Tumgik
Text
hell hath no fury like someone on the internet being asked to self-reflect on whether or not their behavior contributes to larger and harmful cultural trends
60K notes · View notes
Text
minors are allowed to speak out against child rape fantasy, actually. and you shouldn’t fucking silence them or have the nerve to calm THEM puritans, actually.
623 notes · View notes
Text
I think terms like “antis” and “crosstagging” are a purposeful manipulation of language to minimize ideological critiques. “Anti’s” is a simple term used to group and rally those who oppose things like proshipping and such, and it’s become very powerful for shutting down questioning. If someone explains why they are against the concept of radqueer identities, they are labeled an “anti” and quickly blocked. They are never heard out. “Stop crosstagging” translates to “I don’t want to hear your ideas, I am not open to conversation about my beliefs and I prefer to isolate myself from discourse”… this isolation is exactly why people accuse radqueers of being a cult.
60 notes · View notes
Text
Besides the obvious negative connotation of it thanks to my Stances, I've always disliked 'anti' as a term. Unimaginative and far too general. Depending on who's saying it, an anti is:
-Someone who doesn't condone some variation of an 'immoral' piece of fiction or fanwork
-A hater of a specific content creator/media
-Someone who does not believe pedophiles and the like should have communities online
-Anyone who disagrees with whichever fringe, 'in group'-ish opinion is being spoken about
It just bugs the hell out of me. Youtubers are out here making up increasingly absurd names for their subscribers and you can't do something else? You can’t even be bothered to make 'anti' into a prefix or suffix so it at least distinctly matches the context in which you're using it??
7 notes · View notes
Text
genuinely, honestly, I wish fandom could move past "depiction isn't endorsement".
because it's really meant to be sort of the baby beginner step to media literacy but in fandom spaces it usually acts like a trump card to shut down critical discussions. it's one of the thought terminating cliches of fandom that discourages learning how to interrogate the text beyond "fiction isn't reality, dummy".
yes, the popular whump fic in your fandom isn't endorsing torture, but also, can you tell when the canon for your fandom is endorsing a message? how do you then choose to interact with that canon, and do you get defensive when people are critical of the source material?
depiction isn't endorsement, but can you tell when fandom trends are misogynistic or racist? can you see how killing off a black female character to "punish" her in fanfiction with the framing that she deserves it, and the popular narrative in a certain fandom that a heroic black man is a possessive liar and a white villain is a good man deserving redemption, is endorsing a message in fanfic? do you argue that it's "just fiction" when people get very understandably upset at misogyny and racism in fandom spaces?
yeah, depiction isn't endorsement, but do you think this is where it starts and stops as the only thing you really need to know? do you think people who are critical of things aren't engaging with it properly, or being mean, because they've forgotten the golden fandom rule of "fiction isn't reality"?
nbc hannibal isn't endorsing cannibalism as a dietary choice, but top gun maverick and call of duty: modern warfare were quite literally sponsored by the us military as propaganda for recruitment.
I'm not saying don't enjoy the ip that's making you happy or calling for moral purity in your media habits or whatever. just saying that there's a lot to media literacy beyond the feel good affirmations that periodically circulate fandom, and those affirmation posts both lack necessary nuance and discourage people from engaging with said nuance.
22K notes · View notes
Text
A lot of people have kids because they want a slave...
....Think for a second
The obsession with punishment and discipline and "teaching them a lesson" often in brutal, unforgiving ways that don't teach them to follow their internal guide, but to fear your wrath if they do something you might perceive as wrong
The lack of respect for their bodily autonomy, their feelings, and their personhood
Treating everything they do or say like it's beneath consideration or without any value or significance if it does not serve you in some immediate gratifying way
The overemphasis on obedience being a central factor to how much moral worth they have as a human being
Using the provision of basic necessities(food housing, clothing) to justify mistreating them, treating the provision as something that can be withheld if they misbehave or "step out of line"
Believing their child is somehow always up to no good for no certifiable reason, to justify invading their privacy, denying them access to their social circles and means of communication
Publicly shaming or humiliating their child on camera and posting it on the internet in order to get them to behave in the ways you want them to
Soliciting their child's opinion, then yelling at them for disagreeing with you or "talking back". Also ranting at length about things they know their kids disagree with them about until their kid finally reaches a breaking point and says something, at which point, they're horrible combative children for constantly arguing with you
Treating their emotions as frivolous and pointless, or a sign of weakness not to be expressed freely and openly, forcing them to walk on eggshells around you for fear that anything could potentially set you off
Frequently telling them how lucky they are to not be physically abused. This goes triple if they’re telling them about how they would’ve thrown you through a wall for whatever it was you did that pissed them off, while also not telling you what made them angry, leaving you not knowing what it was that upset them and them deliberately not telling you when you inquire about it
Using the excuse "I am your parent, so I know what's best for you" in order to force children to do something that is only meant to make the parent feel in control, and not for their child's well-being.
alluding that you are the sole reason why they can’t do whatever the hell they want and wished you didn’t even exist so they can have more freedom. (This one hits close to home for me)
These types of parents get off on this, literally...in an almost pornographic way it would seem, by pushing around, harming, and denigrating someone who's smaller and weaker than them, by exerting power and control over a little human being who is unable or unwilling to fight back against them, all so they can flex their big boy muscles, all so they can prove they have dominion over you and show you that you have no power to do anything about it, and then deluding themselves about how it's all about "discipline" or "teaching" so they don't feel bad about it
Does it make you feel so fucking powerful??
Does it make you feel so in control??
Does it make you feel so badass??
abusing and traumatizing a vulnerable little person half your fucking size and feasibly being able to get away with it under the guise of "discipline" with no reproach or recourse because you can't or refuse to deal with your own emotional damage??
Literal demons, like actually, in the purest sense of the word
366 notes · View notes
Text
"kill them with kindness" wrong. SAW TRAP 🪚⛓️🩸⚙️⛓️꩜🔪🩸🪚⛓️🩸꩜⚙️🔪🩸🩸🪚꩜🪚⛓️⚙️⛓️🩸🔪꩜🩸⛓️⚙️🩸⚙️🪚⛓️🩸꩜🔪꩜🪚🪚⚙️🩸🩸🪚⛓️🩸⚙️⛓️꩜🔪🩸🪚⛓️🩸꩜⚙️🔪🩸🩸🪚꩜🪚⛓️⚙️⛓️🩸🔪꩜🩸⛓️⚙️🩸⚙️🪚⛓️🩸꩜🔪꩜🪚🪚⚙️🩸🩸🪚⛓️🩸⚙️⛓️꩜🔪🩸🪚⛓️🩸꩜⚙️🔪🩸🩸🪚꩜🪚⛓️⚙️⛓️🩸🔪꩜🩸⛓️⚙️🩸⚙️🪚⛓️🩸꩜🔪꩜🪚
15K notes · View notes
Text
"You just hate it cus it DISGUSTS you" no I think csa/incest porn in all forms does material mental/sexual damage to the people who make it, consume it, and spread it. Also to the safety of survivors and children.
It's also a tool for grooming unlike any other (happened to me, permanently affected my psyche), particularly pedophillic fan content of things meant for children/teens.
Scat disgusts me. CNC triggers me. I'll keep scrolling.
31 notes · View notes
Text
🫡
Tumblr media
Big thanks to @extremeshinjienthusiast and God for giving me the strength to win my first tumblr cagematch. It was a hard-fought battle, but I look forward to continuing my killstreak as I acclimatize further to this hell-app.
12 notes · View notes
Text
like, I genuinely don't care lmfao like, yeah, explore dark subjects and themes within your writing by all means bc there's loads of good books out there that do exactly that (American Psycho, Lolita, Fight Club, the Dexter Morgan series, etc), but there's a huge difference between, like, genuinely dark content that involves heavy subjects and themes but doesn't romanticise or glorify them, and content which does.
like, the very second that you decide that shit like rape, molestation, incest, pedo bullshit and all that other fuckin bollocks is acceptable to write as wank material - you immediately lost all integrity and ability to call it art lmao it's not art, it's a piss poor excuse to get off to heinous bullshit that's genuinely harmful. fantasy doesn't exist in a fuckin vacuum and you cunts have GOT to accept that, the same as you have GOT to accept that, yeah, what happens in fiction DOES have an impact on real life - or are you daft cunts gonna sit there and say that propaganda isn't real? or that the Jaws Effect isn't real? are you genuinely gonna look me in the eyes and tell me that the media had NO PART in the dehumanisation and demonisation of Arab men? or that the media had NO PART in the fear mongering and demonisation of queer people?
like, fuckin please. I ain't no fuckin prude, but like, some of you cunts think that art means a viable and justified way to produce what's literally kiddie porn and rape porn, and you fuckin ran w it even tho, if anyone irl SAW THAT SHIT, they'd be disgusted. bc it's NOT "dark fic", it's NOT "dark art", or whatever the fuck you wanna call it - it's a fuckin gross, and it's extremely harmful. there's NOTHING romantic or cute or hot about rape, molestation, incest, OR fuckin pedo bollocks. literally nothing.
159 notes · View notes
Text
oh my god wait for fucking mxsickfuck to come out of the woodwork to accuse you of facism and send their followers to harass you to death for saying the words “normal weird freak” if you get a couple SA threat asks you know which group of people sent it
Oh ew, uh a proshitter interacted with me. Friendly reminder that fiction affects reality! You can explore dark themes in fiction without glorifying them! And while I can have lovely chats with people who disagree with myself regardless of being lgbt inclus or exlus. Proshitters are freaks who I don’t want interacting with me. Get help! Cause if you told me you love the idea of adults getting with children in fiction, I’m gonna think that’s fucking weird and so will most normal people.
28 notes · View notes
Text
i think that post expresses well what ive been trying to voice about how i advocate for sex positivity and kink but get annoyed at ''proshippers'' getting in the discussion is that it feels like when you say "sex and fetish/kink arent inherently immoral and you shouldnt hate something just because its sexual" some people seem to take it on the radical opposite statement of "sex and fetish/kink are NEVER immoral and its wrong to discuss the subject because thats equal to puritanism/censorship" and thats just not the same thing. i think sexual material is worth of being taken seriously and analysed and discussed and that does include discussing when its harmful or spreads harmful ideas or behaviors. i dont think sex between consenting adults should really ever be outlawed but that doesnt mean you are exempt from judgement. fetishes like inflation and feet and pooltoys or w/e are things i fully advocate to be socially acceptable because theyre genuinely not harmful in any way to anybody and are only ostracized for being "weird/gross". pedophilia or incest or raceplay fetishes arent ostracized just for being Weird but for including very harmful ideas that cause harm in the real world. sure, im not sending you to jail or whatever, but i still think you suck and i dont wanna be near you. and thats pretty understandable honestly
7K notes · View notes
Text
While i cannot stop consenting adults from engaging in things like raceplay or fauxcest, i can still judge you pretty hard after knowing you do. And i can judge you especially hard if you put these things in the same category of "freak sex" as common LGBT fetishes like leather. You sound a little like conservatives saying that legalizing gay marriage will lead to marriage with animals or some shit. That's what it makes me think of. There's not a single topic of discussion in this world that is 100% black or white. No sex between consenting adults should be Outlawed. But if you can only cum while roleplaying as a slave owner, or as someone sexually abusing their family member, prepare to accept that some people are gonna find that shit repellant, and it's is not equivalent to sodomy being outlawed until 2003 in some states, and still being outlawed in many countries.
4K notes · View notes
Text
honestly if you're offended people don't like your pedophilia-incest-crossover posts about video game characters or whatever get the fuck over yourself. oh my god you're telling me there's people who dislike romanticization of child abuse??? and you have posted these things publicly on the internet where people can share their opinions on them, which leads to you getting hate?? who could have predicted this
396 notes · View notes
Text
"this protest that is 100% peaceful but is disruptive and slightly inconveniencing isn't how you win hearts and minds" babe if your heart and mind are not yet won after three months of constant unfathomable atrocity livestreamed directly into your eyeballs 24/7 there is no hope left for that heart and mind of yours. that's between you and your god at the end of your life that is a curse on YOUR soul. how can you call yourself any kind of progressive and think that the point of a protest is to appeal to people's humanity to win their hearts and minds by being as palatable as possible my god you are all fucking sick in the head
2K notes · View notes
Text
i actually don't think it's unreasonable to have lines between "kinks that are weird and gross to YOU but are perfectly harmless and you should mind your own business" and "kinks that are weird and gross but in a way that's actually tangibly harmful and you should probably have a problem with" like yes there will always be weird puritanical people who think that a fart fetish is the exact same level of "degeneracy" (which is a weird you should never use btw) as actual pedophilia, but like i don't think the solution to people being prudish about sex should be the opposite extreme of having 0 standards. it's kinda lazy in my opinion.
12K notes · View notes
Text
i actually don't think it's unreasonable to have lines between "kinks that are weird and gross to YOU but are perfectly harmless and you should mind your own business" and "kinks that are weird and gross but in a way that's actually tangibly harmful and you should probably have a problem with" like yes there will always be weird puritanical people who think that a fart fetish is the exact same level of "degeneracy" (which is a weird you should never use btw) as actual pedophilia, but like i don't think the solution to people being prudish about sex should be the opposite extreme of having 0 standards. it's kinda lazy in my opinion.
12K notes · View notes