clean-cut-perfection

[clean-cut-perfection]

[clean-cut-perfection]

[clean-cut-perfection]

Not my favourite circumcision tool, although my youngest brother got plastibelled.  I remember a diaper change and seeing the plastic ring on his cock, I was about 8 (and already a full on circumsexual).  So I asked mom what it was she said it’s for his circumcision. Then I asked mom if I had one like that, and she said no yours was different. Wow! I said.  My first conversation about circumcision with mom.

[clean-cut-perfection]

It’s amazing to know that for so many of us cold steel tools were used to cut off our foreskins at birth. Erotic to know …

[clean-cut-perfection]

Probably the best use of the foreskin.

[clean-cut-perfection]

Interesting that this diagram for an unrelated topic of testicle descent shows as normal a circumcised penis.

[clean-cut-perfection]

Use it people…

[clean-cut-perfection]

Islam meets the British Prepuce...

(I found this beautiful history on the following blog:)

http://darkandbizaarestories.blogspot.com/2006/08/force-circumcision-in-islam.html

YOUR BRITISH HERITAGE AND THE SWORD OF ISLAM   Two hundred and twenty-six years ago young Warren Hastings was  circumcised….forcibly! Twenty-four year old Warren, along with  three hundred of his fellow English workers at the Old London  Company offices in Cossimbazar, India, was stripped, sodomized,  masturbated and publicly circumcised by the Moghul troops who  overran the British outpost.  Warren watched in fascination and  horror as his prepuce was carried away in a bag containing all  three hundred freshly severed foreskins….trophies for the  Moslem Moghuls.  Lanky, effeminately handsome Hastings, destined   to become one of Britain’s great colonial statesmen, wrote of his   ordeal, “I, myself, was carved….”    Hastings’ carving was not the first time an Englishman had been  circumcised at the hands of Islamic warriors, and it was not to  be the last time.  The Arabs, Turks and Afghans as well as the  Moghuls have had their turns at plucking off British prepuces.  In southern India, Ma'ajoon, an intoxicating combination of herbs  was employed during the forced circumcision of captives,  producing stupification and causing the penis to rise; the   aphrodisiac made the ceremony easier and, by being performed on  an erect shaft, preserved much of the foreskin.  Tippoo Sultaun,  the tiger of Mysore, used this method on British troops to make  certain they survived and, by incomplete circumcision, to brand  them only partially cleansed; quasi-Mohammedans.  As a prison in  the Mysorean dungeons of Swendroog, Cl. Sir David Baird, a  prominent Scottish officer, was thus mutilated along with other  young subalterns.  Baird and his fellow captives were seized by  powerful Abyssisian slaves, stripped naked and staked to the  ground, their limbs splayed wide.  A white bearded old surgeon  carefully pried his long, craggy fingers into each British penis,  determining the extent of the doomed foreskin.  Then the victims’  mouths were forced open, introducing Ma'ajoon.  The wily old  circumciser waited patiently.  Soon, the drug had taken effect,   and each officer experienced masochistic stimulation; teeth  gritting, fist clenching, eyes transfixed as they watched their  penises rise in anticipation.  When each soldier’s manhood stood  at full flower, the old man announced, “Praise the lord!  Thou  art now to receive the ordinance of El-Knutneh, creating thee all  to True Believer.”  The razor flashed once over each penis.  The  rings of flesh were offered to the fire as liberation to Allah.    Although circumcision is not mentioned in the Koran, the prophet  Mohammed himself is quoted as saying “It is an ordinance in men  and honorable in women.”  Many Islamic theologians have insisted  that Mohammed was born circumcised.   Most Moslem youths, however,  must wait to become “True Believer” until sometime between their  adolescence and marriage, depending upon the sacred traditions of  the various tribes.  In some desert areas, tribesmen include  circumcision in the wedding ceremony, using the bridegroom’s  newly-flayed penis in a test of his “manly strength” when he  consummates the marriage.  Arab boys look forward to their   impending circumcision, the right of passage, with eager  eroticism, as they mutually masturbate their still-uncircumcised  penises and retract their foreskins to show each other how they  will look once they become “men”.    As with all Semitic races, the Arab tradition of circumcision predates their modern religion.  Historians usually theorize that  the practice of ritual circumcision among Semitics is derived  from ancient Egypt.  Little is known about the daily life of the  Egyptians, but proof of circumcision abounds in temple reliefs.  Early Egyptologists assumed that all Egyptian males were  circumcised, but more recently both circumcised and uncircumcised  penises have been found on the unwrapped mummies of pharaohs.  Modern Egyptologists have pondered about just whom among the  Egyptians were circumcised and why".  An early Masonic historian,  Godfrey Higgins (“Anacalypsis”, London 1836), writes, “Priests  only of the Egyptians were circumcised.”  Candidates for  priesthood, and for circumcision, were usually chosen from among   puberty-age, virgin boys.  Quoting modern Masonic historian,  Manly P. Hall (“Freemasonry of the Ancient Egyptians”, Los  Angeles 1936), “In ancient Egypt learning was regarded as a high  privilege and education was under the direction of a small number  of individuals who were organized into bonds, pledges and vows of  secrecy….(a candidate) having applied at Heliopolis, was  referred to the Learned of the Institution at Memphis, and these  sent him to Thebes (where) he was circumcised.”    Some historians have contended that the priests of Egypt were  circumcised as a sacrifice, a forsaking of “sinful pleasures”.  However, the concept of sex as sin is not known to have been a part of the Egyptian religion.  What is known is that the   circumcised penis was a symbol of fertility, as can be seen in  temple reliefs throughout Egypt.  According to Egyptologist, E.  A. Budge ( The Gods of the Egyptians’. Dover Publications), there  was a very early God of Circumcision whose job was to maintain  the fertility of the Nile banks.  Another early Egyptian myth  contended that God circumcised himself and the blood from his  penis fell and created the universe.   This myth is thought by  some to be the progenitor of the blood cults, in which animals  were sacrificed. and the blood covenants in the modern Semitic  religions.  Another theory, quite unorthodox, holds that the   Great Pyramid (Cheops) was not a tomb at all (it contained no   artifacts, no mummies, etc.) but was a temple of initiation.  The  young initiates to the priesthood were, supposedly, led single  file through the narrow passages receiving one initiatory degree  after another and, reaching what is now called the “Queen’s  Chamber”, they were circumcised and then proceeded up the Grand  Gallery towards the “King’s Chamber” and their final degree.  The  circumcised priests were the guardians of immortality; symbols of  fertility and life everlasting.   Sacred circumcision was not unique to Egypt in the ancient world.   According to Higgins the rite was performed on initiates to  secret societies in “Tarnul, Chaldee, Madura and Tibet”. An old  text, “Asiatic Studies, Vol. II”, refers to a Sacred Mystery  School in earliest Tibet which started the celebration of its  rites with the following herald, “Procul ! Hi ‘ne procul c'ete,  profani!”  St. Chrystostom (Homelia 33, in Matt.) says, “When we  celebrate the Mysteries, we send away those who are not  initiated, and shut the doors, a deacon exclaiming, ‘Far from  hence, ye profane!  Close the doors!  Thy Mysteries are about to   begin. Things Holy for the saints, hence all dogs”.  Disdain for  the profane (the “dog”, the uncircumcised male) has trickled down  from the Mystery priests to, centuries later, their Arab  adherents. Amazingly, the Moslems have traditionally used the  term “Dog” when referring to the uninitiated; the  uncircumcised.  "Christian Dog!“ is a slander which has echoed  across many a battlefield. Islamic fervor, almost from its  beginning, aimed its sword at the offending appendage. As Islam  spread its message across the then-known world, history’s   greatest proselytism of the circumcised penis took place and  foreskins were shorn from Spain to India to the East Indies.    High Islam (600-1100 AD) was a period of great culture and  tolerance for the Moslem world, and that tolerance often extended  to conquered Christian populations. In many countries, Christians  were not forced into conversion, or circumcision, because only  uncircumcised males could legally be taxed and the Arab  Caliphates needed the money. The Moslem rulers of Christian Syria  and Sicily were among the most tolerant in all history only  Moslem Spain forced her Christian sons to shed their foreskins.  Indeed, Omar II (Umayyed Caliphate, 717- 712 AD) even argued  against religious circumcision …. a late version of St. Paul. Then came the Crusades. The burly, marauding, rapine crusaders  who swept down from the European wilderness were truly barbarian  in the eyes of the Moslems. And, they were “dogs”. Their clumsy  plunder was soon met, reluctantly, with calculated cruelty…and  Islam once again lost its tolerance for the uncircumcised penis.  Many a handsome Knight in shining armor was dispatched back to  his cold northern woods without the benefit of his “hood”. The  situation deteriorated until, by the time, five centuries later,  British colonialism set its gaze upon Moslem ruled India, it was  "As in Biblical times…“, quoting historian Allen Edwardes,  ("Jewel in the Lotus”, Julian Press 1959), “the slashed prepuces  of the Unbelievers, heaped in mounds following a great battle, in  accordance with the rigid martial code of the Moghul Empire, the  warrior rose in rank according to the number of foreskins he  brought in from the field.”  At this moment in history, British   prepuce met Sword of Islam.    As the mighty British Empire expanded and Mother England sent  forth soldiers, adventurers and government clerks, more and more  of her Christian sons returned home with Islamized penises.  Unfortunately, many did not return but instead bled to death as a  result of their foreskin amputation.  Phimosis, the condition of  a tight or unretractable prepuce, seemingly had a high incidence  among the English, making cavalier circumcisions by Moslem  swordsmen risky, and as far back as 1661, the Old London Company  realized that her many phimosed employees were in mortal danger.  Knowing it was impossible to protect British foreskins from  zealot Moghuls, the British governor of Madras proclaimed that  all applicants to the Company be “bodily examined” and if a cadet  could not “strip his yard” the company surgeon was obliged to  "clip ye skin entire”.  Thus, in 1661, the first circumcision of  European Christians by European Christians was commenced, giving  impetus to three hundred years of routine circumcision in the  English speaking world.    The Old London Company records still exist giving explicit  details about who among her illustrious empire builders were  "clipcocks" and who were “pillcocks” (or, peelcocks;  uncircumcised).  These terms gave rise to generations of English  schoolboy humor and playful contention, not to mention curiosity,  between possessors or the two styles of “cocks”.  For many   generations the “clipcocks”, in the minority, suffered great   indignation.  Robert Clive, the hero in the British takeover of  India, was angered when his phimosed penis was circumcised by the  company surgeon; “By God, had I known I was to come out here to  be clipped I’d have forsaken pork and procured me a scullcap!”  When taunted by the pillcock cadets in his own company Clive  "…did menace ye offending cadets with his pen-knife, asking who  should be the first in ye loss of his precious skin.“    By the early nineteenth century, however, the clipcock became  fashion among the British aristocracy, who wore it as a badge of  honor–proof of serving Throne and Empire in foreign service.

[clean-cut-perfection]

I'm having a vasectomy done next month. My wife and I both agree that, while I'm at it, I should get circumcised. I want to be done low and tight, with all of my inner foreskin removed. My wife says she prefers the look of a high and tight circumcision with a perpendicular ring scar mid way down the shaft. It's settled that I'm getting cut and getting cut as tightly as reasonably possible, but I'm not not sure if I should go low or high. Do you have any advice? Thank you.

Hello, and thank you for the question.

First of all, congratulations! You’re making an excellent choice. Your wife is going to be so happy with the outcome, I’m sure.

It does present an interesting situation, though. 

On one hand, I firmly believe low and snug produces better outcomes in terms of both aesthetics and functionality. On the other hand, I believe a wife should have the ultimate say over what happens to her husband’s penis and reproductive organs.

Usually these two beliefs are concordant but it’s a challenge when they’re not.

In the end, I think I have to come out in favor of honoring your wife’s wishes, even though I personally disagree with them. She is a woman and her authority here must be respected. Even if her decision isn’t perfect, deferring to her judgement is important for your relationship and is the first step into your life as a circumcised husband. Challenging her power to make decisions about your body would violate that dynamic and set both of you up for disappointment and resentment. 

Besides, if she decides in a couple of years that she made a mistake and you’re still too sensitive, to focused on self-gratification, or don’t look as good as she’d hoped, she can always send you back to the doctor to have your inner skin removed then.

It’s important to remember that this entire procedure is about her so telling her that what she wants is wrong defeats the purpose. Just do your best to relax, accept her decision, and trust that she knows what’s best for you.

I hope this helps!

[clean-cut-perfection]

✂

[clean-cut-perfection]

Why do you prefer circumcised penis?

They just look better!!  I have been fucked by a guy who wasn’t circumcised and it doesn’t really feel much different than a circumcised guy but the look of a circumcised cock is soooooooo much better!  Thats just my opinion, I know a lot of my gf’s feel the same so I think it’s probably the same for a lot of girls!

[clean-cut-perfection]

[clean-cut-perfection]

Good old West Virginia!

[clean-cut-perfection]

Circumcision & Association

If you were to put a gun to my head and have me list 10 things I automatically associate with circumcision, the list would be compiled as the following:

10) Confidence - Nothing screams out confidence more than to have your head out at all times, constantly ready!

9) Externalising you cock - Some things were meant for things to go up and others to go up…

8) Using condoms with ease - Condoms actually stay in place and don’t move about.

7) Lube - Not having a foreskin but instead a shiny slippery cock!

6) Hygiene - No gross odours/taste, no putting off women, no smeg!

5) Masclunity - Women have curves, lips and folds, opposites attract so why would I want to have a useless fold?

4) Defined cock shape - Being able to have a penis where you can see everything, the two tonedness of the different types of skin and the perfectly designed and shaped head…

3) Squirting - Having your head so hard and out rubbing against a girls g spot till she gushes in pleasure!

2) Clit rubbing - Sexy play with your tip rubbing your partner allowing for intense sensual masturbation!!!

1) Glossy red lip stick and BJs- There is nothing more sexy or pornographic looking than the most perfect sexually ready lips engulfing a cock head, sliding up and down, lips locked on the shaft, never going past the head and the most perfect spiralling tongue around the bellend!!!!!!!!

[clean-cut-perfection]

[clean-cut-perfection]

[clean-cut-perfection]