buildingrainforests

[buildingrainforests]

Roasted tomato sauce

[buildingrainforests]

[buildingrainforests]

5 Ingredient Dog Food (for space travel):  Organic quick oats, powdered milk/water, 1 egg, coconut oil, pink salt.  Bake @ 350F for 20 minutes.

[buildingrainforests]

Honey butter pumpkin seeds

[buildingrainforests]

On my list today:

how to use unsweetened apple sauce, cuz .. yuck

dog and human treats: coconut oil oats baking powder/soda/pink salt almond milk almond butter cheese butter palm sugar local honey pistachios apricots dried apple pumpkin seeds parchment paper dogs get the fats not nuts

[buildingrainforests]

More leftover oatmeal Coconut Chia Amazeballs 1.5c. cooked oats 1/2c. coconut flake 1T. cane sugar 1/4c. coconut flour 2T. chia seeds 2T. butter 1T. jam form onto balls and rollintheflakes

[buildingrainforests]

Leftover Oatmeal Powerballs Leftover oatmeal Shredded coconut Ground flax Coconut oil PB Strawberry jam Honey Sea Salt Form into balls and roll in the flakes. Put in the fridge till firm.

[buildingrainforests]

golden hour instagram

[buildingrainforests]

flower shower instagram

[buildingrainforests]

Conversations with the State Bar of Arizona

This makes me shake to write it and I'm going to write it anyway and pray for everyone's soul. This transcription is of me and a worker from the Stabe Bar of Arizona last summer, after I launched three complaints against the three attorneys involved in my Family Court case currenting going and with no forseeble amicable outcome whatsoever other than putting me in jail for writing this. The first complaint:  That opposing counsel knew that the MOU, drafted by a third party, unlicensed Mediator we both split the cost of ($1500) to mediate did not get signed and filed and was relevant to acts of Domestic Violence and that by coercively controlling and tricking me into signing what they wrote to suit themselves, would be a way to demolish my relationship with my son and ultimately terminate my rights as a mother.  I complained that she distorts the truth about me and damaged my character to the judge and convinces my Ex that I have become dangerous - then takes money from her victim's Dad (my Ex) to pull it off, follow me on social media and use it against me in court so she can say things like "dangerous". She herself is a dangerous human being for using children for bait and profit. The second complaint:  I asked the Judge at the first hearing we had, where she switched physical custody, if my son could have a voice in all this.   She ordered a guardian ad litem and instead hired and paid for $3000, a best interest attorney so my son could have a voice.  The BIA refused to do her assignment, speak to my son or get his opinion.  She then refused to be professional and return phone calls and emails the entire time of being on the case and ultimately told me I should dose my son prescriptoin drugs to stay in Arizona.  She said this over the phone in a telephone conference with my attorney while I was living in New Jersey and where my son and I had healed after living in Arizona. The third complaint that I did not follow through with was against my own attorney for disappearing and then going to a meeting to add a clause to the parenting agreement without my knowledge or consent.  I decided not to file because well, this thing is already a nightmare. B: = Bar  (This woman seems older and seems like she is a ligitagator - she used a lot of words and talked really fast.  She also had a lot to say in a short amount of the time of me filing the complaints.) V: = Me B: .. but anyways I'm going to go ahead and dismiss the charge on Melissa Errico because she the court told her to look at specific things and that is where should the child reside. She gave her recommendation, the court took her recommendation. Once you guys had (inaudible) after the settlement conference .. V: She didn't look at all the evidence though, she didn't read the .. (she is interrupting and overtalking) B: I know you didn't believe that but she felt that she did .. she said she got the entire file of you on everything and she reviewed that entire file V: Why did the court say that we were supposed to work with the best interest attorney, but then there was no working with her? B: But she, and she said that and what happens, she said that the court had worded that oddly because she's only allowed to do so much .. V: Oddly? Hold on a second, olddly. They changed custody. They changed custody, oddly is not, I'm sorry .. (interrupted again) B: But what I'm explaining to you is that what she said is that the way it really works that the best interest attorney the court says this is what I want you to investigate and that's all she's allowed to investigate. So as soon as she was appointed, she asked your attorney and the father's attorney if she could speak with you guys directly about things or if she had to go through the attorney. The father's attorney gave her permission to speak to the father, your attorney told her she was not allowed to talk to you directly. (Me in my head: WTF I never ever said that) V: Ummm... B:  And that everything had to go through him. V: That was never written anywhere. That was never written .. B: It doesn't have to be written but that's what your attorny told her. V: Wait a second, my attorney can't tell her something like that. No attorney can t .. oh ok (she's saying stuff and interrupting me) B: No because he's your attorney and an attorney is not allowed to represent .. V: .. who also disappeared B: or contact .. who's reprented, they're not allowed, by law, to contact someone that has an attorney V: Why did (the BIA) instruct me to give my child medication to stay in Arizona? Is she a doctor? B: She said that she did not instruct medication for Arizona but what they did do when you were concerned about valley fever is have the father test the child and the test was negative. There was no valley fever. She said she .. V: And what about all the symptoms? What about all the symptoms and school that he missed? What about the physical symptoms? Forget the word valley fever. What about the physical symptoms that was happening to him physically? She didn't look at that? (interrupting) B: She said she talked to the father .. V: (and I'm still talking) She didnt' look at that. And she didn't look at .. I'm sorry? B: But the father took him to the doctor to have everything .. V: He missed school, days and days of school .. B: Well they do that sometimes. Yeah, I don't know .. V: They do that sometimes? Excuse me. That is not .. excuse me. B: No. And I'm saying I don't know what's happening there. V: And I removed my child before that could happen and he was forced to go back and then that happened. B: Mm Hm. But I did want to let you know that the father had taken the child to the doctor and the doctor did not find anything. V: And I took the child to the doctor and the doctor could not find anything but he still .. (she's talking over me here) V: had symptoms and he still missed school. B: Well that's something you should talk to the father about. V: And I have talked to father about that and he doesn't listen to me, the same as it's always been. So .. I thought that was supposed to be Melissa Errico's, I thought Melissa Errico was supposed to, I mean what exactly if she wasn't supposed to work with us what was she supposed to do? B: The court assigns specific things that the court wanted to have information about. Very specific things. She was required to research specific and she said what the court asked her to do was to help make a determination of where it was best for the child to live for the majority of the school year, it sounds like and she said that's all that the court asked her to do. V: That wasn't in writing anywhere and that wasn't in writing. I didn't get that B: (inaudible) writing and (would not let me finish my sentence or thoughts) so I kept talking over her V: I asked, I asked for the Judge, for Grace'son to have a voice in this. For where .. is Grace'son (overtalking) V: No, she did not provide a voice for Grace'son because Grace'son is over here writing letters saying that he doesn't want to live in Arizona and that he doesn't want to live there. (I have lost all focus here and she was able to turn this whole piece around - p. genius) B: Then you should take that up with your attorney. So that your attorney can discuss that whoever they need to in the court. That's not a situation I can resolve. That's a legal situation between you and the father. You guys are not agreeing on things it sounds like, that's not a State Bar thing, that's not something I can look at. All I can look at is, is an attorney following licensing rules. I'm not seeing any instance for either Sarah Collier or Melissa Errico, that they're not following licensing rules. They doing exactly what the courts told them to do. V: They both lied to the judge. B: That's what you've said but they the information was .. V: They are allowing this guy to stalk and harrass me so that I can't stop fighting for my son. They switched custody illegally without anybody doing anything about it and they're getting away with it. What about my attorney. B: And so I tried to contact your attorney and I can't get a hold of him. So, since I can't get ahold of him I was going to ask you to please write a written charge with some of the things you told me on the phone about him. Can you put all of that in writing, send it to me and then I'm going to set him up for further investigation becasue I can't find him. Are you willing to write a written charge about him so I can have them do some further investigation him? V: If you aren't willing to look at the original document that didn't get filed so they could lie to the judge I don't know what good that's going to do. There's a missing document that makes this whole thing null and void. The entire case. B: Then you would have to bring that to the court's attention. Because that is a legal issue. The attorney and the best interest attorney and opposing counsel all said that you have an original MOU that you signed and filed with the court. That's what's being followed. That's what has to be followed. (wow! so i didn't hear that part till now) V: No, they said that we were in agreement. They put in there that we were in agreement and there was no agreement because the agreement never got finished. B: And the last two summers they said that you wanted to try and get it ammended and the father didn't agree so it reverts back to that original one. V: Um. B: So if you feel like you should have something else happening you would need to file something with the court with your attorney because it's a legal issue. You're saying that somebody isn't doing something that you think they should've done. That's a legal issue for the court. All I can look at are things like did they steal your money. Did your attorney steal your money. And those are the licensing fees .. V: I thought your job was to find out if they were lying. B: I did find out that they were not lying through the investigation that I performed. I have informatio, I have been provided with information. V: How can you tell B: and that nothing that Melissa Errico said was a lie. Based on on the information they have provided to me. If you think that's wrong then you should have your attorney file something with the court. V: And I don't have money to do something like that and they all know it and they have continued to have precedings that are costly that nobody afford anyway. B: They only do those precedings if the child doesn't get returned on time because they're required to do those precedings V: You mean and .. B: It's not just to try and hurt you they just said that when the child doens't come back on time we have to .. with the court V: Um. The child .. B: The counsel does not .. (inaudible) I'm just letting you know the .. V: They have legally kidnapped my child. They have legally kidnapped my child. They did it with money, they did it when they made sure I didn't have the money to defend myself and my kid. And they did it with money. So they are stealing my money. Every time they file something that forces me to pay attention to them I have to stop what I'm doing and address them so that I don't get thrown in jail for my own child. B: And they said if you return the child on time they won't have to file anything. That's what I was told. V: I shouldn't be returning my child anyway. He's my child. He does not want to live there, he is sick there .. it's an illegal order. It's an illegal order based on lies that they filed. They didn't file all the information which is all a lie, which makes the thing null and void. And also not to mention the domestic violence that already happened leading up to it nulls out the order and the jursidiction and everybody knows that including me and I think you know that too, so .. B: All I know is the investigation that I'm allowed to do regarding licensing issues or whether the attorney is follwoign the licensing rules I have found nothing the would warrant futher investigation on Errico or Collier and I'm dismissing those charges. If you have issues with things that have already been done in court you would have to do something with the court. Because that's a legal issue for the court. Now what I have asked you and you can decide if you want to or not it's because I cannot find your attorney to talk to if I could get a written charge from you I could set that up for investigation. Somebody will try and find him and we'll talk him about your charges on him and then make a determination based on that information but I haven't been able to get ahold of him. So would you like to submit a written charge on him so we can do an investigation on him. V: Possibly but it sounds like you're just going to drag me around even more and further violate my rights as a human being to protect my child, I mean I can't , are you going to help me protect my child? B: I cannot go against the court order. There are already orders time for your husband and time for you. That's a court order. V: It was not time for husband and time for me B: I cannot make any changes to stuff filed with the court. All I can do is if the attorney who was handling your case at this point has done anything inappropriate once we find him. But if you don't like that original order, but the court has entered an order that you signed. Taht is not anything that the state bar can change. The court has orderd that to be entered and that .. V: And I was also forced to sign other things that got filed without the other things being filed and tricked that way also. So, I have been tricked every time I signed something with Arizona I have been tricked and stripped of my rights becaseu I agreed to sign with you. Including .. and it feels like you are ok with them taking my child who I raised 100% of the time. B: I had nothing to do with that. All I do is .. V: I have one other question. How is it that ok for Melissa Errico and Sarah Collier to have a meeting with my lawyer to decide these things and then get them signed? How did that happen? B: Well you signed them. That's the one that got entered. You signed them. V: I did not agree for them to write that, sign that and meet together and form those words and then have me sign it. I did not agree to that. I signed the last papers .. (overtalking) V: under duress without any advocate and without my attorney even

[buildingrainforests]

Crustless Quiche:  8x8 glass baker 350F.  in a bowl, whip with a fork 6 organic eggs, 1/4c. clover sour cream, pink salt, pepper.   butter the baker.   pour eggs mixture into baker  and add dollops of trader joes triple cream wild mushroom brie.   bake 23m #cheatingvegan #momsndadscleaningupmesses

[buildingrainforests]

Gaslighting as a Manipulation Tactic: What It Is, Who Does It, And Why By Dr George Simon, PhD | 8 November 2011 Gaslighting is a sophisticated manipulation tactic which certain types of personalities use to create doubt in the minds of others. Here’s how it works and what to watch out for. In a stage play and suspense thriller from the 1930s entitled “Gas Light,” a conniving husband tries to make the wife he wishes to get rid of think she is losing her mind by making subtle changes in her environment, including slowly and steadily dimming the flame on a gas lamp. In recent years, the term “gaslighting” has come to be applied to attempts by certain kinds of personalities, especially psychopaths — who are among the personalities most adept at sophisticated tactics of manipulation — to create so much doubt in the minds of their targets of exploitation that the victim no longer trusts their own judgment about things and buys into the assertions of the manipulator, thus coming under their power and control. Effective gaslighting can be accomplished in several different ways. Sometimes, a person can assert something with such an apparent intensity of conviction that the other person begins to doubt their own perspective. Other times, vigorous and unwavering denial coupled with a display of righteous indignation can accomplish the same task. Bringing up historical facts that seem largely accurate but contain minute, hard-to-prove distortions and using them to “prove” the correctness of one’s position is another method. Gaslighting is particularly effective when coupled with other tactics such as shaming and guilting. Anything that aids in getting another person to doubt their judgment and back down will work. Gaslighting is just one of the many weapons in the arsenal of personalities hell-bent on having their way, even if it means doing so by subtle and covert means of conning others. One of the most important, is that they will do whatever it takes to secure and maintain a position of advantage over others. And some of the most effective means at their disposal are tactics that conceal their malevolent intent while simultaneously prompting their “target” to accede to their desires. I outline the most common ones covertly aggressive folks use to manipulate others in my book In Sheep’s Clothing [Amazon-US |. But it would be virtually impossible to fully list all of the various tactics expert manipulators use. Deception is often the key ingredient in manipulation. Deception can be accomplished by outright denial, distortion of key aspects of events, and a variety of other methods, especially the more sophisticated lying techniques. A really accomplished liar can deceive another person by merely reciting a litany of absolutely true things — while deliberately and cleverly leaving out one or two crucial elements that would change the entire character of what they’re trying to make you believe. But a common element among all the tactics manipulators use is that they cause the person being targeted to doubt their gut instincts about what’s going on. Their gut tells them they’re under attack or that someone is trying to get the better of them, and they intuitively go on the defensive. But because they often can’t find any clear, direct, objective evidence that the other person is merely trying to disadvantage them, they start doubting and questioning themselves. This is the real secret of effective manipulation. If the “target” were solidly convinced they were in the process of being done in, they’d more likely put up more resistance instead of capitulating. Manipulators know this. They win by getting the other person to back down or give in. Gaslighting has come to some prominence lately because several authors have highlighted it as one of the more crafty tactics psychopaths use to disadvantage their victims. But many character-disturbed individuals, most especially the aggressive personalities, are prone to using numerous tactics, including covert techniques, to get the better of their targets. Their goal is always to win or secure whatever it is they want. And they’ll do whatever they have to do to get it. Sometimes the most effective way to do that is to avoid red-flagging their intentions but rather get the other person to unwittingly but voluntarily surrender. Instill shame, instill guilt, instill fear, or instill great doubt, and the other person will likely back off the stance they really wanted to take.

[buildingrainforests]

[buildingrainforests]

Predatory, illegal document that changes physical primary custody without due process. This did not cover travel expenses to fly to Arizona, meet with them and sign this illegal trickery. This is how Arizona takes your kids and bankrupts you at the same time.

[buildingrainforests]

[buildingrainforests]

Fwd: Your upcoming phone call with Apple Support.

Begin forwarded message: > From: Apple Support > Date: November 25, 2015 at 7:01:36 AM PST > To: [email protected] > Subject: Your upcoming phone call with Apple Support. > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > > Talk to you soon. > As you requested, Apple will call you at the day and time below. You can add this appointment to your calendar by selecting the attached file. > Apple will call you > When: Wednesday, November 25 at around 7:30 a.m. Pacific Edit > Phone: [phone] > Case ID: 995047506 > Open this case > Sincerely, > Apple Support > > Get help online > Visit Apple Support to learn more about your product, download software updates, and much more. > > Join the conversation > Find and share solutions with Apple users around the world. > > TM and copyright © 2015 > All Rights Reserved / Privacy Policy / Support / Give us feedback > >

[buildingrainforests]

Fwd: Update from Gmail on your missing emails

Filled out the request form for missing sent and received emails from March 18 to August 13, 2015 and this is the reply. Begin forwarded message: > From: [email protected] > Date: December 2, 2015 at 6:12:10 PM PST > To: [email protected] > Subject: Update from Gmail on your missing emails > > > Hello, > > We received your request to recover deleted emails from your account. Unfortunately, the emails were permanently deleted, so we're not able to get them back for you. > > We know this can be really frustrating, and we're sorry that we can't help this time around. To help prevent this from happening again, it's a good idea to double check the security of your account. We've put together some tools and tips in our "Security Checklist" article that you can read through in about 10 minutes to make sure the only one who has access to your Gmail is you. > > If you'd like to better understand how deletion works in Gmail, or how long email stays in Trash before it's deleted (about a month), please read through our "Deleted Messages" article. > > Thanks again for using Gmail, > > The Google Support Team > > This email can't receive replies. For more information, visit the Gmail Help Center or the Gmail Help Forum. > © Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA