe that data from scientists is incorrect and requires ahead under more scrutiny. In recent times, the Republicans have taken steps to prop up a few of the biggest sectors that impact the environment e.g. the gas and oil market. That being said, when each event was in power, we did see a decrease in pollution in the United States. Although, how much of this was down the policy of either celebration is anybody's hunch.

Medicare

There is a fair bit of confusion on the Medicare front. A minimum of when it concerns the Democrats. One half of the party seems to believe that Medicare ought to cover everybody in the country. This means something similar to Universal Medical care. The louder part of the celebration simply intends to prolong Medicare coverage to those over 55. However, it appears many would certainly be fine maintaining the system as it is. The Republicans wish to remove Medicare completely. They think that everyone must get on an insurance strategy. It appears that they do not have a prepare for those that might not have insurance coverage, although allegedly they would certainly pay for therapy up to a specific quantity for the uninsured. The platform isn't clear sufficient to understand for sure.

Voting Rights

There seems to be just one major distinction in between the two events when it comes to voting legal rights. Of course, both celebrations just wish to enable legal votes to happen. The GOVERNMENTbelieve that everybody qualified to a ballot should be enabled to elect with the minimum number of hurdles. The Republicans wish to implement some type of citizen ID. The Democrats say that something such as this could potentially disenfranchise voters. Besides, if it was made too hard to get an ID, then certain people wouldn't be able to elect, even when lawfully entitled to do so. The Republicans are looking for a major overhaul of the voting system, whereas Democrats wish to keep voting rights broadly the same.

Same-Sex Marriage

In the case of Same-Sex marital relationship, the Democrats take the sight that people should be permitted to wed whoever they like. Well, a minimum of on the same-sex front. They aren't specifically unlocking to cousins or siblings marrying. The Republicans believe that marital relationship must just be between a man and also a lady. In fact, they have actually reached to state that constitutionally a marital relationship can only be in between a man as well as a woman. Although, the High court did rule in a different way on that front.

#Dennis Bonnen #R-Lake Jackson

[rockshirt8]

Distinctions in between Democratic as well as Republican platforms

All of us recognize that the Democrats and Republicans differ on some rather key points, right? However, have you ever really wanted to see what those distinctions are? Well, that is what we are mosting likely to do below. We are mosting likely to go through the significant distinctions in between Democratic and Republican systems. Do bear in mind that both parties might transform their views, usually based upon what they believe will acquire them one of the most ballots from their base. Nevertheless, we have attempted to adhere to talking about their existing point of view, or at the very least the ones that the events appear to have held for a long period of time now. Abortion The difference in between the two events is quite cut as well as dry right here. Democrats intend to make sure that females have complete control of their own bodies and also should be allowed an abortion if they desire to have one accomplished. The Republicans wish to make abortions prohibited under all situations. In fact, they want to go to the sizes to modify the constitution to avoid anyone from ruling that abortion is legal again. Allegedly this will be via having unborn fetuses stated as legal humans, which they currently are not in a lot of scenarios. Immigration The Republicans intend to have incredibly strict migration procedures. As a matter of fact, rigorous to the point where it would certainly be greatly difficult to move to the United States. This was a ' tough platform' for the Republicans during the 2016 political election and throughout the Presidency of Donald Trump. Although, there is extremely little info on how this immigration strategy would take place. They have actually taken strides to prohibit migration from particular countries, plus the partial building of a wall on the Mexican border to help lower unlawful migration because location. The GOVERNMENT are somewhat different. They do not want to have unattended immigration, that is without a doubt. However, they want to make immigration a little bit much easier, especially for those that can supply value to the United States. The Democrats believe that any illegal immigrant presently in the United States need to be offered with lawful citizenship ought to they fulfill specific criteria. Climate Modification Climate Adjustment supplies a pretty clear-cut distinction between both events. The Democrats count on Climate Change. They desire the globe ( and also the USA) to place a company focus on taking care of environment modification. This consists of executing a number of plans, consisting of the rejoining of the Paris Environment Accord. They think that a firm initiative requires to be taken to deal with the setting. A lot of Republicans audio speaker like Dennis Bonnen, R-Lake Jackson appear to think that Climate Adjustment isn't really a science-based truth, but something that is extra political. They believe that data from scientists is incorrect and requires to come under more scrutiny. Over the last few years, the Republicans have actually taken steps to prop up some of the biggest industries that influence the environment e.g. the gas as well as oil market. That being stated, when each celebration was in power, we did see a decrease in air pollution in the USA. Although, how much of this was down the policy of either party is anybody's hunch. Medicare There is a fair bit of confusion on the Medicare front. At least when it comes to the Democrats. One fifty percent of the event appears to believe that Medicare must cover everyone in the country. This indicates something akin to Universal Health care. The louder part of the celebration simply wishes to extend Medicare insurance coverage to those over 55. However, it seems lots of would certainly be great keeping the system as it is. The Republicans intend to eliminate Medicare completely. They think that everybody should get on an insurance plan. It appears that they do not have a plan for those that may not have insurance, although apparently they would pay for therapy approximately a specific amount for the uninsured. The system isn't clear adequate to understand without a doubt. Ballot Civil liberties There seems to be only one significant distinction in between both celebrations when it involves electing rights. Obviously, both events just intend to allow lawful ballots to occur. The Democrats believe that everyone qualified to a vote must be permitted to elect with the minimal number of hurdles. The Republicans wish to implement some type of voter ID. The Democrats argue that something such as this can possibly disenfranchise voters. Nevertheless, if it was made too hard to get an ID, then particular people would not have the ability to vote, even when lawfully entitled to do so. The Republicans are seeking a significant overhaul of the ballot system, whereas Democrats want to keep ballot civil liberties broadly the exact same. Same-Sex Marital relationship In the case of Same-Sex marital relationship, the Democrats take the view that people need to be enabled to marry whoever they such as. Well, at least on the same-sex front. They aren't exactly opening the doors to relatives or brother or sisters marrying. The Republicans believe that marriage must just be between a guy and a female. As a matter of fact, they have actually reached to claim that constitutionally a marriage can only be in between a man and also a lady. Although, the Supreme Court did rule differently on that front.

#Dennis Bonnen #R-Lake Jackson

[virgobreath9]

What Are The Levels of American Government?

The American federal government is separated right into three degrees- the city government, the state government, as well as the federal government. We breakdown these different degrees for far better understanding. LOCAL GOVERNMENT In the UNITED STATES, the city government is the lowest degree of government. Most Americans have extra contact with the local government than their state or federal government. The state federal government gives the city government territory to take care of smaller sized, regional problems. The local government is split up into 4 different degrees. One of these levels is the county level. Every state is separated right into subdivisions called regions and the regions functions to administer state legislations in that particular geographical region. There are well over 3,000 different counties in the United States. The responsibilities of the counties include taking care of areas such as colleges, libraries, hospitals, and also parks, as well as the area courts, the area emergency situation systems (such as the police as well as fire response systems), and also the road systems. The county is also documents births, fatalities, and also marital relationships. The next degree of the city government is the township degree. In some states, a township is a smaller geographic area in a region. These municipalities are generally a subdivision of the area but they can also act as another name for a community or a city. Several areas have actually an elected board of authorities that run certain services like trash collection and also maintaining of the roadways. In some regions, the fire and also authorities systems are covered in the town degree as opposed to the area level. The following degree of the city government is towns. Municipalities are frequently simply one more name for a community or city's administrative area. People who live in a district will certainly usually choose an elected mayor. These mayors will certainly perform the tasks as the exec councilors and also will certainly function as lawmakers in their location. A mayor of a town will supervise of running numerous public services. They likewise function as the public face for official occasions (such as events) as well as they additionally elect as a council member in municipality votes. The last level of the local Government are unique districts. Special areas offer a special feature to a certain entity. An instance of a unique district could include the education and learning system, the waste monitoring system, or the department of transport. As an example, within the education system, schools will certainly create school districts. These school districts are run by elected school board participants that supervise of establishing problems for the regional schools like improving the general public school system, as well as voting on plans such as college attires, after-school activities, as well as the hiring of new educators. MENTION GOVERNMENT Over the local government, relaxes the state government. All fifty states have state federal governments, as well as Puerto Rico as well as Washington D.C. The states all have a state constitution that is made use of as the basis for their regulations, yet modifications are also enabled to be contributed to the constitution to include brand-new legislations. The state federal government is split right into 3 branches- the executive branch, the legal branch, and also the judiciary branch. The executive branch is comprised off the governor ( that is the top executive authorities in the state), the lieutenant governor (the 2nd highest authorities), the secretary of state (who is the authorities of business and elections), the chief law officer (the state's primary lawful officer that supervises of prosecuting individuals who have broken the regulation), the treasurer (the person that is in charge of the state's financial resources), and also the commissioner of agriculture (who manages fruit and vegetables manufacturing and guarantees sector security). The state guvs are elected every 4 years by an political election. The legislative branch is also composed of chosen members. These members can recommend expenses, rise taxes, and suggest regulations for their governor. The state regulation branch is very comparable to the government regulation branch. The last branch of the state federal government is the judiciary branch. This branch deals with the state's constitution, as well as problems with the USA constitution. Crook cases will certainly most likely to the judiciary court, as well as handling household legislation, accidents, as well as contracts. Read More: Republican Politician Speaker- Dennis Bonnen, R-Lake Jackson FEDERAL GOVERNMENT The federal government supervises the whole country, rather than the other parts of the government which just manages specific areas. The federal government is broken up right into 5 different departments. The executive office of the president is forgotten by the president's Chief of Team. This workplace gives the President of the United States with the support they require to make executive decisions. This workplace will certainly give the president with info on national security, trade concerns, and more. The executive divisions are closet degree offices which are overseen by an appointed assistant. These departments all concentrate on a details location, such as the Division of Education and learning and also the Division of Wellness and also Human Being Services. Independent executive companies are firms with specialized functions and also they do not require executive control. An example of one of these firms is the Central Intelligence Company (CIA). There are additionally independent regulatory agencies which perform details responsibilities that carry out legislations that directly influence the public. These firms are run by a board or payment as well as are likewise without executive control. Examples of these firms consist of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also the Federal Reserve System (the Fed). Finally, there are government corporations. These firms are created by the federal government to give civil services. They frequently obtain federal government funding, as well as some may additionally charge customers for their services. Amtrak (the nation's railway service) and the US Postal Service are both government corporations.

#Dennis Bonnen #R-Lake Jackson

[roadvoyage8]

Distinctions in between Democratic and also Republican platforms

We all understand that the Democrats and also Republicans differ on some quite bottom lines, right? Nevertheless, have you ever before actually wanted to see what those distinctions are? Well, that is what we are mosting likely to do right here. We are going to go through the significant differences between Autonomous as well as Republican systems. Do bear in mind that both celebrations might transform their views, often based upon what they believe will certainly obtain them one of the most votes from their base. However, we have actually tried to stay with discussing their existing point of view, or at least the ones that the celebrations appear to have held for a long time now. Abortion The difference between the two celebrations is pretty cut as well as completely dry right here. Democrats wish to ensure that ladies have complete control of their own bodies and must be permitted an abortion if they wish to have one performed. The Republicans wish to make abortions prohibited under all situations. In fact, they wish to go to the lengths to amend the constitution to prevent any person from ruling that abortion is lawful once more. Supposedly this will certainly be through having coming fetuses stated as legal human beings, which they currently are not in a lot of conditions. Immigration The Republicans intend to have unbelievably stringent migration treatments. As a matter of fact, rigorous to the point where it would certainly be tremendously challenging to relocate to the United States. This was a ' difficult platform' for the Republicans during the 2016 election and throughout the Presidency of Donald Trump. Although, there is really little information on exactly how this immigration strategy would certainly occur. They have actually taken strides to ban immigration from certain nations, plus the partial structure of a wall surface on the Mexican boundary to assist reduce unlawful immigration in that location. The GOVERNMENT are a little different. They do not want to have unchecked immigration, that is for certain. Nonetheless, they wish to make migration a little easier, especially for those that can supply worth to the United States. The Democrats think that any kind of illegal alien currently in the United States ought to be supplied with legal citizenship ought to they meet certain standards. Climate Adjustment Environment Adjustment uses a rather clear-cut distinction in between both celebrations. The Democrats count on Environment Modification. They want the world ( and also the United States) to position a company focus on dealing with environment adjustment. This consists of executing several plans, including the rejoining of the Paris Environment Accord. They believe that a firm initiative requires to be taken to deal with the environment. Many Republicans speaker like Dennis Bonnen, R-Lake Jackson seem to think that Environment Change isn't really a science-based truth, yet something that is much more political. They believe that data from researchers is incorrect as well as needs to find under even more analysis. In the last few years, the Republicans have taken actions to prop up a few of the largest industries that influence the environment e.g. the gas and oil market. That being claimed, when each celebration was in power, we did see a reduction in air pollution in the USA. Although, how much of this was down the policy of either celebration is anybody's guess. Medicare There is quite a bit of complication on the Medicare front. A minimum of when it pertains to the Democrats. One fifty percent of the event seems to think that Medicare needs to cover everyone in the nation. This means something akin to Universal Healthcare. The louder part of the celebration just wants to prolong Medicare coverage to those over 55. Nevertheless, it appears many would be fine maintaining the system as it is. The Republicans intend to eliminate Medicare entirely. They believe that everybody should get on an insurance plan. It seems that they do not have a prepare for those that may not have insurance coverage, although allegedly they would pay for treatment up to a certain amount for the uninsured. The platform isn't clear enough to know for sure. Ballot Rights There appears to be only one significant distinction in between both parties when it pertains to electing rights. Obviously, both events only intend to allow lawful ballots to happen. The Democrats think that everyone entitled to a vote must be allowed to elect with the minimum number of difficulties. The Republicans want to execute some type of voter ID. The Democrats say that something such as this might possibly disenfranchise citizens. Nevertheless, if it was made also hard to obtain an ID, then certain people wouldn't be able to vote, even when legitimately qualified to do so. The Republicans are seeking a major overhaul of the ballot system, whereas Democrats want to keep ballot civil liberties broadly the same. Same-Sex Marriage In the case of Same-Sex marriage, the Democrats take the view that people should be enabled to wed whoever they such as. Well, at the very least on the same-sex front. They aren't exactly opening the doors to cousins or siblings weding. The Republicans believe that marriage should only be in between a guy and a female. In fact, they have actually reached to say that constitutionally a marital relationship can just be between a guy and also a lady. Although, the High court did rule differently on that particular front.

#Dennis Bonnen #R-Lake Jackson

[unclesamsmisguidedclub]

Texas Republican May Be Standing Against Permitless Carry Bill- HB 357

Texas Republican May Be Standing Against Permitless Carry Bill- HB 357

Twelve Texas Republicans introduced HB 357, permitless carry, last year. In this new legislative session, it is reportedly being held up by the Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Bonnen with the help of an anti-gun Democrat. The anti-gun Democrat, Alfonso “Poncho” Nevarez, also happens to be in charge of the Homeland Security and Public Safety committee, where the bill is currently sitting.…

View On WordPress

#Alfonso Nevarez #Austin #Constitutional Carry #Dennis Bonnen #gun laws #HB 357 #Homeland Security and Public Safety #Permitless carry #Texas #Texas Speaker of the House

[silmafase]

Sueños de Oro

#entrelazosdeamorypensamientos #gifs anime #cute gifs #my gifs #gifs magicos #gifs #buenasnoches #bonnenuit #dennis bonnen #notte #buonanotte

[dennisbonnen]

Texas Speaker of the House Dennis Bonnen, R-Angleton, praised Trump’s decision, but lambasted federal lawmakers for “hypocrisy” and “complacency,” saying in part:

“In what is becoming all too common for Congress, the COVID-19 relief bill was dumped on the President’s desk filled with pork spending and pet projects, which significantly reduced the meaningful support that struggling Americans deserve,” said Bonnen. “It is clear President Trump recognized the immense flaws of the bill but was backed into a corner due to Congress running out the clock and sending him an all-or-nothing proposal.”

Bonnen’s comments come just one day after he announced he, his wife and his son had all tested positive for coronavirus.

#dennis bonnen

[lukemeintheeye]

Today, Michael Quinn Sullivan of Empower Texans released the long-awaited recording of his once-secret June meeting with Speaker Dennis Bonnen (R-Angleton) and Rep. Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock).

The three begin with about ten minutes of small talk about Sullivan’s summer travels — before Bonnen breaks the ice.“I’m trying to win in 2020,” he says.Bonnen acknowledges the “millions of dollars [spent] in primaries” before telling Sullivan if he “need[s] some primaries” to get involved in, he’ll leave and let Burrows divulge the names of “ten moderate Republicans.”

In return for Sullivan’s compliance to target only these agreed-upon members, Bonnen will extend an offer. “You need to hear what I want to do for you,” he says.

Sullivan rejects the premise that he needs anything from the speaker, but is interrupted by an insistent Bonnen who offers his group coveted House media credentials — the quid pro quo.

#Michael Quinn Sullivan #Dennis Bonnen #Dustin Burrows #quid pro quo #GOP

[politiciandirect]

Possible Felony-Level Bribery Scandal in Texas Deepens as Reported Audio is Shared Among Republican Officials

Possible Felony-Level Bribery Scandal in Texas Deepens as Reported Audio is Shared Among Republican Officials

At least three Texas state representatives said they believe the House Speaker has not been truthful about a meeting with a political activist where an alleged bribery attempt took place. The comments come after the legislators listened to a purported recording of the meeting captured by the activist.

“What I derived from the audio tape — it’s very clear — is that Speaker Bonnen was not truthful…

View On WordPress

#Border / Cartel Chronicles #breitbart #Bribery #Dennis Bonnen #Dustin Burrows #Michael Quinn Sullivan #Political corruption #Politics #Texas Speaker of the House

[sagarkumarworld-blog]

NEW ANNOUNCEMENT TO CHANGE THE TEXAS POLITICS

As we near the 2020 elections, significant changes are being made in the United States’ political scene from notifications of retirement to publications of entering the political scene, there is news in every aspect that you wish to see or read this political season.

A republican speaker at the texas house of representatives has recently announced that we won’t be contesting the re-elections of 2020. Dennis Bonnen announced this among the outrage that he has been facing over a secretly recorded meeting with an activist that has plunged him deeper into the ongoing scandal and allegations that are being thrown at him. He was also being pressurized by his party people to leave the political game as he was doing more harm to the party than he was doing benefit to the scene. His announcement came just over a week after the recording of the meeting was released that he had on the 12th of June with the conservative activists who have caused a lot of harm to his image in the political scene. Mr. Bonnen was an amazing skilled legislative tactician known for a confrontational side, and he will be missed by the republicans in the political scene as he had a massive impact on the politics of the United States.

It will be interesting to see who announces to contest elections in place of Mr. Bidden and what they have to offer for the political scene of the Texas state, which is also a crucial step to the presidential win ladder for the 2020 elections as per the republicans view.

#texas politics Dennis Bonnen Bidden elections

[fuckyeahtx]

Letters From An American

Today in Fuck Abbott and the GQP Harder Than Ever Before Welcome to Fucking Gilead Edition

September 1, 2021

Heather Cox Richardson

Last night at midnight, a new law went into effect in Texas. House Bill 1927 permits people to carry handguns without a permit, unless they have been convicted of a felony or domestic violence. This measure was not popular in the state. Fifty-nine percent of Texans—including law enforcement officers—opposed it. But 56% of Republicans supported it. “I don’t know what it’s a solution to,” James McLaughlin, executive director of the Texas Police Chiefs Association, said to Heidi Pérez-Moreno of the Texas Tribune when Republican governor Greg Abbott signed the bill in mid-August. “I don’t know what the problem was to start with.”

Texas Gun Rights executive director Chris McNutt had a different view. He said in a statement: “Texas is finally a pro-gun state despite years of foot-dragging, roadblocks, and excuses from the spineless political class.”

The bill had failed in 2019 after McNutt showed up at the home of the Texas House Speaker, Republican Dennis Bonnen, to demand its passage. Bonnen said McNutt’s “overzealous” visit exhibited “insanity.” "Threats and intimidation will never advance your issue. Their issue is dead," he told McNutt. McNutt told the Dallas Morning News: "If politicians like Speaker Dennis Bonnen think they can show up at the doorsteps of Second Amendment supporters and make promises to earn votes in the election season, they shouldn't be surprised when we show up in their neighborhoods to insist they simply keep their promises in the legislative session.”

That was not the only bill that went into effect at midnight last night in Texas. In May, Governor Abbott signed the strongest anti-abortion law in the country, Senate Bill 8, which went into effect on September 1. It bans abortion after 6 weeks—when many women don’t even know they’re pregnant—thus automatically stopping about 85% of abortions in Texas. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. Opponents of the bill had asked the Supreme Court to stop the law from taking effect. It declined to do so.

The law avoided the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision protecting the right to abortion before fetal viability at about 22 to 24 weeks by leaving the enforcement of the law not up to the state, but rather up to private citizens. This was deliberate. As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern explained in an article in Slate: “Typically, when a state restricts abortion, providers file a lawsuit in federal court against the state officials responsible for enforcing the new law. Here, however, there are no such officials: The law is enforced by individual anti-abortion activists.” With this law, there’s no one to stop from enforcing it.

S.B. 8 puts ordinary people in charge of law enforcement. Anyone—at all—can sue any individual who “aids or abets,” or even intends to abet, an abortion in Texas after six weeks. Women seeking abortion themselves are exempt, but anyone who advises them (including a spouse), gives them a ride, provides counseling, staffs a clinic, and so on, can be sued by any random stranger. If the plaintiff wins, they pocket $10,000 plus court costs, and the clinic that provided the procedure is closed down. If the defendant doesn’t defend themselves, the court must find them guilty. And if the defendant wins, they get…nothing. Not even attorney’s fees.

So, nuisance lawsuits will ruin abortion providers, along with anyone accused of aiding and abetting—or intending to abet—an abortion. And the enforcers will be ordinary citizens.

Texas has also just passed new voting restrictions that allow partisan poll watchers to have “free movement” in polling places, enabling them to intimidate voters. Texas governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign that bill in the next few days.

Taken together with the vigilantism running wild in school board meetings and attacks on election officials, the Texas legislation is a top red flag in the red flag factory. The Republican Party is empowering vigilantes to enforce their beliefs against their neighbors.

The law, which should keep us all on a level playing field, has been abandoned by our Supreme Court. Last night, it refused to stop the new Texas abortion law from going into effect, and tonight, just before midnight, by a 5–4 vote, it issued an opinion refusing to block the law. Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent read: “The court’s order is stunning. Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand.”

Texas’s law flouts nearly 50 years of federal precedents, she points out, but the Supreme Court has looked the other way. ”The State’s gambit worked,” Sotomayor wrote. She continued: “This is untenable. It cannot be the case that a state can evade federal judicial scrutiny by outsourcing the enforcement of unconstitutional laws to its citizenry."

The Supreme Court has essentially blessed the efforts of Texas legislators to prevent the enforcement of federal law by using citizen vigilantes to get their way. The court decided the case on its increasingly active “shadow docket,” a series of cases decided without full briefings or oral argument, often in the dead of night, without signed opinions. In the past, such emergency decisions were rare and used to issue uncontroversial decisions or address irreparable immediate harm (like the death penalty). Since the beginning of the Trump administration, they have come to make up the majority of the court’s business.

Since 2017, the court has used the shadow docket to advance right-wing goals. It has handed down brief, unsigned decisions after a party asks for emergency relief from a lower court order, siding first with Trump, and now with state Republicans, at a high rate. As University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck noted: “In less than three years, [Trump’s] Solicitor General has filed at least twenty-one applications for stays in the Supreme Court (including ten during the October 2018 Term alone).” In comparison, “during the sixteen years of the George W. Bush and Obama Administrations, the Solicitor General filed a total of eight such applications—averaging one every other Term.”

So, operating without open arguments or opinions, the Supreme Court has shown that it will not enforce federal law, leaving state legislatures to do as they will. This, after all, was the whole point of the “originalism” that Republicans embraced under President Ronald Reagan. Originalists wanted to erase the legal justification of the post–World War II years that used the “due process” and “equal protection” clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to apply the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states. It was that concept that protected civil rights for people of color and for women, by using the federal government to prohibit states from enforcing discriminatory laws.

Since the 1980s, Republicans have sought to hamstring federal power and return power to the states, which have neither the power nor the inclination to regulate businesses effectively, and which can discriminate against minorities and get away with it, so long as the federal government doesn’t enforce equal protection.

Today’s events make that a reality.

Worse, though, the mechanisms of the Texas law officially turn a discriminatory law over to state-level vigilantes to enforce. The wedge to establish this mechanism is abortion, but the door is now open for extremist state legislatures to turn to private citizens to enforce any law that takes away an individual’s legal right…like, say, the right to vote. And in Texas, now, a vigilante doesn't even have to have a permit to carry the gun that will back up his threats.

During Reconstruction, vigilantes also carried guns. They enforced state customs that reestablished white supremacy after the federal government had tried to defend equality before the law. It took only a decade for former Confederates who had tried to destroy the government to strip voting rights, and civil rights, from the southern Black men who had defended the United States government during the Civil War. For the next eighty years, the South was a one-party state where enforcement of the laws depended on your skin color, your gender, and whom you knew.

Opponents have compared those who backed the Texas anti-abortion law to the Taliban, the Islamic extremists in Afghanistan whose harsh interpretation of Islamic Sharia law strips women of virtually all rights. But the impulse behind the Texas law, the drive to replace the federal protection of civil rights with state vigilantes enforcing their will, is homegrown. It is a reflection of the position that Republicans would like women to have in our society, for sure, but it is also written in the laughing faces of Mississippi law enforcement officers Lawrence Rainey and Cecil Ray Price in 1967, certain even as they were arraigned for the 1964 murders of James Earl Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Henry Schwerner, that the system was so rigged in their favor that they would literally get away with murder.

When they were killed, Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner were trying to register Black people to vote.