Tumgik
grush3nka · 5 hours
Text
Men can nuke humanity to extinction but women who choose not to have children are the ones men fear the most to kill their bloodlines. Men develop weapons that can kill tens of millions of humans at once but it's women who need to be controlled so we don't bring nations to their knees. Humanity can be destroyed by men committing mass murder on an apocalyptic scale or humanity can be destroyed by women refusing to give birth.
411 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 5 hours
Photo
Tumblr media
257K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 5 hours
Text
I saw a post saying "If porn and prostitution were empowering men would be doing it" and while I absolutely agree I would add:
"If porn and prostitution were empowering men would be fighting to prevent women from doing it at all"
691 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 5 hours
Text
One of the things that makes arguing with men so much more draining than arguing with women is the unequal distribution of credibility and contribution.
Somehow, whenever I argue with men, it always falls upon me to both prove my own claims, and to disprove his, while he does neither; his only obligation seemingly to dole out whatever ungrounded assertions he conjures up on the spot. Somehow, it is always wordlessly established that anything I say is false until proven true, while anything he says is true until proven false.
This same dynamic happened again over on tiktok, when a man claimed women are just as violent as men. Automatically, almost as if by muscle memory, I offered up the usual statistics on male depravity: men constituting 99% of rapists, 99% of mass shooters, 98% of killers, 95% of serious domestic abusers. And his only response was to say those statistics were wrong. No elaboration; wrong simply because he said so.
I already knew how the entire conversation would pan out: I’d give him my source, he’d find a reason to discredit the source, then I’d scour the internet to find a source that suited his standards, which he’d inevitably find a reason to discredit too.
So instead I simply said, “Prove the statistics are wrong.” And that was the only thing I responded with henceforth: prove it, prove I’m wrong, prove you’re right. Thus reversing the dynamics and positing that anything I said was true unless he demonstrated otherwise; unduly putting all the onus on him while I did nothing other than decide whether he was convincing me of claims thoroughly enough—and if he wasn’t, it just meant I was winning, of course.
He blocked me, and so far so have all the other men I’ve used this approach on. I don’t know whether it’s because they couldn’t actually disprove my claims or because they couldn’t stand to be treated the same way they treat women in debates. But I think more women should do this. Stop wasting energy proving your points to men, and start making them prove theirs to you.
377 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 16 hours
Text
204 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 2 days
Text
Look at Pandolf’s scary crocodile face as he approaches this tiny kitten!
Tumblr media
It looks like he’s going to devour her!!
Tumblr media
But he just wants
Tumblr media
to pull on her tail gently to attract her attention.
2K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 2 days
Text
Whenever a male says that "females have no sense of humour" " it's safe to assume that he harassed a woman and she didn't find the situation to be humorous or funny.
688 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media
the girls are peaking
583 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 2 days
Text
351 notes · View notes
grush3nka · 4 days
Text
A woman went viral for being turned down for a next interview for a role, she asks the recruiter what she did wrong, the recruiter tells her they were “concerned about her lack of effort in her appearance.”
She explains she wore a freshly ironed blazer with a collared top. Her nails were painted a professional beige. She got a blowout for her hair, so a professional style. She had on subdued gold earrings.
The only thing she wasn’t wearing was makeup; she states she really doesn’t wear makeup, and only had chapstick on, as her skin is sensitive. Her lawyer mother has already explained she has no legal case against the company for any type of gender-based discrimination.
Just in case anyone wants to ask why feminists still refer to the “pink tax” or rail against more and more elaborate makeup trends being pushed on girls and women.
Women being punished socially for not wearing makeup is still a feminist issue.
31K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 6 days
Text
i wish conventionally unattractive women were able to be successful in the performing arts the same way conventionally unattractive men are. men just get to be talented. women have to be talented and fuckable
3K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 6 days
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Tell me again how it’s “empowering.”
8K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 8 days
Text
Tumblr media
15K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 8 days
Text
Tumblr media
23K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 11 days
Text
“omg you’re just blogging for attention”
and you’re blogging??? for gold? Women? Immortality?
702K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 11 days
Text
Tumblr media
i was about to caption this “me every time my friends and i are just trying to have a nice dinner” or something like that until i remembered that that is, in fact, the exact situation going on in the full strip
57K notes · View notes
grush3nka · 11 days
Text
Tumblr media
10K notes · View notes