gourmetofglut - Tumblr blog

gourmetofglut · 2 months

Link

reddit comments

Douman: Mmmnn… “Love”. “Trust”. “Respect”.

Douman: Seimei had those things. You have those things. And yet, for all of my knowledge, I never had those things. Only obsession.

Douman: Obsessed with winning. Obsessed with the Foreign God. Obsessed with Chaldea. Obsessed with hatred.

Douman: But the memories of ‘Limbo’ makes up my records, but so do the wishes of 'Ashiya Douman’. Someone who didn’t know the Foreign God. Or Chaldea. Someone who only knew the proclaimed superiority of Abe-no-Seimei, the hatred of Japan, and had yet not seen what he lacked.

Douman: …And perhaps that means I must see things differently now.

Douman: So, in other words, perhaps this Douman has decided to finally take Seimei’s advice for once…

I like Douman. I think he’s interesting. I really liked that segment at the end of Heian-kyo when the living Douman talks a bit with Seimei. It’s short, but I think it shows a lot about how different 'Douman’ and 'Limbo’ are in the end.

Marking spoilers because people are still working their way through Heian-kyo. Also, good luck on everyone’s Ibuki rolls tomorrow! She’s cute, but I’ll have to skip her for a certain “Shana-oh” dropping a few months later.

It’s kind of cruelly ironic, actually. That’s the exact thing limbo expects people to do with him and they’ve taken the challenge up with gusto.

If they’d actually read heian kyo they would at least be able to understand WHY he’s like that though

Ashiya douman is an incredibly competent and capable character who nevertheless was constantly compared to an other, more skilled and more well liked person that it was impossible for him to ever ‘beat.’ He was never allowed to achieve anything on his own merits bc people wouldn’t stop comparing him to seimei so when a manifestation of his own jealousy, anger, and people’s perceptions of him as seimei’s villainous foil showed up and taunted him over not being good enough he literally broke. He wanted to be recognized for his own achievements and if he can’t get that as a ‘good guy’ (Ie as an onmyoji) then by god he’d get it by being the villain people want him to be. Limbo as a character exists as what people think douman is-a rival for the hero to beat, a rival to be ridiculed to make the hero look better. He’s slimy and cowardly and odious because that is what makes the hero look better, because his stories were always written only to enhance how amazing seimei were. This is the role given to him by the foreign god, ‘limbo is irredeemably evil’ which is also why his two largest alter ego components are Chernobyl and izapapalotl, who are both ill defined dieties that exist as targets for humanities hatred and grudges over their misfortunes (chernobog as a god of bad luck, izapapalotl as the goddess who ruled over the world where victims of infant mortality were sent) and yet these gods by nature are not inherently evil,, they are like that because of the role they are meant to fill. This is the role he is intended to fill so he tries to convince the reader that it’s true, but he’s trying to convince himself as much as anyone else. He is a being that is essentially a manifestation of ‘limbo’- when he tries to do good he fails to be the hero, when he tries to do evil he fails to be the final boss. He has committed an extraordinary amount of emotion pain upon people because he is incredibly familiar with how insecurities ruin people and, again, that is the role given to him by the foreign god, and yet he can’t commit to anything more because he has no goal until he’s backed into a corner and realizes there is something greater he wants to acheive.

He wanted to become a beast to overcome this fate, failing to realize that beasts are essentially this trope on a much larger scale, ie a stepping stone for humanity to overcome. He failed to become a beast because he lacked love in his heart and he also failed to become a curse on humanity because he lacked true hate. he does not love humanity but neither does he hate it or want to destroy it-all he wanted was for once to be able to surpass seimei on his own merits. He’s obsessed with people who have lost important things to them (Amakusa and arjuna alter) and gets his claws in them by offering them revenge, to show the people who hurt them what they’re truly capable of (like he wants to be able to do himself) He hurts people. He helps people. Limbo overtook Ashiya because he was what ashiya would be remembered as, nothing more than a spiteful shadow, vilified to glorify another person. And when the dust settles ashiya tries to kill himself because he’s so horrified at the idea of becoming something like limbo.

It’s also worth noting that his parallel though out heian-kyo is kintoki. Neither of them have a concrete dream or ideal, but whereas kintoki doubles down on his humanity limbo doubles down on trying to become a superior being. They both desperately want to know what their own dreams and ideals are. Limbo constantly powers up and renames himself throughout the story because he wants to become something of note, and yet whenever a plan fails he has 0 bitterness or distress over it and simply moved to the next one because the fixating is simply on gaining something.

And at the same time the limbo we summon also possesses qualities of ashiya douman. He isn’t wholly evil and he isn’t wholly good. He’s done a lot of bad things and at the same time, there’s an undercurrent of ‘could things have been different? Could things still be different?’ His entire character is built around questions-‘is that skull in the bond ce his?’ ‘Did he hate seimei?’ ‘Did he love seimei?’ ‘Is he evil?’ ‘Is he irredeemable?’ ‘Was he good?’ ‘Was he bad?’ ‘Did he curse that talisman?’ ‘Can he love?’ ‘Does he truly want to help?’ You can’t just take things at face value. They could at least TRY to dig into it a little I think there’s a lot of interesting stuff with him.

But i guess having a bunch of OTHER characters be smugly superior over him (through their connection to other gods or master) or 1001 comics about gonging and maiming him are more pertinent character explorations? It’s incredibly ironic given how much it plays into the role he was assigned, but I feel like saying that under every post that does it wouldn’t accomplish anything.

All I want is for people to at least make it clear that they’re aware of the thematic symbolism and meaning of the character before they charge ahead with flanderization a lá dick wizard Merlin or milf hunter Lancelot. Heian kyo was supposed to give more context (and it did) and if people actually read it and absorbed it’s meaning they’d know that aspects of the real douman are still present in limbo, and even if limbo is still indisputably not a good person, he still has a multifaceted character that has the potential to grow and change. I would also suggest taking another look at limbo’s chaldea lines and commentary as while he’s definitely a…clown, at the very least he basically offers to do your administrative work like taxes. Which imo is frankly more valuable than what some of the other servants offer I may have a bias bc I don’t understand that stuff at all He is an evil person, which is why his offer is to specifically do evils that the master is unwilling or able to do in order to enable them to advance. You may find that unpleasant, but it is something that can hold value. There are other servants like that in chaldea as well, with the only difference being they are less obviously evil or they’ve harmed less people we know of. He is a being that will follow the master into hell. This may not appeal to everyone, but he would do it.

It’s also worth bringing up some of his interpersonal relationships in chaldea- while murasaki is a hair on edge with him she is like that with a lot of people, and is oddly gentle when he asks if seimei had a message for him. She seems to be somewhat aware that he’s different from the douman she knew and adjusts accordingly, and is still respectful. Sei outright doesn’t give a shit that he’s an evil clown and annoys the hell out of him because she can, and he’s basically powerless against her because she’s so self assured. Nursery Rhyme invites him for tea, cuts him off before he can hype himself up into making a shikigami for Jack to dismember, and he ends up playing their mother in law. He literally plays house with the child servants and they enjoy it (for the record, oberon tries to play with nursery later and she turns him down, so she does have a standard.) In one of sei’s interludes he also works to repair her relationship between her and raikou, and peaces out the minute the master calls him out on actually helping people. So he DOES have decent interactions with people even if he also has bad ones-it isn’t all black or all white.

One of fate’s themes is that no one is as static as they think they are and this does still apply to him. Ignoring that is how you get stuff like summer 7, where he was only one of the characters who caused trouble (and was also an ally for a good chunk of time) and yet was the only one to face consequences while the others got off scot free, which iirc pissed off a lot of Japan players.

The most ironic aspect in all of this is that Limbo is the Alien God’s jester. Her clown.

The jester acts like an idiot and because of that gets to know all the secrets of the king’s court because nobody thinks he could actually do anything with said secrets. And Douman behaves with evil in a way where others constantly think they can perfectly tell what he’ll do because if they just know he’s evil and dangerous it means they must know everything they have to know about him.

It’s intentional that in LB4 and LB5, the two people that stop Douman are Asclepius and Pepe. One a disgraced demigod who moves his own path without concern for good and evil, the other a self-admitted twisted man whose nature sets him apart from conventionally altruistic people.

The fact that people are reacting like that is exactly what he would want. To be underestimated and just seen as a “generic evil”.

35 notes · View notes

gourmetofglut · 3 months

Text

The Mischaracterization of Ferris: A thread analyzing Re: Zero's most misinterpreted and overlooked character.

Note: This is a re-edit of a thread I wrote on Twitter. I recently decided to start using Tumblr a bit more. Since I've also been wanting to back up most of my threads, I figured I might as well move everything here. This is the first re-edit I'll be posting on this site. It was one of my favorites to write, so I hope it's enjoyable!

Side story spoilers for the entire thread. Arc 8 spoilers in the speculation section (will be marked since so many people aren't caught up).

For novel readers of Re: Zero, Ferris stands as one of the most divisive characters in the fandom. Considering his poor utilization in the anime and his role in the story within Arc 3, it's easy to see why.

On one hand, Ferris is one of the most outwardly aggressive characters toward Subaru in Arc 3. He makes no secret of his disdain from the start and consistently throws jabs at him every opportunity he gets. This behavior can certainly leave a negative first impression.

On the other hand, Ferris is quite a fascinating character who serves an important role within the narrative of Arc 3. He doesn't let Subaru off as easy as everyone else, which is exactly what makes seeing him grow respect for Subaru satisfying.

Whichever opinion you hold, that’s mostly irrelevant today. Instead, I will be simply discussing his character and his role in the story, as well as arguing in favor of many of his merits that people overlook.

Ferris's primary role is similar to all the Royals Candidates' knights: serving as a foil for Subaru. I've explained the similarities between Subaru and the other knights before, but to sum it up as quickly as possible all 3 of them represent a version of what Subaru could be.

Reinhard is a version of what Subaru could've been if he were the typical isekai protagonist, Julius is a lot more complicated but he’s essentially what Subaru could've been if he were granted enough power to face his enemies on even ground, and Al is Subaru if he had been just a bit unlucky in where he had been sent; becoming someone who struggles to care and abuses his powers to the fullest.

Ferris is much the same, though it can be argued he parallels Subaru the hardest, except for maybe Al. The resemblance on paper between the two is uncanny. They are both physically weak men who often don't fit traditional gender roles and have the sole desire of helping a woman they love to achieve her dreams of becoming a Royal Candidate, no matter the personal costs to themselves.

To do this, they use an extraordinary power unique to them (in Subaru's case RB, and in Ferris' case his magic that is relative in power to an authority). Their need to rely on others for victory is a source of immense mental turmoil and often leaves them full of self-loathing.

They place immense value in the lives of others, even those who have or will harm them, to the point that they are willing to be harmed to help them. Seeing others casually disregard the lives of others serves as one of the things that anger them the most.

They are both prone to obsessively possessive behavior and have sometimes even directed it towards the one they love. This often leads to them getting in trouble due to their jealousy.

There are more similarities I could point out, but you get the point.

Where am I going with this though? Ferris is clearly a parallel to Subaru, but what does he represent regarding him? Put simply, I believe Ferris is meant to represent what Subaru could've been if his parents were just a bit different.

Parent and Child is one of the most crucial chapters for informing us about just the kind of person Subaru is. Perhaps the most important piece is how it helps us understand just how much of his current personality is a result of his father. Subaru not only looked up to him but actively mimicked him to achieve his goals. The pressure of the surrounding world caused him to default to trying to be his father instead of who he truly was. Subaru's parents weren't perfect. In fact, they were very flawed people. Regardless of this fact though, they are responsible for many of Subaru's positive traits.

The same is true for Ferris and his shitbag of a father. If you were to ask any novel reader what Ferris' defining trait as a character is, they would probably say anger or bitterness.

This isn't surprising, as that's how he typically acts towards everyone except Crusch and Fourier, even when it comes to friends such as Julius.

I would argue, however, that this is merely an act he defaults to when he is stressed or angry, similar to Subaru's mimicry of his own father.

During his bitter moments, such as his cold statement to Subaru as he leaves Crusch's mansion in Arc 4, Ferris is merely defaulting to what he has learned to be the best method of dealing with his stress...a method that is eerily similar to how Biehn sometimes acts in EX 1.

Whether Ferris acknowledges it or not, his attitude at his worst moments makes him come off like his father. He can be cruel, sometimes even callous. He shows intense rage when he doesn't get his way and attacks the part of his opponent that is most vulnerable.

This attitude can blind him to the point that he can even hypocritically act racist towards Emilia. Ferris' entire life has been defined by discrimination. In the face of someone he should know has faced many of the same issues, he once again acts almost exactly like his own father.

It was in the middle of a mental breakdown, but that does not excuse him just like it does not excuse Subaru.

Speaking of his parents, it's also notable how their inability to connect with Ferris parallels Naoko and Kenichi's struggles with Subaru.

Ferris' dad is a bombastic, loud man who was (once) well-respected and causes many of Ferris's issues through his actions and Ferris' emulation of him. His fatal flaw in the end was that he could not understand Ferris, similar to how Kenichi could not fully understand Subaru.

Ferris' mom, on the other hand, fully understood the distress he was under but did not have the confidence to interfere or make a change as Ferris wasted away, similar to Naoko's inability to help Subaru when he most needed it.

That's not to say Kenichi or Naoko are even a thousandth as bad as either of those two, but their struggles with their child deeply parallel each other.

Back on track though, I want to highlight a bit more of Ferris' parallels with his father using perhaps the most damning example.

This specific scene is from "The Saga of the Great Crusch-sama Begins." When faced with his mother, whom he hates so much, he attempts to stab her in the chest. Crusch gets caught in the crossfire causing Felix to freak out and unlock his water magic to save her.

What can at first be written off as just a unique origin for Ferris' water magic gets recontextualized hard in EX 1, where it's revealed his father killed his mother in the exact same method.

It's such an eerie similarity and something that I feel gets overlooked too often when discussing Ferris.

As shown in scenes like the one above, Ferris often projects this image of hatred, bitterness, and malice. It's easy to write that off as just the kind of person he is as so many often do...

...but there's obviously more to it than this. There is far more to Ferris than his mimicry of his father.

Ferris doesn't allow himself to be vulnerable very often in the story. Only when he is with Fourier and Crusch, as well as when he is in the most intense moments of crisis, does he show who he actually is. Stress is the best test of character after all.

The best example to me? His confrontation with the father he so often emulates.

If Ferris was actually as vindictive as he so often outwardly acts, how would you expect him to react to the death of a man he hated so much?

Wouldn't he taunt him? Wouldn't he make his last moments a living hell? Wouldn't he crow in pleasure at his agony? Would you be able to even blame Ferris if he made Biehn's last moments hell?

You would expect that...but that's not how he reacts. At that moment, watching as the man who tortured him so much dies an awful death, he just shows sadness. He thinks about the possibility that they could've just worked things out. He just wishes that things could be different.

Despite everything his father had done to him, despite all the rage at the world Ferris projects, the moment he is put into a scenario he likely dreamed of he can't help but feel pity that this was the only route he could take. He never wanted to hurt even Biehn of all people.

And this, I believe, is Ferris's actual defining trait underneath his persona of cynicism and bitterness: kindness and a greater love for life than perhaps anyone else in the series.

Ferris's power, as Fourier once said, is the kindest in the world. At his core, Ferris is just as kind as his power.

Think about it. Despite Ferris's words, what is the thing that upsets him most?

People who waste their lives. Whether it be Subaru, Fourier, a random Vollachian guard, or even Witch Cultists...Ferris can't bring himself to watch life be thrown away. It just hurts him, regardless of how horrible the person is.

Just like Subaru, Ferris wants to help everyone, even if it costs him so much. The pain that he feels when he is unable to do so is immeasurable, as Subaru himself states in Volume 8. He is struggling with the same realization as Subaru: saving some people is impossible.

So where will this lead? What does this have to do with the themes of the story? Well, to answer that, I’ll have to take a little diversion to talk about one of the more…difficult topics involving Ferris.

Ferris and his relationship with gender is something that I feel a lot of the fanbase is really fucking weird about. Even ignoring the pretty deep-rooted transphobia in a lot of discussions involving him (he isn't trans, but he is heavily trans-coded and there really shouldn't be so much of an issue in letting people read into that), there's a feverish desire to deny that his status as a person not conforming to gender norms matters at all. All too often, people reduce it to just a fetish or something to make jokes about.

The reason this is such a bafflingly stupid take though is because of how blatant the importance is to anyone who has read EX 1. Even Tappei himself has stated that many of the things he wants to do with Ferris could not be done without this aspect of his character.

Ferris's non-conformance is part of a promise made with Crusch. Ferris took on her femininity while Crusch took on his masculinity. It's a promise between the two that proves their devotion to one another. It's the ultimate symbol of their affection for one another.

In Aganau IF Ferris dresses and acts more masculine, precisely because his connection to Crusch no longer exists.

I'd also argue it's why he continues to dress as he does even when Crusch no longer has her memories, desperately holding onto the literal symbol of the bond between them.

However, unlike Crusch who seems to love who she is both when taking on more masculine and feminine traits, finding a balance between them; Ferris can't do the same. He sees it merely as a means to show his devotion rather than something he does for himself.

He constantly expresses that it is all for Crusch and Crusch alone. If anything he seems to resent his inability to fulfill any kind of masculine role, as shown once again in his conversation with Biehn in EX 1.

When pushed to finally unleash all his true feelings to Biehn, what does he bring up as the main reason for his resentment? His abuse? His coldness? His murder of his mother? Any of the innumerable unforgivable things Biehn has done to him?

No. Ferris points at his body. He anguishes over his skinny arms, his inability to wield a sword, his lack of muscle, and his lack of fighting prowess. He hates his lack of masculine features and how he's unable to live up to his idea of what Crusch's knight should be.

He literally sees his masculinity as something stolen from him by his father; leaving him so empty that he needed something else to fill that void.

Crusch gave him something to fill that void. Crusch gave him a way to live. Crusch filled his soul...but he still resents what he "has" to be.

Now does that mean he resents Crusch? No, of course not. But he does resent that this is the only thing he can do for her; the only person he can be. Deep down, he doesn't seem to want to be the way he is, and instead of trying to change that he gives in to despair.

He's stuck in that hatred, in that desire to meet Crusch's expectations, and in that moment where a starving child begged to be released and was finally brought into the light. In many ways, he acts like a child.

This is quite literally represented in him preventing himself from going through puberty; a symbol in many stories of transitioning from childhood to adulthood. He sees his current form as a shackle whether he realizes it or not.

Now does that mean that Ferris should disregard his femininity entirely? Throwing away the representation of his love for Crusch and something that has defined him for so long seems as self-destructive as staying stuck. What's the solution? Where is his arc going?

Well, before that, I want to cover one last thing before I have to delve into Arc 8 spoilers. There's a bit of a side tangent I want to go on.

With everything I've been able to point out up to here, it's clear that Ferris is a remarkably complex character. There's so much to read into and talk about.

So why is he so hated?

He's so similar to Subaru, possibly the most popular character in the novel fandom. Despite all the claims of him being the worst and me highlighting his character's flaws, he hasn't done anything more morally dubious than the vast majority of characters in this series, even when he was pushed to the edge. This is especially true when compared to some of the most popular characters like Subaru or Roswaal. Hell, characters even more directly belligerent than Ferris like Priscilla don't get half the hate (though Priscilla's perception has...its own issues).

Why does he get disregarded so often? Why is he often treated as shallow fetish fuel? Why is he just reduced to being an asshole in every discussion that involves him?

Well, I have a few I can point out.

The first is, most obviously, misinformation. A large portion of the novel reader base has not read Arcs 1-4 in the LN and has very warped views of some of the characters in that section of the story. Ferris is just the most blatant example.

I can't count the number of times I've heard people just blatantly lie about or exaggerate what Ferris did in Arc 3. From the "mana bomb" that has LITERALLY no basis in the text to the "brainwashing" scene treated as a comedy bit that is exaggerated to hell, people go out of their way to interpret him in the worst light possible.

Many of the people who haven't read those sections then see Ferris's ribbing of Subaru in Arc 5 and then run with those pieces of misinformation; spreading it to the point that many believe some blatant lies to be fact.

The second is simply that a lot of people in the fandom don't read the side stories. I don't particularly blame a lot of these people, as there is a lot to get through, but there are a lot of people who take advantage of this for...certain reasons.

This leads to the third point...shipping. Ferris suffers from "Die for our ship" syndrome (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DieForOurShip…). A lot of people like Crusch x Subaru and Crusch loves Ferris so that ends up being more than enough for some people to hate him.

That's not representative of even close to every Crusch x Subaru shipper, of course, it's just a notable trend that it's hard to pretend doesn't exist with some of them.

All of these factors often go hand-in-hand with the final factor: the fandom's immense double standards when it comes to certain characters.

I'm not going to go into deep detail with this as it would distract from the main point of the thread...but you know what I mean if you've interacted with the community for a significant period of time. It also doesn't help that many of the same people in this category tend to be incredibly bigoted.

Ferris isn't the only character subjected to these double standards, as characters like Emilia and Ram often face similar purposeful misinterpretations, but his frequently unfair critiques have affected his reputation negatively perhaps more than any other.

This isn't to say that this is all true for everyone who hates Ferris. There are numerous reasons you may just not be interested in his character.

However, I feel it's dishonest to pretend Ferris isn't often targeted far more than other characters for often lacking reasons.

With that out of the way, I can move on to the last thing I wanted to cover in this thread. I have established a lot here, so I want to speculate about the future.

From this point forward there are unmarked Arc 8 spoilers, so...you can't argue I wasn't careful. I don't blame you at all for leaving now and I thank you for reading my ramblings.

Are you still here? Ok, let's start.

With all of the above established, I want to return to the question of where Ferris' arc will go in the future. My belief? I think it will be something similar to what Pre-Amnesia Crusch has already realized, with Felix’s closest parallel in Subaru being close to doing the same.

Crusch, as I mentioned before, has found balance in the two aspects of her life. Throughout the story, she switches seamlessly between the two without a second thought. She is comfortable and happy with both parts of herself.

Subaru is also on a similar path. He feels most comfortable in embracing his feminine side, idealizing it through Natsumi. All his confidence is channeled into that persona, while the other two aspects of his personality (his main self who has all the self-worth of an abandoned puppy and his child self who is representative of his more masculine traits) are imbalanced.

Arc 8 seems to be going in a direction where he realizes how important all of these aspects of him are. All 3 have flaws. None of them are "complete," just pieces of the coherent whole that is Natsuki Subaru.

I believe a similar thing will happen with Ferris.

He will need to find a balance between Ferris, his feminine side that has defined him for so long, and Felix the masculine identity he craves. He needs to find a role that makes him as happy as Crusch was, accepting who he is while striving to become who he wants to be.

I don't expect that to be easy though. In fact, I think the path to get there will be immensely messy and self-destructive.

The idea of Ferris having a breakdown or lashing out has been well-foreshadowed throughout the story. He has had numerous smaller outbursts and has displayed similar problems to Arc 3 Subaru when pushed to an extreme. There's a large amount of toxicity in him that will rush out, sooner or later. It will likely take similar levels of suffering to force him to get a grip, possibly hurting Crusch in the process.

Who do I believe to be the trigger for this? My best guess is Capella.

It is quite possible Capella freed Sphinx and recreated her arms initially. Why would she do this? Why not? We're seeing firsthand how much of a monster Sphinx can be with the Sacrament of the Immortal King. Why wouldn't someone like Capella want something like that under her control?

Of course, Sphinx is almost certainly dying soon. Capella will need a replacement, and who's the only other potential user of the Sacrament? Ferris.

There's also the idea that Capella may have poisoned the Royal Family and, most importantly, Fourier. If Capella does become the main antagonist for Ferris, that could serve as motivation for him to want her dead regardless of his own reservations about killing.

Adding onto this is the fact that shapeshifting is a power with a long history of being associated with identity issues. Tappei likes making his antagonists strong narrative foils to his protagonists, so it would be interesting to contrast Ferris' identity issues with the potentially strong identity issues of Capella.

Finally, there's a lot of potential for her tragic past to parallel Ferris' past, with many implications that the Royal Family may not exactly have treated Emerada the best. The idea that the Royal Family may have locked her away is not implausible and it could make their connections even stronger.

Whatever that breakdown leads to, I expect Crusch and/or Subaru to be the one who snaps him out of it. This will likely be the catalyst that forces Ferris to find a balance. He'll need to let go of things like his self-blame over being unable to help Fourier, his internalized hatred of his current identity, his idealization of Crusch, and his need to save everyone. Ferris's love will finally allow him to grow and change into a person who is the middle ground between his desires and his true self.

After all, that's what Re: Zero is truly about: love and growth. Almost every character reflects this and, if my interpretation of Ferris is right, he could embody that theme just as much as Subaru himself does.

He could be a shining bastion of what this story is all about.

Of course, this is all just my interpretation and speculation. If you disagree with it, feel free to. I just hope I was able to make you appreciate Ferris a bit more/changed your mind on how much potential his character has.

I wish whoever is reading this a nice day!

#re zero kara hajimeru isekai seikatsu #re zero #arc 8 spoilers #ferris #re:zero #rezero

105 notes · View notes